MAPANCalibration

- Journal ofof Special Relative

Metrology Society Humidity and23,
of India, Vol. Temperature
No. 2, 2008;(RHT) ......................Measurement
pp. 115-121

Calibration of Special Relative Humidity and

Temperature (RHT) Sensors and Evaluation and
Expression of Uncertainty in the Measurement

BHIKHAM SINGH, HARI KISHAN* and Y. P. SINGH

National Physical Laboratory (NPLI), CSIR

New Delhi - 110 012, India
*e-mail : hkishan@mail.nplindia.ernet.in

[Received : 06.03.2007 ; Revised : 07.01.2008 ; Accepted : 29.05.2008]

Abstract
This paper reports the calibration of special type of relative humidity and temperature sensor, which
gives the output in terms of millivolts, measured by precision digital multimeter (DMM) to further
estimation of relative humidity in the range of 25 %RH to 95 %RH. The sensor has been calibrated
against the standard aspirated psychrometer having a pair of matched dry and wet bulb quartz
thermometers. The temperature of wet bulb thermometer is effectively depressed when a ventilated
airflow is maintained at a speed more than 3 metre/second. The relative humidity of reference standard
psychrometer is computed using psychrometric equation to relate with the output of the RH indicator
under comparison. The paper also describes the details of estimation and expression of expanded
uncertainty in the calibration of the sensor at measured relative humidity. A sufficient number of data
were undertaken to evaluate the uncertainty at a confidence-level of approximately 95% for a normal
probability distribution.

1. Introduction standard of humidity against which other methods

The measurement and control of relative humidity
plays a significant role in industry, including various
sectors such as electrical, pharmaceutical, textile, food
and aerospace. Its need is increasing day by day with
the modernization of industries and awareness of
quality system in regard to ISO 9000. This awareness
has led to the industries for getting their RH indicators
calibrated against the National Humidity Standard.
The gravimetric method of water vapour measurement
is considered the most precise and accurate. This
method permits the measurement of the amount of
water vapour in a given mass of the moist gas sample.
The quantities measured in this method are
fundamental; it gives an absolute measure of humidity.
Hence the gravimetric method is used as a primary
© Metrology Society of India, All rights reserved.
are compared. The National Institute of Standards
and Technology (NIST), USA, National Physical
Laboratory (NPL), UK, Physikalisch-Technische
Bundesanstalt (PTB), Germany, National Metrology
Institute of Japan (NMIJ), Japan and Korea Research
Institute of Standards and Science (KRISS), Republic
of Korea use gravimetric method [1-6]. Various other
techniques such as two-pressure, two-temperature,
two pressure-two temperature, mixed flow and
aspirated psychrometer [7-11] are used as the
secondary humidity standards. At NPL, India an
aspirated psychrometric technique has been
established [12-14] as the reference humidity
standard. No measurement is complete without
assigning the value of uncertainty to it. The detailed
study of the uncertainty associated with the
measurement has been evaluated and discussed

