anaes "Way Lay Foon lp SOR Enact Tony tat JETS OF LIGHT ‘THE TRUTH THAT JESUS I THE SON OF GOD Ah etsflight ora) ABOUT US (HITP“/WHUIJETSOFLIGH.ORG/ABOUT-US/) HEALTH (HTTPJ/WWWJETSOFLIGHT ORG/CATEGORY/HEALTH/) SEARCH BY NAME SEARCH BY BOOK ~ RESOURCES (HTTPL/WIJETSOFLIGHTORG/RESOURCES/) ‘CONTACT us (HITPv/WNWJETSOFLIGH. ORG/CONTAGT-US/) HOME (HTP:/MWWJETSOFLIGHT.ORG)» LEROY FROOM Enter yourkeyword.. — Q (HTTP://WWWJETSOFLIGHT.ORG/CATEGORY/PEOPLE/LEROY: mall Address FROM] » MOVEMENT OF DESTINY ——— (4TTP://WwWiJETSOFLIGHT.ORG/CATEGORY/BOOKS/MOVEMENT-OF. Fret Name —— DDESTINY/) » SEARCH BY NAME LastName {HTTP://WHW¥JETSOFLIGHT.ORG/CATEGORY/PEOPLE/}»7 WAYS LEROY *srequled fel FROOM HELPED SOA'S EMBRACE THE TRINITY subscribe (HTTP://WWW¥JETSOFLIGHT.ORG/7-WWAYS-LEROY.FROOM-HELPED-SDAS. ara tines EMBRACE-THE-TRINITY/) POPULAR POSTS 7 Ways LeRoy Froom Helped SDA’s Embrace the Trinity 1 November 10.2016 Unep:tmnetsotighterg/amaz decoverestenty)) ‘Amazing Discoveries Trinity (ntip:wmurjetsofight orgie discoveries-vinity/) nip mn jetsotigntorg/chap: f-daniebandshe-revelaton revisions-1904-s-198e/) Chapter 01 ~ Daniel and the Revelation Revisions 1908 vs 1948 (nteps imu jetsofight.ora/c -daniel-and-the revelation-revisions-1908- vest94a)) Usted below are seven ways Lefoy Froom worked to bring the Tein dectrine Inte acceptance nthe Seventh-day Advent church, 1. He compiled the book “Evangelism” (1946) Usps fasnetsettgntorythe retutrteljah-book-necto-be pneu atgarg nye etn napacacaarrnethasy sine1g Loy Foon BOOK “EVANGELISM” PLAYS VITAL PART.—"Later, when I connected with the Ministerial Association of the General Conference, | dd considerable reccorch inthe Sir of Prophecy rings on this subject, and found much more When we were asked ‘otslp compiling she book Euanyelium thse and many other counsel became a vital part ofthat book, Note the section ‘The Message and les Presentation (pp. 188-216) LeRoy Froom, Movement of Destiny p 621 ‘one ofthe most pepular books that Adventists use ta prove tat Elen White believed the Tenty doctrine i the compilation known 38 “Evangelism.” Freom \wasinflveriain the cormpiatio, ‘Side headings n bold type have Ben supplied by the compilers (Preface from the book Evangelism) Example of side headings: “The Eternal Dignitaries of the Triniy” Evangelism psi6 Fer more information vst ‘Te Deception of LeRoy Freer and his book Evangelism Ahepulfwritytruthergleoytroomandevangelsm nent) 2. He wrote the pro-trinitarian book entitled "Coming of the Comforter - Studies on the Coming and Work of the Third Person of the Godhead” (1928) {In 1960, Froom sent a etter to Otto Christensen in which he gives ut evidence thai ash (Froom) personal effort that helped to bring about his change belie about he Hoy Spi within Seventhday Adventiom, thos ue cleary to that the pionere did rot accep thatthe Holy Sprit isa person like God and Christ, also that there was declded resistance to this change. This is when Froom tld in hs leter ‘May Istee that my book, JHB COMING OF THE COMFORTER mas the eal ofa series of studien that L gave in 1927 = 1928, 1 ‘ainteriaintntes thoughout North America You cannot maine ow Lot pummelled hy same ofthe aliens because resco the personality ofthe Holy Sprit the hind person of the ‘Godhead (1. Froom, letter t Oto Christentor, 27th October 1960) Ie then ad "Some men denied that - til don it. But he ook has come 1 be general accep as stud” (bid) room saying here that whist sme ail deny thatthe Holy Spirit a personal being (ike Gad and Chris) his concept, at fend in his book “The Coming ofthe Comforter had by 1960 become the standard norm) within Seventh-day Advention but when he had mroduced this thought nthe late 1920 (1927-1928) he sai that he was ‘pummelled by some othe l-timers” Obviously, hese old imers” were those who believed inthe thology of Seventh-day Advent whilst Elen White was alive, Thi was when the Holy Spirit was not deemed 0 bea person like God and Christ but was the omnipresence of them hath when hey (God and Christ) were not ‘hysicll (bodily) present Tern Hil, hap /theprophewilopeas coal Detis%SCerDHSH him (up iheprophtatlspeatsca akiDetHia?sSCorDHSA4 im) 3, He encouraged Seventh-day Adventists to look to outside sources for information regarding the