Standard Method of Test
Effect of Organic Impurities in Fine Aggregate on Strength of Mortar
1. SCOPE.
1.1 This test method covers the de
termination of the effect on morta
strength of the organic impurities in fine
aggregate, whose presence is indicated
by tesis with T 21. Comparison is made
between compressive strengths of mortar
made with washed and unwashed fine ag
1.2. The values stated in ST units are
to be regarded as the Standard
This strength may involve haz:
ardous materials, operations, and equip.
ment. This standard does not purport
to address all of the safety problems
associated with its use. Its the responsi
bility of whoever uses this standard to
consult and establish appropriate safety
and health practices and determine the
applicability of regulatory limitations
Prior to use,
2. REFERENCED DOCUMENTS.
2. AASHTO Standards
M6 Concrete Aggregates
M85_ Portland Cement
M 152: Flow Table for Use in
‘Tests of Hydraulic
Cement
Balances Used in the
Testing of Materials
Sampling Aggregates
Organic Impurities in
Fine Aggregates for
Concrete
Specific Gravity and
Absorption of Fine
Aggregate
T 8
66
AASHTO DESIGNATION: T 71-93!
(ASTM DESIGNATION: C 87-83)
Compressive Strength
of Hydraulic Cement
Mortars (Using 50-
mm or 2-in, Cube
Specimens)
Mechanical Mixing of
Hydraulic Cement
Pastes and Mortars of
Plastic Consistency
Reducing Field Sam-
ples of Aggregate to
Testing Size
22. ASTM Standard:
C670 Preparing Precision
Statements for Test
Methods for Con:
struetion Materials
T 162
Ts
3. SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
341 This test method is of signif
cance in making a final determination
of the acceptability of fine aggregates
with respect to the requirements of
AASHTO M 6 concerning organic impu
3.2. This test method is only applica
bie to those samples which, when tested
in accordance with T 21, have produced
4 supematant liquid with a color darker
than that of the reference standard
color solution,
4. BASIS FOR COMPARISON
4.1. The fine aggregate shall be com:
pared in mortar, as described in this test
‘method, with a sample ofthe same agere
Bale that has been washed in a 3 percent
solution of sodium hydroxide followed
by thorough rinsing in water. The wash
ing shall be repeated a sufficient number
of times until the supernatant liquid ob
tained in T 21 has a color lighter than
standard (Note 1). The washing shall be
performed in such a way as to minimize
the loss of fines and so that the washed
sggregate has a fineness modulus within
0.10 of that of the unwashed aggregate.
‘The washed and rinsed aggregate shall
bbe checked with a suitable indicator such
as phenolphthalein or litmus to assure
that sodium hydroxide has been removed
effectively prior 10 preparation of the
mortar.
42. Unless otherwise specified or
permitted, strength comparisons shall be
made at 7 days in accordance with the
following conditions:
42.1 Mix three batches of mortar
with the aggregate washed in sodium
hydroxide and three batches with the
tunwashed aggregate on the same day.
Al batches shall have the same quantity
of fine aggregate. Mix the batches for
the two conditions alternately
422 Mold three 50-mm or
cubes from each batch,
42.3 Test the three cubes from each
batch at the age specified.
NOTE 1721 describes a standard proce.
dure and an alternative procedure for the
determination of color value. Ia the standard
procedure there isa single reference standard
color. In the allemative procedure five-col
‘red glass standards are used. The reference
sMandard color is equivalent to color Plate
Nod
5S. SAMPLING
5.1 Sample portions of fine aggre
gate for this test shall be obtained from
the same sample used for T 21, Needed
reduction of samples to obtain test por-
tions shall be in accordance with T 248.
5.2 Secure an additional field sample
if needed from the aggregate supply in
accordance with T 2.tm
METHODS OF SAMPLING AND TESTING
6
6, REAGENTS AND
MATERIALS
61. Portland cement shall be Type 1
or Type II, meeting the requirements of
AASHTO M 85.
62 Sodium Hydroxide Solution (3
percent)—Dissolve 3 parts by mass of
sodium hydroxide (NaOH) in 97 pars
water,
APPARATUS.
7 Flow Table, Flow Mold, and
Caliper, as described in AASHTO M
152.
72 Tamper, Trowel, Cube Molds,
‘and Testing Machine, as described in
AASHTO T 106.
13 Mixer, Bowl, and Paddle, as de-
scribed in T 162.
74 Balance, conforming to AASHTO
M231 for Class G5.
8, TEMPERATURE
8.1 The temperature of the mixing
‘water, moist closet, and storage tank shall
be maintained at 230 + 1.7C (73.4
+38),
9. PREPARATION OF MORTAR
9.1 In the event that the fine aggre-
‘gate being used includes particles so
large that the adjustment bracket (as de
scribed in T 162) cannot provide ade-
quate clearance, the oversized particles
shall be removed by sieving on the 4.75.
mm (No. 4) or 2.36-mm (No. 8) sieve
If this procedure is employed, the report
shall so state and shall indicate the per:
centage of material so removed
NOTE 2—Cantion: The clearances be:
tween the paddle and the bowl specified in
TT 162 are suitable when using the Standard
‘mortar made with Onawa Sand, To permit the
rixer to operate freely and to avoid serious
damage to the paddle and bowl when coarser
aggregates are used, it may be necessary to set,
the clearance adjustment bracket to provide
sreater clearances than specified. A clearance
Of approximately 4.0 mm is equiced in T
162; a clearance of approximately £0 mm
fas been found to be satisfactory for this
method when used with fine aggregate from
which the material retained on the 4:75-mm
sieve has been removed
9.2. Use water and cement in quanti
ties thac will yield a water-cement ratio
fof 0.6 by niass. It has been found that
(600 ¢ of cement and 360 mL. of water
will usually be adequate for a 6-cube
batch.
