Ibc-Seismic Design Provision - 2009 by DR SK Gosh

¥u CLD LaLa 3, ‘Abu Dhabl International Buildina code ALAM est Mad tas pate Tnexporton wit Ineratinal code Counc a Boao eae (1) (oy Aataad att B y gust Vo08 stout! bill agS 2009 IBC SEISMIC DESIGN PROVISIONS SASSY SY ae eyenett) cuties ats By DR. SK GHOSH 28 Sep 09 — 01 Oct 09S. K. Ghosh Associates Ino. TN ea CODE COUNCIE | | | THE 2009 INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE Structural-Seismic Provisions With an Emphasis on Transitioning from | the 1997 Uae |_ rterondonst Code Couns reo) S-X, Ghosh Asso vwredcestearg Palatine, Thand Alo Le ‘own shy hoshassoctates.co * The Uniform Builting Code (UBC), 1997 and previous editions are Sopyrighted publications of the international Code Council, Ine * The Intemational Building Code (IBC), 2009 and previous editions | &r9 copyrighted publications of the International Code Council, ino The International Code Council (IC) is @ nonprofit membership aesociation dedicated to protecting the health, safety, and welfare of people by creating better buildings end safer communtice encgsstst $0 New Jersey enue NW ‘Washes, De d000r 2070 Pret Ott Bingham AL} Chenu 1 Los Angle, CA www.skghoshassociates,com 1Da ign Pista Le 05 ee www.skghoshassociates.com8. K. Ghosh Associate: bode are ert it www.skghoshassociates.com8! K. Ghosh Associates Ind. UPDATING OF STANDARDS National Loading Standard 1997 UBC =| 2000 IBC 2003 IBC | ASCE7-95 |ASCE7-98 |ASCE 7-02 a 2006 IBC 2009 IBC JASCE 7-08 |ASCE 7.05 a z www.skghoshassociates.com 4S. K. Ghosh Associates Inc. _—_—_=___ Concrete Standard 1997 uBe (200018 | (2003 IBC | | ACI 318-96 , acl ACI 318-99, 318-02 | 2006 IBC |2009 18 1BC ACI 318-05 |ACI 318-08 §) {— 2 z= — Masonry Standard 1997 UBC 2000 IBC |2003 IBC ] [None |ACI 830-99 | act 630.02 ACI 530.1-99 | [Ac §30.1-02 | SE ACT 530.1-02 | 2006 IBC 2009 IBC | 7) | ACI §30-05 ac} 530-08 ip 7 5 ACI §30.1-05 | Aci 530.1-08 | www.skghoshassociates.com 5S. K. Ghosh Associates nc. Steel Standards 1997 UBC | 2009 166 —_—__—|—_~ = AISC LRFD 1988, [Aiso 960-06 | aise asb 1889 | aise 60-08 ‘AISC Seismic 1982 0 AISC 341-08 AISILRFD 129% AISI $100-07 As1 ASD 1986 (with 1968 addendum) None AISC 960-05 Bn = ee Steel Standards eae | 2000 IBC 2003 IBC 2006 IBC ‘AISC LRFD 1983, AISC LRFD 1899 [aise 360-05 Incl, Suppl. No. 4, January 1998 ‘AISC ASD 1989 AISC ASD 1988 AISC 360-08 Inel. Suppl. No. t, 2001 [wise 935] ‘AISC Seismic 1987 | AISC Seismic 2002 ASC 341-08 Incl. Suppl. No. 1, 1998 | [AISC 941] AISI 1996 AISUNASPEC 200 AISINAS 2001 Incl. | 2004 Suppl. AISC HSS 1997 AISG HSS 2000 AISC 260-05 www.skghoshassociates.com 68. K. Ghosh Associates ine Cold-Formed Steel Standards in 2009 IBC '$100—07 North American Specification for the Dasign of Cold-tormed Stes! Structural Members 200-07 North American Standard for Cold-formed Ste Provisions 5210-07 North American Standard for Cold-formed Steel Framing-—Floor and Roof System Design ‘S211—07 North American Standard for Coleformed Steel Framing—Well Stud Design 212-07 North American Standard for Cold-formed Stool Framing—Header ‘| Posign 8213-07 North American Standard for Gold-formed Steel Framing—Lateral Design ‘$2407 North American Standard for Cold-formed Stoel Framing—Truss Design, with Supplement 2, dated 2008 $220—07 Standard for Cold-formed Stoel Framing—Presoriptive Method for One- | Framing~General and Twofamily Dwellings, with Supplement 2, dated 2008, Wood Standard 1997 UBC 2000 IBC 2003 1BC AF&PA NDS - 91 lAFapa NDS - 97 |AF&PA NDS - 01 ASCE 16-95 (ASCE 16-95 | 2006 IBC 2009 gc AF&PA NDS -05 | AF&PA NDS - 05 www.skghoshassociates.comgz S. K, Ghosh Associates Ino. Structural Design Requirements 2009 IBC Chapter 16 - Design Loads, Chapter 17 - Inspections / Testing Chapter 18 - Foundations Chapter 19 - Concrete“ Chapter 20 - Aluminum Chapter 21 - Masonry Chapter 22 ~ Steel Chapter 23 - Wood 1605.2.1 Strength Design or LRFD Load Combinations (2009 IBC) cle 4.A(D +P) amit (Equation 16-1) 4.20 +F + He 1e(L+H)+ yA 0.5(L, or S or R) ; (Equation 16-2) 4.20 +1.6(L, or S or R) + (f,L or 0.8W) (Equation 16-3) 1.2D+1.6W+f,L +0,5(L,orSorR) (Equation 16-4) 1.204 10E +f, +£,8 (Equation 16-8) 0.90 + 1.6W + 41.6H (Equation 16-6) 0.9D + 1.0E + 4.6H (Equation 16-7) f, = 0.5 except in special circumstances f, = 0.2 except in special situations www. skghoshassociates.com 8S. K, Ghosh Associates Ine, a 1605.2 Strength Design or | | LRFD Load Combinations ( 2009 IBC) 1605.2.2 Flood loads. Where F, is to be considered in design, the load combination of Sec. 2.3.3 of ASCE7 shall be used, | _—_—=_=~=_ 2.3.2 Strength Design or LRFD Load Combinations | (ASCE 7-05) 1. 1.4(D + F) 2. 1.2(D +F +7) +4.6(L +H) +0.8(L, or S or R) 3.1.20 #1.6(L, or S of R) + (Lor 0.8W) 4.1.20 +1.6W + [1.0]L +0.8(L, or or R) 5.1.20 +1.0E+L+0.28 6.0.90 + 1.6W + 4.6H | 7.0.90 + 1.08 + 4.6H Es = "| www. skghoshassociates.com 9S. K. Ghosh Associates Ine. ——————— 2.3.2 Strength Design or LRFD Load | Combinations (ASCE 7-05) Exceptions: |4. The load factor on L in combinations (3), (4), and (5) is permitted to equal 0.5 for all occupancies in | which Ly is less than or equal to 100 psf, with the exception of garages or areas occupied as places of public assembly. 2. The load factor on H shall be set equal to zero in | combinations (6) and (7) if the structural action due to H counteracts that due to W or E. q _ — 1612.2.1 Strength Design or LRFD Load Combinations (1997 UBC) Us 14D (124) | Us 1.2D+4.6L +0.5 (L, or S) (12-2) = 1.2D+4.6(L, or S)+ (f,L or 0.8W) (12-3) = 1.2D+4.9W+f,L+0.5(L, or 8) (12-4) U= 1,2D+4.0E +(f,L+ £8) (12-5) Us 0,9D +(1.0E or 1.3W) (12-6) E = Design earthquake force (strength-level) , | wow.skghoshassociates.com 108. K, Ghosh Associates Inc, co ASCE 7-05 | 6.5 Analytical Procedure * Directionality factor K, introduced in 1998 » Added to velocity pressure equation *q, = 0.00256 K, K, Ky V21 » Separate out effect of wind load factor » Requires adjustment to wind load factor (1.3 1.6) » Table 6-4 Reason: Explicitly identify directionality effect in future editions. ASCE 7-05 2.3.2 Strength Design Load Combinations Wind load factor: * Old (1995): LF = effect -3 + included directionality 0.86 (directionality) x 1.53 (LF wlo directionality) = 1.3 | * Now: Identify directionality effect explicitly in K,, Round load factor from 1.53 to 1.6. wunw.skghoshassaciates.com W8. K, Ghosh Associates Inc 16121.2.1 Strength Design or LRFD Load Combinations (1997 UBC) U= 1.2D+1.0E + (f,L + f,S) (12-5) | U = 0.9D+(1.0E or 1.3W) (12-6) E =p, +E, in (12-5), (12-6) E, = 0.5C,ID | * p =1 in Seismic Zones 0,1,2 www.skghoshassociates.com 128. K. Ghosh Associates Inc, ee Seismic Strength Design Load Combinations (2009 IBC, ASCE 7-05) *41.2D+1.0E+f,L+f8 Equation (16-5) * 0.9D + 1.0E Equation (16-7) . 0.28,,D in Equation (16-5) + B= pQg - 0.2855) in Equation (16-7) * p=1 in Seismic Design Category (SDC) A, B and C nn ween S eee i = Strength Design or LRFD Load Combinations - Exceptions UBC Exceptions for concrete | structures DELETED www.skghoshassociates.comdl D+H+FeL+T (Equation 13-9) D+H+F+(L,orSorR) (Equation 18-10) D+H+F+0.75(L +1) + 0.78(L, oF S oF R) (Equation 16-11) D+H+F+(Wor0.7E) (Equation 16-12) D+H+F +0,75(W or 0.7) + O.75L + 0.78(L, or $ or R) (Equation 16-13) | pagosd + WH (Equation 16-14) | (Equation 16-15) Ghosh Associates Inc. [ 1605.3.1 ASD Load Combinations- | | ose Basic (2009 1BC) Equation 16-8) [ 2 3, 4, 5 6, 7, a 2.4.1 ASD Load Combinations - Basic (ASCE 7-05) D+F DHFR HL HT D+H+F+(L,or$ or) D+ H+ F + 0,75(L +7) +0,78(L, or S of R) D+H+F +(Wor0.7E) D+ H+ F + 0,75(W or 0.7E) + 0.75L + 0.75(L, or § or R) 06D +W+H .0.6D + 0.7E +H www.skghoshassociates.com 148.K. Ghosh Associates Ine, 1612.3.1 ASD Load Combinations - Basic (1997 UBC, from ASCE 7-95) D (12-7) D+L+(L, ors) (12-8) | D + (Wor E/1.4) (12-9) c (12-10) [0.90 + eM.4 D+O78[L + (L, or S) + (Wor E/1.4)] (12-12) E=pE, +0 | A = = ASD Load Combinations - Basic (ASCE 7-05) — Allowable Stress Increase | ® —+—» ° 1/3 stress increase not permitted * Load duration increase permitted www. skghoshassociates.com1605.3.2 ASD Load Combinations — Alternate Basic (2009 IBC, from 1994 UBC) | D+¥L+ (Lor orR) (Equation 16-16) | D+L+(oW) (Equation 16-17) D+L+ow+si2 (Equation 16-18) | D+L+S+ oWi2 (Equation 16-19) it DeL+S+Eg (Equation 16-20) | | 090+ 6/14 (Equation 16-21) | Where wind loads are calctslated in accordance with Chapter 6 of ASCE 7-06, the coefficient a in the above formulas shall be taken as 1.3, | 1605.3.2 ASD Load Combinations- | Alternate Basic (2009 IBC) + For load combinations that include the counteracting effects of dead and wind loads, only two-thirds of the minimum dead load likely to be in place during a design wind | | event shall be used. | | + When using these alternative load combinations to evaluate | sliding, overturning and soil bearing at the soil-structure interface, the reduction of foundation overturning from Sec. 12.13.4 of ASCE 7 shall not be used, | * When using these alternative basic load combinations for proportioning foundations for loadings, which include seismic loads, the vertical seismic load effect is permitted to be taken equal to zero. www. skghoshassociates.com 16Associates Ine. 1612.3.2 ASD Load Combinations - | Alternate Basic (1997 UBC) D+L+(L,or$) (12-12) D+L+ (Wor E/1.4) (12-13) | D+L+W+S/2 (12-14) | D+L+S+wi2 (12-18) D+L+S+Eli4 (12-16) | | 0.9D + E14 (2) | E=pE,+0 | Alternate Basic (2009 IBC, 1997 UBC) — ASD Load Combinations - | Allowable Stress Increase » When using these alternate basic load | combinations that include wind or seismic | loads, allowable stresses are permitted to be increased or load combinations reduced, where permitted by the material chapter of | this code or referenced standard. | | www.skghoshassociates.com 175. K, Ghosh Associates Ino, 1605.4 Special Seismic Load Combinations (2006 IBC) + 1.2D+f,L+E,, (Equation 16-22) | ° 0.9D +E, (Equation 16-23) Ey = % Qe + 0.2 SpgD, while E =pQ:+0.28,3D ee 1612.4 Special Seismic Load Combinations (1997 UBC) °4,.2D4+%,L44.0E,, (12-17) + 0.9D + 1.0E,, (12-48) E,, = Oy, while E =E,+E, www.skghoshassociates.com 182006 IBC 1605.4 Special Seismic Load | Combinations Section 1605.4 is deleted in its entirety in the 2009 IBC, | SPECIAL SEISMIC LOAD COMBINATIONS is replaced with LOAD COMBINATIONS WITH OVERSTRENGTH FACTORS of ASCE 7-08 = Why Was 2006 IBC Section 1605.4 Deleted? To eliminate a disconnect between IBC and ASCE 7-05: » 2006 IBC Section 1605.4 had one set of “special seismic load combinations” | applicable to both ASD and strength | design, » ASCE 7-05 has two sets of “load combinations with overstrength factors”...one for ASD and one for strength design www.skghoshassociates.com 198. K. Ghosh Associates Ine. Why Was 2006 IBC Section 1605.4 Deleted? To eliminate a disconnect between IBC and ASCE 7-05 (cont.): » 2006 IBC had separate, unique load | combinations that were to be applied