Holy Spirit pneu atgarg nye etn napacacaarrnethasy 0h Emerton handed-outto-seventh-day- advertist)) ‘The Return OF Elijah Book Not To Be Handed Out To Seventh-day Adventists (tty: jetsoflght.orgit Feturn-of-eliah-book-not-to- besnanded-our-to-seventh day-adventists/) Ure rm etsotigntrghnye change-daietandhe revebton-bock) Why change Daniel and the Revelation Book? {rp:l ume jetsotight. org. ehange-dariebane-the- Fevelation-b00k/) Uhep:/iamnetsofigntera/danie nd-therevelaton-comparatve: sudychaptert)) Daniel and the Revelation Comparative study - Chapter * (ntip: wm jetsotight.org/e and:the-revelation= comparative-study-chapter- w) {ei /acts32.erandex he) ‘evesoomanbenearost EOREA ho earsies Aen orvoioson {2a eston asin HERayer reno ‘sername SipEMnjetsottghtorgtta CRAMPS naonenetsotightorgtta Region orgagienrse Rewer sratonaen {hepa jtsotight orgitaPERSONAL EXPERIENCE IN STUDY AND PRESENTATION.—May Benmisiftiebe aon ert | Ungpllnsetsotoh the Holy Sp, covering the North mercan nin minitril piles arose institutes of 1928, I found that, aside from priceless leads found in trate the Spt ef Prophecy the wa prety mthng in cur Hae erator rtaien tn There were no previous patindng Books onthe question itzp?/ wow jetsoflic ur erature. us came 0 search ota care af lle sobs wien men ouside of ou fh those previ acted Wibitefesotonrghanenat ‘env personal stay: Having these, nent onfom the Bet ey domeestirggtae the wer decided earl hls. nd sores ft nde cod ansafaurana.nen hd onthe Holy Spirit andthe ramon WEF eniesortnorita ie essa angel obcie theme LeRoy Froom, Movement of Destiny, p.322 Ahttaidhwww.jetsoflight. La sat aston 4, He taught Seventh-day Adventists to embrace and listen to evangelical pastors on the doctrine of the teRaysRPabHTeMneIe Trinit Y (hitpsdd wren jetsoflic ontibaon tee speci else fy men cond eal be EegAFAejesorighorata ated the cesng decades of the nineteenth andthe opening ehh erghaginose decades ofthe trenteth centuries—tmen like Maran, Sinpaon, Scroggie, Howden, Smith, McKensie, Mefnash, Brooks, Dion Ke, Morgan, Needham, Person, Sess, Thomas, West and ascore of Aydircutat erates thrall giving this general emphasis. Untold numbers have feeterigereretnras Anown and een blessed by ther writings. dnd this includes many of Het RENBlongn jetsoflight ‘aur own men. Those men did not understand ou pecic message veseng ‘But they did now God. and His Word, on these inperativ spiritual PIRIRGINAERD orate themes. They were clearly among Gods “reserves,” ls “ther shepherds, Hs augmenting votes, sounding challenging note eigen eetomaranienns when “rome” four own men hesitated paralleing ad giving Similar emphasis nthe great spiral awakening outside our own SEG octane Movement They were obviusy designed to supplement and nigment, and to stimult ll. They made their contrition Spree tears LeRoy Froom, Movement of Destin, p.320 Setverd{noawyisten eh oyna renee He daeepeldavwwjetsot drew Murray Tefghof etic ad eign lca de Aayoadwaptistphsor (rtps/enwkipeca goof heen lah. reise) hat which be works Aer Benamnmunateanng oe erg meer cicemanaitce ARB AEyHotlht ora Simpson {tierch olen ome erence cncisions adh it (rmpfen kp. tated intra dhotctnssnked with theses tht (hott: i Ny” gua on neem Grttp://www.jc reps fenwhipesi son preysJorenetoorafestPuron mid sues Hoten which ee vey mtresing and hich are lof cee {riarresrrft ttm Frederick. Meyer mystery Intheinesigaton of hse ube men oe edo 5 (ntps://enkipedia.amgbateffofotmgantusions and to unite with seducing {iit Www jetsoflic Mesel Spits nthe mor propeundng new theres whch od waht Moody awoy rom ne tth (7673 BRIE pMestom arasiacin (rep fenwhpesiacrgiwiOwigh Moods) wath nee nae ch ele snes xed he Aesedbeeerston acer Or. Wrohem teen by out mits eecher ard eos wh thet seragaie r m the bel Wieerrreretorararaainacar (rp hv blevertianeretfaane in prince a: he teaching fhe Ieets4&re-taist-mulsbii of uth The Book Uving Temples on lustaton of SEB dvamancietsoftight.or Joseph Russel hs work thew of whch dered ins support thet Howden teachings were the same as those found inthe writings of NEA orate oxttantwere (rtp emt te spon ond oie sl be cleo met te moral.net/pdf/great- influence of men who are studying sciences of satanic origin, December 2016 Preschoreznissel” tought