You are on page 1of 7
uF boeken: forme of Viiv by Exflocing Dynamic Expenence in Pry logy , the At, Propo Merapy , and Deselepmeut Daniel N. Shem Md lap 6 6. 06-0 —_ (NBAS). This stale is designed to evaluate the ies, as wel as Aisorganiaed passive, aggressive, rejecting et. This en then y.and voice. Parents are a spectacle to ply upon thet his works, 2 central sin: le psychological principle must be kept in mind. Asa stimulus getsstronger, the arousal tht itevokes gets pester. In dition, very aroused and ‘When te stimulus i too strong aversive and the infant wil try babies Become experts in suddenly filing asleep. "These re wide swings in arousl to downregulate thee level of arousal, Other babies become overloaded, their epulatory system falls, and they cry. These are the anlage of defenses snd coping mechs Iie (Stern, 1971, 1977, italy forms. ‘The baby will be optimally aroused to play and be happy in thezonea shor time before he ges overstimulated. To keep the sms, They ate necesary experiences for ‘Moreover, they have distinctive By the third or fourth timethe parent does thesame he baby willbe disinterested. Habituation determines the progressively slowing down her movements to tease anticps tion and ratchet up extemen while prepatng fr the"punch- Tine. o slow contouring of vitality forms to ay with Development of neurobiological aspects Jeap occurs (Emde & Harmon, 1984; Yamada ea, 2000), and itthen gos through a rita period of growth from roughly 10 with minima corti reulation, and th opennes ofthe early developing nervous sytem ta. Finally, we come back othe view ofthe primacy of move: ts dynamic features asthe developmental infiastve- ‘ure for what wil follow. Further questions about the experience and representation of vitality forms in development An inl question arses, Why did nature plan for babies nto speakand not to understand words forthe fst yet oro oftheir language arrives to me ‘non-verbal anlogic, namic Gestalt that are not compete ‘With the dicontinuous, digi, categorical mature of words, for whom), what you do wit your fae (and with whom), how ‘to ks, how to read body postions howto elicit another for food, for physical contat oo play, ‘We have tem sich knowledge impli relational knowing. leismon-conscious and non-verbal. Katlen Lyons Ruth mace by many cognitive paychologss, which we have to apply tothe rational domain. forms of interpersonal happenings are pat of knowing. One neds much dyna maton to reognize how someone moves, haw they ge angry and when their anger wil ces, or concerning thet cttetion, when are the ely, lly ‘The suggestion i a fellows Inthe east stages of infantis fist or predomina the most pry event andthe mos sent ba) 3t does not come alone. Movement takes motion willbe imbued wih fre. The elem fr gening the Golo manic iy fore, resent le, movement and her four daughters ‘the modalities ae not yet fully discriminated, However the ay forms are I this wees, smalton from any sensory ‘modlty would first be experiencedas dynamicflow of move ‘ment, contoured intima, imbued with force, and with an inte say, it would bea vitality form, a tal dynamic penta, 3 the very young, bat wth nd /pal. These appear tobe categorical difrences, but closer look shows that they ae miero-dymami, having to do with the ite time of sound in “plosives (the "p" and "5" (Eis 1971) The situation is complicated in that diferent ‘may ave dlfrent timetables fr dicrimination among ttc stimali because of anatomic, physiologic snd evolutionary fe tion could be acquired afte birth with appropriate experience. ‘Thisiscompaible with the new findings on multisensory ne rons (see above) and general iterconnectivity within the bain research advances to understand this farther. ‘Another take on vitality forms in infancy In Chapter 3, 1 suggested the notion o (italy form matching), where the moter uses ior to match the vitality form oft “purposely” elective kind of imitation, She imitates fthlly ‘he dynamic features, but with a different content ns diferent ‘modality. The concept of affect ttunement has been widely ‘sed afcliniallyhelpfl but tha oftenbeen confounded with appropriateness, oF "good mothering. stanly ar of ll hse, bu ass more ested sense. themother matches the dynamic features Thisassures the baby that she praspe what he ‘This may sound complicated, but patents have the in ‘senility and empathy todo al this without hiking, ‘underattunement” and “overattunement” or example, a child expresses delight in sing a toy machine gun ound in friend's house, and ets ox yep fj. themotherisnot lighted but doesnot want to squash powerful tool in the parents ongoing sociation ofthe infant into the ‘snimportantpatin thecal” shapingofbehsvor. Markova &Leperstee (206) asked what kinds of maternal responses are ial awareness and pos- Contingency te model sugested byte wok ergy ‘Watson (1999) and Gergely etal (1995). “Contingency”

You might also like