The Steel Construction Institute Institut dela Construction Métalique Institut fur Stahibau Istituto di Costruzioni in Acciaio Instituto de la Construccion MetalicaL5ZZ_ZD is We Steel Construction Institute. Its aim is to promote and .—<< develop the proper and effective use of steel in construction. Membership is open to all organisations and individuals that are concerned with the use of steel in construction, and members include designers, contractors, suppliers, fabricators, academics and government departments in the United Kingdom, elsewhere in Europe and in countries around the world. SCI is financed by subscriptions from its members, by revenue from research contracts and consultancy services and by the sales of publications. ‘SCI’s work is initiated and guided through the involvement of its members on advisory groups and technical committees. A specialist advisory and consultancy service is available free to members on the use of steel in construction. SCI’s research and development activities cover many aspects of steel construction including multi-storey construction, industrial buildings, use of steel in housing, development of design guidance on the use of stainless steel and cold formed steel, behaviour of steel in fire, fire engineering, use of steel in barrage and tunnel schemes, bridge engineering, offshore engineering, and development of structural analysis systems. Further information is given in the SCI prospectus available free on request from: ‘The Membership and Council Secretary, The Steel Construction Institute, Silwood Park, Ascot, Berkshire, SLS 7QN. Telephone: (0344) 23345, Fax: (0344) 22944. Although care has been taken to ensure, to the best of our knowledge, that all data and information contained herein are accurate to the extent that they relate to either matters of fact or accepted practice or matters of opinion at the time of publication, The Steel Construction Institute, the authors and the reviewers assume no responsibility for any errors in or misinterpretations of such data and/or information or any loss or damage arising from or related to their use. This publication has been reviewed by the BCSA Fabricators’ Technical Committee and is published with the support of The British Constructional Steelwork Association Limited Publications supplied to the Members of the Institute at a discount are not for resale by them. © The Steel Construction Institute 1994 Instituut voor Staalbouwconstructie Institut de la Construction Métallique Institut fiir Stahlbau _ Institutet for Stalbyggnad oetimato a) Constaeae etate Istituto di Costruzioni in Acciaio Ivortrobro Liénpav xaTaoKevav Instituto de la Construccién Metélica Staalkonstruktion Institut‘SCI PUBLICATION 121 Composite Beam Design to Eurocode 4 Based on DD ENV 1994-1-1: 1994 Eurocode 4: Design of composite steel and concrete structures: Part 1.1: General rules and rules for buil ings with reference to the UK National Application Document RM Lawson BSc (Eng), PhD, ACGI, CEng, MICE, MiStructE F Chung BEng, PhD, DIC ISBN 1 870004 86 8 A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library © The Steel Construction Institute 1994 The Steel Construction Institute Silwood Park, Ascot Berkshire SL5 70N Telephone: 0344 23345 Fax: 0344 22944FOREWORD BS ENV 1994: Eurocode 4: Part 1.1 Design of composite steel and concrete structures, general rules and rales for building was published in 1994. It is intended that designers will become familiar with all Eurocodes during their ENV (or ‘draft for development’) period, prior to achieving EN (or ‘standard’) status, ‘The Steel Construction Institute and other organisations are in the process of preparing design guides to assist users of the Eurocodes during the ENV period, and this guide is the first to be published on Eurocode 4, concentrating on the design of composite beams. It is a companion to the SCI publication Design of composite slabs and beams with steel decking which refers to BS 5950: Part 3: Section 3.1 (published in 1990). In order to assist familiarity, Eurocode 4 terminology and symbols have been used wherever possible. ‘Comparable symbols in BS 5950: Part 3 are given in the Notation (page ‘The publication was prepared by Dr R M Lawson and Dr K F Chung of the SCI with the assistance of members of BSI Committee 525/4 and BCSA Ltd. The design example (Appendix A) was prepared by Mr D M Osafo and the Design Tables by Dr K F Chung. Comments on the draft document were made by: Dr CN Hampton Richard Lees Ltd Mr K Leah Henry Brooks Ltd Dr D Anderson University of Warwick ‘The work leading to the publication was funded by The Department of Trade & Industry through Eureka Project 130A and from the Eureka CIMsteel project. Information concerning the manufacturers of decking and shear connectors is given in Appendix B. References to the Code Clauses of Eurocode 4: Part 1.1 have been made with permission of BSI. Complete copies of the Standard can be obtained by post from BSI Standards, Linford Wood, Milton Keynes MK14 OLE. This publication forms one of the deliverables of the CIMsteel project.CONTENTS Page SUMMARY v NOTATION vii 1 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1. Scope of publication 1 1.2 Partial safety factors 2 1.3. Cross-referencing rE a MATERIAL PROPERTIES 3 21 Structural steel 3 2.2 Profiled steel decking 3 2.3 Concrete 4 2.4 — Reinforcement 4 2.5 Shear connectors 5 3. BASIS OF DESIGN - COMPOSITE SLABS 6 3. Definition 6 3.2 Construction condition 6 3.3 Composite condition 8 3.4 Fire resistance 10 4, BASIS OF DESIGN - COMPOSITE BEAMS 4 4.1 Construction condition u 4.2 Effective breadth of slab 1 4.3 Plastic analysis of composite section 12 4.4 — Shear resistance 14 4.5 Shear connection 15 4.6 — Full and partial shear connection 7 4.7 Influence of deck shape 21 4.8 Transverse reinforcement 23 5. SERVICEABILITY LIMIT STATES. 25 5.1 General criteria 25 5.2 Calculation of deflections 25 5.3. Stress checks 28 5.4 Vibration check 29 5.5 Span to depth ratio 29 5.6 Crack control 29 6. FIRE RESISTANCE 31 7. COMMENTARY ON DESIGN TABLES FOR COMPOSITE BEAMS 32 71 General information 32 7.2. Introduction to uniform load cases 34 7.3 Introduction to point load cases 37 7.4 Use of the tables for typical design cases 38 7.5 Comparison of designs to different codes 39 iii8. DESIGN TABLES 43 REFERENCES 112 APPENDIX A: Design Example 115 APPENDIX B: Sources of information 134 ivSUMMARY This publication reviews the method of design of composite slabs and beams to BS ENV 1994 Eurocode 4: Part 1.1. Design Tables are presented to aid rapid selection of the steel beams, depending on the span and the loading, the depth of the concrete slab and the shape of the deck profile used. Because of the number of variables, a total of 64 Design Tables for both uniform and point load cases are included. Generic deck profiles are used to cover the main design cases and these are typical of the principal deck profiles used in the UK. The mode of failure of the beams, as given by the relevant requirement of Eurocode 4, is also indicated in the Design Tables. ‘The design method of Eurocode 4 is based on plastic section analysis principles for Class 1 and 2 sections. The scope of this publication is restricted to simply supported beams. Checks are made on both the ultimate limit state and the serviceability behaviour of the composite beams. Design is often controlled by the deflection limits or by the minimum degree of shear connection permitted in Eurocode 4. A worked example is also included to illustrate the design of a typical composite beam to Burocode 4. Berechnung von Verbundtriigern nach Eurocode 4. ‘Zusammenfassung Diese Verdjfentlichung gibt einen Uberblick ber die Berechnung von Verbunddecken und - tragern nach BS ENV 1994 Eurocode 4, Teil 1.1. Bemessungstabellen werden vorgestellt, die eine schnelle Auswahl von Stahltragern in Abhdngigkeit der Spannweite, Belastung, Dicke der Betondecke und des verwendeten Deckenprofils erlauben. Aufgrund der Anzahl der Variablen gibt es insgesamt 64 Tabellen, sowohl flar Gleichstreckenlasten als auch fir Punktlasten. Die hier verwendeten Deckenprofile decken die wichtigsten Berechnungsfalle ab und sind gleichzeitig die am haufigsten verwendeten Profile in GB. Die Versagensart der Triger, entsprechend Eurocode 4, ist in den Tabellen ebenfalls angegeben. Die Berechningsmethode nach Eurocode 4 beruht auf der plastischen Bemessung der Querschnitte der Klassen I und 2. Der Anwendungsbereich dieser Verdffentlichung ist beschrénkt auf Einfeldtrager. Nachweise werden im Grenzeustand der Tragfahigkeit und der Gebrauchsfithigkeit gefihrt. Ma gebend wird hierbei oftdie Durchbiegungsbeschrankung oder der Mindest-Verdiibelungsgrad nach Eurocode 4. Ein Berechnungsbeispiel illustriert die Berechnung eines Verbundtrdgres nach Eurocode 4. ‘Dimensionnement des poutres mixtes selon I'Eurocode 4 Résumé La publication est consacrée @ la méthode de dimensionnement des poutres et dalles mixtes préconisée dans la BS ENV 1994 Eurocode 4 - Partie 1.1. Des tables de dimensionnement permettant un choix rapide des poutres en acier en fonction de la portée, du chargement, de I'épaisseur de la dalle en ‘béton et du type de profil en acier utilisé, sont proposées. La publication contient, au total, 64 tables de dimensionnement, tenant compte des diverses variables du probleme. Les types de profils en acier couverts par les tables sont ceux généralement utilisés au Royaume-Uni. Le mode de ruine des ‘poutres est également donné dans les tables, comme indiqué par les régles de I'Eurocode 4. La méthode de dimensionnement proposée dans I'Eurocode 4 est basée sur le principe d'une analyse plastique pour les sections des classes 1 et 2. Cette publication ne couvre que le cas des poutres simplement appuyées. Les vérifications portent tant sur les états limites que sur le comportement en service des poutres mixtes. Le dimensionnement est souvent contrélé par les fleches limites ou par le degré minimal de liaison en cisaillement autorisé par l'Eurocode 4. Un exemple de dimensionnement est proposé pour illustrer l'utilisation de la méthode.Disefio de vigas mixtas de acuerdo con el Eurocédigo 4 Resumen Esta publicacion repasa el método de disefo de acuerdo con la norma BS ENV 1994 Eurocédigo 4 Parte 1.1. Se incluyen tablas para facilitar la rdpida seleccién de las vigas de acero, dependiendo de la luz y la carga, el espesor de la capa de hormigén y la forma de la chapa a usar. Debido al nimero de variables, se presentan un total de 64 tablas de diseto tanto para cargas puntuales como para cargas repartidas uniformemente. Se han empleado perfiles de chapas genéricos para cubrir los casos de diseio mas comunes, siendo éstos muy habituales en Gran Bretafia. El tipo de fallo de la viga, tal como se describe en el Eurocédigo 4, también se indica en las tablas de diseio. El método de disetio del Eurocddigo 4 se basa en los principios de andlisis de secciones pldsticas de las clases Ty 2. Elalcance de esta publicacién abarca tinicamente las vigas simplemente apoyadas. Se ha ‘comprobado tanto los estados limites tltimos como los estados de servicio de las vigas compuestas. El disefto esté dominado normalmente por tas flechas limites o por el grado minimo de unién a cortante permitido en el Eurocédigo 4. Para ilustrar el disefio de una viga mixta segiin el Eurocédigo 4 se ha incluido un ejemplo resuelto. Progettazione di travi composte in accordo con I'Eurocodice 4 Sommario Questa pubblicazione esamina il metodo di progetto di travi e solette compaste secondo la norma BS ENV 1994 Eurocodice 4, Parte 1.1. Gli abachi progettuali riportati rendono possibile una rapida sselecione sia della trave in acciaio, in funzione della luce e del tipo di carico, sia dell'altezza della ssoletta in conglomerato e del profilo di lamiera grecata. A causa del gran numero di parametri in igioco nella progetiazione di questi elementi composti sono state incluse 64 tabelle riferite alle condizioni di carico uniformemente distribuito e di carico concentrato. Profili di lamiera di tipo ‘generico sono utilizzati per le principal applicazioni progettuali; le sezioni considerate sono comunque tipiche dei piu’ comuni profili di lamiera usati ne! Regno Unito. Anche le modalita’ di collasso delle travi, in accordo con i principali requisiti dell'Eurocodice 4, sono indicate nelle tabelle progettuali. Il metodo di progetto dell'Eurocodice 4 e' basato sui principi del calcolo plastico per le sezioni in classi 1 e 2. Lo scopo di questa pubblicazione e' limitato alle travi in semplice appoggio. Le verifiche sulle travi composte sono condotte riferendosi sia allo stato limite ultimo sia al comportamento in condizioni di esercizio. La progettazione risulta spesso governata dai limiti di deformabilita’ o dal minimo grado di interazione a taglio del collegamento trave-soletta consentito dall'Eurocodice 4. Un esempio completo e' anche riportato allo scopo di illustrare il progetto di una tipica trave composta in accordo con l'Eurocodice 4 Utformning och dimensionering av samverkansbalk enligt Eurocode 4 a fattn! Denna publikation beskriver dimensioneringsmetoden for samverkansbalkar enligt BS ENV 1994 Eurocode 4: Part 1.1. Dimensioneringstabeller presenteras for art underlatta ett snabbt val av stdlprofil, beroende pd spannvidd, last, tjocklek pd betongplattan samt vilken typ av samverkansplat ‘som anviinds. Pé grund av det stora antalet variabler redovisas toralt 64 tabeller for lastfallen jamnt utbredd belastning och punktlast. De vanligaste plétprofilerna i Storbritannien har tagits med for att tticka in de flesta dimensioneringsfallen. Balkarnas brottyp, baserad pé foreskrifterna i Eurocode 4, anges ocksa i dimensioneringstabellerna. Dimensioneringsmetoden i Eurococde 4 dr baserad pa plastisk tvarsnittsanalys i tvdrsnittsklass 1 och 2. Denna publikation omfattar endast fritt upplagda balkar. Kontroll av bade brotistadiet och bruksstadiet ar utford pa samverkansbalkarna. Nedbojningsbegrinsningar eller minsta grad av skjusforbingning enligt Eurocode 4 dr ofta avgdrande vid dimensioneringen. Ett beriikningsexempel r inkluderat for att illustrera dimensioneringen av en typisk samverkansbalk enligt Eurocode 4. viNOTATION EC4 Definition A cross-sectional area effective breadth of slab b, average trough width diameter of shear connector elastic modulus cylinder strength of concrete cube strength of concrete ultimate tensile strength of steel nominal tensile strength of steel action or force (general) permanent load height of steel section height of shear connector (note, also used as above) height of concrete slab above deck profile height of deck profile second moment of area length of beam or slab design value of moment resistance design value of applied moment modular ratio of steel to concrete number of shear connectors number of shear connectors for full shear connection resistance of a shear connector variable load resistance of element ratio of cross-sectional area of the steel section relative to the concrete section thickness shear force section modulus partial safety factor on loads partial safety factor on materials ‘(235/f,) dry det EONS RS OURS Sms. ge + RORezs vexge) single span loaded to 1,5 kN/m? plus self-weight; adjacent spans not loaded. igle span pl fi Case a therefore corresponds to the maximum elastic moment at the supports, whereas Case b corresponds to the maximum elastic moment in mid-span. Loads exceeding these limits should not be applied until the slab has gained adequate strength. These requirements are similar to those of BS 5950: Part 4 except for the use of partial factors of 1,5 on construction loads and 1,35 on self weight in Eurocode 4. C4 Clause 34 73.2.1Q) UK NAD3.2.5 Strength design of decking ‘The design of steel decking is to be covered by Eurocode 3: Part 1.3" which relates to the design of thin steel! sections, decking and roof sheeting. It is similar in approach to BS 5950: Parts 5 and 6". The elastic moment resistance of the section is established taking account of the effective breadth of the thin steel elements in compression. Stiffeners (in the form of folds) are often introduced to reduce the width of the compression elements and to increase the effectiveness of the section. ‘The design of continuous decking is based, according to Eurocode 4, on an elastic distribution of moment for the load cases given in Section 3.2.4. No moment redistribution is permitted and the support (negative moment) conditions would normally be the controlling case. This condition represents a safe underestimate to the collapse load of the decking. Manufacturers often carry out full scale load tests to justify the use of higher load than given by Codes. 3.2.6 Deflection limits No deflection limits are specified in Eurocode 4 for the deflection of the deck after concreting, It is therefore suggested that the deflection limit of span/180 is used as given in BS 5950: Part 4‘ Increased deflections (up to span/130) are permitted if the additional weight of concrete due to the deflection of the decking is included in the design of the decking. 3.3 Composite condition Composite slabs are usually designed as simply supported members with failure normally occurring by slip between the decking and the concrete before the plastic ‘moment resistance of the composite section is reached. Eurocode 4 permits the design of continuous composite slabs by the provision of reinforcement in the negative moment region. A method is presented for provision of end anchors, but not for reinforcement in the positive moment region, acting in combination with the composite action of the decking. ‘Two methods of design of composite slabs are permitted by Eurocode 4. Both use test information on the ‘shear bond’ resistance of the slabs as a means of interpolating. to other design cases. The preferred method is that which has been traditionally used (the so-called ‘m’ and ‘k” method), and an alternative method based on the principles of partial shear connection is presented in Annex E of Eurocode 4. 3.3.1 Modes of ‘The ultimate moment resistance of composite slabs is determined by the breakdown of bond and mechanical interlock between the decking and the concrete, known as shear bond. This often occurs when slips (relative displacements) of 2-3 mm have occurred at the ends of the span. The load resistance of the slab is considerably greater than that given by initial slip, due to the performance of the embossments or indentations in the deck which cause the concrete to ‘ride-over’ these points. Re- entrant profiles restrict separation of the two materials giving improved shear bond performance. EC4 Clase 741 7421 1612If the slab is unpropped during construction then the deck resists the self-weight loads and subsequent loads are applied to the composite section. If the slab is propped then. all the loads are applied to the composite section, leading to a reduction in the imposed load that the slab can support. Even so, this shear bond action leads to imposed load resistances well in excess of that required in most buildings. ‘The vertical shear and punching shear resistance of the composite slab are assessed in accordance with Eurocode 2°) 3.3.2 Design by testing The performance of a particular deck profile used in a composite slab can only readily be assessed by testing. According to Eurocode 4 and BS 5950: Part 4, a minimum of 6 tests are required coveting the key design parameters (usually depth and span). The slabs are first subject to dynamic load between 50 and 150% of the target working load and later the load is increased statically to failure. The objective of the dynamic part of the test is to identify those cases where there is an inherently brittle bond between the concrete and the steel The test requirements are such that it is normally assumed that all loads are applied to the composite section. The test information is then presented in terms of empirical constants (m and k) that broadly define the mechanical interlock and chemical bond components of the resistance, respectively. The resistances are divided by a partial safety factor of 1,25 for shear bond action. Because of the empirical nature of the design of composite slabs, manufacturers normally present direct load-span design tables. It should be noted that, because of slight differences in the interpretation of the values of mand k, the values for these two empirical constants are not directly transferable between Codes. The alternative method in EC4 Annex E treats the shear bond resistance as analogous to the shear connection in a composite beam. A characteristic longitudinal shear resistance is defined, based on tests, which is then used in a modified partial shear connection analysis. Both methods give similar results within the range of test parameters used. 3.3.3 Ser Calculations of deflections in reinforced concrete slabs are notoriously conservative and designers often use simple rules to ensure that the serviceability performance is acceptable. The same approach may be adopted for composite slabs and the following general rules are proposed for the maximum span to depth ratio of the slabs using NWC and LWC. eability aspects NWC LWC ‘Simply supported slabs with mesh reinforcement 35 30 Continuous slabs end bay 38 33 - internal bay 40 35 The depth is the overall depth of the slab. Deflections should be calculated for designs outside these limits. No check need be made on the vibration of composite slabs. EC4 Clause 10.1 10.3.1.3, Annex E 7.6.2.23.4 Fire re: The fire resistance of composite slabs is covered in the forthcoming Eurocode 4: Part 1.2" In principle, this Code follows BS 5950: Part 8"). The minimum slab depth is controlled by the fire insulation requirements and the amount of reinforcement is determined from the load to be supported at the fire limit state. stance Eurocode 4: Part 1.2 presents the minimum slab depths in terms of an ‘average’ dimension depth, which leads to a slight reduction in slab depth in comparison to the requirements of BS 5950: Part 80°. A further 10% reduction in slab depth is permitted for lightweight concrete slabs because of the better insulating properties of the aggregate. The use of Simplified Design Tables is still permitted in the UK. Calculation procedures are presented in Eurocode 4: Part 1.2 for design cases outside the limits of test data”) upon which the Simplified Tables were prepared. For Scheme Design it may be assumed that a 130 mm slab depth will be adequate for up to 90 minutes fire resistance. Standard A142 or A193 mesh reinforcement may ‘be used depending on the span and loading configuration. 10 EC4 Clause ECA Pt. 43.1.24. BASIS OF DESIGN - COMPOSITE BEAMS ‘The structural system of a composite beam is essentially one of a series of parallel T beams with thin wide flanges. The concrete flange is in compression and the steel section is largely in tension. The forces between the two materials are transferred by shear connectors. The benefits of composite action are increased strength and stiffness, leading to economy in the size of steel beam used. 4.1 Construction condition In unpropped construction, the steel beam is sized first to support the self weight of the concrete slab and other construction loads before the concrete has gained adequate strength for composite action. No specific guidance is given in Eurocode 4 regarding the magnitude of this commun load used in the design of the steel beam. However, a load of 0,75 KN/m? is assumed to be applied to the entire area of steel decking and it would be logical to take this same load as applied to the beam. This load is treated as an imposed load. ‘The comparable figure in BS 5950: Part 3 is 0,5 KN/m?, which is the value recommended in the UK NAD. ‘The steel beam is then designed in accordance with Eurocode 3. Beams are assumed to be laterally restrained by the steel decking in cases where the decking spans perpendicular to the beam and is directly attached to them. Such beams can develop their full moment resistances. In cases where the decking spans parallel to the beam, lateral restraint is provided only by the beam to beam connections and the buckling resistance of the beam is based on the effective length of the beam between these points. 