where specifically required. » ASCE 7-05 prescribes an equation for E,, that is to be used in ASCE 7-05 Ch. 2 load combinations. mn = | 12.4.3.2 Load Combinations with Overstrength Factor (ASCE 7-05) Basic Combinations for Strength Design with Overstrength Factor (1.2 + 0.2Sp.)D + Q,Q, + L + 0.28 (0.9 - 0.2Sp,)D + QQ, + 1.6H S www.skghoshassociates.com 208. K. Ghosh Associates Inc. | 12.4,3.2 Load Combinations with | Overstrength Factor (ASCE 7-05) | Basic Combinations for Allowable Stress Design with Overstrength Factor (1.0 + 0.148p.)D +H + F + 0.70,Q¢ (1.0 + 0.1058,5)D +H + F + 0,5250Q,Q. + 0.75L + 0.75(L, or S or R) (0.6 = 0.148,,)D + 0.72,Q;+H 12.4.3.3 Load Combinations with Overstrength Factor (ASCE 7-05) | Where allowable stress design methodologies are | used, allowable stresses are permitted to be | determined using an allowable stress increase of | 1.2. This increase shall not be combined with increases in allowable stresses or load combination reductions ...except that combination with the | duration of load increases permitted in AF&PA NDS is permitted. www skghoshassociates.com 248. K. Ghosh Associate: nc. | | | 1617.1.2 Maximum Seismic Load | Effect, E,, (2000, 2003 IBC) | Where allowable stress design | methodologies are used with the special load combinations of Section 1605.4, design strengths are permitted to be determined using an allowable stress increase of 1.7 .... What Takes the Place of Deleted 2006 | IBC Section 1605.4? New language in 2009 IBC Section 1605.1. | www.skghoshassociates.com8. K. Ghosh Associates Inc. Q@: A: for Special Seismic Load Combinations Q: Section 1605.4 of the 2006 IBC sets forth special seismic load combinations and indicates that they need to be applied wi | required by Section 1605.1 and in Chap | 18 through 23. Section 1605.1 refers | specifically to ASCE 7-05 Sections 12.3.3.3 | and 12.10, Can you elaborate? i A = Q: A: for Special Seismic Load Combinations Az: [Collector Elements /12.10.2.1, 12.14.7.3 | | ae Structural diaphragm | SeShipeirwall —_SeeeveseyigieiSeuatieriaue: 189 Wwwnw.skghoshassociates.com 23Q: A: for Special Seismic Load Combinations Q: A: for Special Seismic Load \ Combinations | | A:/Elements Supporting a | /12.3.3.3 | | |Discontinuous Walls or Frames |8. K. Ghosh Ass Q: A: for Special Seismic Load Combinations rT ' Q: A: for Special Seismic Load Combinations shassociates.com 258. K. Ghosh Associates Inc, Q: A: for Special Seismic Load Combinations A: More... 2009 IBC Section | | "|Splices of Pile Segments | 1808.2.23.1.1 [Grade Beams ___| 1808,2.23.2.1 |. Connection to Pile Cap 1808,2.23.2.2 Connection between batter pile | 1808,2.23.2.3 and grade beam or pile cap. Conerete columns supporting | 1908.1.12 discontinuous stiff members 1606 Dead Loads * 1997 UBC (1606.2) - Movable partition loads are dead loads * 2009 IBC (1607.5), ASCE 7-08 (4.2.2) ~ Movable partition loads | are live loads www.skghoshassociates.com 26S. K, Ghosh Associates Inc. Se 1607 Live Loads + 1997 UBC Table 16-A and ASCE 7- 05 Table 4-1 / 2009 IBC Table 1607.1 (Uniform and Concentrated Loads) play the same role . However, the tables are quite different in scope and substance. 1607 Live Loads * A counterpart to 1997 UBC Table 16-B (Special Loads) is not found in 2008 IBC/ASCE 7-05. Some of the items are included in ASCE 7-05 Table 4-1 / 2009 IBC Table 1607.1, some other items are covered in ASCE 7-05 Sec. 4.4 / 2009 IBC Sect. 1607.7. mee ale www. skghoshassociates.com 27S. K, Ghosh Associates Ine. 1607 Live Loads (2009 IBC) » ASCE 7-05 with some modifications Alternate floor live load reduction, based on tributary rather than influence areas, retained from the UBC and other model codes. Aa A 2009 IBC 1607.9.2 Alternate Floor Live Load Reduction (1997 UBC 1607.5) + Applies to slab systems, beams, girders, columns, piers, walls and foundations. A reduction shall not be permitted in passenger vehicle parking garages except that the live loads for members supporting two or more floors are permitted to be | reduced by a maximum of 20 percent. ca * NEW IN THE 2006 IBC vwnww.skghoshassociaa 1607 Live Loads (2009 IBC) + In ASCE 7-05 Table 4-1/ 2009 IBC Table 1607.1, the uniform Live Load for garages (passenger vehicles only) is 40 psf, reduced from the previous value of 50 psf The uniform Live Load is not reducible except as permitted by ASCE 7-05 Section 4.8.3/ 2008 IBC Section 1607.9.2 Item3 i me} + Floors in garages... shall be designed for the 1607 Live Loads (2009 IBC) ASCE 7-05 Table 4-1/ 2009 IBC Table 1607.1, Minimum Live Loads uniformly distributed live loads ... or the following concentrated loads: (1) for garages restricted to vehicles accommodating not more than nine passengers, 2608 3000 pounds acting on an area of 4.5 inches by 4.5 inches; Q:. www.skghoshassociates.com. 298. K. Ghosh Associates Inc. tt 1607.4 Roof Live Load (1997 UBC) * Provisions are quite different from those of ASCE 7-05 / 2009 IBC. IBC 1607.11.2 Roof Live Load » ASCE 7-05 The minimum uniformly distributed roof live load, Ly, is given in Table 1607.1. Le www.skghoshassociates.com 305. K, Ghosh Associates Inc. IBC 1607.11.2 Roof Live Load + ASCE 7-05 L,= LyR,R, where 12 IBC Design Ground Motion | + Site Class D must be used when the soil properties are not known in sufficient detail, unless the building official determines that Site Class E or F is likely to be present at the site BD * Table 11.4-1/1613.5.3(1) Values of Site Coefficient F,? a. Mapped Spectral Response Acs. at Short Periods Class | s,<0.25| 5.20.5 | 8g=0.75|8,=1.00| 8,2 1.25 lI a ce) oe | wo | 10 | 40 io 4.2 LE 4.0 | 1.0 | ce od io Noteb | Nofeb | Note b www.skghoshassociates.com 408. K. Ghosh Associates inc. Table 11.4-1/1613.5.3(1) Values of Site | Coefficient F,? | a, Use straight line interpolation for intermediate values of mapped spectral | acceleration at short period S; | b. Values shall be determined in accordance | with Section 11.4.7 of ASCE7 Table 11.4-2/1613.5.3(2) Values of Site Coefficient F,* 8,04 | 8,502 | s,=03 | 3, class | ww8. K. Ghosh Associates Ine. ae Ee Table 11.4-2/1613.5.3(2) Values of Site Coefficient F,? | a. Use straight line interpolation for intermediate | values of mapped spectral acceleration at 1 second period S, b, Values shall be determined in accordance with Section 11.4.7 of ASCE 7 IBC Design Ground Motion Sys = Soil-modified MCE spectral response acceleration at short periods =F,S, Sy; = Soil-modified MCE spectral response acceleration at 1.0-second period =F,S, www.skghosh:ag a 8. K, Ghosh Associates Inc. IBC Ground Motion * Sps = design spectrai response acceleration at short periods = (213) Sys Z Sp, = design spectral response acceleration at 1.0-second period = (2/3) Sy, Z | 1997 UBC Design Earthquake Ground Motion * Approximately 90% probability of non-exceedance in 50 years (approx. 475 yr. return period) www.skghoshassociates.com 435. K, Ghosh Associates Inc [a | Design Basis: IBC vs, UBC * Design to avoid collapse in the | Maximum Considered Earthquake, rather than to provide life safety in the 500-year return period earthquake IBC Ground Motion * Maximum Considered Earthquake (MCE) | » Maximum level of earthquake ground | shaking that is considered reasonable | to design buildings to resist www.skghoshassociates.com 44S. K. Ghosh Associates Inc. IBC Ground Motion | * Maximum Considered Earthquake (MCE):— » Deterministic earthquakes (in coastal California)- best estimate of ground motion from maximum magnitude earthquakes on seismic faults with high probabilities of occurrence. IBC Ground Motion * Maximum Considered Earthquake (MCE) » 2% probability of exceedance in 50 years (approximately 2,500 year return period) where deterministic approach is not used www. skghoshassociates.comLew! 1 15 gous fe 0 a ie € Be S. K. Ghosh Associates inc. ee 2% in 60 Year 5%-Damped MCE Elastic Spectra Modified for Site Class D =,S5= 1.2(0.75)=0.9g 9 ‘spectral Acceleration, Period, 206, iad A 2% in 50 Year 5%-Damped Elastic Design Spectra (Scaled by 2/3) Sos = (2/3(0.90)= 0.609 | \\._ [S01 = (23)(0.54) = 0.389] | | 1 | | Perlod,S. K. Ghosh Associates Inc, ASCE 7-05 Figure 11.4-1: Design \ | Response Spectrum Design Response Spectrum + In ASCE 7-05, the constant velocity branch terminates at a new long-period transition period, T,, where a new branch, proportional to 4/T2, starts. + This is the constant displacement part of the design spectrum that governs seismic | | response of structures with periods beyond Te * The period T, is given on new maps for all fifty states. a www.skghoshassociates,com1997 UBC Fig. 16-3 Design Response Spectra OO www. skghoshassociates.com 488. K. Ghosh Associates Inc. ——————————————————— | |Correspondence between Ground Motion Parameters of the UBC and the IBC C,/Z of 1997 UBC = FE, of NEHRP/IBC | C,/Z of 1997 UBC = F, of NEHRP/IBC | | Correlation of Ground Motion Parameters Sys = 2.8C, SoC, (2/3)F,S, = 2.5ZN,F, (2/3)F,8, = ZNVF, Ss = (1.5)ZN,(2.5) S,=(1.5)ZN, Z20.4g Z>0.4g Sos 1.00N,F, 8p1= O.4NF, (1.00N, for Site Class B) (0.4N, for Site ClassB) | S5=1.50N,g $,=0.6N,g | www.skghoshassociates.com 498. K. Ghosh Associates Inc. Design Spectrum Structure Period -T Effect of Scaling in Western United States www. skghoshassociates.com 50S. K. Ghosh Associates Ine. Effect of Scaling in Eastern United States SEISMIC ZONE VS. SEISMIC DESIGN CATEGORY = Se ta www.skghoshassociates. com i 5t pS. K. Ghosh Associates Ine. UBC Seismic Zones Occupancy Categories 2006/2008 IBC] 2000/2003 | 4997 UBC General Occupancy | 15C Seismic | Occupancy | Description Category | Use Group | Category 1 ee ee ooeaieay | | |Sonanocoracr ul : a uliding a 5 tatoesipnsy | Ec solane | re a | ae | | [errno ay www. skghoshassociates.com 528. K. Ghosh Associates Inc, ; —SYT | SDC Based on Short-Period Response Acceleration - IBC | [ . OCCUPANCY 7 Values of sg ___ CATEGORY [iorm} im | ow | | | 8.9<0167 9 a lala] [01679 < 855 < 0.339 Bee he | 0.33g < Spe < 0.809 D 0.509 < Sys Le po po | SDC Based on 1-sec Period Response Acceleration — IBC | occuPANcY | | Values of Sy, |__ caTEGoRY jo tori] im | WV | Sp, <0.067g | A A eee eee | 0.0879 <8,,<01339 | B | B | c L 0.133g < Sp, < 0,205 c c | | 0.209 < Sa, | De | pe | pe www.skghoshassociates.com 53S. K. Ghosh Associates Ino. SDC of IBC (Note a) | | | occupancy | : Value of S, | CATEGORY Frorn | am | av $, 20.759 (ee |eea ees | esis Oreo eee! | Correspondence between UBC Seismic Zones and IBC SDC’s {1997 UBC Seismic ot | 2aze] 34 | |Zone | IBC Seismic Design | A,B Co DEF Category | | A www.skghoshassociates.com 548. K, Ghosh Associates Inc. ASCE 7-05 Section 11.6 Determination of Seismic Design Category Can be based on Sp, alone, provided + 8, <0.75g T, < 0.87, T used to calculate story drift < T, Upper-bound design base shear is used in design | Diaphragms are rigid, or for diaphragms that are flexible, vertical elements of seismic-force-resisting system spacedat | < 40 ft (12.2 m) Areas with S, > 0.75g rss ith 8,> 0789 18 shown nas www.skghoshassociates.com 558. K. Ghosh Associates Inc. Ground Motion Parameters | T.