Evaluation of Teaching Demonstration

Candidate Name _______________________________ Date__________________________

Strong Good Fair Weak

Evaluation Criteria Remarks
(20-16) (15-11) (10-5) (4-0)
Preparation of the candidate

Dress, neatness and appearance.

Oral communication
 Speaks clearly and comprehensible
 Engaging discussion with students
Used words and expressions within
the student level of understanding
Physical presence
 Avoid distracting mannerisms and
gestures
 Engaging eye contact
Class management
Was there any element of creativity
(by way of certain examples)
Writing on the board, figures /
diagrams (visual aids)
Handling of student questions or
comments
Purpose of the presentation was
clearly presented and clear to the
students
Apparent knowledge/ mastery of the
subject matter
Ability to hold the attention of
students
Showed dynamism and enthusiasm
Conclusion / summarization made; or
lecture abruptly ended
Confidence level exhibited

Time management
Demonstrates strategies to be
inclusive toward students

The information listed above is a matter of opinion. The numerical ratings are intended to be used only as a
general guide. A high numerical score does not imply the candidate is the best candidate.

Evaluator’s Signature ____________________________________________________

Evaluator’s Name ____________________________________________________________________