You are on page 1of 2

Letter to the Editor

Nephron 1992:61:470 471

A.H. Tzamaloukas
Pratap S. Avasthi
Hypoglycemia during Hemodialysis
VA Medical Center,
Albuquerque, N.Mex.. USA
in Diabetics Treated with Insulin

Dear Sir,
Hypoglycemia is a potentially lethal com­ before dialysis in group B. In group A. hypo­
plication of renal failure and dialysis [1-4], glycemia was symptomatic during dialysis in
Hemodialysis against a hath containing no more than 60% of the instances requiring glu­
glucose may aggravate this complication. cose infusion. In contrast, in group B hypo­
Certain other features of the patients, such as glycemia was usually not severe and asympto­
insulin injections and glycemic control, could matic, and was discovered in the course of
also potentially affect dialysis-induced hy­ routine postdialysis blood measurements. A
poglycemia. We compared 16 diabetic pa­ consequence of this difference between
tients who had frequent (in more than 25% of groups A and B was that the frequency of
the measurements) hypoglycemia (blood glu­ blood glucose determinations during or im­
cose <3.3 mmol/l) during or immediately mediately after dialysis was 4 times higher in
after hemodialysis (group A) to another group A than in group B. Deaths from hypo­
16 diabetic patients who had infrequent (in glycemia during or immediately after dialysis
less than 10% of the measurements) hypogly­ were not noted in either group.
cemia during or immediately after hemodial­ The development of hypoglycemia during
ysis (group B). Only I patient in group B was a hemodialysis was probably facilitated by the
woman. Hemodialysis was performed against absence of glucose in the bath, with conse­
a bath containing acetate as a substrate for quent net loss of blood glucose into the dialy-
bicarbonate and no glucose. All patients were sate. and by the presence of acetate in the
receiving insulin throughout the dialysis peri­ bath. Acetate inhibits the release of an insu-
od. No subject received drugs associated with lin-counterregulatory hormone [6], During
hypoglycemia in dialysis patients, such as ()- the last 2 years, we have been routinely dialyz­
adrenergic blocking agents or aspirin. Blood ing diabetics against a bath containing bicar­
glycosylated hemoglobin was measured by a bonate and glucose in a concentration of
method suitable for dialysis patients [5], Sta­ 11.1 mmol/l. Although the diabetics currently
tistical comparison was carried out by the dialyzed by this regime are different from
two-tailed Student’s t test for continuous var­ those included in groups A and B, the inci­
iables and by the %2 test for categorical var­ dence of symptomatic hypoglycemia has
iables. been very low in the past 2 years, even in
Table I shows the comparison of the two diabetics with poor glycemic control, who
groups. All parameters of glycemic control exhibit at times predialysis hypoglycemia.
were statistically worse in group A than in Diabetics receiving insulin, who have
group B. Furthermore, whereas in group A poor glycemic control, are prone to severe
hypoglycemia was more frequent during dial­ hypoglycemia during hemodialysis. It ap­
ysis than in routine predialysis measurements pears that the use of a dialysate containing
(p <0.001), its frequency did not differ be­ bicarbonate and glucose prevents to a great
tween blood samples obtained during or im­ extent this dialysis-induced hypoglycemia.
mediately after dialysis and those obtained

A. 11. Tzamaloukas © 1992 S. Karger AG. Basel


Renal Section (IIIC), VA Medical Center 0028-2766/92/
2100 Ridgecrest Dr. S t 0614-0470S2.75/0
Albuquerque. NM 87108 (USA)
Table 1. Demographic parameters and
Group A Group B p value
glycémie control
Age, years 3 8 -6 8 3 2 -7 5
53 ± 9 58 ± 11 NS
1DDM/NIDDM 10/6 5/11 NS
Daily insulin, U 8 -6 0 8 -4 5
29+14 21 ± 11 NS
Dialysis duration, months 3 -7 8 10-126
22 ± 21 41 ±33 <0.05

CO

OC
Glucose, mmoI/la 5.4-10.0

1
II.5 ±4.2 7.5 ±1.4 <0.005

00
sC
Glycosylated hemoglobin, % 8.1-16.8

1
11.8 ±2.5 7.0 ±1.1 <0.001
Hyperglycemia, %b 0 -7 6 0 -3 3
35 ±22 9 ± 10 <0.001
Hypoglycemia, W 4 -3 8 0 -1 1
19 ± 11 3±3 <0.001
Dialysis hypoglycemia, %u 2 5 -6 8 0 -6
43 ±14 3±2 <0.001

Results on the first line are the range, on the second line, the mean ±S D .
IDDM = Insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus; NIDDM = non-insulin-dependent diabetes
mellitus.
11 Routine predialysis blood values.
b Routine predialysis blood glucose levels >11.1 mmol/!.
c Routine predialysis blood glucose levels <3.3m m ol/l.
ll Blood glucose levels <3.3 mmol/l during or immediately after hemodialysis.

References

1 Block MB, Rubenstein AH: Spontaneous hy­ 4 Avram MM, Wolf RE, Gan A, Pahilan AN. Paik 6 Orskov H, Hansen AP, Hansen HE, Alberti
poglycemia in diabetic patients with renal insuf­ SK, Iancu M : Uremic Hypoglycemia. A preven­ KGMM, NoyGA, Nosadini R: Acetate: Inhibi­
ficiency. JAMA 1970:213:1863-1866. table life-threatening complication. NY State J tor of growth hormone hypersecretion in diabet­
2 White MG, Kurtzman NA: Hypoglycemia in Med 1984;84:593-596. ic and non-diabetic uremic subjects. Acta En-
diabetics with renal insufficiency. JAMA 1971: 5 Tzamaloukas HA. Hsi 1C, Quintana BJ. Merlin doctrinol 1982;99:551-558.
215:117. TL, Avasthi PS: Glycosylated hemoglobin mea­
3 Greenblatt DJ: Insulin sensitivity in renal fail­ sured by affinity chromatography in diabetic
ure. Fatal hypoglycemia following dialysis. NY and non-diabetic patients on chronic dialysis.
State J Med 1974:74:1040-1041. West J Med 1989;150:415-419.

471

You might also like