Chapter 2
Grammatical Structures of the Ten Common Thaats of North
Indian Classical Music: A Mathematical Approach
“We can no more come to understand mathematics by examining its final product than
we can understand the experience of music through simply looking at a score or an
analysis of one; there is an experience that lies underneath and behind the systematic
organization of the material”- Edward Rothstein
2.1 Introduction:
In Indian music, two systems of scales are found to be prevalent, South Indian or
Carnatic music and North Indian or Hindustani classical music. The South Indian
classical music consists of 72 scales whereas the North Indian classical music is based
on 32 scales called thaats. A scale is defined as a series of notes, arranged by order of
pitch, between a root and the octave. Theoretically, any combination of notes between
the root and octave could be considered a scale. A musical note is again a type of
notation which is used to represent the pitch and duration corresponding to a musical
sound. An octave refers to a range of notes, with the highest one being two times in
frequency compared to the first. Traditionally music is thought to be made of seven
basic notes both in Indian and western music. These are denoted as S, R, G, m, P, D and
N. The eighth note would be double in frequency to the first note. Now out of these
seven notes the notes (S) and (P) are immovable and are called Achala Swar. These two
notes form the tonal foundation for all the Indian classical music. The remaining five
notes viz. R, G, M, P, D, N on the other hand can be modified in pitch. They have
alternate forms and are called Chala Swar. Out of the five alternate forms four are
42
komal or flat viz. (r, g, d, n) and one sharp or teevra viz. (M). Thus the full twelve tone
scale is represented as S, r, R, g, G, m, M, P, d, D, n and N. Just a note and its overtones
can’t be used to create music. The series of notes are to be used in such a manner that
they differ in pitch, as well as create a pleasant experience. A raga which is a
fundamental feature of Hindustani classical music is derived from a parent heptatonic
scale known as thaats. Although theoretically thirty-two thaats are considered possible,
most modern musicians today follow the raga classification scheme under ten scales or
thaats as suggested by the Indian musicologist Pt Vishnu Narayan Bhatkhande.
Bhatkhande’s theory of ten thaats is still regarded as an important classificatory device
for ordering or grouping a huge array of ragas. The aim of this chapter is to study the
grammatical structure of the ten thaats suggested by Pandit Vishnu Narayan
Bhatkhande. The concept of ordered structure function, level of association among notes
are then utilized for illustrating the process of construction of the ten thaats that are
unique in nature. The graph theoretic approach has also been considered for presentation
of the ten thaats. This chapter is thus organised as follows. Section 2.2 discusses thaats
and its characteristics. A brief review of literature on this chapter is included in Section
1.4 of chapter 1. The Section 2.3 of this chapter presents the notes corresponding to the
different thaats in a matrix form. Section 2.4 deals with the behavior of the notes in
thaats. Section 2.5 explains the behavior of the pair of thaats with respect to the notes.
Section 2.6 discusses in detail the process of identifying a thaat using ordered structure
functions. In Section 2.7 thaats are numerically presented in terms of decimal
numbers.Section 2.8 deals with the diagrammatic presentation of thaats with respect to
the notes. In Section 2.9 thaats are presented as directed graphs. A discussion on the
results obtained is then presented at the end of the chapter.
43
2.2 Ten Thaats and their common characteristics:
According to Pandit Vishnu Narayan Bhatkhande, a thaat must fulfill the following
conditions:
1) A thaat must consist of seven consecutive notes out of all the 12 notes. Again both
the pure and modified forms of a note cannot be used in a thaat.
2) A thaat has only ascending order and no descending order.
3) A thaat does not have any emotional or aesthetic value.
4) In every thaat there is one raga that usually has the name of the thaat and others,
which are derived from that thaat, by dropping one or more notes from the parent
scales.
In short, it can be said that of all possible musical scales only heptatonic scales
satisfying the above conditions can be considered as a thaat. The ten thaats according to
Bhatkhande(1993) are presented below.
