MORDECAI M. KAPLAN
20 Kiser $719
His Exebeney,
‘Me. David Ben-Gurion,
Prime Minister of lal
Peace and Blessing
‘Upon my return yesterday from the West Coat of the United
Sates, T found the leer of Your Excellency, requesting my
pion regaring the desirable procedure forthe repsvaion of
ellen of mized parentage, inthe ete where both the parente—
the Jewish father and the aoaTewish motber—wish «9 reper
hem at Jews.
In oder to understand the nature ofthis problem, one must
view tints proper frame of refeeace. This frame of reference it
alluded toi the flowing excerpt from theft pareraph of yout
Jeter: “To formulate registration procedures conforming t0 the
Aeaition accepted by all Jewish spheres, secularist, in all thie
facto, and Orthodox Jew alte; procures applicable to the
specie constions prevaling in Issa, sovereign Jewish State,
hich guarantes the freedom of conscience and religion and
‘hich sees asthe conte for the Ingatherng ofthe Eile” This
sentence elucidates the content within which we must consider
the problem, in order tat it may eealy be understood. However,
‘pon analyzing this context, I ind hat it epee with conrade-
tions. The following are examples:
1) The assumption that there is indoed a “tadton accepted by
all Jewish sphere, secularists, in all thei factions and Orthodox
Jews allo” Is ULfounded, havlag bala neither in theory ne in
experience.
2) The very fact tha the Goverament hat given the Rabbinate
‘the authority to compel ll Jews to accept its json la mail
afi and in the settlement of etates,conrtates a denial o the
232
Response: Avsnican Scuouss
supposton that Israel “guarantees te freedom of conslence and
religion.” This supposition i further contradicted bythe fact that
‘the Government itself is obliged to gve consideration tothe view
point of the Rabbinste regarding the question as who should be
recogni asa Jew.
3) The Basi assumption thatthe State of sali @ Jewish State
is itself open to question. There is, indeed, an alternative t this
sssumploe, an slemative which, ae T propose to clay, wil
Gminish neither the Jewish character aor the Jevith valve of ef
fort a the establishment ofthe Jewish Sate
‘These contradictory aspects inthe comtext in which the prob
lem mst be considered, are not incidental they ate the rest of,
the complet inkerent in society. Tay ae a consequene ofthe
phenomenon ofthe development of modern mins which emancl-
pated the Jens and absorbed the. They rv a esl of the intel.
Ieetal revelation, wich transformed the approach to religous
‘eadtion. During this period we were acted with misfortune
and percouton, which deterred u fom adjusting normally tothe
‘ew material and splualenvicoameat. It therefore no wonder
that we pa scant tention to thor fndamental quesione afet-
ing our very enstence and fate: the deletion of our essential,
cfaracter aa socal nit and the determination of the stats of
this unit In vain dd the pow, J L, Gordon, complain that we are
ot truly a people but merely 2 flock. The truth is that we are
merely an aggregate of peopl,» mixed popalce.
‘Were it not forthe Zionist movement, we should have for-
foitea that we are a member of one mation and oer ancetort
‘were once “one people the land”; we should not have aspired to
the formation of social entity, the reality of which could searce
‘be doubted. Apropos ofthese claeatos i will now be possible
to feame an appropriate context which will enable us to under-
stand the problem under consideration and find an adequate
‘olution fort
41) Tee the Jewish Agency that made posible the etablishment
ofthe State of Israel as modern Stat. It modemly was fe
233‘ected rst by the vey fact that it came into bing, and secondly,
by the natre of is exten
"From its very inception, the State of Israel jgnored the tr
tonal blef tut we must avait the coming ofthe Mesiahy a