sian worting to mole gnanentvef Gad (Rw etsoflgnerg/2016, Rowena) andar cht Elen Whe Testmones Volume 39.681 November 206 fete rr 09) tht west or 2016 nt onipein SA ig 1 Tengyis making october 2016 traps fennpe SOE ES PEEL Tce rex cook Toto or 2016 cee antosn Chest andthe Tony (hes: fwwwetsolghtorglevist ponent wey tn-napacacesarenctasrnty anesane ap ay John Brooks riny-twefoundations. worship. (rps foecksgooglecafoooks? September 2016 IedesavuxoQPragClpgePAt71 Bosse, nSzPubda-brockswZOkeswicknzOhelyapa-PATTBUUR SS ERUSTRRIHE hon. ookstttalse) 0h Emer Tt ot Ln Ac. OHen Aug 2016 Crpsen stipes or kIA.C.00.0n) Chioinejtsefightorg 2016, ‘le Moran June 2016 Neca Crofton jetetant.org 2015, Artur Tappan vsy2016 Frevon tht jtsotin.rg 2016, {re enakpei crit Tappan Person) sess Aont2016 own ati trtotnenietsotiantoro 2016 ‘hemes Moren20%6 Crpsienseknei orowiliamitt.Thomss) Tere seotgnter2016 wes November2015 Chin tetightorg 205, Sepemoer2015 5, He was a member of the General Conference pi fvaeneteflgh.og/2015, Committee who voted to go forward in revising Uriah (pet ional Smith's book “Daniel and the Revelation” because ame peers rather than aligning with the doctrine of the Trinity, it yetsottantorsi2015y expressed a decidedly anti-trinitarian understanding of yas expressed a decidedly 9 oF a tin a8 Iune205 Usted below are the General Conference meeting minutes regarding the revsion (hp anetsflight.org (2015, ‘ofthe book “Daniel and Revelation” by Uriah Sith Click on each picture to “Sowmioas the aiginal meeting minutes in POF format fr your wn reference, tog in Autumn Council of the General Conference Committee __{hnip/wmmetsettghtora/back St Paul Minnesota, October 15-23, 1940 Enis BSS(Sealy smote ‘Also Meetings ofthe Committee, October 1,3, 78, 13 and 23, 1940, ‘hepfImwnetsofigneorgffeed) comments {oUR RINORED PIPTY-NTM: uSRTHG Sarees GENERAL CONPERBIE CoManTES ‘i yetsoflgntorglcome cevoder 3,3940 WordPress.org oe (nps:fwerdpress. orf) aoaisens PRESET veje ERNE Sey bree PE Bata Gertelzey ator Staten, dee Aaitas efhentlin, Sede eb fsfotinny B, {tel jetsofigh.org/wp-content/uploads/2096/11/6CC1940-10.Revising Danelanlthe-Revelation-Uriah-smithpof UESsLOMARY VOLUPTEER REGIONAL, MEETINGS: SNRETGRIESS Rute aan ara ere ts Torthors, Central an Gowuhroctahn Usiongy Deventer 3.8) the Soumnerns Goltia and Attantie Onions, Soceaber 16-825 tile ert gut Sar et fe tbs," Dhere nae quite e eletorgsse of opliuan of } of atteoptine fo revise tide book, After SES EAE Si tete Ggenopaa Contetense nd Ena" toots cf ibe three pulang See Renter Sy Sy {hepsi etsflightrg/wp-content/upleads/2006/11/GCCTS40-10-Revising Danstandtthe-Revelation-Uriah-Smith pal) Seventy-First Meeting General Conference Committee Janay 1, 1942 pneu atgarg nye etn napacacaarrnethasy"Way Lay Foon Vl SORs Enact Tony tat = orvemy-riaan umstrve corsa, courenance couneree January 3, 1042 sess sears Hegtagnen, Wi. Begoton, A keCormacy HT TLL ScSpieer, RAEWitone “Vaciting, epavees Fedetivere, WotesduatZentarg, Sine Cater tsfeslisey SF rene, lose, flctotn lahore Ey 8ctrgeore, Be EL talon, ihe tae ahings enone fs tesand HiScbetebuery EPraacitn, fo cepesesey {hes etsflight og/wp-content/upleads/2076/11/6CC1942-01 Revising Danhandithe-Revelaton-Uriah-Smth pa) January 2, 1942 DAeTSL AND REVELATION Question as to the repyblioetion of the took *Dessel soa Ravelatiea® ne beet up for soma. timos Te General Confer Shee Gonnitten at the tine’ of the 2040 Astuon ouno! apootnted round ttee congl sting ef the ammauers of the tree publishing fousee end the Goncrus Conference sfficers, go give stvention forthe Sringing out ef @ revises esition, stash has $m ture op~ sounten a Soe stan oy tho revdaton gf the bok. sinks son Biochat ot vet teudy to, foperie fhe Suthers mubltesing have resently printed, Tide Sducton seoteine some soy ig porbape hariog to do"mhin eg Stee Het tee el YOrRD, Tay a committee of ftv0 De eopotnted to novice poe, new Saltiin of" toanten end Rovelation® ee published by the Eesheia Publis Aasoetatten, ant ropors "beh esate domancss PaLtbLeos, Toes, onsen SSS {tes mn etsoigh.org/wo-contentJuploads/2016/11/6CC1942-01 Revising Danelanetthe-Revelation-Uriah-Smith pe ‘Seventy-Eighth Meeting General Conference Committee January 19,1942 ‘Dams, an