4.2 Effective breadth of slab In a T beam the contribution of the concrete flange is limited by the influence of ‘shear lag’ associated with in-plane strains across the slab. ‘The effective breadth of the slab takes this effect into account and is the notional width of slab acting at the compressive strength of the concrete. It is not a precise figure as it depends on the form of loading and position in the span. bent ba ‘ef__> j<—_——"tt___} Mosh Eee ET shear 7 \ owe cH le Ss ot ‘Secondary beam Secondary beam (a) Deck perpendicular to (©) Dock parallel to secondary beam primary Figure 2 Effective breadth of slab used in determining properties of composite section EC4 Clause UK NAD ulFor compatibility between designs at the ultimate and serviceability limit state, the effective breadth is taken as span/8 on each side of the beam (see Figure 2). This results in an effective breadth of span/4 for simply supported internal beams, but not exceeding the actual slab width acting with each beam (as in BS 5950: Part 3). No allowance is made for combined stress effects in the slab and beam. ‘The treatment of continuous beams is similar in Eurocode 4 and BS 5950: Part 3 (but is not considered in this publication). 4.3 Plastic analysis of composite section ‘The moment resistance of a composite section is determined using plastic analysis, principles. It is assumed that the strains across the section are sufficiently high that the steel stresses are at their yield values throughout the section and that the concrete has reached its design compressive strength. Plastic stress blocks are rectangular, unlike elastic stress blocks which are triangular. ‘The plastic moment resistance is independent of the sequence of loading (i.e. propped ‘or unpropped construction). The moment resistance of the section is then compared to the total factored moment applied to the beam. ‘The material strengths to be used are: Concrete: 0,85 fix Ae which may be taken as 0,57 fig 0 0,45 fog Steel: Ng which may be taken as 0,95 f, ‘The compressive resistance of the concrete slab is therefore: Re = OAS fay Deg he where h, is the depth of the concrete slab above the profiled decking bag is the effective breadth of the slab (see Section 4.2) Account may be taken of the concrete contained within the ribs of the profile in cases where the ribs run parallel to the beam (this benefit is usually neglected). ‘The tensile resistance of the steel section is: R= 0,95 fy Ay ‘The moment resistance of the cross-section may be evaluated by equating compression and tension across the section, the concrete being assumed to resist no tension. Three cases are illustrated in Figure 3. The following formulae ate appropriate for symmetric sections. 12 EC4 Clause 4.2.21 4.4.1.2 UK NADC4 Clause Re a Tite Lena. ite tyre tye lab y, In steel y, In stool flange web (a) (b) te) Figure 3. Plastic analysis of composite sections under sagging (positive) moment 4.3.1 Plastic neutral axis in the concrete slab Where R, > R,, it follows that the plastic neutral axis lies in the concrete in order that the compressive force in the slab is reduced to be equivalent to the tensile resistance of the beam. It is not necessary to calculate the plastic neutral axis depth, Yp» explicitly, if the following formula for the moment resistance is used: the +h -& 7 Q Myena *R, Sab trea Ry where ht is the depth of the steel section 1h, is the height of concrete slab above the deck profile, and Ah, is the depth of the profiled decking 4.3.2 Plastic neutral axis in the top flange of the beam Where R. < R,, it follows that the full compressive resistance of the slab is developed, and the plastic neutral axis falls into the steel beam. Normally, it is sufficient to assume that the plastic neutral axis lies within the top flange. This is the case when R, > R,, where R,, is the tensile resistance of the web of the beam. ‘Taking moments around the centre of the top flange gives, conservatively: M, Reap |e as @ fyera “Ry 5 + Ro |= + hy 1B4.3.3 Plastic neutral axis in the web of the beam ‘There are extreme cases of design with very heavy beams or edge beams where the plastic neutral axis lies in the web of the beam, such that R. < R,,.. This leads to: +h Myura = Maptra @) >| Bis 2 where M,ygpq is the moment resistance of the steel section alone. Ry = 0,95 f, ty (i 2t,), and 4,, and f,are the web and flange thickness respectively. ‘The depth of the web in compression should not exceed 38 4, & in order for it to be treated as ‘Class 2'; where © = V(235/f,) 4.4 Shear resistance 4.4.1 Pure shear In Eurocodes 3 and 4, the shear resistance of a web is taken as: 4, Voera 0,58 f, Ay Ma © B te where A, is the shear area of the section ‘The shear strength of steel compares to 0,6 f, in BS 5950: Parts 1 and 3. The definition of A, is the same as in BS 5950: Part 1. 4.4.2 Combined bending and shear Where high shear and moment co-exist at one point in the span (i.e. the beam is subject to point loads), vertical shear can cause a reduction in the moment resistance of the beam. The interaction equation is the same as that used in BS 5950: Part 3, although presented rather differently: Mog SMypq + Mpa ~ Mpa) (I ~ (2 Vou Vppra-U)?) © where Myrg is the moment resistance of the section ignoring the web Msg and Vsq are the applied moment and the shear force respectively at the point considered. This relationship is presented in Figure 4. It follows that if Vsy < 0,5 Vygrar no reduction to the moment resistance is made. 14 EC4 Clause Table 4.2 442 44.2.2 443C4 Clause Mire 0.8 Voie Voi Shear force Figure 4 Interaction curve for moment and shear in composite beam 4.5 Shear connection 4.5.1 Forms of shear connector The modern form of welded shear connection is the headed stud. The most popular size is 19 mm diameter and 100 mm height. Studs are often welded through the decking using a hand tool connected via a control unit to a power generator (see Figure 5). Figure 5 Through-deck welding of shear connector 15‘There are, however, some limitations to through-deck welding: firstly, the top flange of the beam should not be painted or, alternatively, the paint removed from the zone where the shear connectors are to be welded; secondly, the galvanized steel should be less than 1,25 mm thick, be clean and free from moisture. As an alternative construction procedure, the shear connectors can be pre-welded to the beam and either, holes cut in the decking, or single sheet spans used that butt up against the shear connectors. Both these techniques have buildability limitations. ‘The *shot-fired’ shear connector shown in Figure 6 is often used in smaller projects where site power may be a problem. In this case, the shear connectors are attached by powder actuated pins. There are other forms of shear connectors, but most lack practical application. All shear connectors should be capable of resisting uplift forces caused by the tendency of the slab to separate from the beam. Hence headed rather than plain studs are used. 4.5.2 Resistance of stud shear connectors The resistance of headed stud shear connectors is defined by two design equations, the first representing failure of the concrete, and the second corresponding to shear failure of the stud (at its weld collar). ‘The smaller of the two values is used in design. eg = 0.2900 hy EB. /y, o rd 8 w 7 08h ®) Concrete properties fz, and E, are defined in Section 2.3. The, ultimate tensile strength of the steel, j,, used in the studs is normally 450 N/mm? and should not exceed 500 N/mm?, Figure 6 Hilti HVB shot-fired shear connectors attached to steel beam 16 EC4 Clause 6.1.16) 63.2.1@ takes into account the height of the stud and is given by 0,2 (h/d + 1) < 1,0 where: his the overall height of the stud d@ is the diameter of the stud ‘The partial safety factor y, is taken as 1,25 at the ultimate limit state. This is the inverse of the 0,8 factor used to modify the basic resistances of shear connectors in BS 5950: Part 3. ‘These formulae apply for stud diameters not exceeding 22 mm. The design resistances of the common range of stud shear connectors are presented in Table 4. ‘These resistances are up to 10% lower than the equivalent values in BS 5950: Part 3, Table 5. However, in BS 5950: Part 3, no data are presented for concrete cube strengths exceeding 40 N/mm’ because of the potentially less ductile behaviour of the shear connectors. The cut-off in resistance in Equation (8) is an attempt to overcome this problem. Table 4 Design resistances (kN) of stud shear connectors ‘Stud diameter and height || Concrete cube strength (N/mm?) on 25 | 30 | 35 | 240 19mm dia x 100mm_| 63,8 | 73,4 | 81,1 | 83,4 22mm dia x 100mm_| 85,5 | 98,4 | 108,7 | 1118 16 mm dia x 75 mm 45,2 | 52,0 | 57,5 | 59,1 For lightweight concrete, Eurocode 4 assumes that the design resistance in Equation (, varies as 9/2400 due to influence of E... This approach is considerably more conservative than in BS 5950: Part 3 where & Strength reduction of 10% is permitted for concrete densities of 1700 to 2000 kg/m’. The UK NAD recognizes this difference and states that the resistance of shear connectors in lightweight concrete (Of this density range) may be taken as 90% of the resistance of shear connectors for the equivalent grade of normal weight concrete. 4.6 Full and partial shear connection In simply supported composite beams subject to uniform load, the elastic shear flow defining the shear transfer between the slab and the beam is linear, increasing to a ‘maximum at the ends of the beam. Beyond the elastic limit of the shear connectors, there is a transfer of force along the beam such that, at failure, each of the shear connectors is assumed to resist equal force. This implies that the shear connectors possess adequate deformation capacity. In the plastic design of composite beams, the longitudinal shear force to be transferred between the points of zero and maximum moment should be the smaller of R, or R, (see Section 4.3). If so, full shear connection is provided. EC4 Clause 3 UK NAD 612 74.6.1 Degree of shear connection In cases where fewer shear connectors than the number required for full shear connection are provided itis not possible to develop the full plastic moment resistance of the composite section. ‘The degree of shear connection may be defined as: R Ns Mt fore, < R, o % 7% R o No fork, < R (10) yO R where R, is the total shear force transferred by the shear connectors between the points of zero and maximum moment ‘Ny is the number of shear connectors required for full shear connection. NN is the number of shear connectors provided over the relevant part of the span. 4.6.2 Linear interaction method ‘There are two methods of determining the moment resistance of a composite section with partial shear connection. The simplest method is the so-called ‘linear-interaction’ approach in which the moment resistance is defined by: N Mpa = Mopera + % Myera~ Maperd ay where Myer is the moment resistance of the composite section for full shear connection M, ‘apt is the moment resistance of the steel section. For adequate design, Mg < Mpqy Where Mg, is the applied ultimate moment. The ‘check may be repeated at point load positions by redefining N as the number of shear connectors from the support to the point considered. This approach is conservative and may be preferred for ‘hand’ checks. 4.6.3 Stress block method The second approach is ‘exact’ in that the equilibrium of the section is solved by equating the force in the concrete to the force transferred by the shear connectors, R,. No design formulae are given in Eurocode 4, but the formulae in Appendix B of BS 5950: Part 3°) are based on the same principle. ‘The stress block method leads to significantly higher moment resistance than the linear interaction method for degrees of shear connection between 0,4 and 0,7. This is confirmed by recent tests on composite beams with low degrees of shear 18 EC4 Clause 6.2.1.2(2)connection™), The behaviour of a typical composite beam with variable shear connection is illustrated in Figure 7. ‘Rigid’ shear- connectors Interaction ‘method {Lower limit on N/Ny (Ec) 04 10 Degree of shear-connection, N/Ny Figure 7 Interaction between moment resistance and degree of shear connection in composite beams Calibration studies carried out during the preparation of Burocode 4 indicate that the stress block method gives similar results to the method in BS 5950: Part 3 for partial shear connection when the partial safety factor for steel is 1,05 - as in the UK NAD. 4.6.4 Minimum degree of shear connection In using the above methods, a minimum degree of shear connection is specified Eurocode 4, based on research by Johnson and Molenstra®, The minimum limit is introduced in order to ensure adequate deformation capacity of the shear connectors. In principle, the use of the stress block method imposes greater deformations on the shear connectors at failure and, therefore, any general limit is conservative for the linear interaction method. ‘The general limit on the degree of shear connection is defined in Clause 6.1.2 as: LsSm NN, > 04 Ss Ls25m NIN, > 0,25 + 0,03L (12 L>2%m_ NIN, > 10 where Z is the beam span in metres. C4 Clause UK NAD. 6.12 19EC4 Clause A relaxation of the lower limit is permitted when all the following four con« met: + through-deck welding of stud shear connectors of 19 mm diameter is used. + there is one stud per rib. + the rib is of proportions b,/h > 2 and fy < 60 mm ‘+ the Tinear interaction method, described in Section 4.6.2, is used. In this case: L<10m NIN, 2 04 10 s Ls 25m NIN, = 0,04L (3) Le 25m NIN, = 1,0 ‘These limits are compared in Figure 8. Equation (13) is similar to the requirements of BS 5950: Part 3, but gives some improvement for longer spans. It reflects the fact that the linear interaction method is conservative in comparison to the stress block method and, therefore, the shear connectors are not stressed to the same extent. Limit for composite slabs {subject to certain require Span (m) Figure 8 Variation of minimum degre of a composite beam of shear connection with the span 4.6.5 Spacing of shear connectors Other limits may influence the maximum or minimum degree of shear connection that 6.13 may be used in practice. ‘The minimum spacing of the shear connectors Sd longitudinally and 4d laterally. 6.4.20) ‘The maximum spacing is the smaller of: 6 X slab depth or 800 mm. 6.4.1.5) Limits are also placed on the edge distance and the minimum flange thickness for —_6.4.1.6(2) adequate welding 20C4 Clause 4.6.6 Other checks Partial shear connection is not permitted for beams subject to heavy non-symmetric point loads due to columns etc. A further requirement is that the moment resistance ‘of beams subject to point loads should be adequate at all locations along the beam. It may be necessary to check the shear connection provided at intermediate points or, alternatively, distribute the total number of shear connectors in proportion to the shear force distribution along the beam. 4.7 Influence of deck shape 6.3.3 The efficiency of the shear connection between the composite slab and the composite ‘beam may be reduced as a result of the shape of the deck. This is analogous to the behaviour of haunched slabs where the strength of the shear connectors is highly dependent on the area of concrete around them. The behaviour is illustrated in Figure 9. 6.3.3.2 Centro resistanc Stud force distribution Waid rushing (a) Shar connector in plain slab Moment on head Crushing oractirg Centr (b) sh iF connector fixed through profiled st ating Figure 9 Shear connector forces in solid and composite slabs According to Eurocode 4, the strength reduction factor, k,, for shear connectors (relative to a solid slab) is determined from: 0,7 By thy) wh 1 (14) w 2EC4 Clause where b, is the average trough width (or minimum width for re-entrant profiles) Ar is the stud height N,, is the number of studs per trough (N, < 3). This formula applies to the strength of the shear connectors when the steel decking crosses the beams and where the shear connectors project at least 35 mm above the top of the decking. A further limit is that h < fy + 75 mm in evaluating k,, ‘The coefficient of 0,7 has been established on the basis of recent test evidence. It is a reduction from the coefficient of 0,85 used in previous guidance. It is also recognised that the formula may be unconservative for shear connectors in pairs and therefore the upper limit on k, is 0,8 (as it is in BS 5950: Part 3). ‘Where the decking is placed parallel to the beams, the constant in the above equation 6.3.3.1 is reduced from 0,7 to 0,6. However, no further reduction is made for the number of shear connectors in this case and the limit on k, is 1,0 for N, = 1 or 2. ‘Many modern deck profiles have a central stiffening fold in the trough which requires the shear connector to be welded off-centre. ‘The preferred position of attachment is where the shear connectors are located on the side of the trough closest to the end of the nearest support (see Figure 10). This requires a change in orientation at mid-span. If this arrangement cannot be assured on site, then a conservative view of the strength reduction factor is to be taken. Crushing \ Compression in slab End of beam Force applied to slab Non-beneficial side Beneficial side Figure 10 Influence of off-centre shear connector forces No guidance is given in Eurocode 4 but BS 5950: Part 3 may be used in this case. The important dimension is ¢, the distance from the centre of the shear connector to the mid-height of the adjacent deck (see Figure 10). In using the above equation b, should be taken as 2e where the shear connectors are welded in the non-beneficial location. This only applies to cases where the deck crosses the beams, as illustrated ‘Alternatively, manufacturers’ test information, as obtained from standard ‘push out" 10.2.2 tests may be used. This should be divided by the appropriate safety factor. 22EC4 Clause 4.8 Transverse reinforcement 6.6.2 ‘The longitudinal shear strength of the concrete slab should be checked in order to ensure transfer of force from the shear connectors into the slab without splitting the concrete, This may require provision of transverse reinforcement (perpendicular to the beam), Potential shear planes through the slab lie on either side of the shear connectors (Figure 11). Reinforcement oa \ (a) Deck to beam to beam erpendicular (b) Deck par Figure 11 Potential failure planes through composite slab in longitudinal shear ‘The shear resistance per unit length of shear plane along the beam is: Yea = 25 Ay teat Agfa Ys $02 bey Mey Ye asy where A,, the cross-sectional area of concrete per unit length in any shear plane ‘gq is the basic shear strength of concrete, presented in Table 5 A, is the amount of the reinforcement crossing each shear plane Jog is the yield strength of the reinforcement ‘nis taken as 1,0 for normal weight concrete and 0,3 + 0,7 (p/2400) for lightweight concrete, where p is the concrete density (kg/m). Table 5 Table of tp, a8 a function of f., Strength class} C20/25 | €2/30 | C30/37 | c35/45 | c40/50 | c45/55 | c50/60| of concrete fog 25 30 37 45 50 55 60 The 025 | 030 | 033 | 037 | 042 | 045 | 048 23To this longitudinal shear resistance may be added a component arising from the tensile strength of the deck. Its full strength can be used when the deck crosses the beams (i.e. secondary beams), and is continuous. There are situations, however, ‘where the deck is discontinuous. In such cases, the anchorage force developed by the shear connectors may be included, provided both ends of the deck are properly attached (see Figure 12). The anchorage force per unit length of the beam is given both in BS 5950: Part 3 and EC4, as: N, Yad = SM Sb) Ne a6) where N, is the number of shear connectors in each group on the beam flange d’ is the stud diameter 1, is the sheet thickness ry is the design strength of the sheet steel used to form the profiled decking 3” is the shear connector spacing. - Butt joint in decking a VEN bd vinsee | In slat ek he a OK = Force applied it Anchorage’ ie by shear force in. (12,20) connectore a decking i “ied ELEVATION Figure 12 /ilustration of action of decking as transverse reinforcement ‘The coefficient of 4 should be replaced by (1 + a/(1,1d)) where a is the distance of the edge of the sheet from the centre of the stud. Recent test information indicates that this approach is very conservative and full end anchorage is achieved when the ‘edge distance, a, exceeds 2d. In practice, the edge distance should exceed 40 mm. For an internal beam, the total longitudinal shear resistance per unit length of the beam is determined by shear failure along two shear planes and is therefore 2(Upy + Ypg)-- This resistance should exceed the equivalent shear force transferred by the shear connectors at the ultimate limit state. “The contribution of the decking should be neglected where itis not properly anchored (ie. at discontinuities or at edge beams), or where longitudinal sheet overlaps are close to the beam. This is generally the case in primary beams subject to point loads where the deck is placed parallel to the beams. In such cases additional transverse reinforcement is required in the slab in the high shear zone. It is usually found that mesh reinforcement provides adequate transverse reinforcement in the design of secondary beams. 24 EC4 Clause 6.6.3 6.6.32) 7.6.1.43) 7.6.1.43)5. SERVICEABILITY LIMIT STATES 5.1 General criteria The serviceability requirements for composite beams concern the control of deflections, cracking of concrete and, in some cases, vibration response. Deflections are important in order to prevent cracking or deformation of the partitions and cladding, or to avoid noticeable deviations of floors or ceilings. Floor vibrations may be important in long span applications, but these calculations are outside the scope of the Code (see Section 5.4), Most designers base assessments at the serviceability limit state on elastic behaviour (with certain modifications for creep and cracking etc.). To avoid consideration of post-elastic effects, limits are usually placed on the stresses existing in beams at the serviceability limit state. However, no stress limits are given in Eurocode 4, because it is argued that: + slight yielding in the positive moment region has a limited effect on deflections; + the beneficial effects of continuity on deflection are ignored. Deflection limits are not specified in Eurocode 4 and reference is made to Eurocode 3 for limits on deflections due to permanent and variable loads (see Table 6). Many designers feel that ‘total’ deflections are less important than imposed load deflections, for example, where a raised floor or suspended ceiling is used. It is justified to relax the limit on total deflection to span/200 in such cases, or to consider precambering or propping of long span beams. 5.2 Calculation of deflections 5.2.1 Second moment of area Deflections are calculated using the second moment of area of the composite section based on elastic properties (See Figure 13). Under positive moment the concrete may bbe assumed to be uncracked, and the second moment of area of the composite section (expressed as a transformed stee! section) is: Ag (te *2hy +h)? yy he I. +1, a7 4(+nn Be ® where: nis the ratio of the elastic moduli of steel to concrete (see Section 5.2.2) taking into account the creep of the concrete ris the ratio of the cross-sectional area of the steel section relative to the concrete section Ty _ is the second moment of area of the steel section Note: other terms as defined previously EC4 Clause 2.34 5.10) EC3 Table 4.1Table 6 Recommended limiting values for vertical deflections in Eurocode 3 Deflections lbmex = Sagging in the final state relative to the straight line joining the supports. Bo ir 5, = pre-camber hogging) of the ax beam in the unloaded state es (state 0) it s, = duetoc {variation of the deflection of the beam due to the permanent loads) {state 1) lb, = duetoa (variation of the deflection of the beam due to the variable loading) (state 2) [conditions| Limits Ba | 8 roofs generally maintenance floors generally partitions 200" | 1/250 roofs frequently carrying personnel other than for 250 | L/300 250* | 1/300 {floors and roofs supporting brittle finish or non-fiexible | 1/250 | 1/350 floors supporting columns (unless the deflection has been | 1/400 | 1/350 included in the global analysis for the ultimate state) * where 8,9, can impai the appearance of the building | 1/250 - + may be reduced to L/200 if a raised floor or suspended ceiling is used. For cantilever: = twice cantilever span 26 EC4 Clause EC3 Table 4.1\Equivatent Elastic steel area h neutral axis Elastic stress distribution Transformed section Figure 13 Elastic behaviour of composite beam The ratio 1,/1 in Equation (7) therefore defines the improvement in the stiffness of the composite section relative to the steel section. Typically, /_/Iis in the range of 2,5 to 4,0, indicating that one of the main benefits of composite action is in terms of reduction of deflections 5.2.2 Modular ratio The values of elastic modulus of concrete under short term toads are given in Table 3.2 of EC4. The elastic modulus under long term loads is affected by creep, which causes a reduction in the stiffness of the concrete, The modular ratio, n, is the ratio of the elastic modulus of steel to the time-dependent modulus of concrete. Typically modular ratios that may be used for normal weight concrete are 6,5 for short term (variable) loading, and 20 for tong term (permanent) loading in an internal environment. For buildings of normal usage, surveys have shown that the proportions of variable and permanent imposed loads usually exceed 3:1. Although separate deflection calculations may be needed for the variable and permanent deflections, a representative modular ratio of 10 is usually appropriate for imposed load deflection calculations. 