Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1. Manila Memorial Park, Inc. vs Sec. of DSWD PRINCIPLES OF A SOUND TAX SYSTEM
- burial services are given 20% discount for (FAT)
senior citizen. (related cases: Luzon Super Drug
Corporation & Carlos SuperDrug Corporation 1. Fiscal Adequacy - revenues in the form of
case) taxes must be sufficient to expenses.
Sources of revenues must be adequate to
Gross Income - Deductions (here ang meet government expenditures, and other
tax deduction) = Taxable Income. public needs.
(Taxable income) x (tax rate) = income 2. Administrative Feasibility - Tax laws must
tax due. be capable of effective and efficient
Income tax due - tax credits = income tax enforcement. They must not obstruct
payable. (here ang tax credit) business growth and economic development.
3. Theoretical Justice - based on one’s ability
Petitioners said Grant of 20% discount to pay. A sound tax system must take into
using tax deduction as mode of recovery is a consideration the taxpayers’ ability to
power of eminent domain hence should be fully pay. Taxes must be reasonable, just, fair,
compensated. But SC held that 20% Senior and conscionable. The rule of taxation must
Cititzen discount is the exercise of Police be uniform and equitable. The State must
Power. Thus Taxation, can coincide with the evolve a progressive system of taxation.
Police Power of the State.
Cases
August 28, 2019 Issue 1: Is MCIAA a gocc? Or gov
instrumentality?
Facts: Sison is the tax payer, Ancheta Are not contracts between the parties,
BIR commissioner. 2 tax payers: purely either express or implied; but they are positive
compensation income (0-35%) and business or acts of the government through its various
professional income (5-60%). agents, binding upon the inhabitants, and to the
making and enforcing of which their personal
Issue: Why does business/prof income consent individually is not required;
have higher imposition of tax rates?
Taxes cannot be assigned as debts, or
Held: There is substantial distinction: be proved in bankruptcy as such; nor, if
Taxpayers who are recipients of compensation uncollected, are the assets which can be seized
income are set apart as a class. As there is by attachment or other judicial processes, and
practically no overhead expense, these subjected to the payment of municipal
taxpayers are not entitled to make deductions for indebtedness;
income tax purposes because they are in the
same situation more or less. On the other hand, Taxes are not the subject of set-off
in the case of professionals in the practice of their wither of the state or the municipality for which
calling and businessmen, there is no uniformity they are imposed, or of the collector, or on behalf
in the costs or expenses necessary to produce of the person taxed, as against such state,
their income. It would not be just then to municipality or collector;
disregard the disparities by giving all of them zero
deduction and indiscriminately impose on all Taxes do not draw interest, as do sums
alike the same tax rates on the basis of gross of money owing upon a contract.
income. There is ample justification then for the
Batasang Pambansa to adopt the gross system Case:
of income taxation to compensation income,
while continuing the system of net income 1. Francia v. IAC
taxation as regards professional and business
income. Held: Legal compensation requirements:
due, demandable and fully liquidated. No legal
compensation because Francia and govt are not
Tax vs Toll Fees (distinctions) debtors and creditors of each other. Also, the
govt cannot wait for the ruling of the court before
Toll is a demand of proprietorship, an asking for the tax.
amount charged for the cost and maintenance of
the property used; Tax is a demand of
sovereignty for the purpose of raising public 2. Domingo vs Garido.
revenues.
Opposite of Francia case. Govt indebted
Case: to Pryce for services rendered.
Issue: Are tollway fees considered tax on Held: Yes. Exception ni. The General
tax? Rule: Tax is not subject to legal compesation.
Fully liquidated because naa na ordinance to
Held: No, tollway fee not a tax. appropriate funds. NOTE. MAO RAGYUD NI
ANG EXCEPTION IN THE HISTORY OF PHIL assessment a tax.
JURISPRUDENCE. GENERAL RULE GHAPON
GAMITON.
Case:
2. Planters Products, Inc. vs. Fertiphil Corp.
1. Tolentino vs. Sec. of Finance
Held: The Court has exclusive appellate
Issue 1: On violation on the ground na jurisdiction mao dapat RTC jud magstart.
dapat muoriginate sa House fo Representatives
and ultimately ang ma approve dapat kato orig
version.
Also take note of actually, directly, and 1. Direct double taxation (Also called: direct
exclusively used. duplicate taxation, double taxation in the
obnoxious sense, etc)
6. TAX FOR SPECIAL FUND. Art VI sec 29. Held: Yes there is direct double taxation.
Described as "direct duplicate taxation," the two
Sec 29. … (3) All money collected on any taxes must be imposed on the same subject
tax levied for a special purpose shall be matter, for the same purpose, by the same taxing
authority, within the same jurisdiction, during the favourable than the treatment they provide under
same taxing period; and the taxes must be of the other treaties in areas covered by the clause.
same kind or character.
2. British American Tobacco vs Camacho
Q: Is double taxation prohibited under the 1987
constitution? Facts: Classification freeze provision
A: No. double taxation is not prohibited, no provides that those existing brands shall not be
express prohibition. However, if the double affected by the new law. In the future pa sila
taxation will amount to a direct double affected.
taxation, then it shall be violative of the
constitution. It violates constitutional Issue: Does the provision violate equal
mandate such as due process and equal protection clause?
protection clauses. Indirect double taxation is
allowed. Held: No. As long as complied with the 4
requisites on equal protection. Not
discriminatory, no unfair competition because the
Q: if you have a leased property. Subject na xa price is not the sole factor in buying the product.
to 4 taxes: VAT, income tax, community tax, real
property tax. 1st 2 taxed by national govt. 3 and
4 taxed by local government. Is there a violation 3. DEUTSCHE BANK OF MANILA vs CIR
of direct double taxation?
