You are on page 1of 3

PROS OF DEATH PENALTY

 It daunt people to commit dreadful crimes l. Criminals will get scared of committing
crimes because they will suffer such harsh punishment. The fear of suffering will
discouraged this potential criminals to commit crimes.
 Death penalty costs the government less. compared to the costs of life
imprisonment because they will be given the expenses of food, health care and
other costs that will sustain their lives. Some critics says that spending for people
who committed such heinous crimes is impractical and just a waste of taxpayers’
 Death Penalty will reduce the number of crime rate in the country because
criminals will just be taking advantage of people without harsh punishments.
 It is what hardened criminals deserve. Criminals become bolder and careless to
commit crimes knowing that they will only be imprisoned that is why they are not
scared of repeating heinous crimes. Thus, these type of people should be put to
death to project the majority.
 Death penalty is just punishable to drug related crimes only, which was stated
under the House Bill Number 4727. However, President Rodrigo “Digong” Duterte
wants plunder, rape to be next in line among the heinous crimes punishable with
death penalty.

CONS OF DEATH PENALTY

 There are innocent people wrongly executed. Critics believed that they keep on
sending innocent people who are wrongly accused to death row and the sad thing
about this is that, innocence is proven after the execution has been carried out.
 Critics also argue that death penalty does not really deter criminals from
committing crimes, since there are criminals who suffer from mental illness and
death sentence will not prevent them from doing things they can no longer control
without proper medication.
 Pro death penalty believed that feeding the inmates is much more expensive than
death penalty. On contrary to that, Anti- death penalty believes that the drug used
in lethal injection and other expenses related to execution is much more costly.
 Death penalty is a form of revenge. While pro death penalty thinks that capital
punishment is a form of death retribution, Anti death penalty also believes that to
avenge a crime committed by individual may be understandable yet killing
someone is also unconstitutional. It is also a crime that is only masked by the term
capital punishment but the reality is, it only continues the series of violence.
 People who have been involved in the process of death penalty suffer from
depression out of guilt from having to end another person’s life. Former executioner
once stated that people who participated in executions were later destroyed, some
of them turned to drugs and alcohol to feel better.
 It is a platform that is anti-poor because accused people who are poor are mostly
the ones who get the death penalty, since these people lack finances to pay for a
powerful defense attorneys.
 It is not humanity and cannot be undone. Those innocent criminals who got
executed and then latter would have proven the person’s innocence, he or she can
never be brought back to life anymore.

REASON BY THE CONS


1. LACK OF JOB OPPORTUNITIES

- Paano mo masasabi na kulang tayo sa trabaho eh hindi naman sila nakapag-aral o nakapagtapos sa
pag-aaral ika nga ni Nelson Mandela “EDUCATION IS THE MOST POWERFUL WEAPON WHICH YOU CAN
USE TO CHANGE THE WORLD”

2. WE DON’T HAVE THE RIGHT TO END A PERSON’S LIFE

- But the Government have a rights. See the difference the Religion is declared unacceptable death
penalty but the Government let it. And so we all know that the Government is a big rival between
Religion? Pero bakit? Bakit yung mismong suspek ay kumitil ng isang buhay ng tao. Wala tayong karapatan
pero ginawa niya pa rin. Halimbawa nalang na Mahalaga ba ang magulang mo? Pamilya mo? Mahala ga ba
para sa iyo? Irate mo 1-10… Masasabi nating oo mahalaga pero sa kabila ng lahat kapag may pumatay sa
ina’t ama mo o anak or whatever.. Anong sinasabi ng damdamin mo? Hindi ba magagalit? Kaya sapat lang
ba na imprisonment ang mahatol sa suspek na pumatay sa relatives mo? Sapat ba iyon?! Sumagot ka!! O
ano nga ba dapat talaga ang mahatol sa suspek? ani ng marami. Killing murderes is the same as murder.
Lintik talaga yang Capital punishment nay an ehh they keep still alive the suspect sanctifies the value of
human life. Pero mali…. Keeping the every suspect alive cheapens human life because it belittles human
life. Imagine that the punishment for murder were the same as the punishment for driving over the speed
limit. Wouldn’t that belittle murder and thereby cheapen human life? Of course it would. How about the
pain inflicted on the loved ones of those murdered? For most people, their suffering immeasurably
increased knowing that the person who murdered. Their family member or friend and who in many cases,
inflicted unimaginable terror is alive and being cared for. Syempre once na pinatay mo ang isang tao ay
hinding hindi na maibabalik but it sure does provide some sense of justice. That’s why Dr. Petit a physician
his words that death is really the only true just punishment for certain heinous and depraved murders.
Moreover, by keeping every murderer alive, many MORE people are murdered.
Do you really believe that the torturers, rapists, murderers of Dr. William Petit’s wife and daughters, and
evil men like them deserve to keep their lives? If you’re like most people, your answer is no. Your heart
your mind your whole being cries out for some justice and fairness in this world. But if you really do
believe these people deserve to keep their lives, well as I said at the outset, I don’t understand you.

PARA MALIWANAGAN KAYO SA KEYWOARD NA ITO:

POLITICS FOLLOW THE COUNTRY’S LAW

CHURCH FOLLOW GOD’S LAW

You might also like