115
 Bhikham Singh, Hari Kishan and Y. P. Singh
[15-20] as per the GUM/ISO/IEC: 17025 documents.
2. Experimental Setup
The following instruments are required to be used
for calibration of RHT Sensor:
1. Digital indicator (Testo 781) with Quartz
thermometers (dry and wet bulb) and PC adapter
2. Environmental chamber Gallenkamp Make
(model OVR-403-010L).
3. Anemometer with probe model AM-4201, make
LT Lutron Sr.No.480014.
4. Mini/small high-speed fan 4.5" size operated at
220-230 volts ac supply.
5. Digital pressure indicator, Model Druck DPI-145
6. Temperature & Humidity Indicator, Make
Indosaw.
7. Special Relative Humidity Sensor under
calibration with digital multi-meter.
3. Calibration Procedure
The calibration setup for RH measurements for
computing the RH is based on measuring the dry &
wet bulb temperatures with the help of two matched,
precision quartz thermometers (Model TESTO 781).
These thermometers, having a resolution of 0.001 C,
have been periodically calibrated against the standard
PRT of the National Physical Laboratory, New Delhi
and are found to be reproducible within ± 0.005 ºC.
The expanded uncertainties of both the thermometers
have been calculated and estimated to be within
± 0.03 ºC for the coverage factor, k = 2, at a level of
confidence 95 % approximately. These two quartz
thermometers are supported on stands very near to
each other. One of these is provided with a clean wick,
immersed in distilled water in a Pyrex bottle. A small
fan is placed near to the thermometers blowing air at
a speed of >3 metre/second. The use of new wick
over the wet bulb thermometer ensures the effect on
radiation interchange between the bulbs due to
airflow. An anemometer measures the speed of air.
The entire setup (i.e. the quartz thermometers along
with fan) is then placed inside the Gallenkamp
environmental chamber (Model OVR-403-010L). The
environmental chamber is a stainless steel cabinet
with glazed door. The basic temperature and humidity
116
control equipment comprises dry and wet bulb contact
thermometers together with an air heater, a boiler, a
fan, window heater, and a spray cooler. This
environmental chamber is being used to generate RH
of different levels while the quartz thermometers carry
out the measurements. The Quartz thermometers and
pressure indicator DPI 145 are hooked on to a suitable
compatible computer, which collects the data every
second/minute of the two thermometers and pressure
sensor in a file.
The RHT sensor is kept very near to the aspirated
psychrometer and the readings of the RHT sensor in
millivolt/volt are recorded manually at a regular
interval of time at the calibration temperature 24 ºC ±
1 ºC. The reference humidity standard (an aspirated
psychrometer as described above) has an expanded
uncertainty of ±1% RH at a confidence level
approximately 95 % coverage factor k=2 with normal
probability distribution [14]. Fig. 1 shows the
schematic block diagram of the entire experimental
set-up used for the calibration of RHT sensors/
hygrometers (dial and digital type). A program (in
C++ language) reads the data and computes mean
value of relative humidity (RH) and the standard
uncertainty with the help of the software. The
evaluation of uncertainty is also checked by manual
calculation in order to validate the software used. The
relative humidity of reference standard is evaluated
by using the following psychrometric equations
[11-14].
(%) RH = 100 x [Pd/Psd] (1)
where
Psd = Saturation vapour pressure of water vapour at
the dry bulb temperature (td)
Pd = Vapour pressure of water vapour at dry bulb
temperature (td)
Pd = Psw - AP (td -tw) (2)
where
td = dry-bulb temperature (ºC)
tw = wet-bulb temperature ( ºC)
(td - tw) = depression (ºC)
Psw = Saturation vapour pressure of water vapour
at the wet bulb temperature (tw)
 Calibration of Special Relative Humidity and Temperature (RHT) ......................Measurement

Fig. 1. Schematic diagram of the experimental setup for calibration of RHT sensor

A = Psychrometric constant, 0.000666 / ºC for 4.1 Mathematical Model

moving air
The following mathematical model is expressed
P = Total atmospheric pressure on the basis of various components of uncertainty for
RH measurement in % for the calibration.
Substituting the value of Pd from Eq. (2) in Eq. (1), we
get RH(meas) = RH(S) ± ΔRH (4)
(%) RH = 100 x [Psw - AP (td -tw)]/[ Psd ] (3) ΔRH = U(RH) (5)
U(RH) = k x uc(RH) (6)
4. Evaluation of Uncertainty
uc(RH) = √[u12 δRH(S)+ u22 δRH(C)+ u32 δRH(A)+u42
In our experiment, the uncertainty of measurement δRH(P)+ u52 δRH(D)+u62 δRH(R)+u72
associated with the input estimates is evaluated by δRH(RO)+ u82 δ RH(DVM)+u92 δRH(Rep)]
'Type-A' method of evaluation. The Type-A evaluation (7)
of standard uncertainty is performed by the statistical where
analysis of a series of observations. The Type-B
evaluation of standard uncertainty is the method of u1 [δRH(S)] = Standard uncertainty component
evaluating the uncertainty by means other than the of Reference Standard Aspirated
statistical analysis of a series of observations. In this psychrometer
case the evaluation of the standard uncertainty is
u2 [δRH(C)] = Standard Uncertainty due to
based on some other scientific knowledge. The various environmental Chamber
sources of uncertainty have been identified and
described in a mathematical model. The mathematical u3 [δRH(A)] = Standard Uncertainty due to
model has been formed to include the various error Anemometer
components affecting the measurement and contribute
u4 [δRH(P)] = Standard Uncertainty component
towards the uncertainty in the calibration. Some of
due to Pressure Indicator/Sensor
the components are already included in the
uncertainty due to standard reference RH u5 [δRH(D)] = Standard Uncertainty component
Standard. due to Drift of Reference Standard