5.2.3 Influence of partial shear connection Deflections increase due to the effects of slip in the shear connectors. These effects are ignored in composite beams designed for full shear connection. For cases of partial shear connection using headed stud shear connectors, the deflection, 5, is increased according to: 5 cr se{r —§] (Be -1 8) 8. N) Be C4 Clause 3.1.42 5.2.26) aNIN, is the degree of shear connection at the ultimate limit state 8, is the deflection of the composite beam with full shear connection is the deflection of the steel beam under the same loads C _is a coefficient, taken as 0,3 for unpropped construction and 0,5 for propped construction. The difference between these coefficients arises from the higher force in the shear connectors at serviceability in propped construction. An additional benefit of using Eurocode 4 is that no account of slip is taken in ‘unpropped beams when NIN, > 0,5 (i.e, 8 = 8, in the above equation). BS 5950 Part 3 does not make the relaxation. In EC4 it is argued that deflection calculations are already conservative. 5.2.4 Shrinkage induced deflections EC4 is ambiguous about deflections arising from shrinkage of the concrete slab. It states that shrinkage deflections need only be calculated for simply supported beams when the span to depth ratio of the beam exceeds 20, and when the free shrinkage strain of the concrete exceeds 400 x 10”°. In practice, these deflections will only be significant for spans greater than 12 m in exceptionally warm dry atmospheres. ‘The curvature, K,, due to a free shrinkage strain, ¢,, is: 8, (he +2hy +h) A 20 +nn I, ‘nis the modular ratio appropriate for shrinkage calculations (n = 20). The deflection due to this curvature is: 8, = 0,125 K, L? This deflection formula ignores continuity effects at the supports and probably over-estimates shrinkage deflections by a considerable margin. 5.3 Stress checks No specific guidance on serviceability stress limits is given in Eurocode 4 and it may be concluded that stress checks are not required at the serviceability limit state if Proper account is taken of the imposed and total load deflection limits. This represents a considerable reduction in design effort relative to BS 5950: Part 3. However, there may be cases where serviceability stress checks are prudent in order to avoid inelastic deflections. Examples might be for beams supporting heavy cladding or columns. 28 C4 Clause 5.2.2(5) 5.2.09)5.4 Vibration check This section is included because a check on the potential vibration response may be necessary for long span beams designed for light imposed loads. A simple measure of the natural frequency of a beam is: f cycles/sec where 8,,, is the instantaneous deflection ( in mm) caused by re-application of the self weight of the floor and other permanent loads on to the composite beam. A minimum limit on f is proposed as 4 cycles/sec for most building applications except where there is vibrating machinery, or 3 cycles/sec for car parks. The limit may be raised to 5 cycles/sec for special buildings such as sports halls. 5.5 Span to depth ratio Adequate serviceability performance may be generally assumed when the composite ‘beams are less than a certain span to depth ratio. This precise limit depends on the form of loading and steel grade. The following limits may be used for choosing composite beam sizes at the Scheme Design stage: Uniform loading: Span to depth ratio = 18 to 20 ‘Two point loading: Span to depth ratio = 15 to 18 where the ‘depth’ is the combined slab and beam depth. Spans longer than these limits will generally be controlled by serviceability criteria, as covered in this section. 5.6 Crack control It is only necessary to control cracking of concrete in cases where the proper functioning of the structure or its appearance would be impaired. Internally within buildings, durability is not affected by cracking. Similarly when raised floors are used, cracking is not visually important. Where it is necessary to control cracking, the amount of reinforcement should exceed a minimum value in order to distribute cracks uniformly in the negative moment region. This minimum percentage, p, is given by: xc100% 8, k, is a coefficient due to the bending stress distribution in the section with a value between 0,4 and 0,9. k is a coefficient accounting for the decrease in tension strength (k ~ 0,8). EC4 Clause 33.2 5.3.22) 29fe the effective tensile strength of concrete. A value of 3 N/mm? is the minimum adopted. s, is the maximum permitted stress in the reinforcement. A typical value of p is 0,4% to 0,6% which is well in excess of the minimum of 0,2% necessary for shrinkage control and transverse load distribution. However, these bars need only be placed in the negative moment region of the beams or slabs. ‘This reinforcement may also act as fire reinforcement or transverse reinforcement. Steel decking plays an important role in preventing shrinkage cracking and, therefore, additional reinforcement is not necessary where this is the only concern. Although beneficial, the effect of the steel decking is neglected when the slab is subject to negative moment and cracking may occur at the supports. In such cases, additional reinforcement is required, ‘An additional criterion is that the bars should be of small diameter and should be spaced relatively close together in order to be more effective in crack control. Maximum bar spacings for a given steel stress are given in Table 7. Otherwise checks on crack widths are made as in EC2. Table 7 Maximum bar spacing for high bond bars Steel stress o, (Nimm?) | <160 | 200 | 240 | 280 | 320 | 360 | 400 Maximum | ,=0,3mm | 250 | 200] 160] 110] use Table 5.1 bar spacing in EC4 (mm) W,=0,5mm | 250 | 250 | 250 | 250} 200} 140] 80 where w, = design crack width 30 EC4 Clause Table 3.1 5.3.15) Table 5.1 Table 5.26. FIRE RESISTANCE ‘The fire resistance of composite beams may be established in a manner similar to that for steel beams. ‘The important parameters in determining the required thickness of fire protection are the limiting temperature of the section and the fire resistance period. Design values are presented in BS 5950: Part 8°) as a function of the load ratio of the beam at the fire limit state. ‘This is defined as: Applied moment at fire limit state Load ratio = _____Applie’ moment at fire Timit state ____ Moment resistance of composite beam at room temperature The moment resistance at room temperature may be established by setting partial factors on materials to unity (see Table 1). For most beams designed to their maximum resistance under normal conditions, the load ratio is typically 0,6. ‘The limiting temperature of the composite section at this load ratio is 620°C. Most fire protection materials available in the UK are assessed on a single limiting temperature of 550°C which is therefore conservative. Hence, the data presented in the ASFPCM/SC/FTSG publication Fire protection for structural steel in buildings may be used for composite beams. Recent research in the UK” has shown that in composite beams with steel decking, it is possible to omit the void fillers above the top flange of the steel beam in cases of up to 60 minutes fire resistance. ‘This is particularly economic where board type fire protection is used in composite beams with trapezoidal deck profiles. Detailed guidance on calculation methods for the fire resistance of composite slabs and beams will be presented in the forthcoming Eurocode 4: Part 1.2%), 317. 7.1 COMMENTARY ON DESIGN TABLES FOR COMPOSITE BEAMS General information ‘The selection of the size of steel beam to be used as a composite beam depends upon a number of variables: span, loading, beam spacing, slab depth, concrete characteristics, steel grade, deck profile shape, etc. Some of these variables have been fixed for the purposes of preparing the Design Tables: ‘The steel beams considered are Universal Beam (UB) and Universal Column (UC) sections In addition, continental beams (IPE) and column (HE) sections are also considered for typical cases that may be used in the wider European context. ‘The common span of composite slabs is 3,0 m, which determines the spacing of the secondary beams. ‘The practical range of the spans is 2,5 m to 4 m with different deck heights ‘The depth of the composite slab is determined by the fire resistance requirements. For a 90 minute fire resistance, the typical depths are 120 mm to 140 mm, These depths are obtained from Reference 20. ‘The conerete grade is typically grade 30 (concrete cube strength 30 N/mm?) ‘The steel grade is usually grade $ 355 (characteristic yield strength 355 N/mm’). Welded shear connectors are 19 mm diameter and 95 to 120 mm as-welded length. ‘The number of shear connectors fixed to secondary beams is a function of the spacing of the deck troughs. Shear connectors are normally welded in every ot alternate troughs (or in pairs for wide-trough profiles). ‘The span of primary beams is a function of the number of secondary beams and the spacing of the secondaries. The main variable is then the maximum span of the secondary beams in the grillage, which determines the magnitude of the point loads on the primary beams. ‘The steel beams are unpropped during construction, ‘The tables refer to four ‘generic’ profiles as shown in Figure 14. ‘These profiles are typical of the broad range of modern steel decks that are marketed. The generic profiles are used in order to reduce the number of Design Tables presented in Section 8. ‘Their spanning capabilities are also indicated in Figure 14. 32(SL_T. 180 Re-ontrant be3m tS VS \ 9 >| tectum netont boom b=3,6m }— Deep b-am Figure 14 Deck profiles used in the Design Tables for composite beams ‘Two main design cases are considered: uniformly loaded beams (i.e. secondary beams loaded directly by the composite slab) and point-loaded beams (i.e. primary beams loaded by secondary beams), For uniformly loaded beams, the decking is taken as being laid perpendicular to the beams, so that shear connectors can only be fixed in locations determined by the spacing of the troughs of the deck profile. For point-loaded beams, the decking is laid parallel to the beams, so that the spacing of the shear connectors is independent of the deck profile shape. ‘The Design Tables for the uniform load cases are presented in terms of permissible spans of beams for the specified imposed load and selected beam size. Linear interpolation between different imposed loads is permitted. The design follows the approach of Section 4, and the failure criterion corresponding to the maximum beam span is also shown (see Section 7.2). Spans are given for the cases with shear connectors in every trough, alternate troughs or in pairs per trough; the difference being the degree of shear connection provided. Also given is the imposed load deflection and that of the unpropped beam in the construction stage. ‘The Design Tables for the point load cases are presented for single and double (equally spaced) point Toads. Because the spacing of these point loads is equal to the slab span, it follows that the beam span is a multiple of the slab span (i.e. 2 times the slab span for the single point load case and 3 times the slab span for the double point load case). Output is now in terms of the length of the secondary beams in the grillage (i.e. the spacing of the primary beams). Because of the greater number of variables in these Tables, the results are expressed in terms of the maximum span of the secondary beams, and also the number of shear connectors required for the appropriate degree of shear connection. Again, the failure criterion is also given for each case (see Section 7.2) 33Designs are carried out using normal weight (NWC) and lightweight (LWC) concrete. Slab depths in LWC are approximately 10 mm less than in NWC for the same fire resistance period. In general, the size of composite beams designed with LWC slabs will be comparable to those designed with NWC slabs because the reduction in their composite strength is pattly offset by the reduced weight of the slab. The design of NWC slabs with S 275 grade steel beams was considered to be relatively unusual and is not included for most of the tables. The tables are standardised on grade 30 concrete, as higher grades demonstrate little benefit in cases where spans are controlled by serviceability. Because of the potentially large number of Design Tables, the different cases considered in this publication have been rationalized. The uniform load cases are more sensitive to the particular deck profile used, since the degree of shear connection is a function of the trough spacing. This is not the case for the point load cases, because the number of shear connectors can easily be varied. Therefore, the Design Tables have been reduced to the two cases of the ‘re-entrant’ and the ‘medium height’ trapezoidal profile when considering point loads. ‘The design of edge beams is considered only for the above profiles as these designs can be applied also to other profiles at the Scheme Design stage. For edge beams, the effective width of the slab and its loading are half of those of the equivalent internal beams. However, an additional cladding load of 10 KN/m is included. In order to minimize any potential deformation of the cladding, this load is considered as an imposed load when calculating deflections and a relatively severe imposed load deflection limit of span/500 is used in this case. ‘The effect of varying the beam spacing is considered for the medium height ‘generic’ profile only. ‘The cases considered are 3,0 m and 3,6 m spacing. A method of taking into account different beam spacings is given in Section 7.4. The use of Hilti shear connectors is considered only for re-entrant profiles where, for geometric reasons, this connector can be readily installed. In general, increasing the slab depth increases the beam spans that may be used. This is because the ‘moment resistance and the elastic section properties of the beams increase more rapidly than the increase in self weight. However, the degree of shear connection is influenced by the slab depth for heavier beams (as R, < R, in Section 4.6). Increasing the slab depth can in some cases cause no span to be output in the tables. This is because the minimum degree of shear connection can no longer be achieved for a given spacing of shear connectors. For small increases in slab depth (up to 15 mm) above those tabulated, the adverse effect on the degree of shear connection may be neglected. Consequently, designs using thicker slabs can be used safely based on data for thinner slabs. It should be noted that the design of uniformly loaded beams is generally controlled by serviceability criteria (g to i, see Section 7.2 for the definitions of the criteria). This means that the moment resistance of the beam is satisfactory, except for beams with low degrees of shear connection. For beams subject to point loads, strength or serviceability criteria may control the design. 7.2 Introduction to uniform load cases Design Tables 1 to 28 in Section 8 present the maximum spans of uniformly loaded composite beams as a function of the imposed loading on the floor and the beam size. ‘The results are tabulated for shear connectors in every trough and, if appropriate, for shear connectors in alternate troughs, or for two shear connectors pet trough (in pairs). ‘The user selects the beam size for a given slab configuration, which just satisfies the design. criteria of load and span. Linear interpolation between the load cases is permitted. Beam sizes can be compared for two spacings of shear connectors in order to appraise the overall economy of the structural design. 34The following additional points should be noted: Loads: ‘The design imposed loads should include 1 kN/m? for partitions (according to BS 6399 Part 1), They are presented as unfactored loads of 3,5, 4,5, 6 or 7,5 kN/m? which correspond to typically specified imposed loads in BS 6399. The tables include an allowance of 0,5 kN/m? for ceiling and services. ‘The self weight of the slab is calculated from a density of 2350 kg/m? for normal weight (NWC) concrete and 1850 kg/m? for lightweight (LWC) concrete. The deck weight is taken as 0,12 kN/m?. The self weight of the steel beam is also included. ‘Shear connectors: These are either: Welded: 19 mm diameter stud shear connectors of 95 mm as-welded height (100 mm ‘nominal height) or 120 mm for the deep deck, or Hilti shot-fired shear connectors of 110 mm height (HVB 110). ‘Symbols: LE maximum span (m) for shear connectors placed in every trough LA. maximum span (m) for shear connectors placed in alternate troughs LP maximum span (m) for shear connectors placed in pairs per trough (if appropriate) DE imposed load deflection (mm) for shear connectors placed in every trough (for span LE) DA imposed load deflection (mm) for shear connectors placed in alternate troughs (for span LA) DP imposed load defi (for span LP) (mm) for shear connectors placed in pairs per trough DS deflection (mm) of the beam due to self weight of the floor and the beam in unpropped ‘construction (for span of LE or LP, whichever is the greater) Failure criteria (as noted in the tables) are: ‘moment resistance of the beam exceeded in the construction stage b shear force in composite beam exceeds 0,5 Vzpgy and the design continues by calculating the reduced moment resistance of the section © moment resistance of composite beam with full shear connection exceeded d moment resistance of composite beam with partial shear connection exceeded € limit on degree of partial shear connection not s. ied (see Section 4.6) 35f serviceability stress in steel, ie. f, is exceeded (not included in EC4, but considered here only for edge beams) g total deflection limit exceeded. This limit is taken as span/200. ‘imposed load deflection limit exceeded. This limit is taken as span/350 for internal beams and span/500 for edge beams supporting cladding. The cladding load, if supported by the edge beam, is included in this check i natural frequency < 4 Hz Long spans: ‘As the spans increase, the beam sizes are often controlled by failure criterion e or i. Criterion € occurs because the minimum degree of shear connection (Section 4.6) increases more rapidly with span than the shear connection provided. In such cases it is appropriate to reduce the spacing of the shear connectors. Criterion i is strongly dependent on the relative proportions of dead and imposed load. The method in Reference 25 may be used to justify the use of longer spans. ‘Transverse reinforcement: ‘A check has been made on the need for additional transverse reinforcement. It is assumed that A142 mesh is provided in all cases. If the deck is continuous over the beams, no additional reinforcement is necessary. If the deck is discontinuous, additional reinforcement may be required (see Section 4.8). Positioning of shear connectors: It is assumed that where there is a central stiffener in the trough of the deck, the shear connectors are welded as suggested in alternate positions in the adjacent troughs. If not, the strengths of the shear connectors may be less than those used to compute the Design Tables. ‘The strength reduction factors (k, in Section 4.7) as used in the Design Tables are presented in Table 8. Table 8 Reduction factors on shear connector strength due to deck shape as used in the Design Tables Welded studs iti (eerie tay] Stud | Single [Pats of] Parallel” oe feel height | studs | studs i) Strength reduction factor, ky Re-entrant | 95 | 10 | 08 | 1.0 1,0 shallow | 95 | 10 | 08 | 1.0 1,0 Medium height| 95 | 0.9 | o@ | 1.0 1.0 Deep 120 | o9 | o7 | 10 NA * decking parallel to beam. 367.3 Introduction to point load cases Design Tables 29 to 64 in Section 8 present the beam sizes that may be used for primary beams ‘subject to point loads. In this case, the span of the primary beam and the imposed load on the floor are defined and the tabulated data are expressed in terms of the maximum span of the secondary beams in the grillage. This effectively defines the magnitude of each point load. Two cases are considered: + Single-point load: Secondary beams connected to the mid-span of the primary beam. ‘The spacing of the secondary beams is 3, 3,5 or 4 m, and therefore the primary beam spans are 6, 7 or 8 m respectively. + Double-point loads: Secondary beams connected to the third-span points of the primary beam. The spacing of the secondary beams is 2,5, 3 or 3,5 m, and therefore the primary beam spans are 7,5, 9 or 10,5 m respectively. The user identifies the load case and the length of primary beam under consideration. The user then selects the beam size corresponding to the span of the secondary beams (i.e. spacing of the primary beams). Linear interpolation between the load cases is permitted The following additional points should be noted: . Loads: The design imposed loads should include 1 KN/m? for partitions (according t0 BS 6398: Part 1), They are presented as unfactored loads of 3,5, 4,5, 6, or 7,5 kN/m” ‘The Design Tables include an allowance of 0,5 kN/m? for ceiling and services, The self weight of the slab is calculated from a density of 2350 kg/m’ for normal weight (NWC) concrete and 1850 kg/m’ for lightweight (LWC) concrete. The deck weight is taken as 0,12 kN/m*. The weight of the primary beam, and an allowance of 0,3 KN/m? for the weight of the secondary beams are also included. + Shear connectors: These are either: Welded: 19 mm diameter stud shear connectors of 95 mm as-welded height (100 mm ‘nominal height) or 120 mm for the deep deck, or Hilti: shot-fired shear connectors of 110 mm height (HVB 110). * Symbols: L_ maximum span (m) of the secondary beam (or average spans of the secondary beams to the left and right of the primary beam meeting at one point on the beam). N’ number of shear connectors required in beam span subject to the minimum spacing noted in Section 4.6.5. These should be distributed uniformly in the zone of high shear. Additional shear connectors are requited in the mid-span zone of the beams with two point loads. . Failure criteria: As for uniform load case (see Section 7.2). 37. Transverse reinforcement It is assumed that the deck may be discontinuous or that sheet-sheet overlaps may be present adjacent to the beams. Transverse reinforcement (in addition to A142 mesh) will be required in most beams subject to point loads. This should be calculated from the guidance in Section 48. 