Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Formulation
Strategies
for Topical
Drugs M AY 2 0 1 8
Y
ears ago, when excipients Another problem is the fact that every
were called “fillers” or “inac- formulation is different, says Alyn Mc-
tive ingredients,” drug-product Naughton, director of analytical and product
quality testing was simple. The development, Encap Drug Delivery, a divi-
traditional approach, however, often sets sion of Capsugel Dosage Form Solutions.
the stage for process variability and manu- “Excipients are used functionally to achieve
facturing and quality problems. different objectives, including bioavailability
Today, more is known about the poten- enhancement, dose homogeneity for low-
tial interactions that can occur between dose drugs, high-potency safety, and abuse
excipients and active ingredients, as well resistance. As such, each product must be
as the impact of raw-material variability considered individually within the lens of its
on the final drug-product quality. Quality specific function and desired outcome.”
assurance is evolving to a multidisciplinary A simple “cream” may contain several
approach that requires an understanding excipients, solubility enhancers, and par-
of materials properties on the molecular tially dissolved API, and may distribute the
and physical level, and of critical quality drug in a potentially complex or dynamic
attributes (CQAs) and potential product way. Sameersingh (Sam) Raney, scientific
failure modes. lead for topical and transdermal drug prod-
Taking a quality-by-design (QbD) ap- ucts at FDA’s Office of Generic Drugs, and
proach can be difficult when dealing with former professor of pharmaceutics at the
semisolid dosage forms because of their North Dakota State University, reminded
complex flow behavior. Some semisolids attendees of the challenges at a special
can act like a liquid and a solid within the session on October 2015, at the 2015
same formulation at different times and American Association of Pharmaceutical
under different conditions. Scientists’ (AAPS) meeting in Orlando, FL
2 M AY 20 1 8 | P H A R M T E C H
Semisolid Topical
Functional Excipient Formulation
Optimizing Semisolid
Dosage Formulation
Forms Trends
Excipients Selection Development Dosage Forms
(1). Given the complexity of creams, he stat digestion testing is typically used to
said, several different attributes may be quantify solubility improvement for lipidic
crucial to product quality, and several fail- bioavailability-enhancement projects, while
ure modes may be possible. Approaches x-ray powder diffraction and differential
will need to take multiple factors into scanning calorimetry are usually applied
account. Excipient selection can have to characterize amorphous dispersion and
a significant impact on performance at- crystalline suspensions, he says.
tributes, as Norman Richardson, Global DPT scientists are focusing on micro-
Technical Marketing Manager, Skin Deliv- structure, Bhatia says, which is directly
ery at BASF Pharma Solutions, explained related to factors and conditions on the
at the meeting. Research is under way manufacturing floor. Understanding mi-
to help clarify some of these issues. This crostructure allows processes to be opti-
article reviews some of the work going mized, according to Bhatia.
on in this area. Scientists use microscopy and laser
diffraction to analyze microstructure, and
Traditional Testing Cannot then take mechanical measurements us-
Address Variability ing a micelle counter (typically, a Clemex
Traditional quality testing for semisolid image analyzer or laser diffraction device
dosage forms typically focuses on viscos- attached to a computer).
In addition, rheology, which observes
ity, the effects of changes in temperature,
how stress affects product flow, is being
and flow. Although these test methods
used to study the compounds. Plotting
may be indispensible, when used alone, sheer stress vs. sheer rate results in a
they are not sufficient in examining poten- curve that can be used to help predict
tial for variability, says Kuljit Bhatia, vice- product behavior under different condi-
president of research and development tions, Bhatia says.
at DPT Labs and a North Dakota State “We are taking a step-by-step process to
alumnus. “These compounds contain examine emulsification, chemical stress, me-
emulsions, composed of an oil phase chanical stress, process development, and
and a water phase, with surfactants and other factors including cooling and the impact
of changes in temperature,” Bhatia says. One
emulsifiers. We keep all these ingredients
goal, he adds, is to ensure that laboratory ma-
together on a shelf for two years during
terials are the same as scale-up materials and
stability testing, but how can we ensure that such factors as globule and micelle size
they are stable?” he asks. are uniform from batch to batch.
Test selection usually depends on the Michael Lowenborg, DPT Labs’ senior
target product profile (TPP) of the dosage manager of R&D formulation and process
form and the formulation composition, development, explained the “microstruc-
explains McNaughton. For example, pH- ture” approach to studying emulsions
3 M AY 20 1 8 | P H A R M T E C H
Semisolid Topical
Functional Excipient Formulation
Optimizing Semisolid
Dosage Formulation
Forms Trends
Excipients Selection Development Dosage Forms
at the AAPS session (2), and gave an in microstructure can affect nonphysical
example of how this approach was used attributes such as in-vitro release.
to optimize the formulation and process Capsugel is also applying QbD principles
development for an emulsion, working to semisolid dosage forms, from the very
back from results in the lab to process de- start of the design process through to
sign and equipment selection. Part of the clinical and commercial manufacture, says
work involved optimizing the hydrophilic- McNaughton. “The understanding and con-
lipophilic balance (HLB) and mixing and trol of CQAs and CPPs, from the concept
temperature of emulsification. stages of dosage form design, helps mini-
Applying design-of-experiments (DOE) mize any impact of manufacturing later in
and scale-up studies offers insights into the process,” he explains. “It is important
the critical process parameters (CPPs) to determine both the tolerances of for-
and CQAs at each process phase. Future mulation and excipient ratios and combina-
work, he said, will focus on how variation tions and the processing parameters used
Unlike homogeneous systems, where was varied, and the ointment structure
final product attributes depend solely studied under cross-polar microscopy,
on quantitative and qualitative at- bright regions showed less crystalline
tributes, creams, ointments, and gels areas. Rheological studies then revealed
are heterogeneous, and depend on ad- the impact of viscosity and shear thin-
ditional factors such as temperature, the ning. In studies of product stability, the
order in which ingredients are added, amount of one of the glycols was varied
shear, packaging conditions, excipient and evaluated with cross-polar micros-
source and grade, and storage time, copy. At 5%, fluid weeping occurred
explains Norman Richardson, Global immediately. At 20%, it took seven days.
Technical Marketing Manager, Skin De- Formulations with 25–30% of the glycol
livery at BASF Pharma Solutions. Tests were found to be the most stable.
have been done on simple ointment
systems containing two different poly- REFERENCE
ethylene glycols and solvent to better
1. N. Richardson, Controlling the
understand issues (1). The best sensory
Physical Properties and Performance
properties were achieved by balancing of Semisolid Formulations Through
fluid, gel, and solid states. When the Excipient Selection, Pharmaceutical
molecular weight of one of the glycols Technology webcast, June 10, 2015.
4 M AY 20 1 8 | P H A R M T E C H
Semisolid Topical
Functional Excipient Formulation
Optimizing Semisolid
Dosage Formulation
Forms Trends
Excipients Selection Development Dosage Forms
5 M AY 20 1 8 | P H A R M T E C H
Semisolid Topical
Functional Excipient Formulation
Optimizing Semisolid
Dosage Formulation
Forms Trends
Excipients Selection Development Dosage Forms
hire mainly PhDs in formulation, but also course, more pharmaceutical sponsors are
more professionals with advanced semisol- proactively demanding that QbD methods
ids experience using rheology and IVRT. be used for their projects. As a result,
“Multi-disciplinary teams are a key compo- convergence is being seen between
nent of our formulation approach to customer name-brand and generic-drug sponsors,
projects, regardless of problem statement, Bhatia says. “NDA clients tend to ask
TPP, or finished product presentation,” says for QbD explicitly, while generic-drug
McNaughton. Such teams are mainly com- manufacturers may not ask for it at first,”
prised of fundamental scientists, including he explains. “Given FDA’s mandate to use
materials scientists. They often complement question-based review (QbR), however,
customers’ teams, which are generally ap- more companies see they are going to
plied science-focused, he says. need QbD-type data anyway, so they real-
While both companies recommend a ize they will need to use newer methods
QbD approach to clients as a matter of to evaluate their products and processes.”