® SpifSos ‘Spectral Accelorato 7 10 Period -T seconds = EXEMPTIONS FROM SEISMIC DESIGN www.skghoshassociates.comS. K. Ghosh Associates Inc. | | | 1997 UBC Exemption from Seismic Design 1629.1 ... One- and two-family dwellings in Seismic Zone 1 need not conform to the provisions of this section. ASCE 7-05 11.1.2 Exemptions from Seismic Design + SDC A structures (ASCE 7-05 11.7.1) » Structures located where Sg <0.18g and $,<0.04g are | automatically assigned to SDC A (ASCE 7-05 11.4.1), thus exempted * Detached one- and two-family dwellings in SDC A, B, and C, or located where S, < 0.4g Detached one- and two-family wood-frame dwellings not included above, 2-stories or shorter, within limitations of IRC and constructed in accordance with it Agricultural storage structures ~ incidental human occupancy on = www.skghoshassociate 87S. K. Ghosh Associates Inc. S, <0.15g and S, <0.04g ASCE 7-05 11.1.2 Exemptions from Seismic Design * SDC A structures (ASCE 7-05 11.7.1) » Structures located where Se < 0.189 and S,<0.04g are | automatically assigned to SDC A (ASCE 7-05 11.4.1), thus exempted | + Detached one- and two-family dwellings in SDC A, B, and C, or located where S, < 0.4g + Detached one: and two-family wood-frame dwellings not included above, 2-stories or shorter, within limitations of IRC and constructed in accordance with it Agricultural storage structures — incidental human occupancy skghoshassociates.com 8ASCE 7-05 11.1.2 Exemptions from Seismic Design SDC A structures (ASCE 7-05 11.7.1) » Structures located where S.< 0.159 and S,<0.04g are | automatically assigned to SDC A (ASCE 7-06 11.4.4), thus exempted. Detached one- and two-family dwellings in SDC A, B. and C, or located whore 8, < 0.4 Detached one- and two-family wood-frame dwellings not | inclucled above, 2-stories or shorter, within limitations of | IRC and constructed in accordance with It | Agricultural storage structures ~ incidental human occupancy es8. K, Ghosh Associates Ine. ASCE 7-05 11.7 Design Requirements for. SDCA | 11.7.2 Minimum Lateral Force F, = O.0tWw, corm —p Me Ws, | O.01ws. + i a0t%2—>| = | 0.014, >| “ 5 V= 0.010 ew + wat) @ = Hh ASCE 7-05 11.7 Design Requirements for SDC A 11.7.3 Load Path Connections 11.7.4 Connection to Supports | 11.7.5 Anchorage of Concrete or Masonry Walis | www.skghoshassociates.com8. K, Ghosh Associates Ine. ANALYSIS PROCEDURES Wie ere Seismic is Bldg co > 28 Irregular NZ, What Y excupancy . | 45 \ Table 16K 7 \ as io Cail Helght > SEED S < 240 ft Ve ey eax ia Js No. ON | Use Dynamie Analysis j-M®-Y Ne__ Stories sant, | \ Ht $68 fi. \ / —_— Yes a Use Static Analysis |} www.skghoshassociates.cam 61S.K. Ghosh Associates Ine. | Seismic Analysis Procedure Selection | | [STATIC ANALYSIS ASC’ L | | PROCEDURES [SECTION | | pt Simplified Design (12.14 | |Procedure | Equivalent Lateral Force |12.8 | Procedure | | Seismic Analysis Procedure Selection DYNAMIC ANALYSIS [ASCE 7-05 | PROCEDURES [SECTION | | ee ee Modal Response 12.9 | | | Spectrum Analysis oo | [Linear Response History [161 | Analysis | \ ——— Nonlinear Response | 16.2 History Analysis | | www.skghoshassociates,com 62by 8, K. Ghosh Associates Inc, Lan te Sire Manes Seismic Analysis Procedure Seiection Table 12.6-1 | TGA | HAI www.skghoshassociates.com 63S. K, Ghosh Associates Inc. ss ee | | | Building Configuration | + Horizontal Irregularities (ASCE 7-05 Table 12.3-1) | 1. Torsional irregularity, 1a. Extreme torsional irregularity | 2, Re-entrant comers 3, Diaphragm discontinuity 4, Out-of-plane offsets 5. Nonparallel systems asa a E | Building Configuration + Vertical Irregularities (ASCE 7-05 Table 12.3-2) 1. Stiffness irregularity ~ soft story, 1a. Extreme soft story 2. Weight (mass) irregularity 3. Vertical geometric irregularity 4. in-plane discontinuity in vertical lateral-force-resisting elements 5. Discontinuity in lateral strength — weak story, 5a. Extreme weak story www.skghoshassociates.com, 64S.K. Ghosh Associates Inc. ————————————— Seismic Analysis Procedure Selection Table 12.6-1 Dynamic Analysis is required if a building meets all of the following conditions: VSDC D, E, or F v Not of light-frame construction | “Contains one of the following irregularities: “Torsional” or “Extreme Torsional” “Stifness-Soft Story”, “Stiffness ~ Extreme Soft Story”, "Weight (Mass)” or “Vartical Geometric” SIMPLIFIED STATIC LATERAL FORCE PROCEDURE www.skghoshassociates.com 658. K. Ghosh Associates Inc. | 1997 UBC Sec. 1629.8.2 ] | | ° Applicable to following structures in | Occupancy Category 4 or 5: Buildings not more than 3 stories in height excluding basements, that use | | light-frame construction | > Other buildings not more than 2 stories in| height excluding basements 1997 UBC Sec. 1630.2.3.2 ° Seismic Base Shear, V (Eq. 30-11): V=3.0C,W/R www.skghoshassociates.comS. K, Ghosh Associates Ine. 1997 UBC Sec. 1630.2.3.3 | + Vertical Distribution (Eq. 30-12) F,= 3.06, wj/R a. 1997 UBC Sec. 1630.2.3.4 + Where used, A, shail be taken equal to 0.04 times the story height of all stories \B lee www.skghoshassociates.com 67S. K. Ghosh Associates Inc. Exception to ASCE 7-05 12.4 Structural Design Basis EXCEPTION: As an alternative, the simplified | design procedure of Section 12.14 is permitted to be used in lieu of the requirements of Sections 12.1 through 12.12, subject to all of the limitations contained in Section 12.14, | Note: Section 12.13 is Foundation Design A ASCE 7-05 12.14 Simplified Design ° Simplified design procedure has been completely revised and placed ina stand-alone Section 12.14,8. K. Ghosh As: ASCE 7-05 12.14 Simplified Design * Approach limited to certain structural systems, so | as to avoid problems arising from omission of drift check for drift-controlled systems (@.g., steel moment frames) | * Procedure allowed for bearing wall and building frame systems, provided several prescriptive requirements are met, which result in a torsion- | resistant regular layout of lateral-force-resisting " ASCE 7-05 12.14.1.1 Applicability of Simplified Design 4, The structure shall qualify for Occupancy Category | or Il The site class shall not be E or F. 3. Structure shall not exceed 3 stories in height above grade. 4, The seismic-force resisting system shall be either a bearing wall system or building frame system. ay a ara www.skghoshassociates.com 695. K. Ghosh Associate: | ASCE 7-05 12.14.1.1 Applicability of Simplified Design 5. Structure shall have at least two lines of lateral resistance in each of two principal axis directions, 6. Atleast one line of resistance shalll be provided on each side of the center of mass in each direction, | 7. For structures with flexible diaphragms, overhangs beyond the outside line of shear walls or braced frames shall satisfy: asdis ASCE 7-05 12.14.1.1 Applicability of Simplified Design = depth of diaphragm parallel to forces being considored at the tine of vertical i resistance closestto tho edge | | | L |_| a= distance perpendicular to force being considered! from the extreme edge of the laphragm to the line of vertical resistance | closest to that edge www.skghoshassociates.com8. K. Ghosh Associates Inc. ASCE 7-05 12.14.1.1 Applicability of Simplified Design i 8 For buildings with a diaphragm that is not | flexible, distance between the center of rigidity and center of mass parallel to each principal axis shall not exceed 15% of greatest width of diaphragm parallel to that axis. aA A | ASCE 7-05 12.14.1.1 Applicability of Simplified Design — Fig. 1244-1) | e, $0.18b, www skghoshassociates.com ra8. K. Ghosh Associates Inc. | ASCE 7-05 12.14.1.1 Applicability of | Simplified Design i 2g | | ai+Nk dj 22.5(005 +7 | jl i Yk,d? + Yk, a? = | i=l | N x ASCE 7-05 12.14.1.1 Applicability of Simplified Design Equation in Condition 8 need not be checked if: + Arrangement of walls or braced frames is | symmetric about each principal axis direction. |» Distance between the two most separated lines of | walls or braced frames is at least 90% of the | | dimension of the structure perpendicular to that | axis direction, Stiffness along each line considered above is at ig least 33% of total stiffness in that axis direction. www. skghoshassociates.com 728. K. Ghosh Associates Inc. C. with the principal axes. 10. The simplified design procedure shall be used along each principal axis of bul est ES | — ASCE 7-05 12.14.1.1 Applicability of | Simplified Design | 11. System irregularities caused by in-plane or out-of- | plane offsets of lateral-force-resisting elements shall not be permitted, (Note: Exception for two-story buildings of light- frame construction). 12. The lateral-load-resistance of any story shall not be less than 80% of that of the story above. ASCE 7-05 12.14.11 Applicability of | Simplified Design | 8, Lines of resistance of the lateral-force- resisting system shall be oriented at angles of no more than 15 degree from alignment | www. skghoshassociates. com 738. K, Ghosh aciates Ine, Simplified Design | S5 $1.59 F, is permitted to be taken as 1.0 for rock sites 4.4 for soil sites or determined as for non-simplified design Simplified Design « Site may be considered as rock if there is no more than 40 ft of soil | between rock surface and bottom | of spread footing or mat foundation. www.skghoshassociates, com8. K. Ghosh Associates Ine. Simplified Design | F = 1.0 for one-story buildings 4.1 for two-story buildings 41.2 for three-story buildings W = effective seismic weight Simplified Design Wx Fev ay Wx= portion of effective seismic weight of structure at level x. p=10 0,528 www skghoshassociates.com 758. K, Ghosh Associates Ine. EQUIVALENT LATERAL FORCE PROCEDURE 1997 UBC Sec. 1630.2 Static Force | Procedure | “shos Perea" “Long Peto Structures eee ie ar | 2 | a N STRUCTURE PERIOD A www.skghoshassociates.com 768. K, Ghosh Associates |nc. Minimum Design Base Shear | | All Seismic Zones / Seismic Design Categories Vv, nin = 0.11 C, 1 W 4997 UBC. Vonin = 0.044 Spg le Ww 2000/2003 IBC = 0.01 W ASCE 7-05/2006 IBC BSS = 0.0445,.1W 2009 IBC : i = Minimum Seismic Base Shear Section 12.8.1.1 with Supplement No. 2 22:73 Sor ee eer ae a rox, Rose. Minimum Seismic Base Shear ] For special reinforced concrete moment frames, 0.016h°%> 9/8 h 2 (70.31)"9 = 113 ft a = www.skghoshassociates.com 80Concrete SMRF building - R=8, [= 1.0 | Height = 120 ft, Sps = 1.00, Sp; = 0.40 | T= 0.016(120)°" = 1.19 sec | So 0.40 | TRI) rarer» 4? 