117
 Bhikham Singh, Hari Kishan and Y. P. Singh

u6 [δRH(R)] = Standard Uncertainty component Referring to the data in Table 1, calculation of

due to resolution of DUC uncertainty (Type-A) was estimated as;

u7 [δRH(RO)] = Standard Uncertainty component ua = 0.062272 % RH

due to rounding off significant
digit
u8 [δRH(DVM)]= Standard Uncertainty component
due to DVM/DMM used
u9 [δRH(Rep)] = Standard Uncertainty due to
Standard deviation of the Data on
DUC.
uc(RH) = √Σ[δf(RH)/δxi (RH)] 2ui2(RH)
Sensitivity Coefficients 'c i' = δf(RH)/δxi (RH) =
(1x 102 %RH/V)
The components of uncertainty due to
anemometer and pressure indicator are included in
the uncertainty contribution of the reference RH
standard.
4.2 Evaluation of Type 'A' Component of Uncertainty
(ua) at 50% RH
Besides observations of the reference humidity
standard, we also note down simultaneously the
readings of RHT sensor as shown in the digital multi-
meter (DMM) display of the special sensor (which is
to be calibrated). Table 1 shows some of the typical
observations of RHT sensor in Volts/milli Volts in
(DMM) under calibration. It is a set of 10 observations.
4.3 Evaluation of Type 'B' Components of Uncertainty,
(uiB)
4.3.1 Uncertainty contribution due to reference
standard (an aspirated psychrometer)
The reference standard is calibrated and traceable
to the national standard of temperature and
pressure. The expanded uncertainty of the
reference standard is ± 1% RH at approximately
95% confidence level with coverage factor k = 2
for a normal probability distribution. Thus the
standard uncertainty, u1 is obtained by dividing
the expanded uncertainty by coverage factor,
therefore, u1 = 1 % RH/2 = 0.5 % RH, Sensitivity
coefficient c1=1, Degree of freedom, ν1 = ∞.
4.3.2 Uncertainty contribution due to the stability
and uniformity of the environmental chamber
Based on our measurements of uniformity and
stability inside the humidity oven, the maximum
variation in RH from one corner to the other is
found to be 1.465 % giving a limiting value of ±
0.7325 % RH. Assuming rectangular probability
distribution, the standard uncertainty, u2 = 0.7325
% /√3 ≅ 0.423 % RH, Sensitivity coefficient,
c2=1,Degree of freedom, ν2 = ∞.

Table 1
Observation
S.No. RH % of DUC reading Deviation from (Vi-Vavg )2
Ref. Std Vi, in Volts average in V, (Vi-Vavg) in volts

1 50.951 0.510 3.1 x 10-3 9.61 x 10-6

2 50.862 0.509 2.1 x 10-3 4.41 x 10-6
3 50.861 0.507 1 x 10-4 1 x 10-8
4 50.922 0.508 1.1 x 10-3 1.21 x 10-6
5 50.892 0.507 1 x 10-4 1 x 10-8
6 50.928 0.507 1 x 10-4 1 x 10-8
7 51.010 0.507 1 x 10-4 1 x 10-8
8 50.650 0.506 -9 x 10-4 8.1 x 10-7
9 50.314 0.505 -1.9 x 10-3 3.61 x 10-6
10 50.240 0.503 -3.9 x 10-3 1.521 x 10-5
Mean 50.763 % RH Vavg = 0.5069 Σ = 3.49 x 10-5

