Strategi Meraih Akreditasi

Internasional

Dr. Pepen Arifin

Satuan Penjaminan Mutu - ITB
Continuous Quality Improvement (1)

Toyota Kijang Generasi I Toyota Kijang Generasi II

(1977 – 1981) (1981 – 1985)
26.806 unit 84.068 unit

2
Continuous Quality Improvement (2)

Toyota Kijang Generasi III Toyota Kijang Generasi IV

(1985 – 1997) (1997 – 2004)
509.687 unit 429.674 unit

3
Continuous Quality Improvement (3)

Toyota Kijang Generasi V Toyota Kijang Generasi V

(2004 -2011 ) (face lift)
2012

4
 What is accreditation?

Accreditation is external quality assurance that an

institution or university program meets the quality
standards established by organizations representing
the academic community, professionals, for which it
prepares its students.
 What is a standard/criteria?

 The standard/criteria for ABET, ASIIN and AUN-QA is

outcome based. It focuses on what the students have
learned or what they can actually do.
 The Standard/Criteria is set by:
 Professional (ABET)
 Technical university, University of Applied Sciences, Technical
and Scientific Professionals and Federation of Employers
(ASIIN)
 AUN-QA
What are the benefits of accreditation?

 Student choosing an educational program

 Parents seeking assurance of a quality education
 Institutions program’s strengths and weaknesses and of
ways to improve their education
 Employers recruiting well-prepared graduates to begin
professional practice
 Industry seeking to voice educational needs to institutions
 Government and partners and public that their funds are
spend well
 Consideration for admission for excellent graduate
programs worldwide
 How does a degree program get
accredited?

The degree program must:

 meet general criteria and specific/program
 demonstrate that it uses a continual process of
evaluating the courses and curricula.
 makes curricula changes when needed
 show that it examines and improves its own
evaluation process.
How is program evaluation done?

The Program must prepare Self-Study Report:

 Provide detailed information on all aspects of the program
 Qualitative and Quantitative assessment of the strengths and
limitations of the program

The assessment should include

 the achievement of institutional and program educational
objectives
 assessment of outcome-competencies
 involve broad and appropriate groups in its preparation and
process
Continuous improvement: the heart of
accreditation

 Establish purpose (mission statement) and set goals

(timeline)
 Define/refine program educational objectives and
student outcomes
 Design and conduct assessments
 Evaluate assessment findings
 Use results for decision making
 What is ABET?

 Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology

 Accreditor for degree program in the disciplines of applied
science, computing, engineering and engineering
technology at the bachelor and master degree levels.
 Four commission:
 Applied Science Accreditation Commission (ASAC)
 Computing Accreditation Commission (CAC)
 Engineering Accreditation Commission (EAC)
 Engineering Technology Accreditation Commission (ETAC)
Program eligibility requirements

 ABET accredits programs only—not

departments, colleges, institutions, or individuals.
 Program is an integrated, organized experience
that culminates in the awarding of a degree.
 The program will have program educational
objectives, student outcomes, a curriculum,
faculty, and facilities
 ABET accredit programs offered by degree-
granting institutions with verifiable and
recognized governmental, national, or regional
authority to confer degrees
 Programs requesting an initial accreditation
review must have at least one graduate prior to
the academic year when the on-site review
occurs.
 Be accreditable under at least one abet
accreditation commission
 ABET require a preliminary Self-Study Report
from all programs seeking initial accreditation,
if the institution has no currently ABET-
accredited programs in that same
commission.
 Accreditation step by step (1)

 Step 1: Complete the Readiness Review by

November 1
 Step 2: Submit your Request for Evaluation
and Request for Approval by January 31
 Step 3: Complete and submit your Self-Study
Report by July 1
 Step 4: The On-Site Visit takes place
September – December
Accreditation step by step (2)
 Step 5: Due Process and the Accreditation Decision
 1 Week After the Visit: Provide the review team with any
errors of fact resulting from the exit meeting.
 2-3 months after the visit: Your institution receives the
Draft Statement, a formal communication of your
review team’s findings.
 3-4 months after the visit: During the 30-Day Due
Process period your institution responds to any
shortcomings identified in the Draft Statement
 July: The ABET commissions meet to decide
Accreditation Actions.
 By August 31: Your program is formally notified of the
accreditation action via the Final Statement to the
institution.
Fees for Programs Outside the U.S. (2017
– 2018 cycles)

 Readiness Reviews
 Fee for each program reviewed $1,000
 On-Site Reviews
 Base fee for an on-site review $8,025
 Fee for each program evaluator (PEV) $8,025
 Additional Fees
 One evaluator reviewing two programs $345
 Extra day, per program evaluator $345
 Visit to off-campus location, per location $345
 Travel Expense Reimbursement (airfare & accommodation)
 Annual Maintenance
 Base fee per campus per commission $1,295
 Fee for accredited program at each campus $1,295
 What is ASIIN?

