TE land marae vst Semester S.¥. 2019-2020 HOS sunaietnett m as course pescrtonion MaTnoDdioGY MATTERS Pmescaiaeo vexrsOoK ATTY. ROBERT NOMAR V. LEYRETANA ~ LECTURER. ‘his two (2) unit zourse is called Property Registration (Land Titles and Deeds, which would primarily aim to give students a review of the general concepts ofthe torrens system of fand titing and other land registration laws in the Philippines. ts purpose isto provide students the tools and legal understanding to effectively tackle cases Invoking al aspects of land and Interest therein ~ the nature of lond as classified under the Caasttution and statutes: the manner by which the State disposes pubic land and the mettod through which orginal Certcate of tite can be obtainee, proceedings subsequent to orginal registration, dealings with the Regist, of Oseds for subsequent registration and annotation of deeds and Instruments on 2 ie, with emphasis on the underlying principles of the Torrens System of repistration, as caued by the Property Registration Decree (PD. 529); the Land Registration aw [Act 496), and the Public Land Act (Act 241). The course (iftime permits) may also cover the Condominium Act, Chattel Mortgages and other land elated laws, Case assigoment, clase recitation, lecture discussion, research, and Registry ws (F Une permits) 1. Students wil be called ai random Tor reatation. “Any sic Goat who i not inside the Classroom at the time she/he is calls will automatically get 2 grade of $0 for char specie ectation 2. There willbe an unannounced short qui at the start of any candor cass, which shall over the tpi taken up inthe immediately preceding lass session, Flisre to take one ‘due tothe student's absence will merit a grade of 50 fer that specific quia, 3. Any student can go out of the classroom at any time witheut need of prior leave From ‘the profesior, provided that: (the class wlll moe be disrupted by his/her going out of ‘the clasroorn and (2) he assumes the risk of eing called for ectaton while being out classroom, thus, administrative rule number 1 sal pel 4. No open screen policy. Al electronic gaggets should be kept away from the desk ‘except notes and case lgestsin hard copy. ‘Giass Participation and Recitation Fil Examination — Mid-term Examination — 3K Total 00% No prescibed textbook. i important, however, that students MUST have & copy of the ‘CODAL Provision of PRESIDENT NO, 1529 (PROPERTY REGISTRATION DECREE) and ‘other related laws as may be erected in this Syllabus, i 1, et 496 Land Ristration Lowe 2. Commonwealth Act 181 - The Public Land Act $3. Aet 1120 Friar Land Act 4. Act 2859 The Cadastral Act 5. Act 3444- System of Registration for Unregistered Land {6 RA, 10023 Residential Free Patent Act 7.R.A, No, 11231 - Agricultural Free Patent Reform Act §,Aet 2508 The Chattel Mortgage Law, as amend ‘8, Repubile Act No. 26 Reconstitution of Certificates of Title 10, Republic Act No. 6732 - Administrative Reconstitution of Title 21. Agrarian Laws: 2) PD Ne. 27 ~ Land Reform Law of 1972 Db) R.A. 6657 - Comprehensive Agrarian taw €)R.A, 9700- CAR? 9. Extension Law 12.0. 957 - Subdivision and Condominium Protective Buyers’ Decree 13, Republic Act No, 8371 (Incigenous Peoples Rights Act ~IPRA] Republic Act 4726 44, Condominium Aet 415, Republic Act No, 10023 (Residential Fraa Patent Act} 16, Satas Pambars Bliang 185 117 Republic Act No. 9225 ~ Qual Cizenship Law _INTRODUCTION J Regalian Dectrine as enshrined in the Philippine Constttion: 1 Crut vs, See. of DENA, G.R. No. 125348, December 6, 2000 2 Sec. of DENRS. Yap, GR NO, 167707, Oct, 2008 3. Republics. CA, etal, GR. No. 15540, August 6, 2008 Sections 2,3, 7,8 Amiel Xi of the 1987 Constitution: Sections and 7 of CA 142 = Public Land Act Defiritio’ of Terms Land Tita isthe evidence of the owner's right or extent of interest, by which he can ‘maintain contol and asa rule assert right tothe exclusive possession and enjoyment of property, Deed isthe instrument in writing by which any cea estate or interest therein is ereated, alienated, mortgaged, or esigned, or by which tle to any real estate may be affected in Taw or equity. Land Registration isa judicial or administrative proceeding whereby a person’sclaim over 2 particular land is determined and contiemed or recagrized so that such land and the ‘ownership thereof may be recorded ino public eeaty Torcens System isa system for repistration of land under which, upon the landowners 2ppleation, the court may, after approprate proceedings, direct the issuance of 2 coricste of le Torrens Tite ia certificate cf ownership issued unde the Torrens System, through the Refister of Deeds, narning and declaring the owner of he real property described therein, feos fom ali lans and encumbrances excep: such a: may be expressly noted there of otherwise reserved bylaw. wrccstrarion or | Meaning of Registration tanp ries | in general, registration means any entry made in the books of the registry including the ‘anoneens J cancelation, annotation and even the martina nates. Initsstviet sense, isthe entry made in the registry, which record solemnly and permanently the rights of ownership and ether real rights. The mare presentation to the office of a registrar of Seeds of 3 document f not equivalent to recording oF registering the real pronerty. Functions of Rerstation| The three major functions of egistration are: 1. Publicity serves to give notice to al persons from time to time of such registering ing _and entering tat a certain party has or has acquired certain rights or interests in the property. 