Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Abstract-This paper is a tutorial on the protection of Mutual coupling also causes errors in single-ended zero
mutually coupled transmission lines. It discusses how mutual sequence fault locating algorithms. Negative-sequence multi
coupling affects the polarizing quantities of ground directional
ended fault locating algorithms and traveling wave algorithms
elements, the reach of ground distance elements, and the
are not affected by mutual coupling.
accuracy of single-ended fault locating algorithms. The paper
provides settings guidelines for instantaneous directional Sometimes there is no more room in a substation to add a
overcurrent and ground distance elements. It discusses in detail bay, and the utility company needs to free one of the bays to
how transmission line mutual coupling causes overreaching or bring an additional line into the substation. A solution to this
underreaching of ground distance elements. It also discusses the problem is to operate a double-circuit transmission line as a
impact on these elements of grounding the mutually coupled line
single circuit with jumpers placed across similar phases along
at both line ends during maintenance. The paper analyzes
the line. In these cases, the protection engineer needs to decide
whether mutual coupling compensation offers any benefits to line
protection. The ease and benefit of line current differential where to install jumpers to parallel the two circuits in order to
schemes are contrasted in the discussion. Lastly, the paper avoid distance element underreaching.
examines a case when a double-circuit transmission line is This paper is a tutorial on the protection of mutually
operated as a single circuit with jumpers placed across similar coupled transmission lines. It discusses the problems outlined
phases along the line. This situation typically arises when the
previously and provides guidelines for solving them.
utility company needs to free one of the bays to bring an
additional line into the substation. The protection engineer needs
to decide where to install jumpers to parallel the two circuits in II. TRANSMISSION LINE PROTECTION PRINCIPLES
order to avoid distance element underreaching. The paper Transmission line protection can use any of the following
provides an analysis of this problem and offers suggestions on
principles [ 1 ]:
how to address it.
• Directional overcurrent protection
I. INTRODUCTION • Distance protection
• Directional comparison protection
Electric utilities frequently use multiple lines to transport
• Current differential protection
large amounts of power through narrow right-of-way line
Directional overcurrent protection uses directional
corridors. In many cases, two or more lines share the same
elements to supervise the operation of overcurrent elements.
right of way, or two or more circuits use the same
The high-speed protection zone reach varies with changes in
transmission towers. C onstructing a multiple-circuit line is
the source impedance. Phase directional overcurrent
less expensive than building separate transmission lines.
protection (67) must be set above load current, which limits
Magnetic mutual induction occurs in multiple-circuit lines and
protection sensitivity and speed. Adding a negative-sequence
also in single-circuit lines that run in close proximity to each
overcurrent element improves sensitivity and speed for phase
other using the same right of way. Mutually coupled lines may
to-phase faults. Ground directional overcurrent protection
have the same or different voltage levels. These lines bring
(67N), which responds to the zero-sequence current, is more
about particular protection challenges.
sensitive than ground distance protection.
Modeling mutually coupled lines for short-circuit analysis
Distance protection uses voltage and current to determine
requires considering multiple factors, including line geometry
the zone of the fault. A distance protection scheme generally
and the multiple couplings that can take place in the right-of
includes three phase distance elements (2 1 ) and three ground
way corridors. Lines can be coupled for only part of their
distance elements (2 1 N), with three or more protection zones
length, which makes it necessary to create additional nodes at
each. S ource impedance changes have almost no effect on the
the points where mutual coupling starts and ends.
high-speed zone reach of distance protection.
Magnetic mutual coupling affects mainly the zero
Directional overcurrent and distance schemes provide
sequence networks. Ground directional overcurrent elements
primary line protection and also provide backup protection to
and ground distance elements, which respond to zero
adjacent lines and buses. These schemes do not require
sequence quantities, can be affected by mutual coupling. The
communications channels, but their high-speed protection
user must either set these elements considering mutual
zones do not cover 1 00 p ercent of the protected line. Thus, the
coupling or apply compensation methods. Using negative
clearing of line-end faults may be time-delayed, which could
sequence directional elements and line current differential
jeopardize power system stability, affect power quality, cause
schemes solves these problems.
equipment damage, and be more of a safety risk. Directional
'. j
subtransmission and distribution lines.
Vb -Vb' Zba Zbb Zbc Zbd Ib
Pilot protection, or teleprotection, uses a communications (1)
Ve -Vc' Zca Zeb Zee Zed Ie
channel to compare information from the line terminals and
provide high-speed fault clearing for 1 0 0 percent of the Vd -Vd' Zda Zdb Zde Zdd Id
protected line. Pilot protection includes directional
Equation (I) can be reduced to (2) using Kron's reduction
comparison and current-based schemes (phase comparison and
method. Using the left side of the line as our reference, we can
line current differential schemes).
In directional comparison protection, instantaneous solve for voltages V., Vb , and Vc because I d - ( I a + Ib + Ic )
=
directional overcurrent or distance elements exchange fault and Va - Vd" Vb ' - Vd, , and Vc' - Vd, equal zero.
direction information over the communications channel.
Directional comparison protection can work with any high
speed, dedicated channel. Channel impairments may affect (2)
scheme dependability or security, depending upon the scheme
logic (tripping or blocking logic).
The expressions for the self and mutual impedances of
Line current differential protection compares current
transmission line conductors can be extended to a system of
information from the line terminals over the communications
several conductors. Typical dual-circuit tower configurations
channel. Phase comparison protection only compares current
have a set of phase conductors and ground wires that can be
phase angle information, which reduces the channel
described using Carson's equations for the self and mutual
bandwidth requirements. However, line current differential
impedances. The matrix system can become fairly large if
protection, having sequence differential elements, is more
bundled phase conductors are used. Mathematical techniques
sensitive than phase comparison protection [2]. Line current
can be used to simplify the system to an expression of the type
differential protection is secure and more dependable than
of (3), which can be extended to any number of conductors
other types of protection in response to the effects of
[6].
unbalances, power swings, mutual coupling, and voltage
Equation (3 ) describes the voltage drop in the conductor
inversion. Line current differential protection performs well
system of two mutually coupled three-phase lines.
