isda_ng Sitio Naswe, Inc. CSAnIMANA) a si NS: Ton, GRNO 196028 , April 19, 2016, Brion, Jes __ FACTS: _ Petitioner is an association of farmers and gisnecmen_cbiening tat fs a members have reided at Sitio Talagq. eataan, tor several years doing. _________ Farming achyities pron which they derive their income + Respondent, - on the other hand, was the highest bidder or the fubjed land «On _ = hug. 4, 9000, he executed a Deed OF Sale with CSO. However if was _—______faund out _frad_eavlier iin 4944, the MARO issued ca NOH 6 Coverage id Over te_land ond it was targeted for CARP acquisition fer year dow. ________ Ihe Noe was litkd aster the request to Stop the acquisition. Pei- _____on0r_ petition to_reoive +n€ order _mucs clismissed_oy CA upon gindi= a __8ue whether or no NOt {he petiti oner_is a teal party + nases HELD: No, 4h vty sin intrest. et ___Under_the law, por par-ticularland ang its pis) gomvates see a oes a | + Q: tat _land should be covered oy corresporaing Notice of Ove cage i_and b. We benericiarits must be qualigied and registered bi __tre_ DAR. 2 = ____In 4ine_ouce_at par, tne peti tiorer_ ei 4o_allege_and_prove _ that its mem bers are identitied and registsed quali¢ied benericae _ __ aie Subject land, or have already oworded_portions oe = oo ee a iit would vali in 1 tus Of the lon’ es maving ____O real, Adual, matwidl in tuest to queshon Br "9 the __NOKR Of COverage yer the long.Samet tomenianers _hsesclaty iON Of Hermosa, Bataan vs. Li ne _tR NO. e001, Bug: 34, 2006, saa ENCIS: bm 165, responcents sited with Amo. uctuntiay net Sel Cos) their property. Howerer, notwithstanding the reoxi nt of OARS Offer - to purchase, respondent withdraw) their VOS and applicd ror tne con- version Of the pro perty from Agriasltural to industrial, eommescal, ond residen tal uses. the pplication was denied. Respondents tited fo tre Off py the President to ubich it approved the satd applicer tion- Aga rieved, petitioners sought teconsideration which was gien = due course and reversed tne OP resolution: On appecii. cA tuted in favor ___0f the respondents ana reinstakd the OP resolution. Petitioner led an MA on the ground that respondent ae nota real party~in-in terest. sel —ASSUE: whener_or_not ihe CA erred in cuiiag that the parties ae nota Weald pop teers nla este a HELD: Petitioners sailed to substantia’ the Olaim tat they hove been ____identified as qualified beneficiaries 94 the Lifton _propech) uncler ge CARP. Sin ch, the pind ngs—of the OP replution reveal that the —_______Pefifioners_, in reality, ove_not tunants of the Littors tput_mere ____Ocuuipants _6f homelots without _theie consent, who use the Property ________ for residential pur pots and_Commercial activities.a nitions 9 agp em = 8 _Pgrarian Reform, {8 No. 38744, July 14 4499, Cru, I — FACS: The Cue _e fore the Court involves oi lidated cases_which simi- —______lavly allege the _constitutionatit) of P-0.No-a9, to nos. a8 ang 334 0nd RA leS4_on the grounds of separation 4 powers .clue prows, af qual_protecion, and the constitutional limitation that no private pro- —_perty_chall_we taten for public use without Payment of just Com —___Pensation- ME fixing ¢{ just compensation i entrusted to Adminis i otive_outhonties in violation Of judidal_prero Gatti ves-_ ISSUE: whether or nel ie manner o¢ fixing the just compensation, as ________prorided in Set Le RA 654, is constitutional se HELD: es, it is constitutional. aaa HE ao __{ne_petitioners made specitic rescence to Section 10 Ca) of RAGS whith provides that in case of rejection