Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Action Research As Masters Thesis
Action Research As Masters Thesis
This is an excerpt from my book: A Short Guide to Action Research (4th ed) (2012),
published by Pearson Education
juried academic journals (see your advisor if you have questions here). It takes time to read,
take notes, and synthesize all the material you read; thus, allow plenty of time for this stage.
Some graduate students try to take shortcuts at this stage; however, I have found that these
shortcuts always end up being “long cuts.”
6. Create a preliminary outline for your literature review. An outline is used to
help you find a logical structure. This structure is like the frame of a house and is used to hold
your ideas together. Some like to use an inverted triangle that goes from most general to most
specific. For example, if I were writing a paper on gifted learners and reading in the
elementary school, I would use the following sections: (1) gifted learners, (2) reading in the
elementary school, and (3) gifted learners and reading in the elementary school.
7. Begin to plan how you will collect data. Teachers often use a pilot study in their
class to experiment with and refine several data collection methods before selecting those
they will use. Keep in mind that your data collection must be well planned and systematic.
8. Plan on revising each chapter at least four times. Revision is what separates
good writing from average writing. Revision is at the heart of writing of any kind.
9. Assume the reader knows nothing. Adopt a teaching, describing mode. The
reader should know exactly what you are doing and why, and be able to replicate your
procedures.
Abstract
The abstract is a brief summary of the thesis, study, or journal
article. Its purpose is to give readers a very concise overview.
For a thesis you should include (a) the purpose or problem; (b)
pertinent information about participants; (c) pertinent information
about the methodology; and (d) basic findings, conclusions, and
recommendations. You have a limited number of words here. Most
abstracts are between 150 and 250 words. Use as few words as
possible. Sample abstracts are included in the next section.
CHAPTER I
INTRODUCTION
1.Introduction to the topic (no heading for this section)
A.Identify the problem or area of interest.
B.Provide background information.
2.Purpose Statement (heading, centered, boldface)
A. State purpose of paper/study. Example: The purpose of this paper was
to examine the writing workshop in my second grade and to describe
effective implementation practices.
B.Put the purpose in the form of one or more questions. Example: The
specific research questions are . . .
1.What is happening during my writing workshop?
2.Is the writing workshop effective in developing my students’ writing
skills?
3.If so, how should the writing workshop be implemented in a primary
grade setting?
3.Importance of the Study (heading, centered, boldface)
A.Tell why this study is important.
CHAPTER II
REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE
1.This builds the foundation for your thesis. Here you provide
background information to support your question or to put your
research topic in a theoretical context. Also, you want to see what
others have found related to your topic that may be of use in your
action research.
2.Gather material. Consider using 25–40 sources. Use current, peer-
reviewed journal articles whenever possible.
3.After reading each piece, take notes listing the citation at the top
and only those items of importance below. Use headings whenever
possible. This will make it easier to organize your notes.
4.Begin thinking about the structure. Some people like to web or
outline to find structure initially. As data in the form of your
notes are gathered, begin to look for categories. Your initial
structures should be very flexible because they most likely will
change.
5.As you write this chapter, use headings and subheadings to break up
the text. It is very hard to read several pages of text without
headings.
6.Describe empirical research related to your topic. When describing
research studies, try to use one or two sentences to describe each of
the following: (1) the question or purpose of the study, (2) the
number and type of participants, (3) the treatment or conditions
involved,(4) the type of measures, and (5) the results and
conclusions.
7.This chapter ends with a brief summary of the major points covered
that is generally about one paragraph in length. Sometimes the
summary is put in list form with each point cited.
CHAPTER III
METHODOLOGY
1.Participants (heading, centered, boldface)
A.Describe the people involved. The reader should know ages, number,
gender, ethnic makeup, and anything else you feel is pertinent to
your research.
B.Describe the environment: classroom, school, or community.
2.Materials (heading, centered, boldface)
A.Describe any materials used in your research. If you are using a
particular curriculum, product, or procedure describe it fully.
Include relevant examples in an appendix. Remember that the reader
knows nothing.
B.Describe all types of measuring devices. If surveys, checklists,
rubrics, or rating charts are used, describe them briefly, then
include a sample in the appendix.
