Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Cuyegkeng Vs Cruz Case Digest
Cuyegkeng Vs Cruz Case Digest
Cruz
G.R. No. L
-
16263
Facts:
Issue:
Whet
her or not petitioners’ have valid causes of
action.
Held:
No. The Court Ruled that Respondent has a
good
and valid
right to his title
on the grounds that one
who does not claim to be entitled to the office
allegedly usurped or unlawfully held or exercise
d by
another cannot question his title by quo warranto.
This suggests that petitioners have no cause of
action against the respondent. While the
intervenors have no right to question the title of
respondent. Hence, the petition for quo warranto
has no mer
it.