Or disregaral by Ye owner _ Of ne_oyer Of tr Qovenment to pay hi jand. the oAR chal Cond summary _qdmials trative _proceecings to deivming the Compensation for the land by requiring the land oumer , the LBP, —______0nd_otner_intuestd parfi® to cupmil evidence as to the just _____fompensafion per ine land_,within 18 Gays prom the receipt Of tre notice. Ine det mination mage ny ine PAR enly_pretiminary — —____unless_Guepted by all _pay-ies Concerned. Other wise, tne _courts of ___ — justices wills have the right to review with finaly the = said_seferminaHion in the exeruse ey what ts admittedly cl uh coltrane tories eeee eee | e DR No- WeqS14, March 20, a00t, Callejo, Sc. J. ___ Gs tonrtD eh aa enjoin ane _ OAR, o- Reena | — Cane _farms of peti boners to emi nent Or compulsory acquisition ——_without filing the necessary expropriation proceedings fursvant to the Provisions of Rule GF. they contend that their members own ———__Privale_agricultural_ lands devoked fo cugarcane_sincetinre immpmoigl. a Also, a landowner cunnot pe depnhved of his property until €xpro- __ pation proceedings are institukd in court. Usue: Whether of not Section 1 RA Gest be followed in the gin Case HELD: Yes, contrary to the get fionerS sub mission that the com pu) ——s SOM Acquisition pmcdwie adopied by the OAR K wi hout cee | legal bosis, Ht 1 actually bi Seaion 4 RA woST. pet under $n@ said law, Ane are two modes of acquisition_e4 pri- | yale Oger cultura! ands: Com pul son} ond _voluntan)- the procedure aOn —_____Land_Bank of fhe Philippines us. Court ©f Appeals, Pascua! aa] GR No- 138554 , Dee 29, 1999, Belosifio, s.> x FACS: Privale respondent ownta three (2) parcdk o4 band which were placed under DARS operation land transier_C0L1)_ pursuant to Poat ae Gnd £0 aag. aie aH eS —__Pasaya!_oppnssed the recommended average_oress productivity CALA) SEIN PAR ina penition filed with the DAR Adqudtcation Board. PARAD ruled iin favor oy him, hence, he Guepkd tne valuation. How- ____8, when the fragment beccnie_tinal_and eeu tory, peritioner, as ‘the_finaning_avm_in fre operation of Pat ond EDaag_» refused __ ____te pay. Petih oner aims that PARAD Cannel make an valuation _ sina_it is unde tne Pxcmigive jursdtoh on of ine Secretary Of nag. TsSue’ whether or nol PARADS valuation is valid. — HELO: Yes, pARAD'S valuation is valia- seal mie se Although it is in@ DARA which has tne authority to Cetermine tne _inihal valuations lands, involving agrarian reform, Such valuation may only be considered prelimi nany Os the fina] deke- Fmination o¢ just com pensation is vested ia te courts »sittingas Spedal agrarian courts csac). = nee aRepublic ef the Philcppines ys. Castellui y tr No-L-20080, Aug. 1551494, FAS: Fifer th® Owner 04 aparcel_oy land thet has been rented and ocd fied by the _govermenent in 144Fpepused to extend the lease, the — —_______laller_commenced exp priation proce dings in 1954. uring the os 2a esment Of just compensation, the petitioner argued inet Hhadta: Ken the property when the contra of lease commend and rotnngn tne prowedings begin. the privat respondent contends triat the a- puted land was net taken when the _gorenment commenced to ___dUupy suid land oy alesee becuse the essential element of the “ tdking’ under the Power of eminent domam i not present. see i ISoue:_wneher or net the taking of property has taken place when fre petitioner _hos ocwupled $e propa) HELD: NO, the property was deemed taken onl) when the expropriation = preening seommencatin ae se _______the essential_dements_04 taking