Table 2.1: The ten thaats along with their note combinations
Name of the Flat(Komal)or
Note Combination
Thaat Sharp(Teevra) Notes
Bilawal S , R ,G , m , P , D , N All Pure notes
Khamaj S , R ,G , m , P , D , n N Flat
Kalyan S , R ,G , M , P , D , N m Sharp
Bhairav S,r ,G,m,P, d,N R , D Flat
Kafi S,R,g,m,P,D,n G , N Flat
Marwa S,r,G,M,P,D,N R Flat , m Sharp
44
Asawari S,R,g,m,P,d,n G , D, N Flat
Poorvi S,r,G,M,P,d,N m Sharp , R , D Flat
Todi S,r,g,M,P,d,N m Sharp , R , G , D
Flat
Bhairavi S,r,g,m,P,d,n R , G , D , N Flat
2.3 Thaat presentation in matrix form:
As mentioned earlier these ten thaats are certain heptatonic scales characterized by the
arrangement of the notes in a sequential order. Therefore the theory of matrices can play
a significant role in summarizing the presentation of these thaats in a concise form.
Let apj = 1, if jth note is present in the pth thaat
= 0, otherwise
for all p =Bilawal(Bil),Khamaj(Kha),Kafi(Kaf),Asawari(Asa),Bhairav(Bhai),
Bhairavi(Bha),Kalyan(Kal),Marwa(Mar),Poorvi(Poo) and Todi(Tod).
and j = S, r, R, g, G, … , n, N.
Relabeling p and j as p = i, ii, iii, …, x and j = 1, 2, 3, …, 12 the ten thaats are presented
below.
45
Thaat –note matrix
It is verified that Rank A = 6, which indicates that there are six independent thaats in the
group of ten thaats and others are dependent on them. The rank of the above matrix is
computed using online matrix calculator.
2.4 Behavior of the notes in the Thaats:
The ten thaats are constructed from twelve notes combined in a group of seven notes
using some well defined rules as mentioned in Section 2.2. These rules are used for
construction of the thaats. Since these ten thaats are based on twelve notes, thaats are
overlapping with respect to the notes. The presence of common notes in thaats makes
them similar to some extent.
The notes S(1) and P(8) are present in all the 10 thaats.
The notes used in all the thaats in order of their frequency are (1,8), (6,12),
(2,3,4,5,9,10) and (7,11) and their corresponding frequencies are 10, 6 , 5, 4 and 3. The
use of komal (flat), teevra (sharp) notes and corresponding shuddha (pure) notes in all
46
the thaats reveals an interesting property viz. r:R = 5:5, g:G =4:6, m:M = 6:4, d:D = 5:5,
n:N = 4:6. The reason behind adopting m:M = 6:4 and n:N = 4:6 is that notes M and n
are not allowed to appear at the same in a Thaat.
2.5 Behavior of the pair of Thaats with respect to the notes:
Since there are 10 thaats in total we obtain10C2 = 45 pairs of thaats which may be
compared with respect to the notes present.
Level of Association: The level of association is defined by the number of elements
present in intersection of thaats.
From the thaat –note matrix it is clear that intersection of all thaats is represented by the
set {1,8}.
Let Tp j(k) be the intersection of thaat p and j with size k where p, j = i, ii, iii, iv, … ,x and
k = 2, 3, 4, 5, 6.