for evolving, intercircuit, and cross-country faults.
d'
31
in Fig. 2. The phase currents can be decomposed into transpositions in the line, the zero-sequence mutual term ZOM
symmetrical components expressed as the sum of positive cannot be eliminated; but, if we properly transpose the
(I I ), negative- (Iz), and zero-sequence (10)
components. The transmission line at symmetrical distances, the sequence
positive- and negative-sequence currents add to zero. The impedance matrix takes the form of (9).
positive- and negative-sequence flux linkages to the adj acent
line depend on the relative position of the phase conductors
Zoo 0 0 ZO M 0 0
0 ZI I 0 0 0 0
but are very low. As a result, the positive- and negative
sequence mutual impedances are zero for practical purposes. 0 0 Z22 0 0 0
On the other hand, zero-sequence currents do not add to [ZSEQJ= Z M Z�o (9)
zero. The zero-sequence flux linking the adj acent line is
O 0 0 0 0
[iJ[A{L
components. ( 1 0)
For short-circuit analysis, the posltlve- and negative
(4) sequence networks do not include any mutual effects, as
shown in Fig. 4 for an A-phase-to-ground fault in a two
source system. In the zero-sequence network, however, the
[AI=[: ,:, 1
where: mutual impedance must be accounted for with a voltage
source.
2
a (5)
Yielding: rnZOL
ZOSL �}�ZO M.I�
10M mZOM
-
ZOSR
32
IV. GROUND DIRECTIONAL OVERCURRENT
PROTECTION CONSIDERATIONS ( 1 2)
33
quantity, as discussed in the previous section. Traditional when the mutually coupled lines are in two electrically
ground directional overcurrent elements use zero -sequence isolated networks. In this case, mutual coupling is the only
voltage and/or current as the polarizing quantity. Zero link between the zero-sequence networks, and polarizing
sequence voltage or current is an appropriate and simple quantity reversals are most likely.
polarizing quantity as long as the user selects an adequate The protection engineer should perform appropriate short
zero-sequence polarizing source. However, zero-sequence circuit studies to determine whether the zero-sequence
voltage and/or current polarizing quantities are not always polarizing quantities of directional elements are of sufficient
reliable. magnitude and of proper phase relationship with the operating
The zero-sequence voltage is a voltage drop produced by quantities. In addition, the protection engineer should identifY
zero-sequence current flowing through the zero -sequence the possibility of a zero-sequence network isolation situation
network. The zero-sequence voltage is highest at the fault during normal operating conditions, during manual switching
location and typically decreases as it gets closer to sources of operations, or because of sequential fault clearing.
ground current. Strong zero-sequence current buses, having Fig. 5 shows a 230 kY network where remote generation is
low zero-sequence shunt impedances to the neutral bus, have connected radially to Bus S through three transmission lines
very small zero-sequence voltage during ground faults, which with mutual coupling. When a single-phase-to-ground (SLG)
could affect the polarizing quantity of ground directional fault occurs near Bus S in front of Breaker 3, the remote delta
overcurrent elements. grounded wye transformers contribute zero -sequence fault
In addition, zero-sequence mutual coupling induces a current towards Bus S. The voltages and currents shown in
voltage rise in the zero-sequence network that may cause a Fig. 5, expressed in kilovolts and amperes respectively, are the
zero-sequence voltage reversal [ 1 3 ]. The zero -sequence result of a short-circuit study.
voltage reversal forces zero-sequence current to flow down the The zero-sequence voltage polarizing quantity (3 Yo) at
neutral, instead of flowing up the neutral, in a wye-grounded Bus R (Line 1 ) lags the operating quantity (3 10) by 9 1 °, and
transformer at that location, reversing the zero -sequence the directional element at Bus R correctly declares a forward
polarizing current obtained [Tom the transformer neutral CT. directional decision. On the Bus S end of Line 1 , the zero
This voltage and current reversal can be detrimental to the sequence voltage polarizing quantity (3 Yo) leads the operating
security of high-speed directional comparison schemes and quantity (3 10) by 87°, and the directional element at Bus S
traditional ground directional overcurrent relays, which declares a reverse directional decision as expected for an
depend on zero-sequence voltage or current polarization to external fault behind it. This result indicates that the mutual
make directional decisions during ground faults. coupling is not strong enough to overcome the electrical
Zero-sequence polarizing quantity reversals occur typically connection between the lines at Bus S. However, zero
when the mutual coupling between lines is strong enough to sequence polarizing quantity reversals could occur in this
dominate over their electrical connection. An extreme case is network for different source impedance values, for example .
T
3Vo 1 3 1 4/-83°
1 42.2/- 1 78° Line 2 _
Line 3
3Vo
25.8/- 1 76°
Fig. 5. SLG fault on the line side of Breaker 3. The ground directional elements perform well for this fault.
34
Assume that Breaker 3 at Bus S opens instantaneously to The following subsections describe a number of typical
clear the fault and that Breaker 4 at Bus T has time-delayed network configurations that can cause protection challenges
operation. The zero-sequence networks are isolated in this for ground directional overcurrent elements and solutions to
switching arrangement, as illustrated in Fig. 6 . mitigate incorrect tripping of transmission lines during
Observe from the fault study data i n Fig. 6 that the zero external faults in mutually coupled lines.
sequence voltage polarizing quantity (3Vo) at Bus S lags the
J) Mutually Coupled Lines Bused at Both Ends
operating quantity (310) by 94° and the Line 1 directional
Fig. 8 shows two mutually coupled lines bused together at
element at Bus S will declare a forward directional decision.
both ends. SLG faults in this network arrangement produce
The zero-sequence voltage polarizing quantity (3Vo) at Bus R
the proper phase relationship between zero -sequence
(Line 1 ) lags the operating quantity (310) by 9 1 ° and the
polarizing and operating quantities, because the electrical
directional element at Bus R will also declare a forward
connection of the two paralleled lines is so strong that the
directional decision. Because both directional elements at
mutual coupling cannot cause zero -sequence polarizing
Breaker I and Breaker 2 on Line I declare a forward
quantity reversals. Therefore, ground directional overcurrent
directional decision, Line I could be tripped for the external
elements will make correct directional decisions, assuming
fault on the mutually coupled Line 2 if the forward directional
that the zero-sequence polarizing voltages or currents are of
overcurrent elements in a directional comparison scheme are
adequate magnitude.
