COURSE SYLLABUS IN PERSONS AND FAMILY RELATIONS(*): (Prepared by Judge Cynthia Martinez Florendo) Objectives: (1). To have the students familiarize themselves with the provisions of the laws relative to persons and family relations (2) To have the students understand the tenets of laws through jurisprudence. a, To let students digest cases and for them to be able to cite the law of the case and recite them in class b. To let them write their digested cases in a composition notebook for them to be able to practice writing and eventually have legible handwriting. PERSONS (To be taught in a two week period) I. Introduction a, Distinction between civil law and common law b. Civil Code of the Philippines ( Act Number; Effectivity) c. Family Code of the Philippines (Act Number; Effectivity) IL. Effect and Application of Laws; Binding effects of laws (Articles 1-18) Effectivity of laws CC Art 2 Carbonell vs. Court of Appeals (69 SCRA 99} 1544 CC ‘Tanada vs. Tuvera (136 SCRA 27) Ignorance of the law CCA 3 KAsILAG Vs. RODRIGUEZ, 69 PHIL 217 Elegado v. Court of Appeals, 173 SCRA 285 Retroactivity of laws CCArt 4, cf. CC 2252 - 2269 Revised Penal Code (RPC) 22 Family Code (FC) 255 Frivaldo vs. Comelec, G.R. No, 120295, June 28, 1996 Gregorio vs. CA, G-R. No. L-22802, Nov. 29, 1968 Aruego vs CA, 254 SCRA 711 Cang vs CA, 296 SCRA 128 Francisco vs CA, 299 SCRA 188 Mandatory or Proibitory Laws CC Art. 5 with CC Art. 17 (3) Waiver of rights cart. 6 NCC Art. 2035 PEFTOK Integrated Services vs. NLRC, G.R. No. 124841. July 31, 1998 Valderama vs. Macalde, 470 SCRA 168 DM Consunji vs. CA, G-R. No. 137873, April 20, 2001 Repeal of laws CC Art 7 cf. 1987 Constitution, Art. XVIII Sec. 3 Mecano vs. COA, G.R. No. 103982, Dec. 11, 1992 Solangon vs. Salazar, G.R. No. 125944, June 29, 2001 ‘Thornton vs. Thornton, Aug. 16, 2004 Judicial Decisions cc arts De Roy vs. CA, 157 SCRA 757 Pesca vs. Pesca, G.R. No. 136921. April 17, 2001Duty to render judgment CC Art 9 RPC Art § Presumption and Applicability of custom CC Arts 10 - 12 cf. 1987 Constit Rules of Court Martinez v. Van Buskirk, 18 Phil. 79 Alonzo vs Padua, 150 SCRA 379 Legal periods cc art 13 cf. Rules of Court (ROC) Rule 22 RAC Sec. 31 ‘Armigos v. CA 179 SCRA 1 Namareo v. Tecson 29 SCRA 70 Go v. Dizon 214 SCRA 41 [See Concurring Opinion, J. Regalado] Quiqui v. Boncaros, 151 SCRA 416 Applicability of Penal laws CC art 14 Binding effect CC art 15 cf. FC 26 par. 2 Barreto v. Gonzales 58 Phil 67 ‘Tenchavez v. Escafio 15 SCRA 355 Board of Commissioners vs. de la Rama, 197 SCRA 853 CC Art 16 CC art 17 German vs. Donaldson, 1 Phil 63 CC Art 18) Doctrines and concepts: Territoriality Rule (Perkins vs. Dizon, 69 Nationality Rule (Tenchavez ys. Escano, Domiciliary Theory (Koh vs. Court of Appeals} Renvoi Doctrine; Transmission Theory (Aznar vs. Garcia,7 SCRA 95) eee ge (Germna & Co. vs. Donaldson, Sim & Co., Phil Scra 63) Sep ge is Eclectic Theory (Application of the lex situs principle in every element of a crime) Ill, Human Relations (Articles. 13-36) a. The Golden Rule in Law b. Rule on Unjust Enrichment NCC 19 - 22 People v. Ritter 194 SCRA 690 De Tavera vs. Philippine Tuberculosis Society, 112 SCRA 243 Liorente vs. Sandiganbayan, 287 SCRA 382 2Carpio vs. Valmonte, G.R. No. 151866, Sept. 9, 2004 Nikko Hotel Manila Garden vs. Reyes, G.R. No. 154259. Feb. 28, 2005. ¢. Liability For Fault or Negligence d. Dependent and Independent Civil Actions €. Pre-judicial Question IV. Civil personality a. General Provisions (Articles 37-39) b. Natural Persons (Articles 40-43) Commencement and termination of personality 1, Natural Persons (a) Birth CC Arts 40 - 41 1987 Constitution, Art. II Sec. 12 P.D. 603 [Child and Youth Welfare Code], Art. 5 FC 164 RPC Arts. 256 - 259 Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S, 113, 93 S.Ct. 705, 35 Led. 2d 147 Geluz v. CA 2 SCRA 801 Quimiging v. Icao 34 SCRA 134 De Jesus v. Syquia 58 Phil 866 Continental Steel vs. Montano, GR 182836, October 13, 2009 (b) Death CC art 42 Limjoco v. Intestate Estate of Pio Fragante 80 Phil 776 Dumiao v. Quality Plastics 70 SCRA 472 Bugenio v. Velez 185 SCRA 425 Marcos v. Manglapus, G.R. No. 88211, Oct. 27, 1989 CC Art 43 ROC Rule 131 Sec. 3 i) - (kk) (1989 Rev. Rules on Evidence) Joaquin v. Navarro 93 Phil 257 ¢. Juridical Persons (Articles 44-47) ‘Juridical capacity Natural persons (Roldan vs. Phil. Veterans Board, 105 Phil. 1081) Provisional Personality Juridical persons Capacity to Act Effects of Incapacity Cessation of Civil Personality Presumption of Survivorship Batas Pambansa Big. 68 (Corp. Code), Secs. 2, 4, 17 NCC 1767-1768 Barlin v. Ramirez 7 Phil 41 Camid vs. Office of the President, G.R. No. 161414. Jan. 17, 2005 Juasing vs Hardware, July 30, 1982 Restrictions on civil capacity 1. Presumption of capacity Catalan vs. Basa, G.R. No, 159567, July 31, 2007 2. Restrictions on capacity to act CC Art 38 - 39, ef. NCC 1327 3(a) Minority 1. Age of majority, R.A. 6809 2. A.M. NO. 03-02-05-SC Rules on Guardianship 3. ‘Suffrage, Sec. 1 Art. V 1987 Constitution [cf. Sangguniang Kabataan] Marriage, FC 5; cf. R.A. 6809 Contracts ve CC Art 1327 CC Art 1390 (par. 1), 1403 (par. 3) CC Arts 1397, 1399 CC art1489 CC arts1426 - 1427 Mercado v. Espiritu 37 Phil 215 Bambalan v. Maramba $1 Phil 417 Suan Chian v. Alcantara 85 Phil 669 Braganza v. Villa-Abrille 105 Phil 456 Also see: Rule 3, Section 5 1997 Rules of Civil Proceduze (c} Insanity 1, Marriage, FC Art 45 (2) 2. Contracts, CC Art. 1327, 1328 3. Criminal liability, RPC 12 (1) Rule 101, Rules of Court US v. Vaguilar, 27 Phil 88 People v. Rafanan 204 SCRA 65 Standard Oil v. Arenas, supra Hernandez vs Santos, G.R. No. 169217, August 7, 2009 (c) Deaf-Mutism, CC Arts 1327 (2), 807 & 820 (d) Prodigality, ' ROC Rule 92 Sec. 2 RPC 31, 41 () Family Relations FC 150-151; cf. FC 87 CC Art 1490 CC Art 2035 cf. CC Arts 963-967 (g) Alienage, cf. Art. IV, Secs. 1-5, 1987 Constitution Corodora vs COMELEC, February 19, 2009 (h) Absence, CC Art 381 - 396 (i) Insolvency and Trusteeship, CC Arts 1381, 1491, 2236 Villanueva vs. CA, G.R. No. 114870, May 26, 1995. @ Gender, Art. Il, Sec. 14, 1987 Constitution; cf. NCC 403 ‘See also: Rule 3 Section 4, 1997 Rules of Civil Procedure V. Citizenship and Domicile (Articles 48-51) 4a. Distinction between domicile and residence , Citizenship (Article IV of the 1987 Constitution) Jus sanguinis; Jus soli 1, Juridical persons, CC Art 51 2, Natural persons CC Art 50 FC 68-69, cf. NCC 110 ef. FC 55, 101, 149, 152, 101 Romualdez-Marcos vs COMELEC, 248 SCRA 300 FAMILY RELATIONS (Family Code of the Philippines) References: Persons and Family Relations by Jurado; by Tolentino; by Vitug; by Sta. Maria and by Sempio-Diy. Osmena v Osmena, G.R. No. 171911, January 26, 2010 A. Effect and Retroactivity E.0. 29, as amended by E.0. 227, R.A. 8609, R.A. 7160 FC 255, cf. FC 36 in rel. to 39, FC 105, FC 162, FC 257 Lupo Atienza v. Judge Brilliantes, 243 SCRA 32 Bernabe vs. Alejo, 374 SCRA 180 B. Repeal/Amendment FC 253, 255, 1. Marriage ‘A. The concept of FC 1 of. CC 52, FC 149 Art Il Sec. 12, 1987 Constitution Art. XV Sec. 2, 1987 Constitution Estrada v Escritor, A.M. No. P-02-1651. August 4, 2003 B. Nature of marriage in Philippine law FC 1 cf. Rule 131 Sec. 3, 1989 Rules on Evidence, NCC 220 Muslim Code, (P.D. 1083) Sec. 14 Goitia vs Campos-Rueda, 35 Phils 252 Go vs. Court of Appeals 272 SCRA 752 Silverio vs Republic, October 22, 2007 ‘Amores v CSC, G.R. No. 170093, April 29, 2009 People v De La Cruz, G.R. No.187683, February 11, 2010 People v Poras, G.R. No. 177747, February 16, 2010 C. Agreements prior to marriage 1. Stipulations prior to marriage FC Lef. CC 221 Panganiban v. Borromeo $8 Phil 367 In re Santiago 70 Phil 66 Selanova v. Mendoza 64 SCRA 69 Lichauco-de Leon v. CA 186 SCRA 345, 2, Breach of promise to marry 5‘Tanjanco v. CA 18 SCRA 994 Baksh v. CA, 219 SCRA 115 D. Requisites for a valid marriage 1 Tolentino 222 - 269 Mariategui v. CA 205 SCRA 337 1. Kinds of requisites & effects of non-compliance FC 2-3; FC 5; FC 45 ef. CC53 RPC 350-351 De Mijares vs Villaluz, 274 SCRA 1 Mallion vs Alcantara, 506 SCRA 336 2. Essential requisites (a) Legal Capacity 1. Gender, FC 2 ( 1) cf. FC 148 Silverio vs Republic, October 22, 2007 2. Age FC 5; FC 35 (1); RA. 6809 cf. FC 21 NCC 54 & RPC 344 cf. DOJ Opinion 145 8.1991 (Oct. 1991) 3. Absence of impediment, FC 5 Garcia vs. Recio, 365 SCRA 437 Te vs. Choa, G.R. No. 126446, Nov. 29, 2000 (346 SCRA 327) 4, Parental consent, FC 14; FC 45 cf. CC 61 & 95 (1) Villanueva vs CA, 505 Scra 564 (b) Consent freely given by both spouses 1. Mistake as to identity, FC 35 (5); CC 86 (1) 2. Effect of insanity, FC 45 3. Effect of fraud, FC 45 (3); FC 46, NCC 1338 - 1344 ‘Anaya vs Palaroan, Nov. 26, 1970 4. Effect of force, intimidation and undue influence, FC 45 (4); CO 1335 - 1337 5. Bifect of physical incapac Jimenez v. Cafiizares 109 Phi GR. No. 174451, October 13, 2009 ‘/impotence, FC 45 (5) 7 6. Effect of affliction with STD, FC 45 (6) 5. Formal Requisites (a) Marriage license Republic v. CA, 236 SCRA 257 6Cosca v. Palaypayan, 237 SCRA 249 Sy vs. CA, G.R. No. 127263, April 12, 2000 Alcantara vs. Alcantara, G.R. No. 167746, Aug. 28, 2007 De Castro v De Castro, G.R. No. 160172, February 13, 2008 Republic v Dayot, G.R. No. 175581, March 28, 2008 1. Where to apply, FC.9 - 10 2. Requirements for issuance ‘a. application, FC 11 b. proof of capacity, FC 12-14; FC 21 cf. CC 84 Sevilla vs Cardenas, 497 SCRA 429 cf. DOJ Opinion 50 S. 1991 (April 30, 1991) DOJ Opinion 146 S. 1991 (Oct. 17, 1991) . parental advice, FC 15 4. marriage counseling, FC 16 . publication, FC 17 f. investigation of impediments, FC 18 8. payment of fees, FC 19 hh. family planning certificate, P.D. 965 3. Place where valid, FC 20 4. Period of validity, FC 20 Duties of the Civil Registrar, FC 24-25 Alcantara vs Alcantara, GR No. 167746, Aug. 28, 2007 5, marriages exempt from license requirement FC 27-34, cf. NCC 76, P.D. 1083 Leda v. Tabang, 205 SCRA 395 Ninal vs, Bayadog, G.R. 133778, Mar. 14, 2000 Manzano vs, Judge Sanchez, A.M. No, MTJ-00-1329, March 8, 2001 De Castro vs. De Castro, G.R. 160172, February 13, 2008 Republic vs Dayot, March 28, 2008 (b) Authority of the solemnizing officer 1, Who are authorized FC7, 10, 31 & 32 CC 56, 74, 76 R.A. 7160 (1991 Local Government Code], Aranes vs Occiano, 380 SCRA 402 Navarro v. Domagtoy S.C. A.M. MTJ-96-1088, July 19, 1996 2, How authorized FC7 (2) cf. NCC 92-96 Villar v. Paraiso 96 Phil 659 3. Effect of absence of authority FC 4; FC 35 (2) RPC 352 cf. Tenchavez v. Escaito, 15 SCRA 355 at page 360 4. Duties of the solemnizing officer, FC 23-24 5. Bffect of irregularity, FC 4 (©) Marriage Ceremony 1, form of ceremony, FC 3 (3); FC 6 cf. FC 33, FC 8Martinez v. Tan 12 Phil 731 2. Place for ceremony, FC 8; FC 28-29; FC 32-33 3. Issuance of marriage certificate, FC 6; 7C 22 Madridejo v. De Leon 55 Phil 1 People v. Borromeo 133 SCRA 106 E. Law governing validity of marriages abroad 1 Tolentino 260 - 263 1. General rule in contracts (a) As to form, NCC 17 (b) As to substantive requirements, NCC 15 & 17 2. Special rule in marriage (a) lex loci celebrationis, FC 26; FC 21, FC 10 Yao Kee v. Sy-Gonzales, 167 SCRA 786 Republic vs. Orbecido Il, G.R. No. 154380, October 5, 2005 (b) Exceptions, FC 26 in relation to FC 35(1), 35(4), 35(5), 36, 37 & 38, cf. NCC DOJ Opinion No. 11 S. 1990 (Jan, 17, 1990) F, Common-law marriages/ ‘live-in’ relationships FC 147, ef. RPC 350 Rule 131 Sec. 3, 1989 Rules on Evidence ef.NCC 220 Lesaca v. Lesaca, 91 Phil 135 Yaptinchay v. Torres, 