Professional Documents
Culture Documents
com
PART-A
4. What is windowing?
Windowing an OFDM symbol makes the amplitude go smoothly to zero at the symbol
boundaries. A commonly used window type is raised cosine window, which is defines as,
2
www.Vidyarthiplus.com
www.Vidyarthiplus.com
14. What is the disadvantage of distortion techniques & how it will be reduced?
A disadvantage of distortion techniques is that symbols with a large PAP ratio suffer
more degradation, so they are more vulnerable to errors.
3
www.Vidyarthiplus.com
www.Vidyarthiplus.com
21. What are the basic coding rules for generating complementary codes?
1. Interchanging both codes;
2. Reversing and conjugating second code;
3. Phase-rotating second code;
4. Phase-rotating elements of even order in both codes;
5. Phase-rotating first code;
6. Reversing and conjugating first code.
4
www.Vidyarthiplus.com
www.Vidyarthiplus.com
5
www.Vidyarthiplus.com
www.Vidyarthiplus.com
PART-B
6
www.Vidyarthiplus.com
www.Vidyarthiplus.com
7
www.Vidyarthiplus.com
www.Vidyarthiplus.com
8
www.Vidyarthiplus.com
www.Vidyarthiplus.com
9
www.Vidyarthiplus.com
www.Vidyarthiplus.com
10
www.Vidyarthiplus.com
www.Vidyarthiplus.com
11
www.Vidyarthiplus.com
www.Vidyarthiplus.com
12
www.Vidyarthiplus.com
www.Vidyarthiplus.com
13
www.Vidyarthiplus.com
www.Vidyarthiplus.com
14
www.Vidyarthiplus.com
www.Vidyarthiplus.com
15
www.Vidyarthiplus.com
www.Vidyarthiplus.com
16
www.Vidyarthiplus.com
www.Vidyarthiplus.com
17
www.Vidyarthiplus.com
www.Vidyarthiplus.com
18
www.Vidyarthiplus.com
www.Vidyarthiplus.com
19
www.Vidyarthiplus.com
www.Vidyarthiplus.com
BLOCK CODES
20
www.Vidyarthiplus.com
www.Vidyarthiplus.com
CONVOLUTIONAL CODES:
21
www.Vidyarthiplus.com
www.Vidyarthiplus.com
22
www.Vidyarthiplus.com
www.Vidyarthiplus.com
23
www.Vidyarthiplus.com
www.Vidyarthiplus.com
CONCATENATED CODES
24
www.Vidyarthiplus.com
www.Vidyarthiplus.com
INTERLEAVING
25
www.Vidyarthiplus.com
www.Vidyarthiplus.com
26
www.Vidyarthiplus.com
www.Vidyarthiplus.com
27
www.Vidyarthiplus.com
www.Vidyarthiplus.com
28
www.Vidyarthiplus.com
www.Vidyarthiplus.com
Figure 1. CDF of the PAP ratio (PAPR) for a number of SCs of (a) 32, (b) 64, (c) 128, (d)
256, and (e) 1,024. Solid lines are calculated; dotted lines are simulated
In Figure 3, the difference between clipping the signal and windowing the signal can be seen.
Figure 4 shows how increasing the window width can decrease the spectral distortion.
Figure 3.Frequency spectrum of an OFDM signal with 32 SCs with clipping and peak
windowing at a threshold level of 3 dB above the RMS amplitude.
29
www.Vidyarthiplus.com
www.Vidyarthiplus.com
Figure 4.Frequency spectrum of an OFDM signal with 32 SCs with peak windowing at a
threshold level of 3 dB above the RMS amplitude. Symbol length is 128 samples (4 times
oversampled) and window length is (a) 3, (b) 5, (c) 7, (d) 9, (e) 11, (f) 13, and (g) 15 samples.
Curve (h) represents the ideal OFDM spectrum.
Figure 5 shows packet-error ratio (PER) curves with and without clipping, using a rate
1/2 convolution code with constraint length 7. The simulated OFDM signal uses 48 SCs with
16-QAM. The plots demonstrate that nonlinear distortion has only a minor effect on the PER;
the loss in SNR is about 0.25 dB when the PAP ratio is decreased to 6 dB. When peak
windowing is applied, the results are slightly worse (see Figure 6) because peak windowing
distorts a larger part of the signal than clipping for the same PAP ratio.