set below 373 amperes. The cause of this potential
misoperation is that the current in the zero -sequence isolated 2) Mutually Coupled Lines Bused at One End
loop (Line 1) causes a zero-sequence voltage reversal at Bus R Opening the tie Breaker 5 at Bus R, as shown in Fig. 9,
and the zero-sequence current flows down the neutral of the weakens the electrical connection in the system, and the
delta-grounded wye generator step-up transformer. mutual coupling between Line 1 and Line 2 starts playing a
Fig. 7 illustrates the voltage reversal at Bus R of the system more important role on the zero-sequence polarizing voltages
shown in Fig. 6 with Breaker 3 open (the isolated zero during SLG faults. In this network arrangement, a polarizing
sequence network case). Fig. 7 shows the equivalent zero quantity reversal could occur, depending on the level of
sequence network of the system in Fig. 6, the zero-sequence mutual coupling between lines and the strength of the zero
voltages at Bus S (Vos) and Bus R (VOR), and the zero sequence sources. Therefore, appropriate short-circuit studies
sequence current on Line 1 (lO_SR). It is clear that the zero should be conducted to determine whether zero -sequence
sequence voltages at Bus S and Bus R are approximately 1 80 ° voltage or current polarization is adequate or whether other
from each other (a voltage reversal at B u s R). types of directional elements using different polarizing
techniques should be applied.
T
3Vo
2 1 340/-8T
4.5/- 1 740 Open Line
-
3Vo
1 4.4/90
Fig. 6. SLG fault on the line side of Breaker 3. Breaker 3 is open, creating an isolation of zero-sequence networks.
low
lOT lOR
Vas
VOR
los
+ +
---. ---.
S lo_sR lo_sR R
Vas = -lo_sR los VOR = lo_sR lOR
Fig. 7. Zero-sequence network of the Fig. 6 system showing the voltage reversal.
35
In addition, line-end faults cleared by sequential breaker Zone 1 ground distance element or the instantaneous ground
tripping in the Fig. 9 system (with Breaker 5 open) cause zero directional overcurrent element trips Breaker 3
sequence network isolation and may result in ground instantaneously. This network arrangement creates a zero
directional element misoperation in the healthy line. For sequence polarizing quantity reversal at Bus R on Line 1 , as
example, Fig. 10 shows an SLG fault near Bus S for which the shown in Fig. 1 0 .
S R
Line 2
-
,
4
rB
'rL��
! laM I
L:::"n
:.
Line 1
-
1----f-..l.-----1 4 1--t----< rB
,
i laM I
-
Line 1
Fig. 9. Mutually coupled lines bused together with bus tie breaker open at Bus R.
S R
Line 2
-
1---I/3I'I--1f--
--�---__1 4 1---+---< rB
,
. �L::::.
SLG I laM I
Fault
-3Vo
Fig. 10. Breaker 3 tripping with tie Breaker 5 open causes zero-sequence network isolation and results in a zero-sequence polarizing quantity reversal.
36
Fig. 1 1 shows another network arrangement where 3) Mutually Coupled Lines in Looped Systems
mutually coupled lines are bused at one end, Bus S, and Looped network configurations are also susceptible to
terminate at two different substations, Bus R and Bus T. The zero-sequence quantity reversals. Fig. 1 2 shows an example of
lines are mutually coupled for only a portion of the line length such a network configuration. This network provides a weaker
(i.e., from S to M on Line 2 and S to N on Line 1 ) . This electrical connection between Bus S and Bus R than the
configuration, which is more common than the one shown in parallel line configuration of Fig. 8. Hence, polarizing
Fig. 1 0, may also lead to zero-sequence polarizing quantity quantity reversals are possible even with all breakers closed.
reversal, depending on system parameters. Furthermore, In addition, sequential clearing of line -end faults (e.g., the
sequential fault clearing can cause isolation of zero -sequence fault shown in Fig. 1 2 causing Breaker 3 to open first)
networks, as shown in Fig. II, for a line-end fault in front of increases the likelihood of zero-sequence polarizing quantity
Breaker 3, which causes this breaker to trip before Breaker 4. reversals. Finally, operating the Fig. 1 2 system with one line
When the lines are mutually coupled for only part of their open creates a configuration similar to those in Fig. 10 and
length, as in Fig. 1 1 , the correct way to model the zero Fig. 1 1 , which further increases the likelihood of polarizing
sequence mutual coupling in a short-circuit program is to quantity reversals.
create two additional buses (Points M and N in Fig. 1 1 ),
4) Mutually Coupled Lines Operating at Different Voltages
instead of distributing the mutual coupling from Bus R to
Two or more transmission lines at different voltage levels
Bus S and from Bus S to Bus T. Distributing the mutual
may share the same right of way or may even share the same
coupling incorrectly can produce erroneous short-circuit
towers. This results in a strong zero -sequence mutual coupling
currents. Making relay settings based on short-circuit study
between the two voltage systems. Typically, these two voltage
results that did not properly take into consideration the fact
systems are electrically connected to each other via power
that the lines were only mutually coupled for a portion of their
transformers. However, this connection is weak when
total length can cause misoperations of instantaneous ground
compared with the magnetic coupling between the lines.
directional overcurrent elements.
R
M
S
Open Line 2
- �
SLG
Faull
T
Fig. 1 1 . Mutually coupled lines bused at one end and tenninating at different substations.
S R
Open Open
�. Line 3
-'
/ /
Line 1 Line 2
.- " - " -.
( laM
-. .-
37
Therefore, the magnetic coupling is dominant. As a result 1) Applying Negative-Sequence Directional Elements
of this mutual coupling, any ground fault on one power system Negative-sequence voltage-polarized directional elements
will influence the zero-sequence current flow in the other have the following advantages when compared with zero
circuit. Typically, the higher voltage system will have higher sequence voltage-polarized directional elements:
fault currents, and as a result, ground faults on the high • Negative-sequence directional elements are insensitive
voltage system will have a pronounced effect on the lower to zero-sequence mutual coupling. They are suitable
voltage system. for systems with isolated zero-sequence networks.