REVELATION asmming Aotsoiniton for Spleate ofthe speoiad revised set tio it tbapser and Reyetation® which they have printed tot fo are ‘lor of the wore wtan tae bean dare’ Calloving the Ganerat Cor- Tetunee Goanituee conssceretion of the questicn of the mepuel t= cation of the beak, at the tae of the 1040 Auruan Couneil, The en Jenuary 18, 1048 evened thet the gomittee sppotntes to gtve further atudy to Ue Eninglng out of ner edf¢hon of *Dacfel” gra Revelation te sofeing én She nettor and plana to bave' ttn report ready te ait Erte He. of se gpring Monting ofthe Generel spteranee suchicees “In'vien of thie the Following astions were tacent YOrED, that the comittes ayscinted An our messing of osgiy Lp spiny tne Se pelated Oy the Shere Pants YorED, That, ve earnestly recomend to the soutnern Pubs sdestog Legoelation that thelr aiition of sDantol and Revelation® bocnitiheld from olroulstion pending decision on the report of Belconntee"appountes at tae ti’ of the Avon Copel of {hes etsightorg/wp-content/upleads/2006/11/6CC1942-01 Revising Danshandtthe-Revelation-Uriah-Smith pal) Autumn Council of the General Conference Committee ‘incinnas, Ohio, October 20-28, 1942 pneu atgarg nye etn napacacaarrnethasy{vay Lay Feom Helped SORs Ema te Tony tat a ee Revlon ana’ fenelSe th GE ie oar eas’ sonsinat fee ‘Hest our erauniay st vat augptaset ontal tn later youre 2h ne Ce eee reaeiitiag wnt eager pth Ei erie GT Pa Ae sera eobeorap ton ogy and at the Butuas Soarlt of 5G, ota SRE Seite ele eeu “QUG.Gstamoky llacélunden ane W.E.Sovell of tee enema Confer” rsa Janae Shulte of the Southern Fybltebtne Atsoctation, eof the ferion aud Hesal, gpd eran aot? of te ste gountetse ant angeteers hs yore ta’ Gafeioa, on An's sguree oF GehSp"sek Grotberty lovey tes foor Seine sone tr the San) Bab lReltipeshas'nelp an ste tase, sah apreosere soe entered fot mee beplonng ofthe sora tint an olf satire" sug doo” ould be recorded tobe Sarried gut until ff could Ge made” wages waotranh ene hoy ta"eari tara {tps etsflightorg/wp-content/upleads/2006/11/6CC1942-10-Revising Dansetandtthe-Revelation-Uriat-Smith pal) committe of leven vas Set yp to revise Uriah Smith's Danetand the Revelation volume. The committee was comprised of 4.14 Howell 20M, Wcox 3: HLM. Bhinden |. A.Wcormack 5... Read 6... eet 7.H.G.Chids 9.M.R. Thurber 1. Merin Net James Schutz Listed below isthe subcommittee of seven that the ral work on eting the book: WE Read 2.A.W. Cormack 5.1L Bunden 2.0. € Howl S.james Shute 6. Thurber T.Merln Nett Three Hundred Twentieth Meeting General Conference Committee September, 1983 "DAMESL, AHO REVILATTON"--aZ8OR REVESTON: HORED,_ aost Hic fduoden, UR, Marven, 3.8 Sdte, #2, September 2, 1983 {hvepd metsoightor/wp-contentfupleads/2016/11/6CC1983.08.evising Danel-andsthe-Revelation-Urah-Smthfroem pof) Autumn Council of the General Conference Committee ‘Grand Rapids, Mlclgan, November 12-20, 1945 pneu atgarg nye etn napacacaarrnethasy"Way Lay Foon VelpedSORs Enact Tony tat ESSER ene fel gba toe Be pggeerated an anculd Lave tne"meet pedatete Glnealatton at dnovssag atte pli’ cot omg igh ete Seren SHS Randel ang Se Beveasion oe jortption eantion of thts dock evailatle fer a geriod of Oo days 3 maar poatpnte mo cite ates mera ily, soe donee posted al hue egecial fase’ oun Fathone 3, That the Generel Conteronce asrange with the Review fan Hogal erfigs Se grasert a guriee of cuziine Waulegson te See teFpail and ie Resiecitat Sccogh th sohumne of he peign by faving ie genereus pubcicity Wireugh, speeiar art Roading vontons‘unguns sinner anchors te teke aavantone of {tepid fmyetsotightorg/wp-content/upleads|2006/11/6CC1945-11-AC Revising: Danehand-ne-Revelation-Ursh-Smith pa) Here are Ley Frooms ov words from his back ented “Movement of Destiny” regarding the revision of “Daniel and te Revelation” by Uriah Smith 1. Revision of Dante and the Revelation Inesiable 1. CORRECTION OF CERTAIN BOOKS NECESSARY —Phe nest logical and inevitable sep inthe implementing of our anid ‘Fundamental Beliefs" involved resision of certain standard works 50451 eliminate statements that taught, and thus perpetuated, rronsou views on the Godhead. Such sentiments were now sharply lat varionce with he accepted “Furdamental Bele set forth the (Church Manual. ond