6 M AY 20 1 8 | P H A R M T E C H
Semisolid Topical
Functional Excipient Formulation
Optimizing Semisolid
Dosage Formulation
Forms Trends
Excipients Selection Development Dosage Forms
can be used at various stages in the manu- FDA is funding a number of research
facture of semisolid dosage forms, including projects focused on semisolid dosage form
raw material identification testing using measurement and assessment. DPT is
near infrared (NIR); assay and homogeneity working on some research that is funded
evaluation; and particle-size measurement by FDA under the Generic Drug User Fee
or performance testing during milling of dry Amendment of 2012 (GDUFA). FDA is also
powders or in suspension. funding research by Michael Roberts and
Currently, he says, these testing approach-
his team in Queensland, Australia, that aims
es are usually best-suited for dedicated
to identify and define CQAs and potential
product equipment, where they can target
failure modes for semisolid products. FDA
specific CQAs required for a particular prod-
uct. As PAT system designs become more wants to relate CQAs of drug products to
modular, he says, they will likely become in-vitro and in-vivo performance.
standard for many areas within a manufac- Research will examine the properties
turing process. While not quite the same of APIs, excipients, and the interaction of
approach, similar techniques can also be ap- product with the skin. The team will compare
plied to characterize performance attributes bioavailability, and use tools such as atomic
during formulation development, he says. force microscopy, confocal Raman, and multi-
Examples would be dissolution rates and photon microscopy to study the effects of
concentrations, where solubility-dependent excipients and formulation in-vitro and in-vivo.
absorption is being improved through formu-
lation development. This would allow more Agnes Shanley is the senior editor
rapid product development, he says, and of Pharmaceutical Technology.
improve the potential for success through
increased in-vitro screening. References
USP plans to launch a collaborative 1. S. Raney, “Considerations Relating to Product
study that will involve equipment vendors, Quality Characterization for Topical Semisolid
contract laboratories, and pharmaceutical Dosage Forms,” presentation at the AAPS Annual
Meeting (Orlando, FL, October 2015).
companies that have expertise on the per-
formance tests for semisolid dosage forms. 2. M. Lowenborg, “Effect of Process Development
The goal is to gain a better understanding of on Emulsion Microstructure,” presentation at the
AAPS Annual Meeting (Orlando, FL, October 2015).
possible sources of variability when running
these tests, and to better describe the test 3. V. Shah et al., Topical Drug Bioavailability, Bio-
equivalence and Penetration, Second Edition, p.
conditions in the USP General Chapter 1724, 65, (Springer, January 2015).
Semisolid Drug Products—Performance
4. FDA, Guidance for Industry SUPACSS: Nonsterile
Tests (4), says Margareth R. C. Marques, Semisolid Dosage Forms (Rockville, MD, May 1997).
principal scientific liaison, US Pharmacopeial
Convention’s Science Division, Chemical This article first appeared in Pharmaceutical
Medicines General Chapters. Technology 39 (12): 42–44 (2015).
7 M AY 20 1 8 | P H A R M T E C H
Semisolid Topical
Functional Excipient Formulation
Formulation Trends for
Dosage Formulation
Forms Trends
Excipients Selection Development Topical Dosage Forms
S P ONS OR E D C ONTE NT
Formulation
Trends for Topical
Dosage Forms
Topical dosage forms include
a range of skin delivery
systems with unique advantages
and formulation challenges.
S
kin is the largest organ of the hu- with advantages and disadvantages, and
man body. The primary functions specific formulation challenges. A suf-
of skin are to act as a barrier to ficiently broad excipient portfolio allows
external pathogens, toxins and flexibility and freedom in formulating.
pollutants and to act as a barrier to retain The overall global market size for topi-
water in the body. Due to cal formulations was just
its design and function, the under $95 billion in 2016,
skin offers both opportunity The overall global and is expected to grow to
and challenges to the topi- over $122 billion in the next
cal delivery of therapeutics. market size for five years, with ointments
Depending on the indication topical formulations and gels making some-
and the drug, the formulator what more rapid gains
of a topical product may was just under than other dosage forms
wish to accomplish one or $95 billion in 2016. in certain global regions,
more of the following: (1) said Amy Ethier, a scientist
Deliver drug only to the skin in the Global Skin Delivery
surface, (2) deliver drug into the skin layers Lab at BASF Pharma Solu-
and/or (3) deliver drug through the skin for tions, during a presentation delivered at
systemic activity. CPhI North America 2017.
More than 40 distinct skin delivery dos- Ethier pointed out that some drivers in
age forms are listed in the FDA’s NDC the growth of the topical formulation mar-
(National Drug Code) Directory. Some of ket include generics expansion in emerging
the most common are creams, ointments, markets. Population shifts toward older
gels, and liquids. Some other notable forms consumers leading to a greater incidence
are foams, solid sticks, balms, sprays, and of diabetes related needs (wound care) as
patches. Each topical dosage form comes well as more emphasis on home care.
9 M AY 2 0 1 8 | P H A R M T E C H SPON SO R ED CO N TEN T
Semisolid Topical
Functional Excipient Formulation
Formulation Trends for
Dosage Formulation
Forms Trends
Excipients Selection Development Topical Dosage Forms
10 M AY 2 0 1 8 | P H A R M T E C H SPON SO R ED CO N TEN T
Semisolid Topical
Functional Excipient Formulation
Formulation Trends for
Dosage Formulation
Forms Trends
Excipients Selection Development Topical Dosage Forms
as a semisolid dosage emulsion form con- unstable because they are not at a ther-
taining more than 20% water and volatiles modynamic minimum energy. Effective
and less than 40% hydrocarbons, waxes, or formulation, through the careful selection
polyols, Ethier explained. of excipients, allows for the slowing of for-
One advantage of emulsions is the soft, mulation instability, and thus extends the
spreadable consistency that encourages life of the product.
high patient compliance, she noted. In “Emulsions or creams are complex
addition, the water and oil phases of the systems. That gives us an opportunity to
emulsion allow for maximization of active tailor the formulation to achieve the desired
pharmaceutical ingredient (API) solubility. properties, but it also means there are a
On the other hand, formulations for creams lot of interactions that are occurring at the
and lotions can be complicated. First, skin macroscopic scale, the microscopic scale,
type and environmental conditions present through various chemistries” said Ethier in a
variables that can influence many aspects of discussion with Pharmaceutical Technology.
delivery with creams or lotions. For example, The interplay between the excipients, the
compromised skin and humid conditions vehicle, and the active ingredient ultimately
could affect the performance properties of influence the thermal and rheological be-
the product, Ethier explained. havior of the product. Figure 1 shows the
Creams and lotions are relatively components of a model cream formula-
Example of a Cream Formulation
n Formulation
FIGURE components are dependent
1: Example on application
of a Cream Foundation site, API and targeted dermal delivery and
sensory properties.
11 M AY 2 0 1 8 | P H A R M T E C H SPON SO R ED CO N TEN T
Semisolid Topical
Functional Excipient Formulation
Formulation Trends for
Dosage Formulation
Forms Trends
Excipients Selection Development Topical Dosage Forms
12 M AY 2 0 1 8 | P H A R M T E C H SPON SO R ED CO N TEN T
Semisolid Topical
Functional Excipient Formulation
Formulation Trends for
Dosage Formulation
Forms Trends
Excipients Selection Development Topical Dosage Forms
Example of a Cream Formulation
n Formulation components are dependent on application site, API and targeted dermal delivery and
Thesensory
marketproperties.
for gels is highly dependent A disadvantage in marketing gels is that
on region (see Figure 2). In 2016, gels consumers don’t always associate gels
Wt%
occupied a significant Item Description Purpose
with efficacy. Creams
market share in North
Kollisolv ® PG Propylene glycol and ointments are
Solvent 5%
The market for gels is
America. Growth is
Kollicream ® OA Oleyl alcohol more visible 5%
Emollient and heavi-
Kollicream® ODhighly dependent
projected in all regions on
Octyldodecanol erEmollient
and those5% sensory
through 2021, butKolliphor® CS 20region. Gels are
Polyoxyl well- ether cues
20 cetostearyl signal efficacy
Emulsifier 3% for
growth will be greater many consumers.