In some countries, high-voltage and distribution voltage • If the bus behind the relay location is a strong zero
lines often share the same towers, and there is a strong zero sequence source, the negative-sequence voltage
sequence mutual coupling between the two lines. When the available at the relay location is typically higher than
high-voltage power system experiences a ground fault, the the zero-sequence voltage.
strong zero-sequence mutual coupling does not result in large There are, however, system network configurations where
current flow in the distribution system if the distribution both the negative- and zero-sequence sources are very strong,
system is either high-impedance grounded, resonant (Petersen which makes the negative-sequence directional elements
coil) grounded, or even ungrounded. performing phase comparison ineffective. The scalar quantity
If both systems are effectively grounded, then zero calculated by these elements is very small when the polarizing
sequence polarized protection elements should be avoided. voltage is low (Section IV, Subsection A). Negative-sequence
The integrity of the zero-sequence elements cannot be directional elements that measure impedance (Section IV,
guaranteed because a ground fault on one power system will Subsection A) are more secure and reliable than negative
induce zero-sequence currents, and as a result, zero-sequence sequence directional elements performing phase comparison
voltage into the other system. This may result in relays on the [1 7]. Faults at the end of long lines provide very low negative
healthy power system operating for a fault on the faulted sequence voltage for systems with strong negative -sequence
power system. As was shown in Fig. 7, a voltage reversal is sources, and for that reason, the directional elements
not uncommon for systems that are electrically isolated [Tom measuring impedance are preferred.
one another. Proper modeling of zero -sequence mutual While a negative-sequence directional element measuring
coupling in short-circuit programs is essential to analyze these impedance should be the preferred choice for most
configurations. transmission line ground fault protection applications, one
directional element may not be sufficient for all operating
C. Solutions
conditions, as discussed in Section IV, Subsection A. An
Incorrect directional element performance caused by zero adaptive ground directional element [ 1 2] automatically selects
sequence polarizing quantity reversals can be avoided using between three directional elements based on different
the following methods [ 1 3 ] [14] [ 1 5 ] [16] [ 1 7] [1 8]: polarizing methods for each ground fault.
• Applying negative-sequence directional elements. There are cases where the negative-sequence quantities are
• Using negative-sequence overcurrent elements to not available. For example, some utilities install station bypass
supervise ground directional comparison schemes. switches to accommodate breaker maintenance, as shown in
• Applying ground distance elements. Fig. 1 3 . For this analysis, we assume that negative-sequence
• Applying current differential schemes. directional elements are applied to the looped system of
Fig. 1 3 . We also assume that there is no generation source at
the low-side bus of the transformers connected at Bus T.
s R
/ '. Line 3
_I
.'-
Line 1 Line 2
.- " - " -.
( laM
. __ .. -
Fig. 1 3 . Breaker maintenance at Bus T creates additional ground fault protection challenges.
38
Closing the station bypass Switch C to accommodate negative-sequence overcurrent element. For example, Fig. 1 4
maintenance of Breaker 3 at Bus T creates a three-terminal shows that there is no negative-sequence current o n Line 1 for
line, which presents additional protection challenges that will the specific switching conditions of Fig. 6. Therefore, a
not be addressed here as they are beyond the scope of this sensitive negative-sequence overcurrent element can be used
paper. Note, however, that using any type of negative to supervise the voltage-polarized zero-sequence directional
sequence directional element at Bus T cannot provide elements of Breaker 1 and Breaker 2 and prevent a
adequate ground fault protection because there is no positive misoperation of Line I relays during an external ground fault.
or negative-sequence source behind Breaker 2. The protection
3) Applying Ground Distance Elements
engineer should then select the most appropriate polarizing
When zero-sequence and negative-sequence quantities are
quantity for the Fig. 1 3 switching arrangement. A possible
not reliable for polarizing ground directional elements, ground
solution is to apply zero-sequence voltage or current for
distance elements may be considered for ground fault
polarization and use a different settings group for the
protection [1 5]. Before applying ground distance elements for
Breaker 2 relay. If zero-sequence current polarization is not
these cases, a thorough understanding of distance elements is
available, or zero-sequence voltage polarization is not
required. For instance, quadrilateral ground distance elements
adequate based on the results of a short-circuit study, then
may be polarized either by zero- or negative-sequence current,
other protection principles may be more appropriate (e.g., line
and if that is the case, these elements may not be useful. For
current differential protection or ground distance protection).
such a case, a self-polarized quadrilateral ground distance
In any case, the protection engineer must always evaluate all
element may become an option. In most cases, a system has at
available polarizing quantities and select the most appropriate
least either a strong zero-sequence source (suggesting zero
one for the particular application.
sequence current polarization) or a strong negative-sequence
Digital relays offer flexibility in the selection of directional
source (suggesting negative-sequence current polarization).
elements and in using the directional elements to supervise the
Ground distance elements have limited sensitivity to detect
ground overcurrent elements. Forward or reverse directional
high-resistance faults. The voltage measured by the relay is
elements can be used for supervision. Application of reverse
the sum of the line voltage drop to the fault and the voltage
directional elements requires careful analysis because they can
drop across the fault resistance. The voltage drop across the
impact relay coordination in ways that are not readily
fault resistance depends on the current infeed from the other
apparent. Reference [1 8] provides excellent examples from a
line terminal(s). On looped transmission systems with tapped
large utility company of misoperations of zero -sequence
substations, there are several sources of ground current
voltage-polarized directional elements. It also provides
feeding the fault, which causes an amplification of the fault
recommendations for directional supervision of digital ground
resistance. As the total fault current increases with respect to
overcurrent elements.
the relay current, the apparent fault resistance also increases
2) Applying Negative-Sequence Overcurrent Supervision [1 ].
