A COMPARISON OF SENSORY AND MOTOR BLOCK OF A

SINGLE BOLUS INJECTION OF 0.1% ROPIVACAINE AND 0.2%

ROPIVACAINE IN LABOUR EPIDURAL ANALGESIA
Loo, C.C.; Chong, J.L.; Chiu, J.W.
Free Acc ess

Author Information
Dept of Anaesthesia, KK Women's & Children's Hospital, Republic of Singapore.

Abstract S256
INTRODUCTION: Ropivacaine is a relatively new local anaesthetic and the recommended concentration
is 0.2%. We would like to determine if the 0.1% concentration could achieve similar degree of analgesia
but with less motor block. We compared the sensory and motor block of a single bolus injection of similar
dose but different concentration of ropivacaine (0.1% vs 0.2%) in labour epidural analgesia.
METHODS: 30 primigravida parturients in active labour, with cervical dilatation 5 cm or less, were
randomly assigned to receive a single bolus injection of either 20 ml 0.1% ropivacaine or 10 ml 0.2%
ropivacaine. This was a prospective, randomised and double blinded study. Assessment of motor
(Bromage), sensory (pinprick) and pain relief (VAS) were performed 20 min after the injection. If the
Bromage score was zero, the parturients were assessed for straight leg raising weakness with a 4 point
weakness scale(0=no weakness, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe). Additional top ups were administered if
there was inadequate pain relief 20 min after the injection of the test drug.
RESULTS: The pain scores, quality of analgesia and the height of sensory block between the two groups
were not statistically significant. Although all parturients had Bromage score of 0, some degree of
qualitative weakness (straight leg raising) could still be elicited in some parturients. 20% of parturients
had straight leg raising weakness in the 0.1% concentration group vs 66.7% in the 0.2% concentration
group, and the difference was significant (p=0.027).
DISCUSSION: We concluded that with the same dose of ropivacaine, 0.1% concentration was associated
with less motor block but similar sensory block and degree of labour analgesia as compared to the 0.2%
concentration.

© 1999 International Anesthesia Research Society