5508. = 1.00 _ 9 495 Ri 8/4 C, 20.0448 :c1= 0.044 Governs ©, 20.01 Does not govern c. ASCE 7-05 Supplement No. 2 Q: Where does ASCE officially announce ASCE 7-05 Supplement No, 2? A: http://content.seinstitute. org/files/pdf/ | SupplementNo2ofthe2005EditionofASCE7.pdf www skghoshassociates.com 8S. K. Ghosh Associates Inc. ——— | Q: A: for ASCE 7-05 Supplement No. 2 | | Q: Does ASCE 7-05 Supplement No. 2 minimum base shear need to be | considered for drift determination? { A: Yes, Section 12.8.6.1 requires that all | of the requirements of Section 12.8 be satisfied for the purpose of computing IQ rift. x 5 a hh | Q: A: for ASCE 7-05 Supplement No. 2 Q: |s ASCE 7-05 going to be published with errata and Supplement No. 2 incorporated? A: “Additional printings will to the extent possible, include as extra pages the supplements and errata, However there's @ conscious decision not to integrate them directly into the text so as to minimize confusion between one book and another.” www.skghoshassociates.com 82,8. K. Ghosh Associates Inc. l | Minimum Design Base Shear | ° Seismic Zone 4/ S,20.6g @ ASCE 7-05 12.8.1 Seismic Base Shear + ASCE 7-05 Eq, 12.8-6 (second expression for minimum design base shear in equivalent lateral force procedure) applies to structures located where S, 2 06g. 1997 UBC Eq. (30-8) applies in Seismic | Zone 4 (roughly equivalent to structures located where S$, 20.69). skghoshassociates.com 83| ASCE 7-05 12.8.1 | Design Base Shear V=C.W Sor cso ° (RI = Sol TRI) 20.01 23 forT T, a where S,20.6g z& a ASCE 7-05 12.8 Equivalent Lateral Force | Procedure, with Supplement No. 2 4 y= Sor. AV 0,044 SW ass, | = 288i, where 8 20, YR 6a Period, www.skghoshassociates.com 84K. Ghosh Associate: re Seismic Importance Factor, | | ° Used to amplify....design forces | as a means of controlling damage | | and producing “enhanced” performance in Seismic Use Groups Il and Il! | ee Seismic Importance Factor, | — | Occupancy Category Importance Factor) ASCE TIBC ae (UBC) | asce7 | UBC | 1 ol | 100 | 100 | (4,8) Le = | 2s | 1.00 (2, 3) = (as : 1.50 1.28 { (ty { : www. skghoshassociates.comS. K. Ghosh Associates Inc. —— | IBC vs. UBC Response Modification Factor, R ° 1997 UBC (Strength-level | earthquake forces) | Table 16-N | | Bearing wall system R=4.5 Special moment resisting frame system R=8.5 IBC / UBC Response Modification Factor, R * ASCE 7-06 (Strength-level earthquake forces) Table 12.21 | | R= 5 — Bearing wall system with special reinforced concrete or masonry shear walls R= 8 - Special moment resisting frame system www.skghoshassociates.comS.K, Ghosh Associates Ine. eS I ] Structure Period Calculated by...... 1) Approximate Formulae 2) Rational Analysis using structural properties and deformational characteristics of resisting elements in a properly substantiated analysis Approximate Period Formulae C; (h,) 1997 UBC (30-8) | ee | Lateral Force Resisting System | Cc; } Sigel Moment Frames | 0.035 ste t Concrete Moment Frames | Eooentically Braced Stes! | 0.030 Frames | | All other buildings | 0.020 = SS www.skghoshassociates.com 87S. K. Ghosh Associates Ins, i | ASCE 7-05 12.8.2.1 Approximate Fundamental Period | replaces T, = Ch, ASCE 7-05 Table 12.8-2 Values of Approximate Period Parameters C, and x Structure Type ——~*d Moment resisting frame systems of stealin Which the frames resist 100 percent of the required seismic force and are not | enclosed or adjoined by more rigid components that will prevent the frames | from deflecting when subjected to seismic forces | Momont resisting frame oystoms of 7] |reinforced concrete in which the frames | | | resist 100 percent of the required seismic 0.016 | [more rigid components that will prevent | 0.044) | | [force andaronotenciosed oredjomed by | (fers: | 08 | the frames from deflocting when subjected | to soismie forces l ee | www.skghoshassociates.com 888. K. Ghosh Ass ASCE 7-05 Table 12.8-2 Values of Approximate Period Parameters C, and x (cont'd) —————— Structure Type [ | 0.03 Eccentrically braced steel frames | (For Sl: | 0.75 0.07) a All other structural systems (For Si: | 0.75 1997 UBC 1630.2.2/ ASCE 7-05 12.8.2.1 Approximate Fundamental Period of SMRF Ta(sec.} |= stant RE www.skghoshassociates.com 8gS.K. Ghosh Associates Approximate Period Formula (Optional - 1997 UBC ) For structures with concrete or masonry shear walls, C= O4NA, A. = TA,10.2 + (Dg/h, 7 Replaced by a different formula in ASCE 7-05 S i ie Upper Limit on T by "Rational Analysis" | ASCE 7-05 | 1997 UBC TS4.3Ty Zone 4 $1.4 Ty Zones 1,23 www.skghoshassociates.com 30§. K, Ghosh Associates Inc. | Upper Limit on T by “Rational | | Analysis" | | | —masarn | |e Costlictont ©, | | Acceleration (Soo) ae nS | 14 | | 7 1 | | ‘s | z , ow | | o J pots: For ait analysis, uppor limit on calculated T does | eae a ASCE 7-05 12.7.2 Effective Seismic Weight vec Ww | W = totaldead load + | + Warehouses. 25% lve i + Buildings with partitions... 10 pst | + Flat roof snow load > 30 pef. ., 20% design | snow load ** | + Permanent equipment 100% dead | | UBC leaves this upto local jusdictions | . www.skghoshassociates.com 88. K, Ghosh Associates Ino, IBC vs. UBC | Vertical Force Distribution | 2009 1Be 1997 UBC | wyhk wh. | F, =e F, =e X(v-F) | | un San) \ where where T $0.5 sec...k =4 T 50.7 sec., F=0 T22.5 sec... T>0.7 sec. F, =0.07TV i = ee" IBC vs. UBC | Vertical Force Distribution 2009 IBC 1997 UBC. fe Ft = oovty, wwiiskghoshassociates.cam 92www. skghoshassociates. com 93 es| ASCE 7-05 12.8.4 Horizontal Distribution of Forces * Rigid diaphragms » Seismic story shear is to be distributed to elements of seismic-force-resisting system based on stiffness of vertical-resisting elements | » Flexible diaphragms » Seismic story shear is to be distributed to elements of seismic-force-resisting system i based on tributary areas ASCE 7-05 12.8.4 Horizontal Distribution of Forces | * Torsion » Torsional moment due to difference in location of center of mass and center of resistance must be consictered for rigid diaphragms + Accidental torsion » For rigid diaphragms, must be included in | addition to the torsional moment + Displacement of center of mass = 5% building dimension § perpendicuiar to ditection of applied forces Ee a a wow skghoshassociates.com 948. K. Ghosh Associates Inc, 7h ASCE 7 12.8.4.3 Amplification of Accidental Torsional Moments ° For structures assigned to SDC C, D, E, or F, where Type 1a or 4b irregularity exists ASCE 7-05 Section 12.8.4.3 does not require that the torsional and accidental torsional moments be amplified for torsionally irregular structures of light-frame construction |" This exception is not to be found in 1997 UBC 5 | ee lee ASCE 7-05 12.8 Story Drift Determination (A) Lateral displacement of one level relative to the next level above or below www.skghoshassociates.com 958. K. Ghosh Associates Inc. a i ASCE 7-05 12.8. Story Drift Determination (A) Ay #8, * Bet = Ag where... ASCE 7-05 | 1997 UBC 6 Co il | o-OrRA www.skghoshassociates.com 96S.K. Ghosh Associates ine. — ASCE 7-05 12.8. Story Brift Determination {A) C, = displacement amplification factor {ASCE 7-08 Table 12.2-1) 8,0 * elastic analysis displacement = allowable story drift (ASCE 7-05 Table 12.12-4) | = occupancy importance factor (ASCE 7-05 Table 11.5- 1) | 5 = Allowable Story Drift (A, ) ASCE 7-05 Table 12.12-4 Buliding Occupancy Category [ torn Buildings $4 stories in| hoightiother than masonry; | Nonstructural elements | 0.026n,, | 0.020. | o.04Gh, | destaned to accommodate story drift | Masonry cantiovershear | 0.010h,, | 0.010h,, | aaadh,, wall buildings I Other masonry shear walls | 0.007n,, Fl onan) bulge | | BAY cs oazah,. | o0ish,, | 01, ERE h, = Story height below vn = www. skghoshassociates.com 78. K. Ghosh Associates Inc. ———————————— | Allowable Story Drift (A, ) | 1997 UBC | | bg = 0.020 h,, for T® 0.7 see | = 0.025 hy, for T < 0.7 see. | hy, = Story height below level x | | REDUNDANCY | wu .skghoshassociates.com 988. K. Ghosh A’ssociates Inc. Redundancy Factor (p) | 1997 UBC 2000/2003 180. | max p, ovet lower two-thirds of | p= max p, over entire building bulge nett asp 40 | wanes | 2» Fras area of ground floor in sq. ft | A= area of diaphragm supported by lateral force resisting elements in story | in eq. ft | Redundancy Factor (p) * For structures with seismic-force- resisting system consisting entirely of special moment frames, 1997 UBC 2000/2003 IBC ] ; SDCD | pst.25 | Zone4| p< 4.28 | L | SDCEF | p< 1.10 www.skghoshassociates.com 998. K. Ghosh Associates inc. Section 12.3.4.2 Redundancy Factor, p, for Seismic Design Categories D through F + New redundancy provisions adopted into ASCE 7-05. * Lack of redundancy is..... when failure of a component is failure of entire system. * Logical way to determine lack of redundancy is to check whether a component's failure results in an unacceptable amount of story strength loss or in the development of extreme torsional irregularity. i = Section 12.3.4.2 Redundancy Factor, p, for Seismic Design Categories D through F In ASCE 7-08, p = 1.0 or 1.3, depending on | whether or not an individual element can be removed from the lateral-force-resisting- system without: + Causing the remaining structure to suffer a reduction of story strength of more than 33%, or * Creating an extreme torsional irregularity, | a www.skghoshassociates.com 1008.K. Ghosh Associates Inc. Section 12.3.4.2 Continued, 2nd condition for which p = 1.0; If structure is regular in plan and there are at least 2 bays of seismic force-resisting perimeter framing on each side of the structure in each orthogonal direction at | each story resisting > 35% of the base shear. Section 12.3.4.2 Continued... * No. of bays of shear wall = length of shear wall/ story height * For light-framed construction, No. of bays of shear wall = 2x length of shear wali! story height www.skghoshassociates.com 1048. K. Ghosh Associates Inc. aa Section 12.3.4.2 Redundancy Factor, p, for Seismic Design Categories D through F p = 1.0 for the following: | 1. Structures assigned to SDC B and C, 2, Drift calculation and P-delta effects. 3, Design of nonstructural components, | 4. Design of nonbuilding structures, not similar to buildings. | Section 12.3.4.2 Redundancy Factor, p, for Seismic Design Categories D through F(cont.) p = 1.0 for the following: | | 5. Design of collector elements, splices and their connections for which load combinations with overstrength are used, 6. Design of members or connections where load combinations with overstrength are required for design. x] Diaphragm loads determined using Eq. 12.10-1. | 8. Structures with damping systems designed in accordance with Chapter 18, ze www.skghoshassociates.com 102S. K, Ghosh Associates Ino. ALTERNATIVES TO ASCE 7-05 Z 5 1613.6.1 Assumption of Flexible Diaphragm Is any of the following true? 1- & 2-family awellng of] Vertical elarenis one ofthe folowing light-frame constuction | «Steel braced frames Four conditions i 2008 |‘CO™Posite steel and concrete braced | Four conditions in 2008 | *Composte see! and concrete braced | weeeclon erst | 1 sesior conga oe Cones, atone or compe shea vate fssume Feb i dghrag wood (O_O —[ Beene Fonte] structural panels oF [See Next Sido] [ Sie hmm) Untopped size Bailes) ‘Assume Rigid | dscting? te aS W) ®) eo Pe | ro * Concrete slab? (f)-»| £8 and no horzontat @~+ a START * Concrete filed i cx | | regularities? 