Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Market-access country (MAC) public debt sustainability analysis (DSA) is a risk-based tool.
See Figure 1, to the right, extracted from the Guidance Note. Guidance Note
Depth of analysis depends on the extent of vulnerabilities or use of Fund resources.
Higher Scrutiny - for exceptional access, high debt-burden, or high-vulnerability countries:
Analysis includes the basic DSA, standard alternative scenarios, the outcome of all modules in this
template, the heat map and a write-up.
Lower Scrutiny - for all other countries:
● Analysis includes the basic DSA and standard alternative scenarios, as well as contingent
liabilities shock when relevant. All other modules are optional. Write-up is optional.
● As debt vulnerabilities may emerge at lower debt levels than the ones suggested in Figure 1,
some "Lower Scrutiny" countries may be reclassified as "Higher Scrutiny". Conversely, some
countries with high gross debt burden may be treated as "Lower Scrutiny". See Guidance Note
for details on possible reclassification.
Data on debt service of existing debt should preferably come from the fiscal files or authorities' debt management office.
They may also be computed from a loan-by-loan breakdown of outstanding debt available from databases like Bloomberg, Datastream, Dealogic, BEL etc.
The breakdown between domestic- and foreign-currency denominated debt is important for capturing exchange rate risks.
The breakdown between existing and new debt (debt to be issued over the projection period) is important for capturing roll-over risks and interest rate risks.
4.c. Gross financing needs of the government are calculated automatically in row 37 (including debt service on new debt).
After adjusting for possible one-off financing factors (change in arrears, debt relief, privatization/drawdown of deposits and any other factors specified) in row
43, the template calculates the gross financing needs to be met by the issuance of new debt (row 45).
4.d. The template allows a wide range of debt instruments to finance the government, which can be differentiated by interest rate, grace period, maturity, curren
residency.
Not all debt instruments in the template need to be filled in. In principle, a single summary instrument could be used as an approximation.
Ensure that the terms and conditions of new debt are appropriate (cells J54-R89):
(i) Use the drop-down menu to select whether payments are annual or semi-annual (column J).
(ii) Fill in grace period and maturity (columns K and L) for each instrument. If grace is set equal to maturity, the template calculates amortization as a sin
payment at maturity (bullet bond).
(iii) Columns M-R determine the interest rate on new issuances; the interest rate can vary by instrument as well as by year of issuance.
Lines marked "ZERO-COUPON BOND" should be used only for such instruments to ensure the appropriate calculations of interest and amortization payments
4.e. By construction, residual financing needs will be met by the issuance of domestic short-term debt (row 89). The use of this line should be minimized as much
possible. Because this residual too represents debt issuance, it should not be allowed to become negative; please use row 42 or 43 to represent any accumul
deposits arising from debt issuance in excess of projected financing needs.
5. Go to Sheet "Input 5 - Scenario Design"
Populate the yellow-shaded cells:
5.a. Required shocks for scenario analysis depend on the country's level of scrutiny (see the Overview of the Framework, and the Guidance Note).
Based on information regarding debt burden and exceptional access status provided in "Input 1 - Basics," the template automatically determines the level of
scrutiny for the country (cell J7).
5.b. If the country is reclassified from Lower to Higher Scrutiny (or vice versa) because of risk-mitigating or risk-amplifying factors, the final scrutiny classification
specified in cell J8. (See Guidance Note for details on possible reclassification.)
5.c. Based on the level of scrutiny, required shocks are denoted in cells K13-K20, along with their respective descriptions in column M.
The template builds in interactions among shock variables (explained in column M). Sizes of shocks and interactions can be customized (see 5.g. below).
Additional shocks (if relevant), whether they are required, and their descriptions can be customized in rows 23-27.
5.d. As discussed in the Guidance Note, the MAC DSA framework includes a number of standardized alternative scenarios as well as a number of stress tests.
Standardized alternative scenarios are a historical scenario and a constant primary balance scenario (rows 13-14).
