You are on page 1of 4

[Downloaded free from http://www.meajo.org on Wednesday, January 9, 2019, IP: 112.215.151.

168]

Case Report

Management of Paradoxical Response in Pediatric


Tubercular Meningitis with Methylprednisolone
Nitin Nema, Abha Verma, Kuldeep Singh1, Virendra Mehar1

ABSTRACT Access this article online


Website:
Paradoxical response to anti‑tubercular drugs remains a diagnostic dilemma. In India where www.meajo.org
tuberculosis is quite prevalent, paradoxical response to anti‑tubercular treatment (ATT) is DOI:
either misdiagnosed or under‑diagnosed. We report two cases of optochiasmatic arachnoiditis 10.4103/0974-9233.129775
due to paradoxical response in children suffering from tuberculous meningitis. Visual acuity
Quick Response Code:
was recorded as no light perception in all eyes of both patients while they were taking 4‑drug
ATT (isoniazid, rifampicin, pyrazinamide and ethambutol). However their systemic conditions
did not worsen. They were treated with intravenous methylprednisolone for five days followed
by systemic corticosteroids on a tapering dose for four weeks along with ATT. This case report
highlights the importance of early recognition of this sight‑threatening complication and
timely, effective treatment to prevent permanent blindness.

Key words: Anti‑Tubercular Treatment, Intravenous Methylprednisolone, Optochiasmatic


Arachnoiditis, Paradoxical Response, Tubercular Meningitis

INTRODUCTION due to a paradoxical response to ATT and the successful


management of these cases.

T he incidence of tuberculosis is quite high in India. 1


Tuberculous meningitis (TBM) is the most devastating form
of extrapulmonary tuberculosis in children,2,3 especially males.4,5
CASE REPORTS

Therefore, TBM is an important cause of optochiasmatic Case 1


arachnoiditis (OCA) in the Indian subcontinent.6 A six‑year‑old male, who was fully immunized and his
vaccinations were current, was treated for stage II TBM for one
OCA is an inflammation around the optic chiasm and optic month, with good response, developed profound diminution
nerves. This inflammatory involvement of anterior visual of vision. He was on oral 4‑drug ATT, that comprised
pathway results in marked exudation in the leptomeninges6 of isoniazid (5 mg/kg/day), rifampicin (10 mg/kg/day),
seen on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as basal exudates, pyrazinamide (25 mg/kg/day) and ethambutol (15 mg/kg/day),
which are most prominent around the optic chiasm.7,8 It and systemic steroids (1 mg/kg/day) on a tapering dose.
may occur during the course of neurotuberculosis or as a The visual acuity was no light perception in both eyes. The
paradoxical response to anti‑tubercular treatment (ATT).6,9 anterior segment examination was unremarkable except
OCA leads to profound visual impairment and, without timely for semi‑dilated pupils, which were not reactive to light.
diagnosis and effective treatment, it may cause irreversible The fundus examination showed slight disc hyperemia with
blindness.6,10 well‑defined margins bilaterally. Brain magnetic resonance
imaging (MRI) showed extensive enhancing basal exudates
Reports of OCA are rare in the literature particularly in pediatric along with dilatation of lateral and third ventricles and
patients. We report two cases of OCA who developed blindness obstruction at the aqueductal level [Figure 1]. A diagnosis of

Departments of Ophthalmology, 1Pediatrics, Sri Aurobindo Institute of Medical Sciences, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India
Corresponding Author: Dr. Nitin Nema, Department of Ophthalmology, SAIMS, 55 Shri Nagar Main, Indore ‑ 452 018, Madhya Pradesh, India.
E‑mail: nemanitin@yahoo.com

Middle East African Journal of Ophthalmology, Volume 21, Number 2, April - June 2014 189
[Downloaded free from http://www.meajo.org on Wednesday, January 9, 2019, IP: 112.215.151.168]