7.4 Use of the tables for typical design cases The following examples illustrate how the designer easily selects the size of steel section to be used in the Scheme Design of a composite beam and floor system. The Design Tables only deal directly with those cases appropriate to the tabulated design data. Interpolation between the tabulated spans for different imposed loads is straightforward but judgement is required when dealing with different beam spacings, slab depths, etc. Consider an internal bay of a composite beam and slab grillage with a column grid of 9 m X 6,5 m, and with a specified imposed load (unfactored) of 3,5 kN/m’. The applied jmposed load should also include 1 kN/m? for partitions (as in BS 6399) giving a total of 4,5 kN/m” For efficient design, the secondary beams span 9 m and the primary beams 6,5 m. Alternate secondary beams are connected to the mid-span point of each primary beam. Therefore, the composite slab is designed to span 3,25 m between the secondary beams. The slab is required to have 1% hours fire resistance and is constructed of lightweight concrete. For ‘Scheme Design purposes, a 60 mm deep deck profile is selected which is intended to be unpropped during construction (as a deeper profile may be more efficient for spans exceeding 3,2 m). The generic deck profile to be used is the medium height profile of Figure 14. The minimum slab depth for this period of fire resistance is 130 mm (see Reference 19), Design is to be carried out for grade $355 steel and welded (19 mm dia. x 95 mm long) shear connectors. 7.4.1 Secondary beams The relevant cases for sizing of the secondary beams subject to uniform load are Tables 10 and 14 corresponding to beam spacings of 3 m and 3,6 m respectively. It is possible to interpolate linearly between the tabulated spans for these beam spacings, using an imposed load of 4,5 KN/m’. Beams that satisfy the design criteria are: two shear connectors per trough (LP > 9 m) 305 x 165 x $4 kgm UB} } = total deflection timit (criterion g) exceeded 356 x 171 x 45 kgim UB} shear connectors in every trough (LE > 9 m) 406 x 140 x 39 kg/m UB} = moment resistance with partial shear connection (criterion d) ‘The Universal Beam 305 x 165 x 54 kg/m (grade S 355) with two shear connectors in every trough. is selected as the shallowest. The imposed load deflection (DP) is 17 mm (span/530) for this case, and the self-weight deflection (DS) of the steel beam is approximately 27 mm. 38An alternative method of designing for a wider beam spacing b than that tabulated is to distribute the excess load on width (b - 3) m as an equivalent uniform load. ‘The additional unfactored imposed load for equivalent beams at 3 m spacing i w= w, 225-9 =o em? 3x 16 where w, is the total factored loading on the slab. In the above case, the modified imposed load is 4,5 + 0,6 = 5,1 KN/m?. This imposed load may bbe now used in Table 10 alone (for b = 3 m). ‘This approach is unconservative for closer beam spacings because the moment resistance of the beam. is affected by the slab breadth for beams longer than 4 times the beam spacing. 7.4.2 Primary beams ‘The relevant case for sizing of a primary beam subject to a central point load is Table 41. ‘The beam span is 6,5 m. Linear interpolation between the cases of 6 m and 7 m span is conservative The required spacing of Primary beams (L > 9 m) for an imposed load of 4,5 KN/m? is achieved for the following beam sizes: 305 x 165 x 54kgim UB} 356 x 171 x 45 kg/m UB} moment resistance with full shear connection (criterion ¢) 406 x 140 x 46 kg/m UB} The Universal Beam 305 x 165 x 54 kg/m (grade S 355) is selected as being of the same depth as the secondary beams. The required number of shear connectors is 50 (i.e. at 130 mm spacing). It is usually necessary to provide additional transverse reinforcement (see Section 4.8). Imposed load deflections are not presented as they do not generally influence the design of beams subject to point loads. Typically, these deflections will be less than span/400. 7.4.3 Design example for composite beam ‘The Design Tables are intended to be used for Scheme Design purposes. For Final Design it is normally necessary to provide more detailed calculations, knowing that the selected beam will satisfy the design criteria, A fully worked design example is presented in Appendix A for a typical 10 m span composite beam subject to uniform load. For this case, the section size is first obtained from Design Table 8. Also included is a check on the need for transverse reinforcement. 7.5 Comparison of designs to different codes ‘Modern codes for composite construction are based on the same general principles of design, but the global safety factor is separated among the loads and materials that are used. Serviceability limits are introduced in some Codes but not in others. Table 9 summarises the main design parameters used in four major Codes, ‘Comparison of these parameters is only meaningful in terms of their effect on practical designs. The Joad-span tables in Section 8 are expressed in terms of the maximum span that can be achieved for a given load. Comparison may be made between the maximum span of the same beam designed to Eurocode 4 or BS 5950: Part 3. The results are expressed in Figure 15 for the medium height generic deck type with normal or lightweight concrete. 39In general, the introduction of the total deflection limit (criterion g in the Design Tables) leads to a reduction in maximum span telative to the previously published Design Tables” in accordance with BS 5950: Part 3. The differences are greater for normal weight than for lightweight concrete due to the influence of self weight deflections. For deeper beams using lightweight concrete, the difference in maximum spans are less than 5%. This severe deflection limit avoids the need for a serviceability stress check which often controls designs to BS 5950: Part 3. Beams designed for low partial shear connection (i.e. single shear connectors per trough) achieve similar spans according to the two Codes.1/64 0081 = Aysuap) a19:0U09 1y61eM2461] 404 anyen UB}s8q_ (9) “e10:0N09 1yBjem jewoU (eqno) O€ eperH UI (YBIY WW COL) PMS JeoWEIP WW EL 40} enjeA UBIsep |eoIdAL (Q) peo| peeq = 9 — ‘pe0| pasodw = O (0) S5ION {epeueo) uON, 460 se 88 ™sv'0 | “eo vlueds DSz'L + OS'L asia eoueysises justo x $8'0 = 1ueWoW UuBiseq i (vsn) SUN eUoN 88 sot 1 89'0 4 vlueds 9@'| + 09'L| (ase) OsIV) A (avn) xn ‘euON ‘2uON 99 ee "4 Sv'0 4 96'0 yiueds 998’! + 0G'L| » epososny| swiesq Arewud q8’o} cued "3 9'0 ze og 4 b'0 > ang p/ueds Dv'l + D9't| | :0S69 Sa syesouog | j9e1g (9M1 | @OMN | ereoueg | eas uipeaig 101984 pomen, (N») eoueisisay uBiseq syoolg ssang ennoay3 peoy J9p03 SULUIT Aupqeaomeg Jor99uU0D 1224S, sureaq a1/soduioa Jo subysep apoo jo Keung & e191 4112 — Se Ss * 5 Q | 3 2 3 5 4,0 | é 8 S 1OP 3 & ~EPEPE 3 a ge 8 * 8 * $ Se 8 = g 8 8 ei] 5 oO 08} a | < o a a 08 | oa fF | LWC 8355 steel + NWG S355 steel © 02 | | ° L 1 L 1 1 L ° 100 200» 300 400S 00-00. 700 Depth of beam (mm) Slab depth = 130/140 mm Concrete grade = C25/30 Shear connectors in pairs at 300 mm spacing Imposed load = 6 kN/m? Figure 15 Comparison of maximum spans obtained from Eurocode 4 and BS 5950: Part 3 428. DESIGN TABLES This section contains Design Tables for both uniform and point load cases which may be used in the ‘Scheme Design of composite beams. For ease of use, a list of these Design Tables including their design parameters is given below: List of Tables for generic profiles - Uniform load case Table] Deck profile | Fire | Slab | Steel | Concrete} Sieb | Shear | Steel No resistance| span | grade | type | depth | connectors |sections thes) | tm) (mm) 1 | Re-entrant 1% 3 |s355| wwe | 120 wf usyuc 2 s355| nwc | 130 w . 3 $275] twe | 120 w : 4 s275| nwc | 130 w 2 5 s355| nwc | 130 w | IPEVHE 6 s 235 | _nwe_| 130 w. : 7 | Shallow height} 1% 3 | s355| two | 126 w | usjuc 8 s355| nwc | 135 w : 9 [ s275 | _uwe_| 125 w u 10 | Medium height] 1% 3 |s356| two | 130 w uBjuc " s355 | nwc | 140 w a 12 $275] two | 130 w c 13 $365 | nwc | 140 w IPE/HE 14 |Medium height] 1% | 3,6 | $365] Lwe | 130 w Buc 15 s355 | nwc | 140 w a 16 $275 | two | 130 w : i sa55 | nwe | 140 w IPEHE 18 Deep 1% 4 |s355| two | 140 w | uBruc 19 s355| nwc | 150 w s 20 s275 | wwe | 140 w : 21 | Medium height} 1% 3€ | $355} Lwce | 130 w Buc 22 s355| nwc | 140 w s 23 s275| wwe | 130 w o 24 s35s | nwe | 140 w IPEMHE 25 | Re-entrant 1A 3 |sa55| twe | 120 H uBjuc 26 $365 | Nwc | 130 4 a 27 $275} twe | 120 H Z 28 s355| nwe | 130 H IPE/HE |W Welded shear connectors (19 mm dia.) IH Hilti shear connectors (110 mm high) E Edge beam All other cases are for internal beams. Note: For construction in the UK, is recommended that UB or UC sections in $275 or $355 steel are specified, because they are readily available. 4BList of Tables - Point load cases HTable| Deck profil Fire | Point | Stee! |Concrete} Slab | Shear | Steel No resistance] load | grade | type |depth| connectors | sections (hrs) | case a) 29 | Re-entrant 1% s |sass]| twe | 120 w uByuc 30 $355 | NWC | 130 w e 31 s275| uw | 120 w is 32 $275 | Nwc | 130 w a 33 $365 | NwC | 130 w IPE/HE 34 $235 | NWC | 130 w G 35 | Re-entrant 1% T |s355} we | 120 w us/uc 36 $355 | Nwc | 130 w : 37 $275] Lwc | 120 w 7 38 $275 | Nwc | 130 w . 39 $355 | Nwc | 130 w IPEHE 40 8 235 | Nwc_| 130 w 7 41 | Medium height | 1% s |s355| wwe | 130 w uB/UC 42 $355 | nwc | 140 w a 43 s275| uwe | 130 w a 44 s356 | _Nwc_| 140 w. IPE/HE 46 | Medium height] 1% t |s355] wwe | 130 w uB/uc 46 $355 | Nwc | 140 w a 47 s275| wwe |130| w d 48 s355| nwo |140| Ww IPE/HE 49 | Medium height| 1% se | s355| Lwe | 130 w Buc 50 $355 | Nwc | 140 w a 51 s275| Lwc | 130 w : 52 $365 | Nwc | 140 w IPEHE 53 | Medium height} 1% Te | s355| Lwe | 130 w uBjuc 54 $365 | Nwc | 140 w s 55 $275} Lwc | 130 w : 56 $365 | Nwc | 140 w IPEMHE 57 | Re-entrant 1% s |sas5| wwe | 120 H uB/uc 58 s355 | nwc | 130 H : 59 s275| wwe | 120 4 : 60 s355 | Nwc_| 130 H IPE/HE 61 | Re-entrant 1% Tt |s355] wwe | 120 H uB/uC 62 $355 | Nwc | 130 H a 63 s275| Lwc | 120 H : 64. $365 | Nwc | 130 H IPE/HE. Is Single point load IT Two point loads (equally spaced) IE Edge beam All other cases are for internal beams. Note: For construction in the UK, it is recommended that UB or UC sections in $275 or S355 steel are specified , because they are readily available.NOTES ON TABLES Internal Beam Composite beam supporting a composite slab with equally spaced adjacent beams. Edge beam Composite beam supporting the edge of a composite slab. A line load of 10 kN/m is included to represent the weight of cladding (e.g. brick and block wall). Imposed load ‘The designer should include an allowance for partitions in the imposed load. Shear connectors Welded stud (19 mm dia. x 95 mm) and Hilti shot-fired connectors (110 mm high) are included. For decks deeper than 60 mm, 120 mm long studs are to be used. Symbols LE maximum span (m) for shear connectors placed in every trough LA maximum span (m) for shear connectors placed in alternate troughs LP maximum span (m) for shear connectors placed in pairs per trough (wide trough profiles) L maximum spacing (m) of primary. beams DE _ imposed load deflection (mm) for shear connectors placed in every trough (for span LE) DA __ imposed load deflection corresponding to span LA DP __ imposed load deflection corresponding to span LP DS deflection (mm) of the beam due to self weight of the floor and the beam in unpropped construction (for span of LE or LP, whichever is the greater) N number of shear connectors in span of primary beam Design criteri: moment resistance of the beam exceeded in the construction stage shear force in composite beam exceeds 0,5 V, nq and the design continues by calculating the reduced moment resistance of the section moment resistance of the composite beam with full shear connection exceeded ‘moment resistance of the composite beam with partial shear connection exceeded limit on the degree of partial shear connection not satisfied (see Section 4.6) meas serviceability stress in the steel exceeded (for edge beams only) total deflection of span/200 exceeded imposed load deflection of span/350 exceeded. This limit is increased to span/500 for edge beams. i natural frequency < 4 Hz NB: For some cases, the beam span corresponding to criterion e is output. This occurs in cases where R, < R, and the minimum degree of shear connection is not achieved. This is not strictly a ‘failure’ criterion but is a warning that the shear connection provided at greater spans is less than the Code limit. 4546DESIGN TABLES FOR COMPOSITE SLABS AND BEAMS WITH STEEL DECKING 47Deck: RE-ENTRANT Table 1 (BEAM DATA ‘SLAB DATA Taternal bear Fire resistance ‘90 mins EEE Uniform load Slab depth 120mm Ripe eee Beam spacing 3.0m Concrete LW : : Steel strength 3355 Strength 25/30 Shear connectors Welded (oylinder/cube) diameter [LERE ERs rere 4003178 54 neofin.e 9 8 37 11. aoressans2hit6 0 18 98 118 x67)12,7 @ 20 40 10.9, xrafiss 9 21 41 10.9 xerhias 9 22 43 109 asrasoin67}i2.7 9 21 40 108 . xuhia2 9 22 41 109 . xa 22 42 109 31 28 109 6 26 xa} 23 43: 109 3328 109 6 24 xoel 23 43: 108 27 39 109 34 29 109 © 22 s3a210x 8 28:40:10.9 34 79°109 6 20 x9} 29 41 109 d6 20.109 6 18 mio 20 40 109 3851 109.6 16 109} 29 39 108 29.91 198 6 15 ma3] ao 32 109 6 4 6102229110) 29 3 109 ‘o “ 20 38 109 42-33 109 612 2837 108 rere a 28 36.108 #3 109 6 0 210 26 68 0 ° ° ° @ 1s [ss e187 80 0 17 010 26 71 9 ° ® 8 16|87 g15 17 63 0 17 on ° 13 ° ° 217/709 16°18 66 9 18 12 ° OM ° ® o18)78 917-19 71 919 xaeee 913 . ons ° 919 [80 9.19 20 75 921 2san25en72)94 9 14 a ° ° ° p21 a4 9 21 20 79 m2 xaefo.0 9 15 . ° ° ° 922/90 9 2221 88 ne norfios 9 16 a 19hoa 919 e ° 224 (98 9 24 22 90 n 25 magjits 9 10 37 108 6 21 ° ° 526 [103 9 26 24 98 n 27 miev}i2a 9 19 40 10.9 @ 15120 9 22 . ° 228 [it ¢ 28 26 10.6 n 20 poassose97f11.5 9 18 96 109 @ 62) ° a 9:26 103-0 26:23 87 h27 ‘a11gh22 9 20 38 10.8 © 92 . 2 278 hoa ¢ 26 25 103 n 20 mia7fi2a ¢ 21 40 109 © 14 h24 9 24 ° 3 e218 6 220 wisehiaa 122 41 109 © 12 [130 9 28 ° 3 en h20 6 228 naghas 121 38 109 6 10/138 | 27 : . 29729 8 oa Haaoias | 20.37 109 @ 8 [iaz | 26 96 109 6 i om haz a8 raspiae | 20.25 109 © 7 147 125 94 109.8 i sua liae 0 Pers seeraearizafias | 23 40 109 © 12/132 g 26 37 109 ° 220/122 6 226 nisqfiae | 22 39 10.9 6 10/138 | 28 38 109 « ° oe |128 9 oz Ri7vjia2 | 22 a7 109 @ 9 [142 1 27 36 108 © 12 [199 © 218/34 8 19 raoaliane | 21 36.109 «8 [ies (26 35 10 whi3e 9 7 For further information eee notes preceding Table 1Deck: RE-ENTRANT Table 2 BEAM DATA SLAB DATA {Imerat weary Fie raison SSS Unitorm load Slab depth 130mm TE S Beam spacing 30m] — | Conorte nw ; : Stoel strength 5355 | Srengen 28130 < w7 Shear connectors Weided |__| feyinger/oubo iA AENEAN Ee Gaetan SAB Ent 60 28 | pescuarion be Dal BE Os tA BALE be al ese z Be BS Be Sey a Zosisses]se 0 7 7 77 28 [oa aeeiozcafet ¢ : 7 oe toler s Sales a : oe ae ciolss 6 asevuscailen: 6 ° oe ao atoler « sat 6 = oe a8 ettloe saps ° a0 oa aie o soorioacaad oo ° 8 : oi lee 378 0 ° #10 : aialee @ osama nt : $19 : giz|r0 @ Tale @ 2 on ° rena brans soea : a 2 sieire soonosxaafat g : on ° gie|r @ sedes ¢ 2 oa ° sie|ze 6 asoxtencsa] a0: 6 ° on 8: ois|aa 8 aa3|86 0 ° a2 : Siete a se]aa ° on : ° : seosvicrsi] 92 * oa q ‘ ‘ tasfse. 6 : oi : ° ‘ sconirarsdfion 5 os : : ° * ° a8 : : ° refi 6 ° 7 : : ° sadn : ot fs S ° sspaactahiog' 3 m8 ° @ ‘ sedfiis 0 ° ot ° & ° sepa 9 ° oe * : ‘ Siae ¢ om : : : reas 9 : i 2 < : ssmonerae @ 3 8 ° ° ° relea s : on 5 : ° cssocioceshiaa : oe % : ° “ona : a2 : : ° noifieg : ta : : * soofias : ia : : : Sehien : ia : : ‘ ahs e in : : ° Tasheo | : ia : 7 ' iohies 5 i : 7 \ aes a0] 68.9 ° * ° * eee : : : v3 ‘ 2 ° 2 : t : . * ‘ gove ae702 ¢ * an a ois a7 woes : ta $ $19 30 108 © : ou ‘ 920 10 108 © : at : ia aioe 6 x om ‘ UH 1086 a a) ‘ iio a 100 6 = 72 i 022 42 108 « 26 36 108 © 028 : tats toe By 7 to8 s +3 i 12 fe foe a 0 to0 in For further information se8 notes preceding Table 1Deck: RE-ENTRANT Table 3 BEAM DATA ‘SLAB DATA Tternal bear Fire resistance 30 mins Uniform loas Slab dopth 120 mmm | Beam spacing 3.0m Concrete, ww Stel strength $275 Strength 25/30 Shear connectors Welded (eyfinder7cube) ERB ERint Ed $s 3 108 27-402 29 108 31 109 33 109 34 109 33 109 31 108, 32 108 34 109 Table 1 eeeeegess 27 28 109 © 12 {139 26 35 108 « 10 [163 For further information see notes procesDeck: RE-ENTRANT Table 4 beam DATA suas para [internat bear [ Fire resistance ‘30 mins Ta r. ? Unto ad Seo sep fonm eee fom onc aom| | etme wr Pai ‘Steel strength $275 ‘Strength (25/30 cae oN ‘Shear connectors Welded (eylinder/cube) Mey cee gamer” “sms xT eee paren | 2 ralee ina! ‘ sonia t fnlen : if sovaodrer| aa: ¢ stefan s : ta nofas ¢ oiefas ¢ ‘3 Sele | coast ‘ a ‘ates preceding Table 1Dec! RE-ENTRANT Table 5 ‘BEAM DATA SLAB DATA ‘ternal bear [Fire resistance ‘SO mine Uniform load Slab depth 130 mm Beam spacing 3.0m Concrete NW ‘Steel strength 5'355 Strength 25130 Shear connectors Welded (eyiinder/eube) iameter 19m [proeer LOAD Nit poesignamion | TED pee bs we 100 3 ° ° 200 ° . ° ° 360 4 ° * ° 40 16 ° ° ° 500 19 ° ° ° WEA 100 120 wo [az 0 3 17 40 0 66 ee )at eB ass Shanes ee oe yoo |aa 4 20 56 9 $5 i 48g 7/479 6 17 445 (46g 7 15 430 9 too [ss 05 22 53 9 $6 20 stg 8/829 6 18°60 .9.10) 820: 9:17 48 0.31 zo |e2 56 26 60 @ $7 22 889 10/599 8 20 569 11|58 9 10 18 849 13 20 |70 9 8 25 87 9 $9 28 65g M] 67 91022 63.g19| 65 0 12-20 61 9 14 ga 78 9 9 23°75 0 G11 28 73.9 13/249 12 23 71g 15/72 9 14 21 68 9 16 200 a6 9 10 31 83 0 212 28 80g tes g 14 25°77. 17/789 16 22°75 0 18 aa [9a 911 38 90 9 cia a1 67 9 16) 88 9 6 27 84g 18/85 9 18 2 81 9 201 200 fto2 9 13 36 99 9 $15.09 86 9 18] 96 9 1879" 0.2920) 9379 20:75:89 0°22] 220 fos 9 14 39 108 © $17 95 103 @ 19|103 g 20 30 99 g 22/1009 2 27 98 a 24 aio fine 9 15 «1 108 © 018 97 108 » 18/109 9 2t-82/108°9) 29/106 9°23 78/1019 25| aso fi22 9 16 43 108 © 219 28 106 » 16[115 9 22 34 108 © 21/112 26] 400 148 45 108 @ 0:22 41 106 12/126 9 25:96 1086 16 [129.9 20 “0 ie 42 108 © {2s at 106.6 8 [140 9 29 29 106 12/136 9 22 % 108 © 15 500 118 40 108 « {a3 39 tos @ 7 (180-1 23 98 106% 9|148 1-98) 98:108 «11 880 i 18 a8 108 © | a2 a7 toee §|157 | 29 96 1066 7/186 1 35 35 Wee 8 600 ise 37 108 6 22 361086 4/165 129 95106 4 8 {1835i 34841080 7 HE 100 320 o37 ioniegaa +40 o8 9 a8 a5 Bae g 7/480 160 55 2253 9 96 2 sig ess 180 56 2 60 9 37-2359 9 10/600 200 28 277 68 9 9.9 2 679 12/680 220 28 3076 9 On 27 74993) 788 240 01052 84 9 912 29 829 15/836 260 Joe 9 12 38 92 0 a1 1 909 18) 900 220 fos 9 13 37 100 a 915 33 97 9 18/989 200 514 40 108 © $17 26 106 ¢ 20|108 9 20 220 916 42 108 « 518 28 106 « 17 2 0 517 44 108 © $20 49 106 14/118 9 23 200 218 45 108 « G21 41 106 12/126 9 24 400 18 43 108 6 122 42 106 ¢ 10/139 9°27 480 118 40 108 6 i a2 39 1086 7/146 1 29 500 117 38 106 6 baa a7 toee 6 {i551 28 580 147 a7 106 8 122 46 1060 5 {i021 26 £00, 147 95 106 @ jaa 36 06 4 )i701 20 For further information see notes preceding Table 1 52Dec! RE-ENTRANT Table 6 BEAM DATA SLAB DATA Internal beam Fire resistance 30 mine Uniform load ‘Slab depth 130 mm Beam spacing 3.0m] | Concrete Nw ‘Steel strongth $235] | Strength 25130 (cyindericubo) T LOAD wNint 3s 48 60 DESIGNATION | LE—~De-Ds~tA ba] UE Bus “TA ba} 1 DE OSTA ba fF [re 160 190 [4a s . ne aae 2518 430 6/400 8 11 40g 8 200 }5.0. 9 . i518 soe 4717 494 7/404 5 1 aaa 8 220 [se : e720 beg 4818 baa 8/494 8 12 «ee 6 210 [639 ° pe 2 629 a797 874 8/824 6 eta 6 2m |72 6 ° v9 2 709 aa 63a els7e 70 8747 300 Jaro ° an 7e@ eas a4 slesa en cae 8 320 Joo 9 ° 41229 884 810 19 774 a9 6940 360 foo 9 12 26 10.0 @ $13.20 944 ai i9 aaa @1092 764 6 soo fina p14 40 111 g 4108 @ 14 32 108 9 a9 934 san aso fia 9 16 44 125 9 16116 416 99 116 4 Me l104 ta 21 108 4 61218 98 419 b00 fie 4 19 49 139 6 19/129 4 18 35 1294 18/116 4 se 23 118 4 16/122 © 24 28 108 4 17 ss0! fie 119 45 108 © 6 [147 4 23 44 1064 @[t4ac 29 40: 108s 11/1946 27 90 1086 18 00 fis.e 118 42 106 ¢ 5 |157 123 41 1066 6liss 1 20 40 108 0 8|tae ¢ 90 39 106 6 10 WEA 100 120 140 ° ° * ° oss are reo [es 9 3 . : e617 47g een 4c 6 10 [559 * o . O77 sae 672496 6 200 Jo2 9 ° ° ° asi 578 a7n sia? 220 |70 4 ° ® ° ¢ 9 636 21220 674 240 2 3 . ° anama oa a3 g 250 a ° ° a oa 28776 06 22 aod 280 . . ° ° 1627 834 018 2 75 4 300 fiozs 5 ° ° 018 29 90.8 32025 aad 320 hoa 9 ° ° ° 920 90 07 4 32227 89d 10 fin 9 ° ° 5 9232 024 223 20 844 300 fi2.2 o . 3 ° 9 22 4 106 « 9 25 29 994 400 fiat ° 3 ° 5 25 36.106 «: 9 28 32 1066 aso faa : ' : 2 29 39 108 & 992 04 108 « ‘ . ' . 1 29 30 1066 138 36 106 « t . ‘ . 139-35 108 4 13636 105 6 7 8 2 23/39 93 16 ° 94/48 95 8 469 5/450 617 456 oes ° 5 |s4 98 20 649 8/639 7 19 536 o8 7 sean 3 98/62 97 23 599 10/809 9 20.8719 o10 18 s4432 ° 910/70 9 8 25 a7 qo N|6ag 11 22 64g 212: 60413 ° ON) 77 git 27 74919) 78 919 24°74 w 96 2-67.41 o 913/86 9 12 29 829 15/03 9 14 28 78g 2 23 74 9 1 3 914/93 91431 90 9 16|909 1627 86 9 0 8 25 80 4 18 a 915/101 9 15 33 97 9 18/98 9 18 79 93 9 8 20 26 96 4 19 3 €15 109 9 17 36 108 20/106 9 20:31 10'@ 922.27 os 4 22 3 ©13 116 9 18 38 108 6 17/112 9 22 33 108 © 3 24 29 103 4 23 a 21123 9 20.40 106 0 t4|i1e 9 23 34 108 6 8 25 20 106 4 24 ° 210/129 921 41 1060 t2|124 9 24 36 106 9 27 32 1066 71 ‘ ©8138 122-42 1066 toltas g 27 a8 108 6 2 20.33 106 6 16) ‘ 26 147 122 39 1066 7\146 1 20 8 108 © 2 24 36 106 « 121 ‘ © 4/50 122 37 1066 65s 1 26 36 1086 13435 10¢6 8 ‘ 4 [iss 1 22 26 1060 slte2s 28 a 106 © 13638 toes 8 i 3 174 122 95106 6 4117.0 4 28 44 106 6 i633 108 3 6 For further information see notes preceding Table 1 53Dec! SHALLOW Table 7 BEAM DATA SLAB DATA ince beats Tio rsstance 90 ins SEES Untorm eas Stab coptn tas Ponape Beam spacing som] [cone iw eae Stel strength 33s] | Stern 25130 gaia ‘Shear connectors: (cylinder/cube) Ey NEY < Somer PEER eo _] ese | ey 3 sosaanaifes : cielres H o20 assess 9 12 0 8 8 sales ‘ on Talae 92 0: TNE Regus 0 ene pimeae ci nals p22: aoe rapes ar 5s Rie ta ee Sigs cree (apg atige ee For further information see notes preceding Table 1- 54Deck: SHALLOW Table 8 beam para sian pata Terabe Te esance Si Se Unomoad Sivceni ten POE STS bev ng 2om] |eenset rr i EES Stecstongh Se || Seta 2sis0 pee : ‘Shear connectors Welded {eylinder/cube) NE ame Sele Sse ale gee ale eee ee eee ee Sfeo : BE tases enoaseifen ners : pili s courstifee ¢ hohe : olay snaiclaher gas : Lola rower 3 a : Doha $ sovensisy|i 9 te 99° pal iforgaa Kocher twa | : =o tea! For further information see notes preceding Table 1. 55‘SLAB DATA Deck: SHALLOW BEAM DATA Tnternal bear Uniform load Beam spacing 3.0m Fire resistance Slab depth Concrete Strength (eylinder/cube) 30min 128 mm Ww 25/30 56 For further information see notes preceding Table 1 Em = err [ee aDeck: MEDIUM Table 10 BEAM DATA SLAB DATA Tnternal Boar iro resistence 0 mins Se Say Uniform toad Slab depth 130 mm Be Beam spacing 3,0.m Concrete LW Steel strength 5'355, Strength 25130 Shear connectors. Welded (cylinder/cube) diameter 19mm LER 4s ogsguarion Pe se ee | 2osasax 30) 2 254102x 2) 210 x24) on 250014603] ou Tia 25 x 318/78 ‘088102% 2 012 (72 x3 s3| 77 30801277) 16] 79 xa] s7]a2 x43} ia las 3050185 49] 1a ]93 56127 33 aq asoct714 45] 406384029 doen 7ax 84 6 x9] asratsox53] x07 xa asic1914 07 ssaae210% 87 xo 0) ioe} s1oxazaxi01 2377 99 9 26 ht02 tabibs veagazregmdendzeae a . ° xiaq 3835 16.4 nad 27 nes i zos20s a6] 7.8. 3 10)23) a0) 20/R4 98 [a6 @ xal78 9 012 38 69) Aes 917/69 6 xeol79 9 e135 deg | xnlos ¢ Peres oem: 6 xe]a0 9 1527+ OT ie = asaasexrafoe gt a1: |. lo 917 28 o19 4. | lee o xeofio2 ge a2 > | \98 g 1830 | 9225 - ° moos 917 35: SS hos a9 31 ona - ° maqjing 9 18 37 va g 21 a3 97420 | ° misrfize 9 20 40 jizz 923 26 oa.) hte sossaosearfiicrig ag a7 02. shinai gaz aan e259280 oo o auigps 9.2030 | han gaa as em 29. = htt @ eaay oe 92636 pw hte p42 + + = hs2 920 a7 922 = - 2 ina 9 $3 40 faa 8 ae eas. 2 hate apse has 4 ar a7 oa - | heey Vola ss hiss 4 26 a Paaae 2 hee 9 tma: ia g a7 37 om | heey fasao : +: |iea 9 29 90 oa. | ° ia ea 28 37 oem. | hae 9 ee a jas i 20 36 fas 95 ato Fr further information see notes preceding Table 1Deck: MEDIUM BEAM DATA, Table 11 internal bearn Uniform load Beam spacing Steel strongth diameter Shear connectors SLAB DATA Fire resistance 30 mine Slab depth 140 mm, Concrete Nw Strength 25130 (oylinder cube) ra SARs DESIGNATION Oey DP os = oe ‘200x199 20 25axt02x 25 asanvasx 3168 xa7]72 xaa] 76 2osei0z 28] 72 205nt27% 37179 x42] 9.2 ras} s0sctesx 40] 8.3, x46 | 8.7 salon asox12% 33] 82 x29] 0.8 soeer40% 39] 9,4 xashion. 