In our course, we perceive that the natural contiguous keeps us healthy and in turn,

probably promotes physical performance as well (Almusaed 2006). Occupants of

built environments do not want simply to work, play, eat, or sleep in a functional
building. They want to be inspired, invigorated, comforted, and reassured by their
surroundings. They want spaces that will make them more appropriate, comfortable
(Larsen et al. 1998). In the natural representation, the solution to architectural
sustainability is to work with, not against, nature; to understand, sensitively exploit
and simultaneously avoid damaging the nature systems. As a planner and landscape
architect, the concept of biophilia deserves a deeper explanation. The hypothesis is
accurate when the affiliation leads to positive responses in terms of human performance
and health even emotional states. The new orientation of actual researches on
biophilic architecture aims to move the human actions under an architectural roof
toward the green of the large nature; this movement intends to create:
• Natural and physical frameworks become more than friendly.
• The energy consummate by our buildings is most well organized.
• The human development by effectively managing of natural resources is effective.
• The negative effects of climate change become more reduced.