5 www.skghoshassociates.com 1038. K. Ghosh Associates Inc. ASCE 7-05 Figure 12.3-1 Definition for Flexible Diaphragm SS | SER waxmunoirteacn — | Gee Losows, Seniseon on) a a svenage one ot s ete: Dtephragm i xlbef M100 > 2 (ADVE) Note: Per 2006 IBC Section 1602.1, diaphragm is rigid if MDD s 2(ADVE) a = 1613.6.1 Definition for Flexible Diaphragm (Prescriptive) 1613.6.1 Assumption of flexible diaphragm. Add the following text at the end of Section 12.3.1.1 of ASCE 7: Diaphragms constructed of wood structural panels or untopped steel decking shall also be permitted to be idealized as flexible, provided four given conditions are met... == | www.skghoshassociates.com 104.S. K, Ghosh Associates Inc. 1613.6.1 Definition for Flexible Diaphragm Condition #1 | Toppings of concrete or similar materials are not placed over wood structural panel diaphragms except for nonstructural toppings no greater than 1 % inches (38 MM) thick. feel Be 1613.6.1 | Definition for Flexible Diaphragm Condition #2: Each line of vertical elements of the lateral force-resisting system complies with the allowable story | drift of Table 12.12-1 Be www.skghoshassociates.com 1058. K. Ghosh Associates Inc. -. 1613.6.4 Definition for Flexible Diaphragm Condition #3: | Vertical elements of the lateral-force- resisting system are light-framed walls sheathed with wood structural panels rated for shear resistance or steel sheets. 1613.6.1 Definition for Flexible Diaphragm Condition #4 | Portions of wood structural panel diaphragms that cantilever beyond the vertical elements of the lateral- force-resisting system are designed in accordance with Section 2305.2.5. www.skghoshassociate: 108S.K. Ghosh Ass’ lates Inc. Say EEE 1613.6.2 | Additional Seismic Force-Resisting | Systems for Isolated Structures For isolated structures assigned to SDC D, E, or F, OCBFs and OMFs of steel are permitted to be part of the SFRS up to a height limit of 160 feet (48.8 m) provided: 1. Ril as defined in ASCE 7-05 Chapter 17 is taken as tand | 2. OCBFs and OMFs are designed in accordance with AISC 344 | —--7SS 1613.6.3 Automatic fire sprinkler systems » Automatic fire sprinkler systems designed and installed in | accordance with NFPA 13 shail be | deemed to meet the requirements of Section 13.6.8 of ASCE 7. www.skghoshassoviates.comS.K. Ghosh Associates Inc. 1613.6.4 Autoclaved aerated concrete (AAC) masonry shear wall design coefficients and system limitations Ordinary reinforced AAC masonry shear walls | R=2,C,=2, Q= 2-1/2 spc BNL | SDC C 35 ft SDC D, E, F NP | = = 1613.6.4 Autoclaved aerated concrete (AAC) masonry shear wail design coefficients and system limitations + Ordinary plain (unreinforced) AAC masonry shear walls Re 1-1/2, Cy = 4-412, Q= 2-4/2 | SDC BNL SDC C, D, E, FNP www.skghoshassociates.com 1081613.6.5 Seismic controls of elevators * Seismic switches in accordance with Section 8.4.10 of ASME A17.1 shall be | deemed to comply with Section 13.6.10.3 of ASCE 7 1613.6.7 Minimum distance for building separation Maximum inelastic response displacement | dy = Cadmax (Equation 16-45) i www. skghoshassociates.com 1094613.6.7 Building Separat Note difference between 5, and by ‘The deflections of Level x at the center of mass (12.8.8), Baal | byt CaSmax! ! (Equation 16-44) dgacz the maximum displacement at Level x computed assuming A, = 1 (12.848)S.K. Ghosh Associates Inc. | 1613.6.7 Building Separation 10" separation A Separation of Two Adjacent Bulldings gm Q:A: for Building Separation Q: ASCE 7-05 Section 12,12.3 contains the language “sufficient to avoid damaging contact.” What is damaging contact? A? To avoid any contact at all, the separation distance would have to be the arithmetic sum of By ANd Syo, To avoid damaging contact, ASCE 7 allows the separation distance to be the statistical sum of By, and dy, which is less than he arithmetic sum, = ‘www.skghoshassociates.com i5S. K. Ghosh Associates Inc. | Q:A: for Building Separation @: Ido not understand the logic of requiring less separation between two buildings on the same property than between two identical buildings on different sides of the property line. | : Q:A: for Building Separation | Ad The first provision is concerned with damaging contact from pounding of buildings belonging to presumably the | same owner. The property line setback requirement is based on consideration that one owner should not encroach onto another property. = i www.skghoshassociates.com 4128. K. Ghosh Associates Inc. Ee 1613.6.7 Minimum distance for building separation Adjacent buildings on the same property shall be separated by a distance not less than dyr, determined by Equation 16-46. Bur = Vm)? +62)? (Equation 16-45) | Where By Sg = The maximum inelastic response displacements of the adjacent buildings in accordance with Equation 16-4: I 1613.6.7 Minimum distance for building separation Where a structure adjoins a property line | hot common to a public way, the structure shall also be set back from the property line by not fess than the maximum inelastic response displacement, 5,, of that structure. | Aa B www.skghoshassaciates.com 113wv . Inspection by . Special Inspection by | . Structural Observation by 8. K, Ghosh Associates Inc. 2009 IBC - Chapter 17 Theme... to ensure quality materials and workmanship of construction through... Special Inspection... Structural Observation... & ... Testing 2009 IBC - Three Tier Inspection / Observation Building Official Sec. 110 Certified Special Inspector Sec. 1704 Registered Design Professional Sec. 1710 | www. skghoshassociates.com 414S. K. Ghosh Associates Inc. a 2009 IBC — Chapter 17 ° 1701.3 ~ Use of “second-hand” materials permitted... if they meet Same requirements as for new materials 2008 IBC - Chapter 17 ° 1702 ~ Definitions * 1703 ~ Approvals ° 1704 ~ Special Inspections is www. skghoshassociates.com 158. K, Ghosh Associates Inc. 2009 IBC — Chapter 17 Special inspection applies principally to structural framing system of building Special inspection program to be administered and enforced by building official Special inspection is in addition to that performed by jurisdiction building inspector = 2009 IBC — Chapter 17 + Special inspector to be employed by owner or registered design professional...not contractor Special inspector to be qualified and demonstrate qualifications to building official for type of construction requiring special inspection www. iccsafe.org/e/certsearch.htm! Search for an |CC-certified professional veww.skghoshassociates.compo S.K. Ghosh Associates Inc, 2009 IBC - Chapter 17 ° Special inspection not required for.., » Minor work when approved by building official » Construction not required to be designed by registered professional » Occupancies constructed in accordance with International Residential Code (IRC) and Group U occupancies » Work performed by an approved fabricator = 2009 IBC - Chapter 17 * Duties of Special inspector » Review structural details and perform inspections to verify compliance with approved construction documents » Keep accurate records of inspections » Furnish inspection reports to building official and registered design professional www.skghoshassociates.com "7S. K. Ghash Associates Inc. 2009 IBC — Chapter 17 | + Duties of Special Inspector (cont.) » Notify contractor of observed discrepancies for correction » Notify building official and registered design professional of uncorrected discrepancies » Submit final inspection report to building official and registored design professional 2009 IBC - Chapter 17 * 1704.2 - Inspection of fabricators » Special inspection required for shop fabrication } » Except... Approved Fabricators Fabricator has an approved independent Inspection or quality control agency to conduct periodic in-plant inspections that, ensure conformanes with the agency's approved quality control program www.skghoshassociates.com 1182009 IBC - Chapter 17 * 1704.3 ~ Steel construction + 1704.4 — Concrete construction * 1704.5 - Masonry construction * 1704.6 - Wood construction + 1704.7 - Soils + 1704.8 - Driven deep foundations + 1704.9 ~ cast.in-place deep foundations + 1704.10 ~ Helical pile foundations 1704.11 — Vertical masonry foundation elements foo. 2009 IBC - Chapter 17 1704.12 - Sprayed fire-resistant material 1704.13 — Mastic and intumescent fire-resistant coatings 1704.14 ~ Exterior insulation and finish systems 1704.15 ~ Special cases 1704.16 ~ Special inspection for smoke control§. K, Ghosh Associates Ino, 2009 IBC — Chapter 17 | + 4705 - Statement of Special Inspections | 1705.1 General. Where special inspection or testing is required by 1704, 1707 or 1708, the RDP | in responsible charge shall prepare a statement of special inspections in accordance with 1708 for submittal by the permit applicant (see 1704.1.1) x = 2009 IBC ~— Chapter 17 + 1705 - Statement of Special Inspections 4705.2 Content of statement of special inspections, | Statement shall identify the following: 4. The materials, systems, components and work required to have special inspection or testing by the building official or by the registered design professional responsible for each portion of the work 2, The type and extent of each special inspection. 