Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Stunted Di Amerika PDF
Stunted Di Amerika PDF
300 Food and Nutrition Bulletin, vol. 27, no. 4 © 2006, The United Nations University.
Stunting and overweight in Latin American and Caribbean children 301
TABLE 1. Prevalence of stunting and overweight among children 0 to 5 years of age in Latin America and the Caribbean
in 2000
Stunting Overweight
Subregion or region % (95% CI) Millions (95% CI) % (95% CI) Millions (95% CI)
Caribbean subregion 7.4 (3.8–14.1) 0.3 (0.1–0.5) 4.1 (2.7–6.1) 0.14 (0.10–0.22)
Central American subregion 20.4 (12.5–31.5) 3.3 (2.0–5.1) 3.9 (2.8–5.4) 0.6 (0.5–0.9)
South American subregion 11.3 (6.5–18.9) 4.0 (2.3–6.7) 4.5 (3.5–5.9) 1.6 (1.2–2.1)
Latin America and the Caribbean 13.7 (9.1–18.4) 7.6 (5.0–10.2) 4.3 (3.5–5.2) 2.4 (1.9–2.8)
region
CI, confidence interval
302 P. Duran et al.
Caribbean
60 20
50
% Underweight
40 10
% Stunted
30
20 0
10
0 -10
1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010
Central America
70 20
60
50
% Underweight
10
40
% Stunted
30
20
0
10
-10 -10
1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010
South America
60 30
50
20
40
% Underweight
% Stunted
30
10
20
10
0
-10 -10
1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010
FIG. 1. Trends in the prevalence of stunting and overweight among children aged 0 to 5 years in Latin America and the
Caribbean from 1975 to 2002 according to subregion (Selected surveys from WHO Global Database on Child Growth and
Malnutrition)
Stunting and overweight in Latin American and Caribbean children 303
< .03) or South America (r = 0.205, p < .001). On the appears to be more limited in South America than in
other hand, the coefficient of correlation of per capita the other subregions.
GDP with the prevalence of stunting was higher in the The observed differences in the coexistence of
Caribbean (r = 0.62, p < .001) than in South America undernutrition and overnutrition among subregions
(r = 0.49, p < .001) or Central America (r = 0.24, may be related to their being at different stages in the
p < .017). When per capita GDP and prevalence of nutrition transition [18]. Early stages are characterized
stunting were included in the regression model analysis by food insecurity and high prevalences of underweight
as independent variables, only the latter showed a sig- and stunting, with little or no obesity. Improved socio-
nificant β coefficient (–0.09, SE = 0.04 and 0.02) for the economic development, along with urbanization, favors
Caribbean and South America. For Central America, excess weight gain in some segments of the population,
both the prevalence of stunting and per capita GDP but with persistent undernutrition, particularly in rural
were significantly correlated with each other, where the areas. This contrast in obesity prevalence between
model can be expressed as urban and rural areas has been well documented for
several Latin American and Caribbean countries [6].
Overweight = 4.1 + 0.0008 per capita GDP –
Finally, in a more advanced stage of socioeconomic
0.05% stunting + error.
transition, the rate of undernutrition will have a
Thus, even when GDP is associated with the preva- downward trend while the rates of overweight and
lence of overweight, this relationship is not similar in diet-related chronic diseases will continue to increase.
the three subregions. Although the Latin American and Caribbean region
as a whole is considered to be at a relatively advanced
stage of the nutrition transition, our results suggest
Discussion that there is still a great deal of variability among the
subregions.
Our study found significant differences in the preva- Stunting has been described as an independent risk
lence of stunting among the subregions in Latin factor for the development of obesity. Popkin et al.
America and Caribbean. Central America had the [19] estimated that the income-adjusted risk ratios of
highest prevalence and the Caribbean the lowest, while overweight for a stunted child ranged from 1.7 to 7.8
South America also had a low prevalence. In contrast, in children aged 3 to 6 and 7 to 9 years, respectively, in
the prevalence of overweight was similar across sub- nationally representative surveys from Russia, Brazil,
regions. South Africa, and China.
