Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Core
Tools
1
Automotive Core Tools
Control Plan
2
Automotive Core Tools
3
Automotive Core Tools
Examples: Other Manuals
4
Core Tools in IATF 16949:2016
APQP: 8.3.2.1
MSA: 7.1.5.1.1
5
APQP
Advanced Product Quality
Planning
6
7
8
APQP
What is it?
Management of product development
9
Advanced Product Quality Planning
CONCEPT
INITIATION/ PROGRAM
APPROVAL APPROVAL
PROTOTYPE PILOT LAUNCH
PLANNING
PLANNING
PRODUCT DESIGN AND DEV.
PRODUCTION
Planning Product
INPUTS Design & Product &
| Dev. INPUTS Process Design Feedback,
Planning & Process Assessment &
| Dev. INPUTS
OUTPUTS Validation Corrective Action
Product | INPUTS INPUTS
Design & Process Design
Dev. | |
OUTPUTS & Product &
Dev. OUTPUTS Feedback,
Process Assessment &
Validation Corrective Action
OUTPUTS OUTPUTS
10
APQP Plan a n d D e fin e Ph a s e
Concept Initiation/Approval
Inputs:
• Voice of the Customer
• Market Research (Including OEM Vehicle Timing and
Volume Expectations
• Historical Warranty and Quality Information
• Team Experience
• Business Plan/Marketing Strategy
• Product/Process Benchmark Data
• Product/Process Assumptions
• Product Reliability Studies
• Customer Inputs
11
APQP Plan a n d D e fin e Ph a s e
Concept Initiation/Approval
Outputs:
• Design Goals
• Reliability and Quality Goals
• Preliminary Bill of Materials
• Preliminary Process Flow Chart
• Preliminary Listing of Special Product and Process
Characteristics
• Product Assurance Plan
• Management Support
12
APQP P r o d u c t D e s ig n a n d D e v e l o p m e n t Ph ase
Program Approval
Design Outputs: APQP Outputs:
• Design Failure Mode and Effects
• New Equipment, Tooling and
Analysis (DFMEA)
Facilities Requirements
• Design for Manufacturability and
• Special Product and Process
Assembly
Characteristics
• Design Verification
• Gages / Testing Equipment
• Design Reviews Requirements
• Prototype Build -- Control Plan • Team Feasibility Commitment
& Management Support
• Engineering Drawings (Including
Math Data)
• Engineering Specifications
• Material Specifications
• Drawing and Specification
Changes
13
APQP P r o c e s s D e s ig n a n d D e v e l o p m e n t Ph a s e
Prototype
Outputs:
• Packaging Standards and Specifications
• Product/Process Quality System Review
• Process Flow Chart
• Floor Plan Layout
• Process Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (PFMEA)
• Characteristics Matrix
• Pre-Launch Control Plan
• Process Instructions
• Measurement System Analysis Plan
• Management Support
• Preliminary Process Capability Study Plan
14
APQP P r o d u c t a n d P r o c e s s Va l i d a t i o n Ph a s e
Pilot
Outputs:
• Significant Production Run
• Measurement Systems Evaluation
• Preliminary Process Capability Study
• Production Part Approval
• Production Validation Testing
• Packaging Evaluation
• Production Control Plan
• Quality Planning Sign-Off and Management Support
15
APQP F e e d b a c k , A s s e s s m e n t a n d C o r r e c t i v e A c t i o n Ph a s e
Launch
Outputs:
• Reduced Variation
• Improved Customer Satisfaction
• Improved Delivery and Service
• Effective Use of Lessons Learned/Best Practice
16
ADVANCED PRODUCT QUALITY PLANNING
Pitfalls
• APQP treated as a “Quality Department Responsibility”
• APQP a separate process, not integrated into product
development
• Key stakeholders brought in late (quality, production,
suppliers)
• Milestones and deliverables ignored
• No top management involvement/support
17
FMEA
Failure Mode and Effects
Analysis
18
FMEA
What is it?