406017854) 106, eoftt zor) xrbrs arate 92)i0.1 oof? ra2hao asmuore7h22 xaofias xoehis9 sanezi0r82)t42 xazpss 3109] x22] 1012295101 2osz03% 46) 68 x52] 741 x60| 74 anf xas]as 250258x 73] 3.0 x09 | 9.6 mahi arpa msehiz9 wio8f3.7 raahia.2 rasa} aseca60%28192 me7h1.9 081208% 97]11.0 naa has 38 hao 24 é csshos 2 hia his 26-51) = Sea Phas esa <= PT hao 2 thee 32 zhao 58 For further information eee notes preceding Table 1Deck: MEDIUM Table 12 seam para sian TA tera bear 7) frereentnes so min SES Sam oe Si ssn tome Pe or specra 2am] conse re ; 3 Steet strangth $275 ‘Strength 25/30 NG Stercowscors — Weided] | tyne f Ney Xe Sareie senor S/cme aie safe : ‘ ‘ role : : : sale : : ‘ sencuot fod : : ‘ hoy ¢ : : ‘ Sofas tio so ns S : : Seite 12s soawrafes tae | : : vim ae era “fae $20 39 ae todas gna 2” tem! lodies Tio 2” tae! noles ze ce Safes i> teas! For further information see notes preceding Table 1 59Deck: MEDIUM Table 13 BEAM DATA SLAB DATA Trea bare Te ranbtance SO mi Sa Unto toa Sib depth 120 mm TEE eee Bonn spas aom] — | eons tae sate : Stee strength 3355 |_| Stangen 25/90 “Sf NESS Sino comecters tevinercube Santer a Saoaton | 7 — OF Tole es woe «[ang et = ee eRe a ae ae 7 Sos sem ery ejsoe 7 oo 2/436 Hi oo) So srs s|see ee coe oles on Srlesse am erewlere 92 see n| soe oa oath bs a coe i[roen a eee lees aa Siler giv as 72a] 289 12a8 749 te) 988 to Sialoo 13 31 seg tel are ts a7 azo fol os $2 Sis|ss gis as os 18] 90 er ae at p20) 996 Ae ‘ $ eA icv cela as tee alsae ow ate ol are a oh cece (ss sea szp a[seg 0 800%) 036 on Bo [tl ob ee ciolro sew cog long ia eeu tle e A elo 8 Bos alse on a tee u| see tae 726 10) 94 ta wo fer vom Sab CU abisge helene " oo fice os a7 fiw ll cfasgua st case s so faa oie Sieg ll ifneaa 2 chee : xo fas eis ss | > fates Mone: : to fan eis ce 2s fasgae ae 2c faee wo : Sheela. thal iagee - : wo iss ita = till fiat eae: 1 mo fea ste os eee ee Q So fetes tp isis Lt ae Wasa vlan ge aa oe oe Bs otou wjeze aa ss a Oita ar as tog wear 3 Lifes gaia i i jeag wae: a Lfeb ots Sef jo 8 we : LIM gargs li ftoe ¢ a0 a2 _ DiMla tte ge ll liege : IRM Gah Lat Ss DORR So bi fe $e ges ba iso 1 as 40 fas te : fee tas aes citar tae ar fer ioe |) lista Me ioe lias ae For further information see notes precoding Table 1Deck: MEDIUM Table 14 BEAM DATA SLAB DATA [internat bear ie resitange 80 mins EEE Untorm load Sab sopth 130 mm adie aaro ces Beam spacing aem| | concrete iw Stel strength 5'308] | Srenan 2820 [NES NE Shear connectors Welded |_| evlindericube) VE é daneter ae a a ee cea Sai roomamadee g 8 21 68 9 10/e8 9 9 18 4 et e219:38 ep faite ts mal a sancnafes ¢ 8 aim at gi se tte so an ‘ jue game >t ae ee Moias tas lag gare 2 es fees Topas azo) ua tapas 2 2S mae Gmuaritse'c cclwp uaa cle he sie aseanectzdis? 9 23 00 Nar gas a fa wisshas ae at faa ga a7 taal: nike: 1s 00 feo gap ses Dl ilae pa odes 133 te faa tne Liha $a zn : For further information see notes precading Table 1 61Deck: MEDIUM Table 15 BEAM DATA SLAB DATA [leeorat bea [ie resstancs 80 nine ae SG | Union oaa Sb depth 140mm goeoawene | Beam spacing aem| | concrete nw Steal strenath $355 | | Stengn 25/20 fe Shows connectors tendered a diameter BEsGATION 200813 264x102 2 santa] xa xa 205x102 29 05165 4] x54 s6«127% 33) 28601713 45 x67 4002140539 x6) asraiore6] Tt) x09 ‘sassztor 29 x99 xo} 109 ee ah ° a8 as a pas es jr20 fiz 32 is a0 he 104 xq x6 2425473 x29 109] m6} 081208 97 x194| 2240] 7289] 286x260) xn 62 hz has nas 36 2 37 0 For further information see notes proceding Table 1Deck: MEDIUM Table 16 BEAM DATA SLAB DATA [intemal bear Fire resistance 90 mine Uniform toad Slab depth 130 mm Beam spacing 3.6m Concrete LW Stoo! strength 8.275 Strength 25130 ‘Shear connectors Welded (cylinder/cube) diameter See 0081 3 25001464 31 x3) xa xq s0sc168x 9] a560127% 29] x29| xo] 4ooxt40x 2 x67 x7 x87 as7a191% 67 x7 xo sa2210% 09] x9] oy 109] xe 07] maa] ney x37 wi59| Hes te ia are) 1348 ne9 18°24 m2 2128 2326 a7 nu Bu 35 For further information see notes preceding Table 1. 6Deck: MEDIUM Table 17 BEAM DATA SLAB DATA Toternal bear Fira resistance ‘90 mine Uniform toad lab depth 140 mm Beam spacing 3.6m] | Concrete NW Steel strength 355] | Strength 25/30 Shear connectors Welded |_| [oyinder/cubo) diameter = | LOAD KNin? 60. DESIGNATION DEL oF ose oF 3 ° op slaze oe ° a 6/470 9 815 43 9 10 ° 9 8/520 1916 48971 ° 210/589 21097 62412 ° 011/65 9 912 19 sod 14 ° 913/749 ou 2 esd 15 ° 9 15/82 0 016 22 73.417 ° 917/909 21924 80 410 ° 101 9 one: 5 Dijiae pa ° area 02022 - : ears saree oS 160 84 ° 2 7/450 6 16 429 8/440 7 15 a1 0 9 180 os 5 o 8/5107 18 47 910/509 8 16 480 1 200 ee 3 510/87 9 9 19 53.9 1| 569 10 17 529 12 220 a7 8 O 11/64 91021 60.9 13/62 912 19 580 14 240 39 ° 513/71 9 12 23 67 9 18/69 9 14 20 05 0 18 200 $10 + [39g 42. Soe] ze 916 21 220 on 3 Bs 9 16 2 azgi2 - - 300 13 . C[e2edar 5 St )ae ean 2 320 ot a7 ho2 g 16 33 99 19 2 | 36 9 21 25 i sao fina 9 15 38 hos 9 18 3. ros e210. -os x04 gaa 3602 t 30 016.40 - - iis 9 19 36 M4 g 22 2. + | i107 9 4 28 318 ° e208 2 fie argos ta ° omar - - -|iat 9 a a3 ois . p26 ea fiaale as ae 212 ° oata7 - + |uze aa - | a0 : te ays jazi wea 59120 46 01021 61g p22 2 16 26 0 18 20 ema : oo : ga are : ca” i azo 1918 For further information see notes preceding Table 1Deck: DEEP Table 18 SEAM DATA SLAB DATA Finenat bear Tie resance 30 mw <= Uniform load ‘Slab depth 140 mm * = . team cm om] | once tw oe : tose S858] | Stenan 25/00 | Sheer connectors Welded |_| feyinderiobe) Lay AE Sameter : > ° ° 22 r ° : ‘ ain : : ‘: ‘ on : : : cielo a ae sossoatae|7s 9 : : filers oe cals 8 : fF Giles @ sie somanalincg ae 7a 8 ‘ sielee a oie Selo git ar rao r baker ae Selon giz a0 a0 : Siete. a an soowtestaofar tz a7 27 fr Guin ie siden oie a0 ano fF ctalra an Ides ie 29 08 6 : salr s a aseuzrca|so'g 12 a7 8 6 iieleas ats Miles gto ae 02 t Siies s an asenricas|o0 9 14 30 88 a fF cuir ate saifas 1s 30 oto : ciolez HH Solas gis oa 6 F cles 3 on soonsocsifan g 16-20 80 9 : Sierra an cislae gts a2 94 9 fale @ Sislea 3 on sosnrecsifion @ 18 3399 on los 6 sees ¢ oto Seofios 9 17 3 100 @ $22 100 8 tieles an ofa ete ae 107 a fies & cries 3 Side 6 19 90 tag $ ze{ioy g 26 a7 toa 9 a7hos tae ssnosactapon p17 36 108 9 $asltoo $ an ae oa sar foae oie Sofie g 18 36 109 oulos oa a ma oalor ¢ in Sofia ei a tas Galina eae a0 toa sas {ioe ¢ oa siz ¢ 0 30 Tas falta o¢ 29 107 ¢ 2% (ioe @ oa Lufae sar ta Sued gar as ttn sao s a ssmsoreeyfig 919 97 ins Sasiino eae ae tos vas foe ¢ tn infer ga gna chefine o 26 a9 12 a0 (ra i Koytas p30 tna tiofas 20s na carieo s an ssnarorapfiae gan jis Siofae pao ar wies as |tiaee fae Tofiee gas ae nt cirfies ess ma sa fae « wi Toes fas se tha cise eso ne ear hee oi Tooeo fas aa tna tiefet eae seme saw fae & oa] najea cas arias Dishes eae gett o17 feo ta Tommaso 8 2902 9 Wes 9192 61 28 oi|t78 7 redos g 4 uae gtzea pit on pt files 5 : Xora gt a0 Gs 2/21 9 12 22 oF gat files o : iol on a ta eta ys ots at an 9 ts Bae : rodez 012 2 9 ote 00 a4 25 78 918 fies asmasecrfay ge m8 aa g tales gts as a) a8 f . Neoe gis 80 stron 5 28 calea 5 Kevs ow ae tet oat as tm Sar{ios & 4 sossanscerfoy p18 20 1029 20 fos o2 bas[se 3 : iadis gan asia safe ¢ oa pans ‘ For further information see notes preceding Table 1.Deck: DEEP Table 19 BEAM DATA SLAB DATA Tternal beam Fie resistance 30 mine Uniform load Slab depth 180mm Beam spacing 4.0m Concrate Nw ‘Steel strength $355, Strength 25130 Shear connectors Welded {eylindercude) iameter TEA Nar 2, 45 50 87 eegevesevvevooeely ecouawe For further information see notes preceding Table 1. 66Deck: BEAM DATA [internal bears — Uniform toad Beam spacing Steel strength Shear connectors ameter DEEP SLAB DATA [Fire resistance Slab dopth Concrete Strength (cylinder/eube) aE xaal 30521655 40 95031274 39 x29] 35001715 4 x6) 2061405 3 408x178 5 xo asyq1sax 3] x67 xaq sanatox el eal my 109] na hie h20 hz. 2a 29 has a2 Bw ocanhigenccHncaadagaade esrarror[g ay 2S gy ames | ue 002829) 79 : > : x38 5 = ea 205209040) 6.6 zap xeela2 no} 20810064 99] “a9| x2)| 199) m2 ‘s0xa6ant2 189] 2 a» 20 2 2 For further information see notes preceding Table 1, 3 4 4 4 ‘ é 3 $ @ 3 3 3 4 4 3 ¢ i209 128 138. lio pes Me ne 14 ee~oe lieDeck: MEDIUM Table 21 BEAM DATA SLAB DATA Edge beam Fire resistance 30 mins Uniform load ‘Slab depth 130 mm Beam spacing 3.0m Concrete lw Steal strength $365 Strength 25/30 Shear connectors Welded (eyfinder/oubo) diameter CBA Eine [oesiaxaTion Bee x29l 250014602] aoezna7]78§ xaa]so xaalon 050168 40} 8.0 x39 sent 71x af xy 406417084 asratsax 52 x6 xo) xml xe xaq 201210% 82 mio9)iao maias sioxzzento:pia.8 4060 asmasen 78.5 17 12 88 16 10 15 xeon 18 12 9.0 17 10 r soos 119 13 95 win v magio » 20 33 10.3 212 meyfiog » 22 14 109 12 e 0810084 97}10.2 8 20 13 102 201 18 magfio.7 » 22 14 10,7 nw 28 19 waving n 204 12 22 2 hie m 23 14 118 23 107 toa m2 pas 3.8 2518 126 26 16 331 20 18138 48 120, a asera6exi70)11.8 24 14 118 2312 108 104 m2 aisajiaa 625 14 123 2413 m4 roan 22 ninfiag 6 26 15 128 25 13 m8 we 123 paoafia2 6 27 16.132 2614 123 wig For further information 608 notes preceding Table 1 68Deck: MEDIUM Table 22 BEAM DATA SLAB DATA Edge beam {Fire resistance 90 mins Unitorm load Slab depth 140 mm ees Beam spacing 3.0m Concrete Nw Spee Steel etrangth 3.355 Strength 25/30 of yy Shear connectors Welded (eyfinder/oube) ee | diamater Tae, ESA ent as as 80 28 SGN Eos eee os Or os DET or os te oe 208e139% 30] 3 azine ey * RN 1, 8e git 2sexr02% 26] 66 13 14 64 * naz to x29 ua 67 ‘ n32 10 2saniasezn} 70 18:68 » hea40 x3 147 » 13 10 x4 wens n 16 10 05x102% 2 18 729 15 [60 10 x34 10 s05a77<37) 10 xaq a s05¢108% 40 10 nae 10 356177429] 10 aa] a x67 4" s06e140x 29] wnt x4ol ts b ® 8 8 fh ® se ]7a-n f ag|az in en wean t 18/87 5 s00170x 5410.3 n selon nie xeofto.7 n 20/94 nie 11 xerfvo n 20/07 n 20 12 shiva n a1 |ioo n 20 12 asrasaxszhioe n 20 9.6-2m 19092 woofs * 21/100 4 2012 xorfinz * zhoa na 12 xrahiz0 » hos 5 2.19 xefea ® aa|n0 a2 19 asystoin 7h? > za lioa nat 12 nfo n 22107 nat 38 xaqi23 ® 23 og 422 19 sasha n 2 in2 m3 33 xash2.9 h 24/115 82333 samziox eaho.2 h 2s |ii.80W 2 xaahiar 5 26 hi22 4 2814 moipso 8 26/128 20 14 moghaa » 2a hia m 2018 waza h nae ‘Sroxzaontoifia8 . nae saishis2 5 he 14 wasps ® 28 15 maadhis.2 31 [15 2015 205«20% 46 7.0" 9 » 2) 0 xoal72 h 5 13 10 xo0]78 5 nia 10 anl7s s nie 10 nae] n nae 10 2swasen73]87 6 5 nis 10 » 8 nae 10 hos» . hie a2 * n 20 12 fon 8 nove ho n nan ee awa 8 2012 fie 23 8 + hain bern 28 18 122 ® Inia mn 2949 has 1 26 19 129, » hii9 hn 24 18 i 2720736 h 28h 2814 » 26 » hor n 22 12 . 2a 17 33 5 2 n 22 32 ® ws 126 n live n 29 13 n 13131 h lr20 nh 24 13Deck: MEDIUM Table 23 BEAM DATA SLAB DATA Edge beam Fire resistance 90 mins Uniform load Slab depth 130 mm Beam spacing 3.0m Concrete we Steel strength 3275 Strength 25/30 Shear connectors Welded (eylinderrcube) ‘diameter TS, eae . s . 5 ‘ f rsifoa nig 12 93 4 » xe 19 12 96h * 46u1 40x 29 ' 8 nag 1 5 ‘406217884 ' 6 x69 ‘ 5 asian 8] t n x64 1 n xa 1 eer 22 nat 2ahio7 ha asrai91< 6) i na 2 21 10 108 ¢ 21 fio. n 20 = ‘ na 12 22 10 108 © 22 oa n 20 xaq ‘ naa 22.11 112 4 22 fo? nz 1 hme 13 zany ana i alive nz « ' has 13 za any i zelina n 23 ‘sa0x2t0. 22 . nas 13 2a 1204 26:)118 28 x99 ‘ n 26 13 25 11 124 1 28 [120 n 24 xo} i nae 20-11 128 | 26/129 h 25 noofiso h 29 16 140 1 naw 28 12 130 1 26125 25 wiaahas 29 16 145 1 nz 14 27:12 134 + 27 h29 n 26 eroxz29i0ifi88 & 29 16 146 | nao 14 2712 136 1 27 hat he miahsa : nm 14 20 12 140 1 28 fia n 27 masjise ‘ B20 15 2912 144 6 29|138 h 28 siaghie. ‘ 31s, 2013 42 12083 h 29 2083200844 ° ry 12 8 62 hi |s9 h12 6 69 naz x99 ° nwo 13.6 64 n19[61 nz 6 61 niZ x69 ° ne 10 13.8 G7 HU [64 n13 7 64 HID a) ° nis 10 148 70 Nia|e7 nie 7 87 nie xeq ° nie 10 45 8 74 W381 Ne 7 Tt He 202860 7 ° nis 10 te 8 78 hi6|74 N15 7 74 HIS xe ° a7 70 17 8 G2 hi7\79 N16 7 79 n16 07/98» ' hawt 179 7 navies nay 7 a3 nar maq}ion » ' n 20 12 199 92 ni9[eo nis 6 89 nie meipios » ‘ nat 32 2010 190 420/96 H19 9 96 HID 2061008" 97[102 1 208 19.9 93.n [eo nie 8 ae ne mrafio7 1 na 20.10 98 4 20|94 n19 8 94 n 19 mana h 1 nm 2 2110 103 h2i [99 20 8 39 p20 wasehins » : n23 13 22:11 102 | 22 ft09 n 21 9 103 nat miod2.4 5 : he t3 2311 ins i 2a [10 n22 10 110 1 a2 © rzaahia.t ‘ n 2018 2612121 124 (17 23.10.1071 a8 mapas 5 ‘ nar as 2613128 4 26129 6 28 11123 1 25 aserasant70)11.8 i n23 12 22 10 108 | 22|04 n 21 9 104 h 2 misofi23 i ashi n 203 2 zat) ina | aafoe nz 9 109 naz ninjas » 26 )i26 425 13 ae live nae 11 118 1 2a hina has 8 Tne 1 28 raga 127 |r28 n 26 14 2ohizg hos 11122 i 26 (118m 26 10 118 |e 70 For further information see notes proceding Table 1.Deck: MEDIUM Table 24 BEAM DATA SLAB DATA ‘Edge beam | Fre resistance 30 ming Sey Uniform load Slab depth 140 mm ee Beam spacing 3.0m Concrete Nw x Stoo! strength 5'385 Strength 25/30) = f Xe ‘Shear connectors Welded (cylinder/oube) lameter 13mm — —____- ———— LOAD kit 5 4s 29. 28 DESIGRATION | OF > OF Ds EEF se = mmm om] mmm om ot we 160 [408 @ 98519 48 19).8) am 9 20 amjors [4a ng 1 ¥sl eB 180 ° 2 910 14 819 10/48. 10 12 4a 10/464 8 10 469 9 200) 3 * Nato 14 BO gitt] BBN TEA Sa got] erm tO ION sca: 10] 220 * a i214 609 12|50n 12 12 58g 12/850 11 10 85 911 240 Joa. o 1974068 gota] 62 notsitto\a2 gi13}'90 m2 10: 8asgo43| zo [7s 5 ° N15 1@ 729 18/69 n i 12 69.9 14/66 h 12 10 66 9 13] soo: fas n ® hve 15: goog Ne jong WAS A207 eig sf Zs KIS 10:79 R | 330 [arn ° 18 15 87 9 8/63 n 17 12 839 17/80 n 16 11 Bon 16 aso |ae 5 18 1688p 18 |'atoM mR I eT GT) RTOS Bani 49, 400 fos n ' 21 47 105 | 21/100 n 20 14 100 + 20/96 m 19 12 96 h 19) ‘450: f:20° : asia tte so8 | nna AB MTT ze] 107m ae Iz IOI aT soo fiaz 5 ‘ 26 18 120 i 26/122 n 25 18 122 1 » sso. fies 5 : 2819-159 ¥ 26/139" 1 * 00 ‘ ‘i 90 20 18:11 90/144 h i n HEA 100 120 [aro ° 07 3 4107 40, [arg ° oe wares reo [69 ° hazii4 59g 12 200 n ° hia 4 649 12 220 |7.3)1n 3 hee 70 go 240 h 3 nie 779 16 200 Jas ° nay we e2 7 300 8 ° hie as es Fag) 320 5 : 20 16 101 | 29 340 n p BEA IO7 128 360 5 ‘ naw n2i 2 400: s F Rae aT2 g ze 480 5 : a7 we 132 1 a7 500 : . hag igiee 123) 550 ' ' 130 19 1531 9 500. ‘ i 41-3019 16.013)/20 HEB 100) 3 01081552 g 30) « hi is 589 12 5 nts a5 88629) h nia 71g 14 8 neqeo177 9:36 x ni7 18 84g 17 n HTB I BONN Te 5 ni 1 96 1 19 mez2 49 107 wartensoai 24 has 19 113 hm 17 1091 22 N24 19 988 2g tata h 25 20 123 hae 17 119 1 28 27°20 192 fae t8p 1281028 faa 20 143 n20 19 140 1 28 a7 20:18. 1 90/18" 98.00/90 2710166. hoge sa s88 20 For further information see notes preceding Table 1. nDeck: RE-ENTRANT Table 25 BEAM DATA SLAB DATA internal bear Fire rosistance ‘0 mine Tee Uniform load ‘Slab depth 120mm * # Beam spacing 3.0m Concrete lw ee ‘Steel strength $'355, Strength 25/30 j Shear connectors, (oylinder/cube) height Ta, LBRO EN 60 ESIGNATION oe] Por os ee Berge ol aman Se gt 17 85 a 1s woler a11 17 61 a2 65 419 19 65 a2 67 13 19 52.0 8 5 |7t 014 20 82 0 7 al7s 918 2 52 0 8 ta)7a g13 20 70 a3 a |77 1622 S208 4 |s0 e172 82 65 a [se o17 23 82 0 4 far o17 22 52 alas 018 23 52 alas o 19 2 52 afar oi 2 a2 a [ee p10 23 52 2 98 922 26 82 92 9 19 25 82 98 92 26 82 hos @ 23 27 82 hoe 9 26 26 52 hin2 9 25 29 52 hve 9 26 30 52 hos 9 2428.52 104 hos. fis 9 25 90 52 hie g 26 3 52 2s g 28 32 8.2 3 3 2 2 |n2 2 2 1 1 1 21 [126 029 32 52 a Sine e271 Bz ° © 1 (127 9 20 32 52 a 1/130 6 30 33 52 a 1/34 931 33 52 a ov ia7e 92 94 82 ° 01 143 0% 95 52 3 ot ia7 935 36 5 ° 21/60 9 36 36 5 et hiss 136 36s 20 j160 i 37 38 5, 20 [163 i 38 35 5, so hey 1 36 36 52 D1) 2 6266/67 gis 526 a [85 0 - 10 512 2 52°66 |70 9 14 2052 © 7 \87 0 oe 013 4 52 65/73 918 21 82 0 6 [70 6 28 2142552 64/78 918 22-52 06 [75 9 os 15 25 52 0 3 [ea o17 29 62 0 4/80 9 28 916 27 52 0 3 [e7 p19 29 2 « 4 [84 o os 018 2952 62/93 92025 52 6 3/20 9 oe 9191 52 62 |99 922 26 52 03 |a5 o o3 02) 33 52 0206 9 2 28 52 6 2 hos @ 23 022.35 52 0 1 [115 9 26 90 82 6 2 [tt o 22 921 325206 2 107 928 27°52)'9 2109 9 o3 92238 52 61 (13 9 26 29 52 6 2 hog 22 02495 52 6 1 \119 9 27 90.62 6 218 6 02 28.97 52 0 1|aeg 291 $2 01 h120 0 22 $27 30 52 91 |i33 93133 82 6) jae on $26 96 52 6 1 fin (33 3¢ 5200 1 37 o on fas 3062 01 fis 3239 52 0 1 lise g oa 02697 52 61/27 99031 52 0 1 azo o2 {28 28 62 61 (19a 092 92 52 61 fize on i 27 36 62 ¢ 1 (39 999 93 52 01 hae @ on 126 35 52 0 1 fa 1 3 52 ot fio ot information see notes preceding Table 1 2Deck: RE-ENTRANT Table 26 BEAM DATA SLAB DATA Tintern ears Fie resistance somins eEReaTER F Unitorm toed Sib dopth 130mm a enanee Beam spacing 30m] | Concrete nw ; See ‘Steel strength $355 ‘Strength (28/30 : : ‘Shear connectors: Hilti (cylinder/cube) ay E oa! height rorer ona | permanence ae SAGE 28 a 5 rae $ sales Ties fae ah Pag es 20 33 100 For further information e00 notes preceding Table 1Deck: RE-ENTRANT Table 27 BEAM DATA, SLAB DATA internal bear Fire rasistance 30 mins SEE Uniform load ‘Sab depth 120 mm welts) Beam spacing 3,0.m Concrete Ww : ‘Stool strength 3275 Strength 25/30 AE ‘Shear connectors (eylinderreube) oN 2 60 25. 28 [eos 6099/5649 be ao 28 |e 910 21 64 g 10/58 6 9 16 87 ao 99 |s7 om 2 67 gi|61 69 15 60 a9 910/69 11 22 69 g 12/62 49 14) 8114 10 ‘ O11 /74 932 23 746 912/68 G10 14 88 6 10 4 oa |e 913 4 52 0 4|78 g 18 2) 52 06 |72 917 18 52 07 o10|74 a32 29.73 4i2[6s 49 14 94 ci0lse as 9 58 a8 212/77 413 2 77 412/68 410 14 67 d 1062 49 10 61 a8 ot2ieo a2 79 aia{71 a0) 18 720 41/64 49.10 63 a0 ea fos 91 252 64 (80 917 23 52 0 5 o6 22 [a7 915 27 52 63 84 917 23 52 0 4 as 205416549 e 3 [84 915 26 52 03 |s1 g17 2 52 ¢ 5 6 +24 2/88 916 27 52 0 3 |a5 918 23 52 6 & os xed 2/93 917 20 52 © 3 [a0 919 2 52 «4 [86 g2t 21 52 0 4 50012739 ots|e2 aia 22s eta{7t g10 14.71 440/65 48 9 64 ao x39} oi a7 o 14 25 87 dt4[77 11 1 78 912/70 410 10 69 410 asont7tn 45 £2 [84 937 28 52 09/91 9 20 28 52 « 3 [84 19 18 52 0 4 xy £2 [a9 9 18 29 52 02/95 921 25 52 6 3 |90 ¢21 20 52 0 4 xs © 2/102 919 90 62 02 (98 g 22 2 52 63/95 923 2 52 03 xe7 © 1 (toe 9 20 22 £2 e 2 fos g 73 27 62 © 2 |tor g 25 26 52 2 3 oon 3 a 15/92 41425 97 414/90 812-18 90 412/73 @ 10 10 72 6 10 asl £2 i029 19 31 62 02 |98 271 20.52 03 |90 19 8 52.03 4000178 54 St ioe 920 22 62 © 2 toa g 23 27 82 6 2 [97 c22 21 52 6 3 re oi ing gat a2 s2 02 foe g 2 2 52 © 2 2 e222 82 0 3 xo ct ine g 22 36 62 61 [nz g 25 29 62 «2 |08 427 25 52 02 x ct (i2t 929 95 62 61 fine g 26 30 52 6 2 [ita a 28 25 52 0 2 asraas2n o 1 ina 921 96 52.6 2 fos © 9298 02-2052 63 et fing 022 95 52 61 [14 9 ©2108 024 22.52 22 01/123 923 36 52 et o e212 627 28 62 e 2 ot fiz7 9237 s2 61 |r2s 9 et ite ¢ 20 26 52 02 21/31 925 38 52 6 1 [126 9 e120 420 26 52 02 @ 1/6923 36 52 61 |e 0 @2jnz c 2? 24 52 02 21/36 927 39 52 6 1 [130 0 et iizs 230 26 52 0 2 © 140 927 39 52 61 [ise o st figs a 33 29 52 21 efa3 9284052 61 ev fze aaa oz et ei fae 29 a 52 61 has Si 9s as 2 52 61 eo fs1 i 20 40.52 01 hare 1 is a5 29 52 04 cosa i 29 9952 61 500 St fia ce 3 52 61 Sofie (2 98 52 61 t55 i st fiso 40 a2 52 01 102205101 $0 ise 1 20 99 52 0 1 |t57 4 etfs ce 20 52 61 mar} fo jiez +20 8 62 6 060 1 97 26 52 6 1 [t53 c 38 90 52 0 1 m125f So fies i 28 97 $2 0 0 (69 1 2635 52 6 1 eo ca a2 52 01 aol so ies i 28 36 52 0 0 ah 1 ‘2oa200« 40] 7.1 9 10 24 62 6 nm S59 15 17 52 6 10 x5o74 ¢ 10 26 62 6 4/72 912 23 52 0 5 © 7 j67 18 17 52 0 9 xeo]77 p11 27 82 6478 919 24 52 0 8 26 [70016 8 52 28 s7faa 032 20 52 «3 |ar oie 25 52 04 es [7s 017 19 52 0 6 xaos 019 2052 ¢5|86 915 252 3 a4 os asaaser rsa g 14 31 52 02/91 916 27 52 © 3 oa os ragfiog 9 1S 33.62 «2 |97 9 18 29 52 62 |93 92025 52 63 a4 mo7pios 916 34 52 4 2 [103 9 19 31 52 02 |99 g 22 26 52 0 9 o3 magia 918 87 82 e 1 (1.1 921 39 52 © 2 08 g 24 28 62 02 o3 mepfiaa 9 19 40 52 © 1 [120 9 22 35 52 6 1 |1n8 g 2630 52 02 [it g 28 26 $2 0 2 aosraoms7fits 9 18 96 52 01 |ia g 2 sz 52 0 2 ho7 g2427 s2 © 2/109 026 23 52 « 3 miiafiz2 9 20 ae 52 0 1 [18 9 22 94 52 01 113 g 26 20 52 6 2109 g 28 25 52 0 2 miavpiae 9 21 40 £2 6 1 [iad 9 24 35 52 4 1 [19g 27 90 52 62 [118 g 20 28 52 0 2 missfiag faz 41 62 61 [90 9 25 37 52 6 1 [ize 9 2931 52 6 1 12093 27 52 0 2 magia i219 52 © 1 fie t 27 a8 sz 61 |133 93133 52 0 1 29 9 26 29 52 6 1 fasojias | 20.37 52 0 1 (a2 i 26 36.82 6 4 frat 133 38 52 03 [tay g 96 30 52 0 1 pasgjiae | 202 G2 6 0 ita7 1252 52 01 (ras 132 33 82 0 1f44 g a8 a 52 ot seonseentzafiag 4 22 40 $2 0 1 [132 9 26 97 62 e 1 fz7 9 3031 52 0 1 haz gs 27 82 0 2 Missfine i 22 09 52 0 1 hae +28 a S26 1 13 9 32 32 52 61 lize 9 34 28 52 ot Uinfiaz i 22 37 2 0 1 a2 i a7 oe 82 6 1 (ize gaa a2 52 03 faa g 36 79 52 01 mohae 121 96 52 et fas 126 98 62 et [ing 134 38 62 6 1 [139 9 37 30 52 ot For further Information see notes preceding Table 1. 14Deck: RE-ENTRANT Table 28 BEAM DATA SLAB DATA [Internal bears {Fire resietance SEER =F Uniform load Slab depth 130 mm| ea Me Beam spacing 3.0m Concrete Nw : Bate Steel strength 3355, Strength Vos Shear connectors Hi a\ fe hight TRESS LORD wnt E 4s [ 20 28. DESIGNATION | BEF OF Ds _te oe] UF br os Eb or ts TE oe] re 160 [ao o 2/39 94 1 nse wo [eso 4 [44g 5 17 44g 5/439 6 16 435 Slazg 6 ue a2e 7 200 fs 9 5 |s0 06 19 S0:9 8/499 7.971469 8) 489 816 45 9°10] 220 [57 9 6 |se 7 21 539 8/555 8 19 829 10/539 9 17 80611 240 [oa 9 Sle2 a8 22.520 6/61 9 e270 52:8 8) 50.9 11 18 52/6 10] 2 |72 9 6 |70 08 25 ci 8/689 1 2 61 6 11/67 9 13 20 61 6 13 300. |e 5 8 [79 g11 2 orae ti finy gp rgaenga a 14) 2a ° 320 [90 9 M1 [ae 913 30 83 6 15/85 9 18 27 81 9 17/89 g ° hoo 9 is |37 9 18 3293 9517] 9419-17 205-099 20) 91% ° hit @ 18 36 108 9 10 31 102 9 hz 9 81940 S ne gael ase coyotes fost s fos o22 3 > [131 9 26 38 127 9 ‘ char ta ae Scrap 29 ares eds A ia “hiss t 30 40 ahses 42 os 6 ae 400g 8 as a o5 8 450 7/476 469.7 15 42 9 10 58 2620 519 9/539 B29 8.17 48g 62 97 2 585 10/596 589 10 18 S49 19] 70. 99°28 65.91] 876 65 9:12 20:61 9)7% 78 on 749 Wawa. - 8 ora lot betg en eee 3.3 sis - : -|eeo ag we 300. fro.2 p18 a2 cae 93 p20 202 220 foo 0175 - - - [1099 wou za - - 300. fixe pws Sl tee 10.6 923 280 2) 360 fiz 019 28 thins 9 112 9 25 20 400. fra re s269 N23 928 S20 cos 450 fia Toa a n60 9 136 9 32 34 s00 fis Faget i804 Cree eae 550 fis i 2237 i574 15.6 | 35 35 e00_fre.7 122 isi res ise ae iS For further information see notes preceding Table 1 15Deck: RE-ENTRANT Table 29 (BEAM DATA. SLAB DATA tra bea [ve estance 96 ins EES Shots pot ond Seo doh tao Veo Ste erenath sass | | conse MESES Shen comeetore Seen SEEN TE canate ES ae LENE LL = maximum spacing of beams ro tm Tae om Toa te as | oo [os | as [as | oo [os | as | as | oo | os Designation whet ep ape wpe wpe wpe pe NEBL Dw ] | © 254c102% 25 “a a4] 40 na . iF ol alsa oa Se se 200140031 86 es x3 x49} ag 43 nad o82)63 94d] 56 4a 406317854 10 es oe xr) rae eae tas col <5 asnaisan 62] 154 ea 118 02) on re eee]. 84 118 0 89| 100 ol 7] asrn19%1 67] 189 c48 0 cae] 18:4 4819.1 84 62] 105 62] 15064 fi] 2 5 cle cael zt eas) = 190 ci ea rages = = ed) 135 84174 09 : 2s }190 eae ce] 144 8a] 188 09 s10a20%101 ale 7 254] 15.8 a] 200 ce a9] 284/165 8d oaaeax ae] 68 02] 5 o7) x52] 0.0 9244 61 934] x00) 75 929] 7.0 633] fe] 21 g 36] 10.3 24 2sanabn 72) 124 cad 1058 20 Shoal tao cael int cad] eae] 121 eae] 180 e54 129 282/104 n40] 88 n36| 10.4 oa) had 69 naz 051208% 97] 17.9 cel 154 «40 tne c82] 96 c2| 83 252] 104 959 ne mare - = - 1706 el a3 662 12 o00|308 42] am m9 182 c64 126 a9 09] 120 062] 9 ns m5 | 17a et 4 168 ce a8 60] 088 x99] <> |e esa 484 €60)1058 00] 3.1 naa] 108 naz 24g] ; wo] naa] 124 naz 86x3600120] wae ia ston od tan coa]tos ca 08 ced 7153] 133 ©8417. 662,148 €60 12.1 60] 109 HSB nr] 8 esal et c82| 194 60] 188 60139 262] 1.5 HB na : Ll pe Sha esa 129 ¢60)160 ©6129 150 For further information see notes preceding Table 1 16Deck: RE-ENTRANT Table 30 BEAM DATA SLAB DATA ‘ternal bear Fire resistence 30 mins = Single point load Slab depth 130 mm Steel strength 8.956 | | Concrete Nw F connectors Welded SEI awn 25130 EE) ZEESy Ee L = maximum spacing of beams Tam om m_| as | 45 | 60 | 5 WNP wp we 2 S| [oesickaion | Carve = 2011935 29 25ert02x 2] x2q 254x146] xa x4 £33) 0 220] 48 oq a0se127% 7] 6829] 62 +2 xaa| 70 292] 79 cal xa 2 «4 20550654 80 e 58 932] 53 938 49 peal 86 996) 61 944 se cual 45 02 43:92 as0<127 9) 60 24 x39 79 3) 356e1715 45] 24 cay 4062140539 31 a) 45731824 89 29] 9.3240 cer x69] asl rae ese 254 ee x00] 175 40] 199 cas) sual ye ese eed ea 27185 aa] 169 cg ae i23 664 ad 202 Scio sa eas peirreey es4l103 621 84 262 xaq 1039 ea £54 143 058 ee 129 e641 ea x04 18 £86 165 o58 el 139 o62) 123 eee ‘5202108 a) 18-88 139264 120 ee xaq ese] 7 286 WA cou 154 oe ce moi] = +|179 284 150 e841 129 e84{ 160 c62| 140 oe Ot cae or 180 e64 160 e86129 <4] 1700 6a 149 oa] 09 202 ma { EES 19 +62 te ce nn9 a2 60x220n101 ; a £6 60 c62| t16 062 25] 1928 ced ras 662 xq a9 934 a x09 116 ca Co ae nas 07] 124 c46) 11.3 cae] 98 46] 105 940] 98 940l 06 ce) 75 ose] 5a nae mal 16.1 648] 135 ct] 11.8 40] 19.9 ge 129 eal 10a cod a8 os oa nae m6] 193 eae 6.8 ce] t44 c 4817.0 g 2 soa he 78 nao 20512085 97 45 eae] 123 40] 105 00] 120-0 aoe sane x19] 169 c40]140 4s] 120 o46| 14 Ba 23¢ 7328 104 ©4126 950] 11.2 ca] ey nay 180 640] 10.0 24s] 138 eal 364 wise] | = /sa cael ee cael ane: 11.9 oe 146 0621128 ena] 108 c62] 93 nex wie = : = |1944 cag the os} 173 he0 mao] = = 5 : 78 26a) a3 nee wep || Toes ane 184 n52 ni aq 200 248] 69 « aa] 148 cael 13.2 ose Bee xs 138 8] 200 68 cea) s28 oo to ce2 xn =| 1944 4a 2000 «tel 169 oe] 148 oa ta cer xa0a] 190 e464 064 va 660 For further information see notes preceding Table 1.Deck: RE-ENTRANT Table 31 BEAM DATA SLAB DATA Taternal bearh Fire resistance 0 mins Single point load Slab depth 120 mm Steel strength 275 | | Concre LW ‘Shear connectors Welded diameter ESnecwe zs | as | as | 60 | TNT NTL NTL OW | 40 230) 46 934 4 03 A cad] 54 940) 49 cad a1 cad 2058127437 4s x42] 81 449] 70 242) 59 44] 50 xq Bs 42 €50) 45 #94] 48 04s} soscr05x 40} 7. 