Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Republic v. Gingayon
Facts:
NAIA 3, a project between the Government and the Philippine International Air
Terminals Co., Inc (PIATCO) was nullified.
ISSUE:
Ruling:
Unlike in the case of Rule 67, the application of Rep. Act No. 8974 will not
contravene the 2004 Resolution, which requires the payment of just
compensation before any takeover of the NAIA 3 facilities by the Government.
The 2004 Resolution does not particularize the extent such payment must be
effected before the takeover, but it unquestionably requires at least some
degree of payment to the private property owner before a writ of possession
may issue. The utilization of Rep. Act No. 8974 guarantees compliance with this
bare minimum requirement, as it assures the private property owner the
payment of, at the very least, the proffered value of the property to be seized.
Such payment of the proffered value to the owner, followed by the issuance of
the writ of possession in favor of the Government, is precisely the schematic
under Rep. Act No. 8974, one which facially complies with the prescription laid
down in the 2004 Resolution.