Consistency
9%
Kolliwax® CSA 50
in North America and suited to hot, humid
Cetostearyl alcohol 50
Infactor
terms of formula-
1%
the Asia-Pacific API
region climates.
-
tion,API
gels may offer
72%
than Europe andWater
the - Solvent
less flexibility in solu-
rest of the world, said
Preservative - Preservative drop
bilizing the API, due
Ethier. to the general lack of an oil phase. Gels
One factor influencing regional varia- often contain alcohol, which can aid in
tions is climate. Gels are lighter formula- penetration, but also may have a drying
tions well-suited to hot, humid climates. effect on the skin.
13 M AY 2 0 1 8 | P H A R M T E C H SPON SO R ED CO N TEN T
Semisolid Topical
Functional Excipient Formulation
Formulation Trends for
Dosage Formulation
Forms Trends
Excipients Selection Development Topical Dosage Forms
n Kolliphor® P 188 and Kolliphor ® P 407 are mild, thermoreversible gelling agents that do not
require pH adjustment.
API - API 5%
14 M AY 2 0 1 8 | P H A R M T E C H SPON SO R ED CO N TEN T
Semisolid Topical
Functional Excipient Formulation
Formulation Trends for
Dosage Formulation
Forms Trends
Excipients Selection Development Topical Dosage Forms
The definition
FIGUREof a medicated
4: Foamingfoam is ‘an emulsion
Technology Usingcontaining one or more active ingredients,
Aerosol Foams
surfactants, aqueous or non-aqueous liquids and propellants.
Air bubble
Skin surface
Solvent /
Surface
emollient
active agent
15 M AY 2 0 1 8 | P H A R M T E C H SPON SO R ED CO N TEN T
Semisolid Topical
Functional Excipient Formulation
Formulation Trends for
Dosage Formulation
Forms Trends
Excipients Selection Development Topical Dosage Forms
Sticks and Patches you can really start to feel that when you’re
A stick is a solid dosage form applied by applying the stick to the skin,” said Ethier.
rubbing on the skin. It typically provides A patch is a drug delivery system that
an occlusive barrier. Sticks are a simple usually includes an adhesive backing. It is
formulation generally not intended for applied to an external site on the body, and
large areas of skin. the ingredients either passively diffuse from
A very simple example of a stick formula- the patch, or are actively transported into
tion (see Figure 5) combines a fatty alcohol the skin. The intended target tissue may be
(Kolliwax® CSA the skin, a location
50/cetostearyl under the skin, or
alcohol 50) with A broad range of excipients general circulation
an emollient in the body. Extend-
(Kollicream® OD/ offers options for developing ed release films are
octyldodecanol) a variety of dosage forms to a common type of
and active ingredi- meet many formulation needs. patch dosage form.
ent. The stick can Patches can be
be adjusted for single-layer or
consistency and multi-layer. In a
properties of the oil, as desired. “We have single-layer patch, the drug and adhesive are
some oils that are very fast-spreading and sandwiched between the backing and the
liner. The backing layer protects the API and
n A stick is defined as a dosage form prepared in a relatively long and slender, often cylindrical form.
16 M AY 2 0 1 8 | P H A R M T E C H SPON SO R ED CO N TEN T
Semisolid Topical
Functional Excipient Formulation
Formulation Trends for
Dosage Formulation
Forms Trends
Excipients Selection Development Topical Dosage Forms
excipients from evaporation and anchors the However, patches can sometimes be diffi-
formulation. The drug/adhesive layer adheres cult to remove from the skin or inconvenient
to the skin and holds the API. The liner layer to dispose of. Some active ingredients and
protects the formulation during storage and indications require a larger surface area.
is removed prior to application.
In a multi-layer formulation, layers of drug Conclusion
and adhesive are separated by a membrane The broad range of dosage forms available,
that reinforces the system and mediates including, but not limited to, lotions, creams,
sustained release. The lower drug layer con- ointments, gels, foams, sprays, sticks, and
tacts the skin initially and provides an initial
patches, have the potential to deliver many
burst of drug upon contact with skin. The up-
active ingredients on and through the skin.
per drug and adhesive layer contributes to an
Choices for skin delivery dosage forms de-
enhanced API release rate (see Figure 6).
pend on the indication or disease, the state
Patches are typically very adaptable for
the type of delivery desired. For example, of the skin, and patient compliance. A broad
they can be tailored for immediate release or range of excipients offers options for de-
extended release. The profile of the product veloping a variety of dosage forms to meet
is inconspicuous and discrete. many formulation needs.
17 M AY 2 0 1 8 | P H A R M T E C H SPON SO R ED CO N TEN T
Excipient Selection to
Semisolid
Dosage
Topical
Formulation
Functional Excipient Formulation Enable the Performance of
Forms Trends
Excipients Selection Development
Skin Delivery Dosage Forms
S P ONS OR E D C ONTE NT
Excipient Selection to
Enable the Performance of
Skin Delivery Dosage Forms
Semisolids like ointments, gels, and creams
benefit from functional ingredients that improve
product performance and ensure delivery.
Norman Richardson and Amy Ethier
T
he global topical drug deliv- layers and make it to the correct biological
ery market was valued at compartment for activity. Third, once the
$92.4 billion in 2016, and API and excipients penetrate the stratum
is projected to expand at a corneum, formulators must ensure the
compound aggregate growth ingredients are mild and do not trigger
rate of 6.4% between 2016 and 2021 (1). inflammatory responses in the living cells.
Topical drug formulators have a large Finally, formulators must ensure the ac-
playing field of dosage form options such tives are delivered to the correct compart-
as ointments, creams, lotions, gels, trans- ment for efficacy and take effect in an
dermal patches, wipes, swabs, sprays, appropriate time period (see Figure 1).
and foams. Indeed, the US Food and Drug Topical drug developers are increasingly
Administration’s National Drug Code Direc- seeking novel or different dosage forms
tory includes more than 40 different types for a variety of reasons including:
of topical dosage forms. • Improved or safer drug
When deciding on the product design delivery routes;
and selecting an appropriate dosage form,
topical drug formulators consider many • Protection and stabilization
of sensitive reactive APIs;
challenges with regard to delivery method.
First is the need to apply drug product in • Increased solubilization
a clean, effective, and targeted way to of insoluble APIs;
the surface of the skin. Then, once the • Improvement of sensory
product is applied, active ingredients must properties, applicability
cross the stratum corneum into the living and patient acceptance;
19 M AY 2 0 1 8 | P H A R M T E C H SPON SO R ED CO N TEN T
Excipient Selection to
Semisolid
Dosage
Topical
Formulation
Functional Excipient Formulation Enable the Performance of
Forms Trends
Excipients Selection Development
Skin Delivery Dosage Forms
• Extension of the API and lotions, for instance, one could use wax
exclusivity or patent life; materials (e.g., cetyl alcohol, cetostearyl
• Cost savings; and alcohol or stearic acid) or polymers (e.g.,
Poloxamer 188, 407, and PVP K90) to achieve
• Replication of reference
the desired product consistency.
listed drugs.