8 a2] a8 6 42] 40 4 rae| 29 cae] 76 cao] oa cad) oo 43 cae) 53 caal as cat} x4] 95 60 fe €62| 80 64] 61 c84 43 cH anexr77% 3) “a xy 63 262] 62 063) S4 08a] 44 et 40641404 39 ss * x46l os - 406017854 Da o82 cn asraasze 89 2 ead as c2 * as 5 eo Pepeey x6) 24 7a es Se coo x7 28 75 ea 60 ceo zal oa ca] 135 e Be as cor xq ts e484 02 28 eu 89 260 xo V7.8 eae 146 cael 1285 esl 156 C8 28 es 2a cue san2t0x 07] 178 cat} 145 cae wes ced 94 84 ery x9q oe ca8| 10. eae] 138 oc] 17.1 1 282104 682 Bt e00 not wee li7 eael ras eel ant esa 163 8412.9 oa] 109 esa] 41 cao] as co 109] ft e488 a6] 19.3 4] 68 oa 136 ee] 116 c 84 130 09 an oe za] | 2s fs =a eae tea chal s6.7 e6¢] 129 04] 8.8 00] 10.1 062 s10a20x101 195 cae 1638 eae v7 cod 128 c64)t61 o62| 199 62 98 660 a9] tra e48 806 184 c64]173 60] 149 09 toe 60 nag} [90 esd 16.1 82 3 50) 126 660 ‘05208 46] Ea 34] 6a eae] a9 cal 41 cal = x52 08 999] 61 od] 83 46) 45 cas] 41 02] Reo] 78 949] €2 cae] 6 c44| 42 cas] 40 930 44 9 X7i[ aa eae] 26 c46| 64 est] 4 cae] 59 ga] 84 9 wee] s0.1 cas] a8 cue] 73 46] 63 se oa) 2sax2s4n 72) 10.3 €46) 89 cat] 74 cA 6 bs e8y * Teas] ee] 10-1 cat) a4 cas] 71 cad 00 es 7 c82| ceo] 4 nse Shov]3s cael tne c48) 96 cae] 83 cas] 04 ese! 80 cA] 23 260) 71 coo] 59 cod 49 nae tisa) 193 cae] 140 c48) 16 40] 99 onal 124 c54 106 c9] 33 ceo] as cea] 70 coq 58 nee sie7|200 cael 172 e454: a8] 123 4a] 5.0 cl 10.0 653 tra ceo] 10.3 60] 88 cen 7. 56 g0sa08% 97] 148 €46| 125 e 46] 104 cas) 89 ase a0 e ceo) 54 260 Sritef te cael 14 oas|119 ea 101 oad] 120 e52]109 6 sop e 60] 63 260 137] 194 a4] 108 cas 126 cd] 108 eae] 145 54] 120 c84) ae 60] 70 062 Mise] = [88 eae] 1885 eae] a3.3 c46| 164 c3414.1 C54 12961 00] 79 200 x 7 19. eae 64 ¢ [ira ese the c80|138 62] 12 660] 96 60 ral teecal pe e145 060 ma] e =e oy cod og 126 060 sera6ex75 174 646] 4 240] 23 0 6 a1 od 23 68 $60 73 260 x53] tee cael taa cael 70 ct tet e82] 126 64] 108 c5a{ 138 ced] 1.9 60] 82 ce] B4 C60 wan 41 e616. «ae 17a ced) tas ose 129 c54)186 c60) 128 ceo) 31.3 662] 88 cB 78 For further information see notes preceding Table 1Deck: RE-ENTRANT Table 32 BEAM DATA SLAB DATA Tnternal beam Fire resistance ‘90 mins > Fi Sirale point lod Slab dopth 130 mm way ‘Steel strength 8275 | | Concrete Nw pebesis : ‘Shear connectors Welded | Strength 28/30 nS) E * (cylinder/cube) A & L = maximum spacing of beams eam Sean] oon Tam T aia Jicapwime | as | as | eo | 75 | a5 | os | oo | os | as | as | oo | os waive mtn Ot te fe fn “i TT TS 20335529) 2steteoe an} 4a x7] 63 234] 40 24) soso] 240] 45 cao] an 220] 49 094 | x33) 43 224] 40 20 sosetz7s a7] 5 54] 44 234 | xaos 639 49 cao) ae 43 en | xa] 75 44) 55 cail 63 229] 53 959 48 oaal 41 cad] 30501685 40} 69 £3q) 48 c36| 48 30] 48 29] 40 coe 6x12 39] 54 230] 43 30 x39) 63 239) 49 e34] 4a <3 asonirix as] 83 c42 68 42] 64 42] 41 240) 46 294) as cay x31] 96 e486. 048) 79 o46| $8 48) 54 240] 50 046] 49 cae] x57] 108 40 68 cae] 75 82] 8.1 660] 80 248) 56 c82 a6 c50] 40 60 xe] 21 48) 78 ca] 84 64] 68 68 62] 88 ceal ae coz aos 40% 39] 78 £38) $6 935] 48 ae) 40" 634 | sacl os cad os 242] 64 cad 48 oad] 49 soni 7ex ca] 14. as co) 84 esd] 63 4a ca x60 121 « 49] 106 <4] ou ere] 89 e647 a6 one x67]133 49] 116 c4| 9.9 248) 9.4 040/101 54] 8a 286] 64 et] 80 sa 262 x14] 144 46] 126 €48| 106 c49) 91 040] 11.0 054] 98 e670 cet] a8 55 60 asyetsaxs2] 11.9 946] 10 648) 9 aa] 7 cael ay a0] 78 £49) 6 aa e013. eae] 45 049] 98 c46) 83 ee 100 wae] a e546 cee] an x67] 164-40] 126 cag] 08 cas 911 644110 200] 96 64] 8x 86] 70 c¥Ml 78 x 7A) 69:40] 19.4 eas] 119 e495 245 8 BS 64] 74 ed 39. x02] 165 49] 144 e812. 248) 10.4 49] 126 ¢ 9 54] 80 65100 v4 cas] 24 aa 54] 83 84108 ta ca 00 eae ros o54] 9.1 684115 coq 7a ee 83822104 62] 10,9 24 1655 « 49] 13.9 4, 105 684] 90 504] 1.3% ae xox]. | aa eal 164 24) se 1.6 284] 100 etal 12s ca] 79 ce soif = = Jia cat] 1 eae 123 68103 cud 1a. eed a3 ce 109} ; 120-684 14 esata ml a0 cer sip} Hai cba 2 ce] th on 202 a12g| ~ S| r98 eae 194 658 16:3 054] 140 «al 174 9 n0 eee a9] 155 656105 02] 16. «64,140 6a] 121 coz 20842035 29 230) «5 wad) a0 920] ae 234] 49 940) 45 aq x0] 238] 65 944] 49 24s] 40 929 x eae] 6.0 cae, oa x0q 2oaxzben 7 oie 73 oa aq £44 0.1 cae ceo ior] 128 cas] 11.1 cae] 94 cae ce wiz] 183 asl ra eas] 11.3 ca ee 2083308 97] 13.6 «He 120 4} 1,1 6a] 0 ‘i10] 58 c4al 338 cal + ello. & 3 eae) cals, m2] 155 645131 ca 2 260 mise]. = [176 240] 149 el 113 e86| a es bee wie] | << s -fres ona 139 e451 eo saa] os the tos suid tat © i831 Haves +180 654/153 ‘56<368%125) ye 249] 13.8 ae Lo rer For further information se@ notes preceding Table 1 aaa micas ce 128 c64| 108 a4] 93 62 143. 62120 o62| 10.4 42 79Deck: RE-ENTRANT Table 33 SLAB DATA Fire resistance SO mins = 5 Single point load Slab depth 130 mm qs Stool strength 8.355 | | Concrete : : | Shear connectors Welded | | Strength ee ameter amm | [{evindericube) LL = maximum spacing of beams BEAM SPAN Som Tom oom IMPOSED Unctwm | ss | 4s | eo | 2s | as | os | oo | 7s | as | as | co | 78 DESGRATON | EPCOT NT CRTC NPC WEP E WP WE WPL ONT OW we 160 300 220 |33 919] 30 014 240 | 4 530] 41 020,39 026 38 290 |e 29] 60 024 88 oud) 40 42] 40 922] 38 922]38 02033 o22 200 Jae saa] er cao oa cat 59 cae 53 590) -49 94d] 45:680) 38 928 36 920] 33 920] 20 028 320 |i09 cas] 95 eas] 00 cao) 69 cas] 73 952] 69 ese) sa esd] 260 [129 casfta eas 95 c48) a1 cae 86 84] 73) e463 ca} feo Jie aa] ize cae|t1s ca8] a2 caalt19 cd 104 cq] Be ese 7.8 ot 4350 [is eo] 7.0 ea] aa ca 129 eae] 148 84) 129 54] 108 e849. c84 800 18 48] 183 cae] 109 c54 180 ee] 134 c84)11.8 c 54 so |=: tae cae] =~ «(108 e096 salar o5p 600 : 200 - 60173 64 ‘ae ¢62/16.6 62] 195 262 HEA 100 120 40 160 200 | 40 024 38 24] 35 o2d aa 220. | $924) 54 924 49 sa 929} 240 | 79 029) 74 934 68 94 62 ‘44 920] 40 930] 34 932] 31 952 200 | to 040) 96 40] 01 249] 7.0 6 942}'51 gael aa gad a7 o32] 38 992] 38 om 300 |r49 249] 13.0 c49] 10.9 048] 24 84 e547 088) 7. 932)'69-942] 63 052] 54 052 320 [ree ea8| 148 cao] 124 c48] 108 c 46 24 eta] a1 cé4| 9. 946] 88 gst] 74 cod] 62 neo 340 aa] 1338 eae 11.9 cae 104289] 99 64) 109'9 8 Seer} 83 6a] 7.1 cer 20 tr cai] 6. ©4619. cat 118 64] 100 o 5124 c62] 10. c€2| 9.1 042] 7.9 caz woo | sa3 cae] s0 aq 198 2541191054] 148 c62) 129 262] 62 450 | saa cat 69 686 45 c4| 17.0 262] 156 662/101 oo ‘500 5 ede =] esa so. a] 18 0621356 62 380 yo9 62] 80 coz goef a ah egress wee 100 120 M0 180 39 924) 38 92434 0 200 58 024] 6.1 92648 a5 92 oa 220 78 920] 70 930) 68 es} a0 230 3 432} 30.039] 20 423 caa| 109 46) 0 © re 50 93 sone 300 fos eae 138 eae] 119 e465 143 o 125.0 64] 99 940) 9.1909] an nea 320 te cae 2 eae] 124 cae] ea oa] 129 c54 11.8 66 10.1 84] 120 984 110 e462] 9.9 62] 79 N60 nwo | > = toa cael tae cao] 70 eel is e860] t20\ 6d] 1.1 084] 138 e862 127 e910 cna] an cer 380 a9 e443 cae] 9.4 Be] 100 e149 656/123 eH] 36.1 062] 123 c4al 11.1 c62] 98 62 400 1 LIMP ES Ios Gia) 2/290 89] 16.0 e848 e478 cal ane ce] 1ay ce2 11.4 62 40 y75 08 aa c62/ 18. 62] 136 c62 00 Re Z SEES [1a e669 62 550 E z Wes 62 600, L passes : 80 For further information see notes preceding Table 1Deck: RE-ENTRANT Table 34 BEAM DATA SLAB DATA Tarra bean Fre rtanae ——— mae Ses Shue poe fad St cept 130mm alee Sta sont s2ss | | concen Se : ‘Shear connectors Weided ‘Strength “ EE ces ed ES {= masini pacing of bome as | eo | 75 | a5 | as | oo | 25 | as | as 2s Seat pnp gew pew ew an eat na 7 | 1 a3 | goo hase] ea: Lad ap cag 4a: ead] ea:cayca:4al] an eal aa ax aaa fo [ha sail na com aa cao Go caa] en tune | st fata eoy]at sate fad as cod go cua sooi)anisial essed noice sud tasted ana suceubansigkansaderseal ss sto: | t4agaa saa sansa on oaa nice acc yed t-te oe Sealey var-49:ssatearoul Steer too [13a inn canna cates econg cad in ced ee seer foo: 2 tax bal asa tat caheeseg acl ese jaltase ey ino tales sadist cudien seduce cal tennis ene 1 2 Jae doo | a2 oto] 30 o24 as of 23 cod dan: | sacaael co. aad an cele See] anand a god angel nee faac|iatstce| sa ca eh el cus aad eacekeaeed ta-enineaiseentad et x io [Ss | o3 ca 30 exe eo cad sh cag'es cod Se eed an cud ee bal ot So:lness Suq.7a oud aot eel ate] coccel Be fee Std 03 cud to ced co cud te coos cel so ftaaea fa] cul se std en-au aa) eel sasee iooz] asl feline ence % Sea] ich cane eee ne oo sea inacuucs oe tse tees eculsieraa setabind if Seas acerca Sea ishise Ji uve anon nase Jaou| passe gaiead easel palanael = see saaiacal ied Rosas those et fee talas ca toate rare 3s fp calico ca cel casaes celes ce 3 {25 Satins sao oa casa ced cor ced ase ec pansanjaaiie eneebeuseainuecl eure celts sansa sonmlaanan celao-e metal Bae eer pbs 4 Slisasaed panel tase saan For further information see notes preceding Table 1 81Dec! RE-ENTRANT Table 35 BEAM DATA SLAB DATA internal bearh Fie resistance ‘30 mins Fi Two point loads ‘Slab depth 120mm ‘Stoel strength 8.365 Shear connectors diameter aL L = maximum spacing of beams Tas oom oo — POSED LOAD EN as | 4s | 60 foesienaTiOn 208812929 286x102 25 santana] x37 x4 20812727 asext27« 29 x29} aex171% 4 4ooct40x 3 2080 -ap7s052 69 x7 xe asmr9% 67 xa9l x0q sonczt0x 82 x94 s10az0x101 a3] m24f [sa 4a - {36 ats 43 asd a3 8 G42 124 642108 449 124 aaa} tos 24 136 aad s18 ta aed 123 4 153 4d 130 6 uae 170 442) 45.4 peers! “| i74 aaa{ 50 o4a] 7.8 as] te 194 daa] s0.5 642] 108 452| 108 os 123 a ‘poaa20a ag 083206 97 a 29 2289} 561260129 a7 as 08 sas 93 Me 4s 9 n16 oa ‘| 53 140) 123 4a 40} 69 49] 165 60 40} 28,49] 200 44 4a} 8 149] 4 4a} 96. +49 Gate tae 80 gad For further information see notes preceding Table 1. es saa too saa iyt god ine geo tae von vom oan] 03 20) 90140] 08 ta 7.4 600Deck: RE-ENTRANT Table 36 BEAM DATA ‘SLAB DATA Internal beam Fire resistance TO ming TEST Fi Two point loads ‘Slab depth, 130 mm coals Stoel strength 35s | | Concrete Nw es Shear connectors welded | | stengen 25130 EEE diameter (eylinder/oubo) = maximum epacing of beams finroseo T i toaownine | 3.5 m_| as | 5 | oo | os | a6 | as | oo DESIGNATION [CW TORT WT NT NP EW wy er 0e | aoa 2bax102x 2 2540146 2) 23 2osnt27« 27 X4a| 48 230] 44 620] 40 o 30501685 40] 41 924 I x54] 55 999 61 920 48 oq] 44 034 as6e127% 39) f x3q ‘5enr71< a8] 5 25 a xo 08 fa aay 039] 40 939) 406x1406 39) 45 229 45 «39 eae] 5 23m 51 4. 400317859) 33, 442 8.6 440] 50 932] 46 922] 42 00d x69] 9 242 0 dei] 58 939] 64 920] 49 042] 44 94a serei5ax 62] 72-229] 442 60 64 x60] sa aal ees x67] 190 420] aa2) 74 a x74] 139 99d 442 79 daa a2) 43 42] 43 24a] a1 0 az} 126 5 42) 08 94 40 42] 40 04g 48.982 a57e10% 67] 14.08 aa] Be 442 74 a. nad) 48 p40) 41 940) x74 20 34 94 4a] an oa) 14s a2 128 42] 108 042] 91 daa 301210 62] 150/442 13.6 4491135 eal 99 447 x21 $83 oai]ra0 oad] 0 daa mo 160 ad ta eat] 18 oa i 2122} =|19.0 #47] 180 4 42] 13.8 642 11 14] sroxzzon104 tose thao 133 fos sa sal 2} aialtss aaa naa4 702120 x2 x8 sear ae gan 44 a30| 40 e29 3] 82 ¢39) sa 920] 40 sa m6 4 ¢29 22 894] 68 34] 60 036] 54 038] 41 142] 4 vay 20819081 9) a 620 5 999 81 099 aoa] 49 4 108 024 6] 62 930] 2 650] 61 93¢] ay ta i m3) 24 034 234 73 a5d 8.036] 62 aaopen Vaz] 40 | 4, neq a 638 ton 24d 81 93 na a3 74 958] 09 ga 63 laa) 4) Val mod 3 940] 194 642 186 93108 G3ef 85 934] 86 eae] 6x 12] 63 sag gape ef 463 aa 144 130] 31 935118 956] 108 gaa] 28 Iau 73. aa wa OY ah 442 se 136] 780 930] 160 ¢2e| 28 gad] 0. a3] 84. saa 966360120] 15.4 a2 138 0-3 m7] 1.4 gal 155 e423. 442] 13.1 93120 93] 106 942] 98 980] 7.2 142) 70 143 2203 176 442] 16.1 442] 14.8 931386 936124 9a 100 989] v0 142] 70142 For further information 660 notes preceding Table 1Deck: RE-ENTRANT Table 37 BEAM DATA SLAB DATA Internal bears Fie resistance ‘BO rine ‘Two point loads Slab depth 120 mm ye nes Stoo! strongth 8.275 | | Concrete ww : sige Shear connectors ‘Stes 25130 \PBeey Fe diameter ieyinder/oubo) ces i ae LL = maximum spacing of beams 2oaer3 29 x24 ayacrass 3 2061279 | x42] 40 422) 40 224] 40 938 x49] 49 220] 40 020] 48 aaa] soseresx aa] 48 036) 48 934) 41 240] as0x1274 39 x39) 4.1 «29 asoxr7ixa5] 60 +32} 41 a x5y 42 44 442] 45 020) 43 904 25 a2) 46 daa] 6.3 26] 48 94a 4 asa] x9) au] 63 a0 4064140439 cao] 40 2 x4gl a2 a5 00) ‘406817 54 4a] 43 se x6) 4a) 53 64d 4s 230) 44 oat} ssrers2x 52 a) 63 saa 2 oe] 90 4 “ 4s a 8 73 ae oa toa a 0s 4 xe2|r20 ‘s7n1911 67] 104 442 sanaroxe2} 30 4] 109) 174 342 eron220r103] 188 «2 13 a7 aira}200 a2} 21 a x24 tea aaa] 95) 049] 193 34a tos a4) poaz0ex 46 xs x69} xn] 43 929 x09] 5.1 929 3107] 09 439] ao] 68 64a] 51 93d se 167] 139 442) aa] 95 642] 0 934 78 140) 43.9 2081208 97] 9.8 442 440) 60 442] 6 938) 89 Riar]ias ead] sr aad] 94 c42| 00 dao] at gud 09 aed 0.9 4 Zrsel so sad s30 daa] so.8 ea] 9.1 gaz tos gae] a4 8a] 28 459 Kise] tee aad veo aaa] ra.9 daa] tha gaz ta. 52] 118 48a] 28 gi rasa] [ve geal 60 aaa] 19.8 44a] 60 32] 138 a 114 3 tao) ral = | dado aa $6.1 52] 128 20] 108 ia] ‘asena6en129] 136 442 fos saa] a4 ea] 20 482] 85 482] 70 650] 60 650) 1 ‘ia 163 2} tis e40) 90 442] 11.6 452100 a8a] a asa] 7.1 82] 74 140] 72 89 “oofns aed] tao gaz] 99 642] tna a0) 433 442] s13 82] 98 Js2] a1 e826 ia) 9.x 140] 7.3 Taal Sia aaa| so aa] ta9 oa) 0 402129 680] 08 asa] 941 esol 93 140] 9.0 140) For further information see notes preceding Table 1Deck: RE-ENTRANT Table 38 BEAM DATA ‘SLAB DATA Taternal bears Fira resistance ‘30 Tins Two point loads Slab depth 130 mm Steal strength 8275 | | Concrete Nw ‘Shear connectors Weided | | Strangth 25/30 diam: ia9mm_} | {eylinder/cube) eV Te — ——— rs_| as | as | oo | rs | a8 | os | oo | a8 etn Ne eau SPAN ter ve = zoaetssx 9) 2saxi02x 2] 250414013) x3 x4q s05e102x 25 208812727 xq | soxt27 39) x39 x00| 90 40] 71 649 60 aad] 5.1 242] 60 432] 48 440] 44 940] 40 08 | | s06e140% 3 xaq x67] a9 442] 72 44a] es 042) 56 vad] us aan] 6s aad 60 o82| <3 400 x74) 5 aaa] 94 daa 71 sad 61 480) 5:3 682] 48 480] 40 439] 40 vag) svete] aa x sa] 44 620] 44 239) 44 a} xo) sa 50 vd 50 aud 46 a x 3a Bi eae) 6 xaq 571914 67 sanczi0x 0 m0 442] 93 4 es ie 4 68 as2| 56 4 0 4s 60-6 x9} 1233 642] 103 349 As sal 78 a may 323 442] 09 4 34 45d 78 33 og} 3.8 gaa 15 4. 99 472 4 04 x23] 183 4.42] 129 44a] 3341 19 43a] 93 an 10322810) v4 442] 124 442] 108 108 a5 89 asa] ma $32 4a2| 16. 642 338 482 118 482] 100 205203% 46 zi x5 x2] x06] 43 93 40.0 250284% 73] 51 939 48 930 4 53 88 642) 59 a4] s-y3H 61 938 489 79 @ 84 G40 9.6 p40] 50 352] 41 14] ‘anal 4 | b4 gad 74 ae2| 64 otal 5a a2] 6 ‘ ras 32 tae aed 90 axa 78 30] 84 (2| as 3a 129 ded) 100 ad] 26 982] 75 143] 165 44 40 wed 319 aa 103 40a no. ia] 80 482) 08 a62 58 450] 50 142] | 120 asa 10. a2 8 452) 00 142] 7a 0 ase se a ee gS For further information see notes preceding Table 7 85Deck: RE-ENTRANT Table 39 pone coe [internal beam [F 90 mins Fy PR pete 2580 ge) FESed ES L = maximum spacing of beams Seam am Tm Bm T a] eee | as | as | oo | ra | as | as | oo | 5 | ss | as | oo | 25 ery Hf ito 20 zee aa 07|28 024 eo | 78 920] 29 oe] sl a1 93d 38 034] 94 04 foo [roo aad nr 0] x0 oa 4 Soe se sa1] et gam aa gay] a8 so finn aafrra ol ne oo Soe a1 gaa 70 ona 00 a] sei S00 [tea sea]tea oa m0 a. ths nas[t0a oad oe cea] 24 aq] 2a oad seo [oo aaa{sna oad as @ ee asa{taa eaaltos ava] on ial 90 ie tis suas aud no duo ri oodles wed rs 7 ' | ato |.as oo 44 6 . amo Jeo a2] 50 © a g29 38 224 a00 | >a: 020] r+ 3 to o22| 48 a2q toa a Ga 6a 02 Ania 3e0 Jase gaa] tas to Go| 0 09 so 1a foo [ra asa[tes ead] 20 aad 109 ded t00 939 eect Soo | 2] SINS Sia) seo tao ase] sae tas asa] ras {sia a to ne oa tee on oa daa taa eon fe ciehel| sed iL Perrireereiears| MB 100 te eo 20 zo 239 i ee o29 30 oa zo ae 3s ta] 90043] 39 04d 20 942 Ey os 940 ae ial ae gal 3a cad a0 902 30 $3 ia] sta] ae ead] at oat eo no ead fo \aa]s3 iaa| 4 pad] 49 eat end] acc ee 36 14a] 28 1a} 20 9a 63 ea = as cal Teh va on heal a pad 0 ose tof. 7 {e-ced| toe sua tat faa a] nea] 103 660 on sresersles iao-eea| so aa] ja See or further information see notes preceding Table 1Deck: RE-ENTRANT Table 40 SEAM DATA Stas paTA [ince bears ‘erence 30 iw SE Two pont oad Sinb depth 130mm eoubn se Stel erongth 298 | | concrete wr : we Stoorcomectors Welded |_| steng ash00 VEE a conte (efit Fees LS L = maximum spacing of beams EE = oo r — Brow | as | as | oo | os | as | os | co [os | as [ae | eo |e 7 Cay 4 salma smfena0 se lattetal sana ‘Saba separa f 2 | se vas 94 aad an aae fon] a8 tan eotor co: a4 2 a4 ig tte neal selena SOSESS S05 a5 oa 8 te te satel saemtaia soda usaebiy Heber tebete bette } } 35° aft { octaken batertehvaa shots an ead vaca apieat eet 30 [iss sets sat 09 sade aed ae oa soni easier costad peceeounted oo ena al fea asajteo ved = : fentebestcel For further information see notes precading Table 7.Dec! MEDIUM Table 41 BEAM DATA ‘SLAB DATA Taternal boar Fre resistance 90 mine = 7m Single point load Slab depth 130 mm gS as Steel strength 8.355 | | Concrete ‘Shear connectors Strength diameter [levlinderieube) 254214602] xaq sosn102x 2] x24 308127% 97] sosx165x 4] haa] 69 220] 43 932 40 naal 5a aaa] 5. gad] 48 hag asoxt27 3 nae] 43 2a 35001712 45 cu) 9 cea ss 682 60] 43 noe xsi]sa 79 ea8}103 cs) 61 ea c62 48 ni x57] te 101 648] 08 a6] 13.0 7a 682 66 <0 cea) ot m5 x6] 118 ead] 9.9 cas]28 cee 75 28 £60) 60 80 £80) 64 ext cz 69 20 6 82] 74° ca] 4oex1 40x 39 400317654 x6) 701853 ae eae] 73 ta cas] 98 00 xo $39 cae] 1.9 eae] 150 108 ¢62] 90 26d 133 xml tap cae] 128 cae] 159 Ma 282] 98 esq 125 xe 160 eat] 13.6 eae] 171 12) 65d 10.9 082] 1985 457191467] 10.6 saa calls cas] 143 cod 128 c54)105 c 64 89 052] t8 x7 461 c4@|129 eas] 6 esl 40 e54 115 ese] 98 82] 129 xa] $05 0 46|140 oat] 176 cdl 16.1 e412 ce 108 cq xq 17 eae] tes cael tea cdl t69 e854) 130 e84] 120 254 xq tae el 189 cat 200 «641371 o5e| 140 c82] 120 ese saaxzion 82] = 5 |r eae! 15.0 ee] 103.9 «5437.01 {140 c8al 180 €5 xa of =| 175 eas] 109 ote] 156 284] 133 es nop. oo] “|e oe “ie o64 sea e82]s39 ea] xro9 198 oa 174 254] 148 «tl nay : = (|i ena|es ee: s10a29x101 as 254159 os4 m9] © ‘|tais es 169 eo ‘2oax203« 46] 63 02 Ba o00) 53 930] a8 nae] x52] 70 924] 8 30] 59 938) 50 naa| 48 92 x60] 0 9.247, 83 nae] 502 om x7fas 934 30 64 nao] 99 92888 92m 8 o38] 43 nod 96]11.9 939] 109 7a nad 28 929)-79 Nae] 43. 29 2saczsie 73] 13.0 64] 89) 40 os) 79 e468 940] 01 gaa] 68 nas Ea na 29 c44}s09 949] 99 esd 00 neal ex na Ha e654) 9.1 n80) 74 nad 107|17.3 aal 148 oa e409. 9 54 nae maj 178 126 c48] 18,6 4] 195 ea 109 N50 Smad) 11.0 0 na x6}| 184 648] 19.3 a] 165 e131 N46 108 m4 10. 9 78 n32 9 a8] tat cba 12 e64| 100.c62| a8 82] 110 asa on nae 163 c54]139 o44]114 02, s28 20 7A hae 104 c64] 159 oa] 13.0 o89 no nae TCTs 069] 149 e632 «54 8 os 30 440 ‘2061208 87] 18.6 6466.0 4] 13.3 © maief == =| te e48|95.7 ways |e el isa) ft Blieaiee ener! E 109 m3 24 4 y: Steet : tag naz maf fe aad afte Mena tse ced 18 e045. 209 ery 2 cleee meedusim): [mssehsigaats 88Deck: MEDIUM Table 42 BEAM DATA SLAB DATA, Internal bears [Fire resistence 30 mine Single port load Siab depth 140mm TO Sto evenath sass | | Concrete iw ; pee: Shear connectors 25/20 ONE Strong diameter (cylinder /cube) \L = maximum spacing of beams ea tam Tom an toate | 3s | as | oo | 75 | a5 | os | oo | os | as | as | oo | os DESIGNATION WLW we we we valve mtn ain so) 2 3 2 3 -| 203139% 3) 1 1 2500146 31 3080127% 27] xa] xaal 40 039] sob68x 4] aq | 40 oa x54 #8 eae] 4a 082 a6ct27 2) x39 en1714 4] 42 gto 4a cea ay 5 e00] 4a c80 x5} 62] 63 062 noxv40x 2] : x4el “406317854 x69 x6) asreisa 0 xa s30eat0% 07 x9] xo} sxi06] xr x25] zoszoax ae) 51-02 x82] 68 p24) x60) 6.8 924, ps0254x 73]119 944) 189) 160 «49 x07] 18.3 a} waaz] 19.3 al s0scs05x97| 17.4 4a) ‘ati9[ 19.8 cl mia | aise} S| pass] asex260%029] 20, 49. e40] 49 ese ba e678 062 89 c62| 59 062 75 62 64 660 81 coal 70 ca 09) esd) Sa-ce2 74 26) oa ee as cml 70 cee 5 col 7a ce aa cal za coz 88 c62| 28 062 eee 101 54 120 va cea cedhae cofina cat For further information eee notes preceding Table 1.Deck: MEDIUM Table 43 BEAM DATA SLAB DATA Taternal boar Fire resistance ‘90 mine SESE Single point load Slab depth 130 mm Pes Steel strength | 8275 | | Concrete Ww a VETTE ‘Shear connectors Welded | | Suength 25/30 i 3 Ieyinder/oube) For further information see notes preceding Table 1. = maximum spacing of beams aaa eo T tam {SnD Nine co | 15 | a5 | as | oo | os peso ee a Gavee a ed ed asortan oo 1 254x146% 3 } <3) | ta cal aosniar3i 9 na ‘a ra Sel 8 to 4 30 46 v4 40 oa soort05c 9 | preenPeil asoniarc ae fe say Sta] se Goa] ae Sea] ao ose 2 Sta] 03 Soa] sn cog] aa ose so fale esa| ea ces] 22 ceo] #2 seo] no ceo avext40e 9 ae os soons70c te ro ose asraasac is eq to xe fe asraorcay co Seal ioo cas tea cae] 199 oa oe Teol os cae] 170 cae] 140 cae co tod es cad ina cae cat ssnea1oc 9 103 cad i90.c ad co ne] |e ceo Rofo foo oe roof 2 ne cad 30 cos coo ray : 23 ced|t04 coo sroaznioi| | m0 ca a ce] 109 ceo ea] toa castza cutee cad 328 cel 108 coo pescoacae) a x24] 20 Sea) 00 an] 42 vad Teel toe tad 49 oad asacasen | 08 a Ca te naa esfine Sa ced Ba Cte as nse thon] tes fs cad ah Stefan nse xe - 98 ca2l 89 ¢60 7,5 N60 aosiaom 3763 yo esa 4 te esa na Bots ney soa ca ey sai cal i te cad seoraeanz3 pres 39 iio eseDeck: MEDIUM Table 44 BEAM DATA SLAB DATA [internal ears [Fire resistance 30 mine ‘Single point load Slab depth 140 mm ‘Steel strength 8355} | Concrete nw Shear connectors welded | | strength 25130 iyinder/oubo) ‘maximum spacing of beams ara tim Tom T Tam wuroseo | T as | ss | oo | os | as [os | oo | os {as | as | oo | os ia Se ie as se re eo a ‘to ao a0 seo [5 | 73 eae] 63 cat 00 936/934 a gaa] a0: ed) A 62m any 48 oi 99m a0 [sre c4a|sos cao) a cae] 73 cat] 03 gas 7a gat ee sed] eo ced] ee 9ai] 09 eas] a2 ocd] ce dae a0: |sa8 cae] in cao) 99 cat] os cas tox eed tens ne ved] ae bel 2 aaa] 70: gua) an: ces| eaces ‘0 yan ca a4 79 eta 100 c6a| bo saa 73 cea o2 2 0 fs ese|ta esd] 3 c60) 98 ce r23/cad ow se na cal Ye en so {08 100 oo6|129 e648 5] sao ces a0 cea| too cual os cos so Pesce ins tai ce ace 0 F | ive cog) =< [toa ced ier cadliga cuz Tn 100 0 0 i ‘eo a0 { te 40 03 zo See 2 ea scaal aio [ae gl 19 6 So plat oa as 099] 34 93d 31 366 |r: aso} ron sae 5 930) aga 4a 99a] 44 a32) 40) go) 8 ae se0-| 58 cas] a8 cao ioe tue en eed 73°92) 6s) asd] sak 320 [ire cea rea cae tha Sedne cea] nae esd Sa teal ee nen 340: frag eal iro als ca] sas elves cee 128 cg 109 oan] neuen Bo e649 soo 30 |" =| t89 cao tos cae] sa0 cas tea cay tea cat tz cae ne ee] tao ce ts ced senso] ina eel sea eae} so ce] 0-08 toa coin oa ee Maced so of toes yes cesta ¢ woo aivafacwals surat cea iea ce Hes | 1 180: aa gad] ax od 28 02s] ae aaa 00 [64 o24] 60 od 88 oo ss 93d 38 024 38 ead 93 om z20 | 8a 2e] 89-034 75 ou] om oe Sioa ano 22 emf aoiest 200 [s0 o20]sn0 veal 04 Sa] tr Sa Yo 9am] os a Sela gaa] co eae 250 fre el 9 cof son cc] 0 ee] 6 god] vo nad) ea 200 [rea eso] seo cal ras cr] ro ca a eee os 300; |180:540l 471 al sea cal ra aaa cee 10.0 eH 109 fis coal 74 he seeps 2 ‘78 cua isa caste cae nea celta cod so8ieed 97 cen toons: Jina saetsenics| roe [yaieed uncon wae For further information see notes preceding Table 1 91Deck: MEDIUM Table 45 SEAM DATA SLAB DATA interns Beam Fire ronnie Somme ERSEE TERRES “Two point onde Si denn ¥20mm Steet renath sass} | Con Shear connectors PX Ae diameter eyidlarcube) maximum spacing of beams am rpose 28 tam [as | oo T TE w 20913 0530274 37 xaq xaal 3058165 49 a560127% 3) x39 95601713 48) xs x57 406314039 xag 4004179 54 sae7ausan 09 asrtons67 x0 sancat0x ez] mad} Po e10«z291109 zac) oe 43 188 208200 44 x53 xe 242 7 3051305 97 xioel 240] -356x008129 3189] 53 149) aa 53 @ 29 (40) ‘86140 ‘36 10] 24 iao| 039 tao] 78 383 38 04 48 1038 ¥40| 10 38 6s For further information see notes preceding Table 1.Deck: MEDIUM Table 46 BEAM DATA SLAB DATA | [Fie resistance BO mine Slab depth 140 enm Concrete ‘Shear connectors Weides diameter a Tre ‘maximum spacing of beams - Toa Tia 35 as_| 4s | eo | ys | a5 | as | eo | 25 tw TORE NE NTE ew a a = | x42] 40 424] 40 «24 xas] 5 030) 40-93 49 ¢ 44 920} 40 020) x5q 59 9 50 939] 46 926] 386012733] x20) 40 4: azz) 40 «21 ssecr7ix as] 63 9 x6) 94 oa soee140% 36] 48:62 x49] 60 42 408317854] 86 524 tad aa x69] 98 236) 90 44a] 75 x67] 110 240) 99 4421 83 x74] 128 aaa ton eal 80 eas) 400 asr=152¢ 52] 26 990] 79 930) 73 333) i x60] 8.3 420] 93 030) 8 x67] 108 220] 105 +40] 90 xref 19 4321113 400] 94 aaa] 1 82}133. 