Let Tp j(k) = (npj(k1), npj(k2), npj(k3) ,…, npj(kk)), where npj(kl) is the lth note in the intersection
of (p, j)th pair of thaat, for kth level of association of notes with npj(k1)< npj(km) for l<m
and npj = 1,2,3,… ,12. The last note npj(kk) represents the kth position of a note in the
intersection of (p,j)th pair of thaats for ‘k’ level association between notes. The pair of
thaats Tpj(k) are shown in the following table
47
Table2.2: Intersection of pairs of thaats
LEVEL OF ASSOCIATION
I
N 6 5 4 3 2
{1,3,5,6,8,10}=Ti {1,3,6,8,10}= Ti {1,3,6,8}=Ti {1,6,8}=Ti {1,8}=T ii
(6) (5) (4) (3) (2)
T ii iii iv vi x
{1,3,5,8,10,12}=Ti {1,5,6,8,12}=Ti {1,5,8,12}=Ti {1,8,12}=Ti {1,8}=T iii
(6) (5) (4) (3) (2)
E vii v ix x ix
{1,5,8,10,12}=T
{1,3,6,8,10,11}=T {1,5 ,6 ,8 }=T {1,5,8}=T ii {1,8}=T iv
(6) i (4) (3) (2)
ii iii (5) ii v ix viii
R viii
{1,3,4,6,8,11}=T {1,3,6,8,11}=T {1,6,8,11}=Tii {1,6,8}=Tiii {1,8}=T
(6) (5) (4) (3) (2)
S iii iv ii iv vi v vi vii
{1,4,6,8,9,11}=T iv {1,3,5,8,10}=T {1,5,8,10}=T ii {1,8,10}=T iii
(6) (5) (4) (3)
E vi ii vii viii viii
{1,2,5 ,8,9,12}= T {1,4,6,8,11}=T {1,3,8,10}=T {1,4,8}=T iii
(6) (5) (4) (3)
C v ix iii vi iii vii x
{1,5,7,8,10,12}= T {1,2 ,6,8,9}= T v {1,6,8,9}=Tiv {1,3,8}=T iv
(6) (5) (4) (3)
T vii viii vi v vii
{1,2,5,7,8,12}=T {1,2,5 ,8,12 }= {1,4,8,9}=T iv {1,8,9}=T iv
(6) (5) (4) (3)
I viii ix T v viii x ix
{1,2,7,8,9,12}=T {1,2, 8,9,12}= T {1,5 ,8,12 }=T {1,2,8}=T vi
(6) (5) (4) (3)
O ix x vx v vii viii
{1,2,4 ,8 ,9 }=T {1,2,8,9 }=T vi
(5) (4)
N vi x ix
{1,5,7,8,12}=T {1,7,8,12}=
(5) (4)
S vii ix Tvii x
{1,2,7,8,12}=T
(5)
viii x
48
Observations:
1 The presence of the notes 1 and 8 [i.e. S(1) and P(8)] in the intersection of a
particular pair indicates the minimum lowest level of association between the
pair of Thaats. Similarly {(1,2,8), (1,3,8), (1,4,8), (1,5,8), (1,6,8), (1,8,9),
(1,8,10), (1,8,12)} indicates the minimum three level association between the
thaats .
2 Higher level of association does not imply lower level of association between the
same pairs.
3 Inclusion or exclusion of a particular note in an intersection set sometimes
changes both the constituents of the pair.
4 Higher the level of association greater is the problem of identification of thaats.
While forming an association of notes of any level the pair of thaats already makes their
presence visible in the association. The constituents of a pair of thaat automatically
changes with the corresponding change in the level of association.
The pair of thaats with respect to maximum level of association may be presented by a
two way table as follows:
49
Table 2.3: Pair of thaats corresponding to level of association
Bil Kha Kaf Asa Bhai Bha Kal Mar Poo Tod
(i) (ii) (iii) (iv) (v) (vi) (vii) (viii) (ix) (x)
Bil (i) 6 5 4 5 3 6 5 4 3
Kha (ii) 6 5 4 4 5 4 3 2
Kaf (iii) 6 3 5 4 3 2 3
Asa (iv) 4 6 3 2 3 4
Bhai (v) 5 4 5 6 5
Bha (vi) 2 3 4 5
Kal (viii) 6 5 4
Ma r(ix) 6 5
Poo (x) 6
From Table 2.3 it is clear that the total number of six-level associations, five-level
associations, four-level associations, three-level associations and two-level associations
are 9, 12, 11, 9 and 4 respectively.
Observations:
(i) Because of the well defined rule for inclusion of notes in a particular thaat if Tpj(k) =
(np j(k1), npj(k2), npj(k3), … npj(kk)) and Tsj(k) = (nsj(k1), nsj(k2), nsj(k3), … nsj(kk)) are identical,
it implies that Tps(k) is not identical with either of Tpj(k) and Tsj(k) even if Tpj(k) = Tsj(k)
(Table 2.2)
(ii) It may be easily shown that Ti iii (5) = Ti ii iii (5), Tii iv (5) = Tii iii iv (5), Ti viii (5) = Ti vii viii (5),
50
(5)
T iv vi = Tiii iv vi (5), Tvii ix(5) = Tvii viii ix (5 ) , Tviii x
(5)
= Tviii ix x (5)
where Tp j s(k)
represents a set of k elements common to thaats p, j and s. For p, j, s = i, ii, iii, … ,
x and k = 3,4,5.
