Commissioner, Hindu Religious Endowments,

Madras v. Sri Lakshmindra Thirtha Swamiar of Sri Shirur Mutt 8,

Syedna Taher Saifuddin Saheb v. State of Bombay, AIR 1962 SC 853

Ratilal Panachand Gandhi v. The State of Bombay & Ors (1954) SCR 1055 : AIR 1954 SC
388
Durgah Committee, Ajmer & Anr. v. Syed Hussain Ali & Ors

Sri Lakshmana Yatendru vs State of Andhra Pradesh AIR 1996 SC 1414.

N.Adithyan vs Travencore Devasom Board (2002)8 SCC 106

 Bijoe Emmanuel & Ors. v. State of Kerala & Ors.

S. Mahendran v. The Secretary, Travancore Devaswom Board, Thiruvanathapuram &

Ors17.

Tilkayat Shri Govindalji Maharaj v.

State of Rajasthan

17

Gulam Abbas vs State of Uttar Pradesh AIR 1981 SC 2198

Venkataramana Devaru & Ors. v. State of Mysore & Ors.
S.P. Mittal v. Union of India & Ors22

Commissioner, Hindu Religious Endowments,

Madras v. Sri Lakshmindra Thirtha Swamiar of Sri Shirur Mutt.26
Sardar Syedna TaherSaifuddin Saheb v. State of
Bombay27
This exclusionary practice violates the fundamental right to equality
enshrined under Article 25 of the Constitution of Indiana.

all persons 'equally'

Article 25 (1) protects worship in a temple as an integral part of the religion.

particular place an integral part of

right is

A.2 Article 25(1) can be enforced against the Tenji Board.

Sri Venkataramana Devaru and others State of Mysore

Adi Saiva Sivachariyargal Nala Sangam and Ors. The Government of Tamil Nadu and Ors.
Rev. Stainislaus State of Madhya Pradesh and Ors The Commissioner Hindu Religious
Endowments, Madras Shri Lakshmindra Thritha Swaminar of Sri Shirur Mutt
Sastri Yagnapurushadji and Ors Muldas Bhudardas Vaishya and Anr,
M. Ismail Frauqui and Ors Union of India (UOI) and Ors
I. The Himaya Temple is of a public character.

EXCLUSIONARY PRACTICE IS NOT AN ESSENTIAL PRACTICE AS PER THE RELIGION

Sri Venkataramana Devaru and others State of Mysore

Deoki Nandan Murlidhar
Radhakanta Deb and Ors Commissioner of Hindu Religious Endowments, Orissa

Narayan Bhagwantrao Gosavi Balajiwale Gopal Vinayak Gosavi and Ors, supra
Bihar State Board Religious Trust, Patna Mahant Sri Biseshwar Das,
S.P. Mittal v. Union of India & Ors47
 Commissioner, Hindu Religious Endowments,
Madras v. Sri Lakshmindra Thirtha Swamiar of Sri Shirur Mutt.51
Sardar Syedna TaherSaifuddin Saheb v. State of
Bombay52
 Govindlalji State of Rajasthan,
Arya Vyasa Sabha Commr., H.R.E.,
Nallor Marthandam Vellalar Commr. Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments,
Jagadishwaranand . Commissioner of Police, SP Mittal Union of
India, Arya Vyasa Sabha Commr., H.R.E.,
Commissioner of Hindu Religious Endowments, Madras Lakshmindra Thirtha Swamiar of Shirur Mutt

Ratilal Panachand Gandhi . State of Bombay,

Brahmachari Sidheshwar Sai State of West BengaL,
Shastri Yagnapurushdasji
i. Absence of Common faith uniting the devotees.

Vishnu Mohini Shiva

Krishna Aravan
Mohini Hanumana Naistik Brahmachari

ii. Lack of a Common Organization

iii. No Distinct Name

Commissioner of Hindu Religious Endowments, Madras . Lakshmindra Thirtha Swamiar of Shirur Mutt

SP Mittal Union of India

Seminars in psychosexual disorders.
Transgenderism and the
psychiatrist Transgenderism: Facts and fictions

Handbook of Hindu Mythology. Oxford University Press

Supra
Ibid.
Alternatively,

Sri Venkatramana Devaru State of Mysore and Ors

PS Charya State of Madras Indian Constitutional Law,
Supra
Adi Saiva Sivachariyargal Nala Sangam and Ors Government of Tamil Nadu and Ors
Manoj Narula Union of India State of Gujarat Mirzapur Moti Kureshi Kassab
Jamat
Government of NCT of Delhi Union of India and Ors.
Navtej Singh Johar and Ors Union of India and Ors.
Rustom Cavasjee Cooper Union of India,
Maneka Gandhi . Union of India
B.1 Constitutional morality in matters of religion protects the Right of disciplines
Lord Jogeshwara.