Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 8 July 10

    Uploaded by

    Khan Tunio
    6 views11 pages
    Shahrukh

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Shahrukh

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    6 views11 pages

    8 July 10

    Uploaded by

    Khan Tunio
    Shahrukh

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 11
    TRANSPARENCY 5, on ar ry tg Alert Kae INTERNATIONAL-PAKISTAN ag ac sey amaaaall Website: www:tansparencrora.ok 8 July 2010 ‘Muhammad Shahbaz Sharif, Chief Minister, Chief Ministers Secretariat, 7.Club Road, GOR, Lahore Sub: Mis-Procurement under Punjab Procurement Rules, 2009 by Exec ive Director aera nay Punjab Government Services Housing Foundation Mr. Aftab Islam Agha, Respected Sir, “Transparency Intemational, Pakistan is reporting the fist mis-procurement Coe in Punjab under the, Punjab. Procurement Rules, 2009 by Awarding a Consullaney Contract, inspire of this paricular procurement was declared as mis-prosurement by MD PPRA, vide his letters dated 22 aan ep1O, and 29 Tune 2010, by Executive Director (Engineering) Punjab Government Services Housing Foundation Mr. Aftab Islam Agha ‘A complaint receved from M/s ECIL was examined by TI Pakistan, and beside other complaints SEMICECIL that the department was not providing documents in time, ( obviously an allegation or ttvaion under Rule No 2 (f))y it was also established thatthe said procurement hhas been processed in violation of Purjab Procurement Rules, 2009, as ‘the evaluation criteria was based i scores of technical plus financial marks, and not the lowest evaluated responsive bid. ‘This i also to point out that selection of Consultancy firms is to processed under Rule No. 36. Procedures of open competitive bidding, which a single stage ~ two envelope procedure, In this method the procuring agency shall evaluate the technical proposal in a manner prescribed in ruvanee, without reference to the price and reject any preposal which do not conform to the specified requirements, The financial proposals of bids shall be ‘opened publicly at a time, date wr} venue announced end communicated to the bidders in advance. After the evaluation and approval of the technical propos! the procuring agency, shall at ting within the i period, publicly open the financial proposals of the technically ‘accepted bids only ,and the bid found to be the lowest evaluated bid shall be accepted. Any other method of selection, like PEC prescribed method of QCBS at 80:20, or Punjab aay ment Services Housing Foundation method prescribed in this RF P. 85:19 being the Chngal and financial weight ages, are not allowed in PPR 2004, and all such contracts vrrarded, are t be declared as mis-procurement under PP Rule No 50, and are subject to action tebe taken under Rule 2 () corrupt practices. The los if incurred to the exchequer due to the sch legal awards, are o be recovered at 10 times the loss fo government the terms of Integrity Pact” [ANON-PARTISAN, NON-PROFIT COALITION AGAINST CORRUPTION Sea vane exempted rom tak WIS 2 (36) (c) a1, Tax Ordnance 2001 TRANS PAR A Os ox Continuation Sheet No... INTERNATIONAL-PAKISTAN “The other violations committed is under the Rule No 35, Evaluation Report to be provided to dadors 10 days before award for filing objections, which has not ‘been complied for the obvious reasons. “1 akistan fects that this is perfect cse of compton as described in Rule 2(), “corrupt and Fradclent practices” includes the collusive pracices among bidders (prior to orafter bid evnission) designed to establish bid prices at artificial, no ‘competitive levels and to deprive the seruring agencies ofthe benefits of fee ard open competition. We request the Chief Minister to kindly constitute a committee to investigate the allegations made by M/s ECIL, for deliberate violations ‘of Rules by Executive Director (Engineering) Punjab Government Services Housing Foundation, and the efforts to award this contract to Ms Nespak, wich is also the previous employer of ME ‘Aftab Islan Agha, and not following the Rules No 36 and Rule No 35, and against the advices of MD PPRA, sent to the departément vide PPRA letters dated 22 June 2010, and 29 June 2010. Rule of Law is supreme in Pakistan, The ultimate goal of Public Procurement Rules 2004, beside