2. Prlorty serves to fx and datermine the relative rights of parties whether superior oF subordinate in elation to time, folowing the maxim “eiore tempore, prior jure” (first in time, first in law). Article 709 of the New Civ Code provides thatthe tes of ‘ownership er ether rights aver immovable property whlch are not duly inscribed or annotated inthe Registry of Property shall not prejudice thd person. 2. Security serves to provide registrants an archive for muniments of tite, rights and Interests in and recorded inthe registry where the property i locate. ‘Modes of Registration Registration may be by:Ti SAL BASS AN NATURE OF LAND secisraarion (secs. 1t03) 2.01529) 4. Transeription isthe entering inthe registration book by the eegisterof deeds ofthe rginalcericate of tle duly mumbereG, dated, signed and sealed issued pursuant to a cecree of registration, patent, award or gant. 2. Insertion, on the ther hand, is the recording on the certificate of title a fondu or an abstract ofthe instrument sought to be registered ation nds of agitation on of ttle or original registration takes piace when the te t land is made ecard for the fist time in the sume of its Swful oiner, ie refers to the Jon orocedure from the fileg ofthe application tothe issuance ofthe origina! coftite based an the decree of registration, patent, award or grant. As tots »Psinalregistrationis further elssiieg ito hich may ether be voluntary ordinary) or compulsory (caer) ative ~issvance af original thle by administrative agencies fon of deeds and other instruments or subsequent egistration, on the her Hs place when 2 deed or instrument affecting land's made of pubic record date ofits original registration. Thus, the registration of 2 see, morigege, achment, notice of levy oF other encumbrances falls within the purview of nt registration. The proceedings hereunder may refer either to voluntary oF Fy instruments riary transactions are the contracts or agreements wilfully executed by the hwner or his duly authorized representathe such a6 sales, leases, mortgeges, ations, exchanges, trust, or variations thereof affecting real estate. 'b. Involuntary transactions refer to those executed against the will or without the Consent of the landowner contrary to his interest ar wil affect him adversely such asattachment, levy on execution, saverse claim, ds pendens and other tens Rezalian Doctrine 1. Crunvs. See of DEN, G.R, No. 135385, Oecember 6, 2000 2,Set. of DENRvs Yap, GR No, 167707, Oct. 8, 2008 ‘3. Rapublicvs. CA, etal, GR, No. 155450, August 6, 2008 4. Juan baer de Aldecoa, vs. Te insulat Government, GR No, 3894, March 12, 1909 5. Anion, vs. The Government af the Philippine Wands, GR. NO.\-16213, August 23, 1919 Barpote asd Meaning ofthe Torens System of Rexistration 4. Legarda vs Saleeby, G.R No. 18936, October 2, 1915 2. Traders Royal Bank vs, CA, GR 114299, 9/24/98 3. Sps. Alfonso and Maria Argeles Cust vs. ills V. Domingo, G.R. Nos. 195825 & 155871, February 27, 2033 Distinction between a “Title” and a “Certicate of Tile” Dinah C. Castile Vs. Antonio M. Escutin, Et Al, G.R. No. 172085, March 13, 2008 Section 2, 2D 2529-_ Nature of registration Proceedings 26 3 ines Jonson ‘Manuela Grey Alba, etal, vs. AnacietoR, De La Crut, G.R No, 5246, September 16,1910 Section 2 Compared with Sections 51 and 52 of PO 2529 Purpose of registration of original certificate of tle and repctration of deeds and instruments affecting lands 1.Tomas Avera, 1, vs. The Honorable Milagros V. Caguoa, In Her Capacity As ludge Of The Regional Tal Cour, G 8, No. 65129, December 2eT FO.We. 1528) UNO ReastRATION AUTHORITY AND ITS AEGISTRIES OF DEEDS ‘Wections 14:38), ‘ORIGINAL 2. Appfestion 2 Juda Confirmation ‘olimpertet or Incomotote Tales Sec.48(b}ofthe Pub Land ae, CA. 163 2, The Government of the Philippine Islands, vs. Eustaqula Abale, et, a, G.R, NO. L4t342, November 28,1934 3. Garci vs, Court of Apseas,G.8. Nos. 48971 & 49021, lanvary 22, 1980, 95 SCRA 380, thot confit eaitered corer prevails, absolute? Spouses Hwa Ping and Mary Gav, etl, vs, Ayala Land, nc, GR NO, 173120/ 173141, July 26,2037) ion 8, PD 1529 - Dlscontin he Spanish Mor Presidential Decree No, 892 (February 16, 1976 NemencioC. Evangelista, et Al vs. Carmeline M, Santiago, {G.R No, 157447, Api 29, 2008) Eis 6.201502 Genel Prctions of he RA Adinsator Functions ofthe LRA as an office LRA Administrator i 3 the Judiciary although its fungtion, utlen of ‘Consulta brought to him and his act of lsuing deeroe of reietration i agmitealy» judicial ‘2nd quasi-judicial function 1LNobleas vs. Teehankee 6. No (-28790, Api 28, 1968), 23 SCRA 405, April 28,1968 Oi ofthe Repieter of Deeds; Generel Functions 1. oranda vs. Gusto, .R, Mo. 81163 September 26,1988 (265 SCRA 757) 2. Babin vs. Register of Deeds af llocus Sur, GR No 20611, May 1968) 3. Laburada vs AG.R, 108387, March 11,1998) 4. Angelos vs. Sec of lustice GR. No. 142549, March 9, 2010, 5. Vietoriano Betco,Vs1a Flor Oe Intal" GR No. 1589, June 17, 1822 Eagle Realty Corp, Us. Repubiic Of The Phil, Et Al, GR. No, 151424, july 4, 2008, Who may apply: Section 34 of 8.0. 