Figure 5.PER versus Eb/N0 for 64-byte packets in AWGN. OFDM signal is clipped to a PAP
ratio of (a) 16 (no distortion), (b) 6, (c) 5, and (d) 4 dB.
30
www.Vidyarthiplus.com
www.Vidyarthiplus.com
Figure 6.PER versus Eb/N0 for 64-byte packets in AWGN. Peak windowing is applied with a
window width of 1/16 of the FFT duration. The PAP ratio is reduced to (a) 16 (no distortion),
(b) 6, (c) 5, and (d) 4 dB
To simulate a power amplifier, the following model is used for the AM/PM conversion:
Figure 8 shows the output spectra of an undistorted OFDM signal and the spectra of
two distorted signals, assuming a highly linear amplifier model [p = 10 in (6.5)]. The backoff
relative to the maximum output power was determined such that any significant distortion of
the spectrum is at least 50 dB below the in-band spectral density. In this case, peak
windowing gives a gain of almost 3 dB in the required backoff relative to clipping. This
difference in backoff is much smaller than the difference in the PAP ratio at the input of the
power amplifier. Without peak windowing, the PAP ratio is about 18 dB for the OFDM
signal with 64 SCs. With peak windowing, it is reduced to approximately 5 dB. Hence, for
the latter case, it is clear that the backoff of a highly linear amplifier must be slightly above
this 5 dB to achieve a minimal spectral distortion. It is not true, however, that without peak
31
www.Vidyarthiplus.com
www.Vidyarthiplus.com
windowing the backoff must be in the order of 18 dB for the same amount of distortion as
with peak windowing. Because there is little energy in the signal parts that have a relatively
large PAP ratio, distortion in those parts does not affect the spectrum that much. After peak
windowing or any other PAP reduction technique, however, a significant part of the signal
samples are close to the maximum PAP ratio (e.g., 5 dB).
In this case, any distortion that is a decibel or so below this maximum produces more
spectral distortion than clipping the original OFDM signal at 10 dB below its maximum PAP
level, simply because for the latter, a much smaller fraction of the signal is affected. Thus, the
more the PAP ratio is reduced by PAP-reduction techniques, the less tolerant the signal
becomes to nonlinearities in the area of its maximum PAP ratio.
Figure 8. (a) Ideal OFDM spectrum for 64 SCs, (b) spectrum after highly linear amplifier
(Rapp’s parameter p = 10) with 8.7-dB backoff, and (c) spectrum using peak windowing with
5.9-dB backoff.
Figure 9 shows OFDM spectra for a more realistic amplifier model with p = 3. The
target for undesired spectrum distortion has now been set to a less stringent level of 30 dB
below the in-band density. The difference in backoff with and without peak windowing is
now reduced to 1 dB. This demonstrates that the more spectral pollution can be tolerated, the
less gain is achieved with PAP reduction techniques.
Figure 9. (a) Ideal OFDM spectrum for 64 SCs, (b) plain OFDM with 6.3-dB backoff and
Rapp’s parameter p = 3, and (c) peak windowing with 5.3-dB backoff.
32
www.Vidyarthiplus.com
www.Vidyarthiplus.com
Figure 10 shows similar plots as Figure 9, but now for 256 SCs. This demonstrates
that the required backoff with or without peak windowing is almost independent of the
number of SCs, as long as this number is large compared with 1. In fact, the difference in
backoff with and without peak windowing reduces slightly to 0.8 dB by going from 64 to 256
SCs.
Figure 10. (a) Ideal OFDM spectrum for 256 SCs, (b) plain OFDM with 6.3-dB backoff and
Rapp’s parameter p = 3, and (c) peak windowing with 5.5-dB backoff.
33
www.Vidyarthiplus.com
www.Vidyarthiplus.com
SYMBOL SCRAMBLING
34
www.Vidyarthiplus.com
www.Vidyarthiplus.com
35
www.Vidyarthiplus.com
www.Vidyarthiplus.com
36
www.Vidyarthiplus.com
www.Vidyarthiplus.com
37
www.Vidyarthiplus.com
www.Vidyarthiplus.com
38
www.Vidyarthiplus.com
www.Vidyarthiplus.com
39
www.Vidyarthiplus.com