A: No. Different taxing authorities. Facts: Bank based in Germany. They
wanted to avail of the lower preferential rate of
the tax treaty. However, RR order of BIR which
What is international juridical double requires na before ka mu avail pursuant to a tax
taxation? treaty, dapat mu file ka ug application for this.
Deutsche bank, cannot avail daw kay wala daw
International juridical double taxation is ni file ahead.
defined as the imposition of comparable taxes in
two or more states on the same taxpayer in Issue: Sakto ba na need ug prior
respect of the same subject matter and for applicaiton for tax relief?
identical periods.
Held: Pursuant to pacta sunt servada,
It is an indirect double taxation because we need to follow the treaty. Since wala
2 different taxing authorities. requirement ang tax treaty for prior application,
hence BIR should not impose additional
requirement before maka avai. Pwede naa
Cases: application but for confirmation purposes nalang
if makaapply sa treaty.
1. Commissioner vs SC Johnson
Facts: filed tax for refund kay under the TAX PAYER SUIT
RP-US tax treaty, lower dapat ang preferred tax.
Ang SC Johnson USA ma double tax. Cases:
Q: what is the most favored nation clause? Held: Tax payer suit is an exception to
A: dapat tanan countries should be treated alike. the locus standi principle. The prevailing doctrine
This must involve 2 tax treaties. If mu invoke ka in taxpayer’s suits is to allow taxpayers to
ug 1 tax treaty dapat naa pud lain ma compare. question contracts entered into by the national
- forge a link between taxation government or government-owned or controlled
agreements by ensuring that the parties to one corporations allegedly in contravention of law.
treaty provide each other with treatment no less
Three (3) instances wherein a taxpayer Taxes that are illegally collected, later on
is allowed to sue are: barred by statute of limitations for purposes of
1. where there is a claim that public refund. The new taxes must be set off by the
funds are illegally disbursed, or previously uncollected refund.
2. that public money is being deflected to
any improper purpose, or Where a claim for tax refund or credit is
3. that there is a wastage of public funds filed beyond the prescriptive period it can still be
through the enforcement of an invalid or applied against other taxes that may be due.
unconstitutional law.
In this doctrine you can still recover tax
Significantly, a taxpayer need not be a refund not previously collected not based on law
party to the contract to challenge its validity. but based on equity. Applies only in common law
countries. Not the philippines.
Q: Difference between tax payer suit and Citizen
suit and Class suit
4. Vinzons-Chato vs Fortune Tobacco.
Citizen suit - lawsuits that are brought by
individuals or nonprofit groups under the Held: Issuance of the RMC based on her
provisions of certain environmental laws. capacity of a public officer. Even if the re is later
Taxpayer suit - dapat naa showing na an issuance of its invalidity, dli dapat idamay ang
naa illegal disbursement of public funds. public officer na ni issue if no showing of malice.
Class suit - kailangan murepresent sila
ug certain class in such a number na impossible
to include all as petitioners.
- one in which a group of people Difference between TAX AMNESTY and TAX
with the same or similar injuries caused by the EXEMPTION
same product or action sue the defendant as a
group. Tax Amnesty - giving a tax payer a fresh
start with a clean slate. I overlook ang penalties.
Q: If donation from private sources, once PRELIMS - start (all topics and cases) plus
donated to govt., Do you think dli ma convert to Topic Outline of II (A-H), RA 10021. 3:30-
public funds? 5:30pm.
A: No settled jurisprudence. Ikaw na lang defend.
Case digest no. 2 submit on sunday. ABAKADA
Guro vs Ermita
3. Maceda vs Macaraig
Next Wednesday assignment: II and III (a-h).
Held: In case of doubt, you must prove Cases 1- 7.
that you are entitled to the exemption under the
law.
Case
INCOME TAX
1. Sec of Finance vs Oro Maura Shipping
Lines
- characterstics: si a direct, ad valorem,
national,
- tax on income Income Tax has only 2 types of taxpayers:
1. Individual taxpayer
Income - anything that flows into the taxpayer, 2. Corporate Taxpayer
other than a mere return of capital.
NRANETB Y X
SEC 23 - most imp provision of the NIRC
DC Y Y
SEC. 23. General Principles of Income
Taxation in the Philippines. - Except when
otherwise provided in this Code: RFC Y X
(A) A citizen of the Philippines
residing therein is taxable on all income NRFC Y X
derived from sources within and without the
Philippines;
(B) A nonresident citizen is taxable
only on income derived from sources within
the Philippines; Sa exam, ayaw paghimo table, I explain lang.
(C) An individual citizen of the
Philippines who is working and deriving What to determine if taxable worldwide:
income from abroad as an overseas contract NATIONALITY, RESIDENCE, SOURCE
worker is taxable only on income derived OF THE INCOME
from sources within the Philippines:
Provided, That a seaman who is a citizen of Next meeting: section 23 in correlation of
the Philippines and who receives section 42. Focus to section 42.
compensation for services rendered abroad
as a member of the complement of a vessel Read up to III - letter O.
engaged exclusively in international trade Cases: Read up to III number 14.