1529 Section 18 (1h: Those who by themselves or through thelr predecessor-ininterest have been In ‘pen, continuous, exclusive and notorious possession and occupation of alienable and ‘Asposable lands ofthe publledomaln under a bona fide claim of oamershp since June 12,1985, or earlier. (2) Those who have acquired ownership of private lands by prescription under the ‘provision of existing lows. (Meaning of Possession” ond “Oerupetion” (Ong.vs, Republi, G.A. No. 175786, March 2, 2008 What are “Friar Lands" under Act 1220-Fiae Land Act CCanete vs: Genuine ie Company, GR. No, 154080, Jan, 22, 2008 ‘Section 3, Article 1987 Constitution {Lepublievs. IAC and ACME Pyweod and Veneer Co. (Dec. 29, 1986) 2 Republicvs, TAN, GR No, 154953, 26 June 2008, 585 SCRA.77 Section 7 and 8, Artie XI, 1967 Constitution ‘Batas Pambansa filang 85 RALNo,7O42-Ommibusinvestment Cole Seca3: Regisvation under the indigenous Poople's Rights Act 4 Forms and Contents of Pettion for ‘orginal ‘Aopcation of Tite (Section 14.38 ana 220190 1523) Dual citizenship aw (RA 9225) Code Brovision on In i dominium Act 4. Republics. Court of Appeals, GR No, 108998, Aug. 24,1994 2, Director of Lands vs, Buyco, GA Mo, 91189 November 27, 1992 3 Republicvs. Gunman, G.R. No. 132964, February 18, 2000 41 arate of Sera vs. Hels of Nernaer, GR. 142913, 8/09/05 ‘When. land of public domain allenable and disposable? 1 Susivs, Ra20H, G8 No, L-24066, December 9, 1925, 48 Phi 424 2 Republic vs. Doida! GR. No, 132963, September 10, 1998 3. Bracewell vs. C8, GR, 107427, 1/25/00 4 Francisco Chaves vi PEALAMAR, G.R, Ne, 133250, July 9, 2002 5. Coleedan vs. CendaRa, GR 155080, 2/50/08 ‘Republi vs. Manna Properties, GR. 146527, 1/03/0 7. Republics. Nagui,G.2, No, 144057, Ja, 17, 2005 1 Republic vs. Herbieto, GR. No. 156117 May 25,2005 (59 SCRA 181}, 9. Republics. Eneito, GR, 160145, 11/11/08 10. Hels ofthe Late Spouses Pedro S.Palanca, et.al. vs, Republic ofthe Philippines, GR. No 351312, August 30, 2005) 11. Buenaventura vs, Republic, GR No, 166865, March 2, 2007 412, Lmcoma Coop vs Republic, GR. 167652, 7/10/07" 43, Republic vs. TAN, G.R. No. 254953, 26 June 2008, 855 SCRA 477 14, Republic vs. CA, et.al, GR. No, 155450, Augut 6, 2008 45, Secretary of DEWR vs. yor Yap and Dr Saczy (6.8. No. 167707/173775, Oct. 8, 2008) 16, Heirs of Maria Malabanan vs Republic, 6.. No. 179987, April 29, 2008, 37. Republievs. Lee Tsa, GR. 168184, 6/22/09 18. Diaz. Republic (GR No, 161502, 611 SCRA 405, February 2, 2010) 19. Republic vs. Hanover Worldwide, G8, 172202, 7/92/10 20. Rapublievs Vege, GR No. 177790, January 17, 2011, 24. Vicente Yu Chang and Soledad Wu Chang, vs. Republic ofthe Philippines, G.R. No, 171726, Febrvary 23,2023 22. Tan v5. Republi of the Philippines, G.R. No. 193443, Apel 16, 2012 ‘3. Republic vs. Bantigue Point Development Corporation, 858 SCRA 158, March 14, 2012: ‘2. Sps, Fortuna vt. Republic, GR, No.173423, March 5, 2026 28, Republic vs. Hers oF Sin, G.R. 157485, 3/26/14 25. ta Tondena, nc vs, Republi ofthe Phipps, GR. No, 194627, August 5, 2015 26. Republic the Palippines vs. Sogod Devt. Corp, GR No. 175760, February 16, 036 27. Duma vs. Republic. GR No, 218768, une 6, 2038 2B. Republic vs. Vega, G.RNo. 177290, January 17, 201% Indigenous Peoples Rights Act UPRA) R.A, No, 8373 Sections 3,8, 12,38, 0 S20) ands Title Xv, Chapter, Section 4 (15), Administrative Code ofthe Philopines(E.0.292) oa i ‘Ancestal Domains and Ancestral Lands National Conmmission on indigenous Peoples (NCP Cruz v4 See. of DENR(G.R, No, 135385, December 6, 2000), nett fe were to file Seetione 2, 17, 110, 108, 208, and 109 of PD 1523; Section 34 of BP 129 as ‘amended by Section 4 of RA 7651 1.Repubiicvs,Santigue Point Dev' Corp, GR. No, 162322, March 24,2012 2 Tomas Avera, Vs, The Honorable Wilegrs V. Caguoa, GR. No, 65129, December 29, 3986 3,Phiippine Veterans Bank vs. Valenzuela G.A. No. 163830, March 8, 2032) ‘CLoppen is. Compas, GR No, 283968, Oct, 23,2015Opposition, Order of General Geta, Decree of Registration {Section 23 10 Section 49 of 1529) eps in’ Judie cprovidensel 20.529, Republic vs Hove OF Luisa Vila Able, eel, GR. No. (-3924E, Moy 7, 1976) Section 17, 9D 1579 Survey ofthe Lan 1.Sps. Wu Hae Ping and Mary Gav, et Al, vs Ayala Lan, ne, GA No. 173320/ 173141, ly 26,2017, 250s nfs Ping and Mary Gaw, et. Al, vs. Ayala Land, nc, GR. No, 173120/ 173344, April 10,2019} 30 on MR = Dusenting Qoinin of. Leonen Cargo A. ayaa Land, GR Ho, 165577, February 3, 2020 (612 SCRA.426, Feb 3, 2010) 4 Universiy ofthe Pilippines v- Rosario, GR No, 136865, March 28, 200% 5 Dei Rosario v. Republic, GR No. 148338, June 6, 2002 5 Repuniivs Sermlenta, GR, No. 169387, March 13, 2007 on 19,20 1529. Amendments of boundaries or ares 1 Benin vsTuazoa, GR. No. L-26127, June 28, 1978 2 Republic vs. Santos GR. No. 160853, Nov. 12,2012 3.Dream Vilage vs. Bases Devt Authority, G.A No. 192696, ly 26, 2013 ‘Section 22, Dealings with Lend Pending Registration ‘Generoso Mendora, vs. The