The macro-fiscal risk module includes five stress tests (rows 16-20):
(i) primary balance shock;
(ii) real GDP growth shock;
(iii) interest rate shock;
(iv) exchange rate shock;
(v) combined shock.
5.e. The financial sector contingent liability stress test is automatically triggered by developments in private sector credit growth and loan-to-deposit ratios.
If the shock was not triggered but needs to be included due other vulnerabilities not identified by the default indicators or their benchmarks, users can select
from the yellow-shaded drop-down menu (cell J23) to manually trigger the contingent liability stress test.
5.f. The template allows for two additional customized scenarios (including contingent liability shocks from non-financial sectors).
To run one or two customized shocks, select "Yes" from the drop-down menus in cells J25 and/or J27.
Users have the option to name the customized shocks in cells T25 and T27, which will appear in output tables and charts.
5.g. All possible shock scenarios are shown under Shock Assumptions (E32-J150), regardless of whether the shock is required.
Interactions between the variables are described in column B. If applicable, users may tailor the sizes of shocks and interactions in the yellow-shaded cells un
Shock Assumptions (column B), to reflect country-specific information.
For example, under the primary balance shock scenario, the revenue-to-GDP ratio is assumed to remain unchanged compared to the baseline and interest ra
new debt increases by 25 bps per 1 percent of GDP deterioration in the primary balance. But users may wish to increase the impact on interest rate of a
deterioration in the primary balance (cell B50), and include impact on real GDP growth (cells F43-J43).
6.c. Click on the blue button to generate the fan chart. Individual shocks can be turned off, using cells B42-B45, to analyze the source of uncertainty. (Note: macro
be enabled.)
6.d. To generate asymmetric fan charts, users may place restrictions on the magnitude of positive shocks in cells D42-D45.
e basic DSA debt-to-GDP chart in
mation.
ssuance.
nd amortization payments.
an-to-deposit ratios.
nchmarks, users can select "Yes"
199.9 187.3 188.6 209.4 219.3 223.9 266.3 356.9 437.8 499.2
157.8 134.1 144.8 165.1 180.8 193.1 229.6 285.6 297.6 373.1
201.9 235.3 238.3 248.6 255.0 309.3 340.0 400.6 378.8 413.1
155.7 86.0 95.0 125.8 145.0 107.8 155.9 241.9 356.5 459.2
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
650.6 736.4 840.7 951.3 1063.2 1204.7 1399.1 1577.6 1764.3 1926.6
2012 2013
1063.5
585.8
477.7
386.9
676.6
501.3
562.2
2012
67.9
56.4
11.5
142%
2104.4
1 - Please fill the yellow-shaded cells in rows 24, 25, 27, 28 with debt service forecast (principal and interest payme
entered in local currency units (LCU), unless otherwise specified. Data on debt service of existing debt may be obta
by-loan breakdown of outstanding debt obtained from databases like Bloomberg, Datastream, BEL, etc.
2 - Distribute the financing needs (identified in row 45) as new debts in yellow-shaded cells in rows 54-87.
3 - Please enter the terms and conditions of new debt in columns J-R. Note that new debt is assumed to be disbur
4 - Residual financing need is assumed to be filled by domestic short-term debt issuance (row 89). Please minimize
interest/amortization payments in the year of disbursement. Because this residual too represents debt issuance, i
represent any accumulation of deposits arising from debt issuance in excess of projected financing needs.