28 SCRA 489 Eugenio v. Velez, supra Estrada v Escritor, A.M. No. P-02-1651. August 4, 2003 G. Void Marriages 1 Tolentino 270 - 310 General rule, FC 4 1. Kinds of void marriages (a) Absence of requisites cf. VI (D) of Outline FC 35 cf. FC 234, RA 6809 Alcantara v Mallion, GR NO. 1677446, August 18, 2007 De Castro v De Castro, G.R. No. 160172, February 13, 2008 So vs Valera, GR 150677, June 5, 2009 (0) Bigamous and polygamous marriages, FC 35(4), 39, 40, 41, 44 RPC 344, 349 Apiag v. Cantero S.C. A.M. MTJ-95-1070, Feb. 12, 1997 Mercado vs Tan, 337 SCRA 122 ‘ty vs. CA, G.R. No.127406, Nov. 27, 2000 Morigo vs Morigo, 422 SCRATenebro vs. CA, G.R. No. 150758. February 18, 2004 (read concurring of Justice Vitug) Mallion vs Alcantara, 506 SCRA 336 (c) Subsequent marriage, upon reappearance of absent spouse FC 41 in relation to FC 42-44 NCC 390-391, FC 55 (9), FC 101 Jones v. Hortiguela 64 Phil 179 Republic vs. Nolasco, 220 SCRA 20, March 17, 1993 Bienvenido vs. Court of Appeals, 237 SCRA 676, October 24, 1994 Armas vs. Calisterio, 330 SCRA 201, April 6, 2000 Republic vs. Bermudez - Lorino, 449 SCRA 57, January 19, 2005 Republic vs. Court of Appeals, 458 SCRA 200, May 6, 2005 Manuel vs. People, 476 SCRA 461, November 26, 2005 Republic vs. Court of Appeals, 477 SCRA 277, December 9, 2005 Republic vs Tango, July 31, 2009 Bad faith of both spouses, under FC 44 (e) Psychological incapacity under FC 36 FC 36, 39, 68-73 RA. 8533 Lim v. CA 214 SCRA 237 Salita v. Magtolis, 233 SCRA 100 Krohn v. CA, 233 SCRA 146 Santos v. CA 240 SCRA 20 Chi Ming Tsoi v. CA G.R. No. 119190, Jan. 16, 1997 Republic v. Olaviano Molina (1997) Hernandez vs. Court of Appeals, 320 SCRA 76, December 08, 1999 Marcos vs. Marcos, 343 SCRA 755, October 19, 2000 Republic vs. Dagdag, 351 SCRA 425 Malcampo-Sin vs. Sin, 355 SCRA 285, March 26, 2001 Pesca vs. Pesca, 356 SCRA 588, April 17, 2001 Republic vs. Tanyag-San Jose, 517 SCRA 123, February 6, 2007 Zamora vs. Court of Appeals, February 7, 2007 Navarro vs. Navarro, GR No. 162049, April 13, 2007 Republic vs Cabantug-Baguio, June 30, 2008 Almelor vs RTC-Las Pinas, GR No. 179620, Aug. 26, 2008 Laurena vs CA, GR No. 159220, Sept. 22, 2008 Te vs Te, GR No. 161793, Feb. 13, 2009 Ting vs Ting, GR 166562, March 31, 2009 Azcueta us RP, G.R. No. 180668, May 26, 2009 So us Valera, GR 150677, June 5, 2009 Halili v Halili, GR 165424, June 9, 2009 (Motion for Recon) Najera vs Najera, GR 164817, July 3, 2009 Rumbaua vs Rumbaua, GR 166738, August 14, 2009 Aspillaga vs Aspillaga, GR 170925, October 26, 2009 Lim v Lim, G.R. No. 174464, February 4, 2010 Paz v Paz, G.R. No. 166579, February 18, 201 () Incestuous marriages, FC 37 ef. NCC 963-967 (@) Marriages against public policy FC 38, compare FC 38(6} with NCC 80(6) RPC 246 NCC 80(7), 82 NCC 963-967Reyes us Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 124099. October 30, 1997 (h) Non-compliance under FC 53 2. Who can invoke nu! Sec. 2, A.M. No. 02-11 FC 36, FC 39, FC 40 .C. March 4, 2003 Nifal vs. Bayadog, G.R. 133778, Mar. 14, 2000 Enrico vs. Heirs of Sps. Medinaceli, G.R. No. 173614, September 28, 2007 Carlos s. Sandoval, GR 179922, December 16, 2008 3. When to file action for declaration of nullity FC 39; FC 36 par. 2 in relation to FC 255; FC 42, par. 2 FC 237 in rel to R.A. 6809 4, Procedure in actions for declaration of nullity a. Requisite for valid remarriage, see VII (E)(10)(b) above b. Safeguards against collusion, FC 48 Malcampo Sin vs. Sin, 355 SCRA 285 ‘Ancheta vs Ancheta, 424 SCRA 725 d. No confession of judgment, FC 48; cf. NCC 2035 A.M, No. 02-11-10-SC. March 4, 2003 Jocson v. Robles 22 SCRA 521 Tolentino v. Villanueva 56 SCRA 1 Salcedo-Ortanez v. CA 235 SCRA 111 Pesca vs. Pesca 356 SCRA 588 Carlos us Sandoval, December 16, 2008 5. Biffects of pendency of action for declaration of nullity - Art. 49 6. Effects of final judgment declaring nullity (a) In general, FC 50-54 but see FC 147-148 (b) On remarriage, FC 40 Wiegel v. Sempio-Diy, 143 SCRA 499 Terre v. Terre, 211 SCRA 6 Domingo v. CA 226 SCRA 572 Carifio vs. Carifio 351 SCRA 127 Bobis vs. Bobis, G.R. No, 138509, July 31, 2000 Mercado vs.Tan, G.R. No 137110, August 1, 2000 Ty vs CA, 346 SCRA 327 Morigo vs Morigo, 422 SCRA 376 Abunado v People, G.R. No. 159218, March 30, 2004 Jarillo vs People, September 29, 2009 (c)_ On rights & obligations between the former spouses (a) On the property regime of the marriage FC 50, FC 43(2) ef. FC 102(4) Compare with FC 147-148 Valdes v. QC-RTC G.R. No. 122749, July 31, 1996 Sales vs Sales, GR 17483, July 13, 2009 10(¢) On ‘egitimes' of the common children FC 50-53, FC 51 in rel to NCC 886, 888; FC 176 NCC 908, 1061 Sec. 21, A.M. No. 02-11-10-SC. March 4, 2003 (On the status and custody of children FC Art. 54, Art. 176 Dacasin v Dacasin, G.R. No. 168785, February 5, 2010 (g) On use of surnames Yasin vs The Honorable Judge Shari'a District Court, G.R, 'No.94986 February 23, 1995 BAR MATTER NO, 1625 - Petition to Use Maiden Name in Petition to Take the 2006 Bar Examinations, JOSEPHINE P, UY-TIMOSA (h) On hereditary rights ¢. Void and Voidabie Marriages (Arts. 35-54) THE LAW ON SEPARATION OF THE SPOUSES ‘A. Concepts of separation & divorce Benedicto v. De la Rama 3 Phil 34 1, Separation in fact, FC 238-248 2. Agreements to separate NCC 221 (1) Albano v. Gapusan 71 SCRA 26 In re: Atty. Rufillo Bucena 72 SCRA 14 3. Absolute divorce (a) Divorce under the Family Code FC 26 paragraph 2 15 SCRA 355 139 SCRA 139 4 SCRA 663 Dacasin v Dacasin, G.R. No. 168785, February 5, 2010 (0) Divorce under the Muslim Code, MC 45-55 B. Concept of legal separation, compare with NCC 97 1, Grounds for legal separation ~ Art. 55, FC AM, No, 02-11-11-SC. March 4, 2003 (a) Sexual infidelity or perversion FC 55(8) RPC 333 & 334 RPC 247 Goitia