Fluidity. Products must have the ability
Semisolid Attributes Are Driven to flow and spread onto the surface of the
by Functional Excipients skin. To achieve optimal fluidity, hydrophilic
While many attributes can be designed into a solvents such as propylene glycol, PEG 300,
topical drug, the following five characteristics PEG 400 and triacetin or hydrophobic materi-
can be improved with functional excipients. als (e.g., medium-chain triglycerides, oleyl
Solidity. Topical semi-solid products have a alcohol, and octyldodecanol) can be helpful.
certain degree of solidity or stiffness, which Physical stability. Topical products must
is often described as the elastic component remain consistent and stable throughout
of their viscoelastic nature. Formulators their shelf life. Physical stability requires
manage the stiffness or solidity of a semi- amphiphilic materials. Commonly used func-
solid formulation by the use of consistency tional excipients for emulsification include
EXCIPIENT are
factors. Higher melting point materials nonionics
SELECTION TO ENABLE such as Polyoxyl
THE PERFORMANCE 20 cetostearyl
OF SKIN DELIVERY DOSAGE FORMS
usually selected for this purpose. For creams ether, polysorbates, and poloxamers. Anion-
Major Concerns of Topical Drug
Major Concerns of Topical Drug
Formulators
Formulators
Figure 1: Major concerns of topical drug formulators.
to penetrate
Stratum corneum is
difficult to penetrate
Need mild ingredients to prevent
Irritation of living cells
Need mild ingredients
to prevent irritation of
living cells
Deliver drug to appropriate location
Deliver drug to
appropriate
location
ics such as sodium lauryl sulfate and sodium (e.g., emulsifying waxes), and water-soluble
cetostearyl sulfate are also available and are bases (e.g., polyethylene glycols).
usually used at somewhat lower concentra- Advantages of the ointment dosage form
tions because they tend to cause irritation at include good physical stability, a barrier to
higher concentrations. bacteria, a low risk of phase separation, and
Drug delivery. As topical products are the need for fewer excipients, which can
released on or through the skin, drugs must lead to lower materials costs and simpler
perform as expected. A key consideration manufacturing processes.
is how to accelerate penetration through Mupirocin Ointment 2% USP is one ex-
the stratum corneum. For hydrophilic drugs, ample of a marketed ointment. It contains
propylene glycol or triacetin could be con- only three ingredients: mupirocin, polyeth-
sidered; for a hydrophobic drug, enhancers ylene glycol 400, and polyethylene glycol
such as oleyl alcohol or isopropyl myristate 3350. Polyethylene glycol 3350 has a higher
are options. It is important to note that melting point, so it tends to crystallize or
there is no single material that will be a mix with the polyethylene glycol 400 to form
penetration enhancer for all APIs. The choice rigid phases that build a consistency in the
of penetration enhancer is driven by the formulation. The polyethylene glycol is the
physical-chemical nature of the API and by fluid component that behaves like a solvent
the desired route or mechanism for acceler- and allows for spreadability.
ating penetration. To explore the impact of PEG 3350 on
Emolliency. This is driven by excipients microstructure and rheology, a series of
that soften the skin and provide a barrier placebo ointments, sans the active, contain-
that holds moisture for hydration (e.g., iso- ing a range of PEG 3350 concentrations
propyl myristate, and cocoyl caprylocaprate). were evaluated. Microscopy demonstrated
Ointment Dosage Form
The choice of excipients affects the micro-
structural arrangement, which in turn affects VISUALIZATION OF SPONSORED
CONTENT
than 20% water and volatiles and more than Transform Infrared Imaging (ATR-FTIR Imaging) and Confocal Raman Spectroscopy
.2
5 µm
Absorbance (AU)
.15
10 µm
or mucous membrane.
.1
15 µm
.05
20 µm
METHODS 0 25 µm
ATR-FTIR Imaging Spectroscopy ATR-FTIR spectra of human untreated skin (Black), skin treated with Kollicream® OD (Blue),
Single Beam / Microns
Res=None
Wavenumber (cm-1)
difference spectrum of treated and untreated skin (red) and neat Kollicream® OD (grey) Raman spectra of human skin (black) and Kollicream® OD (red) 35 µm
In this work, ATR-FTIR imaging spectroscopy is employed to visualize and It was necessary to first establish an approximate depth to which Kollicream® OD
measure the penetration of Kollicream® OD (octyldodecanol) inside the SC and penetrates prior to completing more advanced spectroscopic techniques (Raman The penetration of Kollicream® OD extends beyond the stratum corneum and
evaluate the active penetration enhancement potential of this product for the spectroscopy). The confirmation of Kollicream® OD penetration may be observed from into the epidermis as shown by the Raman spectrum above. The vertical blocks
prospective delivery of actives into the SC in ex-vivo human skin. A comparison the FTIR-ATR spectroscopic imaging results below. It is clear from the scans of the tape indicate Kollicream ® OD concentrations at increasing depth into the epidermis
and visualization of Kollicream® OD deposition and penetration into the human stripped layers of ex-vivo human skin that the Kollicream® OD penetration has reached, and horizontal blocks differentiate multiple data collections.
skin was achieved by measuring levels of the excipient at the skin surface and in to a degree, up to layer 8 of the stratum corneum.
subsequent layers using ATR-FTIR imaging. Hyperspectral images were collected 2920 to Am1 area peak ratio 1465 to Am1 area peak ratio 1040 to Am1 area peak ratio Lipid Bilayer Organization
for each skin sample at the skin surface before treatment (control), on the skin
21 M AY 2 0 1 8 | P H A R M T E C H SPON SO R ED CO N TEN T
Excipient Selection to
EXCIPIENT SELECTION
SELECTION TO
TO ENABLE THE
THEPERFORMANCE OF
OFSKIN
SKINDELIVERY DOSAGE
DOSAGEFORMS
Semisolid EXCIPIENT
Dosage
Topical
Formulation
ENABLE
Functional PERFORMANCE
Excipient DELIVERY
Formulation FORMS Enable the Performance of
Forms Trends
Excipients Selection Development
Skin Delivery Dosage Forms
ointment. It contains only three ingredients: mupirocin, polyeth- was studied and it was determined that by changing the
ointment. It contains only three ingredients: mupirocin, polyeth- was studied and it was determined that by changing the
ylene glycol 400, and polyethylene glycol 3350. Polyethylene amount of PEG 3350 in the formula, shear viscosity can be
ylene glycol 400, and polyethylene glycol 3350. Polyethylene amount of PEG 3350 in the formula, shear viscosity can be
glycol 3350 has a higher melting point, so it tends to crystallize tuned to a desirable level. (Figure 3).
that
glycolas 3350
or mix with thetheamount
has a higher melting
polyethylene ofglycol
PEG 3350
point,
400 decreased,
so it tends
to form
to crystallize tuned
rigid phases determined
In
to a desirable
this example, thethat by(Figure
level. changing
ointments
3). the amount of
were sheared from a rate of
or mix with the polyethylene glycol 400 to form rigid phases In this example, the ointments were sheared from a rate of
crystallinity
that build a consistencydecreased, which
in the formulation. in turn
The affected
polyethylene PEG
0.01 3350
reciprocal in
secondthe formula,
to 1,000
that build a consistency in the formulation. The polyethylene 0.01 reciprocal second to 1,000 reciprocal seconds. The data shear
reciprocal viscosity
seconds. The datacan
glycol is the fluid component that behaves like a solvent and collected showed that viscosity increases systematically with
the
glycolperformance
is the fluid component of thethat formulation.
behaves like aAt lower
solvent be tuned
and collected to athat
showed desirable level (Figure
viscosity increases 3). with
systematically
allows for spreadability. the amount of PEG 3350 in the formulation.
concentrations
allows for spreadability. of PEG 3350,
To explore the impact of PEG 3350 on microstructure and weeping oc- the amount of PEG 3350 in the formulation.
This Intells
thisus example,
that formulatorsthecanointments were prop-
tune the rheological
To explore the impact of PEG 3350 on microstructure and This tells us that formulators can tune the rheological prop-
curred
rheology, (Figure 2). The critical point at which
a series of placebo ointments,
rheology, a series of placebo ointments, sans the active, erties
sans the active, erties by
sheared selecting the
fromthe
by selecting
correct
a rate amount
ofamount
correct
of the
0.01 sof to
-1 higher
the 1,000
melting
s-1.
higher melting
containing a range of PEG 3350
the PEGa3350 crystals Effect of [PEG 3350] on Ointment
containing range of PEG 3350 Effect
Figure ofof[PEG
2: Effect [PEG 3350]3350] on Ointment
on ointment weeping.
concentrations were evaluated. Weeping
Figure 2: Effect of [PEG 3350] on ointment weeping.
packed
M i c ro s c otogether
concentrations py d e m o nand
were evaluated.
s tr a te d Weeping
M i c ro s c o py d e m o n s tr a te d
the
that PEG
that
as the400 amountfluidof filled
PEG Mupirocin Ointment 2% USP
3350 as the amount
decreased, of PEG
crystallinity Mupirocin Ointment 2% USP
the
3350 interspaces
d e c r edecreased,
be-
a s e d, w h i ccrystallinity
h in turn Ingredient UNII Function
Ingredient UNII Function
tween
d e c r e a s the
e d, crystals,
w h
affected the performance of thei c h i n so
t u r n Mupirocin D0GX863OA5 Active
affected the Atperformance of the Mupirocin D0GX863OA5 Active
that excess
formulation.