Hon. Court of Appeals, GR, No, (36637 July 14, 1978 ‘oie of intial Hearing 1 Dwector of cands us. Chand Abistado, GR No, 102658, uly 28,1997) 2, Republics. Manne Properties, Ine, GR. No. 146527, lanuaey 3, 2005 3. Repubiie ws. Bantgue Peint Dev't Corp, G. R No. 162322, March 14, 2012) 4 Benin tal, vs. Tuason, et.al, GR. No. -26127 June 28, 197% ‘Section 23, 901828 - Director af Lands vs. Court of Appeals, et.al, GR, No. 102858. July 28, 3997) 6. Philippine Manufacturing Co, vs Impetal,G.R. No, L-24908, March 31, 182 [649 Phi. 122) 7. Section 26,PO 1529, Order of General Default - Amita Dotto, vs. The Register of Deeds for the Province of Cove, etal GA, No. 133465, September 25, 2000) 5. Republic vs. Estonlo, GR. 157306, 12/25/08 8 Mavs of Roxasvs.CA.GR. 118435, 3/21/57 120, Republic vs. Hevbieto, 6. 155197, 5/26/05, 31. Verges. CA, GR 125154, 9/28/02 12. Spouses Manuel vsCA, GR, 108228, 2/1/02 13. Heis of Lopes vs. Eniquer, GR. 145262, 11/23/05 14,555 v5. Chavez, GA. 151259, 10/13/08 35. Tan vs. Dumarpa, G.8. 138777, 9/22/08 26, Yu Chang vs. Republic, G.R. 171726, 2/23/31 00 Reauiced in Registration Proceedings {LRepublie vs. dela Pt (GR, No, 172631, November 35, 2010), 2 Republic ve. CA and Lapine (235 SCRA 576, August 24, 1894). ‘Republic vi. Hanover Worldwide Trading Corp. {G.R no. 17210, uly 2, 2010.) ‘Republic vs. Bantigue Point Development Corporation, GR. No, 162322, March 14, 2032) ‘Republic vs. TAN, G.8. No, 154953, 25 june 2008, $55 SCRA 477 6.Dumo vs, Republic GRINo. 218268, June 6, 2018) “Republic vs, Vega, 639 SCRA 5&1 2.00 Construction ¥s. Republi G.R, 179978, 8/31/11 9 Rosano-atiben vs. Republic, GR. 158449, 10/22/08 LORepublc vs. Alconaba, GR, 155012, 4/18/02 11 Spe Ramarate vs, Hernander, G3. 168222, 4/18/06 12_ Spouses Recto vs. Republi, G.R 160421, 10/04/08 13. Republic vs. Dela Pat, GA, 172631, 11/25/30 14, Paola vs, CA, GR 123953,45, BelRésivo ve Republic’ GR 148338, 676/03 36. Santiago vs, SBMA, GR 156485, 13/20/06. 437. Yu Chang vs. Republic, GR. 171726, 2/23/11 (dissenting opinion”) ssuance of Decrs of Rexistation ‘Section 30 elation to Section 35, 9D 2528) 1.Republic vs, Nits (6 R. Ho. 189555, sanuary 23, 2007) 2. Fajardo vs. Top Management Programs Corp, G.R No, 150462, June 15, 2012) 4. Tings. Heirs of tii, G.. No. 188913, Mareh 14, 2007 (518 SCRA 236) 5. Republic. Hers ofSancher, G.R Mo, 212388, December 10, 2018, 6 Republic Vs Yap, GR. No. 231116, February 7, 2018 won dons OCT takst ftect 1.Raros, vs Rodrigues and LRA, Go. $4033, Moy 23,3885) 2Repudc vs. Nilas (GN 159595, lanuar 23,2007) 3. aburad vs LR GR. No 103387 March 1, 1998 4 hamerta Dela Mares ve. Court of Appeal eal, G R. No. 17757, May 30, 1962) 5: Anest Colimeon,v Heirs of Fiomens Gumels, No. 63753, Morch 31,2006 6: Deogeres Rodrigue vs Court of Agpeals No. 184569, June 1, 2073 7. Manotok Realy vs, CLT Realty GR. No 12334, December 12,2007 and Resolstion dated faren33, 20031 | Beets Se 2019 Saal napon on between CADASTRAL land rerttaion_orocading and ORDINARY bad Proceesings (Sections | regisvation procoesings, 354038, 7O 1529) 1. Government ofthe Philippine sland vs, Abucal, GR No, 14367, August 14, 1919, 2.Dela Merced vs. Court of Appeal, GR No. L-17757, May 30,1962 "What ore non-rnistrable properties? Non-egstrabie 1 Santulan vs. Exec. Secretary (6.8. No.\-28028, 107 Phil. 567, Dee. 15,1977), properties 2. Repubiic vs, Court of opens and Lastimada (G.A, No. 39473, Api 30, 1973} 3 Republics. Arcadio van Santos, ,.R. No. 160453. November 12,2012] 4. cureg vs. IAC, GR, No, 73465, September 7, 1988 5. Article 457 & 461, Civil Code - Grande v. Court of Appeals, -176S2, June 30, 1962). {6.Celestalv.Cathopero, G.R. No, 142595, October 15, 2003 8. Reauble vs. Rosemoar Mining ard Development Corp, 6.2. No. 148927, March 30,2008) 9. Jose Menchaver, et. Al, vs. Facentino Teves, GR. No. 153201, January 26, 2005) 410. Republic ofthe Philippines vs. Courtaf Appeals, etal, G.R. Mo. 122269, September 30, 1999) 11. Republic ofthe Phifapines vs. Demacrite T. Mendoza, Sr, et.al, G.R No, 153726/354014, Maren 28,2007 412. Republe ws. Maxima Lensco, et.al G.R. No. 158918, August 9, 2005 13 Torres eta, vs. Garchitoren, etal, 6, No. 15366, Decermber 2002) 14 Laure ve Garcia, GR. No, 92013, July 25, 1990 35, Chover vs PEA-AMARI GR, No. 133250, 1uy 9, 2002 436, Chaver vs. NHA and Regis Romero (GR. No, 168827, Aug, 15,2007), eres able in Registration Cate ina nutshell .Remedies | Heits of Roxas ve.Garela GR No, 145208, August 12,2008 1. Mation for new tla or Motion or Reconsideration as the case maybe (Rule 37 of the ules of Cour ‘Appeal (Rules of Court) 3. Betiion for Ree from Judgment (Rule 38 of the Rulet Court) 4. Pevtion fr Review of Decree of Rogistration [Section 32, PD 1523) 2) Eland Piippines inc. vs. Garcia (GR NO. 373269, Feb, 37, 2030 b)Ricomedes |. Lorada, vs. Eulalia Bracewell, GR. No. 179155, Apri2, 2014 5. Action for Reconveyance vs. Quieting of Title 29} Emma Ver Reyes vs. Montemayor [G-R. No. 156536, apt. 3, 2008) Heirs of Roxas ws. Gacla, GR. 146208, 8/12/04 'b) Rodolfo w Francisco vs. Emilana m. jas, et.al. G.R. ne. 167120, April 23, 2014 «Yared vs, Tongeo, G8 No, 161360, October 18, 2011 {) Domingo Realty and Ayaa Steel manufacturing eo, Ine vs. Court of appeals, GR ‘No, 126236, Janvary 26,20074) Mair of Nagano vs. CA, G.R. 123231, 11/17/97 f)Secuya vs. Selma, GR. 136021, 2/22/00 ) Manangan vs. Delos Reyes, 6.8.115794, 6/20/09 hy Article 1126, Civil Code and Section 47, PD 3529 - DBT Mar Bay Construction vs: Panes (GR No. 167232, July 31, 2008} 1) Heine of Wage vz. Saeabia, G.R, 159133, 7/27/09 Ij Ameral vs. Bagumbaran, 68. No. 33261, Septemoer 30, 1987 1) PEZA vs. Fermander, GR. 138973, 6/06/01) 1 Heirs of Labanon vs, Heirs of Labanon (6. No. 160771, Aygust 14,2007, citing Vee. De Recntos. Iciong 13977} ‘m) Gasataya vs. Mabasa (6.8. No, 148147, Feb. 16, 2007) Action for ri state. (Section 101, CA 181 'a) Nemenco C. Evangelista, et, Al. vs. Catalina M. Santiago, (GR. No 157447, Apr'28, 2005.) 