NOTE 3Use of cement, water, and an
appropriate amount of aggregate for a 6-cube
batch, or larger, is recommended to assure
uniform mixing of the moras
93. Using fine aggregate that has
been brought to a saturated surface dry
condition as described in T 84, prepare
a quantity of aggregate estimated to pro-
vide slightly more than needed to pro-
duce a batch of the desired consistency.
NOTE 4 the absorption has been deter:
‘mined in accordance with T 84, the aggregate
may be prepared for test by adding toa known
mass of dry aggregate the amount of water
it will absorb, mixing thoroughly, and permit-
ting the aggregate to stand in a covered pan
for 60 minutes before use. The washed and
unwashed aggregate may be presumed to have
the same absorption
NOTE 5—The mass ofthe prepared aggre:
fate should be determined so thatthe amount
fetually used in a batch may be calculated
f= described in Section 10.1.3. Experience
indicates that the quantity of fine agaregate
‘used in a Grcube batch will range from ap-
proximately 1200 g for fine-graded material
{0 approximately 2200 g for coarse-graded
rater
9.3.1 The mortar shall be propor-
tioned to produce a consistency of 100
* 5 in 25 drops of the flow table, as
determined by the flow test described in
T 106.
914. Prepare the mortar in a mechani-
cal mixer in accordance with the proce-
dure for mixing mortars described in T
162, as modified below.
NOTE 6—Unwashed ageregat should be
‘used in the mital batch, so that washed aggre:
gate is not wasted in case the batch must
be discarded
9.4.1 During the period from 30 to
60 seconds from the start of mixing, and
while still mixing at slow speed, slowly
add a measured quantity of aggregate
estimated to provide the proper consis-
tency.
942 During the final 1 minute of
mixing at medium speed, if the flow
appears to be too high additional aggre~
gale may be added after the first 30
seconds ofthis mixing period. To do so,
stop the mixer briefly, add the aggregate,
and then complete the additional 30 sec-
fonds of mixing
10. PROCEDURE
10.1 Make a determination of the
flow as described in T 106.
10.1.1 Should the flow be too great,
return the mortar to the mixing bowl,
add additional aggregate, mix for 30 sec~
conds at medium speed, and make another
determination of the flow. If more than
two tials must be made to obtain a flow
of 100 * 5, consider the mortar as
tial mortar, and prepare test specimens
from a new batch,
10.1.2 If the mortar is too dry, dis
card the batch,
10.13 Determine the quantity of ag~
‘regate used by subtracting the mass of
the ponion remaining after mixing from
the mass of the initial sample. Use this
quantity of aggregate in all subsequent
batches for the aggregate under test
10.2 Molding Test Specimens—
Immediately following completion of
flow test indicating acceptable consis-
tency, retum the mortar from the flow
table to the mixing bowl, scrape down
the howl, and then remix the entire batch
15 seconds at medium speed, Upon com-
pletion of mixing, shake the excess mor
tar from the paddle into the bowl. Place
the mortar in cube molds in two layers
in accordance with the procedures de-
seribed in T 106.
10.3 For subsequent batches, use
washed and unwashed aggregate alter-
nately and the quantity of aggregate de
termined in Section 10.1.3. Follow the
procedure for mixing mortars described
in T 162. Following the final 1-minute
mixing in T 162, do not perform a flow
{est but instead allow the mortar to stand
in the mixing bowl 90 sec without cov
ering. During the last 15 seconds of this
interval, quickly scrape down into the
batch any mortar that may have collected68
fon the side of the bowl Then remix
for 15 seconds at medium speed. Upon
‘completion of mixing, shake the excess
mortar from the paddle into the mixing
bowl. Place the mortar inthe cube molds
in two layers in accordance with the
procedure described in T 106.
104 Store the test specimens and
determine compressive strength in accor-
dance with T 106.
11, CALCULATION AND
REPORT
ALA Calculate the compressive
strength of each specimen by dividing
the maximum load it carried during the
test by the cross-sectional area. Average
the strengths of the three specimens from
‘each batch, Calculate three-strength ra-
METHODS OF SAMPLING AND TESTING.
tios by dividing the average strength for
fa batch containing unwashed aggregate
by the average strength for the corre-
sponding (in respective order of mixing)
Datch containing washed aggregate
11.2 Report the average of the three
ratios, expressed as a percentage, as the
relative strength for the aggregate un-
der test
113 If oversized material was re
moved from the sample as provided in
Section 9.1, report the quantity and the
sieve size on which it was retained
12. PRECISION AND BIAS
12.1 The following precision state
ment is applicable when a test result is
the average ratio, as defined by this test
‘method, of three pairs of mortar batch
strength tests with all the batches mixed
fon the same day and tested at the
same age
T7
12.2 The single laboratory coeffi-
cient of variation has been determined
to be 5.4 percent (Note 7). Therefore,
results of two properly conducted tests
in the same laboratory should not differ
from each other by more than 15.3 per-
cent (Note 7) oftheir average. The maxi-
‘mum range (difference between highest
and lowest) of the three individual ratios
used in calculating the average should
not exceed 17 percent (Note 8).
NOTE 7—These numbers represent, re
spectively, the (18 percent) and (D28 percent)
Timits as described in ASTM C 670.
NOTE 8—Calculated as described in the
section on precision of individual measure
ments averaged to obtain a test result in
ASTM C 670,