formulation. At
fluidconcentra-
lower
lower
does
concentra-
Polyethylene glycol 400 B697894SGQ Solvent, fluid
tions of PEG 3350, weeping Polyethylene glycol 400 B697894SGQ Solvent, fluid
Polyethylene glycol 3350 G2M7P15E5P Consistency factor
not
tions
occurred
leak
of PEG out3350,
(Figure of2).the The
oint-
weeping
critical Polyethylene glycol 3350 G2M7P15E5P Consistency factor
ment,
point at was
occurred (Figure
which 25–30%
the2). PEG
The critical
3350
Placebo ointments (BASF Skin Delivery Lab)
point
crystals at packed
which the PEG 3350
together and
PEG
crystals
3350.packed
Placebo ointments (BASF Skin Delivery Lab)
the PEG 400 fluid together
filled the inter-and
theAdditionally,
spacesPEG between
400 fluid filled the the inter-
the crystals,
rheology of the various
spaces
so that between
excess fluidthe crystals,
does not
so that excess fluid
leak out of the ointment, was does not
placebo ointments
Effect of [PEG3350] on Ointment
[PEG 3350] 35% 30% 25% 20% 10%
leak out of
25–30% PEG 3350. the ointment, was
was studied and it wasof
Effect of [PEG3350] on Ointment
[PEG 3350]
Weeping No 35% 30%
No 25%
Yes Yes20% 10%
Yes
25–30% PEG 3350.
Additionally, the rheology
Rheology
theAdditionally,
various placebo the rheology
ointments of Weeping No No Yes Yes Yes 11
Rheology
the various placebo ointments
Figure 3: Effect of [PEG3350] on ointment rheology.
11
5% PEG
10% PEG3350
3350 1.0E+03
(Pa
5% PEG 3350
Viscosity
1.0E+02
Viscosity
1.0E+02
1.0E+01
1.0E+01
1.0E+00
1.0E+00
1.0E-01
1.0E-02 1.0E-01 1.0E+00 1.0E+01 1.0E+02 1.0E+03
1.0E-01
1.0E-02 1.0E-01 1.0E+00 1.0E+01 1.0E+02 1.0E+03
Shear rate (s-1)
Shear rate (s-1) 12
12
22 M AY 2 0 1 8 | P H A R M T E C H SPON SO R ED CO N TEN T
Excipient Selection to
EXCIPIENT SELECTION TO ENABLE THE PERFORMANCE OF SKIN DELIVERY DOSAGE FORMS
EXCIPIENT SELECTION TO ENABLE THE PERFORMANCE OF SKIN DE
Semisolid
Dosage
Topical
Formulation
Functional Excipient Formulation Enable the Performance of
Forms Trends
Excipients Selection Development
Skin Delivery Dosage Forms
point material. This technique can also be applied to creams most crystallinity and the lowest rate of diffusion through the
in which waxes are used. By changing pointthe material. This technique
concentration can also be
of membrane. The applied to creams
propylene most crystallinity
glycol formulation and and
was higher, the lowest rate o
wax, viscosity can be tuned. in which waxes are used. Bythe Poloxamer 124 had the highest rate of flux. Thus, there is glycol form
changing the concentration of membrane. The propylene
wax, viscosity can be tuned.
Also in these studies, solvent in the ointment was changed apparently a correlation between the theselection
Poloxamer 124 had the highest rat
of solvent,
The data collected showed that Alsoviscosity
in these studies, solvent Poloxamer 124
in the ointment washas solubilized
changed more
apparently of the itsbetween the
a correlation
to create three formulations, each containing 30% of a solvent impact on the micro-structure, and the diffusion through the
increases
and 2% mupirocinsystematically
(Figure 4). Thewith theimage
to create
middle amount showsofless stratum
three formulations, PEG.
each The other
containing
membrane.
30% oftwo images
a solvent show
impact more
on the crys-
micro-structure, and th
and 2% mupirocin (Figure 4).talline The middle image
structures. shows less stratum membrane.
PEG 3350indicating
crystallinity, in the formulation.
that solvent Poloxamer 124 has solu-
crystallinity, indicating that solvent Poloxamer 124 has solu-
bilized
Thismore
tellsofus thethat
PEG formulators
and the API. The other images Creams Are
two the Complex Heterogeneous onSystems
bilizedcan moretuneof the PEG and theWhat API. The effect
other does this have
two images Creams drug deliv- Heterogeneo
Are Complex
show more crystalline structures. Cream formulations are complex, two-phase systems that
rheological properties by selecting show more the cor- structures.
crystalline ery? A drug diffusion studyCream
What effect does this have on drug delivery? A drug diffusion center on effectively solubilizing and delivering an active
usingformulations
Franz cells are complex, tw
rect What effect does this have on drug delivery? A drug diffusion center on effectively solubilizing an
study amount
using Franzof the
cells withhigher
a modelmelting
skin membrane pointcompared
ma- with a while
ingredient model skin kinetics
balancing membrane compareddriving
with thermodynamic
study using Franz cells with a model skin membrane compared ingredient while balancing kinetics with
terial.
the threeThis technique
ointments (Figure 5)can
. Thealso beformulation
triacetin applied had to(Figure the three
the forces. ointments
This contributes (Figure
to the 5). The
complexities and triacetin
the impor-
Effect
creams
of
in which
Solventwaxes
Selection on
the three ointments Ointment 5). The triacetin formulation had the forces. This contributes to the comp
Effect of Solvent Selection on Ointment tance of understanding the role
tance of
Drug
Figure Solubilization
4: Effect
are used. By changing
of solvent selection on ointment drug solubilization.
Drug Solubilization
Figure 4: Effect of solvent selection on ointment drug
of excipients as the key driver to
solubilization. of excipie
deliver the active ingredient.
! 2% Mupirocin ointments wih different solvents at 30% deliver th
the concentration of ! 2% Mupirocin ointments wih different solvents at 30% To b e t te r u n d e r s t a n d a
40x 40x 40x To b e
wax, viscosity can be 40x 40x cream’s
40x consistency, consider
cream’s
the emulsification, the solubi-
tuned. lization, and structure building
the emu
100x 100x 100x lization, a
Also in these studies, 100x 100x 100x
components. A simple cream
compone
solvent in the ointment formulation may include a fatty
formulati
400x alcohol, an emulsifier, and water.
was changed to create 400x 400x 400x
400x 400x changes to these alcohol, a
Systematic
three formulations, Systema
components provide a better
compon
each containing 30% understanding about the effect
understa
of a solvent (Figure 4). of excipient selection on the
of excipi
performance properties. These
The middle 30% image
PG 30% P124 30% GTA
properties are influenced by the
performa
30% PG 30% P124 30% GTA
propertie
shows less40%crystallinity,
PEG 400 40% PEG 400
40% PEG 400
40% PEG 400
40% PEG 400
selection of excipients,
40% PEG 400
quantity,
selection
indicating that solvent
30% PEG 3350 30% PEG 3350
30% PEG 3350
30% PEG 3350
30% PEG 3350
and the processing. Additionally,
30% PEG 3350 and the p
Kollisolv® PG = Propylene glycol Kollisolv® P124 = Poloxamer 124 Kollisolv® GTA = Triacetin changes can be visualized and changes
Kollisolv® PG = Propylene glycol Kollisolv® P124 = Poloxamer 124 Kollisolv® GTA = Triacetin
quantified in terms of differences quantified
, &&1&'
, &&1&'
+ &&1&'
+ &&1&'
PG
* &&1&'
* &&1&'
) &&1&'
) &&1&'
( &&1&' ( &&1&'
P124
' &&1&' ' &&1&'
23 M AY 2 0 1 8 | P H A R M T E C H SPON SO R ED CO N TEN T
Excipient Selection to
Semisolid
Dosage
Topical
Formulation
Functional Excipient Formulation Enable the Performance of
Forms Trends
Excipients Selection Development
Skin Delivery Dosage Forms
formulation had the most crystallinity and quantity, and the processing. Additionally,
the lowest rate of diffusion through the changes can be visualized and quantified
membrane. The propylene glycol formula- in terms of differences in viscosity or
tion was higher, and the Poloxamer 124 rheological profile when the composition
had the highest rate of flux. Thus, there of the formulation is modified.
is apparently a correlation between the Dermal drug delivery studies, in an in
selection of solvent, its impact on the vitro model system, were conducted with
micro-structure, and the diffusion through Clotrimazole cream formulations that dif-
the stratum membrane. fered only in the lipophilic fluids that were
used (e.g., mineral oil, isopropyl myristate,
Creams Are Complex cocoyl caprylocaprate or octyldodecanol).
