Republic of the Philippines Department of Education Region Vil, Central Visayas DIVISION OF BOHOL City of Tagbilaran November 21, 2018 DIVISION MEMORANDUM. No. To GO4 5.2018 EVALUATION OF ARALING PANLIPUNAN DETAILED LESSON PLAN : PUBLIC SCHOOLS DISTRICT SUPERVISORS (PSDS)/OIC-PSDSs ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SCHOOL HEADS, ELEMENTARY TEACHERS, ‘AND ALL OTHER CONCERNED: To ensure the provision of a quality Professional Development Materials (POMs), there will be an evaluation of all Araling Panlipunan (AP) Detailed Lesson Plans (DLPs) version 1.01 of all elementary grade levels which will be assigned to each district. All AP subject specialists are designated as chairman of special committee who shall coordinate and lead in the evaluation of these instructional materials and its members are the teachers of the grade assigned to them. The evaluation of AP-DLP will be done in Saturday during LAC Session period in order not to disrupt classes. Teachers who shall be involved in this activity shall be granted a Compensatory Time Off (CTO), Likewise, all Public Schools District Supervisors are requested to monitor and provide technical assistance during the evaluation process. The evaluation period will be done within the months of November and December, 2018. ‘Submission of the evaluation result and accomplishment report including attendance sheet and pictures will be on December 27, 2018. This memorandum will serve as the DESIGNATION of the AP subject specialist who will act as Chairman of a Special Committee to evaluate the Araling Panlipunan Detailed Lesson Plans. For the District Grade Assignment, kindly follow the Grade assignment and quarter agreed during the 3° Quarter Conference for Araling Panlipunan held in Sikatuna district ast November 9, 2018. Attached is the list of AP District Subject Specialist (AP-DSS) and evaluation sheet to be used during the evaluation of DLPs or you may copy the link from For your information, guidance and compliance. adh Pade il, ‘Schools Division SuperintendentUST OF AP SUBJECT SPECIALIST/ DISTRICT CHAIRMAN TO EVALUATE DETAILED LESSON PLAN GRADE DISTRICT ‘CHAIRMAN GRADE Alburquerque__—_—_—_—_| Rosalina Cerino ‘Alicia ‘Analiza Avegonzado _ ~ [Anda [Jessica elicita ‘Antequera Gemma Bulmabot Baclayon 7 Baliliahan -| —~F satuan MarivicAmang Bien Unido Irene Lawian Bilar Patricia Eusenia Grade Buenavista Beverly Lucile Degamo TT ealape Gerarda Hurano _ Candijay Josephine Lagang [Carmen West Narcisa Mawill a Carmen East Rolanida T. Turlga Catigbian Marissa Coboverde Clarin Edna S. Degamo Corella Ma. Lourdes C. Lupase | Cortes Susana T. Diola Grade ill Dagohoy Evelyn C. Carnice Danao Janice O. Muring Dauis Basilides S. Jumao-as Dimiao Nancy T. Mamanao Duero —_[ chon €. Tigbas (G-Hernandez Mila Luz Bompat - _— Getafe Mona Liza T. Daan ‘Guinduiman Venancia L. Orivillo ___| Inabanga North _____[Jonalyn €. Sendrejas _| Grade IV [ Inabanga South ZitaC. Robles —_ a [Jaana Dalizay C. Cacayan tila Marlon J. Caparas loay — Vivian A. Aranas _ —_[toboe Nelia Adecer | Loon North Josefina De Guzaman _| ‘Loon South Ma. Elvira Garcia [Mabini —__| Maria Britta Acosta | Maribojoe ssinia Arocha [Grade v Panglao [[Ma. Cristina Guinvenan Pilar _ ‘Azucdan Salva | Pres. CPG Marilou Orindain = —_| Sagbayan ‘Wilma Medina — San Isidro Rami Palionay ‘San Miguel Elma Ganub _ [Sierra Bullones Suzibel Baja { Sevilla [Regino Marfe I Sikatuna Mayoita Manlangit Grade Vi Talibon 1 __ Ma. Tina Requierme | [ Taibo — Hers FogGRADE DISTRICT “CHAIRMAN GRADE VI Trinidad ‘Maura Magallanes = = Tugibon East Loriliene Mejorada - TTubigon West Princess Acosta Ubay 1 Randy Revilla [Ubay2 Janet Egmilan | 7 ~ Ubay 3 Ruben Muraga Valencia Riza Tagapia ‘APPROVED: NIMFA D. BONGO, Ed.., CESO V Schools Division SuperintendentRepublic of the Philippines Department of Education Region Vil, Central Visayas Sudlon, Lahug, Cebu City Name of Teacher: (Pilot testing the iPlan), STRUCTIONAL PLAN (iPlan) PILOT TESTFEEDBACK FORM ‘This Feedback Form is to be accomplished by the teacherpilot testing the iPlan. The responses will be the basis for making the necessary revisions/modifications for improvement. Please answer all the questions and feel free to make honest comments about the iPlan. A ‘Thank you for your cooperation. Qualities of an Edueationally Sound iPlan (Qualities of an Educationally Sound iPlan Yes? No Remarks Content is accurate and reflects the ways in which knowledge is conceptualized within the domain Concepts presented in the iPlanare adequate to develop the skills the material intends to develop ‘Aciivities are logically sequenced (IfNo, please suggest the proper sequence) ‘The following are used correctly and appropriately, iF applicable: = terms and expressions = _ symbols and notations = diagrammatic representation = _ graphical representation ‘Uses content in ways that are real/authentic for leamers/asers: = are not oversimplified or trivialized ~ make sense to learners within their imaginary or real world ~__ are realistic within the relevant context Presents the same idea to learners/users in multiple/multi directional modes when applicable: = visual text (e.g. pictures, diagrams) = verbal (written) text + symbolic representations = oral (spoken) text = _ both static and dynamic