A risk analysis of a part or process
19
Types of FMEAs
Design FMEA
Process FMEA
20
Types of FMEAs
Others:
System FMEA
Concept FMEA
Environmental FMEA
Machinery FMEA
Software FMEA
21
FMEA Process
Subsystem C Potential O D
Current
Potential Potential S l Cause(s)/ c e a e R. Recommended t Responsibility Action Results
Controls
Failure Effect(s) of Mechanism(s) c v s P. Action(s) & Target Actions S O D R.
Function Mode Failure of Failure u Prevention Detection e N. Completion Date Taken e c e P.
Requirements s r c v c t N.
What can be
What are How bad done?
the Effects? is it?
–Design
What are the
Changes
Functions, Features
or Requirements?
– Process
Changes
– Special
Controls
How – Changes to
What are Standards,
often
the Procedures, or
does it
What can go Cause(s)? guides
happen?
wrong?
–No function
– Partial / Over
/Degraded
Function
How can this be How good is
– Intermittent
prevented and this method at
Function
detected? detecting it?
– Unintended
Function
22
Risk Action Strategies
3rd Priority is RPN. RPN evaluates the ability to detect and contain
poor quality.
23
Failure Mode and Effects Analysis
Pitfalls
• FMEA started late in the development process (just in time
for PPAP!)
• FMEA never updated after release
• FMEA not updated from nonconformity corrective actions
• Right side (action area) is blank
• RPN thresholds
• FMEA written by one person
• FMEA treated as a “Quality Department Responsibility”
24
Control Plan
25
Control Plan
What is it?
A summary of controls used to make sure my
customer gets good product
26
Control Plan
CONTROLPLAN
Prototype Pre-Launch Production
Control Plan Number Key Contact/Phone Date (Orig.) Date (Rev.)
Part Number/Latest Change Level Core Team Customer Engineering Approval/Date (If Req'd.)
Supplier/Plant Supplier Code Other Approval/Date (If Req'd.) Other Approval/Date (If Req'd.)
MACHINE,
CHARACTERISTICS METHODS
PART/ PROCESSNAME/ DEVICE, SPECIAL
PROCESS OPERATION JIG,TOOLS, CHAR. PRODUCT/PROCESS EVALUATION/ SAMPLE REACTION
NUMBER DESCRIPTION FOR MFG. NO. PRODUCT PROCESS CLASS SPECIFICATION/ MEASUREMENT SIZE FREQ. CONTROL PLAN
TOLERANCE TECHNIQUE METHOD
27
Control Plan Elements
IATF 16949 Annex A
A.2 Elements of the control plan
The organization shall develop a control plan that includes, as a minimum, the following contents.
a) General data
⎯control plan number,
c) Process control
⎯ issue date and revision date, if any,
⎯ process parameters,
⎯ customer information (see customer requirements),
⎯ process-related special characteristics,
⎯ organization's name/site designation,
⎯ machines, jigs, fixtures, tools for manufacturing.
⎯ part number(s),
d) Methods
⎯ part name/description,
⎯ evaluation measurement technique,
⎯ engineering change level,
⎯ error-proofing,
⎯ phase covered (prototype, pre-launch, production),
⎯ sample size and frequency,
⎯ key contact,
⎯ control method.
⎯ part/process step number,
e) Reaction plan and corrective actions
⎯ process name/operation description.
⎯ reaction plan (include or reference),
b) Product control
⎯ corrective action.
⎯ product-related special characteristics,
⎯ other characteristics for control (number, product or process),
⎯ specification/tolerance.
28
Control Plan
Pitfalls
• Control plan and PFMEA not aligned
• Control plan and operator instructions not aligned
• Control plan out of date
• Control plan not updated from nonconformity corrective
actions
29
PPAP
Production Part Approval
Process
30
PPAP
What is it?
Requirements for approval of production parts.
31
PPAP
1 Design Records
11 Initial Process Study
2 Authorized Engineering Change Documents
12 Qualified Laboratory Documentation
3 Customer Engineering Approval
13 Appearance Approval Report
4 Design FMEA
14 Sample Production Parts
5 Process Flow Diagrams
15 Master Samples
6 Process FMEA
16 Checking Aids
7 Control Plan
17 Customer-Specific Requirements (Records)
8 Measurement System Analysis Studies
18 Part Submission Warrant
9 Dimensional Results
Bulk Material Requirements Checklist
10 Material / Performance Test Results
32
34
Production Part Approval Process
Pitfalls
• PPAP is treated as a separate process, rather than integrated
into product development
• Incomplete PPAP
• Assuming that submission levels are what’s required, rather
than what’s submitted
35
SPC
Statistical Process
Control
36
SPC
What is it?