v. Campos-Rueda 35 Phil 252 uPeople v. Zapanta 88 Phil 688 Gandionco v. Pefiaranda 155 SCRA 725 ‘Ong vs Ong, 505 SCRA 76 (b) Drug addiction, habitual alcoholism, lesbianism or homosexuality FCC 55 compare with FC 46(4) (c) Attempt on the life of the other spouse FC 55(9), compare with NCC 97(2) (d) Abandonment FC Art. 55 (10) FC 101 par. 3, compare with separation in fact (€) other grounds 2, Who can ask for legal separation FC 55, compare with NCC 99 3. When may petition be filed FC 57, compare with NCC 102, NCC 99 Lapuz v. Bufemio 43 SCRA 177 Matubis v. Praxedes 109 Phil 789 4. Court procedure in legal separation FC 58-60; Sec 19, RA 9262 A.M. No. 02-11-11-SC. March 4, 2003 Araneta vs Concepcion, 99 Phil 709 Ocampo v Florenciano, 107 Phil 35, Lapuz vs Eufemio, 43 SCRA 177 Samosa vs Vamenta, Jr., 46 SCRA 110 Pacete v. Cariaga 231 SCRA 321 5. Effect of pendency of the petition (a) cooling-off period, FC 58 (b) right of consortium, FC 61 par. 1 (c) administration of property, FC 61 par. 2 De la Vifia v. Villareal 41 Phil 13 Sabalones v. CA 230 SCRA 79 (@) Support and custody pendente lite FC 62 cf. FC 49, FC 198 Yangco v. Rhode, 1 Phil 404 De la Vifia v. Villareal, supra Araneta v. Concepcion 99 Phil 709 Ramos v. Vamenta 46 SCRA 110 Lerma v. CA 61 SCRA 440 Pacete v. Cariaga supra 6. Defenses in actions for legal separation (a) ConsentFC 56(2); NCC 100 Matubis v. Praxedes, supra People v. Sansano 50 Phil 73. People v. Schneckenberger 73 Phil 413 (b) Condonation FC 56(1) Ginez v. Bugayong 100 Phil 616 (c) Recrimination FC 56(4) Brown v. Yambao 102 Phil 168 Arroyo v. CA 203 SCRA 753 (4) Collusion/Mutual Consent FC 60 FC 56(3), (5), compare with NCC 101 and 221(3) Brown v. Yambeo, supra ‘Ocampo v. Florenciano 107 Phil 35, 7. Effects of decree of legal separation (a) On personal relations, FC 63 (b) On the custody of children P.D. 603 (CYWC) Art. 17 par. 3 Matute v. Macadaeg 99 Phil 340 (c) On property relations FC 63(2), FC 64, FC Art. 102 (4) (a) On support, FC 198 (e) On the use of surname Nec 370-372 Laperal v. Republic 116 Phil 672 (9 On hereditary rights, FC 63(4) (@) Solo Parents Act ~ RA 8972 8. Reconciliation, FC 65-67 9. Effect of death of one of the parties Lapuz vs. Bufemio 43 SCRA 314 Macadangdang vs. CA 108 SCRA 314 UL Rights and Obligations Between Husband and Wife (Arts. 68-73) RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS OF SPOUSES. cf, NCC 113-114 A. Obligation to love each other, FC 68 B. Obligation to live with the other spouse 1. General rule and exceptions 13Goitia v. Campos-Rueda, supra Arroyo v. Vasques-Arroyo 42 Phil 54 Cuaderno v. Cuaderno 12 SCRA 505 Lacson v. Lacson 24 SCRA 837 Iusorio vs. Bildner, G.R. No. 139789. May 12, 2000, 2. Designation of domicile (a) General rule: jointly FC 69 par. 1, compare with NCC 110 Abella v. COMELEC, 201 SCRA 335 Dela Vita v. Villareal, supra at pp. 16-21 {b) Exception, FC 69 par. 2 CC, Joint management of family life FC 70-71 D. Joint Obligation to Support SSS v De los Santos, G.R. No. 164790, August 29, 2008 E. The right to exercise a profession or calling FC 73, compare with NCC 117 FC Art, 94 (3); FC Art. 1 Art. II Sec. 14 and Art. XIII Sec. 14, 1987 Constitution cf. NCC 113 compare with ROC Rule 3 Sec. 4 cf. RA. 7192, “An Act Promoting the Integration of Women as Full & Equal Partners of Men in Development and Nation Building” cf. R.A. 8187, “An Act Granting Paternity Leave...” E. Related rights/obligations Yasin v. Shariah Court 241 SCRA (1995) D, Enforcement of Rights of Women and Children Republic Act No. 9262 - Anti-Violence Against Women and Children Sharica Mari Go Tan vs Spouses Tan, GR No. 168852, Sept. 30, 2008 People v Ayude, G.R. No. 188561, January 15, 2010 IV. Property Relations Between Husband and Wife Pepoge Pe General Provisions (Arts. 74- 81) Donations by Reason of Marriage (Arts. 82-87) System of Absolute Community (Arts. 88 ~ 104) Conjugal Partnership of Gains (Arts. 105-115) Conjugal Partnership Property (Arts. 116 - 133) ‘Separation of Property of the Spouses and Administration of Common Property by One Spouse During the Marriage (Arts. 134 — 142) Regime of Separation of Property (Arts. 143-146) . Property Regimes of Unions Without Marriage (Arts. 144, 147 and 148) 14‘A. Requisites for validity of marriage settlements FC Art. 75; 130 (3); 103 (3) NCC Art. 1709; 1358 1. Prior to marriage: modifications FC 1; FC76 (modifications after marriage) FC 66, 67, 128, 135, 136 2, Form & registration requirement, FC77 3. Celebration of the marriage, FC 81 cf. Art. 86 (1) B. Parties to a marriage settlement 1, Who may enter into settlements (a) minors, FC 78 persons under civil interdiction, FC Art. 38, 79 (c) incapacitated persons, FC 79, in rel. to NCC 38-39 2. Participation of parents/guardians 3. C. Which law governs property relations 1, Stipulation in marriage settlements, FC 80 2. If both Filipinos 3. Mixed marriage between Filipino and alien 4. If both aliens 5. For property located outside RP ) and (3) in rel. To NCC 16 rel. To NCC 17, D. Donations propter nuptias 1. Definition, FC 82 Solis vs Solis, 53 Phil 912 [1928] 2. Form of Donations, FC Art. 83, NCC Arts. 748-749 3. Who may be donors 4. What may be donated by a spouse as donor resent property, FC 84 future property, FC 84; NCC 761 numbered property, FC 85 lonations in the marriage settlements, FC 81 5. Void donations by the spouses, FC 87 (a) Donations during the marriage (b) Donations in common law marriages Matabuena v. Cervantes 38 SCRA 284 Bienvenido v. Court of Appeals, 237 SCRA 676 ‘Sumbad vs CA, 308 CRA 575, Arcaba vs. Tabancura vs. de Batocael, G.R. No. 146683. Nov. 22, 2001 ‘SSS v Davac, G.R. No. L-21642. July 30, 1966 6. Revocation of donations propter nuptias 15(a) revocation by donor, FC 86; NCC 765; FC Art. 50; 