430) 123 442] 10 6. a57<191x 67] 123 44a] 108 aaa 89 o82 x90 165 4a] 4a 242/120 442 0° al 3.93 462] 0.4 469] 88 680, ssancar0x 82} 163 042 141 a2] 13,9 44al 0.1 gaa] tna aaa] tos aed 6482 x2] 181 04] 15.9 o 47] 13.3 aaa] 4 64a] sa aba] tna da 98 a1 101] 19.0 342} 165 wz 13.0 a2] 119 442] 33.8 #89] 120 4821100 44a] sioo] sf r76 aa] 12 442] 146 453] 28 089 108 41 nial. -/196 aaa] 01 42} 63 659] 143 8 48 a5 42) Ae 442] 44 440] 44 064 Sah ra ssl ee Sa] 50 oe 71 a 90 600 75. 102 asa 28 360] 00 4 ¥20-e8H] 196 69] 09 deg 242 44 980 si0«z29%101 130 042] 15,9 442] 13.6 442] 68 95a] 136 28% a9 e42/103 4 nrg 17.0 442/148 442] 1638 452] 146 652] 323 459 124 250 103 60] 9.1 xia] = 2] 134 482] 160 682] 13.4 59 138 1459] 10.0 xia) al Wa asa we asa 15.1 a6) 123 400) 110 ¢ 2on03% 6] xe] x69 x2] 48 929 43 930 40 930 as4x250473) 64 930) 81 939] 48 290 43 93] x89] 6.6 239] 63 30 56 939 63 oa s107] 90 930] 75 939 61 93 wiz] 10.1 630) 94 930 8.6 934 78 920 2167] 13.0 6012.0 930108 3] 98 oe 2051208% 97] 100 930 8.3 932) 84 9 4] 74: gual ste] 123 920113. 921 99 402] 95 64 3129] 143 930) 181 938 98 « 92g 84 oa t28 aati a. 39] 53 19 tlign aalteo aea| sa 6 100 ¢3 cot 70 143] 88 936 49 930] 45 034 70 926 63 936] 58 930) 40 142 54930) 42-436) 46026 6e4 aa] 45 9 2 30] 53 12 j 1933 447] 1098 442} 15.1 926] 138 90] 129 o3e| 17.0 gaa] 3 saa Bea «5 .]195 gaa] 157:436] 1606 @36 146/936 13:1 980)'35. 142] ‘86x368%129] 16.0 we 190 4 42/11.8 442] 101 44100 994 93 o36| 83 ge] 72 e829 142] sn = -|190 e460 128 936|113 949] 99 66a] 70 42 zo) oie aa 344 930] 1258 gaa]. 659] aa Fr further information see notes praceding Table 1Deck: MEDIUM Table 47 Shear connectors 25130 BEAM DATA SLAB DATA inornal boar [Fire resistance ‘90 mine =, = ‘Two point loads ‘Slab depth 130 mmm ae ees Steet strength 8.275 | | Concrete LW : EY Ae Strane {cinder cube) LL = maximum spacing of beams. Gea SPAN] — Tam om as oo | 2s | ss | as | oo | 25 | a8 | as | oo | 28 at ep ee PT NTO WPT 25410229 | 208302737 naa] 42 222] 49 22449 asal ras) 90 426] 60 oq] 48 a4z) 41 2a sosetesn 40] 60 426) 42 434 44 0} asext27« 35 xa] ee sear 7x45] 64 632] oa Tei] os aa 28 saa] os oad] es ea2] 61 240] 59 e848 dad 41 a2] 43 034 406x140" 39] 5.0 «20 soot sal 08 343} 46 60] 8.1 aa} ‘ «4s71052¢ 52] 8,0 332 x60] 2.8 5 0 ror) 1038 » 34 rls 6 xaa}ias 449 sencaroce2] ws az] mor 69 44a] 4 x32] 200 #43} os to a62) 99° 6821 74 8 53] 99. 8 21682] 104 48 faz] s30 382i 31, 0 aaa] v4a a6al 12.9 482] 10. 45% erox229n101] 19. 42 aa 19 452] 98 asi x25] oa 39 452] 115 452] 08 95a 121 aed} maa} ou tee ad 26 452] 10.0 062] 134 46 ‘200x203 ag xsl x6 asexasex 73] 59 oe rad too aaa] 83 040] 71 943 2051208 97] 10.4 4.42} 99 ‘rii6] 120 64a] toa a2 as aq] 7 aq mia7| 198 64al ina az] as aa) se 158 6a] 124 442] 11.1 Ppa roel 12.2 dal tes 4-42] 13.6 saa] n8 aaa rea] = - [19.9 4a] 65 442] 140 04 Mass] |= fe = =| s08 aaa 5.4 649 158 42 6268x120) 2 gd} 104 aaa] 88 64a] s0a o8] a9 os) ya a] 63 242) 38 3s nr] fb ad] 36 64a]in8 349 tn as 74 469 63 204] ye a2] 4 642] 131 6 34.983 93 ase] 70 For further information see notes preceding Table 1. 94Deck: MEDIUM Table 48 BEAM DATA SLAB DATA internal beam Fire resistance 30 mine Two point loads Slab dopth 140 mm Steet strangth 8.365 | | Concrete Nw : ‘Shear connectors Welded | | Strength 25/30 7 2 reube) { maximum spacing of beams as_| 60 as | as | 60 200 | 43 924] 40 926 3.8 026) 34 9 200: | 20 920) 14 9 3 6.893 40:98 400 [os ae] on aa 6s 93 54 94d) 38 940] 38 5 450° [196 44a] 119.443 89 334 73-489 Be ps2] 40 500 14a as 119 waa] a9 aso 78 908 68 400 sso] [101 aad tsa as sos 89/469 2.1 484 tse as] eo a) 124 a 11.9 4801 0 4.0 5.0 930] 38 930] 28 926 21 o36] 6 999] 48° 93¢] 48 994 4), 996) 9: 02¢} 90. 18 442] 60 430] 56 934] 60 926 46 096) 98 gal 38 gaz! 31 ga 8.8 936] 60 930] 54°96) 48 942} 41-p42 3a 942] 38 942 a3 ae 7B a3 70 o36| 64 g40 54 g42] 49 942] 45 94] 40 gaz 42 130 aaalt 104 639 93 450] 80 60) 7.0: 442) 6.6942) 5. gaa] Ba pe =] 1a aaa} te 447 136:052 103 so 130! 82] 1b8 sald 42] 14,8 V4 Silo IE Lato eae Lam ogee a 240 | 5 930] 80 099] 46 929 «2 090 21 oe) 260 | 69 20]'68/020| 89 930) Se 93940 439] a8 Gam) 24 e's) sn each mo |'n9 3) 8) 020) 74 030 he 92 51 439 48 920 43 030] 30 300 |112999]109' 990 92 a2) a 9. npg 320 ia p20] 124 932/110 aaz] 95 aad 79 38 22 924] & 240 | 18.929] 145 049] 127 44a] to 243 93 094 85 9387 60 [in 942 s6.0 o4a]s94 aaa 118 aed toa g3t 99 939] 09 934 40] 2] sa eal te aaa] tae aed 1¢0:9 ad a gad tra ‘80 183 a42|s63 64a saa 492 m [roa 163402 ae. caa} 8 15014 220] 40.930) 38 apres 330) 992) 34/940] 31 oa #5942} 40 gaa] 4asgie, 2142) 74942] me: pat toa ‘42] 38 950] 89 360 105880 For further information eee notes preceding Table 1 95Decl MEDIUM Table 49 BEAM DATA SLAB DATA 7 Edge boom Fire rosietance 30 mins ‘Single point toad ‘Slab depth 130mm ‘Stee! strength | 3.356 | | Concrete kw Shear connectors ‘Woldod diameter Strength 25/30 Ieyinder/oube) Pr maximum spacing of beams a Fs Pa Em Pea prerces pra 264x102x25) 64 n24| 49 n 24 x29] 7 120 60 29] 45 266n146033] 85 026) 65 20] 49 27] 108 ¢26| 8 929) 6.3 sosnto2x 29] 9.0122) 80 124] 68 ze] 48 woo na] nao aoskt27% 37]128 £24) 10.8 29 88 hae] 78% aon 42] 14.1 20] 120 629 28 ze] 90 29] 70 890] $3 N90) 4. m0] ar hel xaq sa 626] 2a] 08 hao] 84 mae 6: nad an nae ae sae 626]110 28 108 n30 63 nay nad oo na 23 n20) rat 48 nad 123 2 80 626/408 +2 500127 35 x3 36601714 25 2 matali» bs na Nata aad be nad aa nae ents. 2448 en] .20 oa ws ea] oY #0] 08 13a) ee- had ea nado nae eee aes creas canto casts cot ac canna cay en can tom tax 08 nad] 0s mad oo nae soonses tea cafias oat oo ‘Sd shad 30 nad ea wae 7 Cilio cafe ca ‘Sia cad ao nad oa wae Ff TS EaLT 7 CEPEG Sete can cata oq toa rad an nae sora tahsens 125 Soften uta fan Go] oa cad te noe red of cot 18 con wee sag] tee ou tue aq in0 cad 9m ae ro: oy 12h col ib cage saan Cai cine na rey ca “lina esl see safres can no coq san coe tt oe raps rymest} cco cna tai cal wea cara aoe serene) sis Cin] © oa coaluea com tuo a0 vrs cag too ee] t23 ea Toa nae xa ea cape 2°75 CSdite cana nae ‘a uh santo Lg kg ekbeas sash ox sa: |: ae 2 rea SS coe sroaast04 Byes oo can mag] z —|_-+ pomz0ax 46] 0 ef a8 sa nal a9 Thine hoa non hata haat nag] na hada af 49 9a 4a had sees 2 soy oao | 5 jason ta alton haga tata no O36 mid cske i 10H SEONG Shine oaa]ina nasa maton nae wo ne foc pe SS SSE RS ea a] ee malas nals nae a] =: 24] 2 Ey ta noujiaaihaes ne a) chil] Le] ova sence laa paleo vel Z 200 nae 80 nad tha nae For further information see notes preceding Table 1Dec! MEDIUM BEAM DATA s.AB DATA re resistance —S0 ina ISEEEE Sab coptn 140mm TS sass | | once rw nes ‘Shear connectors Welded Streng (25/30 : \ diameter 19mm | | eyinderiouber oy Var [2a me rs | as [es | eo [ce | as | os | oo | SeScaTON Be epg eee ee ear ae car aT. stance] 42 930] 49 va | aemcaeea vita nal s0°y 21] 130 ta] 90.124 nad ee gad ae nf Tikits fae eo hades ga os na] 49 sosnoas oe os "a 3 2 a tao] 48 sosatarcay| no tal a0. | tape nas Lalas tafats fa oa {39 s2 939] £8 939 wo hd Niftes tafiag ea = {50] 79 nag aa na0] es nq 48 nod reduve cases cat 2] tna oz fon ca] a na] t 3 Yo gad or nae 48h asexsarc aa oa 10] 9 tale talaal Oa 1S 08 on x safina t2]st0 ta Galea tel e393 tas] 68 nag) oe ad * aseerrsnar tea an ta) ca 5 €3e]a tan oo 13] at ca] 13 ca] 0 ta hat ao nae Taiftns ox teo ca asian 12]t03 ca] as 0] 43 eae] on toe] or had] en ad 48 hat coer esta aftaa cata carom 0100) oo Fae] 8 had 90 ad oa ae x tia] 94 oz 104 cx] 129 629108 £39 130 4 19 ead 68 Nad om ae soos40e af 48 23] 180 124 32 cana val 9 Ya soe om a0] 89 na] a nae “aefioa fae rae cam te sara tale 1 Ba 39] 93 hao nae aoonreted Ets Gaeise casas cay os fateae Ca tr td an ood er tae se " ans cxf ten ca] ra oa] 00 0] t29 ead ns ea 9 aq 9 ae oe Sanfioa cx] tno cx] tat 2121 0140 toe 4 to4 aq tae oy cay 2” S"]ina alten 0] sae eaten 0s ten ad ted oad mo ae senosace] | hefoao ran] tee a9] th elves tas tao a vag 7 ooo pee salses lea os 8 tod tox cad 90 e30 fel ek Sa Ia se SS ot cae alt cata cag to ee 2 eee a3 ae] 24 139091 oa ea om eae raf] a 58/0] tat oer a faa a 8 oad oy Moe tha Cae int ea a eae ssstct oy | z : Silanes fol: i qe tseha ui : nal : Br Taman val aaah ane a tou ‘3 $8 f0 40 990 an Nan oe nagos rates tae ao 7 alan a1 naa] ot gai ao nad en nada np ne ; tas had vs nad sonater0| Loli dated sbaasedreentere tad nny qo senate naasd a : For further information see notes preceding Table 1.Deck: MEDIUM Table 51 a DATA suas ara arson fees sg “ oR Sitges nd sean om Tae Seeavonath sa7s| | Sawer we ; aaa Sow cots sre asi POET ON awe pO : = maximum spacing of beams om or Soe resell taoel Stra eat eel (oe Erato 28 1A ee ee wT TE RT TC PE YO vy escuwrow TT Se RS i is “a “Tn “Te oontaae so] <8 6 SEhee Seenozs | 20 123] 40 tl asecaseai| e412] a8 tae] aa te So] en tae] 2a. tae 00 cae] 80. nae gas La 8a fo] ee cae es cat an cae] et han 40m aosisoas af ex taal 6 fae] a0 120] 43123] 40 t24 <2) 45 tae] eo tao] 09 toa] ss baa] an ra] a ea aeect7539) 40 toa] 00. tas] 69 tae] aa. Fae oaitaal aa. ta] 44 nae eed ae taLSS tae] na eae ee eae na tae] 0a fan ea had] 4a wan 41 aa SGL25 lee tar 02 cae ts cau es tan] oa tana nao] 60 nao] oa nay 43 nad aosnress spies tall og cael oe eae] ee cae] 20 tan] oa 10] ea nae) a na at na x 84] 14,3 © 26] 12.2 © 26) 10,0 © 26) 26) tod ae 30] 7.1 €30| 60 n30| 69 nad 54 n34| 4.0 n 34] aseca7s So 02 sao] 91a] 80 a2] aa tae] 9a aahn 2a 6 Fae els ta] setae] oa tae] 20 cad 2a alc tal a tan] 492 61 190] 48 Fa aserietasfias tase cae] So cae] en cae a tan] a fo] a can] 8 ca] a ran] 88 faa relies 1185 Cag cae] 0 case Fan] os ca Ze cox] 0s em] 20 ran] cn 13 TOUS C223 Cod es cas som cass canton cao ne cao) 2a] 0 Fae 78 0] ro] Mea cae canta cad Siafion cag a3 ca soss4oe 9} 8 #23] ,08 133) 99 124] 0a ea 8 124 foal ayaa] st ta fefins tae[ss tae a 62] he cae Yom 0 Sees Sep. MISS Sasfinh Safa cae] ts cao Colas codon ca asnssas fr 124] so 42] el 9 cat 124 oa ‘so eo) toe Canine ca] cae 3 a0 oy ta te a eae no cag te aa : ta asmoree) sia canon eae] ae oa ol reds: wal oa oa fs pan : oa i ca oad ssoarorea| S| : : ee S34 Pt ees £ : oa eroxzzest1 Totton a] 03 wae] 0a na om 4 so] 23 cam] 28 nae sae 44 nae] 40 m9 x 60] 10.5 28) 8.8 261 6.5 26] §.3. 26) 6/1 .n39 4.0 L]tS5 Cds] sos cao nae] es nay] to nag 8s 9] 40 5 mas pci of bare ans ae = x6 128 €30 10.8 90)11,3 #34 san x82} 186 © 30, 15.3 © 30] 13.0 c 30] 148 c 36] 12.1 838) 9.0 n 3 eth ios] 1 190 «3 186 42] 129 naa] ere lea aewoot th cael Soe “J eel ae eee 2 mote ea For further information see notes preceding Table 1. 102Deck: MEDIUM Table 56 = nee ae ante ge ; — se eS Te Bree ang | [Ene ia F comes SE a an: L = maximum spacing of beams For further information eee notes preceding Table 1 a oe aa ae T Ten 1 TuPOSE T UGA ane as | co | os | a6 | as | co | os | as | as | oo | a5 DESIORATION TWP NRT Nw eT e160 T 180 200 240 270 300 49 nai] 26 na i 320 26 ned s8 haa) 48 na 360 | 126620] 109 92] a1: nag 05-9 e999) 28 400 [143 p20] te9 naalrne nod 94 nad 26 39] $8 039 45 Nao] 44 neal 34 nad #80 *[ > =| 0 n34 1506 n34 v4 934120 a0] 09°h59] 7480: nal 4 naa] 0 nual 8 Wa 00 185 34 174 nae] 130 440] 104 neg] 126 neal 98 haal 73. neal 8a nae sso fo ey 22] ana a a se ga tet al toh ae] a na 620 = 133 das raclies naslin8 nas ja} Wea 100 | 340 380: 220 240 [51 994 «0 nad 200 rae] a4 nad a8 naa] 300: [1a 930 11 mae] 83 aq] es nad] 6 had) 49 had BH) 320 166 920] :29 n2q|t0 nod) a3 nad] 8 had) OS had] 49 a0) 99 nc] 94 naa] 300 168 34 126 moe 10.0 n3e| toa hago] 63 KAO} 48/0} a8: hiel 9 a] 2360 200 n34]149 nod] 11.9 na4/t31 940] 103 nad) 26 had) 00 had] 06 mal C0 nal 9.8 na 409 z *|160 N3a] 183 90] te4 540] oa a0| 8 neo] sOO hae 28 hae ea hae 450 : w]e nao 24 nao) 9 taal a nae] 8 nae 00 : "| en) 94] saa heel e nae 200 [a1 nad 220. | 54.034 savnad 240 [70 93a a nad a8 nad 200° [ress $5 nad] 62 ina as wadlae fh mo [rts ts nad e2 nad ee nad $1 na 38 449 39 949 300) 101 420) 480-6341 t1.9 nad] 9 nad 213° h40) 64 ao) 43) 60° 320 4183 had 126 nae soa nad 34 nao) 69 bao) 84 hal 86 nee 44 naa] 39 nae 340 : Snasnayetsuata sera ast 50 hat] a3 m0 tounad.- ”s=|ax baal hao] ono] r9.0:rae| t's na 8° 103Dec! RE-ENTRANT Table 57 BEAM DATA ‘SLAB DATA _ Internal bear Fire resistance ‘90 mins Slab depth 120 mm Concrete A Strength teyinderioube) Tit shear connectors aren pai (N = numberof pairs 1 = maximum spacing of beams Som Tae ae as | as | co | os | as | as | oo | vs | as | a | oo | 25 Ce a ew ee TT WP WT x2 21] 48 440] 49 nag} | | aseri4exay ° 73) ° 4s 92} 43 02 za) so] ca cso] sa cat] 84 c2al 80 930] 45 048) 08e127% 97 as) ba Lag] 88 Ca na oso] swat a9 esa] 40848 xa x0 Se ct aa nea] 4a aad 47 ace nq cad] 78 $0 a2) 42 eA 49 a8 aosc1655 6 a0) aa cael Se eas] 09 950] 0 050] 53 ca] 44 ned] 46 924 42 a0) ma al 78 Cea] 42 noel 8a gaa 49 o40) 43 054 sseii271 25 20 93d 76 840] 4 cae] ral x29 72 cat aq asoni7in as a0 cat se) noe x37] tia esd 90 ex | neo 4o6«140% 3} 169] x8] xl asrats2x 02 x69 oo) oa 133 30] 108 660] 82 e48/115 486] 100 80] 93 eel 7.1 149 060] 121 4a] 104 e50) 130 e811 e889 coe] 79, Stel 12. 6 aa 9155 50] 144 co] 124 e810, e88| dl 143 et te cb 190-669] 1038 80] 9 ese 0/185 650, 10s c58) 41-680] 11.6 86] 100.59] 129 50] 6.6 eae tse $14 658] 95 60) 123 80] 180 89 W706 $20 e610. 80] 133 te €50 78 e| a9 €56| 138 <]s23 59 sa os 1198 668) 18.0 x107] 16 nr29] 198 2081208% 97] 7.9 sarong pee ead to tee] mo cso ree oi é na roo fale ona ae es n-[329.084) Sill 90 93 S5 hae] 48 639 44 630) 40 02 594] 85 oa 74 nad) 610 n 42] 59 90g 5a o40|t0.9 940] 86 nq oo nal 7.1 926] 68 ° Seofr0. 260) 88 oaa| 78 cal] 8A 942] 78 Bt naa oe 9 00] 12.1 50] 100 «. 103 950| 93 64 80 nu] oo aad 260] 141 €50] 1,8 650 100 « 80] 123 108 cM 70 nad 03 Seo] 172 e50] 147 c80| 129 «60180 59] 129 e104 ns2| 83 hae 10.4 @ 75 co] 00 0] 18 © 80 C8 12.6 h40] 10.1 hae] 13.4 gl 00] 154 os] 128 6010.9 0] 138 ea 116 e866 ce) a9. c50| 104 920} 1738 280] 148 59 165 c68] 133 =8e] 11.0 80] 946 eso] 121 cm] fon 4s nal 4a. / tee ose) 178 666383 00] 128 oso] 108 ce) 139 fo] 2 ran endl tee ee 74 26a] ta 0123 coe) 180 Sols 21S Shane se] tae nz 154 © 0 oi ca] 18 ee] 12a e64| 170 c68| 146 00] 121 cos] : 178 €68| 95.1 086] 104 c6¢| 168 cos] 13.9 88] 11.9 m8 104 For further information e2e notes preceding Table 1.Deck: RE-ENTRANT Table 58 BEAM DATA stan pata Tnteral beam re resistance 30 ming or = Single point load Slab depth 420mm POSSE Stee strength 355 | | concrete nw : po ‘Shear connectors wit || Stengt, 25/30 : ATS tyne ievinder/oube) A EEREA fet TRi shear connectors rein pas (N = numberof pas) LL = maximum spacing of beams [eear-srar = Tm oon ] Ueabanine | a rs | as | as as | as | oo | os DESIGRATION [LW mre Te WPL Np Wyte ores | as "5 = Te coeff assrioa 29 “9 apaisaecas] 49 39] 46 0 40.9 a4} 73 oae] 08 a oa soma a9] 6a ae 68s a] 7a sad] 90 asa Sai} ea eat] ae esa sosrioor a a8 aso] 26 ee sual 6 a] oe ose asdfioe dea] a os eeatz7s 2] 20-223] 60:94 x30} 79.034] 70s aoont710 4 98 weal 90 S00 i] i geal oo v2 ‘ xen] tea asdf za oad be a sones4on 29] 8-40] 902 oe soosi70c te 20 a3] 2 tee a) rea geal ize 08 oa ei tee etal tae 0 fala aed] os geo] nid tna geal tea esa toa aes 129 24) 129 aed] 9 ssnxvenn tata e8a 123 aa te 2 760) tes aba] 8 ds 2 oa cay oi 3 rer]tza eedtaa asal ae ved toa ead 343 600 98 3 rite ausise asa] tas o82 tne a 13 600 100 aq 88 saa] ng asa] 7s oso] tae ana to 0 129 a6o]s08 a0] 34 4 ‘s7aters6i| 70 6] 349 a tra geo oa eo tt 7 toe ol tes asa 19 aed] t2a geo] io veo] te @ : a asd 128 asa{ ts ea toa veo tna geo] ae sed 12 x wea aad 13 52/150 1a e013 0100 a1 Rael =< “Jane os ta Gea{ 7a an] i99 040 128 geo] wenennor| |e as 1a gua] cag tao dea tas geo] tea pe ee ‘80 ga] s00 960] de 339 oo] 30 09 ma] o- 199 c6o]t74 oan ine deo vze ge] tei ea] os Hs oan ios ato t3a eo] ea 070 wal) : Son Naa deltas oo sa 9 sel uh 3 170 a7]sae e70 aoaoex a] a9 o2] ae 029 «2 924 40 pa 7 ‘rei] 98 p20] e9 g2e «2 924 48 ga] zed 290] 85 436 81 pai] 49 o9d ely 039] 58 940/81 asa] 48 gael a8 3 $a) 81 ds2 70 a0 90 gad] be 2oenzbex 72] 119 gt] 99 86203 dai] 20 082 71 a9] ee wan] 29 asa] 119 asa 93 asa] 03 esa an gaa] at os 10760 | 191 o83| 10 8a] a8 vez] 08 gal a 3x00 3190 os] ta 989 o4a] saa gad 119 6 nel aa asa] ea esa|tas aoa as ae sotea0en 57:01 283 ta3 eas] 9-450 roa @ site) oad tea oes] ae a8 rae eens aed] tne a3 740.9 : Seles lneae ia 11 For further information see notes praceding Table 1Deck: RE-ENTRANT Table 59 EAM DATA __ SLAB DATA Taternal beary Fire resistence 90min ea Single point load Slab depth 120 mm Steel strength 8275 | | Concrot ‘Sheer connectors Strength {eytinder/cube) THK shear connectors are in pairs (N = nomber of pairs) L = maximum spacing of beams SEAM Sea Bom Tom a ] toi | as | 4s | eo | 7s | as | os | oo | rs | as | as | 00 | 78 Po a Ww verve mtn “| "| 208«139% 30] 40 92 2oeetaoe31 x3 40 xe ae 064102424 naal 21 069] 79 e809] 65 c80 65 somerese 40} 7.2 cA] 68 eas] 6.6 cad) 40 3560127433] 66 233) aa ae “a 4a] 100 48) 88 sq] 90 660) 75 tas eso 1x60] 129 «59 aeret52e 69 ray cl ize eso] ron ca asnnoiesy eS i33 Sal nc ca a eis aa] ca 2 afro coe sana stoftes Coo) tae Ma ea] aa Coa) tan “so Stofrns ena © ® Cag coat co Fs (pane ramet er be toa cam toa seta © Foe qe en sne 6 feces Toesatee a] oa ave] 8a oad val tof ee oso ot oe hal as aaa reefs gad oo Soy fol 9344 rae] 10. o80| 28 #9) 79 esq] 63 cto| 6s x29] 1.8 c89| 1041 e80] a4 esd 7. ea 2a 254] sio7] 128 cat] 116 cue] 96 a0) 83 cag 20 ese Zaza] 0 esol 40 c20| 1.8 60] 98 o4a| 12 cel 10.8 ese zene a 172 660] 143 4a] 123 089] 15. © 130 cue 4a on 102 c64] 08 cua] 7.1 neo 78 260] 63 cod] 6 coe Zoi] as es9] 78 c8d| 64 00] 54 cat] 58 sae 905«3004 87] 148 280 128 © 50] 04 eae] 89 cad) 31.1 et] 88 88) wr19] te so] e420] 0.9 © 48 101 c40] 126 50108 e5é] Gi coal 28 con] 6 coe Bray] at eto] tes 80] 198 «601.6 esd] 145 csi] 125 cad] on 30 cee Bisa} [ine eto] 16s 6012. 60 64 coe] 4 39] 300 ssa 7a ceo : 0. e80] tea oso] ~~ -/174 e8@| tna oe 122 © as ces oa aa za 550 © 1636 ts cee NS] =] 2 o clia csalaea cog = = -|179 codltea coals oe eere| taseod ove cse| tea oe) t39 co017.8 cos] 53 69] 126 C64 108 cO4 For further information eee notes preceding Table 1. 106Deck: RE-ENTRANT Table 60 BEAM DATA SLAB DATA [intemal bear Fie resistance ‘90 mine = Single point load Slab depth 130 mm 7 Steel strength sss | | Conceete Nw ey Shear connectors Strength 25/30 j By Z£ height (cylindor/cubet a Hitt choar connectors are In pare (N ~ number of pairs) L = maximum spacing of beams BEAM SPAN ony Tom a aia 45 as_| 4s | 60 | 75 | a5 | as | co | os cw a | 220 | 3. 620 30 916 340: | 44 620) 41 924 36 034 270 | 64 034 60 940 49 £80 40 929 38 928 38 934 33 940] 300°] aa +80) 79 4 S06 482} 56 929) 53 ga 38932) 3334] 90:02 320 |toe 452] 93 a2 88 480) 78 gsa 7 4 . 360.125 82] 309 35 73 4829 na we 4400 |153 82 199 asa]i4 esa a6 asa tre ae) 10 sed) 80 4450 90 42] 165 959] 13.9 vq 120 asa 143 ae) 28 4 346479] 98470 sso fos was as] - + [490 4 W770 1801479 WEA 100) 120 140 180 | 420) | 200 | 40 939 38 939 35 024 a2 024] 220. | 66 430) 8 929] 49 93e 6s] 36°02) 240 | 79 934) 74 940] 68 954 59 asd 60 a2] 250° |r0- ge] 9 5a 70 ssa) oa 934 zao [123 o82/108 952 90 459] 78 oa 300: | 1485 a to asa 9 sa 00 20 [tea asa] 121 a8 10 082124 30 a) 340 ]10.3 689 134 482 11.6°6852 198 60 400) 109964 380 | 178 482 160 452] 129 982/159 o60, 69121 679 400 | 190.083] 1698 453 a4 1800) 144¢ 879 soo] a oepeans aes 80 wo ded 200, 2 : i ae 40 160 100: }-4 029] a6 524) 200 | 6.0 920] 86 924 51 932] 48 930 38 934] 38 934 3 994 30 ol 220} m3. 030) 78 929 7.0 ge) 4 082). 934) 42\ 934] '48: 99} 41-020] 98 cal 240 11. 94a] 04 453 88 ae2 75 a8 70 934 68 gaa] G0 gaa Ss 982] 48 030) 200 fra 4821119 489| 100.¢82| 26.482) 9.1 940-85: 940] 26 980) Esse) 61-005) 20 ]'6. 482] 138 459 118 «82/100 2621118 964 104 460] a8 460] 7 ¢e0) 78 034] ‘00, | 0.4 482] 160 459{ 195 421106 42] 139 469 121459 toa de0] a we ae gal 220 a0 aa] 15.1 459191 452 188 aed] 136 c60 115 ae] 99 460) 12.0 g ea] 240 200 462] 16.8 052] 248 459 47,1 66] 18.0 seq 28/c00| 199 o58| 19814 70] 11954 380 1.3 482/160 462] 19.9 60] 165 sed 13.8 460] 120 460] 149 60 130 670 400: . = =| 98/400 168 se] 14.3 3.0] 178 60) 304-62) 450 e 7 nna] a39 dao] 71 469 10s 270 00 For further information see notes precedir Table 1 107Deck: RE-ENTRANT Table 61 BEAM DATA SLAB DATA, Tntemel bear (Fire resietance 90 mi Sa aSca Sees Two point loads ‘Slab depth 120 mm Shyness ae ‘Steel strength 8.355 | | Concrete iw fee Shear connectors iti | | Strength 25130 i c bight {cyinder/oubo) \ feed Le Titi shear connectors are in pairs (N = number of pars) L = maximum spacing of boame Tie Tom : Tam 7 POSED towpiwim | as | 4s | eo | x5 | a5 | os | oo | 7s | a5 | 4s | oo | 78 pesGHATON | CWO WPL WTC WL wt ete 203138 29 254x102x 2| | x24 254146 31 ex102% 26 x39 2084127 57] 024 xa item ad ‘0snt65 49 339 41 99q i xg 129 48 926 41 oa) | aebata7« 39 | | x29) 49 a2) 494 | asor7ix as 69 eez on a | xov]s04 a2) 74 342 x45] 73 sa 4o5n17e« 84] 0 aa as7aisa0 02] 9.1 043 xor] 124 34 aorerox67] 125 4a) 09 043 xmas Ga] 98 oa 3 x82) 45 G42} soe daa] a0 aaa) toe aaa] sud rz0 4 19 aaa] 10.2 342] 120 ds 242 138 42] 14 449] 3.8 68) 42 140 2] 120 449] 343 1 aa 180 daa] 12.8 62] 38 2 tee ga7 3 a2] 68 8 442} 96.1 642] 19.8 449] 169 a2 72 gat] 148 aaa] 174 052 231) 43 039 232] 74 92 @2 daa 6 938] 48 930] 43 039 29 92] 11 939] 93 649] 83 939| 78 o3t ba 980] 48 too gq] 9s 442] 73 442] a5 a29] 59.0) 50-404 20 gaa] 99 @ aA preteens 3a oa 10 4 a3 6 63 402i 5a. ®|tbeoustoa cada atte pa san om] top pao oo 93. For further information see notes proceding Table 1 108Deck: RE-ENTRANT Table 62 BEAM DATA __ SLAB DATA Internal bear Fira resistance ‘90 mine ee SESS Two point loads Slab depth 130 mm eles Steel strength 8355 | | Concrete EE Fl Shear connectors Hiti | | Strength ay Za {eylinder/cubo) EE \ : Hit shear connectors are In pare (N = number of pais) = maximum spacing of beams TMPOSED zs | as [as | 0 | 78 istenietaieel | 2081133330] 254x102 25] 2ex14643) x2) xa sose102x 2] 2008127 37 x4el 45 20] 44 995 «0 a6 x4s| 28 934! 45 234 a1 93 ‘asenta7 29 xa | ‘0n171x 45] 58 920] 54 924 49 a. x07] 89 900] 81 car] es aa2 5.0 442] 53 gaa] a9 gual 44 944) 40 ol 406014045) «8 oa] 48 232] 44 aa x40] 6.2 O54) 55 dao] 48 gaol 406«172% 54) 89 S42) 61 ¢42] 6.3 440] 50 440 46 94d 43 a] x60] 93 42] 80 saa] ee aad] 80 dai 58 gag 54 gaa 29 95 x67] 10. 442) 8 342] 25 a4 64 dao) 64 ga4 80 gad 84 98 aspetszs2| 73 939] 7.3 ou) 00] 99 139] a8 aaa] 3 330] xor]100 +36] 98 caz en @ 4 x7{r1 2a9]109 o| a5 al aaa 82) 128 442113 94a] oa al 454 aort9ixei|110 #42) 96 a4] 8.1 oa 34 xe nis aad 5 94a | eof 44a] 20 az 10. 3.9 aso sasczio a2] 0 42] 129 447 108 4 a 92) 16. ea] 4s gaa] 121 a] i09) 8.5 94a] 16a daa rae 3. 3 aus wa] 18.1 442)15,3 44a] 191 949] t49 689 130.6531 109 ae) roxzzaxt01} 200 oa 17.5 042] 14.6 442] 126 949] 144 0] 129 089] 105 #9] nay v7 a7 waa 4 193 a4 138 a8 "zosz03x 4} i x x26] ox x29] 830] 54 936] 49 924 m0} 826] 6 936 59 93644 oud a1 oud 0 938) 9. aed] 79 a0) % ‘a1 160) 124 940) 108 aa] 9.1 42 . ‘48 160] 48 150] 41 9) 143 442] 120 449] 104 @ : so) 62.130] 48 960] 44 oso 179 442] 150 342] 120 saa 08 8 140} 83° 30] 60.190] 58 ps0 ta aaa] t88 aaa - 130] 7180] 70 160] 68980 50} a4. 180] 914 160] 79. 