A collection of statistical methods, especially
control charts, used to analyze and control a
process
37
Variation
38
Distributions can vary in Location
Mean = Average or X
39
Distributions can vary in Spread
Range = R
Standard Deviation = or s
Variance = 2
40
Distributions can vary in Shape
Normal Distribution
68.25%
95.46%
99.73%
3 2 X 2 3
41
Control vs. Capability C o m m o n a n d S p e c i a l C a u s es
42
Control vs. Capability
Statistical Control
43
Cp, Cpk, Pp & Ppk
44
Measures of Process Capability
(Capability Index)
Within
Overall Subgroup
Within Variation Variation
Subgroup
Overall Variation Variation
if stable
Capability
Pp Cp
If centered
Overall Within
Kenneth J Kortge
45
Capability Metrics – Acceptance Criteria
Typical:
46
2 Types of Data
Va r i a b l e
Attribute
47
Variables Charts
Typical:
Plots the average size Plots the individual Plots the sample size
What Is and the range of the sizes of the parts and and the moving range
Charted part sizes the median of the part of the sample size
sizes
Sample
Subgroup Usually 3 to 6 Should be an odd One
Size number: 3, 5, 7, etc.
48
Attribute Charts
Typical:
Chart Type P Chart nP Chart C Chart U Chart
Primary Used for Used for Used for Used for
Usage analyzing analyzing the analyzing analyzing
proportion or number nonconformities nonconformities
percent nonconforming or defects per unit
nonconforming or defective
or defective parts parts
What is Plots the Plots the Plots the count Plots the
Charted proportion or number of of all average number
percent of the nonconforming nonconformities of
nonconforming items found in the nonconformities
units sample in each sample
49
X & R Chart
50
How Control Charts Work
UCLX • •
• •
•
•
X
•
• •
•
•
•
LCLX
51
Special Cause Criteria
52
Special Cause Criteria
53
Statistical Process Control
Pitfalls
• Ignoring out of control conditions
• Comparing control limits to spec limits
• Making process adjustments without understanding the
source of the special cause variation
• Putting SPC charts on everything
54
MSA
Measurement Systems
Analysis
55
MSA
What is it?
A collection of statistical methods used to assess
how much I can trust the information from a
gauge
57
Stability: change in bias over time
58
Linearity: change in bias across expected range of
measurements
59
Gage Repeatability and Reproducibility = GRR = R&R
Typical:
10 Parts
3 Appraisers
3 Trials
60
GRR / R&R
GRR =
2
Reproducibility
2
+
2
Repeatability
61
Repeatability: gage-induced variation
Appraiser A
Repeatability
62
Reproducibility: operator-induced variation
Reproducibility
Appraiser A C B
63
The Effect of Measurement Error
“Observed” “Actual”
Total Variation = Process Variation + Measurement Variation
2 2
= Process +
2
Total Measurement
Think of a
right triangle
Measurement
Variation
Process Variation
Kenneth J Kortge
64
The Effect of Measurement Error
2
=
2
2
Total Process + Measurement
Measurement
Variation
65
Gage R&R Acceptance Criteria (Typical)
% R&R
Under 10% error – Acceptable
10% - 30% error – May be acceptable based upon
importance of application, cost of measurement device, cost
of repair, etc.
Over 30% error – Not Acceptable. Every effort should be
made to improve the measurement system
66
Measurement Systems Analysis
Pitfalls
• Using MSA to obtain a number, rather than to understand
gage variation
• Not documenting a conclusion and any actions needed, as
part of the study
• Not conducting MSA for all gages on the control plan
(IATF 16949 requirement)
• Not validating Software (IATF 16949 requirement)
• Using wrong analysis method (non-replicable, attribute, etc.)
67
Automotive Core Tools
Control Plan
69