The zero-sequence network isolation conditions shown in Application of ground distance elements is discussed in
Fig. 6 and Fig. 10 cause zero-sequence quantity reversals, more detail in Section V.
making zero-sequence voltage- or current-polarized ground
4) Applying Current Differential Schemes
directional elements unreliable. A solution to avoid
Application of modern digital current differential schemes
misoperation o f a pilot protection scheme on Line 1 is to apply
provides high-speed line protection and the best selectivity
negative-sequence directional elements measuring impedance
and solves most of the zero-sequence polarization problems
available in some modern digital relays.
discussed earlier in this paper. Application of line current
Another solution to this problem is to supervise the ground
differential protection is discussed in more detail in
directional overcurrent element with a nondirectional
Section VI.
v,
41.01-17r
T
V2
447/-sr
0100
Line 1
V2
0100
39
D. Ground Instantaneous Overcurrent Element Settings
The fundamental criterion for setting ground instantaneous
overcurrent elements is to provide instantaneous protection for
the maj ority of the line length without tripping on external
ground faults. The settings calculation goal is to determine the
maximum current in the relay under consideration by
assuming abnormal but realistic switching changes.
The first step is to apply SLG faults at the remote bus, Fault
3 , 5 00 amperes.
40
V. GROUND DISTANCE PROTECTION CONSIDERATIONS B. impact ofMutual Coupling on Ground Distance Elements
A. Ground Distance Elements Fig. 1 6 shows two parallel, mutually coupled lines. For a
bolted A-phase-to-ground fault on Line 1 , the input signals to
i) Ground Distance Element input Signals the A-phase ground distance element are the current I I a + ko=
Table I summarizes the input signals to traditional ground If and the voltage V Va given by ( 1 5).
=
AG V, I, +ko I,
BG Vb Ib+kO I,
CG V, 1, +ko I,
41
For example, based on the network configurations s R
42
We use the system shown in Fig. 1 8 as an example. This three scenarios. Another alternative is to use different settings
system includes two mutually coupled lines connected in groups.
parallel. Considering the ground distance elements of In the fixed settings alternative, Zone 1 reach should be set
Breaker 1 (Line 1 ), Zone 1 must be set to not overreach Bus R smaller than the measured impedance for the third scenario .
under any system configurations and fault conditions; Zone 2 reach should be set greater than the measured
similarly, Zone 2 must not underreach Bus R and should cover impedance for the first scenario, with a safety multiplier of at
faults like F2 in Fig. 1 8 . Hence, overreaching caused by least 120 percent. Of course, the user must also evaluate other
mutual coupling must be considered when setting Zone 1, and possible fault locations.
underreaching must be considered when setting Zone 2 and There is a lower limit to the Zone 1 reach setting: Zone 1
other overreaching zones, which are typically used in must detect ground faults at least up to 60 percent of the line
directional comparison schemes (e.g., permissive overreaching length. Theoretically, 50 percent line coverage would be
transfer trip [POTT]). enough, but then there would be no safety margin. With 60
To illustrate the effect of the system configuration, Table II percent line coverage, ground faults on 20 percent of the line
shows the different switching states of the coupled line and (middle part between 40 and 60 percent) can be cleared from
the measured impedances in each case for a fault at the end of both line terminals simultaneously. Ground faults on the
the parallel line at Bus R (Fig. 8 and Fig. 1 8) [24]. The remaining 80 percent of the line (0 to 40 and 60 to 1 00
measured impedances were derived from ( 1 6) with the percent) will normally be cleared instantaneously by the pilot
following assumptions : scheme or sequentially by the distance scheme.
• The phase current and the residual current of the Another alternative to deal with the scenarios in Table II is
protected line are equal (Ia If), = to assign and adapt individual settings groups to different
• The coupled line residual current is equal to the operating conditions (parallel line in service, out of service, or
residual current of the protected line (If 3 10M). = out of service and grounded) by considering the effective
mutual coupling of the different operating conditions [24].
TABLE II
MEASURED IMPEDANCES FOR DIFFERENT SWITCHING STATES OF THE The state of the coupled line can change dynamically from in
COUPLED LINE service to switched off and not grounded because of a breaker
opening at one or both line ends. Ground element reach
State of Coupled Li ne Measured Impedance
settings of the protected line may be too slow to adapt in real
In service ZAPP = ZIL +� time, and for this reason, the user needs to find a common
3(I + ko) settings group that would serve both scenarios (e.g., the
Out of service and grounded at one coupled parallel line in service or out of service and
point only or not grounded ungrounded). The third scenario, where the coupled line is out
of service and grounded at both ends, can be addressed with a
Out of service and grounded at
both line ends different settings group that is manually activated during line
maintenance conditions. Some electric utilities apply single
The first scenario in Table II is an underreaching condition, point grounding methods during line maintenance activities.
the second scenario represents a correct impedance In such cases, the user may introduce an additional settings
measurement, and the third scenario is an overreaching group corresponding to the second scenario in Table II.
condition. One alternative to deal with these scenarios is for
the user to select reach settings values that accommodate all
s R
Line 2
3 1-------1 4
-
10M
F,
Fig. 1 8 . Example power system that illustrates Zone 1 and Zone 2 reach settings.
43
As mentioned previously, the user must consider other fault 3) Applying ko Settings That Consider Mutual Coupling
locations and system conditions. For example, a fault on the Effect
coupled line may cause coordination problems in pilot For a line-end, bolted A-phase-to-ground fault in the
schemes because the direction and magnitude of the residual Fig. 1 6 system, m 1 in ( 1 5). Assuming that the coupled line
=
current in the healthy line will change during the course of residual current is equal to the residual current of the protected
sequential fault clearing. The ground distance element at line (IT 310M), ( 1 5) takes the form:
=
Bus R. This overreaching effect should also be considered for The term in parentheses preceding IT in ( 1 8) is the modified
the reverse-looking zones of the ground distance elements at ko value (ko') required to eliminate the impedance
Breaker 1 in Fig. 8 when a POTT or directional comparison measurement error when both lines are in service (the first
blocking (DeB) scheme is applied. These reverse-looking scenario in Table II) :
zones must reach further that the pilot forward overreaching
ZOM ZOL - ZIL + ZOM
k o' -
- k0 + ( 1 9)
_
zone of the ground distance elements at Breaker 2 for all - -""----'-"----"=
3Z1L 3Z1L
ground faults in Line 2 in order to avoid tripping the healthy
Line 1 . For a line-end, bolted A-phase-to-ground fault in the
Fig. 1 7 system, the coupled line residual current is:
2) Using the Zero-Sequence Current From the Coupled
Line ZOM I T
IOM - (20)
_ _
Va = mZ1 L ( la + ko IT + �o: J
1 0M ( 1 7)
Va = z Jl )l
Ia ko - �
3ZILZOL
JJ IT (2 1 )
3Z1L
44
In the fixed settings alternative, the user can apply the ko" radius. The inner radius is the reciprocal of 87LR. The
value to Zone 1 to avoid overreaching and the ko' value to differential element operates when the current ratio I R / I L
Zone 2 to avoid underreaching. The user must also evaluate (where IR is the remote-end current and IL is the local-end
other possible fault locations.