withthe uniform “Baptismal Covenant” and Yo" based thereon, whic, In certificate form, wus now used fr all candidates seeking admiston to membership in the church More than that, the unequivocal Spirit of Prophecy declarations onthe ternal pe-eitonce and complete Deity of Christ wore tally being contradicted though retention of contig sHatements suck standard books. These productions must therfore he brought into harmony withthe nw declared Faith of the Church The frst and most conspicuous of thee involved certain gxronsoue ‘Heclopicalconcens that had Tong appeared in Thoughts on Daniel land the Revelation by Uriah Smith who had died i 1908. Tis treatie, extecmed at a whol, first appeared, as we learned, the late 1860‘ and eoty1870%, It had therefore been imprint for ‘mare than seventy years, and had een accorded an honored place ‘roughout those years-and sill i, Moreover is unique place was recoprzed by Bllen White. (Ms 174, 1898) But she le sid thet errors in ou older iterate "call for careful study and correction (€.G. White, Me I 1910; 15M, p. 185. That was now applied LeRoy Broom, Movement of Destiny p42 Note:The complete paragraph of 15M p.165 reads gute liferently than Freon’ se word extraction from the writings of Elen White! “in some of our important books that have been in print for yeas, and which have brought many ta knowledge ofthe truth there may be fund matters of minor mporcance chat cal for caefu study and corecton, Let uch matters be ‘considered by those regularly appolnted co have the evetsight af eur publications. Le not these bretiven, nor our canvassers, nr our ministers ‘magnify these matters in such away aso lessen the influence of these good Ssoulsaving books. Should we ake up the work of eiscreciing our Iterature, we ‘would place weapone inte hands of these who have departed frm the ath and cenfuse the minds a those whe have newly embraced the message. The ess ‘thats done unnecessarily to change our publikatons, the beter wil be len Wiite, 15m 1652) From the tener of his book des it sound ke LeRoy Froom thought te Godhead was of miner importance? pneu atgarg nye etn napacacaarrnethasy{vaya Foon Hale SORs Enact Tony at 2. UNWARRANTED TRADITION HAD DEVELOPED Such an undertaking mean! treading on delicate ground To some of personal rem-Arianpersuavion—Daniel andthe Revelation was ‘oly ground as it were Some, particalrly n one geographca! are, sincerely et hat hs book as virtually “inspired. According tothe memory of 4. C. BOURDEAU,* Mr hie was reported o have declared, many years fore, that an angel siood by Smith’ side and guided his hand ashe penned is ‘pages. This forback recollection had developed into an alas sacred tradition with hs prop Bul it wa, fat only remembrance-writen many ears after the slated episode It was never however an E.G, White testimony Soin 1944-00 ater the adoption of the uniform Baptismal Covenant, Vow. ond Certfeate of 1941—the revision of "DAR" (si was family brown, was undertaken A representative committe was stp thet included the book editors of the three main North American publishing houses. E Howell: secretary 1th president ofthe General Confrence— th extensive service baekground-—was named chara. Merwin Thurber, book editor ofthe Review ard Herald Publishing Associaton, served as secretary, rom whose records the fl facts have ben secure, 41 SCOPE AND LIMITATIONS OF REVISION—The fundamental, stsigament of the comme wart Bring the acts, sails, and {uotations of DAR upto dat, without material altering he prophetic exposition af the author ofthe volume. When the committe’ work was completed, the committee made its final report, 1 the Spring Council of 194, held in New York City. . H. Branson, _genral vce president ofthe General Conference athe ime as asked to make a covering statement in behalf ofthe commie. Ths was Because any revision of DAR was sal ahighly sensitive matter athe relatively small group stl personally holding the sem Ara view This writer was present athe council in New York, and percnaly heard the report, and observed what {followed Branson: remarks were tothe effec thatthe Book Dantel land the Revelation would ofcourse retain Uriah Smiths name as author The revision committee could not therefore righty change any