3. The type and extent of each test. woww.skghoshassociates.com 1208. K. Ghosh Associ iates Ino, poe 2009 IBC — Chapter 17 |+ 1708 ~ Statement of Special Inspections 1708.2 Content of statement of special inspections. Statement shall identify the following: 4. Additional requirements for each special inspection or testing for seismic or wind resistance as specified in Section 1705.3, | 1705.4, 1707 or 1708 iz | 2009 IBC — Chapter 17 | 1705 — Statement of Special Inspections | 1708.2 Content of statement of special inspections. Statement shall identify the following: 5. For each type of special inspection, identification as to whether it will be Continuous special inspection or periodic special inspection, www.skghoshassociates.com 1218. K, Ghosh Associates ino. 2009 IBC - Chapter 17 + 1705 ~ Statement of Special Inspections 4708.3 Seismic resistance, Statement shall include: | » 1708.3.1 - Seismic-force-resisting systems of buildings assigned to Seismic Design Categories C, | DE&F | » 1706,3.2 - Designated seismic systems of buildings assigned to Seismic Design Categories D, E & F | » 1705.3.3 - Additional systems and components in structures assigned to SDC C » 1705.3.4 - Additional systems and components in structures assigned to SDC D » 1708.3.8 - Additional systems and components in Mite structures assigned to SDC E or F = 2009 IBC - Chapter 17 + 1705 — Statement of Special Inspections 1705.3 Seismic resistance. » Exceptions + Light wood framing and light-framed cold-formed steel framing. + Shortperiod spectral response acceleration S,, 05g + structure not exceeding 35 ft in height www.skghoshassociates.com 422S. K. Ghosh Associates Inc. —— 2009 IBC - Chapter 17 * 1705 ~ Statement of Special Inspections 1708.3 Seismic resistance. » Exceptions (cont,) * Reinforced concrete or reinforced masonry structures... * Short-period spectral response acceleration Sy < 08g * structure not exceeding 25 {tin height = ee 2009 IBC — Chapter 17 * 1705 ~ Statement of Special Inspections 1705.3 Seismic resistance, » Exceptions (cont.) » Detached R-3 (one- and two-family dwellings... "structure not exceeding two stories in height * structure without structural irregularities oe www.skghoshassociates.com 423S. K. Ghosh Associates Ine. 2009 IBC ~ Chapter 17 > 1705 ~ Statement of Special inspections 1705.3 Seismic resistance. » 1708.3.6 Statement to identify... | + Applicable designated seismic systems and seismic-forco- | resisting systems + Additional special inspections and testing required by 41707 and 4708 2009 IBC — Chapter 17 + 1705 - Statement of Special Inspections 1705.4 Wind resistance. » Applies to buildings assigned to... * Wind Exposure Category B with basic wind speed = 120 mph = Wind Exposure Categories C & D with basic wind speed 2 110 mph... note EXCEPTIONS! www.skghoshassociates.com 1245. K. Ghosh Associates Inc. $$ 2009 IBC - Chapter 17 * 1705 ~ Statement of Special Inspections 1705.4 Wind resistance. » 1705.4.1 Statement to identify... * Main wind -force-resisting systems * Wind-resisting components subject to special inspection 2009 IBC ~ Chapter 17 | |+ 1705 — Statement of Special Inspections 1705.4 Wind resistance, » 1705.4.2 — Detailed requirements * Roof cladding and framing connections * Walll connections to roof and floor diaphragms and framing * Roof and floor diaphragm systems * Vertical wind-force-resisting systems * Wind-force-resisting system connections to foundation * Fabrication and installation of components and En| 1S8emblies to meet required Impact resistance y = a www.skghoshassociates.com 1258. K, Ghosh Associates Inc. 2009 IBC - Chapter 17 + 1706 — Special Inspections for Wind Resistance Buildings and structures in areas with: » Wind Exposure Category B with basic wind speed = 420 mph » Wind Exposure Categories C & D with basic wind speed 2 110 mph A = eee 2009 IBC — Chapter 17 * 1706 — Special Inspections for Wind Resistance » Continuous special inspection of any field gluing operations for structural wood for elements of MWERS » Periodic special inspection for nailing / bolting / anchoring / and other fastening of components of structural wood in MWFRS. Note exception, wwrw.skghoshassociates.com 1268. K. Ghosh Associates inc. ee | 2009 IBC — Chapter 17 + 1706 — Special Inspections for Wind Resistance » Periodic special inspection during welding } operations of elements of MWFRS in a cold- i formed steel light-frame construction » Periodic special inspection for screw attachment, bolting, anchoring and other fastening of | elements of MWFRS in a cold-formed steel light- frame construction E 2009 IBC — Chapter 17 | + 1707 — Special Inspections for Seismic Resistance » Seismic-force-resisting system... buildings assigned to Seismic Design Categories C, D, E, or F | | » Designated seismic systems in structures assigned to SDC D, E, or F » Architectural, mechanical and electrical | components in structures assigned to SDC C, D, E, or F that are required in 1707.7 and 1707.8 | www. skghoshassociates.com 127S. K, Ghosh Associates Ine. | | 2009 IBC - Chapter 17 +» 1707 ~ Special Inspections for Seismic Resistance » Special inspection for structural steel according to AISC 341-2005 2009 IBC - Chapter 17 + 1707 — Special Inspections for Seismic | Resistance » Periodic special inspection for nailing / bolting | anchoring / and other fastening of components (drag struts, braces and hold-downs) for structural wood. Note exception. » Continuous special inspection of any field gluing operations for structural wood glued builtup | members = La www. skghoshassociates.com 128S.K. Ghosh Associate ea 2009 IBC — Chapter 17 | * 1708 — Structural Testing for Seismic Resistance » Applies to buildings assigned to Seismic Design Categories C, D, E & F » Depending on Seismic Design Category... specific testing required for | seismi force-resisting systems and designated seismic systems 2009 IBC — Chapter 17 * 1709 — Contractor responsibility » Written contractor's statement of responsibility to be submitted to building official and owner prior to beginning work » Statement of responsibility to include acknowledgement of awareness of special requirements contained in the statement of special inspection. g a eee www.skghoshassociates.com 1295. K. Ghosh Associates Inc. 2009 IBC - Chapter 17 « 1710 - Structural Observations » To be performed by Registered Design Professional » To be provided for structures assigned to Seismic | Design Categories D, £ & F... under specific conditions » To be provided for structures with design wind speed greater than 110 mph... classified in Occupancy Category Ill or IV... height greater than 75 tt » To he provided when specifically requested by BAN esistered design professional or building orci aren 2009 IBC - Chapter 17 1711 — Design Strengths of Materials 1712 — Alternative test Procedure 1713 ~ Test Safe Load 1714 — In-Situ Load Tests 1715 — Preconstruction Load Tests 1716 ~ Material and Test Standards www.skghoshassociates.com 130S.K. Ghosh clates Ine. SS FOUNDATIONS 2009 IBC — Chapter 18 * 1801 - General » The permissible soil pressure and permissible pile capacity values given in Chapter 18 are based on allowable stress. design www. skghoshassociates. com 1318. K, Ghosh Associates Inc. 2009 IBC - Chapter 18 | | * 1802 — Definitions | » Provides dofinitions of words and terms used in Chapter 18 for the purpose of | this chapter. | 2009 IBC ~ Chapter 18 + 1803 - Geotechnical Investigations » Addresses when a soils investigation report is required and who it needs to be completed by » The building official is allowed the discretion of requiring that the report be prepared by a registered design professional » In certain situations, the building official is NOT allowed to waive the requirement of a registered A design professional www.skghoshassociates.com 1328. K. Ghosh Associates Inc. ee 2009 IBC ~ Chapter 18 | * 1803 - Geotechnical Investigations » Important exception allows the building official some flexibility in not requi ing a soils report where the soil conditions ofa site are already known from other soll reports a = 2009 IBC — Chapter 18 * 1804 — Excavation, Grading and Fill » Some of the requirements in this section are from UBC Appendix Chapter 33 S| www.skghoshassociates.com 1338. K, Ghosh Associates Ino. 2009 iBC — Chapter 18 + 1805 - Dampproofing and Waterproofing » This section contains detailed requirements | for dampproofing and water-proofing of foundations —— 2009 IBC — Chapter 18 » 1806 - Presumptive Load-Bearing Values of Soils » Allowable load-bearing, lateral bearing and lateral sliding values are listed that can be assumed when there is no soils report » The values are different than in the UBC » The tabulated values are higher, but do not include the UBC increase for depth and width; so overall they are a bit lower and larger footings should result www. skghoshasso« 1342009 IBC Table 1806.2 “Presumptive” Bearing Allowables sera Soil Ty IBc ii Type | | | Crystalline bedrock [12000 | 4000 | Sedimentary / foliated rock 4000 | 2000 | Sandy gravel / gravel | 3000 2000 | il Sand / silty sand / clayey sand Fan nena | silty gravel / clayey gravel | i Clay / I lay gendy, clay / silty clay 4500 4000 | clayey silt | ed wisth/dopth of footing 2009 IBC ~ Chapter 18 + 1807 — Foundations Walls, Retaining Walls and Embedded Posts and Poles > Includes the prescriptive design provisions and design tables for foundation walls and retaining walls » Includes design provisions for posts and poles embedded in earth or in concrete footings www.skghoshassociates.com 1368. K, Ghosh Asso 2009 IBC ~ Chapter 18 | + 1807 - Foundations Walls, Retaining Walls and Embedded Posts and Poles Tables 180 and 1807.1.6.3(4 | + Concrete walls are addressed in Table 1807.1.6.2, based on lateral soil load. | + Tables 1807.1.6.3(1) through 1807.1.6.2(4) are for | masonry walls, based on lateral soil load. Tables address walls up to 10 ft in height. + Walls are laterally supported at top and bottom, =. No special inspection required (1704.4 and 1704.5), | 2009 iBC — Chapter 18 * 1808 — Foundations » Addresses both shallow and deep | foundations » Shallow foundations to also satisfy Section | 1809 » Deep foundations to also satisfy Section 1810 Be ‘wonw.skghoshassociates.com 1368. K. Ghosh Associates Inc. EE | 2009 IBC ~ Chapter 18 * 1808 - Foundations | » Foundations can be sized based on design loads from Strength Design or from ASD load combinations » Bearing capacity of soil is based on ASD » Additional requirements are given for foundations, such as setback from slopes = | 2009 IBC — Chapter 18 * 1808 — Foundations Reduction of foundation overturning effects in accordance with ASCE 7-05 Section 12.13.4 {not in 1997 UBC) » ASCE 7-05 does not permit the 26% reduction for inverted pendulum or cantilevered column type structures » ASCE 7-05 allows only 10% reduction for modal analysis www.skghoshassociates.com 137S. K. Ghosh Associates Inc. fo cco 2009 IBC ~ Chapter 18 | > 1808 - Foundations | Seismic Requirements | |» Seetion 1808 for SDCs C through F | » ACI 318-05 Sections 21.12.1 through 21.12.4 for SDCs D through F » Note exceptions | 2009 IBC - Chapter 18 * 1809 — Shallow Foundations » To be built on undisturbed soil, compacted soil, controlled tow-strength material » 12 inches minimum depth | » 12 inches minimum width » Additional requirements are given, such as ez = frost protection and location a wwww.skghoshassociates.com 138S. K, Ghosh Associates Inc, 2009 IBC — Chapter 18 * 1809 - Shallow Foundations *1809.7 ~ Prescriptive footings for light-frame construction *1809.8 — Plain concrete footings "1808.9 ~ Masonry-unit footings "1809.10 - Pier and curtain wall foundations "1809.11 — Steel grillage footings 1809.12 — Timber footings 2009 IBC ~ Chapter 18 * 1810 — Deep Foundations » Geotechnical investigation required » Special inspection required » Design forces and displacements need to be determined by a registered design professional considering nonlinear interaction of shaft and soil | » Required detailing is based on the Seismic Design Category FF oe rs cea www.skghashassociates.com8. K, Ghash Associates Inc. 2009 IBC — Chapter 18 | + 1810 — Deep Foundations Concrete Piles \ » Cast-in-place or grouted-in-place + Regular + Micropiles » Precast + Precast prestressed + Precast nonprestressed 2009 IBC — Chapter 18 * 1810 — Deep Foundations Steel Piles » H-piles » Steel pipes and tubes » Helical piles, Timber Piles | wuww.skghoshassosiates.com 140S. K. Ghosh Associates Ino. 2009 IBC — Chapter 