current) leaves the restraining region and the differential
current magnitude IlL + IR I is above a minimum pickUp value
In the settings group alternative, the user can apply the ko
value to Zone 1 and the ko' value to Zone 2 when the coupled
line is in service. Then, when the coupled line is out of service (a relay setting).
and grounded at both ends, the user can apply the ko" value to
Zone 1 and the ko' value to Zone 2. Alternatively, the user can
apply the ko value to Zone 1 and Zone 2 if the coupled line is
out of service and grounded at only one point.
.... ....
....
E. Errors in Single-Ended Fault Locating Algorithms S7LANG '"
/
2 /
Modern line protection relays include fault location /
functions. The absence of 10M from the coupled line in single /
I
ended fault locating algorithms that use zero -sequence I
information causes fault location errors. Mutual coupling I
I
compensation using the zero-sequence current from the
•
coupled line (Section V, Subsection D) eliminates these
•
errors. However, this type of compensation is not typically \
used, so the zero-sequence current from the coupled line is not \ Operati ng Region
\
available for the fault locating algorithms. \
Fault locating algorithms do not have the high-speed ,
,
processing requirement of distance protection functions. These S7LANG "
algorithms typically process the fault signals recorded after the --
2- ' ..... .....
45
ferroresonance in voltage transformers (VTs), The protection engineer must decide whether the double
transients in coupling capacitor voltage transformers circuit line can be operated in a single-circuit configuration
(CCVTs), and voltage inversion. However, if the with jumpers between the lines only in front of the breakers or
differential element sensitivity for long lines or cables whether additional jumpers between the two lines are
must be improved, calculating the charging current necessary to avoid Zone 1 or Zone 2 underreaching. In this
using the line voltage is advantageous. section of the paper, this problem is analyzed and suggestions
• Are almost immune to unbalances, current reversals are offered for solving it. The lines in Fig. 20a are 50-mile 230
on parallel lines, power swings, and zero-sequence kV lines with the following impedances:
mutual coupling. ZIL = 6.90 + j 3 8 .45 ohms
• Perform well for evolving, intercircuit, and cross ZOL = 2 1 .20 + j 1 2 1 .75 ohms
country faults. ZOM 1 4 . 3 0 + j 74 . 8 5 ohms
=
• Tolerate high line loading. First, apply three-phase faults along Line 2, assuming the
• May handle outfeed conditions, depending on the sources behind Bus S and Bus R to be of equal strength.
operating characteristic. Table IV shows the impedances measured from Bus S and
These advantages make line current differential protection Bus R for faults along Line 2 (0 percent represents a fault in
the best solution for mutually coupled transmission line front of Breaker 2, and 1 0 0 percent represents a fault in front
applications. of Breaker 1 ) .
46
Fig. 2 1 shows an even more challenging fault in computing Now assume that three j umpers, in addition to the two
the Zone 1 underreach. Here it is assumed that two of the jumpers at the line ends, are placed at intervals of 25 percent
conductors broke at a transmission line tower and caused a of the line length, as shown in Fig. 2 3 . Equation (27) gives the
phase-to-phase fault. This event may seem unlikely; however, impedance measured from Bus S for the fault shown in
these complex faults occasionally occur (e.g., during severe Fig. 23 . Equation (28) gives the impedance measured from
storms, earthquakes, or airplanes flying through transmission Bus S for this fault, with no infeed from Bus R. The measured
lines in agricultural areas during crop spraying). More often, impedance is 1 7 5 percent of Z ld2.
one conductor would fall from a transmission tower to ground
because of a faulty splice connector. In such cases, ground ZAPP = ZIL 28 + 8
( ��) Is
(27)
distance elements may underreach.
ZIL
Z APP = 1 . 75
Phase-to- (28)
Phase 2
Fault Line 2
Phase-to-
Line 2 Phase Fault
Jumper
Line 1
Line 1
ZAPP = ZIL 2 +
( �: ) (23)
(n+4)
- ZIL (30)
2 (n + l)
_
ZAPP
- 4 ZIL (24)
Z APP -
2 To find the minimum number of j umpers required to clear
Now assume that an additional jumper is placed at an internal phase-to-phase fault sequentially ( lR 0) with a =
50 percent of the line, as shown in Fig. 22. Equation (2 5) Zone 2 setting of 1 3 0 percent of Ztd2, use (3 0), substitute
gives the impedance measured from Bus S for the fault shown ZAPP with 1 . 3Z1LI2, and solve for n. This gives us n 9. For a =
in Fig. 22. Equation (26) gives the impedance measured from Zone 2 setting of 1 50 percent of Zld2, n 5 . =
Bus S for this fault, with no infeed from Bus R. The measured Table V gives the impedances measured at Bus S for
impedance is 250 percent of Zld2. phase-to-phase faults along Line 2 (Fig. 23), with n 9. =
TABLE V
(25) IMPEDANCES MEASURED FROM Bus S AND Bus R FOR PHASE-TO-PHASE
FAULTS ALONG LINE 2
= 2. 5 -
ZIL Impedance
(26)
2
ZAPP Distance Impedance Impedance
Measured
From Bus R Measured Measured
From Bus S
(Percent of From Bus R From Bus S
Phase-to With IR = 0
Phase Line Length) (Ohms) (Ohms)
(Ohms)
Jumper
10 4.72 45.60 25.40
20 7.06 36.98 23.52
30 9.46 3 1 .26 2 1 .57
40 1 1 . 94 26. 88 19.61
50 14.54 23.24 1 7.66
60 17.28 20.04 15.70
Fig. 22. One additional jumper placed at 50 percent of the line.
