We have already addressed this passage in regard to God’s omnibenevolence,38 and
few verses are more misused by extreme Calvinists (especially those who hold to double- predestination).39 First, again, God is not speaking about the individual Jacob but the nation of Jacob (Israel). In Genesis, when the prophecy was given (25:23 NKJV), Rebekah was told, “Two nations are in your womb, two peoples shall be separated from your body … and the older shall serve the younger.” The reference is not to individual election but to the corporate election of the chosen nation (Israel). Second, despite the corporate election of the Israelite nation, each individual had to accept the Messiah, by faith, to receive God’s salvation (cf. Rom. 11:20). Paul said, “I could wish that I myself were cursed and cut off from Christ for the sake of my brothers, those of my own race, the people of Israel” (Rom. 9:3–4; cf. 10:1). Third, God’s “love” for Jacob and “hate” for Esau is directed to the nations of Jacob (Israel) and Esau (Edom). What is more, Paul, in Romans 9:13, is speaking of them not before they were born (c. 2000 B.C.) but long after they lived—the citation is not from Genesis but from Malachi 1:2–3 (c. 400 B.C.). The deeds of the evil Edomites, perpetrated upon the Israelites, are well documented (e.g., Numbers 20), and even though it was for these actions that God “hated” them as a nation, Scripture does not teach that no Edomites would be saved. In fact, the Bible says there were believers from both Edom (cf. Amos 9:12) and the neighboring country of Moab (cf. Ruth 1), as there will be people in heaven from every tribe, kindred, nation, and tongue (Rev. 7:9). Fourth, the word translated into English as hated means “loved less.”40 To reillustrate, Scripture says that Jacob “loved also Rachel more than Leah.… And when the LORD saw that Leah was hated…” (Gen. 29:30–31 KJV).41 Similarly, Jesus said, “If anyone comes to me and does not hate his father and mother … he cannot be my disciple” (Luke 14:26).42 A parallel idea is expressed in Matthew 10:37: “Anyone who loves his father or mother more than me is not worthy of me.” Fifth, and finally, the statement “I will have mercy on whom I have mercy” (Rom. 9:15; cf. Ex. 33:19) should be understood as intensive, not limiting. That is, the emphasis is on the intensity of the merciful action, not on the limits of its object. Clearly God loves all (cf. John 3:16; 1 John 2:2; 1 Tim. 2:4) and even “bore with great patience the objects of his wrath” (Rom. 9:22), waiting for them to repent (2 Peter 3:9). Romans 9, then, does not teach that God hates the non-elect (or even that He does not love them) but instead that His love for those who do receive salvation is so amazing—so splendid, so magnificent—that His love for those who reject it looks like hatred by comparison. The same loving stroke that makes a kitten purr seems like an expression of hatred if she turns the opposite direction and finds that her fur is being rubbed the wrong way. God’s expressed love is the same for both believer and unbeliever: The believer is already experiencing God’s love, while the Lord is patiently waiting for the unbeliever to repent (i.e., to turn his life in th