Universidad Nacional Abierta y a Distancia

Academic and Research Vice-rector

Activities guide and evaluation rubric Phase 3 - Identify and
evaluate a wind project in the world

1. General description of the course

Faculty or Escuela de Ciencias Agrícolas, Pecuarias y del

Academic Unit Medio Ambiente
Academic Level Profesional
Academic Field Formación complementaria
Course Name Energía Eólica
Course Code 358052
Course Type Theoretical Can be yes ☒ No ☐
enabled
Number of Credits 3

2. Description of the activity

Number
Type of the
Individual ☐ Collaborative ☒ of 3
activity:
weeks
Moment of Unit
Initial ☐ ☒ Final ☐
evaluation: Intermediate:
Delivery Environment of the
Evaluative score of the
activity: Monitoring and evaluation
activity: 100
of learning
Starting date of the activity:
Deadline of the activity: Sunday,
Sunday, 22 of
13 of October of 2019
September of 2019
Competence to develop:
As a group they should explore and develop ideas regarding the
evolution of alternative energies, explaining examples and generating
discussion about the incidence of wind projects in the world.
Topics to develop:
History of Alternative Energies in the World.
Wind energy projects.
Valuation of wind energy projects.
Steps, phases of the learning strategy to develop
1. Presentation of each of the participants in the collaborative group.
2. Reading of contents of unit 2.
3. Choice in group of project to evaluate.
4. Project evaluation.
5. Consolidation of final document in group.
Describe how you are going to develop the learning strategy
Activities to develop
1. Each one of the students must present themselves in the forum that
is in the Collaborative Learning Environment.
2. Then, through a concerted decision, the group will choose one of the
proposed readings:
 Juárez-Hernández, S., & León, G. (2014). Energía eólica en el
istmo de Tehuantepec: desarrollo, actores y oposición social.
 Maya Ochoa, C., Hernández Betancur, J. D., & Gallego Múnera, Ó.
M. (2012). La Valoración De Proyectos De Energía Eólica en
Colombia Bajo El Enfoque De Opciones Reales. Cuadernos de
Administración (01203592), 25(44), 193–231.
 Otero, F. ( 1 ), Cerne, B. ( 2 ), & Campetella, C. ( 2,3 ). (2016),
Preliminary wind speed study in San Julian in reference to wind
power generation. Meteorologica, 59–79.
(Which are in the knowledge environment Unit 2).
3. In Group they will evaluate the chosen project based on the Wind
Project Evaluation format (see Annex Wind Project Evaluation)
4. In the environment of monitoring and evaluation of learning, they
will deliver one document per group.
Collaborative Learning Environment: Presentation
Environment
and development of the activity.
for the
Learning monitoring and evaluation environment:
development
Delivery of the requested document.
Individual:
In this activity individually each member of the group
must review the knowledge environment and
perform the readings of unit 2.
Products to
After reading, each student should propose one of
deliver by
the proposed readings and argue the reasons why it
student
should be chosen. For this, everyone must know the
content of the 3 proposals.
Each student must propose a region in which they
will develop the Wind Energy project, specifying
Georeference of the place, environmental conditions
and explain how the wind influences in said selected
region, justify why I select said site according to the
main topics. This activity is very important since it is
the base of the following activities of the course.

Collaborative:
Develop the evaluation of the project with the
attached format.
Present proposals for a defined region. All group
proposals must be related.

Structure of work

• Project evaluation (3 pages).

• Compiled region proposals (3 pages).
• References (1 page).

Work format

Sheet size: letter

Margins: top, bottom, left and right of 2.54 cm
Line spacing: simple
Text: Time new roman 12 points
Delivery format: PDF

File name

Group number - Name of the activity and phase.

Publication
The work must be loaded in the corresponding
monitoring and evaluation environment.