18 ° 1810 ~ Deep Foundations Micropiles * Not included in 1997 UBC * Micropiles are 12-inch-diameter or less, bored, grouted-ine Place piles incorporating steel pipe (casing) andior stool reinforcement, * For SDC C, a permanent steel casing shall be provided from top of a micropile pile down to the point of zero curvature * For SDC D, E or F, the pile shall be considered an alternative system. Alternative pile system design, supporting documentation, and test data shall be Submitted to bulleing official per 104.11. = wy a at Chapter 19 — Concrete * 1997 UBC » ACI 318-95 with modifications * 2009 IBC » ACI 318-08 with modifications www.skghoshassociates.com8. K. Ghosh Associates Inc. So Chapter 19 —- Concrete + Major changes between ACI 318-99 and ACI 318-02 + Major changes also between ACI 318-05 and ACI 318-08 Chapter 19 - Concrete Portions of Chapters 2 through 7 of ACI 318 no longer reproduced: 4902 through 1907 reference sections within ACI 318 Chapters 2 through 7. A small number of amendments in these sections. | www. skghoshassociates,com8. K. Ghosh As: Chapter 19 ~ Concrete Remainder of ACI 318-08 adopted by reference, subject to amendments listed in 1908 Chapter 19 — Concrete * Other Provisions ~ 1909 ~ Structural Plain Concrete (Ch. 22, ACI 318-08) | ~ 1910 of 2003 IBC ~ Seismic Design Provisions | DELETED » 1910 ~ Minimum Slab Provisions » 1911 — Anchorage to Concrete ~ ASD » 1912 ~ Anchorage to Conorete — Strength Design (App. | D, ACI 318-08) » 1913 ~ Shoterete » 1914 ~ Reinforced Gypsum Concrete > 1915 — Concrete-Filled Pipe Columns www.skghoshassociates.com 143S. K. Ghosh Associates inc. | Technical Changes to ACI 318-02 Former App. 8 (Unified Design Procedure) Moved to Chapters 8, 9, 10 and 18 Former App. C (ASCE 7-98 Load Factors) Moved to Chapter 9 Former Sections of Chapters Affected by Above Moves are Now Placed in App. B & C, Where they May Continue to be Used Technical Changes to ACI 318-02 « Former App. A — Alternate Design Method (Working Stress Design) Deleted | » New App. A - Strut-and-Tie Models | ° New App. D - Anchoring to Concrete | wu.skghashassociates.comTechnical Changes to ACI 318-02 * Classification of P/S Concrete (18.3.3) d (U) » Transition (T) » Cracked (C) » Uneracke * Serviceability Requirements for P/S Concrete (Table R18.3.3) | * Elimination of Upper Tensile Stress Limit in PIS Concrete (18.4) Technical Changes to ACI 318-02 Addition of Provisions for Special and Intermediate Precast Structural Walls and Special Precast Moment Frames for Resisting Seismic Loads (21.6, 21.8, 21.13) www.skghoshassociates, cam 145S.K. Ghosh Associates Inc. | | ACI 318-08 | | Design requirements for earthquake-resistant structures have been rewritten in terms of | Seismic Design Categories (SDC). | Prior terminology of regions of low, moderate, and high seismic risk discontinued. Change makes ACI 318 terminology the same as that used in the IBC and ASCE 7. 8s i abies: Chapter 2: Notation and Definitions \ Definitions that used to be located at the beginning of Chapter 27 have been | transferred to Section 2.2. |8. K. Ghosh Associates Inc. Chapter 3: Materials New ASTM Standards: Steel Fibers for Fiber-Reinforced Concrete Deformed and Plain Stainless-Steel Bars Headed Steel Bars Deformed and Plain Stainless Stee! Wire and Welded Wire Reinforcement Deformed and Plain, Low-Carbon, Chromium, Steel bars Steel Stud Assemblies for Shear Reinforcement a Chapter 4: Durability Requirements Format of Chapter 4 is extensively revised by introducing exposure categories and classes, with applicable durability requirements given for the various classes in a unified format Restructuring does not invoive any significant changes to the provisions of 318-05. www.skghoshassociates.com 147,8. K, Ghosh Associates Inc. Chapter 5: Concrete Quality, Mixing, | and Placing 5.3.3.2(d) - ACI 318 has now recognized the use of three 4x8 in. cylinders as equivalent to the use of two 6x12 in. cylinders. This change is also refiected in Section 5.6.2.4. Chapter 7: Details of Reinforcement To permit a more consistent application of | tolerances in ACI 318 and other ACI | documents, “specified cover” has replaced | “minimum cover” through Chapter 7. This | change affects Sections 7.7.1, 7.7.2, 7.7.3, | 7.7.4, 7.7.6, and 7.7.8. 5 | (ee www. skghoshassociates.com 1488, K. Ghosh sociates Inc. | | Chapter 7: Details of Reinforcement 7.13 (Requirements for Structural Integrity) | - Changes have been made to the | anchorage and splice requirements for structural integrity reinforcement. | Continuous top and bottom structural | reinforcement is now required to pass |gytrousn the column core. ame Chapter 8: Analysis and Design — General Considerations R8.2.4 - Restraint of shrinkage and temperature effects can cause significant | internal forces and displacements. In cases of restraint, shrinkage and temperature reinforcement requirements may exceed flexural reinforcement ee, www.skghoshassociates.com 1498. K. Ghosh Associates Inc. a | Chapter 8: Analysis and Design -— General Considerations 8.6 - Added to bring about a consistent treatment of lightweight concrete throughout ACI 378. |e] Chapter 8: Analysis and Design — General Considerations 8.8 — Newly added section: Effective Stiffness to Determine Lateral Deflections www.skghoshassociates,com 158. K. Ghosh Associates Inc. 2009 IBC 1605.2.1 Strength Design or LRFD Load Combinations 4.4(D + F) (Equation 18-1] 1.2(D + F+T)+4.6(L + H)+ 0.8(L, oF $ oF R) fatlon 16-2) 4.20 +1.6(L, oF $ oF R) + (L oF 0.80) (Equation 16-3) | 42+ 1.04 f,L+ 0.8(L, oF 8 oF R) (Equation 18-4) A204 4.08 HL +48 (Equation 18-6) | 09D 1ew+ 16H (Equation 18-5) 0.90 + 1,08 + 4.04 (Equation 18-7) f, = 0.8 except in spectal elroumstances f, = 0.2 except In special situations Chapter 9: Strength and Serviceability Requirements R9.2.1(a) - Load factor modification of 9.2.1(a) is different from live load reduction based on loaded area typically allowed in general building code. + The live load reduction adjusts the nominal load, | Le | | * The smaller load factor reflects the reduced | probability of simultaneous occurrence of maximum values of multiple transient loads. + Both may be used at the same time. www.skghoshassociates.com 1518. K. Ghosh Associates Inc, ——_———_ Chapter 9: Strength and Serviceability Requirements 9.3.2.2 - Strength reductions factor, , for spirally reinforced columns has been increased from 0.70 to 0.75. | 9.3.5 - o-factor for plain concrete has been increased from 0.55 to 0.60. El a Chapter 10: | Flexure and Axial Loads Sections 10.10 through 10.13 of ACI 318-05 have been rewritten into the new Section | 10.10 on slenderness effects in compression members. a www.skghoshassociates.com 152Chapter 11: Shear and Torsion \ | 11.4.6.1 - Significant changes have been made to the list of members for which minimum shear reinforcement is not required when V,, exceeds 0.50V,. Chapter 11: Shear and Torsion 41.11.58 - The addition of code requirements | to permit the use of headed stud assemblies as shear reinforcement in slabs and footings is one of the most significant changes in Chapter 11. www. skghoshassociates. com 153S. K. Ghosh Associates Inc. | Chapter 41: Shear and Torsion | | Chapter 12: Development and Splices of Reinforcement li28 ~ New, development of headed and | | mechanically anchored deformed bars in | tension. The use of headed deformed bars | is attractive as an alternative to hooked bar anchorages in regions where reinforcement | is heavily congested. www.skghoshassociat 1548. K. Ghosh Associates : Development and Splices of Reinforcement Chapter 1 Chapter 14: Walls 14.3.7 — 318-05: In addition to the minimum reinforcement required by 14.3.1, not less than two No. 5 bars shall be provided around ail window and door openings. Such bars shall be extended to develop the bar beyond the corner of the openings but not less than 24 in. i =| www.skghoshassociates,com 1558. K, Ghosh Associates Inc, Chapter 14: Walls 44.3.7 - In addition to the minimum reinforcement required by 14.3.1, not less than two No. § bars in walls having two layers of reinforcement in both directions and one No. 5 bar in walls having a single layer of reinforcement in both directions shall be provided around window, door, and similar sized openings. Such bars shall be anchored to develop fy in tension at the corners of the openings. | iL Chapter 14: Walls » Slender wall design provisions of Section 14.8 modified. www.skghoshassociates.comChapter 15: Footings | | 15.10.4 — New. States unequivocally that the minimum reinforcing steel in nonprestressed mat foundations shall meet _ the requirements of 7.12.2 in each principal direction and that the maximum spacing shall not exceed 18 in. Chapter 15: Footings R15.10.4 - Supplies important clarification. It states: Minimum reinforcing steel may be distributed near the top or bottom of the section, or may be allocated between the two faces of the section as deemed appropriate for | specific conditions such that the total area of continuous reinforcing steel satisfies Section 7.12.2. » = bes = www.skghoshassociates,com 1878. K, Ghosh Associates Chapter 18: Prestressed Concrete 18.4.1 - Allowable concrete compressive stress immediately after prestress transfer at the ends of pretensioned simply supported members increased from 0.60f', to 0.70f;. | Change was made based on research results and common practice in the precast/prestressed concrete industry. | Chapter 18: Prestressed Concrete |18.12.6 — Except as permitted in 18.12.7, in slabs with unbonded tendons, a minimum of two 1/2-in. diameter or larger, seven wire, post-tensioned strands shall be provided in each direction at columns, either passing through or anchored within the region bounded by the longitudinal reinforcement = of the column. www.skghoshassociates.com 88. K. Ghosh Associates In Chapter 20: Strength Evaluation of | Existing Structures 20.3.2 - The test load intensity in 20.3.2 of 318-05, 0.85 (1.4D+#1.7L) has been revised to be not less than the largest value given by three different load combinations. 