2.6 Process of construction of Thaat using ordered structure function:
The process of construction of thaats using level of association of notes starts with three
level and ends with six-level of association. The following example makes it clear.
Since notes (1,8) are present in all the thaats, rest of ten notes viz. 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 10,
11 and 12 may be introduced one by one till a six-level association of notes is found.
One more note included from rest of the six notes identifies the thaat. The 10 notes
combined in a group of two notes construct five parallel structures with corresponding
state vectors (2,3), (4,5), (6,7), (9,10) and (11,12).
2.6.1 Structure function of the notes in the level of association:
Let xi be the ith note in the group of 12 notes such that xi=i for i=1,2,...,12.
These xi‘s assumes value 1 or 0 with respect to their presence or absence in a particular
thaat. The third level association between notes may now be defined as a 4 unit
structure function as follows:
Define S(x) =1 if a particular structure is valid
=0 otherwise.
where X = (x i) is a vector with four elements.
To obtain the corresponding structure function of third level we consider the following
51
five two unit parallel system of notes viz.
(i) x2 & x3
(ii) x 4 & x5
(iii)x6 & x7
(iv) x9 & x10
(v) x11 & x12.
The units x1 & x8 are then connected in series to any of these system in such a way that
the character x 1 < x2<…< x12 is maintained in determining the position of notes in the
association.
52
Fig 2.1: Three unit structures.
The five parallel systems defined above along with units x1 & x8 in series results S(x)=1
with state vectors
(i) (x1 x2 x3 x8) => either (1,1,0,1) or (1,0,1,1)
53
(ii) (x1 x4 x5 x8) => either (1,0,1,1) or (1,1,01)
(iii) (x1 x6 x7 x8) => only (1,1,0,1)
54
(iv)(x1 x8 x9 x10) => either (1,1,0,1) or (1,1,1,0)
(v) (x1 x8 x11 x12)=>.only (1,1,0,1)
55
From each of the above five two unit parallel systems we could have obtained a
maximum of ten three unit structures occurring in five pairs as shown in (i), (ii), (iii),
(iv) and (v). However the association of notes defined in (iii) and (v) shows the sole
occurrence of (x1 x6 x8) and (x1 x8 x12) respectively. This is mainly because of the
properties m:M=6:4 and n:N=4:6 as observed in Section 1. These two combinations
appear twice in the set of third level association.
These third level associations appear now as series systems which are connected to
two unit parallel structures defined above constructing 4-out-of-5 structure function.
The structure function S(x)=1 may now be redefined as a state vector with 5 elements as
follows:
(i) (x1 x2 x8 x9 x10) => only (1,1,1,1,0) = {1,2,8,9 } = T vi ix(4)
(ii) (x1 x2 x3 x6 x8) => only (1,0,1,1,1) = {1,3,6,8} = Ti iv(4)
(iii) (x1 x2 x3 x8 x10) => only (1,0,1,1,1) = {1,3,8,10} = T iii vii(4)
(iv) (x1 x4 x5 x8 x9) => only (1,1,0,1,1) = {1,4,8,9} = T iv x(4)
(vi) (x1, x5, x6, x7, x8) => only (1,1,1,0,1) = {1,5 ,6 ,8 } = T ii v(4)
(vii) (x1 x5 x8 x9 x10) => only (1,1,1,0,1) = {1,5,8,10} = T ii viii(4)
(viii) (x1 x4 x5 x8 x12) => only (1,0,1,1,1) = {1,5 ,8,12 } = T v vii(4)
(ix) (x1 x6 x7 x8 x9) => only (1,1,0,1,1) = {1,6,8,9} = Tivv(4)
(x) (x1 x6 x8 x11 x12) => only (1,1,1,1,0 = {1,6,8,11} = Tiivi(4)
(xi) (x1 x6 x7 x8 x12) => only (1,0,1,1,1) = {1,7,8,12} = Tvii x(4)
As an illustration the diagrammatic representations of two of the above structures are
demonstrated below viz. structures (i) and (ix).