images Learning objectives are made explicit to learners/users 7 8 9. Content is structured to scaffold learning Pre-requisite knowledge/skills are clearly identified and their connections to prior and future learning is established 10. Language used is appropriate to the intended learners/asers(Qualities of an Educationally Sound iPlan [ ves? No Remarks 1 Clear instructions for the activities are provided (IF No, please indicate which activity and give suggestions) 12, ‘There are activities that are time consuming (IF Yes, please state which activity) . Activities included in the iPlan do not confront or embarrass earners in any or all of the following ways: = require leamer to expose personal data which may embarrass them ~ invade leamers’ privacy ~ unfavorably compare learners” learning performance with learners” identity = unfavorably or stereotypically compare family or community characteristics with learners’ identity ~ unnecessarily or indiscriminately confront cultural beliefs or practices a Different activities that achieve the same learning outcome are available/presented is. Al assessment activities are aligned with the fearning objectives (If No, please specify which assessment activity) 16. All the learning objectives were met 17. All activities contained in the iPlan were carried within the given time allotment B. Please write your Over-All comments and suggestions on the table below: Major Strengths Major Weakness Plan Number: ‘Plan Writer: Learning Area: Grade Level: Quarter:Indicators for Factors 1 to 4 of the DepEd Evaluation Rating Sheet for General References Important: These indicators will serve as the evaluator’s guide in assigning points for specific criterion items under each Factor of the rating sheet. For ratings of 3 and below, indicate specific pages with findings applicable to the criterion item and briefly explain inadequacies noted in the space provided in the rating sheet. Factor 1: Content and Format 1. Content is suitable to the student's level of development. Indicators: 4- All content and topics are suitable to the student's level of development. 3 There are 1 to 2 concepts / topics not suitable to the student's comprehension. 2 There are 3 to 4 concepts / topics not suitable to the student's comprehension. 1 - There are 5 or more concepts / topics not suitable to the student's comprehension. 2. Instructional design contributes to the achievement of specific objectives of the subject area and grade level for which it is intended. Indicators: 4 Material contributes to achi grade / year level(s). 3 ~ Material contributes to achievement of 3 to 4 specific objectives of the intended subject area(s) and grade / year level(s). 2 Material contributes to achievement of I to 2 specific objectives of the intended subject area(s) and grade / year level(s). 1 - Material does not address any objective of the intended subject area(s) and grade / year level(s). jement of 5 or more specific objectives of the intended subject area(s) and 3. Language is appropriate for the level of the target user. Indicators: 4 Vocabiilary used is suitable to the target reader. 3 - There are | to $ words not suitable to the target reader. 2- There are 6 to 10 words not suitable to the target reader. 1 - There are more than 10 words not suitable to the target reader. 4, Material is free of ideological, cultural, rel Indicators. 4 There are no ideological, cultural, religious, racial, and gender biases and prejudices found in the material, 3. There are 1 to 2 violations based on the social content guidelines. 2. There are 3 10 4 violations based on the social content guidelines. 1 + There are 5 or more violations based on the social content guidelines. |, and gender biases and prejudices. 5. Visuals are relevant to the text and suitable to the interests of the target users. Indicators: 4— All visuals are relevant to the text and suitable to the interests of the target users. 3 There are 1 to 2 visuals not relevant to the text and/or not suitable to the interests of the target users. 2. There are 3 t0 4 visuals not relevant to the text and/or not suitable to the interests of the target users. 1- There are 5 or more visuals not relevant to the text and/or not suitable to the interests of the target users. 6. Visuals are clear in content and detail, Indicators: 4 ~All visuals are clear in content and detail. 3- There are | to 2 visuals NOT are clear in content and detail 2+ There are 3 to 4 visuals NOT are clear in content and detail 1- There are 5 or more NOT are clear in content and detail,7. Typographic layoutidesign adequately supports concepts presented Indicators: 4- the entire typographic layout/design adequately supports concepts presented. 3- There are | to 2 parts of the material that do NOT adequately support concepts presented. 2 There are 3 to 4 parts of the material that do NOT adequately support concepts presented. 1- There are 5 or more parts of the material that do NOT adequately support concepts presented. 8, Printing is of good quality (no broken letters, even density, correct alignment, properly placed screen registration) Indicators: 4=all indicators ate met. 3 There is | indicator NOT met. 2. There are 2 to 3 indicators NOT met. I- all indicators NOT met, 9, Material/paper used contributes to easy reading and is durable. Indicators. 