July 05, 2019 § RES IPSA LIQUITOR

YELLOW BUS LINE vs LIM (2017)

CIV RECENT JURISPRUDENCE KASUMPONG vs CORTERO

PERSONS
§ ART.26 FC § PROXIMATE CAUSE
REPUBLIC vs MANALO (2018) PNB vs RAYMUNDO (DEC.2017)
- Filipino spouse can be considered to
obtain a divorce decree abroad § ART 2180
Note: applies only by one alien and filipino. MENDOZA vs GOMEZ
It cannot be valid if both are filipinos.
Reckoning: (citizenship involved) REYES vs COMELEC
At the time of the divorce and not at the time
of marriage. (Rep. vs Orbecido)

§ ART. 36 FC REP. vs MOLINA

§ ART.41
MATIAS vs REPUBLIC
- If te purpose is not for remarry, you
cannot avail of art.41

§ ART.50 in relation to 43, 86 FC

GR: only the parties of the marriage can file
during the life time
XPM: JULIAN vs REPUBLIC (LANDMARK
CASE)
If the basis for petition is BIGAMY, the
previous spouse and not the subsequent
spouse can file.

GARLET vs GARLET (2017)

ALEJO vs CORTES (2017)
UY vs FERNANDEZ (2017)
BARCELETO vs TINITIGAN
CASTILLO vs CASTILLO (2016) *

TORTS AND DAMAGES

HUMAN RELATIONS

§ LAST CLEAR CHANCE DOCTRINE

- It does not apply to passengers
GREENSTAR CASE (2016)

KOKO KRUNCH