Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Abenilla
vs.
I. Facts
that offer short time admission (stay for less than 12 hours) and “wash up”
rates (stay for only 3 hours). Any violation would result to either P5,000 or
of declaratory relief:
3. 21 Dec 1992- White Light Corporation, Titanium Corporation and Sta. Mesa
of MTDC’s petition on the ground that the Ordinance affected their business
4. The petitioners agreed to submit the case for judgment since it was a based
Constitution
b. it went against encouraging private enterprises and the incentive to
need investment.
7. The City filed a petition for review on certiorari with Supreme Court, which
Appeals.
8. The City argued that the Ordinance was a valid exercise of police power
under Section 458 (4)(iv) of the Local Government Code and Art. 3, Sec.
10. Court of Appeal reversed RTC’s decision and found it to be constitutional for
Whether or not Ordinance No. 7774 of Manila is a valid exercise of police power
In view of all the foregoing, Ordinance No. 7774 of the City of Manila is
permanent.
IV. Reasoning
The ordinance in this case prohibits two specific and distinct business practices,
namely wash rate admissions and renting out a room more than twice a day. The
Police power is based upon the concept of necessity of the State and its
corresponding right to protect itself and its people. Police power has been used
The apparent goal of the ordinance is to minimize if not eliminate the use of the
covered establishments for illicit sex, prostitution, drug use and alike. These
goals, by themselves, are unimpeachable and certainly fall within the ambit of
the police power of the State. Yet the desirability of these ends does not sanctify
any and all means for their achievement. Those means must align with the
Constitution.