INTERNSHIP DAIRY

DAY-1- 18TH JUNE 2018

Visit to the Ranchi high court in to see the proceeding of the court in the case of

Girdhari Yadav vs, Radhay Shyam somani WPC/5905/2008

In this case the parties were aggrieved by the judgement dated 1.08. 2008 in Eviction Suit and
filled a writ petition but never made his presence in the court no effective step was taken by the
petitioners for hearing of this writ petition. And hence the writ petition is dismissed.

Bhikhi Sao vs. State of Jharkhand

In this case I.A. No. 8879 of 2013 for the suspension of application of sentence rejected due to
gravity of the offence under sec 324 and 302 of I.P.C

DAY-2 19TH JUNE

Drafted an anticipatory bail application to be filed in the high court in Ranchi under section 438
0f the criminal procedure code 1973.

Filed the anticipatory bail application in the Ranchi high court with dairy no 157 of 2018.

The anticipatory bail application is filled in favor of Mangal Singh, with hearing of the case to be
held later.

DAY-3- 20TH JUNE

Visit to the Ranchi high court in to see the proceeding of the court in the case of

Om Prakash Chawanika vs State Of Jharkhand Cr. M.P/1765/2017

The proceeding which were held on 20th June, on application under sec 482 of CR.P.C 1973, the
state contended that the investigation is on the initial stage so the high court must not use it’s
inherited power under sec 482 in the present matter.

RAJU SAO VS. STATE OF JHARKHAND Cr.M.P/118/2006

The application was disposed on 20th June. It is with respect to quashing of prodding by using
inherited powers of the high court, but the state contended that since the trail already happened in
the lower court so high court must not use it’s power under 482 of CRPC 1973

DAY-4- 21ST JUNE 2018

 Drafted an anticipatory bail application to be filed in the high court in Ranchi under section
438 0f the criminal procedure code 1973.

Filed the anticipatory bail application in the Ranchi high court with dairy no 159 of 2018.

The anticipatory bail application is filled in favor of Harish Singh, with hearing of the case
to be held later.

 Drafted a regular bail application to be filed in the high court in Ranchi under section 437
0f the criminal procedure code 1973.

Filed the regular bail application in the Ranchi high court with dairy no 238 of 2018.

The anticipatory bail application is filled in favor of Rekha Murmu, with hearing of the
case to be held later.

DAY-5- 22ND JUNE 2018

Visit to the Ranchi high court in to see the proceeding of the court in the case of

Shivgi Gound @ Shivjee Gond vs. State Of Jharkhand (Cr. Appeal (DB) No. 684 of 2013 With
I.A. No. 4367 of 2018)

The interlocutory application has been preferred by appellant no. 1 under Section 389 of the Code
of Criminal Procedure for suspension of sentence awarded to this applicant by Sahibgang dist court
for the offence of murder of Raj Balli Gound, after hearing all the matter the court held the offence
is grave in nature and hence the sentence should not be suspended. The application is hence
disposed.

Diwakar Mandal vs. State Of Jharkhand (Cr. Appeal (DB) No. 287 of 2014 With I.A. No. 4161
of 2018)
The proceeding that were held on 22nd 0f June the application was filled for suspension of sentence
given by khuti dist court, the applicant was accused of offence committed under section 302 of
i.p.c read with sec 34, the matter was heard from the both side and the application will be disposed
on the next hearing.

DAY-8- 25TH JUNE 2018

Did the research work on the ingredients of section 304B of the Indian Penal Code 1860, death
caused by negligence.

Also did the research work on the ingredients of sec 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Also prepared a bail application to be filled in the high court Ranchi.

DAY-9- 26TH JUNE 2018

Visit to the Ranchi high court in to see the proceeding of the court in the case of

SANJAY PURSOTTAM DATE VS. STATE OF HARKHAND Cr.M.P./173/2007

The proceeding which happened on 26th of June an interlocutory application was filed to stay the
proceeding of the lower court in the offence of gracious hurt committed under 326 of the Indian
Penal Code, the court heared both the parties and the matter will be disposed on the next hearing.