tnsuring, that the procurements are conducted in a fai ‘and transparent manner, the object of procurement brings value for money to the agency ‘and the procurement process is efficient and ‘economical, is to make corruption @ ‘high risk” and “ low return” undertaking. ‘TIP would like to quote Supreme Court order given of 128" April 2010, in the case of award of siktabllion dollar LNG contract to GDF-Suea, in which the SC has announced that its the duty ‘ofthe Court to ensure the application of Publis Procurement Rules 2004. Yorg Sincerely, Copies forwarded for the information of; 1. Chief Justice, Lahore High Court, Lahore 3 Br. Taugir Shah, Principal Secretary to CM Punjab, 3. Managing Director, PPRA Punjab, Lahore. fo” No. MD(PPRA)1-10/2009 it} GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB SS, SERVICES & GENERAL ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT (PUNJAB PROCUREMENT REGULA’ RITY) Tel. 042-99211490 a TORY AUTHO! Dated Lahore, the June 22 , 2010 To The Managing Director. Punjab Goverment Servant, Housing Foundation, Punjab, Lahore. Subject:- COM! (NT. INST PI NT. Hi FOU! \TION, HF). Please refer to PPRA, Cabinet Division, Islamabad's letter No. F.1(44)/DD- I/PPRA/2010, dated June 11, 2010, and this office letter of even number dated 17.6.2010, on the subject noted above. 2 Keeping in view the complaint of ECIL and the subsequent letter from the Cabinet Division dated 11.6.2010, the captioned procurement process if carried on would amount to mis-procurement under rule 50 of Punjab Procurement Rules 2009. 3. You are therefore required to re-invite the tenders avoiding any breach of these rules and keeping in view the requirements of transparency regarding the principle of “equal opportunity”. 4. This Is for your kind Information and necessary action please. (IMRAN NASIR KHAN) ‘Managing Director PPRA cc: 1. Managing Director, PPRA, Istamabad. 2 Accountant General Punjab, Lahore. 3.—Chairman, Transparency International, Karachi, (2 No. MD(PPRA)1-10/2009 {—-.\ GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB SS SERVICES & GENERAL ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT PUNJAB PROCUREMENT RE\ Te’, 042-99211490 ( >UREM ;GULATORY AUTHORITY) i Dated Lahore, the June 29 , 2010 0 The Managing Director. Punjab Government Servant, Housing Foundation, Punjab, Lahore. Subject: COMPLAINT AGAINST PUNJAB GOVERNMENT SERVANTS HOUSING FOUNDATION HF). Please refer to this department's letter of even number dated 22.6.2010 on the subject noted above. 2. Your office letter number PGSHF/PA/ED9E)/06/2010-8968 Is not satisfactory, as the entire process has already been declared as mis-procurement under rule 50 of Punjab Procurement Rules. 3. Tt has come to the knowledge of this office that tenders have not been re- invited, thus violating the instructions given in our letter referred above. 4. You are required to do the needful under intimation to this office. | _! (IMRAN NASIR KHAN) Managing Director PPRA cc: Chief Minister's Secretariat, Lahore. Managing Director, PPRA, Islamabad. Accountant General Punjab, Lahore. Director General (Audit), Punjab, Lahore. Chairman, Transparency International, Karachi. \\ sue No. MD(PPRA)1-10/2009 GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB SERVICES & GENERAL ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT (PUNJAB PROCUREMENT REGULATORY AUTHORITY) Tel, 042-99211490 Dated Lahore, the June 11 , 2010 To - the Secretary. Government of the Punjab, Housing Department, ‘Subject:- COMPLAINT AGAINST PUNJAB GOVERNMENT SERVANTS Hi 1G FO! ‘TION, SHE). Please find endosed a complaint No. ECIL/D&C/67/2010/2600, dated 09,06.2010, received from M/s Engineering Consultants International (Pvt) Ltd. (ECIL) regarding violation of PPRA received from Transparency International. 2. You are requested to seek comments from the PGSH Foundation regarding the enclosed complaint on the captioned subject. 3. ‘There has allegedly been a violation of Rule 36 of Punjab Procurement Rules 2009 by the concerned officers/afficials. 4. A reply within three days would be appreciated please. J (IMRAN NASIR KHAN) ‘Managing Director PPRA 1. ° Chief Minister’s Secretariat, Punjab. 2. Chairman, Transparency International Pakistan. omen conaurenre mmnTonn rete | Sate apts ate nS Ess) SSeS SS

    You might also like