Heterogeneous Systems Effects were evaluated based on each
Cream formulations are complex, two- component individually and their interac-
phase systems that center on effec- tive contributions (Figure 6). The top left is
tively solubilizing and delivering an ac- an example of the release of Clotrimazole
tive ingredient from the formula-
while balancing Creams formulations are com- tion and penetration
kinetics with across a model
thermodynamic
plex, two-phase systems that membrane by indi-
driving forces. center on effectively solubilizing vidually changing
This contributes and delivering an active ingredi- the oil phase in the
to the com- particular formula-
plexities and the ent while balancing kinetics with tion. This modifi-
importance of thermodynamic driving forces. cation had a sig-
understanding nificant effect on the
the role of ex- Clotrimazole release
cipients as the key driver to deliver the and penetration across the membrane. In
active ingredient. this case, isopropyl myristate increased
To better understand a cream’s con- penetration of clotrimazole across the
sistency, consider the emulsification, membrane most significantly.
the solubilization, and structure-building The bottom left illustrates how fatty
components. A simple cream formula- alcohol content was systematically modi-
tion may include a fatty alcohol, an fied to understand the structuring effect
emulsifier, and water. Systematic and resulting influence on the viscosity or
changes to these components provide a rheological profile. It becomes clear that
better understanding about the effect of formulations containing stearyl alcohol
excipient selection on the performance have a lower viscosity than those contain-
properties. These properties are influ- ing cetyl alcohol or cetostearyl alcohol.
enced by the selection of excipients, This is critical because it not only affects
24 M AY 2 0 1 8 | P H A R M T E C H SPON SO R ED CO N TEN T
Excipient Selection to
Semisolid
Dosage
Topical
Formulation
Functional Excipient Formulation Enable the Performance of
Forms Trends
Excipients Selection Development
Skin Delivery Dosage Forms
400x,
brightfield
400x, xpol
cream formulation
400x,
xpol
5-component
400x,
ents, but understanding the functionality product perform
of these ingredients can help tune formu- Reference
An Executive
xpol
1. Topical Drug Delivery Market- Global
the Performance of S
lation properties.
Delivery Dosage For
5-component
29
SPONSORED BY
26 M AY 2 0 1 8 | P H A R M T E C H SPON SO R ED CO N TEN T
Case Studies: Excipient
Semisolid
Dosage
Topical
Formulation
Functional Excipient Formulation Selection for Topical
Forms Trends
Excipients Selection Development
Formulations
S P ONS OR E D C ONTE NT
Case Studies:
Excipient Selection
for Topical
Formulations
T
opical drug products are a grow- livery, physical and chemical stability, as well
ing category, but the formula- as other attributes. Given the critical role that
tion of products like creams, excipients play, it is of utmost importance
ointments, and foams can be that formulators consider the many opportu-
extremely complex. Semi-solids often contain nities excipients have for modifying product
many components (or excipients) that inter- functionality and critical quality attributes.
act with each other and affect the functional The following case studies illustrate the many
Foam Formulations
properties of the end-product, including drug ways formulators can use excipients as tools
delivery onto and/or through the skin, mild- to improve drug products.
ness, aesthetic properties, and physical and
03_170701e-00
Focusing on your needs with platform solutions.
lations they organize in specific ways to yield and in some cases are preferred by panel-
Instant &certain
Modified microstructures.
Release | Solubilization These microstruc-
| Skin Delivery ists over creams. Foams provide ease of
| Softgels | Biologic Solutions
tures include phases and states of matter application, pleasing sensory properties,
that arise from the blending together of simplicity and effective drug delivery.
lipophilic material, emulsifiers, oils, solvents, Examples of topical pharmaceutical
Topical polymers,
foams are growing in popularity, and
water and APIs. It is becoming in some cases preferred by panelists over a cream.
foams include:
Foams provide ease of application, pleasing sensory properties, simplicity and effective drug delivery.
increasingly recognized
that these states of
Examples of topical pharmaceutical foams
include:
matter that comprise Gas
SE SE
Forms Trends
trademark
trademark of BASF
of BASF
03_170701e-00
® = registered
platform solutions.
• Evoclin® for acne treatment (dynamic of varying ingredients (with and without
03_170701e-00
® = registered
platform solutions.
foam, contains alcohol)
ubilization | Skin Delivery | Softgels | Biologic Solutions Kolliphor® P188 and Kolliphor® CS 12 vs. CS
ubilization | Skin Delivery | Softgels | Biologic Solutions
• Olux-E® for psoriasis and atopic dermati- 20) on the foam properties (consistency, vis-
cosity and spreadability) were investigated.
tis (incorporation of occlusive agents)
R E S U LT S
• Epifoam
in popularity, for minor pain, itching and dis-
® cases preferred by panelists over a cream.
and in some
in popularity,
plication, and in
pleasing some properties,
sensory cases preferred by panelists
simplicity over adrug
and effective All formulations produced excellent foams
cream.
delivery.
comfort (dual functionality)
that retain shape when dispensed on the
plication, pleasing sensory properties, simplicity and effective drug delivery.
ical foams The Use of Excipients skin, spread easily over the desired area
ical foams
in Foam Formulations and dry quickly. Stiffness (G’) and viscosity
Gas
Gas
Gas
dermatitis
Gas
ical measurements
Surface active agent
Solvent/Emollient
and summarized in the
The foaming capability and properties of Air
Gas Gas
ts)
dermatitis Gas
figure and tableAir below. Rheological analysis
Surface active agent
Gas
and
were evaluated. FormulationsAir consisted tailored
Gas
(dispersed phase) & Emulsion (continous phase) by the choice of foaming agents.
Gas
of all BASF pharma excipients. The effects Using Kolliphor® CS 12 as the foaming
Air (dispersed phase) & Emulsion (continous phase)
Formulation G’ (Pa)
added® to
lliphor CS A 13.9 (@0.01
54.7 1/s) 1000
100 loxamers as Gelling
Viscosity
roperties,
added to
eological
B
A 130.6
13.9 428.9
54.7
100
Agents for Topical
Viscosity
roperties, C
B 189.8
130.6 113.8
428.9 10
ASF
eological
desired
ASF
D
C 173.8
189.8 756.6
113.8 10
1
Formulations
0.01 0.1 1 10 100
desired
D 173.8 756.6
1
0.01 0.1
Shear Rate (1/s)
1 10 100
Gelling agents are fre-
Summary of measured G’ and η for studied foam formulations. Rheological profiles of studied foam formulations (log-log plots).
Summary of measured G’ and η for studied foam formulations.
Shear Rate (1/s)
TheII rheology of
Kolliphor®the gel
P 407 formulations
Poloxamer 407was analyzed using
gelling agent oscillatory
15-20
Phase
measurements ω=1 mixed
II and III(were and γ=0.1%)
rad/s and maintained
w
Kolliphor
increased
®
P 188
at 1°C/minute. The gel temperature solvent
was determined for each Materials
until dissolved. The solution was
sample by evaluating G’ and G” valuesheated to
wt% III Kolliphor
rature
DI water
®
and recorded
Water
P 407 as a function of concentration (as shown
53-58
at left). added
To notewith slow
is the stirring in
increase to gelling
not incorporate
temperat
10 IV Kollicream® IPM Isopropyl myristate tack reducer 2 and
with Methods
slow stirring.
ethanol. A shear sweep of the gel (25 wt% poloxamer) at 32°C (shown below) demonstrates non-Newtonian b
10 Materials
Phase Component
and Methods
Chemical name Fuction wt%
Phase II and III were mixed
5
Results
Phase
45 II Ethanol
and III200
were mixed
proof and
Ethanol maintained at 2°C overnight
solvent or
10
and maintained
10000 at 2°C over-
15-20
IV was Materials and rad/sMethods
night or until dissolved. The
Gel Temperature (°C)
until
I dissolved.