43 (3) Mateo vs Lagua, 29 SCRA 864 (b) by operation of law, FC 48; 44; 61 E, Absolute community of property (ACP) When applicable, FC 78, 103 (3); 130 (3) . Commencement, FC 88 . Waiver during marriage, FC 89 4, Waiver after marriage, FC 89 par. 2 cf NCC Art. 168 . Suppletory rules: Co-ownership, FC 90; of NCC 484-501 6. What constitutes ACP, FC 91 Memorize! (a) all property at time of marriage (b) property acquired subsequently winnings from gambling, FC as of NCC 164 presumption of ACP, FC 93 of NCC 160 7. What is excluded from ACP, FC 92; FC 95 8. Charges upon ACP, FC 94 Luzon Surety Co., Inc. vs De Garcia, 30 SCRA 111 Gelano vs CA, 103 SCRA 90 ‘Sunga-Chan v CA, G.R. No. 164401, June 25, 2008 Buado vs. CA, G.R. No. 145222, April 24, 2009 (@) family expenses, cf. FC 100 (3), FC 121(5) and FC 94(4) Francisco v Gonzales, G.R. No. 177667, September 17, 2008 debts of spouse subsidiary liabilities sole obligations of a spouse gambling losses, FC 95 (9 other charges 9. Ownership, FC 90, FC 96 in rel. to NCC 206 10. Administration and enjoyment of ACP. (a) joint administration, FC 96; FC 90 ‘Yu Bun Guan vs Ong, 36 SCRA 559 (b} Sole administration incapacity, FC 96 separation in fact FC 100 (3) FC Art. 100 (2) abandonment, FC 101 pendency of legal separation proceeding, FC 61 (c) Disposition and encumbrance, FC 96-98 Matthews vs. Taylor, GR 164584, June 22, 2009 1611, Bffect of separation de facto, FC 100; cf. FC 239 12, Effect of abandonment, FC 101, FC 72 13, Causes for dissolution of ACP, FC 99 Death, FC 103 cf. Rule 73 Sec. 12 ROC Legal separation, FC 63(2); FC 66 FC 50 in rel. to FC 43 (2) ial separation of property, FC 134-138 14, Effects of dissolution Liquidation procedure, FC 102 For cause other than death, FC 43 (2); FC 63(2) ‘Termination due to death, FC 104 15. For marriages before FC, FC 104 ef Art. 103 (3) Delizo v. Delizo, 69 SCRA 216 16. Support during ACP liquidation F. Conjugal partnership of gains Belcodero v. CA 227 SCRA 303 Jocson v. CA 170 SCRA 333 Ansaldo v. Sheriff, 64 Phil 115, Sps. Estonina v. CA G.R. No. 111547, Jan. 27, 1997 1, When CPG commences and applies (a) marriages under FC, FC 107 cf. FC 88, FC 89 (a) marriages before FC, FC 105(2) of FC 256 Castro vs. Miat, 397 SCRA 271 (b) when applicable, FC 105 of FC 74-74 Malang vs Moson, 338 SCRA 393 (4) suppletory rules, FC 108 cf. NCC 1767-1768 PNB v. Quintos, 46 Phil 370 Ansaldo vs Sheriff of Manila, 64 Phil 115 2. What is excluded from CPG (2) brought as exclusive property, FC 109(1) Laperal v. Katigbak, 10 SCRA 493 (b) acquired by gratuitous title during marriage, FC 109 (2) of FC 113, FC 115 Veloso v. Martinez, 28 Phil 255, Berciles v. GSIS,128 SCRA 53, cf. FC 115 (c) acquired by redemption /exchange, FC 109(3) Plata v. Yatco, 12 SCRA 718 Lim v. Garcia, 7 Phil 320 (d) purchased with exclusive money FC 109(4); of FC 118-119 17(e) properties of parents Laurena us CA, GR 159220, September 22, 2008 3. Administration of exclusive property ) by the spouse-owner, FC 110 vy the other spouse, FC 110 2nd par; FC 142, FC 75, Veloso v. Martinez, supra Manotok Realty v. CA, 149 SCRA 372 Ong vs CA, 204 SCRA 297 4, Encumbrance/disposition of exclusive property FC 111-112, of FC 236, amended by RA 6809 Palanca v. Smith-Bell, 9 Phil 131 Lim Queco v. Cartagena, 71 Phil 163 Wong et al. v. IAC 200 SCRA 792 5. What constitutes CPG Torela v. Torela, 93 SCRA 391 ‘Magallon v. Montejo, 146 SCRA 282 Cuenca v. Cuenca, 168 SCRA 335 ()_ what are included in CPG, FC 117 Memorize! Cheesman vs IAC, 193 SCRA 93 Villanueva vs CA, 427 SCRA 439 Zulueta v. Pan-Am 49 SCRA 1 ‘Mendoza v. Reyes 124 SCRA 154 De Leon us De Leon, GR 185063, July 23, 2009 (a) if property bought by installments, FC Art. 118 Under NCC: Castillo v. Pasco, 11 SCRA 102 Tarrosa vs. De Leon, GR 185063, July 23, 2009 {e) credits due, FC 119 (8 improvements on CPG property, FC 120 Padilla vs Padilla, 74 Phil 377 Caltex vs Felias, 108 Phil 873 ‘Vda de Padilla vs PAterno, 3 SCRA 678 Calimlim v. Fortun, 129 SCRA 675 Maramba v. Lozano, 20 SCRA 474 Embrado v. CA, 233 SCRA 335 Ravina vs Villa-Abrille, supra 6. Charges upon and obligations of CPG, FC 121, 122 Mariano vs CA, 174 SCRA 59 Ayala vs CA, 286 SCRA 272 Ching vs CA, 423 SCRA 356Homeowners Savings and Loan us. Dailo, G.R. No. 153802, Mar.11, 2005 Sunga-Chan v CA, G.R. No. 164401, June 25, 2008 Buado vs. CA, G.R. No. 145222, April 24, 2009 (a) with consent Javier v. Osmefia, 34 Phil 336 ‘Vda. De Sta. Romana v. PCIB, 118 SCRA 330 G-Tractors v. CA, 135 SCRA 192 DBP v. Adil, 161 SCRA 307 Mariano v. CA 174 SCRA 59 Wong et al. v. CA 200 SCRA 792 Ong v. CA 204 SCRA 297 Ayala Investment vs. CA (February 12, 1998) Security Bank vs. Mar Tiera Corp., G.R. No. 143382, Nov. 29, 2006 {b) without consent Luzon Surety v. De Garcia, 30 SCRA 118 BA Finance v. CA, 161 SCRA 608 Costuna vs. Domondon, 180 SCRA 333 Carlos vs. Abelardo, 380 SCRA 361 Ramones vs. Agbayani, 137808, Sept. 30, 2005 Villanueva vs Chiong, GR 59889, June 5, 2008 Ravina vs Villa-Abrille, GR 160708, October 16, 2009 (c) personal debts, FC 122 People v. Lagrimas, 29 SCRA 153 Go vs Yamane, 489 SCRA 107 Buado vs Buado, supra (4) winnings from gambling, FC 123 7. Ownership, administration and enjoyment (a) Joint administration, FC 124 cf. FC. 96 Guiang vs CA, 291 SCRA 372 Heirs vs Mijares, 410 SCRA 97 Roxas v. CA 198 SCRA 541 [1991] Ysasi v. Fernandez, 23 SCRA 1079 Docena vs. Lapesura, 355 SCRA 658 Homeowners Savings Loan Bank vs. Dailo, G.R. No. 153802, Mar. 11, 2005 Alinas vs Alinas, GR No. 158040, April 14, 2008 (b) Sole administration C incapacity, FC 124, 253, Uy vs. CA, 346 SCRA 246 (2) separation in fact, FC 100 (3), 127(3) (3) abandonment, FC 101, 128 (4) pendency of legal separation proceedings, FC 61 Sabalones v. CA 230 SCRA 79 Ravina vs Villa-Abrille, supra (¢) Disposition and encumbrance, FC 124-125; FC 97, 121 (8) Felipe v. Heirs of Aldon, 120 SCRA 628 (see NCC 1390) Cheeseman v. IAC 193 SCRA 93 Frenzel vs. Catito, G.R. No. 143958, July 11, 2003 19Ayuste vs.CA, G. Rno. 118784, Sept. 2, 1999 Villaranda vs. Spouses Villaranda, G.R. No. 153447, Feb,23, 2004 Ainzavs.CA, G.R. No. 165420. June 30, 2005 (see NCC 1145) Alinas vs. Alinas, G.R. No, 158040, April 14, 2008 8. Effect of separation de facto, FC 127, FC 100 ef. FC 239 9, Effect of abandonment, FC 128 cf. FC 101 Partosa-Jo v. CA 216 SCRA 693 10, Dissolution of CPG, FC 126 fa) death, FC 126 (1) FC 50 in rel, To FC 43 (2) judicial separation of property, FC 134-138 9. Effects of dissolution, FC 129 Metropolitan Bank vs Pascual, GR No. 163744, Feb. 29, 2008 Tarrosa us De Leon, GR 185063, July 23, 2009 Sales v Sales, G.R. No. 174803, July 13, 2009 liquidation procedure, FC 129 cause other than death, FC 129; FC 43(2), FC 63(2) jermination due to death; FC 130, cf. FC 104 12, For marriages before FC, FC 131 13. Applicability of Rules of Court, FC 132 14, Support during CPG liquidation, FC 133 Santero v. CFI, 153 SCRA 728 G. Regime of separation of property 1. When applicable in the marriage settlements, FC 143-146 yhen mandatory, FC 103 & FC 130 (c} reconciliation in legal separation, FC 66(2) 2. Property covered, FC 144 3. Administration (a) by the owner-spouse, FC 145 by the other spouse, FC 142 FC 100 (3); 101 4. Family expenses, FC 146 5. Conveyances between the spouses, FC 87, NCC 1490 H, Judicial separation of property 1, When possibie, FC 134 Maquilan vs Maquilan, June &, 2007 2. For sufficient cause, FC 135 cf. FC 55 (10) 203. Voluntary separation of property, FC 136, FC 74-75, FC 134 Lacson v. San Jose-Lacson, 24 SCRA 837 4. Effects of judicial separation of property (a) liquidation of CPG or ACP, FC 137 par. 1 (b) support pendente lite, FC'137 par. 2 regime after JSP, FC 138 of FC 66 (2) (@) binding effect on third parties, FC 139-140; of FC 66(2) 5. Revival of property regime after JSP, FC 141 ef, FC 67 6. Transfer of administration of exclusive property, FC 142 cf NCC 196; FC 96; FC 124 1. Property regime of unions without marriage Review: FC 6, 35 (2), 35 (3), 35 voidable marriages) b. The Family Home , 36, 38, 53; FC 41, 44; FC 45 (Void and 1. Unions under FC 147 Maxey v. CA, 129 SCRA 187 cf, NCC 144 ‘Domingo v. CA 226 SCRA 572 ( All Opinions) Belcodero v. CA 227 SCRA 303 Valdes v. QC RTC, supra Carino vs. Carino, supra Fehr vs. Fehr, G-R. No. 152716. October 23, 2003, Joaquino vs Reyes, 434 SCRA 260 Gonzales vs Gonzales, 478 SCRA 327 » Unions under FC 148 of FC 50 in rel. to FC (2) and FC 50 Juaniza v. Jose, 89 SCRA 306 Yap v. CA, 145 SCRA 229 Bienvenido v. Court of Appeals, 237 SCRA 676 Agapay vs Agapay, 276 SCRA 340 Tumlos vs. Sps. Fernandez, G.R. No. 137650, Apr 12, 2000 Malilin vs Castillo, 333 SCRA 628 Saguid vs. CA, GR. No. 150611, June 10, 2003 Villanueva vs CA, 427 SCRA 439 Joaquino vs Reyes, 434 SCRA 260 Francisco vs Master Iron Works, 451 SCRA 494 Atienza vs.de Castro,G.R. No. 1695698, Nov. 29, 2006 Acre vs Yutiki, September 27, 2007 Signey v SSS, GR No. 173582, Jan. 28, 2008 Borromeo vs Descallar, GR No. 159310, Feb. 24, 2009 Heirs of Maramag vs De Guzman, GR 181132, June 5, 2009 tution (Arts. 149 - 151) 5. 152-162) ‘What governs family relations, FC 149 Alavado v. City of Tacloban, 139 SCRA 230 Arroyo v. CA, 203 SCRA 753 B. Effects of family relationship on legal disputes FC 150-151 NCC 2035 ROC Rule 16 Sec. 1(j) RPC 20, 247 and 332 21Gayon v, Gayon, 36 SCRA 104 ‘Wainwright v. Versoza, 26 SCRA 78 Magbaleta vs Gonong, 76 SCRA 511 De Guzman vs Genato, 89 SCRA 674 O’Laco vs Co Cho Chit, 220 SCRA 656 ‘Tribiana vs.Tribiana, G.R. No. 137359, Sept. 13, 2004 Hiyas Savings and Loan Bank, Inc. vs. Acufia, G.R, NO. 154132, August 31, 2006 Intestate Estate v People, G.R. No. 181409, February 11, 2010 . The family home 1, What constitutes the “family home” Republic v Serrano, G.R. No. 183063, February 24, 2010 2. Who may constitute the family home, FC 152, FC 161 Taneo vs CA, 304 SCRA 308 3. When deemed constituted, FC 153 4. When terminated, FC 153 compare with FC 159 5. Beneficiaries, FC 154 Patricio us. Dario, G.R. No. 170829, November 20, 2006 6. Exemptions, FC 155, FC 157, FC 160 7. When may be sold, FC 158 Modequillo v. Breva, 185 SCRA 766 Siari Valley v. Lucasan, 109 Phil 294 Honrado vs.CA, G.R. No. 166333, Nov. 25, 2005 Cabang us Basay, GR No. 180587, March 20, 2009 8. Rights of creditors, FC 160-162 Ching vs CA, 423 SCRA 356 Modequillo vs Breva, 185 SCRA 756 Cabreza vs Cabreza, GR 171260, September 11, 2009 Metrobank v Viray, G.R. No. 162218, February 25, 2010 ‘VI. Paternity and Filiation a. Legitimate Children (Arts. 163-171) &. Legitimated Children (Arts. 177- 182) A. Concept of patemity, filiation and legitimacy, FC 163 B. Legitimate children, FC 164 cf, FC 166 in rel to NCC 256-257 Tan v. Trocio, 191 SCRA 754 Angeles vs Maglaya, 469 SCRA 363 SSS vs. Aguas, G.R. 165546, Feb. 27, 2006 Rivera vs Heirs of Villanueva, GR No. 141501, July 21, 2006 1. Who are considered legitimate children {a) conceived during marriage ef. ROC Rule 131 Sec. 3(dd) FC Art. 168 1, valid marriage 222. terminated marriage under FC 42 in rel. to FC 43(1) 2, void marriages under FC 54, 36 3. voidable marriages (b) born during marriage conceived by artificial insemination cf. NCC 40 adopted children {e) legitimated children 2. Rights of legitimate children, FC 173-174 NCC 364, 374, 376 NCC 888, NCC 979 Moore v. Republic, 8 SCRA 282 Naldoza v. Republic, 112 SCRA 658 Marquino vs IAC, 233 SCRA 348 Ong vs CA, 272 SCRA 725 Rep. vs CA, 300 SCRA 138 De la Cruz vs Gracia, G.R. No. 177728, July 31, 2009 Continental Steel vs. Montano, GR 182836, October 13, 2009 C. Illegitimate