Nema, et al.: Management of Paradoxical Response with Methylprednisolone

paradoxical tuberculous OCA was made on the basis of MRI ophthalmoscopic examination showed a normal fundus.
findings, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis (cells 910/cu mm, Six days postoperatively, the child was referred back to us by
protein 230 mg/dL, glucose 30 mg/dL, Pandy test positive), the pediatric surgeon with complaints of bilateral loss of vision.
and clinical findings. Under cover of ATT, intravenous The child was on 4‑drug ATT (isoniazid 5 mg/kg/day, rifampicin
methylprednisolone (IVMP), 30 mg/kg body weight/day, was 10 mg/kg/day, pyrazinamide 25 mg/kg/day and ethambutol
administered. After three doses the visual acuity increased 15 mg/kg/day) but not on systemic steroids. The visual acuity
to light perception in both eyes. IVMP was continued for at this visit was no fixation or following of light. There was no
two more days and then the medication was changed to oral light perception in both eyes with absence of pupillary reaction
prednisolone tablets (2 mg/kg body weight/day in single to light. Fundus examination by indirect ophthalmoscope
dose) on a tapering schedule for a month. The vision slowly and 78 D slit‑lamp ophthalmoscopy showed normal fundi
improved over a period of 12 weeks. Seven months after bilaterally. Brain MRI showed enhancing lesions at the level
the visual loss, brain MRI showed decreased inflammation of optic chiasm involving both the optic nerves. A diagnosis
of the meningeal sheaths around the optic nerves and mild of paradoxical OCA was made on the basis of the clinical
hydrocephalus [Figure 2]. ATT was stopped after 12 months. picture, CSF analysis (cells 120/cu mm, 90% lymphocytes,
At the 18 months follow‑up visit, the best corrected vision protein 20 mg/dL) and neuroimaging findings. The child was
was 6/18 in right eye and 6/12 in the left. The pupils in both started on 30 mg/kg body weight IVMP for five days and then
eyes were approximately 4 mm in diameter round and briskly placed on systemic prednisolone (2 mg/kg body weight/day)
reactive to torch light. Fundus examination showed optic disc on tapering dose along with systemic ATT. Two weeks after
pallor bilaterally [Figure 3]. starting systemic corticosteroids, the child started to perceive
light on vision testing. ATT was stopped after a year and the
Case 2
best corrected visual acuity at that time was 6/18 in both eyes.
A four‑year‑old male child, fully immunized and his vaccinations
The pupils were round, semi‑dilated with brisk reaction to light.
were current, had stage I TBM with hydrocephalus, was
Fundus examination showed prominent temporal pallor of the
on oral ATT for three weeks. He underwent surgery for
ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VP shunt) under general optic nerve head in both eyes [Figure 4]. Magnetic resonance
anesthesia after his systemic condition stabilized. Preoperative imaging of the brain showed VP shunt in situ with no evidence
of exudate in the optochiasmatic region.

Figure 1: Contrast‑enhanced MRI brain showing enhancing basal exudates in the


perichiasmal region (arrow) with moderate dilatation of lateral and third ventricles Figure 2: Contrast‑enhanced MRI brain seven months after initiation of treatment
and aqueductal obstruction showing decreased exudates around the optochiasmatic region (arrow)

a b a b
Figure 3: a and b. Diffuse bilateral optic disc pallor Figure 4: Optic discs of right (a) and left (b) eyes showing pallor

190 Middle East African Journal of Ophthalmology, Volume 21, Number 2, April - June 2014
[Downloaded free from http://www.meajo.org on Wednesday, January 9, 2019, IP: 112.215.151.168]

Nema, et al.: Management of Paradoxical Response with Methylprednisolone

DISCUSSION ATT. The rationale behind the use of adjuvant steroids lies in
reducing the harmful effects of inflammation as anti‑tubercular
Tuberculosis is a common cause of morbidity and mortality in drugs kill the organisms.9 Treatment with corticosteroids
developing countries such as India. TBM is the most serious decreases the basal exudates and stabilizes vision, and in some
form of TB in children below five years of age.2,3 There is cases improves vision.6
preponderance of the disease in male children.4,5
In this case report, the two children were responding well to
OCA refers to inflammatory changes with exudates in the ATT when they noticed profound vision loss. The first child was
leptomeninges around the optic chiasm and the optic nerve.6 receiving systemic steroid on a tapering dose while the second
Tuberculosis is endemic in India, hence, OCA can occur during child was on ATT only. Both cases were small male children with
the course of treatment for TBM or following withdrawal high protein content and cell count in the CSF who developed
of systemic steroids.6,9 OCA is the leading cause of visual paradoxical OCA. They responded well to intensive high‑dose
impairment in TBM.6,10 Early recognition of this condition and intravenous methylprednisolone and systemic corticosteroids
appropriate treatment can prevent further visual loss and, at with reasonably good final visual acuity.
least, salvage some functional vision.6
CONCLUSION
A reliable method of establishing the diagnosis of OCA includes
visual complaints, abnormal pupillary reactions to light, dilated Ophthalmologists and pediatricians should be aware of the
fundus examination with special attention on the examination of paradoxical response to ATT. One must predict OCA in children
optic nerve head and contrast‑enhanced MRI. Dense plaque‑like suffering from TBM who present with severe visual loss without
basal exudates especially around the optic chiasm are seen on systemic deterioration and with high CSF protein and pleocytosis
MRI that show enhancement and hypertrophy of the chiasm and perichiasmal exudates on MRI. Prompt treatment with
and proximal optic nerves.11 These features may be associated IVMP followed by oral steroid may salvage vision in these
with hydrocephalus.6 children.