40
Kollisolv The
PG solution was heated
Propylene glycol to 40°C
®
and Phase 10
solvent
53-58 The rheology
35 of the gel formulations was analyzed using oscillatory measurements
1000 ( ω=1 and γ=0.1%) while
added with slow stirring to not incorporate air. Phase I was added
Glycerol Glycerol solvent 5
solution was heated G’ to and
40°C
2 increased
30 at 1°C/minute. The gel temperature was determined for eachPhase sample by
II and evaluating
III were mixed andG” values as
maintained
with slow stirring.
Viscosity (Pa s)
II 25 Kolliphor P 407 Poloxamer 407 ®
gelling agent 15-20
rature and recorded as a function of concentration (as shown at left). To and
notePhase
is the IV was
increase added
in gelling
until dissolved. The solution was heated to
100 temperature
III 20 DIAwater
ethanol. shear sweep ofWater solvent
the gel (25 wt% poloxamer) 53-58
at 32°C (shownadded
below) demonstrates
15
with slow
with stirring
slow to non-Newtonian
stirring not beha
to not incorporate
IV Kollicream IPM
Gel formulation Isopropyl myristate ®
tack reducer 2 10
10
with slow stirring.
incorporate air. Phase I was
Kolliphor P 407 + Water ®
10000
545
scillatory measurements ( ω=1 rad/s and γ=0.1%) while the temperature was added with 1 slow stirring.
ned for eachResults
040
sample
350 by evaluating G’10and G” values as20a function 25 of tempe- 1000
Gel Temperature
5 15 30
wn at left). To note30is the increase in
The rheology
gelling
of the gelKolliphor
temperature
formulations
with the addition of
was analyzed using oscillatory measurements Results 0,1
0,01( ω=1 rad/s and γ=0.1%) while
Viscosity (Pa s)
®
P 407 Concentration 0,1 1 10
32°C (shown below) demonstrates non-Newtonian behavior of the formed gel. The rheology
25 100
of the gel
increased
20 at 1°C/minute. The gel temperature was determined for each sample by evaluating G’ and Shear
G” values
rate (s-1as
)
rature15and recorded
Formulation
10000 Gel as
formulation a function of concentration
Coefficient of (as
Friction shown at
400
left). formulations
To note is
10 the was
increaseanalyzed
in gelling temperature
10
ethanol.
With A shear
Kollicream IPM sweep
Kolliphor
® of the gel 0.38±0.00
P 407 + Water (25 wt% poloxamer) at 32°C (shownusing
® below)oscillatory
demonstrates non-Newtonian beha
measure-
5 350 1
1000
Without 0
Kollicream
45 0
®
IPM
5 10 15 20
0.71±0.07
25 300
30
ments10000
(ω=1 rad/s and
while the tempera-
Viscosity (Pa s)
Stress (Pa)
40
100 Kolliphor P 407 Concentration ® 250 γ=0.1%) 0,1
0,01 0,1 1 10
Although a suitable gel may be formed without the addition of 200
35
ture
a lipidic fluid, itwas
1000
has increased
been observedat 1°C/
(and measured u
Gel Temperature
Formulation
25 Coefficient of Friction 150 minute.100 The gel temperature
friction and perceived tackiness. 0.38±0.00
20
With Kollicream
151
IPM ® 100
was determined for each
Gel formulation 50 10
Without Kollicream IPM 0.71±0.07 sample by evaluating G’ and
®
30 10
0,1 Kolliphor P 407 + Water ®
0
G” values as a function of
5
0,01 0,1 1 10 100 1000 1
0
Although0 a suitable 5 gel may 10 be formed 15 without
Shear rate (s )
20 the addition
25 -1
of a 30lipidic fluid, it has been and
temperature observed (and measured
recorded as ® usin
accessory for the TA Instruments DHS-1 Rheometer with Vitro-Skin®) that the0,1addition of 1% Kollicream IPM 10 red
Kolliphor P 407 Concentration
a function of concentration
®
0,01 0,1 1
friction and perceived tackiness.
(as shown at left). To noteShear rate (s ) -1
Although a suitable gel may be formed without the addition of a lipidic fluid, it has been observed (and measured usin
29 M AYaccessory for
2018 | PHARM H TA Instruments DHS-1 Rheometer with Vitro-Skin®) that the addition SPON
T E Cthe of 1%
SO RKollicream
ED CO N TEN T ® IPM red
03_171101e
® = register
Case Studies: Excipient
| BiologicInstant
elsSemisolid & Modified Release | Solubilization | Skin Delivery | Softgels | Biologic Solutions
Solutions
Dosage
Topical
Formulation
Functional Excipient Formulation Selection for Topical
Forms Trends
Excipients Selection Development
Formulations
Kolliwax
Kolliwax
ffectivelythe
build HCO
HCO,
formulation
gel (25 wt% whenas aused
High
viscosity
poloxamer)
® ®
atMelting
and
at 32°C low levelsPoint
enhance
(shown may effectively
stability
reduces build formulation
ofthe coefficient of friction andviscosity
per- and en
Consistency
topical
use in semi-solid
below) Factor
formulations.
formulations
demonstrates for
the Topical
Aissignificant
highbehav-
non-Newtonian Applications
advantage
melting point,of and
ceived use in semi-solid formulations is the high
tackiness.
03_171101e-00
used at low various
levels on your needs across range of dosage forms. Generally used at low levels
Focusing
been andobserved
(0.1-2
or to (1) build wt.%), Kolliwax
with platform
(and measured
®
HCO mayusing
solutions.
the by the formulator
be utilized tor for Topical to (1) buildApplications
and
Instant & Modified Release | Solubilization | Skin Delivery | Softgels | Biologic Solutions ®
Tribo-Rheometry
stabilize
ase retention on viscosity accessory
due to a for
higher the TA
melting Instru-
point and (2) Kolliwax
increase HCO,
retention when
on used at low levels,
the
ments
ight and size skin, scalp or hair
and DHS-1 Rheometer with Vitro-Skin )surface through a higher
® molecular weight and size and
may effectively build formulation viscos-
hydrophobic chemistry.
that the addition of 1% Kollicream IPM ®
ity and enhance the stability of topical
Materials
Kolliwax® HCO, when andused Methods
at low levels may effectively build formulation viscosity and enhance stability of
formulations.
topical formulations. A significant advantage of use in semi-solid formulations is the high A melting
significantpoint, and
Phase Tradename Chemical Function % advantage of
efficient
% multi-phase consistency building.
I Di Water Water Solvent 72.6
t
72.6
In
5.0 topical Glycerin
dermal applications, Glycerin
Kolliwax ®
HCO (hydrogenated castor Humectant
oil) has 5.0 use in semi-solid
various
3.1 Kolliphor
functions acrossCS a20rangePolyoxyl
®
of dosage 20forms.
cetostearyl ether
Generally used at lowEmulsifier
levels 3.1 formulations is
(0.1-2
II
3.2 wt.%), Kolliwax IPM
Kollicream
Heat phaseHCO may
I
®®
and be utilized
Isopropyl
II by the formulator to (1) build
myristate
separately to 85-90 °C. Mix and
Emollient phase 3.2 Heat phase I and II separately to
stabilize viscosity
3.1 Kollicream due to OD a higher
® melting point and (2) increase retention
Octyldodecanol on
Emollient 3.1 the high melting
I and II, homogenize for 5 minut
the skin, scalp I or
and hair II,surface
homogenize
through for oil
a higher 5molecular
minutes at about
weight and size 5000
and rpm,
2.8 Mineral oil Light mineral Emollient 2.8 point
then and effi-
transfer to 4- blade impelle
cy factor
hydrophobic
1.9 then transfer
chemistry.
Kolliwax HCO ® to 4- blade impeller
Hydrogenated castor oil mixer at 200 rpm. Atfactor
Consistency 1.9
40and °CGMS add cient
40 °C multi-phase
add phase III, and continu
II phase III, monostearate
and continue toII)cool while stirring.
