Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Problems
The following data pertains to Rainbow Corporation‟s investments in marketable securities:
Market Value
Cost 12/31/07 12/31/06
Trading P 150,000 P 155,000 P 100,000
Available-for-sale 150,000 130,000 126,000
Questions
1. What amount should Rainbow Corporation report as unrealized holding gain in its
2007 income statement?
a. P 65,000 b. P 60,000 c. P 55,000 d. P 50,000
At December 31, 2007, Maria Angela Corporation had the following investments that were
purchased during 2005, its first year of operations:
No investments were sold during 2007. All securities except Security D and Security F are
considered short-term investments. None of the market changes is considered permanent.
Questions
3. The amount of investment to be reported as current assets is:
a. P 2,465,000 b. P 2,455,000 c. P 2,380,000 d. P 1,485,000
5. The unrealized gain (or loss) component of income before taxes is:
a. P 15,000 b. P 75,000 c. P 97,000 d. P 100,000
Marc Corporation had investments in marketable debt securities costing P650,000 that were
classified as available-for-sale. On June 30, 2007, Marc Corporation decided to hold the
investments to maturity and accordingly reclassified them from the held-to-maturity
category on that date. The investments‟ market value was P575,000 at December 31,
2006; P530,000 at June 30, 2007; and P490,000 at December 31, 2007.
Questions
3. What amount of loss from investments should Marc Corporation report in its 2007
income statement?
a. P 0 b. P 45,000 c. P 85,000 d. P 120,000
4. What amount should Marc Corporation report as net unrealized loss on marketable
debt securities in its 2007 statement of stockholders‟ equity?
b. P 160,000 b. P 120,000 c. P 45,000 d. P40,000
At December 31, 2006, ABARCA SUGAR CORPORATION properly reported as trading the
following equity securities:
Cost Market
Shan Lily Co., 1,000 shares, P2.40
convertible preferred stock 40,000 42,000
Azenith Corp., 6,000 shares of common 60,000 66,000
Ronette Co., 2,000 shares of common 55,000 40,000
January 18 - sold 2,500 shares of Azenith Corporation for P13 per share.
June 1 - sold 500 shares of Ronette Company, after a 10% stock dividend was
received, for P21 per share.
October 1 - converted 500 shares of Shan Lily Company‟s preferred stock into
1,500 shares of Shan Lily‟s common stock, when the market price was P60 per share
for the preferred stock and P21 per share for the common stock. The conversion has no
economic substance.
The following 2007 dividend information pertains to stock owned by ABARCA SUGAR:
February 14 - Ronette issued a 10% stock dividend, when the market price of
Ronette‟s common stock was P22 per share.
April 5 and October 5 - Shan Lily paid dividends of P1.20 per share on its P2.40
preferred stock, to stockholder of record on March 9 and September 9, respectively.
Shan Lily did not pay dividends on its common stock during 2007.
June 30 - Azenith paid a P1.00 per share dividend on its common stock.
March 1, June 1, September 1, and December 1 - Nagasaki paid quarterly
dividends of P0.50 per share on cash of these dates. Nagasaki‟s net income for the
year ended December 31, 2007 was P1,200,000.
At December 31, 2007, ABARCA SUGAR‟s management intended to hold Nagasaki‟s stock
on a long term basis with the remaining investments considered temporary. Market prices
per share of the marketable equity securities were as follows:
12/31/07 12/31/06
All of the foregoing stocks are listed on major stock exchanges. Declines in market value
from cost would not be considered permanent.
5. The cost per share of Shan Lily preferred at December 31, 2007 is:
a. P 13.33 b. P 20.00 c. P 40.00 d. P 60.00
6. The adjusted balance of Shan Lily preferred (cost) at December 31, 2007 is:
b. P 20,000 b. P 28,000 c. P 30,000 d. P 50,000
7. The number of shares acquired by ABARCA SUGAR through conversion of Shan Lily
stock is:
c. 300 b. 500 c. 1,500 d. 3,000
8. The adjusted balance of Azenith common (cost) at December 31, 2007 is:
d. P 60,000 b. P 37,273 c. P 35,000 d. P 27,500
10. The adjusted balance of Ronette common (cost) at December 31, 2007 is:
f. P 55,000 b. P 46,900 c. P 42,500 d. P 41,250
11. The adjusted balance of Nagasaki common (cost) at December 31, 2007 is:
g. P 1,845,000 b. P 1,860,000 c. P 1,700,000 d. P 1,545,000
12. The total dividend income of ABARCA SUGAR at December 31, 2007 is:
h. P 8,400 b. P 5,900 c. P 5,300 d. P 0
13. The total income from investment of ABARCA SUGAR from Nagasaki at December
31, 2007 is:
i. P 145,000 b. P 160,000 c. P 345,000 d. P 360,000
14. ABARCA SUGAR‟s income statement at December 31, 2007 will report a:
j. No unrealized gain/loss in market decline.
k. P7,000 unrealized loss in market decline.
l. P7,000 unrealized gain in market decline.
m. P23,400 unrealized gain in market recovery.
During 2006, Marlisa Company purchased marketable equity securities as trading securities.
At December 31, 2006, the balance in the allowance to reduce marketable equity securities
to market was P23,000. Pertinent information at December 31, 2007 is as follows:
On January 1, 2007, Marlisa Company paid P700,000 for 100,000 shares of Louie Company
representing 30% of Louie‟s outstanding common stock. The following computations was
made by Marlisa Company:
Purchase price P 700,000
30% equity in book value of Louie‟s net
assets 500,000
Excess of cost over book value P 200,000
The excess cost over book value was attributed to goodwill. Louie reported net income for
the year ended December 31, 2007 of P300,000. Louie Company paid cash dividends of
P100,000 on July 1, 2007. As of December 31, 2007 Marlisa reported, in its balance sheet,
a P700,000 balance of an Investment of Louie Stocks.
25. Marlisa Company‟s December 31, 2007 balance sheet should report the marketable
equity securities at:
a. P 427,000 b. P 412,000 c. P 410,000 d. P 402,000
27. If Marlisa Company exercised significant influence over Louie Company, the amount
of net investment revenue Marlisa Company should report from its investment in Louie
would be
a. P 30,000 b. P 80,000 c. P 90,000 d. P 110,000
28. If Marlisa Company exercised significant influence over Louie Company, the carrying
value of its investment in Louie at December 31, 2007 would be
a. P 810,000 b. P 780,000 c. P 760,000 d. P 750,000
29. If Marlisa Company did not exercise significant influence over Louie Company and
properly accounted for the long-term, investment under the cost method. The amount
of net investment revenue Marlisa Company should report from its investment in Louie
would be
a. P 30,000 b. P 80,000 c. P 90,000 d. P 110,000
30. If Marlisa Company did not exercise significant influence over Louie Company and
properly accounted for the long-term investment under the cost method, the carrying
value of its investment in Louie at December 31, 2007 would be
a. P 780,000 b. P 750,000 c. P 700,000 d. P 500,000