children 1, Who are considered illegitimate (a) under NCC (b) under FC 165 Joanie Surposa Uy v Jose Ngo Chua, G.R. No. 183965, ‘September 18, 2009 2. Rights of illegitimate children, FC 175-176 Osmefia de Valencia v. Rodriguez, 84 Phil 222 Jao vs CA, 152 SCRA 359 Uyguangco vs CA, 178 SCRA 684 Mangulabnan v. IAC,185 SCRA 760 Mendoza vs. Court of Appeals, 201 SCRA 675, September 24, 1994 De Santos vs. Angeles, 251 SCRA 206, December 12, 1995, Lim vs. Court of Appeals, 270 SCRA 1, March 18, 1997 Tijing, Eceta vs. Eceta, 428 SCRA 782, May 20, 2004 Briones vs. Miguel, 440 SCRA 455, October 18, 2004 Cabatania vs. Court of Appeals, 441 SCRA 96, October 21, 2004 Agustin vs. Court of Appeals, 460 SCRA 315, June 15, 2005 Alba vs. Herrera, GR No, 148220, July 29, 2005 Angeles vs, Maglaya, 469 SCRA 363, September 2, 2005 Guy vs CA, GR No. 163707, Sept. 15, 2006 Verceles vs. Posada, G.R. No. 161338, April 27, 2007 People vs Umanito, GR No. 172607, Oct. 26, 2007 Montefaicon v Vasquez, GR No. 165016, June 17, 2008 Go us Ramos, GR 167569, September 4, 2009 Heirs of Maramag vs De Guzman, GR 181132, June 5, 2009 Joanie Surposa Uy v Jose Ngo Chua, G.R. No. 183965, September 18, 2009 DOJ Opinion No. 11 Series of 1990 DOJ Opinion No. 4, Series of 1998 D. Action to impugn legitimacy 1. Grounds, FC 166 23Memorize! (a) Physical impossibility of access Andal v. Macaraig, 89 Phil 165 Macadangdang v. CA, 100 SCRA 73 Ong vs. Court of Appeals, 272 SCRA 725 Concepcion us. CA, G.R. No. 123450, Aug. 31, 2005 (b) Biological or other scientific grounds ‘A.M. No. 06-11-5-SC (RULE ON DNA Evidence) effective October 15, 2007 Jao v. CA, 152 SCRA 359 People v. Tumimpad, 235 SCRA 483 People v. Quitoriano, GR. No. 118852, Jan. 20, 1997 Tijing, 2001 Herrera vs. Alba, G.R. No. 148220, June 15,2005 Agustin, June 15, 2005 Estate of Rogelio Ong v. Minor Joanne Diaz, G.R. No. 171713, Dec. 17, 2007 ) FC 166(3) 2. Effect of a mother’s declaration, FC 167 ‘Chua Keng Giap v. IAC, 158 SCRA 18 Rodriguez v. CA, 245 SCRA 150 3. In subsequent marriages, FC 168, 169 8. Presumptions, FC 170, 171 Cobatbat-Lim vs IAC, 166 SCRA 451 5. Prescription of action to impugn legitimacy Gaspay v. CA, 238 SCRA 163 6. Who may impugn Benitez-Badua v. CA, 229 SCRA 468 Lim v. IAC, 166 SCRA 451 Liyao, Jr. vs. Tanhoti-Liyao, 378 SCRA 563, E. Proof of Filiation 1. Of legitimate children, FC 172-173 Diaz vs. Court of Appeals, 129 SCRA 621, June 22, 1984 Reyes v. CA,135 SCRA 439 Tison vs. Court of Appeals, 276 SCRA 582, July 31, 1997 Trinidad vs. Court of Appeals, 289 SCRA 188, April 20, 1998 Jison vs. Court of Appeals, 286 SCRA 495, February 24, 1998, Labagala vs. Santiago, 371 SCRA 360 ‘Tecson vs. COMELEC, Poe, et al., G.R. No. 161434, Mar. 3, 2004 De Jesus vs, Estate of Juan Gamboa Dizon, 366 SCRA 499 Agustin vs, Court of Appeals, 460 SCRA 315, June 15, 2005 Ong vs. Diaz, December 17, 2007 2. Of illegitimate children, FC 175 Castro v. CA, 173 SCRA 656 Lim v. CA, 65 SCRA 160 Bafias v. Bafias, 134 SCRA 260 In re Christensen, 102 Phil 1055 iano v. CA 231 SCRA 242 24Baluyut v. Baluyut, 186 SCRA 506 ‘Mendoza v. CA, 201 SCRA 675 Marquino v. IAC, 233 SCRA 348 (1994) Fernandez v. CA, 230 SCRA 130 dison vs. CA, 286 SCRA 495 Eceta vs. Eceta, G.R, No. 157037, May 20, 2004 Heirs of Gabatan vs CA, GR 150206, March 13, 2009 Jenie San Juan Dela Cruz,, et al vs. Ronald Paul S. Gracia, G.R. No. 177728, July 31, 2009 Joselito Musni Puno V Puno Enterprises, Inc., G.R. No. 177066, September 11, 2009 3. Rights of illegitimate children, FC 176 Liyao vs. Liyao, 378 SCRA 563, March 7, 2002 Leonardo vs. Court Of Appeals, G. R. No. 125329. September 10, 2003 Republic vs. Capote, February 2, 2007 Go vs Ramos, GR 167569, September 4, 2009 4. Compulsory recognition, ef. RPC 345, RPC 46, 59 Solinap vs. Locsin, 371 SCRA 711 Pp vs. Delantar, G.R. No. 169143, February 2, 2007 Gapusan v. CA, 183 SCRA 160 People v. Rizo, 189 SCRA 265 Dempsey v. RTC, 164 SCRA 384 People v. Bayani, G.R. No. 120894 Oct. 3, 1996 People vs. Magtibay, G.R. No. 142985. Aug. 6, 2002 People v Abella, G.R. No. 177295, January 6, 2010 Egap Madsali, Sajiron Lajim And Maron Lajim v People Of The Philippines, G.R. No. 179570, February 4, 2010 F. Legitimated Children 1, who may be legitimated, FC 177 Abadilla vs Tabiliran, 249 SCRA 447 2. how legitimation takes place, FC 178, FC 180 3. retroactivity and effects, FC 180-181 DOJ Opinion No. 106 Series of 1991 4. action to impugn legitimation, FC 182 5. rights of legitimated children, FC 179 VII. Adoption (RA 8552) Lazatin v. Campos, 92 SCRA 250. Cervantes v, Fajardo, 169 SCRA 575, R.A, 8552 (Domestic Adoption Law) No. 02-6-02-8.C. (Aug. 22, 2002) A. Requisites to be an adopter 1, Age and capacity required ~ Sec. 7 2. Husband and wife jointly ~ Sec. 7 Republic v. CA, 205 SCRA 356 In re petition for adoption of Michelle Lim, GR 168992, May 21, 2009 3. Need for consent - Sec. 9 Santos v. Aransanzo, 16 SCRA 344 Daoang v. Municipal Judge, 159 SCRA 369 Duncan v. CFI, 69 SCRA 298 25Landingin us. RP, G.R. No. 164948, June 27, 2006 4, Aliens as adopters ~ Sec. 7 (b) Pardo de Tavera v. Cacdac, 167 SCRA 626 Republic v. Toledano, 233 SCRA 9 RA. 8043, *The Law on Inter-Country Adoption” A.M. No, 02-6-02-S.C. (Aug. 22, 2002) B. Who may not adopt C. Who may be adopted D. Who may not be adopted E. Procedure in adoption Republic Act No. 9523, March 12, 2009 - AN ACT REQUIRING CERTIFICATION OF THE DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL WELFARE AND DEVELOPMENT (DSWD) TO DECLARE A "CHILD LEGALLY AVAILABLE FOR ADOPTION" AS A PREREQUISITE FOR ADOPTION PROCEEDINGS, F. Effects of a decree of adoption 1. On status 2. On parental authority, ‘Tamargo v. CA, 209 SCRA 518 Cervantes v. Fajardo, 169 SCRA 575, 3. On hereditary rights 4. On name In the Matter of Adoption