 Akkreditierungs agentur für Studiengänge der

Ingenieurwissenschaften, der Informatik, der
Naturwissenschaften und der Mathematik
(ASIIN)
 Founded in 1999 as the non-profit association for the
accreditation of degree programmes in engineering an
informatics (ASII)
 Expanded to ASIIN in 2002 by including the fields of natural
sciences and mathematics.
 Since 2000, ASII or ASIIN has the right to award the
accreditation seal of the German Accreditation Council, in
addition to the ASIIN quality seal
Founding Members of ASIIN e. V.
ASIIN Technical Committee
 Program accreditation
Bachelor’s and Master’s degree programmes:
 in engineering
 in computer science
 in natural sciences
 in all interdisciplinary areas that include one or more of
the aforementioned subject areas
 in international and European collaborations, e.g.
“double degree” or “joint degree”, that include one of the
aforementioned subject areas
 in teacher training programmes
ASIIN’s International Seal
and Quality Label
What is the procedure of
accreditation?
Initiation of the Accreditation Process

 University is asked to turn in the Accreditation Request

 Discussion in ASIIN‘s Technical Committee(s)
 University will receive tender letter (including benefits,
price and a proposed timeline)
 Preparing the Self-Assessment

 Self assessment report must be compiled by the

university
 It should be based on the internal QA-system
 Compilation takes 6-12 months to prepare
 University staff (administrative and academic) needs to
contribute content
 Preparation and discussion of the draft of the self
assessment based on: General Criteria + Subject-
Specific Criteria
 The on-site visit
 Standard team for initial accreditation:
4 ASIIN peers, representatives from
 Technical Universities or Universities (more research
oriented; 1-2 peers)
 Universities of Applied Sciences (1-2 peers)
 Industry (1 peer)
 Discussion with representatives of institution‘s
administration
 Discussion with professors responsible for the
development of the program
 The on-site visit

 Discussion with academic staff

 Discussion with students/alumni/ representatives of
industry
 Review of exams (written, final, projects…)
 Visitation of the institution (laboratories, library, …)
 Final internal discussion of auditors
 Final meeting with institution‘s representatives
 The accreditation decision:
Possible outcomes
1. Accreditation without reservation: Accreditation
valid for five years.
2. Conditional accreditation with requirements and
recommendations: Accreditation initially limited to
one year, extended to a total of five years after
fulfillment of the requirements.
3. Suspension of the accreditation process: With
conditions, for up to 18 months. The process will be
taken up again after the conditions have been met.
4. Rejection
 Financial Framework

 ASIIN e.V. is a non-profit organisation

 Costs depend on:
 Number of peers (travelling, accommodation and
subsistence)
 Number of programs to be accredited
 Duration of audit
 Typical 1 cluster (3 programs)~US$ 5,300/program
 What is ASEAN University
Network (AUN)?
 Association of the leading universities and colleges in
ASEAN member Countries
 Established in November 1995
 Charter of the AUN was signed by the ASEAN Ministers
responsible for higher education.
 Comprise of 26 leading universities from 10 ASEAN
countries
 AUN Member (Indonesia):
 Universitas Gadjah Mada
 Universitas Indonesia
 Institut Teknologi Bandung
 Universitas Airlangga
31
AUN Major Activities within ASEAN

 ASEAN studies program

 Student and faculty exchange program
 Scholarships program
 Information networking
 Collaborative research
 AUN-QA
 ASEAN executive development program
 ASEAN graduate business/economics program

32
AUN Towards ASEAN Community

33
 AUN-Quality Assurance (AUN-QA)
Background

 Established in November 2000 (Bangkok Accord)

 Aim:
 to promote the development of a quality assurance
system as an instrument for maintaining, improving and
enhancing teaching, research and the overall academic
standards of AUN member universities.

34
 Bangkok Accord

 Appoint CQO (Chief Quality Officer) from each member

university
 Establish system of common QA criteria
 Mutual collaboration and information exchange
 Encourage good practices for QA
 Facilitate auditing and assessment
 Mutual consultation on any differences or disputes
 Seek further and deeper engagement with ASEAN dialogue
partners

35
 Objectives of AUN-QA
 Develop, promote, implement and enhance the AUN-
QA Guidelines and criteria
 Facilitate and conduct AUN quality assessment
 Serve as the authority for issuing AUN quality labels
 Develop and train quality assurance professionals
and practitioners
 Provide advisory and consulting services on best
quality assurance practices
 Collaborate with other quality agencies inside and
outside ASEAN in relation to harmonisation of quality
assurance frameworks and development of
professionals in quality assurance.
36
 AUN-QA Members