56
Fig 2.2: Four unit structures
These four level associations viz. [(i), ii),(iii), …, (xi)] now behave as series structures
connected to two unit parallel structures defined above, forming 5-out-of-6 system of
notes. Hence for the 5th level association of notes the structure function S(x)=1 may now
be redefined as state vectors with 6 elements as follows:
57
(i) (x1 x2 x3 x4 x8 x9) =>only (1,1,0,1,1,1) ={1,2,4 ,8 ,9 }=T vi x(5)
(ii) (x1 x2 x3 x5 x8 x12) =>only (1,1,0,1,1,1) = {1,2,5 ,8,12 }= T v viii(5)
(iii) (x1 x2 x6 x7 x8 x9) =>only (1,1,1,0,1,1) ={1,2 ,6,8,9}= T v vi(5)
(iv) (x1 x2 x3 x7 x8 x12 ) =>only (1,1,0,1,1,1) ={1,2,7,8,12}=T viii x(5
(v) (x1 x2 x3 x5 x8 x10) =>only (1,0,1,1,1,1) ={1,3,5,8,10}=T ii vii(5)
(vi) (x1 x3 x6 x7 x8 x10 ) =>only (1,1,1,0,1,1) = {1,3,6,8,10}= Ti iii(5)
(vii) (x1 x3 x6 x8 x11 x12) =>only (1,1,1,1,1,0) = {1,3,6,8,11}=T ii iv(5)
(viii) (x1 x4 x5 x6 x8 x11) => only(1,1,0 ,1,1,1) = {1,4,6,8,11}=T iii vi(5)
(ix) (x1 x5 x6 x7 x8 x12 ) =>only (1,1,1 ,0,1,1) ={1,5,6,8,12}=Ti v(5)
(x) (x1 x5 x6 x7 x8 x12 ) => only (1,1,0,1,1,1) = {1,5,7,8,12} = T vii ix(5)
(xi) (x1 x5 x8 x9 x10 x12 ) =>only (1,1,1,0,1,1) ={1,5,8,10,12}=Tiviii(5)
The diagrammatic representations of two of the above structures are illustrated below.
viz. (viii) and (vi).
58
Fig 2.3: Five unit structures
These five level associations viz. [(i) (x1 x2 x3 x4 x8 x9) ,(ii) (x1 x2 x3 x5 x8 x12) ,
(iii) (x1 x2 x6 x7 x8 x9) ,(iv) (x1 x2 x3 x7 x8 x12 ) ,(v) (x1 x2 x3 x5 x8 x10)
(vi)(x1 x3 x6 x7 x8 x10 ) ,(vii) (x1 x3 x6 x8 x11 x12) ,(viii) (x1 x4 x5 x6 x8 x11)
(ix) (x1 x5 x6 x7 x8 x12 ) ,(x) (x1 x5 x6 x7 x8 x12 ) (xi) (x1 x5 x8 x9 x10 x12 ) ]
now behave as series structures connected to two unit parallel structures defined above,
forming 6-out-of-7 system of notes. Hence for the 6th level association of notes the
structure function S(x)=1 may now be redefined as state vectors with 7 elements as
follows:
59
(i) (x1 x2 x4 x5 x7 x8 x12) => only (1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1) = {1,2,5,7,8,12} = T viii ix(6)
(ii) (x1 x2 x5 x8 x9 x10 x12) => only (1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1) = {1,2,5 ,8,9,12} = T v ix(6)
(iii) (x1 x2 x7 x8 x9 x10 x12) => only (1,1,1 ,1,1,0 ,1) = {1,2,7,8,9,12} = T ix x(6)
(iv) (x1 x2 x3 x4 x6 x8 x11) => only(1,0,1,1,1,1,1) = {1,3,4,6,8,11} = T iii iv(6)
(v) (x1 x3 x4 x5 x6 x8 x10) => only (1,1,0,1,1,1,1) = {1,3,5,6,8,10} = Ti ii(6)
(vi) (x1 x3 x5 x8 x10 x11 x12) => only (1,1,1,1,1,0,1) = {1,3,5,8,10,12} = Ti vii(6)
(vii) (x1 x3 x6 x8 x10 x11 x12 ) => only (1,1,1,1,1,1,0) = {1,3,6,8,10,11} = T ii iii(6)
(viii) (x1 x4 x6 x8 x9 x10 x11) => only (1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1) = {1,4,6,8,9,11} = T iv vi(6)
(ix) (x1 x5 x7 x8 x9 x10 x12 ) => only (1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1) = {1,5,7,8,10,12} = T vii viii(6)
Two of the above structures are shown below viz. (iv) and (v).