47
Assume that Zone 1 is set at 90 percent of Z I LI2 - A solution to this problem is to use negative
( 1 7.60 ohms) and Zone 2 is set at 1 3 0 percent of Z I J2 sequence polarized directional elements.
(25.40 ohms). From the results shown in Table V, the • Magnetic mutual coupling affects ground distance
following can be concluded: elements and compromises distance and directional
• The Zone 1 distance element at Bus R will operate for comparison scheme security and dependability.
faults up to 60 percent of the line. Ground distance elements overreach (a concern for
• The Zone 1 and Zone 2 distance elements at Bus S Zone 1 ) when the zero-sequence currents in the
underreach and will not operate for faults in Sections 1 protected line and the coupled line flow in opposite
through 4. directions and underreach (a concern for Zone 2)
• The Zone 2 distance element at Bus S will operate when these currents flow in the same direction.
sequentially after the breaker at Bus R is tripped by its Solutions to this problem include applying reach or
Zone 1 distance element. ko settings that consider the mutual coupling effect
• Application of an overreaching pilot scheme (POTT or and providing the relay with information on the
DCB) is necessary to clear faults instantaneously if zero-sequence current of the coupled line.
sequential tripping is not acceptable. These mutual coupling compensation methods are
• Settings for overreaching distance elements should be complex to apply, require extensive short-circuit
carefully selected using (29) by taking into studies, and generally provide only partial
consideration the worst-case fault current contribution solutions. For this reason, it is not recommended to
from the remote end (IR f- 0). use ground distance elements in mutually coupled
A similar analysis can be performed for ground distance lines.
elements at Bus S and Bus R. Underreaching of Zone 2 • Current differential protection is an excellent solution
ground distance elements occurs for faults in a portion of the for mutually coupled lines.
jumpered parallel lines. Line-to-ground fault clearing depends • Mutual coupling also causes errors in single-ended
on sequential breaker opening, similar to the phase-to-phase zero-sequence fault locating algorithms. Multi-ended
fault scenario discussed previously. negative-sequence fault locating algorithms and
This analysis assumes equidistant spacing of jumpers traveling wave algorithms are not affected by mutual
between similar phases along the transmission lines. Better coupling.
results could be achieved by placing j umpers in • Operating a double-circuit transmission line as a
nonequidistant spacing along the lines (e.g., placing j umpers single circuit with j umpers placed across similar
closer together near the line ends and farther away near the phases along the line causes phase and ground
middle of the line). Placing seven jumpers at 7, 1 3 , 1 9 , 22, 1 9, distance element underreaching. Applying current
1 3 , and 7 percent along the lines might be one such choice. differential schemes solves this problem.
Other choices may provide even better results. The protection
engineer should study each application, taking into IX. REFERENCES
consideration the source strength, to make sure the lines are [ I ] H. J. Altuve Ferrer and E. O. Schweitzer, III (eds.), Modern SolutIOns
adequately protected. for Protection. Control. and MOnitoring of ElectriC Power Systems.
Schweitzer Engineering Laboratories, Inc., Pullman, WA, 20 I O.
VIII. CONCLUSION [2] J. B. Roberts, D. A. Tziouvaras, G. Benmouyal, and H. J. Altuve, "The
Effect of Multiprinciple Line Protection on Dependability and Security,"
This paper discusses the protection problems of mutually proceedings of the 55th Annual Georgia Tech Protective Relaying
coupled transmission lines and provides guidelines for solving Conference, Atlanta, GA, May 200 1 .
them. We can conclude the following: [3] A . Bergen, Power Systems AnalysIs. Prentice-Hall Series i n Electrical
• Magnetic mutual coupling affects ground directional and Computer Engineering, 1986.
overcurrent elements polarized with zero-sequence [4] J. R. Carson, "Wave Propagation in Overhead Wires With Ground
Return," Bell System Technical Journal, Vol. 5, New York, 1 926.
quantities, which compromises directional comparison
[5] W. A. Elmore, "Zero Sequence Mutual Effects on Ground Distance
scheme security. Relays and Fault Locators," proceedings of the 1 9th Annual Westem
Mutual coupling may cause zero-sequence Protective Relay Conference, Spokane, WA, October 1 992.
polarizing quantity reversals when this coupling is [6] P. M. Anderson, AnalysIs of Faulted Power Systems. IEEE Press Series
strong enough to dominate over the electrical on Power Engineering, July 1 995.
connection between lines. An extreme case is when [7] C. R. Mason, The A r t a n d SCience of Proteclive Relaying. John Wiley
and Sons, New York, 1 956.
the zero-sequence network of the protected line is
[8] J. L. Blackburn, Protective Relaying: Principles a n d ApplicatIOns, 2nd
electrically isolated from the zero-sequence Edition. Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York-Basel, 1998.
network of the faulted line. [9] A. R. van C. Warrington, Protective Relays: Their Theory and Practice,
Zero-sequence polarized directional elements can Vol. I . Chapman and Hall Ltd., London, England, 1 962.
misoperate for reverse faults under certain system [ 1 0] E. O. Schweitzer, III and J. B. Roberts, "Distance Relay Element
configurations and breaker switching conditions. Design," proceedings of the 1 9th Annual Western Protective Relay
Conference, Spokane, WA, October 1992.
48
[ I I] J. B. Roberts and A. Guzman, "Directional Element Design and X. BIOGRAPHIES
Evaluation," proceedings of the 2 1 st Annual Western Protective Relay
Demetrios A. Tziouvaras received his BSEE from the University of New
Conference, Spokane, WA, October 1 994.
