You are on page 1of 3
Vt Y eB SHAHZAD ASSOCIATES CONSULTING ARCHITECTS, ENGINEERS & PLANNERS EEE oo nce er Ref No: SA/09/588 Date: 21-07-2009 Engr. Amir Saeed Project Director (Sports) university of Karachi, Karachi. “PROVISIONS OF SPORTS FACILITIES (REHABILITATION OF CRICKET GROUND & RENOVATION OF SQUASH COURT) TENDER SCRUTINY REPORT : Dear Sir, sued to Eleven (11) Contractors, only Six (06) fenders were received-by us on ‘ontracting firms and the amount The tender for the project were Is participated in the competition. The original t 53° june 2009 for scrutiny. The names of the ‘quoted by them are given below. a scrutiny: Position: 1 tender opening statements be! AMOUNT AFTER S#| NAMEOF CONTRACTORS | REBATE | RepaTe (PKR) POSITION o1. | M/s. Khalid Jamal Constructor : 2,963,758.00 Lowest 02. | M/S. Pentagrams 10% 3,033,106.20 24 Lowest | ene 03. | M/S. Tak Engineering Services 04. | M/S. Concraft Pakistan 7 4,143,453.23 4" Lowest 05. | M/S. Modern Dynamic Associates : 4,156,329.90 5 Lowest 06. | M/S. Warsi Enterprises - 15,204,525.00 6 Lowest am Cont. Tart arte SHAHZAD ASSOGIATES scrutiny and checking of calculations, the bid amount changed as given below: AMOUNT AFTER s#| NAMEOFCONTRACTORS | REBATE |‘Depare (PKR) | POSITION 01. | M/S. Khalid Jamal Constructor - 3,047,358.17 Lowest 02. | M/S. Pentagrams 10% 3,120,991.14 | 2" Lowest 03. | M/s. Tak Engineering Services - 3,188,531.46 | 3° Lowest 04, | M/s. Concraft Pakistan - 4,231,833.23 | 4 oe 05. | M/S. Modern Dynamic Associates : 4,656,320.63 | 5" Lowest 06, | m/s. Warsi Enterprise: : 13,882,386.53 | 6" Lowest ‘The difference in the total tendered cost of different Contractors is given below. s# DIFFERENCE BETWEEN AMOUNT (PKR) PERCENTAGE 01. | 1" and 2% Lowest 73,632.97 2.35% 02, | 2% and 3" Lowest 67,540.32 2.11% 03. | 3" and 4" Lowest 1,043,301.77 24.65% 04, | 4 and 5 Lowest 424,487.40 9.11% 05. | 5 and 6™ Lowest 9,226,065.90 150.46% OBSERVATIONS: 1 M/S. Khalid Jamal Constructor are the 1* lowest tenderer. Their bid amount has increased from Rs. 2,963,758.00 to Rs. 3,047,358.41 (difference Rs. +83,600.41) but their position has not changed after scrutiny. They are approximately 2.35% lower than 2" bidder. Cuttings in quoted rates have been ‘observed on Summary Page ‘B’. M/S. Pentagrams are the 2" lowest tender. Their bid amount has increased from Rs. 3,033,106.20 to Rs. 3,120,991.14 (difference Rs. +87,884.94) due to calculations errors but their position has not changed after scrutiny. They are approximately 4.01% lower than 3° bidder. Cont. HAHZAD ASSOCIATES M/S. Tak Engineering Services are the 3° lowest tenderer. Their bid amount has Increased from Rs. 3,093,080.00 to Rs. 3,188,531.46 (difference Rs. +95,451.46) but their position has. not changed after scrutiny. They are approximately 24.65% lower than 4" bidder. M/S. Concraft Pakistan are the 4" lowest tenderer. Their bid amount has increased from Rs. 4,143,453.00 to Rs. 4,231,833.23 (difference Rs. +88,380.23) due to calculations errors but their position has not changed after scrutiny. They are approximately 9.11% lower than 5" bidder. Cuttings and Over writing in quoted rates have been observed on Cricket Ground BOQ Page No. 1. M/S. Modern Dynamic Associates are the 5 lowest tenderer. Their bid amount has increased from Rs. 4,156,329.90 to Rs. 4,656,320.63 (difference Rs. +499,991.13) due to calculations errors but their position has not changed after scrutiny. They are approximately 150.46% lower than 6" bidder. Over writing and cutting in quoted rates have been observed on Cricket Ground BOQ Page No. 1. M/S. Warsi Enterprises are the 6 lowest tenderer. Their bid amount has decreased from Rs. 15,204,525.00 | to Rs. 13,882,386.53 (difference Rs. -1,322,138.47) due to calculations errors but their position has not changed after scrutiny. ‘RECOMMENDATION: Though the bid of M/S. Khalid Jamal Constructor is the lowest, but it is 13.14% higher than the Estimated Cost. The tender have been further reviewed and it has been noticed that the rates quoted by them are higher in comparison to the prevalent market rates. They may be asked to offer additional rebate in the interest of Project, so that overall cost is further reduced, It is recommended that after rebate the work may be awarded to them. We are returning herewith original tenders (6 Nos) of the above noted tenderers, duly scrutinized by us. This is for your information and further necessary action. Thanking You, Yours Faithfully, For SHAHZAD ASSOCIATES (AKMACJAMAL) CC. Director (PAD) University of Karachi. Enclosed: 1. Annexure - A, Tender Opening Statement 2. Annexure - 8, Tender Scrutiny Statement 3. Original Tenders (06 Nos.) 4, Comparative Statement ~\

You might also like