Fig 2.4: Six unit structures
60
These six level associations viz.[ (i) (x1 x2 x4 x5 x7 x8 x12) , (ii) (x1 x2 x5 x8 x9 x10
x12) , (iii) (x1 x2 x7 x8 x9 x10 x12) , (iv) (x1 x2 x3 x4 x6 x8 x11)
(v) (x1 x3 x4 x5 x6 x8 x10) , (vi) (x1 x3 x5 x8 x10 x11 x12) ,
(vii) (x1 x3 x6 x8 x10 x11 x12 ) , (viii) (x1 x4 x6 x8 x9 x10 x11),
(ix) (x1 x5 x7 x8 x9 x10 x12 ) ]
now behave as series structures connected to two unit parallel structures defined above,
forming 6-out-of-7 system of notes.
Remark:
From above it can be observed that while preparing the 6 level associations, four two
unit parallel structures are used along with the notes 1 and 8. The remaining two unit
parallel structure would finally be included in the six level associations for construction
of a particular thaat.
Process of construction of thaat described in Section 2.6 incorporates the rules of
inclusion and exclusion of notes in a pair of thaats and this has been shown by
considering an example for constructing the Kalyan thaat.
61
Table 2.4: Example showing construction of a thaat
Initial pair note note result pair of Last The
(1,8) included excluded thaats note thaat
identified included
5 4 1,5,8 T29(3)
10 9 1,5,8,10 T28(4
12 11 1,5,8, 10,12 T18(5)
3 2 1,3,5,8,10,12 T17(6)
7 1,3,5,7,8,10,12 7 Kalyan(7)
From above discussion it may be seen that all the ten thaats together can be defined as
1-out-of-10 –G system with
φ(x)=max αj(x) for j=1,2,....,10
where αj(x) is a series structure function of jth minimal path set. φ(x) is an arbitrary
system of parallel arrangement of ten series systems which are thaats. The following
proposition is a justification of Bhatkhande's ten thaat theory.
2.6.2: Proposition:
N structures each of type 1-out-of -k:G parallel structure can generate a minimum
number of Nk non identical series structures.
Proof:
Define xij to be jth unit of ith 1-out of -k:G parallel structure such that
62
x ij = 1 if jth unit of ith structure is active
=0 otherwise .
for j=1,2,...k and i=1,2,..., N.
Let Bi (x) be a structure function with state vector x=(xi1 , x i2 , x i3 ,… ,.x ik ) such
that
Bi (x) = 1 if one and only one member of x is 1 and others are zero.
=0 otherwise.
i.e Bi (x) is the ith 1-out of -k:G parallel structure .
Hence we may define β1 as a row matrix with Nk elements consisting of 1 and 0 only
such that
β1 (x) = (B11 (x), B21 (x) ,…, BN1 (x))
where Bi1(x) contains one “1” and k-1 “0” for i=1,2,....,N in the first row of the ith 1-out
of -k:G parallel structure Bi.Thus Bi1(x) is a row matrix with k elements.Hence Bi1(x)
may assume any one of the k following forms.viz. 1:(1,0,0…,0), 2:(0,1,0…,0)
3:(0,0,1,0,…,0),…,k:(0,0,0…,k).Therefore the minimum number of non identical rows
obtained by inserting “1” once and only once in each Bi(x) is Nk. Thus we have a matrix
β(x) = (β1(x) ,β2(x),.........,βNk(x) )/
i.e. N structures each of type 1-out-of-k:G parallel structure can generate minimum
number of Nk non identical series structures.