4 Both criterion elements are sufficiently met. 3 - Only one criterion element is sufficiently met. 2- Both criterion elements are insufficiently I- Both criterion elements are unacceptable 9, Binding is suitable for its intended purpose and durable to withstand frequent use. Indicators: 4- Both criterion elements are sufficiently met. 3 - Only one criterion element is sufficiently met. 2- Both criterion elements are insufficiently 1- Both criterion elements are unacceptable. Factor 2: Accuracy and Up-to-dateness of Information 1. Conceptual errors. Indicators. 4-No conceptual error found 3-1 to 2 conceptual errors found 2-3 10 4 coneeptual errors found 1-5 or more conceptual errors found 2. Factual errors Indicators: 4—No factual error found 3-1 to 2 factual errors found 2-3 to 4 factual errors found 1 —5 or more factual errors found 3. Grammatical errors (if supplementary material is for English or Filipino subject, apply indicators used for conceptual errors) Indicators: 4—No grammatical error found 31 to 3 grammatical errors found 24 t0 6 grammatical errors found 1-7 or more grammatical errors found 4, Computational errors (if supplementary material is for mathematics, apply indicators used for conceptual errors) Indicators: 4 —No computational error found 3 ~1 t03 computational errors found 1 —4 to 6 computational errors found 1 ~7or more computational errors found5. Obsolete information Indicators. 4 —No obsolete information found 3 1 to 3 obsolete information found 2 ~4 to 6 obsolete information found 1 ~Tor more obsolete information found 6. Other errors such as errors in illustrations, diagrams, pictures, maps, graphs, and tables Indicators: 4=No error found 3-1 to 3 errors found 2-4 t0 6 errors found 17 or more errors foundLevel 2 DepEd Evaluation Rating Sheet for General References (Print or Digital Format) Title: z __ISBN. Author(s): Publisher/Distributor(s): Copyright Year: Language Used: No. of Pages: Instructions: Examine the material carefully and rate it along each evaluation criterion by encircling, the appropriate number [with 4 being Very Satisfactory (VS); 3 - Satisfactory (S); 2 - Fair; and 1 - Poor]. For a rating below 4, write your comments / justifications on each evaluation criterion. If an evaluation criterion is Not Applicable (NA), the material is rated 3 on said criterion. Attach extra sheets if necessary. Your report must be completed in ink. Please write legibly. Factor 1. Content and Format vs SF 1. Content is suitable to the student's level of development. 4 3 2 2. Instructional design of the material facilitates understanding 4 3 2 of concepts presented. 3. Language is appropriate for the level of the target user. 4 3 2 4, Material is free of ideological, cultural, religious, racial, 4 3 2 and gender biases and prejudices, 5. Visuals are relevant to the text and suitable to the 4 3 2 interests of the target user. 6. Visuals are clear in content and detail. 4 3 2 7. Typographic layout / design adequately supports concepts presented. 4 3 2 8. Printing is of good quality (ie., no broken letters, 4 3 2 even density, correct alignment, properly placed screen registration). 9, Material / Paper used contributes to easy reading and is durable. 4 3 2 10. Binding is suitable for its intended purpose and durable 4 3 2 to withstand frequent use TOTAL POINTS: Note: SLR must score atleast 30 paints out of a maximum 40 » points to pass this criterion. Please put a check mark on the PASSED appropriate box (FAILEDFactor 2. Accuracy and Up-to-dateness of Information ing scheme, with 4 as the mark very minimal errors) and / as the lowest (with many errors), classify your findings into the categories ‘You may add extra gory) based on the Note: SLR must score at least 20 points out of the maximum 24 total points to pass this criterion. Please put a check mark on the appropriate box. FAILED Categories Page No. ~ Recommendations / | Paragraph / wo (G) Gramma- “ Onn Specific Comment on Error = a a Line No. | Conceptual Computation | (9 Suagestions Errors tical Errors: al Errors: inform | an — - | - | Total No. of fe Brvors Equivateat | Total Points: | Points dbaseaC. Other Comments (Please write your comments and recommendations on the material not captured in Factors A and B. Use additional sheet/s if necessary.) Recommendation Note: A material which Failed in one of the two Factors in this rating sheet should not be | recommended for possible use in public schools. (Please put a check mark ({1) in the appropriate box.) © 1/ We recommend the approval of this supplementary material for possible use in public schools provided that the corrections / revisions included in this report are made, (Publisher must implement all recommended corrections / revisions in their next printing or provide an errata.) 1 1/ We do not recommend the approval of this supplementary material for possible use in public schools for the reasons stated below and/or cited in this evaluation report. (Please use separate sheet if necessary.) (Please sign below and at the back of each page.) 1/ We certify that this evaluation report and recommendation are my/our own and have been made without any undue influence from others, Evaluator(s): Signature(s): Date:__