ore: a. expro priator must entra Privat _peperty yb. the entry must pe sor more dnaya_momentan eustineee z i rit ro lteal-misthonty: —0..1Ne property _muyst_be_Germkd to publtc we or otherwise Ingontaly _______tippropriakd or inuinoustly opecka ; ¢. the utilization the p= petty Por _public_wse oust bein such away as 0 oust the owner __ _______and_seprive_nin oy benegidal enjoy mem oy property. tn the cue char, the elements were nol_presert when the go- vernmert entered Gnd ewupied the property under a contrac OL tease —EEEe——E——EEE =me —_________ Mifonso_vs. Land Bank of te Phili ppings, &R Nos. 4919123 183347, Nov. ao,aoly, Jardelezq, J... FAds: One named Palomar cold her aig nts orr_twe ca) nce Of lands fo the pehtionen. Prior to tnis, the AR Sought to acquire the pro pertes_ct OARS vawaton fo uhrch #@ Palomar rejected A yaluaton as was Hen submited by using. the marke! Aad Gpproach and capi __talized income approadh. LBP, petitioner. contends that such _____Yauation is_in wolation of the provistons of RA @eS#- CA then found that the JRC foiled to observe the procedure, Gnd Le guicelines for vawwat on- et on 4 ISSUE" whether or_not Ie Courk are obliged to apply the PAR forma z a in cases _wnere Mey are asked to determine just compensation i ee OE ee La HELD. No, Courts are not obliged: Sassen 3 RA 409 Gnd tne amendment in f€C-5F oF AA OlST, these Gdn nishatie orders in toduced a change In O reckoning Gut o cwerage_ ___ Gross produc and Selling price, both are which cre relevant 0 +n WL faGor. the fadors Iisted_under RA Get and its resulting formula provide 3 uniform grame work or chuctute for tne com Puta ©1n_of just compensation _whidh_ensures that the Qmount —__To he paid to be oxeded tand ownees re not arbitrary.the ________ (ours, may, in tine exercise _o4 tneir juarcal_aisretion, rela the —______formulaS_appiicatien tpi tne factual situations peyere them, —______fubiett Only fo th@ Condition that ihey dearly exjiain iy Aheir_easion ther _reasonc. eeeRepublic of the Philippi oes a5. Bonk of te. Milippine ans, = CRwo- 203034, Sept. 41, tos, Carpio, J. FACTS: the OPWH piled Gn_Xpropria hon prowedings against the portions of the pro perty 04 the respondent. Neither the respondents objected ty ___ Ane 2X prigfi On, hen the trial lal court through board 0 Comnigim Ones, Geler mimes just compensation. Pefitigner cums that ine burkdng NUS never taken ly the govern ment Trial court nuled that the de- —____molition_of foe_cid building of Bex can be cons fuel os a conse~ feeeietoteic quential_ damage, OCG result of expm ration A held thal no actual toKing_61 tne _re maining portion Of the property i\_neesay togra- i ier tal Greene I : ISSUE: _whether_or_not_ine Oward s Gdditional just oumpen sition for BP's Iauilding_in the Omount ¢ixed theeafier iS ynfounded and i witout _legdl_basis ___HELD:_ine_ states go gover tine Soman hed by tne cust on] __ 7 eee Cee romp= _______tnsotion «the general tule istiaat ine MSt_compensation tomnich Me owner o| ne_congemaed property is entitled to_market value. Markel VANE {5 that some sum _o4 money which O person desirous loxl_0Cl_compened to_buy,cnd on owner willing but not compa ________ fo Sell, would agree on as ci price to be paid by the _buygrand rewived by ine seller. the general rule, however, iy mod igied winere —_____Grly_@ part 0 cartain property is _expropaatd. nine coe at | bur, the owner is not_restriced to compensation fur die portion actu lly taken, b@ is Glso_enhtled to recog the comequen tial damage,Land Bank of tne Phili ping ys: Limo _, ER NO- 170.685 September 83,10, ek Castile TAS: Enrico Livioco was te regicised owner of d sugar land located in _____Parnpanga » 9 which ine offered to PRR for _cequibition. the veluntay ——__byfur_to sell (ves) form was supmited and ay ter, reputed to the pe- _____fiftoner_jor vawation. Livioco was i fone oy the valug Hon but sate the ddim pyoceds nave _loeen kept penaing hecause, he wos_yet to ___submit his puneship dow ments. Livioco did not acted upon Such no~ tic hence, pehtioner isued a certigicahon ti the Register of Deeds 05 _conipensation_for tne Sugarland: Twas only Oey two years thot _______livioco requested or a revatuation of the compensation on the gm __ und _that_ fas already prescribed /appreuia ed from the time it was __Ofered_ gor Sle. ___15Sue._whejner Or not ine compensation for résponaentS property was in auordcnce with the law _ Web ne tover court ena in ruling tnaline onoeaster_ canoe | ine_pre perh)_has changed from agricultural fo_restaential because, _H1Ue_Was no Gedoretion by DAR forth preperhy. eee ee ee eee — _________dencd_and_geeemination of just compensation in Qtordane __with Section 13 oj RA GOSt: O- com of ocavisition;bo-natueand Bank of te Philippines yS. DomingO, 68 No- 163533, ___Febuiany 4, 2008, Carpio, J.” Hees FACES: Repundert ws tne regisiered emer ofa pareel of fond in Nuerd Eaija» which was tiled bY farmers - Pursuant tp PO 2% adval tonont-titlenc ______are dee med gull cwners_of the land they Hil hence tome pars the ___land were taken by the government ard gave it to farmers. using re Quid®ling for just compensation, the PAR fited the value Othe Subject land. Respondent #oen_giled 0 aeterm ination of just compensation jn ____ Occordance with the formula_under Ra uS4. LBP contenokd-tnat respon- dent's land under PD 84nd £0 238 shence, the formula for the just ______compensction_pnaula pe under such faws. RIG held that just compe _________satiua_should_be Computed under the formula stated ernie =| = hich Iinnees letter ow) on ogrmnan rears ES ot RI 5 ould. be. applied in_the age mination _ jus en sation 0.23 HELD: tne _dak oO, taking o; the subjed land _for_pur poses of cumputing _______ jy compensation snoule_oe rected Grom the Beyonce dais of einer ee ________ Ne ap rivishee ey PS teat are veSecreton) Of the DPWH ve tecson CR No. ee | pr 44, 2045, Peralta, 3. TE Seca sieeedltyin tng innann goer ________ ment _projed under taken_sometime in 1940. The tetking happened with = eine a eae Ond their consent. tence, "= at paling te arate sega, Heraceo - sed _____4._ comp aint for recovery of possesion with damages. RT nd cA ___ TSU: whether or-n0% Compentiion shouldbe bene! on Wo market vane ee ime_o Me tableg rective,_On out ddd valuation, the long established rule that ______{h€_falr_equitalent © property should _loe_compu fed_not athe _ ____time_of payment, put dt the time of taking. This Is becuse the att. te = ee ee loss Hnee, TheLond Bank of jne Philippines vs. Soriano, Genes. 49074a ond 190776, Nay @, 2040, Pee 2, $4 — FAGS:_Respondents Gre owners Of severe parcels O4 land in_Avloay. ____most_of it were placed under ppecation Land transyer (ort) Not ________ogreeing_with the _value_pegged oy tne_petitioner, respondents _ ___instituted_0 complaint for_judiGal_detumi nation oy just compen __ Sation_oleging that_they Ore_entitled to an annount not Kes than £45. The_speaal_agmrian Court _nokkd infor of the respon~ ______dent «LBP the peti oner, then sougnt @n appedl to nullify the et aoe Lt A pepe aera eee ____ ISSUES Whether or not 