Result: The consequence of the above proposition may be stated as that five two unit
parallel structures of notes can produce a minimum number of ten non-identical thaats.
63
Since the notes 1 and 8 are fixed in all the thaats the mt h βm(x) may be rewritten as
βm(x)= ( Im , B1m(x) ,B2m(x), B3m(x) , I m , B4m(x) , B5m(x) ). For m=1,2,...........10
where Bim is a ith structure present in m th
thaat for i=1,2,3,4,5.Each row βm
contains 12 (2+10) elements.
…........................................(*)
Hence β(x)=(β1(x) , β2(x),… ,βNk(x) )/ is a matrix of order 10x12 giving a total
of 120 elements in total.
β(x)=(β1(x) ,β2(x),.........,β10(x) )/ may be seen as a 1-out-of-10:G parallel system
with βm(x)= ( Im B1m(x) , B2m(x) , B3m(x) , I m , B4m(x) , B5m(x) ).
β(x) may be presented in terms of minimal path set such that
β(x) = max( βm(x) ) with minimal path set
( Im B1m(x) , B2m(x) , B3m(x) , Im , B4m(x) , B5m(x) ).
That is βm(x) is a series structure function with minimal path set defined above. This
minimal path set consists of seven active members which ensure that thaat contains
seven notes each.
2.6.3: Uniqueness of ten thaats:
By general rule of inclusion and exclusion of notes in the ten thaats from five two unit
parallel systems it should have been r:R =g:G=m:M=d:D=n:N=5:5. But it is observed
g:G=4:6, m:M=6:4 and n:N=4:6. This happens because Bhatkhande selected those ten
linear scales that can be converted to circular scales with seven notes .i.e. scales
corresponding to famous ten ragas which include almost all the common ragas of North
Indian classical raga system. Out of the ten scales, Bilawal and Bhairav are unique in
64
the sense that Bilawal contains all the pure notes whereas Bhairav contains all the flat
notes except G and N. The rest of the remaining 8 scales are divided into two classes in
such a way that one set viz.{Kalyan,Marwa,Poorvi,Todi} contains M and the other set
viz. {Khamaj,Kafi,Asawari,Bhairavi} contains m. This justifies the ratio m:M=6:4 and
n:N=4:6 and also the uniqueness of the ten heptatonic scales. All the ten thaats
discussed above are structured with the help of binary numbers according to the
positions occupied by the twelve notes(S,r,R,g,G,m,M,P,d,D,n,N).These ten binary
numbers are then converted to their equivalent decimal numbers for the unique
identification of the ten thaats.
2.7 Presentation of thaats in terms of Binary numeral system (BNS):
The thaats may also be represented in terms of Binary numeral system as shown in the
figure below. The note combinations corresponding to each thaat are represented in bits
i.e. in a sequence of 0's and 1's .This binary sequence is then converted into its
corresponding decimal value.
For Example, The note combination for Bilawal thaat(1) is :S R G m P D N and as such
the binary sequence is given by 101011010101. Hence its decimal number is 2773. The
decimal numbers corresponding to all the thaats are obtained in a similar manner and
are shown below.
Table 2.5: Numerical representation of thaats in terms of decimal number.
Thaats i ii iii iv v vi vii viii Ix x
2773 2774 2902 2906 3418 3417 2741 3253 3257 3285
BNS
65
From the above table it is observed that the decimal number corresponding to thaat
Bhairav(v) is maximum whereas that of Kalyan thaat(7) is minimum.
2.8 Diagrammatic presentation of Thaats with respect to notes:
Since intersections of thaats are non-null they are not mutually independent. The union
of all the ten thaats can be presented in a five petal floral design as shown below. The
individual thaats and their constituent notes are then shown separately as a sub diagram
of the five petal floral design
Fig 2.5: Diagrammatic representation of the ten thaats in terms of five petal floral
designs.
