You are on page 1of 1

 Partition inter vivos requires a prior will

216. Romero v. Villamor, GR L-10850, Dec. 20, 1957, 102 Phil. 641
 Partition inter vivos void where will void
217. Legasto v. Verzosa, GR 2344, Mar. 31, 1930, 54 Phil. 766
 Partition of estate in will valid
218. Dizon-Rivera v. Dizon, GR L-24561, June 30, 1970, 33 SCRA 554
 Partition of inherited property need not be in a public document
219. Alejandrino v. CA, GR 114151, Sept. 17, 1998, 295 SCRA 536
 Oral partition valid; non-registration of extrajudicial settlement does not affect its validity
220. Heirs of Teves v. CA, GR 109963, Oct. 13, 1999, 316 SCRA 632
o PARTITION BY THIRD PERSON OR MANDATORY
o PARTITION PRESUMED FROM ACTS INTENDED TO DIVIDE ESTATE
 Sale deemed to be a partition
221. Tuason v. Tuason, Jr., GR L-3404, Apr. 2, 1951, 88 Phil. 428
o TESTATOR EMPOWERED TO FORBID PARTITION FOR 20 YEARS
216. Marasigan v. Marasigan, G.R. No. 156078, March 14, 2008

o CREDIT ASSIGNED TO CO-HEIR IN PARTITION; WARRANTY OF DEBTOR’S SOLVENCY


o INSTANCES WHEN THERE IS NO MUTUAL WARRANTY
o RESCISSION AND NULLITY OF PARTITION
o RESCISSION OF PARTITION DUE TO LESION
o PARTITION MADE BY TESTATOR HIMSELF NOT SUBJECT OF RESCISSION
o ACTION FOR RESCISSION DUE TO LESION; PRESCRIPTIVE PERIOD
o DEFENDANT’S OPTIONS; FORMS OF INDEMNITY
o HEIR WHO ALIENATED SHARE CANNOT SUE FOR RESCISSIO

You might also like