1b) Tancuation vs. Gempesaw, G.R. 149097, 10/18/08 ©} Weis of Nagano vs, CA, G.R, 123234, 11/17/97 4} (Aetlon for Reversion vs. Aetion for eancellatin of title) Spouses Galang vs Spouses Reyes, GR No. 168746, august, 2012 6} Estate ofthe late Yujuco vs Republic, GA. No, 168661, October 26,2007 ‘.Racavery from the Assurance Fund {section 95) 43) Development Bank ofthe Philippines vs. Bautista |6.R. No. L-24362, Nov. 29, 1968 ') Spouses Jose Manuel and Mara Sillanopouls vs. The National Treasurer, G8 No, 228678, July 3, 2018 «© Guzmanvs National Treasurer, GR. 143281, 8/3/00 Remedies Avalab ‘State hos lezal personality to ile cancellation of tle even it tte s privately owned ‘Eagle Realty Corporation, vs. Republic of the Philppines, etal, GR No. 15142, Jly 6 2008) aE | Section 39, PD 1529 Preparation of Decree and Certificate of Tide ccenninicate OF TT | 1 Alejandra De Los Reves, vt. Braulio Oe Vila, G.R, No. L-23514, November 12,1525 {sets 3950, 01 soe Vakvonte nde Rano, Marana Nabi, GR, No 2882, December 2, 1949 Section 40, 90 1529 ~ Entry of Original Cevtiicate of The Seqion4i = owner's Ouplicate copy of ‘Co-ouner’s copy of title ~ Balin vs, Registrr of Deeds of ilocos Sur, G.. No \- 20641, May, 1968 ‘Section 42, PD 1529 Registration Book ‘Section 43, PO 1529 Transfer Coticate of Tt Section 4,09 1529 = Statutory lien Affecting Title -Naawan vs, Cour of Appesls, G.R. No. 128573, January 23,2003 Key Concepts ofthe | Decree Binds the land wrssistem | Manotok vs. Heits of Homer Barque,G. R, No, 162325 and 262605, Dec. 18,2008 ‘Owmer’s Duplicate Cetificate (Section 41, 221520) So-owners copy of le 1 Balbin vs, Registrar of Deeds of Hlocos Su, G.R. No. L- 20611, May B, 1969 2 Remedios V. Geflorge, ws Hele of lon Melton. G R. No. 224825, July 3 2027 3, Reyes vs RavB-Reyes, GR, No, 21703, August 31, 1965 4 Abrigo vs. De Vera, GR. No. 158408, June 21, 2008 5. Repubicvs, Mendo7s, G,R. No, 183726, March 28, 2007 Statement of Personal Cucumstances [Section 45) {Litem vs. Espirit (GR, No. L-7644, November 27,1956) 2:Salae ve Agu (6.8, No. 202370, Sept, 73, 2033)Section 05,0 1529 ~Soiting/ ‘ConroFdation of Tle Section 50, #01529, ‘Consolation Plan, ~~ uaseaiient AgGISTRATION Sections 51-77 (901529) 12 Voluntary Dealings wit Regatered Lands 3 Horomen vs. Dasealia (6 R. Wo. 15810, 4b, 4, 2008) 4. Foreigner cannot own land but they can own the house or improvement on the lond ‘Willem Beumer Vs, Avena Amores, G.R, No, 295670, December 2, 2032), 5. Ventura vs. Spouses Abuda, GR No, 202932, October 23,201 6. Nora Catalong.Parulan vs, Rosario Calaang. Gara, GR No. 18148, 6/9/14 Aeglstored Lane Not Subject to Preerption [Section 67, PD 1525) 1.Cebrera vs. CA{G.R, No. 108547, 267 SCRA 338, Feb. 3, 1997), 2, Tiengca vs. Tongco (6.8. No, 161360, Oct. 19,2912) Certificate of Tite not subject to Collateral Attack Section a8) Section 8, 4 $700 (CARP Extersion Laut) 4LTaparuc ws, Vda de Mende (6.8. No. 152007, 512 SCRAS7, an, 22,2007 2 Rodrigues vs. Rodriguez (G.R. No, 175720, 632 SCRA 642, Sept. 11,2007 3, Amelia Doifo vs, Registrar of Deeds ofthe Province of Cavite, GR. No. 132465, September 25,2000 4, George Tolentino vs, Pacico Laurel, GR No. 181368, February 22,2012 5. Of ws. ll {GAR, No. 154270, March 3, 2010) 6. Esperanza Berboso, vs. Victoria Cabral, G8. No. 208647, July 10,2017 7. Deis T Sutton, vs. RomanitoP. tir, GR No, 161660, Decornber 3, 2012- . Mariano Dso.Ayan And. Marjun ‘Dao-Ayan, vs. The Department OF Agrarian Reform Adjusieation Board Of Bukidnon, G.R, No, 172308, August 28, 2007 Section $0, 90.1538 2.90 957 (subdivision Buyers Act! ~ Sections 2, meaning of “Subdivision Project “Complex subdivision Plan”; "Subd vislon lot", "Condominium Prolect™ and "condominium unt" Section 12, Section 22, Section 3 ‘section? of 9D 1216 (October 1977) ammencing Section 31 of PO 957, ~ logo definition of “open space” ‘miele of #0 1067 or the Water Code [Section 15 ofthe JRR of Republic Act No. 8974 (November 2000)- An Act to Facitate the ‘Acauisilon of Right-of-Way, Site o¢ Location for National Government infrastructure Projects nd or other Purposes." 