5 | Chapter 21: Earthquake-Resistant Structures The title has changed from “Special Provisions for Seismic Design” to “Earthquake Resistant Structures.” | www.skghoshassociates.com 159h Associates [ Chapter 21: Earthquake-Resistant | Structures In 318-08, seismic detailing requirements are presented in the order of ascending SDCs. | Chapter 21 starts with two new provisions for SDC B structures. The provisions for SDC C structures ( intermediate detailing) follow. Appearing last are the provisions for SDC D, E, and F structures (special detailing). This has resulted in Chapter 21 section numbers L__changing from 318-05 to 318-08, ee 2009 IBC Modifications to ACI 318- 08 * 1908.1.1 — Additional or modified definitions | » Design Displacement » Detailed plain conorete structural wall » Ordinary precast structural wall » Ordinary reinforced concrete structural wall | » Ordinary structural plain concrete wall Special structural wall » Wall Pier A www.skghoshassociates.com 1608, K, Ghosh Associates Inc. 2008 IBC Modifications to ACI 318-08 » 1908.1.2 — Modifies 21.1.1.3 and 21.2.1.7, scope sections of ACI 318 Chapter 21 | yy | 2009 IBC Modifications to ACI 318-08 ° 1908.1.3 — Intermediate and special precast concrete shear walls: steel elements that are allowed to yield. Ss fi www. skghoshassociates.com 1618. K. Ghosh Associates Ine, ee | _ 2009 IBC Modifications to ACI 318-08 * 1908.1.3 - Wall piers for SDC C. 2009 IBC Modifications to ACI 318-08 + 1908.1.4 - Wall piers, SDC D, E, F » Wall piers not designed as part of a special moment-resisting frame shall have transverse reinforcement in accordance with Sect, 21.9,10.2 (not in ACI 318) a wwnw.skghoshassociates.com 162S. K. Ghosh Associates Inc. 2009 IBC Modifications to ACI 318-08 | | + 1908.1.5 - Special precast structural walls must satisfy 21.4.4 (not in ACI 318) 2009 IBC Modifications to ACI 318-08 * 1908.1.6 — Foundations shall comply with 21.12... unless modified by IBC Chapter 18 / ASCE 7 Sect. 9.7 (ie www. slghoshassociates.com 183h Associates Inc. 2009 IBC Modifications to ACI 318-08 + 1908.1.7 — Detailed Plain Concrete Structural Walls — amends ACI 318 Section 22.6. 2009 IBC Modifications to ACI 318-08 * 1908.1.8 - Modifications to ACI 318 Section 22.10, Plain Concrete Foundations www.skghoshassociates,com 164§&. K. Ghosh Associates Inc. | 2009 IBC Modifications to ACI 318-08 + 1908.1.9 - Modifies ACI 318 Sections D.3.3.4and | 0.3.3.5 of Appendix D, Anchoring to Conerete. These sections require ductile faiture of anchors subject to earthquake forces in structures assigned to SDC C-F, unless there is yielding of attachment prior to attainment of design strength | of anchor or anchor Is over-strength. | 2009 IBC Modifications to ACI 318-08 * 1908.1.9 —- Exceptions to 0.3.3.4 and D.3.3.5: 41. Anchors in concrete designed to support nonstructural components in accordance with ASCE 7 Section 13.4.2 need not satisfy | D.3.3.4 or D.3.3.5. | www.skghoshassociates.com8. K. Ghosh Associates Inc, | 2009 IBC Modifications to ACI 318-08 | + 1908.1.9 - Exceptions to D.3.3.4 and D.3.3.5: |2. Walls designed to resist wall out-of-plane forces with design strengths equal to or greater than the force determined in accordance with ASCE 7 Equation 12.11-1 or 12.14-10 need not satisfy D.3.3.4 or D.3.3.5. a Ls & | 2009 BC Modifications to ACI 318-08 * 1908.1.10 ~ Replace D.4.2.2 with the | following: The concrete breakout strength requirements for anchors in tension shail be considered satisfied by the design procedure of D..2 provided Equation D-8 is not used for anchor embedments exceeding 25 inches. a www.skghoshassociates.com 166S. K, Ghosh Associates Inc. 2009 IBC Modifications to ACI 318-08 + 1908.1.40 - Replace D.4.2.2 with the following (Contd.}: The concrete > breakout strength requirements for anchors in shear with diameters not exceeding 2 inches shall be considered satisfied by the design | procedure of D.6.2. x = $$$, 2009 IBC Modifications to AC! 318-08 * 1908.1.10 - Replace D.4.2.2 with the following (Contd.): For anchors in shear with diameters exceeding 2 inches, shear anchor reinforcement shall be provided in accordance with the procedures of D.6.2.8. wun skghoshassociates.com 1878. K, Ghosh Associat: Masonry Standard 1997 UBC {2000 IBc 2003 IBC ACI 530-99 ACI 530-02 ACI530.1-99 | ACI 530.1-02 None 2006 IBC ae IBC | ACI530-05 | AGI 530-08, ACI 530.1-05 |ACI530.1-08 1997 UBC to 2008 MSJC * Empirical design — Different + Working stress design — UBC allowed half-stress method + Strength design — MSJC did not have provisions until 2002 | ~ Different * Prescriptive seismic provisions ~ Zones versus Seismic Design Categories a + Inspection requirements — Different www.skghoshassoclates,com 1688. K. Ghosh Associates Ino. 1997 UBC to 2008 MSJC Strength design provisions - Load combinations of ASCE 7 | Seismic design | - spe Prestressed masonry Autoclaved Aerated Concrete (AAC) Masonry a = Chapter 22 — Steel » Summary of standards referenced in | the 1997 UBC and 2009 IBC www.skghoshassgciates.com 4695. K. Ghosh Associates Inc. Steel Standards BC I 2009 IBC 1997 UI AISC LRFD 1993, AISC 380-08 AISC ASD 1989 AISC 360-08 AISC Solsmic 1982 | alse 241-08 AISILRFO 1984 AISI 8100-07 AISI ASD 1986 (with 1989 addendum) None | aise 360-08 Stee! Standards 200 186 "008 186 7008 186 AISC LRFD 1968 AIS LRFD 1909 AIsC 360.05, | Inch Supe. No 4, January 1088 Also As 1988 Also ASD 1980 Asc 28006 tool Suppl. No. 2004 raise 296) AISC Solsmie 1067 [IGG Selamle 2002 A186 | Also e408 tool Suppt No.4, 1089 [24 | | | | As 4996 AISUNASPEC 2001 | AISINAS 2001 Incl. 2004 supp A180 Hee wer 1180 468 000 aco www.skghoshassociates.com 1701 i ! ' 1 aise 361 } aise a6]! ! AIsc LRFD | taega)|t ee ae eal 1) RRO fe g| ERED for Stel ‘area | Sale Aneto cucings | Memoer| AIs¢ HSS. (2000) LRFD for Steet Hollow Sections 8. K, Ghosh Associates Inc. Chapter 22 - Steel Reference Standards Alsc 335 (1999) ASD and Plaatle eslgn be AIsc 360, (2008) | on of Chapter 22 - Steel Reference Standards AIsC 344 AISC 341 (2002) (2008) Selamle > | sesmic | Provisions for Provisions for Steel Steet Building Buildings www.skghoshassociates.com 1718. K, Ghosh Associates Ine. hh Revisions to AISC 341-05 Two New Structural Systems * Buckling Restrained Braced Frames (BRBF) | * Special Plate Shear Walls (SPSW) N Ls New Seismic Force-Resisting Systems Buckling Restrained Braced Frames www.skghoshassociates, cam8. K, Ghosh Ags nc. New Seismic Force-Resisting Systems Special Steel Plate Shear Walls Revisions to AISC 341-05 AISC 341-08 makes reference to a new AISC standard for the pre-qualification of seismic moment connections AISC 358 Prequalified Connections for Special and Intermediate Moment Frames in Seismic Applications : ‘www. skghoshassociates.com 1738. K, Ghosh Associates Ino. 1997 UBC Division Vili ~ Lateral Resistance for Stee! Stud Wall Systems * 2219 ~ General ~ Nominal shear values for shear walls framed with cold-formed steel! for both wind and selsmic forces + 2220 ~ Special Requirements in Seismic Zones 3 and 4 ~ Limitations ~ Detailing requirements 2006 IBC Section 2210: Cold-Formed Steel Light-Framed Construction 2009 IBC Section 2210.6 Lateral design — The design of light-framed cold-formed steel walls and diaphragms to resist wind and seismic loads shall be in accordance with AISI - Lateral. www.skghoshassociates.com 1748. K. Ghosh Associates Inc. 2006 IBC Section 2210: Cold-Formed Steel Light-Framed Construction Section 2210.7 Prescriptive framing (new in 2006 IBC) Detached one- and two-family dwellings and townhouses, up to two stories in height, shall be permitted to be constructed in accordance with AISI-PM, subject to the NN limitations therein. = Sees 2006 IBC Section 2210: Cold-Formed | Steel Light-Framed Construction AISI Lateral Standard for Cold-Formed Steel | Framing - Lateral Design, 2007 AISI Pill Standard for Cold-Formed Stoel Framing - Prescriptive Method for One and Two Family Dwellings, 2007 www. skghoshassaciates.com 1758. K. Ghosh Associates inc. tenn 7 ' | For more information... www.skghoshassociates.com | For information on codes, | standards and guidelines... www. iccsafe.org 001-708-799-2300 (International) NS 1-888-422-7233 (Within USA) Seismic Details for Reinforced Concrete Buildings in Moderate Seismic Applications 8. K. Ghosh Associates Inc. | Palatine, IL www.skghoshassoclates.com www.skghoshassociates.com 1768. K, Ghosh Associates Ine, | ACI 318-05 Chapter 21 | f Applicability of Requirements Flexural Members www.skghoshassociates.com 4778. K, Ghosh Associates Ine. | Beams of Intermediate Moment Frames - Longitudinal Reinforcement | fain = 3F/t, 2008, Tefen T ak — \ | SS MA 2M/3 Mr ,2 Ming 5 Mr, or M*,2 (max. M, at either joint)/5 (21.12.41) = Beams of intermediate Moment | Frames— Transverse Reinforcement | ars 8 xsmallest long. bar dla, 24x Hoop bar dia 32" a Hoops _ Strrupe , Moone, LAL trons: rant based on i, and factored tributary gravity lond (24.2.3, 21.42.4,2, 21.12.4,3) www.skghoshassociates.com 1788. K. Ghosh Associates Inc. Hoop Reinforcement fees 852319) nereon Detar jC ‘xfonson Consscuive wosetiee Baath Deane shel hava Go greg —a——w OY hooks on oppest sides a | 13.36) Lo revty ul | + If =Axy Aa ) srt Skdosway right Ge RE a= Aast| a Eg = www.skghoshassociates.com 179S. K. Ghosh Associates inc. Intermediate Moment Frames - Two-way Slabs 4 Al reinforcement necessary Column strip. arQ la +3h ils resist M tobe placed in | fof eneecesee L Vs Midate strip Ld Reinforcement in column strip/2 5 Note Apples o both tp and hottom ralaforcament | (21.32.68) = { Reinforcement necessary to resist yM, Banded Column Strip Reinforcement www.skghoshassociates.com 180S, K, Ghosh Associates ine. [CC Longitudinal Reinforcement in Column Strip of Slab Agi Centauous | Baye i Be | Lt co Deveop ty Lt | Longitudinal Reinforcement in Middle Strip of Slab www. skghoshassociates.com 181S.K, Ghosh Associates |nc. 21.12.6.8 - Shear Strength of Two- Way Slabs without Beams in Intermediate Moment Frames * Slab-column frames are | susceptible to punching-shear failures during earthquakes if the shear stresses due to gravity loads are high 21.12.6.8 — Shear Strength of Two- | Way Slabs without Beams in intermediate Moment Frames * At the critical sections for columns | defined in 11.12.1.2, two-way shear caused by factored gravity loads shall not exceed 0.46V,, where V, shall be calculated as defined in 11.12.2.1 for nonprestressed slabs and 11.12.2.2 for prestressed slabs www.skghoshassociates.com 182S.K. Ghosh Associates inc, 21.12.6.8 - Shear Strength of Two- | Way Slabs without Beams in | intermediate Moment Frames * It shall be permitted to waive this requirements if the contribution of the earthquake-induced factored two-way shear stress transferred by eccentricity of shear in accordance with 11.12.64 and 11.12.6.2 at the N Point of maximum stress does not exceed one-half of the stress OV, | Members Subjected to Bending and Axial Load www. skghoshassociatas.com 1838. K. Ghosh Associates Ine. Ie | | Columns of Intermediate Moment Frames— Transverse Reinforcement \ATT, Hoops | Joint reinf. ae per d1.d4.2 Lit | | { je! x smllast ong. bar da, 4 ced Ban hoon bar i Ts oexmin (hort) | | 2 | [Larger of hy or ha] —_ fy 2! per ‘to conform to 7.40 and 11.5.4.4, Ss 4 ae 3, 24.125) gz For more information... www.skghoshassociates.com | For information on codes, standards and guidelines... www. icesafe.org | 001-708-799-2300 (international) 1-888-422-7233 (Within USA) www.skghoshassociates.com 14

Ibc-Seismic Design Provision - 2009 by DR SK Gosh

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Ibc-Seismic Design Provision - 2009 by DR SK Gosh

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

You might also like