distincnive Uriah Smith interpretation ef propheos—such as on the “dal,” the “hing ofthe north,” orth Huns a one ofthe tn Alvisions of Rome. Smiths interpretative views mus be respected and retained in his own book But where the authors variant ‘personal theological views on certain points appeared—such os Me Aran concept of the nature of Christ—these had een eliminated Decause they were (1) not am interpretation of prophecy. and (2) were te conflc with our acceped sateen! of “Fundamental Beliefs” of 1931, andits extension in the wniform Baptism Cerficate of 1941 But most serous of all hey were (3 si ie irec conflict with numerous statement in the Spirit of Prophecy rings that were leary on record in periodical article and book form, These statement wore ll writen nthe docade following ‘the writing of Smiths book—and especially nthe decade after his death He was therefore not acquainted with hem «4. STRONG REACTION OF SMITH ADHERENTS —Dhe reaction of the minarity who stil held personally tothe Arian view-—and who ‘regarded DAR as virtually inspired and therefore not o be soucked ‘rin any way altered was rather vehement. Reference was made 10 the aforementioned floating AC. Beurdean statement tothe effect ‘hat Ms. White had said tha a ange had puided hsp in the writing of D&R Such proestor kee cited the EG. White statement pronouncing a "woe" wpon thase who moved a peg tered api of our foundations (EW 258, 250)—but which statement ctually had reference tthe historical sequence ofthe First Second, and Third Messages. ‘The Council proceeded to approve the report ofthe Commitee. And the several Arian statements n Daniel and Revelaron were ccordingly eliminated. Thu the volume was Brought ito theological harmony with our "Fundamental Beli statement in the Yearbook and Church Manual, the Baprismal Covenant and Yow aswell as the declaration ofthe Spit of Prophecy on these pont ‘The revted Daniel and Revelation continues ta be circulated inthis Jorm pment ony ey napacacaarrnetsnyanaes "Way Lay Foon Helped SOR Ema te Tonya LeRoy Froom, Movement of Destiny p42 6. He met with Walter Martin (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Walter_Ralston_Martin) and Donald Barnhouse (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donald_Barnhouse). From these meetings with Mr. Froom and associates, Walter Martin became convinced we were a trinitarian church and were worthy of being in the category entitled “Evangelical Christianity.” According to Martin, the four leading charges commonly brought against Advent, deal with nhs aril, were 1) thatthe atonement of Crit war not completed pon the era (2) tha salvation ithe result of erace ps the works of hela (8) thatthe Lord Jesus Christ was a created being, not fom al (and that He partook of man’ sinful allen nature athe incarnation.” (Our Hope, November, 1956 p275) This, Martin said, sums up the four major misconptions concerning Adventom, held n scholarly religions lees LeRay Froom, Movement of Destiny pA73 ADVENTISTS ARE "MOST DECIDEDLY” CHRISTA ‘mentioned Canvight, and other “professional detractors or pesiout defectors”. 276, who are out to “prove that Seventh-day Adventists are not Christianswhiok they most decided ae a any honest pera oftheir erature onthe cardinal doctrines ofthe (Christian faith wil quickly reveal. (276) Martin Martin then lists, as evidence, our fundamental Christian bles hich accord with “historic orthodox Christianity": “Seventh-day Adventist elleve without reservation, and in the context of Mtorke orthodox Christianity, the following doctrines: (1) the complete authori ofthe Bible a the sole rule of faith and practice and the inorrant Word of Go £2) the virgin birth of hrs, (8) the eternal eniy and Deity of Ole (8 the personality ofthe Holy Spr (5) the perfet sinless human nature of Chr (0) the sinless fe and vicarious atoning death of our. Lard (the phytea resurrection and ascension of Cri: (8) His inercessory ministry fr man before the Father, (0) the second personal premilenial coming of Chit (410 the everlasting bs ofthe sant; (AL) the physical resurrection ofthe body (42 justification by faith alone; (13) the new eration (18) the unity ofthe Body of Chris, (15) salvation by grace apart from the works ofthe lw