6, White Plains Associaton, In, ve. Hon. Godoteedo L Legaspl, GR No. 95522, February 7, 1992, 7, white Pains Homeowners Assecation, Inc. vs. Cour of Appelas GR No. 128131, October 8 vs. Ontiges and Company Limited Partnership, GR No. 171486, March 3, 2024 9, Resublc of the Pippines Vs, Spouses Francisco & Llamas, G.A. No, 184190, January 25, 2017 9, Presidential Oscres No. 1271 Committee vs. Glola Rodriguer Oe Gutman, GR No. 367291/1873%4, December 5, 2018 10. Republic (represented by the Acting Commissioner of land Registration! vs. Court of ‘Appeals, GR No, 116111, January 21,1595 11. China Banking Coro vs. Benjamin Co, GR No, 174568, September 17, 2008 12. Magéalita¥, Tang vs, Court of Appeals, GR No. 117208, February 1, 2000 Sections $4, 52, PO 1529 1. Inve Consulta filed by Att. Vicente J Francsico on behalf of Domingo Cabentog, GR No. L 145192, Apel 10, 1938 2 Gurbax Singh Pabia & Co, vs, Reyes and Tantoco,G.R, No. L-3970, October 28, 1952 5 Elie D. Gabriel vs. Registrar of Deecs of Raa, GR No, 17956, September 30, 953, 4. Teodoro Almirol vs. The Registrar of Deeds of Agusan, GR No.- 2486, March 20, 1968 5. Office of the Ombudsman vs Rico C. Manalastas, GR No. 208264, ly 27, 2016 Jessie 1. Campugan and Robert. Torres vs, Atty, Federico , Tolentino, Atty: Renato G. ‘Cananan, ty, Bale , Vietorio, ir, and Atty. Elbert T.Gulala, AC No. 8263/8725, March 33, 2015, Sections 53, PD 1529 (Presentation of Owner's Duplicate Copy of Tile) {Philippine National Bank vs, Jose Benares Fernand, G.. No, 42109, May 12,1935,2 Rodiquezv-Liorente, GR No U2GEAE, Becember 34, 1536 3, Saberon vs Ventana {6.%. No, 182665, April 21,2014) [rea also Dissenting Opinion of Justice Velasco 4. Frenavs. Querre-Kautman {une 6, 2006, 492 SCRA 298) 5. Fule vs. Legare GA. Mo, L-17951, February 28, 1963 6. Torres vs. Mota, G.A.No.L- 63046, une 21,1980 7.595. Dominador Peralta, vs. Heirs OF Bermardina Abslon Represented Sy Mansueto Abalon, /G.R.No, 183¢64/1828A8, une 30,2014 £8. Hers of Eduardo Manipat Vs, Court of Appa and the Register Of Deeds OF Meycauaya, G-No. 125585, une 8, 2005 ‘Section 56, PO 1529 [Primary Entry Book) 4. Saberon ys. Ventana [6.8 No. 192669, Apri dustice Vel 2. DBP vs Register of Deeds of Nuev2Ecijz, UOK No, 7674, June 23, 1986. 3, Nationa Housing Authority vs Augusto Basa, G.R, No 149121, Api 20,2020, 4, Autocorp Group and Rulogranties, vs. Court Of Appeals and Keppel Monte Bank, G.R No, 157553, September 8, 2008 5. Durawood vs. Candie Sons, 6.8, No, 178984, anuary 28, 2012, 5. AMPILvs Reisrar, Register of Deeds, Pasig Cty, (GR. No 152685, G.8. No, 199115, July 3, 2033) 7. Ay. Plaridel M, Minoo vs, Land Registration Administrator, GA, No. 97282, August 16, 3991 8. Arelta Dotto vs. Registrar of Deeds ofthe Province of Cavite, GR. No. 133465, September 25,2000 9, Hairs of Datu Oslandag Kul vs. Danial A, Pia, GR Ro, 199777, June 17, 2035 (Section $7, PO 1528) 2014} [Read als Dissenting Opinion of Double Sales 4. San Lorenzo Development Corporation vs.CA, etal. (GR. No. 124242, January 21,2008) 2.Gecita Amodia Vda Ge Melencion vs. CA, G.A. No. 148846, September 25, 2007 3. Antonio ws. Santos (GR. No. 148238, 538 SCRA 1, Nov. 22, 2007) (elae this case to: DBT Mar Bay Construction vs, Panes (GR No, 167232, July 31, 2008) Innocent Purchaser for Value — Buyer in good faith 1LBuyer failing to demend forthe Oumer's for the owners copy ofthe tite Islamic Directorate ofthe Phils. vs. CR, GA. No. 117897 2.Property owner deprived of his property becouse of the gross negligence of her lawyer ~ Legarda ¥. CA,et, Al G.R No. 98457 October 16,198 3.Buyer pronounced Buyer In good feith even if the SPA presented to him wos found to be falsified» Chua vs, Soriano , GR. No. 1S0086, Ape 23, 2007 4.Financol Institutions Uke GSIS have o higher degree of due dligence ~ Alejandro Ty vs. ‘Queen's Row Subdivision In, GR. No, 273188, December 4, 2008 ‘Banks is required higher due dilgence its business being imbue with public imerest and the tule thot persons dealing with registered lands can rely solely onthe cetieate of ttle does ‘not epolyta banks ~ 1. Paitrust Bank ws. Court of Appeats, GR No, 150318, November 22, 2010 2, Spouses Emlana L alba, Sc, vs. Philippine National Bank, G.R. No, 177803. August 3, 2015, ‘other cases on Morizagce in good fath Section 60, PD 1528 1.e ta Merced vs. GSI, eta (365 SCRA 1, Sept. 11, 20011 2 Erona vi Querrerkoutman, GAR. No. 165853, June 22, 2005 Relate Ils to Fle vs. Legare G.R.No.{-17951, February 28, 1963; and Torres vs. Mota, G.R.No.L- 63086, une 21,1990), Sale Involving Real estate 1 fsguerca vs Trinidad, GR No, 169890. March 12,2007 2, Del Pradovs.Cabatero, GA, No. 148225, March 3, 2010‘Caveat Emptor Principle 1 Sy us. Capistrano (GR No. 184250, July 28,2008) 2.Domingo Realty Ws CA, GR No, No, 126235, January 26, 2007 RealEstate Mortgage (Section 60,00 15291 section a 1791 {General Banking Act of 2000) Golcenway Herchacdsing Corp. vs. Equitable PCI Bank, G.R, No, 195540, March 13, 2013, BIR Revenue Crcula No_ 0543 dtd Nov, Foreclosure of Mortgage ‘Article 225, Gil Code - Mobi Ol Philipines Vs. Diacares, (GR. No. 1-26371 9/30/3969) ‘Gonzalo Puyat& Sone nc vs. Philippine National Bank, G.A. No. -16843, Apri 30, 1962] ion 18,00 957 - 4LHome Bankers Savrgs vs. A, et ab [Git No, 128354. April 26,2005, 2. United Overseas Bankvs. 