Five petal floral design
66
Kalyan
Bhairavi
67
Asawari
Marwa
68
Poorvi
Kaf
69
Khamaj
Todi
70
Bhairav
Bilawa
71
Note: The floral designs presented above are helpful in visualizing the uniqueness of
each of the ten thaats.
2.9 Presentation of Thaats as directed graph:
Since thaats has only ascending order, each of the ten thaats can thus be treated as
connected acyclic digraphs or directed trees. The notes present in each of the thaats are
assumed to be nodes or vertices. Hence there are 10 trees, starting at a common node (S)
and meeting at a common node (P) as shown in the figure below.
Fig 2.6: Digraph D corresponding to the system of ten thaats
The above representation demonstrates the application of graph theory in visualizing the
pattern of occurrence of notes in the system of ten thaats. The above digraph D may be
described by the triplet {V(D), A (D), ψ(D)} where V(D) = {1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10,
11, 12} is a non-empty set of nodes or vertices, A(D) = { e12, e13, e24, e25, e34, e35, e46,
e47, e56, e57, e68, e78, e89, e810, e9 11, e9 12, e10 11, e10 12} is a set of arcs which is disjoint
from V(D) and ψ(D) = {(1,2), (1,3), (2,4), (2,5), (3,4), (3,5), (4,6), (4,7), (5,6), (5,7),
(6,8), (7,8), (8,9), (8,10), (9,11), (9,12), (10,11), (10,12)} is the incidence function. The
digraph D seems to be complicated in nature. There are 6 arcs per directed tree giving a
72
total of 6x10 = 60 arcs for the system of ten thaats.
Since it is difficult to identify each of the ten thaats from the above digraph, as well as
the connection between the notes in each thaat, we propose a simpler representation of
the above digraph in the figure below. The figure resembles the the birth chart of an
individual having twelve compartments, where each thaat is represented by a unique
colour.
Fig 2.7: An alternate representation of Digraph D
73
Discussion:
All the ten thaats are based on twelve notes as such overlapping of notes is unavoidable.
Thus in most of the cases thaats look similar. However the ten thaats constructed out of
five parallel systems viz. (x2 x3 ) , (x 4 x5 ) , (x6 x7) , (x9 x10) and (x11 x12) and a series
system (x1 x8) with inclusion ratio (5:5), (4:6), (6:4), (5:5), (4:6) and (10:10)
respectively are unique in nature.
Therefore a thaat may be defined as a series structure of seven notes constructed out of
twelve ordered notes where notes form five ordered parallel systems viz. (x2 x3),
(x 4 x5), (x6 x7 ), (x9 x10) and (x11 x12) and a series system (x1 x8) within themselves
.with notes M and n (x6 x11 ) not appearing at the same time. This actually justifies the
construction of exactly ten thaats from original thirty-two thaats by Pandit Vishnu
Narayan Bhatkhande.
In this chapter three kinds of approaches have been adopted for representing the
unique features of the ten common thaats of North Indian classical music viz.
1) Numerical representation of thaats in terms of binary and decimal number.
2) Diagrammatic representation of the ten thaats in terms of five petal floral
designs.
3) Presentation of thaats as directed graphs.
The numerical representation of thaats in terms of binary and decimal numbers provide
a quantitative measure for identification of thaats.Again Shetty and Achary (2009), has
shown that some raga characteristics viz. Arohan-avarohan can also be similarly
74
expressed in terms of binary and decimal number.This method can then be used for
identification of ragas as well as thaats.The various five petal floral designs shown in
Section 2.8 can serve as an important tool for non-musicians to visualise as well as to
understand the structure of the ten thaats.However the graph theoretic approach is a
much better tool to understand the theory of the ten thaats.Further graph theory has
been extensively applied in the in the subsequent chapters of the thesis for
understanding and analyzing raga grammar.
In the next chapter ragas have also been similarly defined in terms of structure function
of notes. Some non-parametric tests are then conducted for testing some musical
propositions concerning raga and its characteristics.
75