BASANT KUMAR SINHA VS STATE OF JHARKHAND Cr MP/633/2016

The court stayed the proceeding in this case in connection with Complaint Case No. 629 of 2010,
pending in the court of Sri N.K. Vishwakarma, the learned J.M., Ranchi, it is the case related to
sec 302 of the Indian Penal Code.

DAY-10- 27TH JUNE 2018

Visit to the Ranchi high court in to see the proceeding of the court in the case of

ABDUL SHAKUR ANSARI And ANR VS STATE OF JHARKHAND Cr MP 126/2008

The case is disposed of on 27th of June 2018 The interlocutory application has been preferred by
appellant no. 1 under Section 389 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for suspension of sentence
awarded to this applicant by chatra dist court, it is related to offence under 376 of i.p.c, the court
rejected the application.
SURESH PRASAD GUPTA VS, STATE OF JHARKHAND Cr. M.P./1498/2017

The case is disposed of on 27th of June 2018, It is with respect to quashing of prodding by using
inherited powers of the high court, but the state contended that since the trail already began in the
lower court so high court must not use it’s power under 482 of CRPC 1973, and an I.A must be
filed for stay the trail process.

DAY-11-28TH JUNE 2018

Visit to the Ranchi high court in to see the proceeding of the court in the case of

VIJAY PRATAP SINHA VS. STATE OF JHARKHAND Cr. Rev 1439 of 2017

In this case parties contended that that the state run health clinic in Dhanbad has taken x-ray
machine from the petitioner and not paid for it, there is no such report so registrar of civil court of
Dhanbad was asked to make a report on it by 4th of July 2018. Till next hearing.

PARSHURAM SAH VS STATE OF JHARKHAND Cr.MP 414 OF 2008

The proceeding that were held on 28TH 0f June the application was filled for suspension of sentence
given by Chandil dist court, the applicant was accused of offence committed under section 302 of
i.p.c read with sec 34, the matter was heard from the both side, state contended that the offences
are grave in nature and no suspension should be done, and the court held that the application will
be disposed on the next hearing

DAY-12-29TH OF JUNE 2018

Did the research work on the ingredients of section 302 of the Indian Penal Code 1860, MURDER

Also did the research work on the ingredients of sec 324 and sec 326 of the Indian Penal Code

Drafted an interlocutory application for suspension of execution of sentence of the lower court of
Ranchi.

DAY-15- 2ND OF JULY 2018

Visit to the Ranchi high court in to see the proceeding of the court in the case of
MADAN LAL SINGH VS STATE OF JHARKHAND Cr. M.P 971/2008

The appeal in the high court is related to stay the proceedings of the lower court, in this case chatra
chief judicial magistrate has passed the order against the appellate in the matter related to sec 326-
A, the appellate said that the proceedings are not done properly and hence the procedure should be
stopped, court heard both the parties and gave next date.

RAJEEV RANJAN VS STATE OF JHARKHAND W.P.(Cr.)/12/2013

This is the case related to offence of election which is provided from sec 171-A of Indian Penal
Code 1860, in this case the petitioners said that the procedure related produceing of evidences in
front of the court is not properly followed, and hence the court in previous proceeding directed the
S.P of Hazaribagh to provide the evidence but he never did so, so in the next hearing he is called
to be physically present in the court.

DAY-16- 3RD JULY 2018

Visit to the Ranchi high court in to see the proceeding of the court in the case of

R. VIDYA PRAKASH AND ORS VS. STATE OF JHARKHAND Cr MP/1153/2016

In this case an interim application is filled, to stop the commencement of the sentence of the lower
court, and a stay should be put on by the high court, the matter is related to house breaking at night
and a punishment of two years is given, the applicant said that the offence is not grave in nature
so sentence should be stopped.

PRAKASH KISKU VS. STATE OF JHARKHAND Cr.Rev./929/2013

This case is related to offence of murder under section 302 of Indian Penal Code 1860, in this case
it was contended by the appellate that there are few evidences that are not brought in front of the
court at any level not at the dist. Level and also not in the high court, and which may be brought
forward in the review petition, the court gave time of 15 days to the appellate to bring the evidences
in front of court and then only it will decide whether they are brought in front of court earlier or
not.