Mexico and MSEE from Santa Clara University. He is an IEEE senior
[12] A. Guzman, J. B. Roberts, and D. Hou, "New Ground Directional member and a member of the Power System Relaying Committee (PSRC) and
Elements Operate Reliably for Changing System Conditions," CIGRE. He previously worked at Pacific Gas and Electric Company, where
proceedings of the 23rd Annual Western Protective Relay Conference, he held various protection engineering positions, including principal
Spokane, WA, October 1 996. protection engineer for 1 8 years. In 1 998, he joined Schweitzer Engineering
[13] E. H. Gove and E. A. Taylor, "A Practical Remedy for Zero Sequence Laboratories, Inc., where he currently holds the position of senior instructor at
Reversal," proceedings of the 1 6th Annual Western Protective Relay SEL University. He holds four patents and has authored and coauthored more
Conference, Spokane, WA, October 1989. than 50 technical papers. He served as the convener of CIGRE working group
[14] K. H. Engelhardt, "VO-Reversal on Mutually Coupled Lines - Relaying B5. 1 5 on "Modern Distance Protection Functions and Applications" and is a
member of several IEEE PSRC and ClGRE working groups.
Analysis, Experience, and Remedies," proceedings of the I st Annual
Western Protective Relay Conference, Spokane, WA, October 1974.
Hector J. Altuve received his BSEE degree in 1 969 from the Central
[ 1 5] E. R. Terlau, II, "Experiences and Settings With the Application of University of Las Villas in Santa Clara, Cuba, and his Ph.D. in 1981 from
Ground Distance Relaying," proceedings of the 1 7th Annual Western Kiev Polytechnic Institute in Kiev, Ukraine. From 1 969 until 1 993, Dr. Altuve
Protective Relay Conference, Spokane, WA, October 1990. served on the faculty of the Electrical Engineering School at the Central
[ 1 6] C. H. Griffin, "Principles of Ground Relaying for High Voltage and University of Las Villas. From 1 993 to 2000, he served as professor of the
Extra High Voltage Transmission Lines," IEEE TransactIOns on Power Graduate Doctoral Program in the Mechanical and Electrical Engineering
Apparatus and Systems, Vol. PAS- I 02, No. 2, pp. 420-432, School at the Autonomous University of Nuevo Leon in Monterrey, Mexico.
February 1983. In 1 999 through 2000, he was the Schweitzer Visiting Professor in the
[ 1 7] J. Mooney and J. Peer, "Application Guidelines for Ground Fault Department of Electrical Engineering at Washington State University.
Protection," proceedings of the 24th Annual Western Protective Relay Dr. Altuve joined Schweitzer Engineering Laboratories, Inc. (SELl in January
Conference, Spokane, WA, October 1 997. 200 I , where he is currently a distinguished engineer and dean of SEL
University. He has authored and coauthored more than 1 00 technical papers
[ 1 8] A. Feathers, "Polarizing Choices for Directional Ground Relays," and several books and holds four patents. His main research interests are in
proceedings of the 3 8th Annual Western Protective Relay Conference, power system protection, control, and monitoring. Dr. Altuve is an IEEE
Spokane, WA, October 20 1 1 . senior member.
[ 1 9] V . Cook, Analysis of Distance ProtectIOn. Research Studies Press Ltd. ,
Letchworth, Hertfordshire, 1985. Fernando Calero received his BSEE in 1986 from the University of Kansas,
[20] F. Calero, "Distance Elements: Linking Theory With Testing," his MSEE in 1987 from the University of Illinois (Urbana-Champaign), and
proceedings of the 35th Annual Western Protective Relay Conference, his MSEPE in 1 989 from the Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute. From 1 990 to
Spokane, WA, October 2008. 1 996, he worked in Coral Springs, Florida, for the ABB relay division in the
[2 1] F. Calero, A. Guzman, and G. Benmouyal, "Adaptive Phase and Ground support, training, testing, and design of protective relays. Between 1 997 and
Quadrilateral Distance Elements," proceedings of the 36th Annual 2000, he worked for Itec Engineering, Florida Power and Light, and Siemens.
In 2000, Mr. Calero joined Schweitzer Engineering Laboratories, Inc. and
Western Protective Relay Conference, Spokane, WA, October 2009. presently is a senior automation systems engineer.
[22] J. Hubertus, J. Mooney, and G. Alexander, "Application Considerations
for Distance Relays on Impedance-Grounded Systems," proceedings of
the 34th Annual Western Protective Relay Conference, Spokane, WA,
October 2007.
[23] F. Calero, "Mutual Impedance in Parallel Lines - Protective Relaying
and Fault Location Considerations," proceedings of the 34th Annual
Western Protective Relay Conference, Spokane, WA, October 2007.
[24] CIGRE Working Group B5. 15, "Modern Distance Protection Functions
and Applications," Technical Brochure, CIGRE Document Reference
Number 3 59, October 2008.
[25] G. E. Alexander and J. G. Andrichak, "Ground Distance Relaying:
Problems and Principles," proceedings of the 1 8th Annual Western
Protective Relay Conference, Spokane, WA, October 1990.
[26] D. A. Tziouvaras, J. B. Roberts, and G. Benmouyal, "New Multi-Ended
Fault Location Design for Two- or Three-Tenninal Lines," proceedings
of ClGRE Study Committee 34 Colloquium, Florence, Italy, October
1 999.
[27] S. Marx, B. K. Johnson, A. Guzman, V. Skendzic, and M. V. Mynam,
"Traveling Wave Fault Location in Protective Relays: Design, Testing,
and Results," proceedings of the 1 6th Annual Georgia Tech Fault and
Disturbance Analysis Conference, Atlanta, GA, May 2013.
[28] B. Kasztenny, G. Benmouyal, H. J. Altuve, and N. Fischer, "Tutorial on
Operating Characteristics of Microprocessor-Based Multiterminal Line
Current Differential Relays," proceedings of the 3 8th Annual Western
Protective Relay Conference, Spokane, WA, October 20 1 1 .
[29] H . Miller, J . Burger, N . Fischer, and B . Kasztenny, "Modem Line
Current Differential Protection Solutions," proceedings of the 36th
Annual Western Protective Relay Conference, Spokane, WA,
October 2009.
201402 1 0 TP6623
•
49