There was an inverse relationship between the The association between nutritional deficiency
prevalence rates of stunting and overweight, but and overweight has been described in populations
again, with clear differences between subregions. Our experiencing rapid changes in diet and physical activ-
analysis indicates that around 10% of the variability ity [20]. Doak et al. [8] compared the coexistence of
in the prevalence of overweight is dependent on the underweight and overweight in three nationally repre-
variability of the prevalence of stunting. Overall, these sentative surveys. The authors observed that 23%, 45%,
differences in prevalence could be explained by the and 58% of households in China, Brazil, and Russia,
different relative contributions of key risk factors for respectively, that had an underweight member also had
underweight and overweight, including socioeconomic an overweight member.
status, lifestyle, food accessibility, and physical activity On the basis of the number and characteristics of the
patterns, which themselves are likely to vary greatly studies included in the WHO database, we consider
across the region. that these results are valid, based on an ecological
The results from South America underscore the design, to describe the association between the preva-
importance of overweight in this subregion. The lence of stunting and overweight. The number of data
prevalence of overweight increased both in the segment points included in the present analysis (95 from the
of the population with a high prevalence of stunting Caribbean, 100 from Central America, and 270 from
and in those groups with lower prevalence rates of South America) represent 6 of the 24 countries in the
stunting. Caribbean, 7 of the 8 countries in Central America, and
As noted above, differences in social and economic 11 of the 14 countries in South America.
development across countries may account in part From the data analyzed, we conclude that an inverse
for the different relationships between stunting and relationship between stunting and overweight exists,
overweight observed in our study. It is recognized but with differences within the region. Data from South
that the interactions between poverty and affluence America showed higher prevalence of overweight in
determining the prevalences of underweight and over- subgroups with low or high prevalence of stunting.
weight are complex. The present analysis shows a less Recognition of the association between stunting and
strong relationship between GDP and overweight than overweight, its determinants, and differences among
between GDP and stunting. The contribution of GDP populations is essential for the formulation of nutrient
Stunting and overweight in Latin American and Caribbean children 305
intake recommendations and for the design of nutri- the poor [24]. But not only higher rates of obesity char-
tion interventions [21, 22]. The “nutrition paradox” acterize the process. The complexity of the nutrition
[23], the coexistence of nutritional deficit and excess, transition may lead to the coexistence of nutritional
underlines the difficulty of designing interventions deficits with overweight, even at the household level.
aimed at reducing undernutrition while addressing at This problem must first be recognized in order to
the same time the increasing problem of overweight design adequate and effective interventions [25]. Rapid
and obesity. changes in economic development and urbanization
The phenomenon of nutrition transition in the are relevant factors in this process, and have to be
region and worldwide is highly related to changes in accompanied by adequate food and nutrition policies,
lifestyles associated with the increase in obesity preva- promotion of physical activity and healthy habits to
lence. Rapid changes in dietary and physical activity reduce undernutrition and simultaneously prevent
patterns can explain the incremental changes in rates of overweight and obesity.
overweight and obesity, progressively shifting towards
References
1. de Onis M, Blossner M, Borghi E, Frongillo EA, Morris Accessed 4 September 2006.
