Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Contents
Introduction.................................................................................................................................................2
Asaduddin Owaisi said that bringing the Uniform Civil Code (UCC) will "kill" the diversity and
plurality of India......................................................................................................................................6
BIBLIOGRAPHY.......................................................................................................................................9
Introduction
“Religion is so deep rooted in India , that it has even defeated the Supreme law of Land.”
The war between the Constitution of India and the personal laws has still not settled. The fear of
bloodshed , hate speeches and communal riots is a obstacle in the implementation of Uniform
Civil Code. Article 44 provides that “The State shall Endeavour to secure for the citizens a
uniform civil code throughout the territory of India.” Article 44 of Part IV wants to
replace personal laws based on the scriptures and customs of each major religious community in
India with a common set of rules governing every citizen i.e. Uniform Civil Code. Its particular
goal is towards the achievement of gender justice.
Uniform Civil Code means same set of secular civil laws for all the citizens. It will supersede the
right to be governed by personal laws. These laws are distinguished from public law and cover
marriage, divorce, inheritance, adoption and maintenance. However, even after the completion of
Six decades , such a code has failed to be implemented.
Personal laws were first framed during the British Raj, mainly for Hindu and Muslim citizens. A
uniform civil code will help the cause of national integration
The demand for a Uniform Civil Code was first put forward by women activists in the beginning
of the twentieth century, with the objective of women’s right , equality and secularism. Even
though the state has not yet made any efforts to introduce a uniform civil code in India, the
judiciary has recognized the necessity of uniformity in the application of civil laws to marriage,
succession, adoption, divorce, maintenance, etc. The current scenario might be slightly different
on paper but the harsh reality has not changed on ground zero. Be it the crime against women or
their rights, there has been very little or no progress at all. Implementation of UCC will end
patriarchal society and violence against women.
The Shani Shingnapur temple trust allowed women to enter the sanctum sanctorum, breaking the
tradition followed for several decades following the directive given by the Bombay high court in
2016.
In the Sarla Mudgal and ors. v. UOI 2 it was held that the second marriage would be invalid
inless and until the first marriage is dissolved by decree under the Hindu Marriage Act. In this
case the husband had converted himself to muslim religion from Hindu religion and observed
polygamy.
Hence such cases show the mark of a uniform code disregarding the biased religious practices.
Article 25 guarantees Right to freedom of religion. It grants freedom to every citizen of India to
profess, practice and propagate his own religion. The constitution, in the preamble professes to
secure to all its citizen’s liberty of belief, faith and worship. However, Article 44 which embodies
the principle of one civil code for all citizens is considered to be a violation of Article 25.
Religious freedom, in the eyes of the Court, does not only mean being allowed to practice one’s
customs. It also has to mean that some of these customs must have legal significance. But why ?
Religious. freedom is the freedom to practice one’s beliefs.3 The Shah bano case and Shayra
Bano case are some examples wherein Article 44 was preferred over article 25 by the courts.
Uniform Civil Code essentially means unifying all the “personal laws” to have one set of secular
laws that will apply to all citizens of India irrespective of the community they belong to.It has to
be understood by the communal parties that the Right to freedom of religion will not get violated
by article 44 as both the articles seek to achieve secularism.
In this case the question was raised regarding the liability of Muslim husband to maintain his
divorced wife beyond the period of iddat, if the wife is not able to maintain herself. I was by
Supreme Court that:
1. Section 125 of the code is truly secular in character. It was enacted to provide quick and
summary remedy to the class of persons who are unable to maintain themselves.
2. Irrespective of the person being of any religion sec 125 is applicable because it is a part of
Criminal Procedure Court and not Civil Laws.
3. Neglect by a person of sufficient means to not give maintenance to any dependants leads to
invoking of 125.
4. The rights conferred by Section 125 can be exercised irrespective of Personal Law of the
Parties.
5. In this case Husband Liabilities to provide maintenance doesn’t get limited into the foundation
of time period of Iddat but as long as the wife is unable to maintain herself or remarried even
though Iddat period is over.
Shah Bano’s case was challenged in this case and it was a controversial maintenance lawsuit
in India, in which the Supreme court delivered a judgment favoring maintenance given to an
aggrieved divorced Muslim woman. the Supreme Court of India interpreted the act in a manner
reassuring the validity of the case and consequently upheld the Shah Bano judgement and The
Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act 1986 was nullified. Many Muslims
In this case a woman belonging to the Khasi Tribe, a Christian, married S.S Chopra under the
Christian Marriage Act, 1872 and later sought a decree of nullity under the Divorce Act, 1869.It
was held in this case the unsatisfactory state of affairs consequent on the lack of a uniform civil
code.
Asaduddin Owaisi said that bringing the Uniform Civil Code (UCC) will "kill" the diversity and
plurality of India.7
In India, a country with diverse languages and traditions, expecting people of diverse culture and
traditions to act on the same laws, based on a uniform system is somewhat preposterous.
The argument is based on the fact that India takes pride in its integrity within diversity. For
maintaining diversity, we need to respect every minority communities personal choices and laws.
That is what has led this nation to live in peace for such a long duration of time.
The Muslim community vehemently opposes the move by the government and they all say that
UCC would violate their personal laws gravely and would thus result in irreversible damage to
their religion and the laws therein.
The minority communities often feel that the majority personal laws would be codified
uniformly which will somewhere hinder their recognisition and representation in the
country .
Triple Talaq also known as talaq-e-biddat is a form of Islamic divorce which includes the
practice of a muslim man to legally divorce his wife by stating the word talaq three times
in oral,written or more recently,electronic form.This practice has been very controversial
as it violates the concept of gender justice.
After a long span of controversies ,the Supreme Court in the historic judgement of
Shayara Bano’s Case8 banned the practice of triple talaq and held this practice as
unconstitutional and against the teachings of Islam.
In this particular case,the 36 year old Shayara Bano approached the court as her husband
sent her a letter with talaq written thrice and left her. The petitions of 4 other women
Ishrat Jahan,Gulshan Parween,Aafreen Rehman ,Atiya Sabri were tagged with Bano’s
petition.The 6th petitioner was Bhartiya Muslim Mahila Andolan.
The Judiciary once again reminded the Parliament that there is an urgent need of
implementing UCC to do away with practices of triple talaq and halala which violates
The process of preparing and implementing the uniform civil code should be a
legislative function rather than judicial
Conclusion
The Indian State has the necessary statutory bedrock for the implementation of the Uniform Civil
Code and it should be enforced. It will lead to true equality among the citizens as its existence
will strengthen gender justice, without which there can be no equality at all.
Women empowerment in core areas like social status, gender bias, health, security and
empowerment are of urgent necessity. Article 44 expects from the State to secure a Uniform
Civil Code for all citizens of India. There is no Uniform Civil Code in India but a Uniform
Criminal Code exists. The Criminal law is equally applicable to all citizens irrespective of their
religious affiliation. However in the case of civil law particularly in the matter of personal laws
there is no uniformity.
The law is relating to marriage, divorce, maintenance, guardianship and succession governing
the Hindus, Muslims and Christians etc., is different and varies from one religion to other. This is
the time to discuss all the personal law of every community with the various judgments of the
Supreme Court of India where the apex court has suggested to the Central Government for the
enactment of a Uniform Civil Code.
It is necessary to emphasise that the word "uniform" in the uniform civil code is not meant to
homogenise the lifestyles and identities of Indian citizens but to ensure that certain fundamental
rights to equality and liberty are protected for them by the Indian state.9
BOOKS