of Stephanie Garcia, 454 SCRA 541 G. Rescission of adoption Lahom vs, Sibulo, G.R. No, 143989, July 14, 2003 1. by the adopted 2. by the adopter/s 3. effects of rescission VIII. Support (Arts. 194 ~ 208) a. Concept, Kinds, Characteristics b. Persons Obliged to Give Support c. Properties Liable for Support d. When and How Support be Paid €. Special Rules on Conventional Support ‘A, What comprises support, FC 194 B. Who are obliged to provide support, FC 195, 196 Pelayo v. Lauron, 12 Phil 453. Sanchez v. Zulueta, 68 Phil 110 Reyes v. Ines-Luciano, 88 SCRA 803 De Asis vs. CA, G.R. No. 127578, Feb. 15, 1999 De Guzman vs Perez, 496 SCRA 474 Joanie Surposa Uy v Jose Ngo Chua, G.R. No. 183965, September 18, 2009 Lajim v Peopte Of The Philippines, G.R. No. 179570, February 4, 2010 C. Source of support, FC 197-198, cf. FC 49, 70, 94, 122 26Lam vs Chua, 2004 Lerma v. CA, 61 SCRA 440 Reyes vs Ines-Luciano, 88 SCRA 803 D. Order of support, FC 199, 200 Mangonon vs. CA, G.R. No. 125041, June 30, 2006 ‘Spouses Lim v Lim, G.R. No. 163209, October 30, 2009 E. Manner and time of payment, FC 200-204 Canonizado v. Benitez, 127 SCRA 610 F, Amount of support, FC 200-208 Lacson vs. Lacson, G.R.No. 150644, August 28, 2006 Sy vs CA. Dec. 27, 2009 G. Renunciation and Termination, NCC 2035; FC 194 HL. Support pendente lite, FC 198; Rules of Court, Rule 61 1. Procedure in applications for support, Rule 61 IX. Parental Authority (Arts. 209 - 215) a.Substitute and Special parental Authority (Arts. 216 ~ 219) . Effect of Parental Authority Upon the Persons of Children (Arts, 220-224) ©. Effect of Parental Authority Upon the Property of Children (Arts. 225- 227) d. Suspension or Termination of Parental Authority (Arts. 228 - 233) ¢. Incidents Involving Parental Authority (Arts. 249 - 252) A. Concept of parental authority, FC 209 Medina vs. Makabali, 27 SCRA 502, March 28, 1969 Unson vs. Navarro, 101 SCRA 183, November 17, 1980 Lacson v. Lacson 24 SCRA 837 Soriano v Laguardia, G.R. No. 164785, April 29, 2009 Bagtas v Hon. Ruth Santos, G.R. No. 166682, November 27, 2009 B. Transfer of PA, FC 210 ef. FC 223-224, FC 234 Eslao vs CA, 266 SCRA 317 C. Who exercises PA, FC 211-213 cf. FC 49, 102(6) and 63( Hontiveros v. IAC 132 SCRA 745 Unson v. Navarro 101 SCRA 183 Espiritu & Layug v. CA, G.R. No, 115640 (1995) Santos Sr. v. C.A., G-R. No. 113054 (1995) Sagala-Eslao v. Cordero-Ouye, G.R. 116773, Jan. 16, 1997 Bondagiy vs. Bondagiy, 371 SCRA 642 Salientes vs Salientes, 500 SCRA 128 Sy vs CA, GR No. 162938, Dec. 27,2007 ‘Spouses Lim v Lim, G.R. No. 163209, October 30, 2009 CC. Substitute PA, FC 214-216, FC 233, Vancil vs Belmes, 358 SCRA 707 27D. Special PA FC 218-219, FC 233 cf, FC 221 in rel. to NCC 2180 Pasco vs CFI_Bulacan, April 25, 1988 Amadora v. CA, 160 SCRA 315 Salvosa v. IAC, 166 SCRA 274 PSBA v. CA, February 4, 1992 Saludaga vs. FEU, 30 April 08 St. Francis High School v. CA, 194 SCRA 341 St. Mary’s Academy vs. Carpitanos, G.R, No. 143363, February 6, 2002 Child learning Centre vs. Tagario, GR 150920, NOV. 25, 2005 School of the Holy Spirit vs. Taguiam, GR 165565, July 14, 2008 E, Filial privilege, FC 215 ROC Rule 130 Sec. 25 ef. Secs. 22 & 23 F. Bifects of PA over the child’s person, FC 220-222 FC 223.224 Medina v. Makabali, 27 SCRA 502 Luna v. IAC, 137 SCRA 7 Cuadra v. Monfort, 35 SCRA 160 RA. 7610, The Child Abuse Law G. Effects of PA over the child’s property, FC 225-227 Pineda vs CA, 226 SCRA 754 RA 9231, Secs. 12-B and 12-C Lindain v. CA, 212 SCRA 725 Badillo vs. Ferrer, 152 SCRA 407 H. Suspension or termination of PA 1. permanent termination, FC 228, 232, cf. RA 6809 2. non-permanent termination, FC 229 cf, FC 193 3. suspension of PA, FC 231-230 Chua v. Cabangbang, 27 SCRA 791 De Guzman vs Perez, 496 SCRA 474 4. revival See: R.A. 8369, “An Act Establishing Family Courts, Granting Them Exclusive Original Jurisdiction Over Child and Family Cases.” See: R.A. 7610, “Child Abuse Act” XII. Emancipation and Age of Majority (RA 6809) ‘A. Cause of emancipation, FC 234 as amended B. Effect of emancipation, FC 236 as amended cf. FC 15, NCC 2180 XII. Use of Surname 28NCC 364-380 RA 9255 Naldoza v. Republic, supra Johnston v. Republic, 7 SCRA 1040 Ng Yao Sing v. Republic 16 SCRA 483, Llaneta v. Agrava, 57 SCRA 29 Telmo v. Republic, 73 SCRA 29 Tolentino v. CA, 162 SCRA 66 Legamia v. IAC, 131 SCRA 479 Yasin v. Hon. Judge Shari’a Court G.R. No. 94986 (1995) In the Matter of the Adoption of Stephanie Nathy Astorga Garcia, G.R. No, 148311, March 31, 2005. In Re Change of Name, Julainan Carulasan Wang, G.R. No. 159966.March 30, 2005 Gonzaludo vs People, GR 150910, February 6, 2006 XIV. Summary Judicial Proceedings in the Family Law (Arts. 238 ~ 248) XV, Other Matters Subject to Summary Special Proceedings (Arts. 253 - 257). XVI. RULES GOVERNING PERSONS WHO ARE ABSENT NCC 381-396, FC 41 Reyes v. Alejandro, 141 SCRA 65 Eastern Shipping v. Lucero, 124 SCRA 425 ‘Tol-Noquera v. Villamor, 211 SCRA 616 Manuel vs. People, G.R. No. 165842, Nov. 29, 2005 Olaguer vs. Purugganan, G.R. No. 158907, February 12, 2007 XVI FUNERALS NCC 305-310 Eugenio v. Velez, 185 SCRA 425 XVII. ENTRIES IN THE CIVIL REGISTER NCC 407-413 ROC, Rule 108 RA 9048 Barretto vs Local Civil registrar, 74 SCRA 257 Republic vs De la Cruz, 118 SCRA 18 Republic v. Marcos, 182 SCRA 223 Labayo-Rowe v. Republic, 168 SCRA 294 Re: Final Report On The Judicial Audit Conducted At The Regional Trial Court, Br. 67, Paniqui, Tarlac, Adm. Matter No. 06-7-414-RTC, October 19, 2007 Republic vs. Jennifer Cagandahan, , G.R. No. 166676, Sept. 12, 2008 Jenie San Juan Dela Cruz V Ronald Paul S. Gracia, G.R. No. 177728, July 31, 2009 Ma. Cristina Torres Braza v The City Civil Registrar, G.R. No. 181174, December 4, 2009 **Based on the Outline of Atty. Katrina Legarda 29