through faith in Jesus Christ” (2 276) ‘These points he otaled from our conferences and our iterate hoted i the succeeding chapter, {6 OUTSPOKEN BELIEF IN OUR "CHRISTIANITY. Then falls ‘his strong Marin declaration: if adherence ithe, orthodox once tthe prviouly enumerated ocrins ofthe Bible doesnt place one i the category of vangelical Christian then this writer fais see what woul bid) LeRoy Froom, Movement of Destiny p475-474 7. He co-authored the book “Seventh-day Adventists Answer Questions On Doctrine” which promoted a trinitarian viewpoint pneu atgarg nye etn napacacaarrnethasy{vaya Foon Hale SORs Enact Tony at Although no authors are listed onthe te of the Book fret i given 1 “a representative proup” of Adventist “leader, Bible leachers land editors), the primary contributors tthe Evin Broom, Walter E-Read. and Roy Allan Anderson (sometimes fered to as "FREDA") hp: Hen witpediaorghitluestion. (pen wikipedia org Questions_on Doctrine) Doctrine 1. That the Godhead, or Tins, const ofthe Berna Father persona, spiritual Being, amniporent omnipresent omniscient ‘inflate n wisdom and lve: the Lod Jeous Crit, the Son ofthe lernal Father rough hom all hings were created and rough whom the salation of the redeemed hosts will be ‘accomplished the Holy Spi the third person ofthe Godhead, the _reat regenerating ower i the work of redemption (Matt. 28:19) ‘Questions on Doctrine pt 2. That the Godhead, the Trini, comprises God the Father. Christ, 8. That the Serpowres ar the inspired revelation of God 0 men: and ‘hat the Bible isthe sole rule of fath and practice 4, That Sess Christi very Ga, and that He has ested with the Father fom al eternity 5. That he Holy Soi is a.personal being sharing the atrbates of ety with he Father andthe Som Questions on Doctrine, p.22 Question 4 11 frquently charged that Seventh davensets deny the actual ey and eternal preexstenceof Christ, the Bernal Word. his contention rue? Do you believe inthe Ten? Please give the Biblical bass for your beliefs 1 Believers in Dety of Christ and Trinity (Our belie in the deity and eternal pre-xistence of Christ the second person ofthe Godhes, i om cord in our “Fundamental Belief of Seventh-day Adventists,” appearing annually in our fetal Yearbook and nour authortanve Church Manual (1951 ed.pp. 29-36) Moreover, those who are baptised into the Adventist, (Church subscribe tothe “Summary of Doctrinal Belief" appoering on ou standard BapismalCertineae article 2 af whick reads: Jesus Christ, the second person ofthe Godhead and the eternal Son (2 God, i the only Saviour fom sn: and man’s salvation i by grace rough faith Hi, he candidate ign his statement. afrmation of elie before baptiom. And in Appendix A, om 9. 641-685, appear 9 compiltion of statements on the deity and eterna pre-exitence of Christ and 1s position inthe Godhead from one of our most representative writers, Ellen , Whit. As to Christ place in the Godhead, we believe Him tobe the second ‘person nthe heacoly Trinity —compried of athe, Son, and Holy Spirit—who are united nt only nthe Godhead Buti he provisions ofredenpuion. A series of sucinc statements onthe Tit also ‘appears in Appendix A, "Christ's Place in the Godhead,” clearly presenting (1) that Christi ome withthe Bernat Father one in nature, equal in power and authority, God inthe highest sense eternal and self existent ith Ife origina, unborrowed,underve and (2) that Crist existed rom all eer, distint fom, but united ‘ith the Father possessing the same glory. anda the dine tributes, Seventhday Advent base thelr Blof nthe Trilty om ‘he statements of Holy Serptre rather tha oma istorte ered Article 2 ofthe statement on Fundamental Belief, is explicit ‘hat the Godhead, or Trinity, cont ofthe Btrnal Father personal, spiritual Being, omnipotent, ommpretet, omniscient Infinite n wisdom and love; the Lord Sous Christ, the Som af he ternal Father, through whom ll hings were created and through whom the salvation af he redeemed hot willbe acomplished: the Holy Spr, the third person ofthe Godhead, the great regenerating ‘power inthe work of redempion, Matt. 28:19 ‘Questions om Doctrine, p.35-26 pneu atgarg nye etn napacacaarrnethasyanaes "vay Lay Foon Helped SOR Enact Tony at Below s 2 paper fem Andrews Unversity about