3.Procedures (heading, centered, boldface)
A.Describe the length of the study.
B.Describe how you collected the data, how much, and how often.
C.Use past tense in describing all aspects of your methodology and
findings. Research always exists in the past, in a specific time and
place.
D.If you use a special curriculum, technique, or procedure, let the
reader know exactly what it is. This section should be described in
such a way that one could pick up this chapter and replicate your
procedures.
CHAPTER IV
FINDINGS
1.Restate your research questions.
2.Describe the data that answer that question (this chapter is often
the longest chapter in an action research thesis).
3.Describe the themes, categories, and patterns.
4.Use illustrative examples for each category.
5.Use tables, graphs, figures, and artwork as necessary.
6.Use headings and subheadings to make the structure readily apparent.
CHAPTER V
DISCUSSION
1.Overview of the Study (heading, centered, boldface)
A.Restate the general purpose of the study.
B.Briefly describe how the results were obtained.
2.Summary of Findings (heading, centered)
A.Provide a brief summary of the findings.
B.This may be one to two paragraphs.
3.Conclusions (heading, centered, boldface)
A.Move beyond the data. Tell what these results mean.
B.Describe possible implications of the results.
4.Recommendations (heading, centered, boldface)
A.Describe how the results might be used in your classroom.
B.Describe how the results may be used to bring understanding to other
classrooms or situations.
C.Sometimes the conclusions and recommendations merge.
5.Limitations of the Study (heading, centered, boldface)
A.Describe things that may have hindered or affected your findings.
B.Describe things that you needed to change during the study, or things
that did not go as expected. Remember, a good study is not one that
proves your particular point; rather, a good study is one that looks
carefully, reports accurately, and fairly represents the bit of
reality that you experienced.
C.Describe the limitations or applicability of the findings. For
example, your recommendations might be applied only to a certain
segment of the population. Also, were you able to look at all facets
of the problem?
D.Describe ideas for future research related to your research.
EXAMPLES OF ABSTRACTS
Below are some examples of Abstracts used for master’s theses. Other examples can
be found at my website www.AR-Johnson.com.
Elizabeth Smalligan,
Abstract
This action research study investigated the effects of technology on
the interest and performance of second and third grade students in a
social studies classroom at Battle Creek Christian School in Battle
Creek, Michigan. The participants were nine second grade students and
eight third grade students who were part of a combined elementary
Tina Williams
Abstract
The purpose of this qualitative study was to understand the factors
influencing families to choose homeschooling as the primary method of
education for their children. This research was conducted with 42
families who participated in homeschooling and resided within the
Jefferson County Public School district located in Louisville,
Kentucky. Data was collected through 16 parent questionnaires, nine
parent interviews, and 26 on-line group forum discussion boards. Data
was gathered to determine the participants’ views and experiences with
homeschooling including their decision making processes, the perceived
benefits and challenges associated with homeschooling, and student
attitudes towards their education. The results indicated that the
participants perceived the benefits of homeschooling outweigh the
challenges, students attitudes towards their education are more
positive when schooling was done at home, and a majority of the
participants experienced dissatisfaction with some aspect of school as
one reason they initiated homeschooling. These findings are some of the
factors influencing parents to homeschool. Public school teachers,
principals, and administrators should examine why parents are choosing
homeschooling in place of public schooling and adjust their policies,
teaching methods, and procedures to best fit the needs of the public
they serve.
Teri Randolph
Abstract
Varied academic ability is a problem in almost every teacher’s
classroom. Thus, it makes it difficult for the teacher to reach every
child. Therefore, we are presented with the “sink or swim” mentality
in regards to our students. Usually the students we find sinking are
the lower performing students who are labeled as non-proficient. The
focus of this research was to examine if using differentiated
instruction to teach math concepts affects the academic performance of
third graders, at Maynard Elementary in Knoxville, Tennessee, scoring
non-proficient in math. To address this issue I used differentiated
instruction in a small group setting with three third graders who were
classified as non-proficient in math. The intervention occurred as a
result of the ThinkLink Assessment that was administered in December to
determine the math needs of the students. Students who score non-
proficient were in the targeted intervention group. In the small group,
students received differentiated math instruction while incorporating
their learning preferences to help tailor small group lessons. The