10'S. Manager Bullets Ine, GR No, 162133, June 23, 2005 (Read also Dissenting Opinions of lustice rion and ustce Leoren} ‘inoluncary — Dealings 1.Gotaucov, RO, Taysbas, GR. No L 39596, March 23,1938 2. Spouses Bulaong vs. Gonzales, G.R.No. 155318, Sept 5, 2012, 3. Siien Steet Corporation, vs. Court of Appeals .R No. 142013, October 15, 2002 AierseClais (Sec. 70,80 1529) Wiistare the elements of a valid Adverse Claim 1LGSISvs. Court of Appeals, G.R a. $6290, January 30, 1985 25ps. Francisco Rocrguer vs. CA, GR No, 142687, July 20, 2008 3. Register of Deeds af Quezon City vs. Niandro, G.. No. 16448, April 23,1561, 4 LP. Leviste & Company, Ine, vs Hon. Aaonio K. Noblelas, G.R. NO. L 28529, April 30, 2979 5. Sajonas vs A, G.R, No. 202377, July, 1996 6 Roarguen us CA, GR, No. 142687, Jul 20, 2005 7. Golden Haven Werotal Park vs. Finest [6-8 No. 188265, Nov. 17, 2010) B.MichaeiC, Bisa Al, ws Hon. Cullio C. Cit Il, Court af Appeals G.R. Sp. Mo, 132396, lune 10,2016 9, Pat Ty Sin Teivs. Jose Lee Dy Piao, GR No. 111271, May 28, 1958 210. Gabriel v, Register of Deeds of Ria, .R. No L-17956, September 30, 1963 11 Arazoia vs. Bemas, GR. Na, 29740, November 10, 2878 12. Dat ws, Santos Dir, CA $4 0. 6.8082 13. Graclano Ds Los Faye, vs Miario De Los Reyes, GR. No. {-4126, une 30, 1982. 14. Estelle vs. Register of Deeds of Rize, G.R. Nes. L12614 and 12515, January 28, 1960, 15. Cathay Metal Crp vs, Laguna West Mult-Purpose Caoperatv, In, (G.R. NO. 172204, uty 2.2018), 26, Daranla-Toseco, et.al ws. CA(G.R. No, 120624, Dec 3, 1999) 17 Director of Lande vs. Siveretra Ababa, eta, G.R. No. 26096, February 27, 1979) Section 71, P0 1529 Surrender of Owner's Duplicate Copy ofthe Title COMPARE histo Section 107, PD 1529 - Surrender of Withhold Owner's Duplicate Copy of title Section 75, PO 1529 Application of New Certieate Upon Expiration of Redemotion Period 4: Padila i. vs. Phil Producer's Coaperatve, GA, No, 181256, uly 25,2005 compare this case to ia Toledo-Banage and Jovita Tan vs. Court Of Appeals, G.8, No, 127943, January 28, 1999 3.Flor Martines vs Ervesta , Gari, etal, .A. No. 156535, February , 2010} jon 263 of toga! Government 1A 7160) Purchase of Property By the Loca! Government Unis for Went of Biden Pubic Aztion for nan payment of Real Property Tx (COMPARE this to: Suction 75 of PD 1529 -Anplcation for new cortifcate upon expiration of redemption period Ais Pendens See. 76,001529)RégisaATION or PARTITION {Sections 7892) ‘ASSURANCE FUND (Sections 33-102) ésisTRATION Parents (see 103) FIN OF LAND TRANSTER, eMMANCIPATION paren (seetions 108-105) of {Magdalena Homeourers Association, Inc. vs. Court of Appeals, GR, Ne. 60223, Apr 27, 3890, 2Viewmaster Construction vs. Maul, eta. (GR Na, 136283, Feb. 28, 2000} 3.AMlanticErecers, Inc vs. Herbal Cove Realy (399 SCRA 409, Merch, 2003), 4S Maryvs RO Makati (6.8 No. 174280, ian, 20, 2009) 5. Emma Ver-teyes vs, rene Montemayor, 6.8. No, 165546, September 2, 2009) 6 Delfin , Voluntad vs. Spouses Dizon, G.R. No, 13229, august 26, 2999 2. Epitacio R, Tangotan, vs. Court OF Appeals, G8. No. 123852, December 21,2004 8 Daniel C. Vilarvevs vs, Court af Appeals, GR. No. 117108, November 5, 1997 9. ely L Luym & Paterno L.Luym, Je, vs. Register of Deeds of tapulapu City, G.R,Ceb. Sp No. (08188, Apri 28,2017 10. at Ty Sin Tews. ose Lee Gy ito, GR No, L-13273, May 28,2958 11. Spouses Henry Gm and Rosaria T. Ln, vs. GR. Wo, 183646, Apil4, 2003 12. Enrique Somes, vs. The Government of the Philppine sands, No -427S4, October 30, Sps. Conrado and Ma. Corona Romero vs. CA ard Orden /G.R, No. 142406, May 16, 2005) asim Construction Supplies, nc. vs. Registrar of Deeds af as Pinas (6.8. NO. 168555, July 010) Martin V, Bravela, vs. luge Ruben A. Mendiola (AM, No, AT-O0-1SS0, July , 2000) beron vs. Ventana, .A. No. 192688, apn, 2014 lar Martinez vs. Emesta G. Garcia, eta, G.R. No, 266536, February 4, 2010 9 (Gunrende of Gumers Duplicate Com of the Tite) — lia Toledo-Banaga and Jovta Tan vs Court of Appeals, .R. No. 127941, Jonuary 28, 1999 2.Abaé, etal, ve. Flbomes Reaty, GR. No, 188229, Nov. 2, 2020. 2. stella RealEstate vs, CA, GR. 128862, 9/30/99 4. Doronila-Tiosecovs. CA, GR. 12063, 12/03/99 ‘ection 96, PD 1829 Giims agains the Assurance Fond Torres vs Court of Appeals (.R, No. L-63046 une 24, 1980) ‘Section 103, PD 1529 (Certificates of Titles pursuant to pubiic land paterts) 4 Alora vs. CEC, GR. No, 188471, April 20,2010} 2 Teguinod vs. CA, $33 SCRA 403) 3, Fontanilavs. CA, GA 118361, 11/29/98 ic vs. Gurman, G.R, 105630, 2/22/2000 5. Ramera vs CA. GR. 108307, 11/25/00 6. Abejeron vs, Nabasa,G.R 84832, 6/20/01 2. He eof Santiago ws. Santiago, GR. 151440, 6/27/03 # Spe Morandarevs. CA, GB. 123886, 3/12/04 9.PNB vs. Sanataa, GR. 14922, ¢/07/08 10. Lozano vs. Tabayag, 65 SCRA 33 121 Aims Delos Santos, G8. 