 Universitas Gadjah Mada

 Universitas Indonesia
 Institut Teknologi Bandung
 Universitas Airlangga

37
 AUN-QA Associate Members

1. Institut Pertanian Bogor

2. Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember
3. Univeritas Brawijaya
4. Universitas Diponegoro
5. Universitas Hasanuddin
6. Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
7. UIN Syarif Hidayatullah, Jakarta
8. London School of Public Relation, Jakarta
9. Universitas Sebelas Maret, Solo
10. Universitas Islam Indonesia
11. Universitas Bina Nusantara
12. Universitas Muhammadiyah, Malang
13. UIN Sunan Kalijaga, Yogyakarta
 How to become AUN-QA associate
member?
 The intent university need to send trainee to be
trained, learn, and understand more about AUN-QA
System. The system need to be implemented at their
own university.
 After the system is implemented, the university will
need to submit the letter of intent to apply for AUN-
QA Associate Membership along with this application
form. This application then will be submitted to AUN-
QA Council for approval.
 After the university is accepted, the university can
then request for the assessment by submitting the list
of programmes to be assessed to AUN Secretariat.
 AUN-QA Assessment

 Individual members may invite and facilitate auditing,

assessment and review by other Member Universities
as well as by external bodies
 AUN member institutions welcome cross-external
audits using commonly agreed upon auditing
instruments and using quality criteria of the core
activities of member universities

41
 The aims of assessment

 Improvement and assurance of academic quality

 Provides evidence of quality to the public
 Provides mechanisms for continuous quality
improvement for the sustainability and development of
the program
 To promote the recognition and acceptance of AUN
programs which have demonstrated their competence
and quality
 Harmonization of higher education in ASEAN.
 Graduates are recognized for their competent training
and employability.
42
 AUN-QA Assessment at Program
Level
 Self-assessment
 Self Assessment Report (SAR) using criteria approved by the
AUN-QA
 Peer Assessment
 On-site review and validation of the evidence.
 Action and Feedback
 Reviews the evidence and recommendations, prepares its
decision, and communicates the Assessment Team’ s report and
AUN decision to the institution.
 Monitoring and Oversight
 The quality of the program needs to be monitored and
maintained over cycles of every few years.

43
Report and decision

44
Expense of the AUN-QA Assessment
Item Member Associate Member

1. Honorarium for Lead USD 750 per programme USD 750 per programme
Assessors (borne by host) (borne by host)

2. Honorarium for USD 500 per programme USD 500 per programme
Assessors (borne by host) (borne by host)

3. Airfare for Assessors Borne by host(economy Borne by host(economy

and two AUN Secretariats class) class)

4. Accommodation for
Assessors and two AUN Borne by host Borne by host
Secretariats
USD 1,000 per USD 1,000 per
5. Administrative Fee to
assessment (borne by assessment (borne by
AUN Secretariats
host) host)

6. Local Hospitality (meals

Borne by host Borne by host
and transportation)

USD 1,000 per

7. Development fund NONE programme (borne by
45 host)
 ABET-ASIIN-JABEE-AUN-QA-BAN PT
ABET ASIIN JABEE AUN-QA BAN-PT

Accreditation Accreditation Accreditation Assessment Accreditation

International International International Regional National

Outcomes Outcomes Outcomes Outcomes IPO-Outcomes

SSR - visit SAR - visit SER - visit SAR - visit SAR - visit

Professional Professional Professional Semi-Gov Government

Program Program Program Program & Program &

Institutional Institutional
Eng, Comp, Engineering Engineering All Programs All Programs
Tech Informatics,
Sciences
Strategies for International Accreditation

 Establishment of Quality Assurance System

 In-line of IQA and EQA Systems
 Shifting in Curriculum Paradigm
 Outcomes Based Education
 In-line of IQA and EQA systems

Internal Quality Assurance (IQA)

(Assessment, Audit)

External Quality Assurance (EQA)

(Accreditation, Assessment)
 Closed Loop Cycle of Quality Assurance Process
(Example - ITB)

• Develop quality standard Implementation Evaluation of unit’s

• Develop guideline to of guideline by unit achievement by QAU F/S
achieve standard

Monitoring on implementation
compliance by IAU ITB

• Improvement of Monitoring, Assessment and

quality standard Evaluation by QAU ITB
• Improvement of guideline
 Shifting in Curriculum Paradigm

 Outcomes Based Education (OBE)

 Learner Centered Education (LCE)
 Continuous Improvement
 International Accreditation and Benchmarking
Outcome Based Education

IT’S NOT WHAT WE TEACH,

IT’S WHAT YOU LEARN

51
 What is Outcomes Based Education?
• OBE is an educational process that focuses on what students can do or
the qualities they should develop after they are taught.
• OBE involves the restructuring of curriculum, assessment and
reporting practices in education to reflect the achievement of high order
learning and mastery rather than accumulation of course credits.
• Both structures and curricula are designed to achieve those
capabilities or qualities.
• Discourages traditional education approaches based on direct instruction
of facts and standard methods.
• It requires that the students demonstrate that they have learnt the
required skills and content.

