You are on page 1of 1

Shane Kopischke

Roy Acuff Seminar


Freddie Ashley
09/30/19
Mauritius
Theresa Rebeck
Mauritius follows a woman named Jackie who has recently come into possession
of a collection of stamps. The play begins with her trying to get them appraised, but she
is not willing to pay the fee that Philip, the philatelist, is asking for to look at them. In that
shop she meets Dennis, who looks over her stamps and realizes there are two of the
rarest stamps in the world in her collection. We then learn that Jackie actually sort of
stole the stamps from her half-sister, Mary. Jackie begins trying to sell the stamps as
Mary is intent on keeping them or donating them to a museum. In the climactic end of
the play, a fight breaks out as Jackie is trying to illegally sell the stamps for cash and
Philip lets everyone know that the stamps could be fake.
The play is fairly “normal” in structure, it is how Rebeck uses that structure that is
interesting. When the play begins, it really does seem like it is just going to be about
stamps. But because of the way Rebeck wrote the characters, the play takes a very
Miller-esque turn into insanity. Using a “normal” structure for this play works because I
feel that a more outside-of-the-box approach to the structure would take away from how
great the story being told is.
In Mauritius, Rebeck asks the audience to reevaluate where their moral loyalties
lie. In the beginning, it feels like there is not really an antagonist, though a case could be
made for Mary. However, as things unravel, it is clear that every character in the play
has bad or at least misplaced intentions and none of them are really trying to do the
“right thing.” The theme of the play is really just “questionable but valid bad choices”. It
works because the characters are written well and all of them feel justified for what they
are doing.
Rebeck pulled off what she was going for with Mauritius elegantly. This play
reads like a mix between an American classic and a very contemporary piece. By the
second scene, I was already completely reeled in because I could not help but wonder if
it was going to be about anything other than stamps. The fact that Rebeck did that, and
really did just write a play about stamps, at least on the surface, is remarkable. The
pacing is excellent and the choices all feel genuine, as insane as some of them are.
It might be hard to get an audience to see a show about stamps, but once they’re
in their seats they should be gripped through the whole play. While audiences could get
turned off because of the subject matter initially, Rebeck masterfully ropes them back in
with sharp writing that feels like an homage to classic American theatre, where nothing
really happens until EVERYTHING happens.

You might also like