First Year of
projection
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
906.7
380.6
3,450.8
31.494
31.489
1,207.8
0.0
1,242.5
21.8
12.4
5.9
34.4
0.0
44.8
26.3
361.3
339.8
881.6
0.0
0.0
0.0
10.0
0.0
871.6
2018
870.0
460.0 Assumption: all new
340.0 domestic issuance is
denominated in local
340.0 currency. Semi-annual 1 1 5.0%
0.0 Semi-annual 1 1 5.0%
120.0
120.0
0.0 Annual 2 2 2.6%
0.0 Annual 3 3 2.6%
120.0 Annual 5 5 8.0%
0.0 Annual 10 10 4.6%
0.0 3 3 12.0%
0.0
0.0 Annual 2 2 4.0%
0.0 Annual 3 3 4.0%
0.0 Annual 5 5 4.0%
0.0 Annual 10 10 4.0%
0.0 3 3 6.0%
410.0 Assumption: all new
external debt is
310.0 denominated in
0.0 foreign currency Semi-annual 1 1 7.0%
310.0 Semi-annual 1 1 2.0%
100.0
0.0
0.0 Annual 2 2 10.0%
0.0 Annual 3 3 10.5%
0.0 Annual 5 5 11.0%
0.0 Annual 10 10 11.5%
0.0 3 3 12.0%
100.0
0.0 Annual 2 2 4.0%
0.0 Annual 3 3 4.5%
100.0 Annual 5 5 5.0%
0.0 Annual 10 10 5.5%
0.0 3 3 6.0%
1.60173 1 1 3.0%
Interest Rate on Interest Rate on Interest Rate on Interest Rate on Interest Rate on
debt issued in debt issued in debt issued in debt issued in debt issued in
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
If optional complementary analyses (net debt-to-GDP and/or debt to potential GDP) are selected in "Input 1 - Basics", these results will be presented in:
(i) the selected economic indicators table, and in (v) the debt-to-GDP graph.
Public gross financing needs 35.2 22.0 23.3 29.1 30.4 29.4 27.9 26.1 25.5 5Y CDS (bp) 500
Real GDP growth (in percent) 5.6 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Ratings Foreign Local
Inflation (GDP deflator, in percent) 7.1 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.5 4.0 4.0 4.0 Moody's Baa2 Baa2
Nominal GDP growth (in percent) 13.1 9.2 9.2 9.2 9.2 8.7 8.2 8.2 8.2 S&Ps BBB BBB
Effective interest rate (in percent) 4/ 11.2 9.2 7.8 7.7 8.3 7.8 7.7 8.0 6.6 Fitch BBB+ BBB+
10 20
projection
Debt-Creating Flows
(in percent of GDP)
5 15
10
0
5
-5
0
-10
-5
-15 -10
-20 -15
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 cumulative
Residual Other debt-creating flows Exchange rate depreciation Real interest rate Real GDP growth
Primary deficit Change in gross public sector debt
40 40
30 30
projection
20 20
projection
10 10
0 0
Alternative Scenarios
Baseline Historical Constant Primary Balance
54 30
52
25
50
20
48
15
46
projection 10 projection
44
42 5
40 0
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Underlying Assumptions
(in percent)
Baseline Scenario 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Historical Scenario 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Real GDP growth 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Real GDP growth 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Inflation 5.0 5.0 4.5 4.0 4.0 4.0 Inflation 5.0 5.0 4.5 4.0 4.0 4.0
Primary Balance -2.2 -1.7 -1.2 -0.9 -1.0 -1.0 Primary Balance -2.2 -1.4 -1.4 -1.4 -1.4 -1.4
Effective interest rate 7.7 8.3 7.8 7.7 8.0 6.6 Effective interest rate 7.7 8.3 8.0 7.9 8.3 6.9
Constant Primary Balance Scenario
Real GDP growth 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Inflation 5.0 5.0 4.5 4.0 4.0 4.0
Primary Balance -2.2 -2.2 -2.2 -2.2 -2.2 -2.2
Effective interest rate 7.7 8.3 7.7 7.5 7.8 6.4
4 2 8
2 6
0
c
0 4
-2
-2 2
Distribution of Distribution of
Distribution of -4
optimistic
More
Less
-1
-4
-3
-2
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Less
-3
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
-4
-2
-1
t-5 t-4 t-3 t-2 t-1 t t+1 t+2 t+3 t+4 t+5
