Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Jacinto V People Digest
Jacinto V People Digest
FACTS: In June 1997, Baby Aquino, handed petitioner -collector of Mega Foam, a post dated
checked worth P10,000 as payment for Baby’s purchases from Mega Foam International, Inc.
The said check was deposited to the account of Jacqueline Capitle’s husband-Generoso. Rowena
Recablanca, another employee of Mega Foam, received a phone call from an employee of Land
Bank, who was looking for Generoso to inform Capitle that the BDO check deposited had been
dishonored. Thereafter, Joseph Dyhenga talked to Baby to tell that the BDO Check bounced.
However, Baby said that she had already paid Mega Foam P10,000 cash in August 1997 as
replacement for the dishonored check.
Dyhengco filed a compliant with the National Bureau of Investigation (NBI) and worked out an
entrapment operation with its agents. Thereafter, petitioner and Valencia were arrested. The NBI
filed a criminal case for qualified theft against the two (2) and Jacqueline Capitle.
RTC rendered a decision that Gemma, Anita and Jacqueline GUILTY beyond reasonable doubt
of the crime of QUALIFIED THEFT and each of the sentenced to suffer imprisonment of Five
(5) years, Five (5) months and Eleven (11) days to Six (6) years, Eight (8) months and Twenty
(20) days.
ISSUE: Whether or not the crime committed falls the definition of Impossible Crime.
HELD: Yes, Since the crime of theft is not a continuing offense, petitioner’s act of receiving the
cash replacement should not be considered as continuation of the Theft.
Therefore, the Supreme Court held that petitioner Gemma T. Jacinto is found GUILTY of an
impossible crime and suffer the penalty of Six (6) months of arresto mayor and pay courts.