DAY-17- 4TH OF JULY 2018

Visit to the Ranchi high court in to see the proceeding of the court in the case of
KHALKULLAH SHAH VS THE STATE OF JHARKHAND AND ANR Cr.Rev./136/2014

This case is related to matrimonial offences, the offence committed under sec 494 of the Indian
Penal Code 1860, in this case it was contended by the appellate that there are flaws in the
judgement of both dist. and the high court as the proceeding were not followed properly, the state
contended that the defects in the proceeding should be raised earlier, the court held that the defects
should be raised earlier and hence the petition dismissed.

Did research work on the ingredients of the offence of house trespass at night and also did research
work on the ingredients of house breaking at night.

DAY-18- 5TH OF JULY 2018

 Drafted an anticipatory bail application to be filed in the high court in Ranchi under section
438 0f the criminal procedure code 1973.

The anticipatory bail application is filled in favor of Alekh Singh, with hearing of the case
to be held later.

Did research work on the offences related to election from sec 171-C of ipc to sec 171-E, it was
mainly related to find out the ingredients of the offence and evidence required to prove the offence.

DAY-19- 6TH OF JULY 2018

Drafted a regular bail application to be filled in the Ranchi High court under section 437 of Cr.
P.C, it is to be filled later

Did research work on how sec 482 of Cr.PC can be used to quash an F.I.R and how the proceeding
of the offence can be ended.

Did some research work on sec 300 of the Indian penal code, related to the ingredient of the
offence.

DAY-22- 9TH OF JULY 2018

Visit to the Ranchi high court in to see the proceeding of the court in the case of

ANIRUDH BANERJEE VS THE STATE OF JHARKHAND AND ORS W.P.(Cr.)/385/2016

An interim application is filed in this case for suspension of application of sentence of the earlier
order of the high court, since this new writ petition is filled in the court, the state contended that
this writ petition is filled only to waste the time of the court and also the I.A is for the same matter,
so both of them may be dismissed by this court, the court will dispose the application in next
hearing.

SUNIL KUMAR SINGH AND ORS VS STATE OF JHARKHAND AND ORS

W.P.(Cr.)/154/2017

In this case writ petition is filed to stop the lower court from continuation of it’s proceeding since
the petitioners contended that the court is not working properly and making errors in taking the
evidence, the case is related to section 498 of I.P.C read with sec 34. The court has accepted the
writ petition and gave time to both the parties to raise there contention.

DAY-23- 10TH OF JUNE 2018

Visit to the Ranchi high court in to see the proceeding of the court in the case of

SHIV SHANKAR KUMAR YADAV ALIAS SHIV SHANKAR YADAV AND ANR VS THE
STATE OF JHARKHAND W.P.(Cr.)/349/2017

In this case petition is filled because of the irregularities in the proceeding of the palamu chief
judicial magistrate in the matter related to section 494 of the Indian penal code, the court held that
after hearing both the parties that the evidences were accepted properly and there is no irregularity
of the proceeding, hence the petition is dismissed.

NASIMA BIBI VS THE STATE OF JHARKHAND AND ANR Cr.M.P./1760/2016

This is the case related to extortion committed by the appellate, the contention of the appellate was
that, some evidences were not brought on record in any stage of the proceeding until now, the
respondents also presented there contention and for the disposal of the matter court gave next date.

DAY-24- 11TH JUNE 2018

TO BE FILLED BY HERSELF

DAY-25- 12TH OF JUNE 2018

Did some research work on section 378 and 379 of the Indian Penal Code 1860, and try to find out
cases and ingredient of theft,

Also did research work on sec 383 0f the I.P.C which is related to offence of extortion and tried to
find out the ingredient of the offence.

DAY-26- 13TH OF JULY 2018

Did research work on section 494 of Indian penal code 1860, and tried to find out in what scenarios
bigamy is permitted and what are the ingredient of the offence.

Did research work on section 498 of Indian penal code 1860, and tried to find out ingrient of the
offence and also tried to find out important case laws related to the section.

Did research work on sec 34 of the Indian penal code 1860 and find out important ingredients of
the section.