172574, 7/31/08 A 10023 — Residentia Free Patont Act fi sion 105,90 1538 Centfc ‘RA.S§S7- Comprehensive Agatian Reform Law of 3988 What isa Certificate of Land Ownership Aware (CLOAY? ‘What ie pation Patent?PETITIONS AND ACTIONS AFTER onIGiNAL REGISTRATION (Sections 107-110) ered inthe ft ‘and gatakes ofthe nature of indefeasblty of regular tle Depertment Of Agrarian Reform vs. Romeo C. Carried, G.R. No.1 76549 ‘Section 107, PO 1529. Surrender of withhold Dupleste Certificate of 7 Tugon ws. Ca (268 ScRa 893, une 1, 1995) 2 Toledo Banaga vs. Court of Appeals, GA. No. 127962, January 28, 1999 3 Patil, vs. Phil Producer's Cooperative, G.R, No. 141256, July 15, 2005, Section 108 - Amendmont ang Alteration of Cartifieatet Second paragraph of Section 108 in ‘salto fo Section 2 of PO 1529, 4. Opuen vs. Compas GA No. 203965, O=t. 21,2015, in relation to Phillppine Veterans Bank vs. Valentusla 6.8 No, 163530, March9, 2011) 2, AMPIL ys Repstrer,Hegister of Deeds, Pasig City (G.R, No 192685, GR, No, 199115, uly 31,2013), 2. aia Bagoyas vs Rogelio Bagayas, G.A. Nos. 187308 & 267517 September 18, 2013, 4. Tomas Avera, rus. The Honorable Milagros V.Caguioa, n Her Capcity As Judge Of The Aeqiaral Tria! Court, GR, No, L65129, December 28, 1986 5, Olna vs. Republic, GR. No, 163118, Ape 27, 2007 6. Phiippines Cotton Cor. vs. Gagoomal (G.R. No, 130389, Feb. 11, 2008) ‘Section 109, PD 1529 - Notice and Replacement of tost Duplicate Certificate 1 ilanuevs eta vs. Vira, et al, GR. No. 185808, March 14, 2008 2-Repubiic of the Priipaines, vs Court of Appealsand Vicente L Yupangco, Ir, G.R- No, 128521, October 26,1999 3. Joy Vanessa Mt Sebastian, vs, Spouses elton C. Cr, etal, GA, No. 220840, March 20, 2017 4. Foidana vs. Zalduar, GR. No, 162593, Sep. 26, 200 5: Josefina C,Blte, vs. tmelda Solis eta, GR No, 181057, June 17,2025 6. Luciano P23, vt Republe ofthe Piippines, G.8. No, 187367, Yowerber 23,2011 Section 110,20 1529 -Raconstitution of Lost or Destroved Original Torrens Title BA25= An Act Providing for Special Procedure for Reconstitution of Title Is theve » diatnetion between Section 110, BD 1529 and RA 26? Heirs of Susana De Gutman Tuston vs, Hon. Court of Appeals, GA No, 125758, fanuary 20, 2004 Republic Act No. 6732 An Act Allowing Ad Original Copies Of ‘Carlictes of Tits Lost or Destroyed Due to Fre, Flood and other Force Male, ‘Amending forthe purpose Section 10 of PO 1529 and Section § of RA26 ‘SUPREME COURT ADMINISTRATIVE CIRCULAR NO, 7-96 ON THE MATTER [RECONSTITUTION 1.Jose 8, Lr, Petitioner, Vs. Republe OF The Philippines, Respondents, G.R. No. 208848, february 24, 2016 2, Republic vs. Cattaroja, GR, No. 171774, Feb. 12, 2010 3. Alabang Development Corboraton, eta, vs Nicolas A, Pascoal, G.R, No, L-S4034, August 30,1982} 4, Canera vs. Unversity ofthe Philippines, G.. No. 156380, September, 2004 5, Sant Mary Crusade to Allevst Poverty of Brethren Founation, Inc, vs. Hon. Teodoro, Fel Acting Presicng Judge, Regional Trial Court, C.. No. 176608, January 12, 2035 6. Evangeline .Puton, vs, St, Lucia Realty And Development, In, GR No, 239518, March, 2001 5 Feliisimo L Obriasa and Pastor C,Oflan, vt. The Cty Government Of Quezon Clty, A. No. 149190, December 19,2006. 3, Recubiicvs, Spouses Donato Sanche2, 6. No. 146081, July 37, 2006 49, Republi ofthe Pilppines, vs. Pedro. Casimir, GR. No, 166139, June 0, 2006, 10. rector of ands, vs. Court of Anpeals, G.R. No. -4S168. Janvary 27, 2981 11 Doleres A Cabello and Teoile Abellanasa, vs, Republic ofthe Philippines, CR, No. 142820, August 18, 2608, 42, Leoncia Alin, vs, Court of Appeals, GR No, 227523, March 22, 1999 i13-Teotlo Cacho, ve. Court of Appeats, GR Mo. 125361, Mareh 3, 1997 14. The Register of Deeds of Malabon vs. RTC, Malabon, GR. No. 88625, February 5, 1990 15. Che Borromeo-Gercia, vs, Judge Ernesto P.Pagayatan, AIM, No. RT) 08-2127, September 25,2008, formerly OCA PI No. 07-2697-RT) 15. Regalado vs. RTC, QC, G.R. No. 89366-67, January 31, 2000 17-The Phippine Cotton Corporation, vs, Nataingas Gagoomal, et, 3, G.R. Ne. 130389, Februaey 11, 2008 1B. Heisof Venturanza vs Resublic, GA, No, 169122, lly 27,2007 19, Republi ofthe Philipines, vs, DamvnadorSantua, GR. No. 155703, September 8, 2008 stopoel in Action for Canceitation of Title |LBarstowe Phils Vs. Republic (6.R. No. 153110, Mar. 2, 2007) 2 Yuiueo vs. Republic, GA. No. 168661, October 26, 2007) ees, SPECIAL FUND seca) Forts USED iN {ano ReaistRaTiON [AND CONVEYANCE (see. 112) Seales wat UNREGISTERED LAND | 1 Raciowesltn ve, Palla, GRNo, 62422, May 20, 1991 Sec. 123, 90 1529} | 2. NemencioC. Evangelita, et. Al. vs. Carmeling M. Santiago, {6.R. No. 157447, April 29, 2008) 5. Oniges Plzs Deut Corp us Atty. Eugenio Tumulak, AC No. 11385, March 14,2017 REGISTRATION OF charreL MORTGAGES ‘CONSULTAS | 1.Teodora Amiel va The Regitrar of Deeds of Agusan , GR No. - 23486, March 20,1968 (Sectiont17) 2.Bor-Mar Res and Sport Corporation vs Sp. De Guzman, G.. Nos. 18233637, August 29, 2008 3. Angeles vs. Sec. of Justice G-R. No. 182548, March 8, 2010 4. Laburada vs. RA, GR No, 207387 March 11,1998, 5, Doronlia Resources Dev. Inc. vs. Court Of Appeals, G., Nos -42956-57, January 22, 1988, 6 St. Mary of te Woods School, Inc vs. Office OF The Registry Of eeds OF Makat City And HiaroP.Seriano, “THE CONDOMINIUM 3 afintion ACT (R.A 6726) 1. Warrantag and Representations | Plus AUS Management Corp. (6. No. 151824, Apri 36,2008) «Redemption of Mertgaged Amortization 1 e Vera ve. Court of Appeals (6.8. 132869, October 28,2001) 4. Suspension of Monthy Amortztion |.Gold Loop Properties Inc v5. CA(G.R, No. 122088, anwary 26, 200%) Alteration of Plans GOAL Ine. vt, Cour of Appeals (6A. No. 118822, July 28, 1997) ‘SUBDIVISION AND 2. aedcion of the LORE conpominuint PROTECTIVE BUYER'S DECREE (P.0. 957) |.OeiaCruzvs. Court of Appeals (6.8. No. 148180, November 37, 2008)