Consistency factor/
cy factor/ Materials
2.0 Kolliwax Methods
®
Glyceryl (type 2.0
Once the formulation reaches 30
fier Once the formulation reaches 30 °C, store in a sealed co-emulsifier consistency
cy factor 6.1 Kolliwax CSA 50 Cetostearyl alcohol Function
®
Consistency factor 6.1 glass container for a minimum o
Phase Tradename
IIII
glass container for a minimum of 24 hours prior to
Chemical
Preservative Water Preservative
Di Water Solvent
%
Preservative
72.6 0.2 building.
ve 0.2
Glycerinevaluation.
evaluation.
Kolliphor CS 20 ®
Glycerin
Polyoxyl 20 cetostearyl ether
Humectant
Emulsifier
5.0
3.1
In topical der-
FormulationKollicream IPM
Properties Emollient
Isopropyl myristate Emollient 3.2
mal applications,
Heat phase I and II separately to 85-90 °C. Mix phase
®
II
Kollicream OD Octyldodecanol
®
3.1 I and II, homogenize for 5 minutes at about 5000 rpm,
Mineral oil
Kolliwax HCO
Light mineral oil
Hydrogenated castor oil
Emollient 2.8
then transferKolliwax ®
HCOmixer
to 4- blade impeller (hydroge-
at 200 rpm. At
a rich cream Consistency factor 1.9
®
es functionality
III Preservativeof the
1000 lipids. Rheological evaluation
Preservative Preservative demonstrates
0.2
evaluation.
1000
lation. G’/G” values greater than one; indicative of structured formulation. of dosage forms. Generally
Viscosity (Pa s)
Viscosity (Pa s)
ntribu- Formulation
hear sweeps
100 Properties
indicate minimal hysteresis, in part from the contribu- used at 100
low levels (0.1–2
that tion of Kolliwax
The formulation ®
produces HCO ascream
a rich a consistency
that absorbs intobuilding
the skin,component that 10000
resulting10 in theformulation
formation of a robustness.
thin occlusive barrier through the and macroscopic wt.%), 10KolliwaxIncreasing
®
HCO shear may
rate
o- conditions
hear sweeps 1 and elevated
indicate temperature
minimal hysteresis, (40°C/75%
in part from the contribu-R.H.). Micro- 100 to (1) build 1 and stabilize vis-
tion of Kolliwax HCO as a consistency building component that
cosity due to a higher melt-
®
ty of scopic images evidence the consistency-building functionality of
increases formulation robustness. Microscopic and macroscopic 10
0,1
droplet Kolliwax 0,1 ® CSA 50 as well as Kolliwax® HCO through the interdroplet
evaluations 0,01 confirm the formulation remains ing point 0,01 and (2) increase
0,1 1 stable at ambient
10 100 1000 0,1 1
e structures
conditions and(left andtemperature
elevated center images) (40°C/75% and characteristic
R.H.). Micro- Maltese 1
scopic images
cross patterns evidence
in the the cross-polarized
consistency-building
Shear ratefunctionality
images
(s-1) (right of image).0,1
retention on the skin, scalp, Shear rate (s-
Kolliwax CSA 50 as well as Kolliwax HCO through the interdroplet 0,1or hair1 surface 10 through a 1000
® ®
0,01 100
structures (left and center images) and characteristic Maltese
cross patterns in the cross-polarized images (right400x Shear rate (s1000x
)
-1
image). 200x
1000x
400x x-pol 1000x 200x
x-pol
30 M AY 2 0 1 8 | P H A R M T E C H SPON SO R ED CO N TEN T
Case Studies: Excipient
Semisolid
Dosage
Topical
Formulation
Functional Excipient Formulation Selection for Topical
Forms Trends
Excipients Selection Development
Formulations
higher molecular weight and size and hy- robustness. Microscopic and macroscopic
drophobic chemistry. evaluations confirm the formulation re-
mains stable at ambient conditions and
Materials and Methods
elevated temperature (40°C/75% R.H.).
Heat phase I and II separately to
Microscopic images evidence the consis-
85–90 °C. Mix phase I and II, homogenize
for 5 minutes at about 5000 rpm, then tency-building functionality of Kolliwax®
transfer to 4-blade impeller mixer at 200 CSA 50 as well as Kolliwax® HCO through
rpm. At 40 °C add phase III, and continue the interdroplet structures (left and center
to cool while stirring. Once the formula- images) and characteristic Maltese cross
tion reaches 30 °C, store in a sealed glass patterns in the cross-polarized images
container for a minimum of 24 hours prior (right image).
to evaluation.
Summary
Formulation Properties As the market for topical drugs expands,
The formulation produces a rich cream
formulators are looking for options that
that absorbs into the skin, resulting in
are not only consumer friendly, but also
the formation of a thin occlusive barrier
solve formulation challenges. Formula-
through the functionality of the lipids.
Rheological evaluation demonstrates tors consider numerous factors including
G’/G” values greater than one; indicative the indication, application site, patient
of structured formulation. compliance, ease of application, and API
Shear sweeps indicate minimal hys- compatibility and stability. Accessing a
teresis, in part from the contribution of broad excipient portfolio gives formulators
Kolliwax® HCO as a consistency building flexibility while developing gels, foams,
component that increases formulation creams and other topical products.
31 M AY 2 0 1 8 | P H A R M T E C H SPON SO R ED CO N TEN T
Semisolid
Dosage
Topical
Formulation
Functional Excipient Formulation Semi-Solid
Forms Trends
Excipients Selection Development
Dosage Forms
Semi-Solid
Dosage Forms
Adeline Siew, PhD
M
atthias Springfelter, senior Transdermal delivery systems can be de-
formulation scientist at signed to offer prolonged and controlled-
Recipharm Pharmaceutical release absorption of certain drugs, which
Development AB, Solna, can be convenient for pain relief drugs,
Sweden, spoke to Pharmaceutical Technol- nicotine, and hormone products.
ogy about the advantages and the key con-
siderations in developing topical formulations. Drug Absorption
PharmTech: Can you tell us more about
Advantages the mechanisms of drug absorption across
PharmTech: What advantages do topical the skin barrier and how they affect the
formulations offer compared to other dos- development of topical drug products?
age forms?
Springfelter: The human skin functions
Springfelter: Perhaps the most obvious as an efficient barrier against the outside
advantage is that topical formulations environment. Achieving sufficient drug ab-
allow for local treatment of a number of sorption can, therefore, prove challenging
dermatological conditions with very little for many molecules. For a drug to reach its
systemic exposure. A high drug load can target site or to be absorbed into the blood
be applied on the actual site where the stream, a sufficient amount has to pass
drug is required, with a reduced risk of through the outer part of the epidermis,
unwanted side effects. Topical products the stratum corneum, and the epidermis.
are easy for the patient to apply and the Even though there are some passages,
moisturizing effect of topical formulations, such as the hair follicles, sweat glands,
such as creams and ointments, may also and active transportation mechanisms, the
be beneficial for several skin conditions. most important mechanism for drug ab-
Transdermal delivery systems offer an al- sorption is by passive diffusion. The rate of
ternative route for systemic administration diffusion will, to a large extent, depend on
of various drugs with the benefit of a re- the properties of the drug molecule itself.
duced risk of loss of potency or unwanted However, formulators can use a number of
variability due to first-pass metabolism. methods to optimize drug absorption.
32 M AY 20 1 8 | P H A R M T E C H
Semisolid
Dosage
Topical
Formulation
Functional Excipient Formulation Semi-Solid
Forms Trends
Excipients Selection Development
Dosage Forms
33 M AY 20 1 8 | P H A R M T E C H
Semisolid
Dosage
Topical
Formulation
Functional Excipient Formulation Semi-Solid
Forms Trends
Excipients Selection Development
Dosage Forms
34 M AY 20 1 8 | P H A R M T E C H
Semisolid
Dosage
Topical
Formulation
Functional Excipient Formulation Semi-Solid
Forms Trends
Excipients Selection Development
Dosage Forms
35 M AY 20 1 8 | P H A R M T E C H