55
Focuses and benefit of OBE
OBE addresses the following key questions:
• What do we want the students to have or be able to do?
• How can we best help students achieve it?
• How will we know whether they students have achieved it?
• How do we close the loop for further improvement
(Continuous Quality Improvement (CQI))?

56
Focuses and benefit of OBE

Benefits of OBE
• More directed & coherent curriculum.
• Graduates will be more “relevant” to industry & other
stakeholders (more well rounded graduates).
• Continuous Quality Improvement (CQI) is in place.

57
 Educational Business Process
Vision & Mission

Int. Accr. Prog. Ed. IQF

Agency Objectives

Program Stakeholders
Learning Outcomes Survey

Prog. Structure & Curriculum

Faculty Module 1 Module 2 Alumni
Survey
Facilities Module 3 Module n

Teaching & Learning

Std. Advice & Support Students

Institutional Support

Prog. Management Outcomes

Assessment Continuous Improvements

Continuous Improvements : ABET/ASIIN Criteria

 SPMI Bidang Pendidikan tingkat F/S dan Prodi

Kebijakan & Strategi Dekan

Standar & Panduan Pencapaian Standar GKM F/S

Kurikulum dan Implementasinya Ka-Prodi

Dosen Dosen

Proses Pembelajaran Proses Pembelajaran

Asesmen Asesmen Dosen MK

Output/ Output/
Outcome Outcome
Matakuliah? Matakuliah?

Asesmen Program

Output/
GKM Prodi
Outcome
Program?
59
 Organ Penjaminan Mutu - ITB

Rektor

SPM WRAM WRSO WRURK WRRIM WRAAK

GKM DLU Dit./L/U Dit./L/U Dit./L/U Dit./L/U Dit./L/U

Dekan

GKM F/S WDA WDS

GKM Prodi Ka-Prodi

Dosen
60
 MODEL SPMI

ACTION PLAN
• Evaluasi • RKAT, RENSTRA
• Kebijakan baru • Standar/kriteria

Continuous
Quality
Improvement

CHECK DO
• Monitoring • Implementasi RKA
• Asesmen
 MODEL SPMI MATAKULIAH

ACTION PLAN
• Rekomendasi • Silabus & Rencana kuliah
Perbaikan • Standar/kriteria

Continuous
Quality
Improvement

CHECK DO
• Ujian, Kuis, Tugas • Implementasi
• Laporan dll Pembelajaran

Dilaporkan dalam bentuk Portofolio Matakuliah

 MODEL SPMI PRODI

ACTION PLAN
• Rekomendasi • RKAT
Perbaikan • Standar/kriteria

Continuous Resources:
Quality • Biaya
GKM Prodi
• Sarana & Prasarana
Improvement
• SDM

CHECK DO
• Monitoring, Asesment • Implementasi RKAT
• Evaluasi

Dilaporkan dalam bentuk Laporan Prodi/Asesmen Mutu Prodi

 MODEL SPMI PRODI  SPME (AKREDITASI)

ACTION PLAN
• Rekomendasi • RKAT
Perbaikan • Standar/kriteria

Resources:
Siklus • Biaya
GKM Prodi 5 tahun • Sarana & Prasarana
• SDM

CHECK DO
• Monitoring, Asesment • Implementasi RKAT
• Evaluasi

Dilaporkan dalam bentuk Borang Prodi (Akreditasi BAN-PT) atau

Self Study Report (Akreditasi Internasional)
Expected contribution of stakeholders
(example ITB)
 Faculty staffs/task force
 Understand the standards and criteria
 Do outcomes assessment
 Program Chair
 Understand the procedure of accreditation
 curriculum development (OBE)
 Dean
 Support the curriculum development
 Support the improvement of facilities and resources
 SPM
 Focal point for accreditation process
 Priority actions

 Review the curriculum  OBE

 Set the goals (PEO, outcomes)
 OBE implementation
 Curriculum implementation
 Implementation support (faculty, facilities, safety
etc)
 Outcomes and program educational objectives
assessments (direct and indirect)
 Continuous quality improvement (1 cycle)
Workshop Nasional Strategi Meraih Akreditasi Internasional, 18 - 19
67
April 2017