NOTE: ALL DOCUMENT MUST BE PRESENTED

IN ENGLISH LANGUAGE
 General guidelines for the collaborative work

Planning of
 Collaborative work planning.
activities for
 Design of collaborative work.
the
 Development of collaborative work.
development
 Analysis of results obtained by students in
of
collaborative work.
collaborative
 Production of deliverables in collaborative work.
work
Compiler: Consolidate the document that is constituted
as the final product of the debate, taking into account
that the contributions of all the participants have been
included and that only the participants who participated
in the process are included
Reviewer: Ensure that the writing complies with the
rules for submission of work required by the teacher
Evaluator: Ensure that the document contains the
Roles to
criteria present in the rubric. You must inform the
perform by
person in charge of the alerts so that you inform the
the student
other members of the team in case there is an
in the
adjustment to be made on the subject.
collaborative
Deliveries: Alert about the delivery times of the
group
products and send the document in the stipulated
times, using the resources destined for the shipment,
and indicate to the other colleagues that the delivery
has been made.
Alerts: Ensure that the members of the group are
notified of the novelties in the work and inform the
teacher through the working forum and the messaging
of the course, that the document has been sent.
Compiler: Consolidate the document that is constituted
as the final product of the debate, taking into account
Roles and
that the contributions of all the participants have been
responsibilit
included and that only the participants who participated
y for the
in the process are included
delivery of
Reviewer: Ensure that the writing complies with the
products by
rules for submission of work required by the teacher
students
Evaluator: Ensure that the document contains the
criteria present in the rubric. You must inform the
 person in charge of the alerts so that you inform the
other members of the team in case there is an
adjustment to be made on the subject.
Deliveries: Alert about the delivery times of the
products and send the document in the stipulated
times, using the resources destined for the shipment,
and indicate to the other colleagues that the delivery
has been made
Alerts: Ensure that the members of the group are
notified of the novelties in the work and inform the
teacher through the working forum and the messaging
of the course, that the document has been sent
The APA Standards is the style of organization and
presentation of information most used in the area of
social sciences. These are published under a Manual
that allows you to have access to the ways in which a
scientific article should be presented. Here you can find
Use of
the most relevant aspects of the sixth edition of the
references
APA Standards Manual, such as references, citations,
preparation and presentation of tables and figures,
headings and seriation, among others. You can check
how to implement them by going to
http://normasapa.com/
In the agreement 029 of December 13, 2013, article
99, are considered as faults that undermine the
academic order, among others, the following: literal e)
"Plagiarism, that is, present as its own authorship the
whole or part of a work, work, document or invention
made by another person. It also implies the use of
citations or missing references, or propose where there
Plagiarism is no coincidence between it and the reference "and
policy liberal f)" The reproduction, or copy for profit,
educational materials or results of research products,
which have intellectual rights reserved for the
University.

The academic sanctions that the student will face are

the following:
a) In the cases of academic fraud demonstrated in the
academic work or respective evaluation, the
qualification that will be imposed will be zero point zero
(0.0) without prejudice of the corresponding
disciplinary sanction.
b) In cases related to plagiarism demonstrated in the
academic work whatever their nature, the qualification
that will be imposed will be zero point zero (0.0),
without prejudice of the corresponding disciplinary
sanction.
 4. Evaluation rubric

Evaluation rubric

Individual Collaborative
Activity type: ☐ ☒
Activity Activity
Moment of the Unit
Initial ☐ ☒ Final ☐
evaluation Intermediate:
Assessed Performance levels of the individual activity
Score
Aspects High score Media score Low score
The student
made the
The student
Participations
made some
in the Forum,
Participation,
they are The student did
but did not
Individual quality and not participate
deliver it as
Participation in deliver them in the Forum 10
requested in
the Forum as requested
the integrated
in the
guide
integrated
guide
(up to 10 (up to 5 (up to 0
points) points) points)
Individual
Individual participation in The student
participation in the did not present
N/A
the presentation of the region
15
presentation of the region proposal
the region proposal
proposal (up to 15 (up to 0
points) points)
Performance levels of the collaborative
Assessed
activity Score
Aspect
High score Media score Low score
Did the Did the
Evaluation of
selection and selection and The evaluation
the Energy
evaluation of evaluation of was not 35
project
the energy the energy performed
selected
project project
 (Up to 35 (Up to 20 (Up to 0
points) points) points)
They made the They made the
region region The selection of
The region for selection and a selection and a the region was
project description of description of not performed 25
selection the same the same
(Up to 25 (Up to 15 (Up to 0
points) points) points)
The
information
Information is The requested
presented an
presented, but information is
excellent
its content is not displayed in
structure,
not consistent the body of the
justification
with the work. It has
Body, writing and
agreed in the spelling errors 5
and spelling presentation,
group. It and
spelling and
presents shortcomings of
writing,
writing flaws writing
complying with
the request
(Up to 5 (Up to 3 (Up to 0
points) points) points)
It presents the
The literature
bibliography,
presents an
but it lacks the There is no
excellent
structure bibliography
Bibliography structure and 10
requested in
presentation
the Guide
(Up to 10 (Up to 5 (Up to 0
points) points) points)
Final score 100