R. Estimates of global prevalence of childhood under- 14. World Population Prospects. The 2004 revision. United
weight in 1990 and 2015. JAMA 2004;291:2600–6. Nations Population Division. Available at: http://
2. de Onis M, Frongillo EA, Blossner M. Is malnutrition esa.un.org/unpp/index.asp?panel=5#LatinAmerica.
declining? An analysis of changes in levels of child mal- Accessed 14 September 2006.
nutrition since 1980. Bull World Health Organ 2000; 15. International Statistics, United Nations Statistics Pro-
78:1222–33. grams. Available at: http://unstats.un.org/unsd/snaama/
3. Chinn S, Rona RJ. Prevalence and trends in overweight downloads/PerCapitaGDP-all.xls. Accessed 4 September
and obesity in three cross sectional studies of British 2006.
children, 1974-94. BMJ 2001;322:24–6. 16. de Onis M, Blossner M. The World Health Organization
4. de Onis M, Blossner M. Prevalence and trends of Global Database on Child Growth and Malnutrition:
overweight among preschool children in developing methodology and applications. Int J Epidemiol 2003;
countries. Am J Clin Nutr 2000;72:1032–9. 32:518–26.
5. Uauy R, Albala C, Kain J. Obesity trends in Latin 17. de Onis M, Blossner M, Borghi E, Morris R, Frongillo
America: transiting from under- to overweight. J Nutr EA. Methodology for estimating regional and global
2001;131:893S–9S. trends of child malnutrition. Int J Epidemiol 2004;
6. Martorell R, Khan LK, Hughes ML, Grummer-Strawn 33:1260–70.
LM. Obesity in Latin America women and children. J 18. Popkin B. The dynamics of the dietary transition in the
Nutr 1998;128:1464–73. developing world. In: Caballero B, Popkin B, eds. The
7. Popkin BM. The nutrition transition and obesity in the nutrition transition: diet and disease in the developing
developing world. J Nutr 2001;131:871S–3S. world. London: Academic Press, 2002:111–28.
8. Doak CM, Adair LS, Monteiro C, Popkin BM. Over- ����� 19. Popkin BM, Richards MK, Monteiro CA. Stunting is
weight and underweight coexist within households in associated with overweight in children of four nations
Brazil, China and Russia. J Nutr 2000;130:2965–71. that are undergoing the nutrition transition. J Nutr
9. Caballero B. Obesity as a consequence of undernutri- 1996;126:3009–16.
tion. J Pediatr 2006; 149: S97–99. 20. Popkin BM. The nutrition transition in low-income
10. Hoffman DJ, Sawaya AL, Verreschi I, Tucker KL, Roberts countries: an emerging crisis. Nutr Rev 1994;52:285–98.
SB. Why are nutritionally stunted children at increased 21. Gibson D. Food stamp program participation is posi-
risk of obesity? Studies of metabolic rate and fat oxida- tively related to obesity in low income women. J Nutr
tion in shantytown children from Sao Paulo, Brazil. Am 2003;133:2225–31.
J Clin Nutr 2000;72:702–7. 22. Frongillo EA. Understanding obesity and program par-
11. Hoffman DJ, Sawaya AL, Coward WA, Wright A, ticipation in the context of poverty and food insecurity.
Martins PA, de Nascimento C, Tucker KL, Roberts SB. J Nutr 2003;133:2117–8.
Energy expenditure of stunted and nonstunted boys and 23. Caballero B. A nutrition paradox—underweight
girls living in the shantytowns of Sao Paulo, Brazil. Am and obesity in developing countries. N Engl J Med
J Clin Nutr 2000;72:1025–31. 2005;352:1514–6.
12. Hoffman DJ, Roberts SB, Verreschi I, Martins PA, de 24. Popkin BM, Gordon-Larsen P. The nutrition transition:
Nascimento C, Tucker KL, Sawaya AL. Regulation of Worldwide obesity dynamics and their determinants. Int
energy intake may be impaired in nutritionally stunted J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2004;28 Suppl 3:S2–9.
children from the shantytowns of Sao Paulo, Brazil. J 25. Garrett JL, Ruel MT. Stunted child-overweight mother
Nutr 2000;130:2265–70. pairs: Prevalence and association with economic devel-
13. WHO Global Database on Child Growth and Malnu- opment and urbanization. Food Nutr Bull 2005;26:
trition. Available at: www.who.int/nutgrowthdb/en/. 209–21.