118
 Calibration of Special Relative Humidity and Temperature (RHT) ......................Measurement

4.3.3 Uncertainty contribution due to the resolution
of the Device Under Calibration
The resolution of RHT sensor in digital multi
meter (DMM) is 0.00001V. This gives a voltage
resolution limit of ± 5x10 -6 V. Assuming
rectangular probability distribution, the standard
uncertainty u3 is u3 = 5x10-6V /√3 = 2.8867513x
10-6 V, Sensitivity coefficient, c3 = 1x 102 %RH/V,
u3 = 2.8867513x10-4 % RH, Degree of freedom,
ν3 = ∞.
distribution = ± 0.07/√3 = 0.04041 % RH,
Sensitivity coefficient, c5= 1, Degree of freedom, ν5
= ∞, u5=0.04041% RH.
4.4 Combined Standard Uncertainty, uc
The combined uncertainty uc(y) in output estimate
is equal to root sum square (RSS) of all contributions
discussed above
uc 2 = Σci2ui2 = 0.6602498 %RH (8)

4.3.4 Uncertainty due to drift of the standard RH 4.5 Effective Degree of Freedom

Drift caused in the Reference Standard in the years
2004-06 = 0.06686 % RH, standard. Uncertainty
limit = ± 0.06686/√3=0.0386%RH.Assuming
rectangular probability distribution. Sensitivity
coefficient, c4 = 1, Degree of freedom, ν4 = ∞, u4
= 0.0386 % RH.
The effective degree of freedom (νeff) of combined
standard uncertainty is calculated using the well
known Welch-Satterthwaite equation given as
following:
νeff = [uc(RH)]4/[ui(RH)4/νi] = 113738 ∞ (9)

4.3.5 Uncertainty due to rounding off significant digits/
decimal places
Limiting value of RH for significant digits =
± 0.07. Assuming rectangular probability
4.6 Expanded Uncertainty, U
For effective degree of freedom, νeff ≅ ∞ at 95.45%,
level of confidence, the 't' factor from student's 't' table
is 2, so the coverage factor 'k' =2.

Uncertainty Budget
Source of Estimated Std. Probability Sensitivity Uncertainty Degree
Uncertainty Value Uncertainty Distribution Coefficient Contribution of
Divisor ci (% RH) Freedom
(a) (b) (c) (d) f = (b/c).d

u1 (Ref. Std.) 50.69 % RH ±1 Normal Type B, 2 1 0.5 ∞

u2 (Hum. Oven) - ±0.7325 Rectangular Type B, √3 1 0.423 ∞

u3 (Resolution) - 5x10-6 V Rectangular Type B, √3 1 x 102 % 2.8867513x10-4 ∞

RH /V
u4 (Drift) - 0.06686 Rectangular Type B, √3 1 0.0386 ∞

u5 (Round off) - 0.07 Rectangular Type B, √3 1 0.04041 ∞

(ua) Repeatability - 0.5069 V Normal Type A, √10 1 x 102% 0.062272 9

1.962074 x 10 -3
RH /V
(uc) Combined - uc = √Σui2 = 0.6602498 % RH 0.6602498 ∞
Uncertainty