4h@_lower courts “tse coneot int valuation HELD: 44, the valuations made by the government One coneGr ______ingopar as CARL is concerned « the said law Provides that lush ______wmpensation f deermined by tre cost of the acquisition Of the io Jond. tre umert value of the properi®, ty naWie adualuseand in@me- WE swom vawuation oj the owner , tax decidrati ons, J nd assess ment made ty the government stall be tonsidered- ____1n_tne_instant_cae,_tne_compensa tion was Only lodged in 206, = anaes the passing of RA GUS}. thereto the sume should tne _ principal basis Of compu tation. “aa—__Nocar_vs + balley frames» 6RNo- 199 844, dugust 1a, 2013, Peralta. J: ___ PROS: _Petifiontr filed O ase agains galled} trames ond its Owner ie i Was dismis i e. ____the lanor_grbiler foun the respondent guilty of illegal diimisal ___2n0._anarded_petitioner_witn Oamages- Nadir then filed for reco He Ih ime ________0f hid illegal dismissal on $997 unfl 2003 with interest. the La denied ____ the sam arguing that fe computation chould only be grom 4999 ty $998 when the LA render its dedsien. SUE. jeri uly 1 have 12 interes tno ager Shall have tr tale Hence, petitioner is granted 6 Come LaNoble vo- “ci o manila, ¢R No~ wate PN Ne AC ee | ____ 4S: contrad_was entered _intn_sSose_Syquia and the respondent. the ______ormer_enall_ tease a schod|_builaing. to tne later tora period of nop _________ moe shan 3 Years. cit a_mothly_(ental_of P «09-09. the respondent __ a ___Palted t0 pay tie sh ulated rent conesponding tr the month of te- ee tawny 4934 ang hence, peitiona: Filed _a case fer the purchge of _____ the tnuilding with legal tn terest tere from from tne filing of the ____bomplaint + Respnaent, onthe otner hand, prayed for rescisslonand _ expropriation Ee eat TSUES whether or nol ie respond ert Can rer ase Tegapiation? HELD: No, 1es(lendent has no_righ +0 expro priate ard Should comply — tty he teams op the_concaick_ord_pay ne Pondenrend | 2 rain tecrocelionate Power of the Stake, hod enabie it tofor- Cibly_acquire_griva’ lands intended or public we upon pay- __ _____ ment _of just compensation to tne _owner- Opvousty, tree & fo need t0_2x ped onic whee tne owner ts willing tp sell yuder te __ ______tums_alse_ceeep tae to the purchosee, tn sshion Cae, 90 erdicmy eee | _____ ed Of SA nay _be_ogreed_upon_by tre parte.ind meno sae onniiaer ee ltonaare. GR No 135821, i ME $3, 2043, villorqma try J. __FAGS: Respondent is the owner Of & parcels OF land _aevoied fo Coco- —_______ut_producion_in_fguan del Norte» was fonanted by Tagupa, In 06,_and_petig 1m Spouses Cthe_lenanis). Pursuant fo CARP, respon ——__—derwhintorily oped tostl the property ty OAR. DAR Gnd petitioner _____Vdlued_h€_pwgaty ot P50, 25. 1t/hedare. kesponient rege ced ____ te low Valu gHion ana filed for just Compensation agginit ike LBA The SAC cume_yp_with {ait valuation of tre supiet property tabl- hg_nohce 64 the fact that the valve oF peso was low. LBPoves {Not 4he_cornpensation fixed _by sAc_villaied Sec. 14 of RAGGSF. ___ISSuE:_Wwneth@r_or net SACs computation for falr yauation isacepkd? HELO. No, it connot be acegpted. while the aekrmihahon oy justcom- pensahion is ecentially G judicidl punction vesttd in the RTC co~ fing O$ the SC, the age_Cannot_abuse_his discretion _by —____hol_ tating Tnte_full consi dtiahon 1h@ factors cpedificaly identi= ________tite_by_Jawt_ond_impte menting cues. aes —__ the _aevatuation of P20 inci one of the foctoe ppeew| th Sec 1 0f RA LOS whith Mal counts ae tequitd fo Consieer nave mining the Ombount_of just * a