160 90] 55 180] 5.0 900] 48 960 140] 63 180] 52 90] 64 950 #80] 70 180] 68 iso] 8.1 950 iso] 78 160] 78 160] 70 0960 150 gaz] 128 442] 109 44a] m1 padl 10a gat 90 980 79 48 179 442/150 4 42] 130 #42] 127 ga 120 gd 108 90] 93 17.0 az 8 642] 16.9 9 a] 13.6 9a 124 469) 108 For further information see notes proceding Table 1 109Table 63 SLAB DATA Fre resistance ‘90 mins ‘Sab depth 120mm Concrete we Two point loads aeelope: Steal strength 8275 ‘Shear connectors Haiti || Strength 25/30 : EE aoe EY ES LS Sheer connectors are in pale (N = Sumber of pars) L = maximum spacing of beams Tae som Tam yore DESIGNATION as [as | co | vs | as | es | oo | rs | a5 | 4s | oo | os ‘oat 254510225 24014603] x3 xaq osci02x 2 9051273 37 xaq xe 603127 39 gsext7x a8] €0 036] 86 442] 46 v2) 40 3 a x67 tal 5 982 45 4 4oex1 40x39 | ul 50) 4 5a] 64 650] 48 459,51 042) 49 908 40 454 aspers2e 0 au 43 a0) 29) fai] os a2] 4a 080] 4 683 xe] oa apa91 6) as xe9} 454 xoo| 334 ‘580x210 #9 434 109} a x2} % 012294101 os naa] 10 482 ‘208120044 an[ ss os x06] 5.1 934 4a gs 202s 79) 60 937 9 G42] 4 84g} 9 dao] aa 243) ato] 4a sas] as saa) as oad ‘ : 43 60416 re fe asa] ba ial 5a bel a gad 4 tos 442] 90 G82] 60 44] 59 Lae] 5a gad 6 res aa] a1 daa] ss aaa] 131 az 20 462] 73. L44| 721 tas] 6 920 8, |190 442] 158 44a{ 198 a4] 15.8 @ 2 459] 96 (44l a4 14a] 80 44 0: 7a 449] 49 daa] 7.9 0] ros 43 89 i44| 98 tae] 03 00] 79 400 tis 443] 95 642 81 042] se oi) 59 480) 68 i44| 69 60] 5. es6| ae 58 ae daa|t14 64a] 98 aaa! th ost 70 54 74 144] 73 64] 6 288) 0.3 400 sag 10 410 11 Salina sod ina geen 600 00 see tae 90_ tee 78 ooo For further information see notes preceding Table 1 110Deck: RE-ENTRANT Table 64 BEAM DATA SLAB DATA [internal bears Fe resistance 30 mine Fi ° Two point loads Slab depth 130mm + Steel strength 9.955 ‘Shear connectors Hii Concrete Nw ‘Strength 28/30 {evlindericube) Hilt shear connectors are in pais (N = number of pais) LL = maximum spacing of beams Tam T om Taam as | as | co | xs | as | as | oo | 7s | 35 | as 0 | | 2 ao | 200 | 40 934] a9 024 38 030] a2 924 $00 | 8 gael sa oan aa gad] a3 ga 32 6 deo] 28 sae] 20 gas aa aaa] oa sel ee 442) 93 44) 79 gaa] as 3088 elnhaatece tae ta Sew a tie Ps ; ie | soled oma 35 444, { 44 a44] 30 960 94 o8q 20 ig So [ad tod co end an sed sa sale nag es 240 [116 930)s00 sai] a0 e4a] 20 vo] ea gad 0 s.r 94a] 43160] 40 959.36 91 360 |s. a42 11.9 44a{ 00 24g es oad] 80 ged] 24 60 944] 50 iso] 400 | tere a2) 144 aa] s2.1 a4al toa co] 108 ga 8 50] 75 452] 64 80 ‘50 74 a2 1039 44a] 12.9 waa] 4a dal ne deal ioe o52| 81 a0) a6 80 soo | <-| | 80 a4a]sse gual 17a asl 15.1 asc) 39°40) 140:480) 48°51 80) 550 tao aaa) ~~ -| 175 a2] 149 492] 129 482 140 10 00: afusen 17 aul ta 4 EB 100 T i 160 260] 63 936] 6% 924 39 944 35 944 93 04d) 20:04 200 i038 9.36) 98 924 81 944 58 ga 89 39150] 36°90} 3.980] 90:90 20 [1209 9361.8 910.9 v4] 14 g4d 09 944 03 gad 5 150] 44 980] 39 esd] 36 080 240] 16.0 930] 735 449] 134 aaa) Be aad a. G44 73 g.4a|'60\ gaa] 59 1501 $1150] 46 p60) 41 (380 360 |170 ads. a a{ 2.8 04a) tot gad] 51 gad a geal 7.6 940] 60 150] $9 150] $4 p60 49 980 400 178 aa] 49 a9 joe gags 183.682 154 a2] 193 a1] 6149) 28 160|-79 aso 0a 90 141 (80) 129,150] 11.4 889 99.460, 1506 660) 13:1 469 114 460 $79 00] 36: 460) 330 4.00 For further information see notes preceding Table 1. 1REFERENCES 1 10. 12 BRITISH STANDARDS INSTITUTION DD ENV 1994-1-1 Eurocode 4: Design of composite steel and concrete structures Part 1.1: General rules and rules for buildings BSI, 1994 LAWSON, R. M. Design of composite slabs and beams with steel decking Steel Construction Institute, 1989 BRITISH STANDARDS INSTITUTION BS 5950: The structural use of steelwork in building Part 3: Section 3.1: Code of practice for design of composite beams BSI, 1990 BRITISH STANDARDS INSTITUTION DD ENV 1993-1-1: 1992 Eurocode 3: Design of steel structures Part 1.1: General rules and rules for buildings BSI, 1992 BRITISH STANDARDS INSTITUTION BS 5950: Structural use of steelwork in building Part 1: Code of practice for design in simple and continuous construction BSI, 1990 BRITISH STANDARDS INSTITUTION United Kingdom National Foreword and National Application Document for Burocode 4: Design of composite steel and concrete structures Part 1.1: General rules and rules for buildings BSI, 1994 (See Reference 1) BRITISH STANDARDS INSTITUTION BS 6399: Design loading for buildings Part 1: Code of practice for dead and imposed loads BSI, 1984 BRITISH STANDARDS INSTITUTION BS EN 10 025: 1993 Hot rolled products of non-alloy structural steels. Technical delivery conditions BSI, 1993 BRITISH STANDARDS INSTITUTION BS EN 10 147: 1992 Specification for continuously hot-dip coated structural steel sheet and strip. Technical Delivery Conditions BSI, 1992 BRITISH STANDARDS INSTITUTION BS 2989: 1992 Specification for continuously hot-dip coated and iron-zinc alloy coated steel flat products; tolerances on dimensions and shape BSI, 1992WL 12. B 14, 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 2 22, BRITISH STANDARDS INSTITUTION DD ENV 1992-1-1: 1992 Eurocode 2: Design of concrete structures Part 1: General rules and rules for buildings BSI, 1992 BRITISH STANDARDS INSTITUTION BS 8110: The structural use of concrete Part 1: Code of practice for design and construction BSI, 1985 BRITISH STANDARDS INSTITUTION EN 10 080 Steels for reinforcing concrete BSI (in preparation) BRITISH STANDARDS INSTITUTION BS 5950: The structural use of steelwork in building Part 4: Code of practice for design of composite slabs with profiled steel sheeting BSI, 1994 BRITISH STANDARDS INSTITUTION DD ENV 1993-1-3: Eurocode 3: Design of stee! structures Part 1.3: Design of cold formed thin gauge members and sheeting BSI (in preparation) BRITISH STANDARDS INSTITUTION BS 5950: The structural use of steelwork in building Part 5: Code of practice for design of cold formed sections BSI, 1987 BRITISH STANDARDS INSTITUTION BS 5950: The structural use of steelwork in building Part 6: Code of practice for design of light gauge sheeting, decking and cladding BSI (in preparation) BRITISH STANDARDS INSTITUTION DL ENV 1994-1-2: Eurocode 4: Design of composite steel and concrete structures Part 1.2: Structural fire design BSI (in preparation) BRITISH STANDARDS INSTITUTION BS 5950: The structural use of steelwork in building Part 8: Code of practice for fire resistant design BSI, 1989 NEWMAN, G. M. Fire resistance of composite floors with steel decking ‘The Steel Construction Institute, (Second Edition) 1991 COOKE, G. M. E., LAWSON, R. M. and NEWMAN, G. M. Fire resistance of composite deck slabs. ‘The Structural Engineer, Vol 66, No 16, August 1988, pp 253 to 261 WRIGHT, H. D. and FRANCIS, R. W. Tests on composite beams with low levels of shear connection The Structural Engineer, Vol 68, No. 15, August 1989, pp 293 to 298 11323. 24. 26. 21. 28. 114 JOHNSON, R. P. and MOLENSTRA, N. Partial shear connection in composite beams for buildings Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers, Part 2, December 1991, Pp 679 to 704 MOTTRAM, J. T. and JOHNSON, R. P. Push-out tests on studs welded through profiled steel sheeting The Structural Engineer, Vol. 68, No. 10, 15 May 1990 WYATT, T. A. Design guide on the vibration of floors The Steel Construction Institute, 1989. Fire Protection for Structural Stee! in Buildings Association of Structural Fire Protection Contractors and Manufacturers, Steel Construction Institute and Fire Test Study Group, Revised Second Edition 1992 NEWMAN, G. M. and LAWSON, R.M. Fire resistance of composite beams Technical Report ‘The Steel Construction Institute, 1991 ‘THE STEEL CONSTRUCTION INSTITUTE Steelwork design guide to BS 5950: Part 1: 1990 ‘Volume 1 Section properties , member capacities (3rd Edition) SCI, 1992APPENDIX A: Design Example 115The Steel Construction Institute Silwood Park Ascot Berks SLS 7QN sheet 1 of 18 A [Sayer Design of Composite Beam to EC4 to uniform loading. Consider an internal composite beam A-A between columns and subject Composite beam = om oe eaeanirsepse eters pmo __|™" July 1993 at oa CALCULATION SHEET JWR July 1993 DESIGN EXAMPLE OF A 10 m SPAN COMPOSITE BEAM TO EUROCODE 4 J-> / = 116The cncruction EE = z PUB 8219 siwet 2018 [A Institute — = Design Example snowman tntesisre | Desien of Compose Beam to ECE Fong sae — DMO July 1993 CALCULATION SHEET JWR July 1993 Note: - Slab designed for 114 hours fire resistance EC4 unless Imposed load 5 kN/m? or (4 + 1) kN/m? otherwise Design D Hoor Dimensi Span Lo = 100m Beam spacing 6b = 30m Slab depth hy = 130mm Depth above profile h, = 80mm Deck profile height hy = 50mm Unpropped construction throughout, Shear Connectors: 19 mm diameter stud (100 mm overall height) 95 mm length after welding (h) | Materials Steel: Grade S355 C1. 3.3.2 Nominal value of yield strength f, = 355 N/mm? up to Table 3.3 and including 40 mm thick steel, Partial safety factor y, = 1,05 UK NAD. Design strength fy = £ = in = 338 N/mm? Concrete: Normal weight concrete strength class C25/30 Cl. 3.1.2 Density = 2400 kg/m’ (23,55 kN/m') 7Steel Construction Institute Silwood Park Ascot Berks SLS 7QN Tab Tile Tab The aa PUB 8219 sheet 3 of 18 ‘A €e: Design Example Sabjnst Design of Composite Beam to EC4 Ba CALCULATION SHEET July 1993 Loading Concrete Slab Weight = [239 x 10° - a (120 + x0] 23,55/106 = 105 x 23,55/10 = 2,47 KN/m? Constr EN/n? Concrete slab = 247 Steel deck (allow) = O15 Reinforcement (allow) = 0,04 Steet beam (allow) = 0,20 2,86 kN/m? Construction load = 0,50 kN/m? 0,5 kN/m? in UK NAD Composite Stage kN/n? Concrete slab = 247 Steel deck = 015 Reinforcement (allow) = —0,04 Steel beam (allow) = 0,20 2,86 kN/m? Ceiling and Services = 0,50 kN/m? 11gTob We: fev. The PUB 8219 shoot 4 of 18 A Stee! Construction Te Institute ee Siwood Park Ascot Berks SLS.7QN eax — Design of Composite Bea TEs, ‘Telephone:(0344) 23345, aoe ° ae Faxes) 22944 DMO. July 1993, Cheeked By CALCULATION SHEET JWR July 1993 Imposed EN/n? Occupancy = 40 Partitions = 10 5,0 KN/m? The designer is obliged to use BS 6399: Part 1 in the absence of an BS 6399: equivalent Eurocode. According to BS 6399 imposed loads may be Part 1 reduced with respect to the beam supported area. For the purposes of this design example this reduction will be omitted. Initial Selection of Beam Size From Design Table 8 a suitable section for an imposed load for Page 55 of | 5,0 KN/m? would be a 406 x 178 x 60 UB Grade S 355 Text Section Properties and Dimensions Section Properties} ho = 406,4 mm a 360,4 mm see Ref. 28 1b = 177,8mm Ay 76,1 cm? ty = 78mm Ty = 21540 cmt = 12,8 mm Woe = 1195 cm? ¢ = 177,8/2 = 88,9 mm Nominal value of yield strength f, = 355 Nimm? (ty < 40 mm) € = VQ35/f,) = 081 119The Fav, Tob We PUB 8219 shoot 5 of 18 A Top Tie Design Example ‘Subject Steel Construction Institute Design of Composite Beam to EC4 wood Park Ascot Berks SLS 7QN — none | Telephone:(0344) 23345 ¥ Fax(0344) 22944 DMO July 1993 Tracked by Date CALCULATION SHEET JWR July 1993 Section Classification ct, = 694 < 10€ = 81 Table 4,1 dit, = 46,2 < 72€ = 58,3 Table 4.2 <. The cross-section is in Class 1 and a plastic hinge can be developed. Since the beam is simply supported and uniformly loaded, only the mid-span hinge will form and thus plastic analysis can be used for a Class 2 cross-section as well. Ultimate Limit fin Dead load factor yg = 1,35 Table 2,2 Imposed load factor yg = «1,5 Slab + beam 2,86 x 1,35 3,86 KN/m? Sheet 3 Construction 0,50 x 1,5 0,75 kN/m? 4,61 KN/m? Total Design Load = F = 4,61 X10 3 = 138,3 KN Design Moment == = Msg = Basx 10 72,9 kNm [Assume the beam in the construction stage is laterally restrained by the | Section 4.1 of ldecking since the decking spans perpendicular to the beam and is Text directly attached to it. 120Tab WG: Rev The er PUB 8219 shoot 6ot 18 4 ‘Steel Construction <& tears leanne She Pasion Beample Sitwood Park Ascot Berks SLS 7QN cre — asin of Composite Beam to EC4 | Telephone:(0344) 23345 ‘er 7 ad Fax: (0348) 22984 ue July 1993 Checked by Date CALCULATION SHEET JWR July 1993 Moment Resistance of steel beam = Myyy,pq where: EC3 Pant 1 Cl. 5.4.5.2 1195 x 338 Sheet 2 Meera = Woe XS = === = 403,9kNm > 172,9 kNm is_satisfactoy nce e structic cs Composite si imit in Slab + beam = 2,86 x 1,35 3,86 KN/m? Sheets 3 & 41 Ceiling and services = 0,50 x 1,35 0,68 kN/m? Imposed load = 50x15 = 7,50 kN/m? 12,04 kN/m? Total Design Load = F = 12,04 x 10 X 3 = 361,2 kN Design Moment == — Mg = 282% 10 = 45S KN Effective Width of Compression Flange, bey Cl, 4.2.2.1 2x ¢, = F-— Fora simply supported beam, ¢ = 2x10 & = 2,5 m < 3m (beam centres) 121We The ra PUB 8219 shoot 7 of 18 Steel Construction Pelee Example - vont Ams Seat 7QN (DESIR af Composite Beam to ECA Telephone:(0344) 23345 Fax:(0344) 22944 DMO July 1993 ‘Checked by Date CALCULATION SHEET JWR July 1993 ssive Resistance o Cl. 4.4.1.2 0,85 Ro = fa dey X hy Ye where y, = partial safety factor for concrete = 1,5 UK NAD Sa =~ Characteristic strength of concrete or cylinder | Cl. 3.1.2 and) strength = 25 N/mm? and Table 3.1 Sey = cube strength of concrete = 30 N/mm? 0,85, fe O45 Sig Ye «Re = OAS fig X Bagy X Ihe = 0,45 x 30 x 2500 x 80/10? kN = 2700 kN ce ection, R, Cl. 4.4.1.2 R= Sax Aa = 338 x 76,1 x 10/10" kN = 2572 KN Since R, < Ry the plastic neutral axis (pna) lies in the concrete flange, | Section 4.3.1 therefore the moment resistance of the composite beam is: of Text Reha Mpera BOR |Z the thy EX F = 2572 [4064 139 _ 2872, 80 7 | 2 2700 ~ 2 = 759 kNm > Mey = 451,5kNm — -. OK Sheet 6 122Tab We The PUB 8219 Sheet 8 of 18 A Fev Steel Construction Tab Tile Institute Design Example ‘Subject Silwood Park Ascot Berks SLS 7QN Design of Composite Beam to EC4 ne CALCULATION SHEET JWR July 1993 | Shear Connector Resistance Cl. 6.3.2.1 The design shear resistance of a shear connector is: Pra = 029a0x# [GED y lor Peg = OBSg (x My, whichever is smaller Ford = 19 mm, h = 95 mm, f, = 450 Nimm?, y, = 1,25, fe = 25 Nimm? and Egy, = 30,5 kN/mm?; For definition lof symbols see Cl. 6.3.2.1 hid = 95/19 > 4 a=10 o Pag = 0,29 x 1,0 x IF (25 x 30,5/10)/1,25 = Zin or Pra = 0,8 x 450 (x x IP/A)/1,25 = 81.7 KN > 73 kN Influe ape Cl. 6.3.3.2 Deck crosses the beam (i.e. transverse) One stud per trough, i.e. N, = 1 ky = ~£26,M,) lm,) - < 10 where k, = reduction factor = 07 x 22 posis0 - 1) = 1,89 > 1,0 2. No reduction i.e. Pg = 73. KN 123Tee Nor waa |. PUB 829 sheet 9 ot 18 Toe Te Stet Contrucon —S=S Design Example Subjet Silwood Park Ascot Berks SLS 7QN Design of Composite Beam to ‘ent Wade by Bate TTelephone:(0344) 23345 Fax:(0344) 22944 DMO July 1993 Checked by = CALCULATION SHEET JWR July 1993 ‘Two studs per trough, i.e. N, When N, = 2, kk o= AZ Gy My) Mali, ) - 11 5 0.8 for N, =2 0,7 = — 5? 150/50) (95/50) - 1] om = L34> 08 Ppq = 0,8 X 73 = 58,4 kN Shear Connector Layout 36 15 at 300 = 4500 | [sso 6 studs or 32 studs a 5000 EColuma EBeam Therefore 16 troughs are available for the positioning of the shear stud connectors Longitudinal Shear Force Transfer, Ry R, (1 stud) = 16 x Ppq = 16 x 73 kN = 1168 kN R, (2 studs) = 16 x 2 x Pry = 16 x 2% 58,4KN = 1868.8 kN 124Tp No" Fav. The PUB 8219 shoot 10 ot 18 A Steel Construction ae naam car Design Example siwod Puc pow tate sis | Detlam of Composite Beam to ECA ‘Telephone:(0348) 23345 Pax (034s) 2344 DMO _| _July 1993 Thasked By Date CALCULATION SHEET JWR July 1993 Degree of Shear Connection, N/N, (one stud per trough) Minimum degree of shear connection = 0,4 for N, = 1 Cl. 6.1.2(4) N Ry. 1168 Section 4.6.4 N.4 = 0,454 (1 stud/trough) > 0,4 N;” R, ” 2572 (1 stud/trough) of Text) Moment Resistance with Partial Shear Connection Cl. 6.2.1.2(2) Moment resistance of the composite beam is obtained using the linear interaction method as follows: N Section 4.6.2 Mra = Mape.ra + Ny (Mye.ra ~ Mape.ra) of Text| where: Mepere Woe X Sa = 403,9 kNm Sheet 6 a = Degree of shear connection Ny Myera = Moment resistance based on full Sheet 7 shear connection = 759 kNm Using 1 stud per trough Mpg = — 403,9 + 0,454 (759 - 403,9) = S65,1 kNm > Mgy = 451,5kNm 2. OK Sheet 6 125Tab Wa The rar PUB 8219 sheet IL ot 18 ‘A Steel Construction << ae Te netitate = [ Desien Example smeatngtanessron [grr Den of Compose aot Be (0344) 2394 Taenbore4e) DMO July 1993 Teck BY Bais CALCULATION SHEET JWR July 1993 For this Design Example, 2 studs per trough are also considered as follows: Using 2 studs per trough [Minimum degree of shear connection = 0,25 + 0,03 X 10 = 0,55 Cl. 6.1.20) R, = 1868,8 kN Sheet 9) R Sa = 48688 _ 9797 R, 2572 i 403,9 + 0,727 (759 ~ 403,9) = 62,1 uma Studs per | Moment Resistance | Design Factored Trough based on Moment Linear Interaction (Nm) (kN) I 565,1 451,5 2 662,1 126Tob We Fev The Sas PUB 8219 Shoot 12 0¢ 18 A Steel Construction << SOT sign Kxamph Institute a saree ee steed rat Met te ss 798 (Des of Compose Beam to CA elephone:(0344) 25345 Fax:(0344) 22944 DMO July 1993 Chased By Date CALCULATION SHEET JWR July 1993 Vertical Shear Beam + slab = 2,86 x 1,35 x 10 x 3/2 57,9kN | Sheets 3 & 4 Ceiling and services = 0,5 x 1,35 x 10 x 3/2 10,1 kN Imposed load = 50x15 10x 3/2 = 112,5kN Total shear force, Veq = 180.5 kN Shear Resistance, Vye.rq Cl. 4.4.2.2 Voura 9 = where A, = h ty (as a simplification) 406,4 x 7,8 x 338 3 x 18 = 618,6 kN 9,5 Veena = 309.3 KN > Vey = 180,5 kN-. OK for all cases Cl 4.4.3 NB. With a uniformly distributed load, shear force does not influence the moment resistance of the section in this example. iceability Limit St Elastic Stresses ‘No stress checks are required for normal conditions and consequently | Sections 5.1 no limits are given in EC4, and 5.3 of| Text 127Tab We Design Example Institute ‘Subject The yar | ___ PUB 8219 shoot 13 of 18 ‘A Steel Construction << Tae Fie = Design of Composite Beam to EC4 Sitwood Park Ascot Berks SLS 7QN a Node Telephone:(0348) 23345, ae a Fax:(0344) 22944 DMO Checked by Date July 1993 CALCULATION SHEET JWR Date July 1993 Deflections Non-Compos e Deflection, 6 UDL Design load, F 2,86 kN/m? (Self weight of slab and beam) 2,86 x 10 x 3 = 85,8 kN SFL3_ _ 5 x 85,8 x (10 x 10° 384 E, Tay 384 x 210 x 21540 x 10% = 24,7 mm Composite Stage Deflection, 8, UDL = 5,0 kN/m? (Imposed) Design load, F = 5,0 x 10 x 3 = ISOKN Second moment of area of the composite section based on elastic [properties (uncracked inertia), I, , is obtained as follows: Ag (ht +2hy the? , bay X he ooo 40 +a Ra 76,1 x 10? 761 x IT — 9,038 Bay X he 2500 x 80 Modular ratio = 10 for normal wt. concrete This modular ratio is used for floor loadings with modest permanent loads. Sheet 3 Section 5.2.1 of Text Section 5.2.2 of Text 128Tab We The 2a PUB 8219 shoot 14 of 18 A Fav, Steel Construction “SSS [25 TH Institute Design Example = Sabet Design of Composite Beam to EC4 Silwood Park Ascot Berks SLS 7QN Chen Mode By Date “elephone:(0344) 23345, race ec ‘Checked by PMO ‘Date Sats 1995 CALCULATION SHEET July 1993 76,1 x 10° (406,4 +2 x 50 +80)? , 2500% 80" 1549 x 194 4(1 +10 x 0,038) Bx10 = 70x mm* Deflection with ion = SFL - 5 _x 150 x (10 x 10°) . 384 ET, 384 x 210 x 7,0 x 108 = 133mm |As partial shear connection exists, take the effect of slip into account as follows: 3 CL. $.2.2(6) Sb srto3fr-N] ey be Ny} | be Section 5.2.3 of Text 3, = I33X7x IP _ 45) 21540 x 104 6 = 13,3 [: +03 ~ 9488 [ = 13,3 x 1,37 L L = alee © OK [=] [330] EC3 Table 4.1 «. The deflection due to imposed load is satisfactory. 129TET Tov The 2a7 PUB 8219 sheet 15 ot 18 ‘A Steel Construction =X pee Institute ome Design Example seers |p Def Compene Bem BCE “Telephone: (0348) 29345 Fax0344) 22944 oue July 1993, Theaked by Oat CALCULATION SHEET JWR July 1993 Total deflection Construction Stage = 24,7 mm Imposed load = 18,2 mm Ceiling and services ~ 05 5182 = L&mm . 44,7 mm Normally, in British practice, the limit on the maximum total deflection Section 5.1 for a composite beam is w (= 50 mm) > 44,7 mm. ©. OK of Text Also, pre-cambering would not be considered for a construction stage deflection of 24,7 mm over a span of 10,0 m Transverse Reinforcement Use A142 mesh reinforcement in the slab. Cl. 6.6.2 Check resistance of concrete flange to splitting. | Shear resistance per shear surface, vpq Cl. 6.6.2(2) A ved = 25 Ayn tpg + SEH 5 0,2 Ay EH, Is Ye (neglecting contribution of decking) A, = 142 mm? in 9 = 1 for normal weight concrete cy = 105 x 10? mm? Im fy = 25 N/mm? fg = = 460 N/mm? tea = 25 X forgo.os Ye = 0,25 x 1,8/1,5 = 0,3 Table 3.1, see also Table 5| of Text % = 415 yw =411S [From Table 1 of Text] see also UK NAD 130Tae av The er PUB 8219 shoot 16 01 18 ‘A ental Sab Tie See on << ~ Design Example = Spat "Design of Composite Beam to EC4 Silwood Park Ascot Berks SLS 7QN Glen Mage by Date FTelephone:(0348) 23345 Ren DMO July 1993 hacked by Dare CALCULATION SHEET JWR July 1993 Lupe = [2sxsosx10?x10%03 G80) x10 = 135,6 kN/m 0,24,, fe = 0,2 x 105 x 10? x 10 x 25 Ye 15 x 10 = 350. kN/m > 135,6 kN/m Shear force per unit length, v Using 1 shear connector per trough, = LL KN/m < 135,6 kN/m “OK For illustration purposes, in a situation where vpq < v, @ component Jarising from the tensile strength of the deck pq is added to vpy Cl. 6.6.3 determined above. The value of vpq is obtained as follows: For profiled sheets continuous across the top flange of the steel beam, - Arty Cl. 6.6.3) Ug —2-e Yop land for profiled sheets discontinuous across the top flange of the steel beam, Section 4.8 (4 db, Pye) Cd = " A number of studs in agroup = 1 or 2 131Tab We The ae ae sheet 17 of 18 ‘A Steel Construction Ss Job Title Institute Design Example Subject Silwood Park Ascot Berks SLS 7QN Design of Composite Beam to EC4 Ghent Made by In this example, f,, = 280 Nimm’, t, = 0,9 mm A, = 1200 mm? /m, d = 19 mm and Yq) = 1,05 Ss 280 = 366,7 Nimm? 1,05 Yap , For continuous profiled decking Bey oy eer) 1,05 x 10° For discontinuous profiled decking 4x 19 x 0,9 x 266,7 0,3 x 10 60,8 kN/m mq = It may be shown that the design is adequate if the decking is discontinuous and the studs are in pairs. roach Loading Slab + beam = 2,86 KN/m? Ceiling and services = 0,50 kN/m* 10% Imposed load = 9,50 kN/m? 3,86 KN/ Total weight of floor, F = 3,86 x 10 x 3 = 115.8 kN ‘Telephone:(0344) 23345 Cane PaxsOs4s) 22944 DMO _| July 1993 ae = |CALCULATION SHEET JWR July 1993 whertpy =~ SO Yop UK NAD Section 5.4 of Text see also Ref 24 132Tab We The Se PUB 8219 shoot 18 of 18 Steel Construction = ~ OTe Institute Ss somes aston Example Sitwood Park Ascot Berks SLS 7QN cay asian of Composite Beam to BCA Telephone:(0344) 23345, amare ‘Checked by a Date July 1998 CALCULATION SHEET JWR July 1993 Increase the inertia, I., by 10% to allow stiffness of the composite beam, I. Tey Top = 7X 10° X 1,1 = 7,7 x 10° m4 Instantaneous deflection caused by re-application of the self weight of SFLI the floor and the beam to the composite beam, 5, 5 x 15,8 x (10 x 1033 384 x 210 x 7,7 x 108 = 93mm Natural frequency = 18. 18 _ sone 5 g /s, 93 The composite beam is satisfactory against vibration. Conclusion The design is strongly influenced by total deflections, rather than moment resistance or other serviceability criteria. Sor the increased dynamic 384 H, the requirements for limitation of *. OK 133APPENDIX B: Sources of information British Steel ple British Steel Sections, Plates and Commercial Steels ‘Structural Sections PO Box 24 Steel House Redcar Cleveland TS10 SQL British Steel Strip Products Commercial Office PO Box 10 Newport Gwent NP9 0XN Deck Manufacturers Precision Metal Forming Ltd ‘Swindon Road Cheltenham Gloucestershire GLS1 9LS ‘Quikspan Construction Ltd St, Clement's House St. Clement's Road Parkstone Poole Dorset BH15 3PG Richard Lees Ltd ‘Weston Underwood ‘Ashbourne Derbyshire DE6 4PH ‘Structural Metal Decks Ltd Mallard House Christchurch Road Ringwood Hampshire BH243AA Ward Building Components Sherbun Malton North Yorkshire YOI7 8PQ 134 Telephone 0642 474111 ‘Telephone 0633 290022 Telephone 0242 527511 ‘Telephone 0202 746666 Telephone 0335 60601 Telephone 0425 471088 Telephone 0944 710591‘Shear connector manufacturers TRW - Nelson Stud Welding Ltd Buckingham Road Aylesbury Buckinghamshire HP19 3QA Telephone 0296 26171 C.S.W. Coldformed Ltd. Lathkill Street Market Harborough Leicestershire LE16 9EZ Telephone 0858 410600 Hilti (GB) Lid 1 Trafford Wharf Road Manchester M17 IBY Telephone 061 872 5010 135SCI PUBLICATIONS ON EUROCODES P114 Steelwork design guide to Eurocode 3: Part 1.1 - Introducing Eurocode 3 A comparison of EC3: Part 1.1 with BS 5950: Part 1 P1165 Introduction to Concise Eurocode 3 (C-EC3) - with worked examples P116 C-EC3 - Concise Eurocode 3 for the design of steel buildings in the United Kingdom P117 Design procedures to C-EC3 P122 Worked examples for the design of steel structures (BRE/SCI/Ove Arup) For further information please contact: The Publications Department, The Steel Construction Institute, Silwood Park Ascot, Berkshire, SL5 70N Telephone (direct): 0344 872775 EUROPEAN STEEL DESIGN SOFTWARE (ESDS) The SCI, CTICM (France) and OSE Ltd. have finalised a suite of computer software which will be known as the European Steel Design Software (ESDS). This software will be modular and interlinked, with emphasis on a common user-friendly graphical interface. The software will run on standard 18M compatible microcomputers with links to drafting packages. The software will cover first-order elastic analysis, second-order plastic analysis, simple and moment connection design, and detailed structural design checks to both BS 5950: Part 1 and EC3. For further information please contact: The Computing Department, The Steel Construction Institute, Silwood Park, Ascot, Berkshire, SL5 70N. Telephone: 0344 23345 Fax: 0344 22944SCI-P-121 COMPOSITE BEAM DESIGN TO EUROCODE 4 Erratum Page 39 Section 7.4.2, third line: The required spacing of secondary beams (L > 9 m), The word “secondary” must be replaced with “primary” Page 45 Notes on Tables, under “Symbols’fourth line: L Maximum spacing (m) of secondary beams The word “secondary” must be replaced with “primary” Note: L is defined correctly in Tables 29 to 64SCI-P-121 : Composite Beam Design to Eurocode 4