 The study employed a cluster-randomized design, with randomization carried out within matched pairs.

Briefly, eight ‘sites’ eligible for delivery of the intervention (each comprising one or two administrative
Parishes) were identified on the basis of operational and programmatic considerations.
 All sites were separated from each other by a geographical buffer (at least one parish wide) to reduce the
potential for intervention diffusion into control sites.
 The names of the two communities within a matched pair were written on identical pieces of paper which
Blinding of were then folded and put in a bag. One paper was blindly drawn from the bag, the selected name was
intervention, assigned as an intervention community, and the other designated as a control.
Treatment, and  Control sites were waitlisted to receive the full intervention upon study completion.
control  A person was eligible for inclusion in the survey if they usually lived in the household and shared food, had lived in
delivery the area for at least a year, and were 18-to 49-years old. A limit of one respondent per household was set out of
consideration for respondent safety and confidentiality.

Logic Model
The intervention logic model maps out the key contextual variables that may influence intervention impact; the
levels of SASA! activities conducted in different spheres of influence; the expected initial, intermediate and longer
term outcomes of the intervention; and the long-term sustained impact the intervention is designed to have on the
community.