the book Questions on Doctrine {and how LaRoy Freer chersplckad statements fem een White ‘ven te portion of Questions on Doctrine hick L. B. room inthe od incted marke te greatest contribution —dppendices A, B, ad (Chas come under scrutiny: Appendix B had be significantly ‘modified afer ts publication and the present outhor has under preparation a significant review of Appendix C: The Atonement ‘which will demonstrate that Exoom tendency to cherrpick the statements selected for tenders tan warelable guide 1 Elen Whe ae of the atonement Larry Kirkpatrick A Wind of Doctrine Blows Throupk the Charch: The Alternate Hamartiology of Questions of Doctrine (ht lgod andrews docs lary Srkparick pA .7 ‘questions an Dectrine was annentated in 2008 and this is what George Kein Ahvcs:f/enauipeis orafwikiGeorge A Krigh) had to say The authors at tmes push he facts i toa fron uch sats as Advent hstoric understanding f the Tle and they even ‘resent their data a way tha crates a fase impresion on the man mature of Crist. But given the dere to please ad the Iimortonce ofthe ancwers, the volume overall ea remarkably courageous statement of traditional Adventist doctrinal snderstanding. George Knight, Ouertions on Doctrine, Annotated Eaton, 208, p What is the purpose of this research material? ‘The purpose ofthis research isto bring awareness to the fac that there hasbeen focused effort.on the par of leaders inte Seventh-day Aventis church to, bring about change to eur doctrine of Ge Listed below are afew reasons from the quoted references Isted above, why 1 personaly question the Tiny doctrine thats now in he Seventh-day Adventist ures + Froom ook elect words af Fen White, that seem to show the Tiny doctrine, but when ead in context mean the opposite, He then placed ‘those quetes into 3 compiled book with subheadings te leas the reader to anew decrine + Froom represented a nen-SDAunderstanding ofthe Hely Spr. He studies men outside of aur astine faith to earn about he Holy Spit, and prometed these views. + The latimers enase who knew the foundation of eur church) ware upset when LeRey roam began teaching what he had leaned fam tangelclveachers abou the Holy + Froom compitely revised a bok fom an author whois dead while keeping the author's name on the revised ection. After reading both the ‘original and revises edition of "Daniel andthe Revelaven” by Unah ‘Smith, Las stared te See how diferent the book now reads IIs not the same baok in my opinion. It doesnot read the same. The revised beok has {ferent spirit to The revised book reads more “cniar wile the ‘original has “heart” Net only have te teachings about God and Chest been removed from the book, but the perscnality af Uriah Smith who was 2 gfted writer and 2 post, has been removed and replaced with a ieless rendition of facts, + Tate the book “Question on Destrne" was designed fer the purpose ‘of preving that our church was inline wth the main pons of Cnstn torthodony.don'balleve this lea Bilal way to write a book nora erect way te establish teuthin our eure pneu atgarg nye etn napacacaarrnethasy ne{vaya Foon Hale SORs Enact Tony at The word that came to Jeremiah from the LORD, saying. Stand in the gate ofthe LORD'S house, and proclaim there this word and say, ear the word ofthe LORD. all of Juda, that enter ina there _gtes to worship the LORD. Ths saith the LORD of hosts, the God oflsracl, Amend your ways and your dings, and I il cause you to vel nthe place Tras ye not ning word. saving, The temple of ‘the LORD, The temple ofthe LORD, The tpl ofthe LORD, are these. For iy doughy amend your ways and your doings: i've ‘roughly execute judgment eoween a man and hs neighbour: Ife oppress not the tanger the faheres, andthe widow, and shed not Innocent blood in this plae, neither walk after other gods to your dur: Then will Feause yout deli his place nthe Tan that _gave 0 your fathers. forever and ever Behold. y rast ing words that cannot profi Jeremiah 71-8 e LeRoy Froom (htpilfawaretsotight.org/categoryipeopelery room) Movement of Destiny are ay te tka AUaleAinaenighe aks fexegeryaset lenny!) LeRoy Fcoom (ntpisfawaijerstighe orgtag/lereytroom) ‘Tot (hte jetsolight orgitaginy) < atriarchs Ba Bry irety LEAVE A REPLY pneu atgarg nye etn napacacaarrnethasy soi