Paradoxical reaction is defined as appearance of fresh symptoms, REFERENCES


physical and radiological signs in a patient who had shown
improvement with ATT.9 It may present while the patient is on 1. Chakraborty AK. Epidemiology of tuberculosis: Current status
ATT and steroids.6 It can occur as early as 2 weeks and as late in India. Indian J Med Res 2004;120:248‑76.
2. Maltezou HC, Spyridis P, Kafetzis DA. Extra‑pulmonary
as 18 months after the initiation of ATT.12 Paradoxical response
tuberculosis in children. Arch Dis Child 2000;83:342‑6.
must be differentiated from drug‑resistant tuberculosis where 3. Weir MR, Thorton GF. Extra‑pulmonary tuberculosis.
there is a worsening of the patient symptoms. In the absence of Experience of a community hospital and review of the literature.
specific CSF findings and negative culture report, the diagnosis Am J Med 1985;79:467‑78.
of paradoxical deterioration depends mainly on close clinical 4. Udani PM, Parekh UC, Shah PM, Naik PA. B.C.G. test in
tuberculosis. Indian Pediatr 1971;8:143‑50.
monitoring.12 5. Benkappa DG, Chandrashekhar SK, Chandrashekhar P,
Kakkur M, Bhargava Krishna M. Tuberculous meningitis: Review
The paradoxical response to ATT is an exaggerated host-organism of 50 cases. Indian Pediatr 1975;12:1161‑7.
interaction resulting in massive inflammation.12,13 Effective 6. Anupriya A, Sunithi M, Maya T, Goel M, Alexander M,
treatment with ATT leads to revival of the host’s immune system. Aaron S, et al. Tuberculous optochiasmatic arachnoiditis.
Neurol India 2010;58:732‑5.
Additionally, the death of M. tuberculosis causes activation and
7. Dastur DK, Lalitha VS, Udani PM, Parekh U. The brain and
accumulation of lymphocytes and macrophages at the site of meninges in tuberculous meningitis‑Gross pathology in
bacterial deposition or toxin production.12 This is predominantly 100 cases and pathogenesis. Neurol India 1970;18:86‑100.
seen in the basal region of the brain implicating the optic chiasm 8. Garg RK, Paliwal V, Malhotra HS. Tuberculous optochiasmatic
and optic nerves. arachnoiditis: A devastating form of tuberculous meningitis.
Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther 2011;9:719‑29.
9. Monga PK, Dhaliwal U. Paradoxical reaction in tuberculous
The management of OCA remains a challenge and prognosis in meningitis resulting in involvement of optic radiation. India J
most of the cases remains poor.14 Systemic oral corticosteroids, Ophthalmol 2009;57:139‑41.
IVMP, 6 intrathecal hyaluronidase, 15 thalidomide 16 and 10. Sinha MK, Garg RK, Anuradha HK, Agarwal A, Singh MK,
microsurgical scraping of exudates have been used to treat Verma R, et al. Vision impairment in tuberculous meningitis:
Predictors and prognosis. J Neurol Sci 2010;290:27‑32.
OCA with variable results.
11. Silverman IE, Liu GT, Bilaniuk LT, Volpe NJ, Galetta SL.
Tuberculous meningitis with blindness and perichiasmal
The treatment of OCA due to paradoxical reaction includes involvement on MRI. Pediatr Neurol 1995;12:65‑7.
high‑dose systemic corticosteroids along with continuation of 12. Gupta M, Bajaj BK, Khwaja G. Paradoxical response in

Middle East African Journal of Ophthalmology, Volume 21, Number 2, April - June 2014 191
[Downloaded free from http://www.meajo.org on Wednesday, January 9, 2019, IP: 112.215.151.168]

Nema, et al.: Management of Paradoxical Response with Methylprednisolone

patients with CNS tuberculosis. J Assoc Physicians India meningitis. Acta Neurol Scand 1980;62:368‑81.
2003;51:257‑60. 16. Schoeman JF, Andronikou S, Stefan DC, Freeman N, van
13. Zaki SA, Shenoy P. Paradoxical response to anti‑tubercular Toom R. Tuberculous meningitis‑related optic neuritis:
treatment. Indian J Pharmacol 2011;43:212‑3. Recovery of vision with thalidomide in 4 consecutive cases.
14. G o u r i e ‑ D e v i   M . O p t o c h i a s m a t i c a r a c h n o i d i t i s a n d J Child Neurol 2010;25:822‑8.
neurotuberculosis. Prognostic indicators and therapeutic
strategies. Neurol India 2010;58:714‑5. Cite this article as: Nema N, Verma A, Singh K, Mehar V. Management of
paradoxical response in pediatric tubercular meningitis with methylprednisolone.
15. Gourie‑Devi M, Satish P. Hyaluronidase as an adjuvant in
Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol 2014;21:189-92.
the treatment of cranial arachnoiditis (Hydrocephalus and
Source of Support: Nil, Conflict of Interest: None declared.
optochiasmatic arachnoiditis) complicating tuberculous

192 Middle East African Journal of Ophthalmology, Volume 21, Number 2, April - June 2014

You might also like