(U) 50.69 % RH ≅ ± 1.32 %RH ∞

Expanded νeff = 113737
Uncertainty U = uc x k =1.3204996

119
 Bhikham Singh, Hari Kishan and Y. P. Singh

Calibration Results

S. No. Value of Ref. Value measured in RHT Expanded Uncertainty of

Std. (RH %) measurement, % RH
V RH%

1. 25.25 0.2489 24.89 ± 1.32

2. 50.76 0.5069 50.69 ± 1.32
3. 95.47 0.9261 92.61 ± 1.32

The expanded uncertainty, U Acknowledgement

U = kxuc(RH) = 1.32% RH (10)
5. Results and Discussion
The relative humidity & temperature Sensor
(RHT), which measures the (RH) output in terms of
the electrical potential was calibrated against the
reference RH standard generated in the environmental
chamber. This is an indirect comparison/calibration
of RHT sensor whose output is further evaluated in
RH % using a sensitivity coefficient of 1 x 102% RH /
V. Four numbers of similar sensors have been
compared against the reference RH standard. A case
study has been presented on calibration of one RHT
sensor in the range 25 % RH to 95 % RH. The
measurements have been reported at 25 % RH, 50 %
RH and 95 % RH and associated expanded
uncertainty of calibration has also been evaluated and
expressed under calibration results.
The reported expanded uncertainty of
measurement is stated as the standard uncertainty
estimated at a confidence level of approximately 95%,
k=2, for a normal probability distribution.
6. Conclusion
The RHT sensor undertaken for calibration was
a special sensor device, which gives an output in the
form of an electrical signal in volt to evaluate the
relative humidity (RH%). The sensor needs a high
stability environmental chamber to produce
effectively stable output voltage of the sensor. The
equipment utilized for comparison of such type of
sensor was found to be significantly useful in the
calibration of specialized humidity sensors. These
devices are used in the measurement of wind energy
evaluation. These are frequently required to be
calibrated against the reference standard of humidity
established at NPL, New Delhi.
The authors express their sincere gratitude to
Prof. Vikram Kumar, Director of the National Physical
Laboratory, New Delhi for his constant
encouragement. The help provided by Mr. Shiv Dutt
Sharma is greatly acknowledged.
References
[1] A. Wexler and D.D. Raymond, Pressure
Humidity Apparatus, J. Res. Natl. Bur. Std., 48
(1952) 269.
[2] A. Wexler, Calibration of Humidity-Measuring
Instruments at the National Bureau of
Standards, ISA Transaction, 7 (1968) 356-362.
[3] T. Inamatsu, Establishment of Humidity
Standard in Japan, Bull NRLM, 44 (1995)
107-113.
[4] A.G. Forton and R.F. Pragnell, Development of
Primary Gravimetric Hygrometer for the UK
National Humidity Standard Facility,
Proceedings International Symposium on
Moisture and Humidity, Washington DC,
15-18 April 1985, 229-234.
[5] A Guide to the Measurement of Humidity,
Published by The Institute of Measurement &
Control, London, 1996.
[6] H.S. Nham, KRISS (Republic of Korea) Private
Communication.
[7] A. Wexler and S. Hasegawa, Relative Humidity
-Temperature Relationships of Some Saturated
Salt Solutions in the Temperature Range 0 to
50 C, J. Res. NBS, 53A (1954) 19.
[8] G. Scholz, PTB (Germany) Private
Communication.
[9] M. Heinonen, Measurement, 17 (1996) 183-188.
[10] M. Stevens and S.A. Bell, The NPL Standard

120
 Calibration of Special Relative Humidity and Temperature (RHT) ......................Measurement
Humidity Generator: an Analysis of
Uncertainty by Validation of Individual
Component Performances, Meas. Sci. Technol.,
3 (1992) 943-952.
[11] H. Kishan and B. Singh, Mixed Flow Relative
Humidity Generator, MAPAN- Journal of
Metrology Society of India, 23 (2008) 21-24.
[12] Hari Kishan, Bhikham Singh, V.P. Wasan, R.S.
Khandekar, S.S. Verma and R.G. Sharma,
Development of an Aspirated Psychrometer
using Two Quartz Thermometers, MAPAN-
Journal of Metrology Society of India, 12 (1997)
119-122.
[13] Hari Kishan, NPL (India) Humidity Standard,
Proceedings 3rd International Conference on
Metrology in New Millennium and Global
Trade (MMGT-2001), NPL, New Delhi, 8-10
February 2001, 62-65.
[14] Hari Kishan and Bhikham Singh,
Establishment of the Indian National
Humidity Standard Facility, 4th International
Symposium on Humidity and Moisture, Taipei,
Taiwan, 16-19 September 2002, 566-570.
121
[15] Bhikham Singh and Hari Kishan, Calibration
Proc.No.DP#1.03(Part-C)/Doc.3/CP#01,
Document Manual of Humidity Standards of
National Physical Laboratory, New Delhi.
[16] Hari Kishan, Calibration of Relative Humidity
Indicators and Evaluation of Uncertainty,
NABL News, 41 (2006) 27-32.
[17] Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in
Measurements, International Organization for
Standardization (ISO), First Edition (1995).
[18] Expression of the Uncertainty of Measurement
in Calibration, Published by European
cooperation for Accreditation of Laboratories
(EAL), Reference EAL-4/02, 1999.
[19] NABL-141, Guidelines for Estimation and
Expression of Uncertainty in Measurements,
(2000).
[20] Y.P. Singh, Evaluation and Expression of
Uncertainty in the Calibration of Screw Type
Industrial Lamps Using Photoelectric
Pyrometer, MAPAN- Journal of Metrology
Society of India, 22 (2007) 235-245.