Gross Nominal Public Debt Gross Nominal Public Debt Public Gross Financing Needs
(in percent of GDP) (in percent of Revenue) (in percent of GDP)
55 155 35
54
30
53 150
25
52
145 20
51
50 15
140
49
10
48 135
5
47
46 130 0
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Gross Nominal Public Debt Gross Nominal Public Debt Public Gross Financing Needs
(in percent of GDP) (in percent of Revenue) (in percent of GDP)
70 180 40
60 160 35
140
50 30
120
25
40 100
20
30 80
15
60
20
40 10
10 5
20
0 0 0
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Underlying Assumptions
(in percent)
Primary Balance Shock 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Real GDP Growth Shock 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Real GDP growth 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Real GDP growth 4.0 2.8 2.8 4.0 4.0 4.0
Inflation 5.0 5.0 4.5 4.0 4.0 4.0 Inflation 5.0 4.7 4.2 4.0 4.0 4.0
Primary balance -2.2 -2.1 -1.6 -0.9 -1.0 -1.0 Primary balance -2.2 -2.2 -2.2 -0.9 -1.0 -1.0
Effective interest rate 7.7 8.3 7.7 7.6 8.0 6.6 Effective interest rate 7.7 8.3 7.7 7.6 7.9 6.6
Real Interest Rate Shock Real Exchange Rate Shock
Real GDP growth 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Real GDP growth 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Inflation 5.0 5.0 4.5 4.0 4.0 4.0 Inflation 5.0 9.4 4.5 4.0 4.0 4.0
Primary balance -2.2 -1.7 -1.2 -0.9 -1.0 -1.0 Primary balance -2.2 -1.7 -1.2 -0.9 -1.0 -1.0
Effective interest rate 7.7 8.3 8.5 8.6 9.1 7.8 Effective interest rate 7.7 9.0 7.7 7.6 7.9 6.5
Combined Shock Contingent Liability Shock
Real GDP growth 4.0 2.8 2.8 4.0 4.0 4.0 Real GDP growth 4.0 2.8 2.8 4.0 4.0 4.0
Inflation 5.0 4.7 4.2 4.0 4.0 4.0 Inflation 5.0 4.7 4.2 4.0 4.0 4.0
Primary balance -2.2 -2.2 -2.2 -0.9 -1.0 -1.0 Primary balance -2.2 -8.4 -1.2 -0.9 -1.0 -1.0
Effective interest rate 7.7 9.0 8.4 8.4 8.9 7.7 Effective interest rate 7.7 9.1 7.8 7.4 7.7 6.5
Debt level 1/ Real GDP Primary Real Interest Exchange Rate Contingent
Growth Shock Balance Shock Rate Shock Shock Liability shock
60 60
50 50
40 40
30 30
Restrictions on upside shocks:
20 20 no restriction on the growth rate shock
no restriction on the interest rate shock
10 10 no restriction on the primary balance shock
no restriction on the exchange rate shock
0 0
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3
Annual Change in
External Financing Public Debt Held Public Debt in
Bond spread Short-Term Public
Requirement by Non-Residents Foreign Currency
Debt
(in basis points) 4/ (in percent of GDP) 5/ (in percent of total) (in percent of total) (in percent of total)
3/ The cell is highlighted in green if country value is less than the lower risk-assessment benchmark, red if country value exceeds the upper risk-assessment benchmark,
yellow if country value is between the lower and upper risk-assessment benchmarks. If data are unavailable or indicator is not relevant, cell is white.
Lower and upper risk-assessment benchmarks are:
200 and 600 basis points for bond spreads; 5 and 15 percent of GDP for external financing requirement; 0.5 and 1 percent for change in the share of short-term debt; 15
and 45 percent for the public debt held by non-residents; and 20 and 60 percent for the share of foreign-currency denominated debt.
4/ EMBIG (bp), an average over the last 3 months, 01-Jun-13 through 30-Aug-13.
5/ External financing requirement is defined as the sum of current account deficit, amortization of medium and long-term total external debt, and short-term total external
debt at the end of previous period.