You are on page 1of 9

SSPC Visual Standards

Update 2003:
A Picture
Is Worth
a Thousand
Words

U
By Aimée Beggs and
Michael Damiano, SSPC,
sers of SSPC’s surface preparation specifications are well aware
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
of how difficult it is to verbally describe the appearance of a surface cleaned to
Editor’s Note: The photographs in this
article do not reflect the photographic SSPC-SP 6/NACE No. 3, Commercial Blast Cleaning. Therefore, SSPC has created
quality of the actual visual standard four supplementary sets of reference photographs (VIS 1, 3, 4, and 5) that pro-
publications and should not be used to vide illustrations of the degrees of cleanliness defined in the written surface
judge the condition of painted and
unpainted steel surfaces. For more preparation specifications. The illustrations do not replace the written specifica-
information about the visual standards, tions. They are intended for comparison to surfaces encountered in the field be-
go to www.sspc.org. fore and after cleaning in order to help the user visualize the differences between
the cleanliness degrees described by the written specifications. A text guide ex-
plaining the procedures for proper use accompanies each set of photographs.

JPCL • February 2003 • PCE 55


Fig. 1: Rust Grade Conditions A through D in VIS 1

Table 1: Blast Cleaning Specification Summary*

SSPC/NACE Designation Title Final Condition Who Establishes


SP 7/No. 4 Brush-off Blast Cleaning All visible oil, grease, loose paint, the Visual Standards
loose rust, and loose mill scale are All of the photographs and the text
removed. are subject to committee review.
SP 14/No. 8 Industrial Blast Cleaning Visible oil, grease, and loosely Members of the SSPC Surface Prepa-
adherent materials are removed. ration Steering Committee represent-
Evenly distributed and tightly ing owners, specifiers, and contrac-
adherent material may remain on tors are present during the cleaning
10% of each 9 in.2 of surface. and photography sessions. Once the
SP 6/No. 3 Commercial Blast Cleaning Visible oil and grease are removed. Steering Committee has made the ini-
Only shadows, streaks, and stains of tial selection of photographs, they are
other contaminants are allowed on balloted, along with the guide text, to
33% of each 9 in.2 of surface. all the members of the Surface Prepa-
SP 10/No. 2 Near-White Blast Cleaning Same as SP 6/No. 3, but shadows, ration Group Committee for review
streaks, and stains are allowed only and final selection, according to
on 5% of each 9 in.2 of surface. SSPC’s Standards Development Pro-
SP 5/No. 1 White Metal Blast Cleaning No visible contaminants are cedures.
permitted anywhere on the surface. This article will discuss SSPC’s four
* For a complete description of each degree of cleanliness, consult the written standards. sets of reference photographs illus-
56 JPCL • February 2003 • PCE www.paintsquare.com
trating degrees of cleanliness: SSPC-VIS 1 (revised 2002) • Condition D: Surface completely covered with rust,
for blast-cleaned surfaces; SSPC-VIS 3 (to be revised in with pitting visible
2003) illustrating degrees of cleanliness of power- and • Condition G: Coating system (multiple coats) applied
hand tool-cleaned surfaces; SSPC-VIS 4 (issued 2001) il- over mill scale-bearing steel
lustrating degrees of cleanliness of surfaces cleaned by Conditions A through D illustrate steel that has never
waterjetting; and SSPC-VIS 5 (also issued in 2001) illus- been painted (Fig. 1). Condition G (added in 2002) illus-
trating surfaces cleaned by wet abrasive blasting methods. trates previously painted surfaces (Fig. 2). In order to il-
A fifth set of photographs (SSPC-VIS 2, revised 2000) il- lustrate the effect of pitting on appearance after cleaning,
lustrating various percentages of rust on painted steel sur- Condition G is divided into three subsections showing
faces will also be discussed. each of the five cleanliness degrees over (1) previously
coated and rusted smooth steel, (2) previously coated
SSPC-VIS 1: and rusted steel with moderate pitting, and (3) previous-
Dry Abrasive Blast Cleaning ly coated and rusted steel with severe pitting.
This revised standard illustrates both uncoated and previ- Ten additional photographs illustrate the effect of profile
ously coated steel surfaces blast cleaned to five degrees of and lighting angle on steel blast cleaned to White Metal.
cleanliness corresponding to the written specifications
(Table 1). SSPC-VIS 3:
Each degree of cleaning in the table is illustrated over Hand and Power Tool Cleaning
five initial surface conditions: SSPC-VIS 3 illustrates surfaces cleaned to comply with
• Condition A: Surface covered with adherent mill scale SSPC-SP 2, Hand Tool Cleaning; SSPC-SP 3, Power Tool
with little or no rust Cleaning; and SSPC-SP 11, Power Tool Cleaning to Bare
• Condition B: Surface completely covered with mill scale Metal (Fig. 3). Table 2 summarizes the requirements of
and rust the specifications included in the current VIS 3.
• Condition C: Surface completely covered with rust, with In addition to Initial Conditions A, B, C, D, and G
little or no pitting visible (moderate pitting), as in VIS 1, the photographs illus-

Using the Reference Photographs

T
o use any of the visual 4.Compare the photograph with the tion labeled G WJ-3.
standards discussed above, cleaned surface. 4. After waterjetting, compare the
follow the steps outlined For example, suppose a previously illustration with the cleaned surface.
here. painted surface is required to be 5. If the coating can be applied over
1.Select the method of cleaning cleaned to SSPC-SP 12 WJ 3 (thor- Light Flash Rusting, move to the il-
(waterjetting, dry blasting, etc.) to ough cleaning using waterjetting). lustrations of Flash Rusting.
choose the appropriate VIS photos. The process would be as follows. 6.Because the surface has been
2.Match the condition of the sur- 1.Since waterjetting is required, use cleaned to WJ-3 (thorough cleaning)
face before cleaning with one of the the SSPC-VIS 4/NACE VIS 7 reference and the permissible Flash Rust Level
initial conditions illustrated in the photographs. is L (light), immediately before
appropriate set of photographs 2.If the surface has been previously coating application, the amount of
(Condition A, B, C, etc.). painted with a non-brittle coating sys- flash rusting should be no more
3.Select the photograph illustrating tem, it matches Initial Condition G. than is illustrated in photographs C
the degree of cleanliness desired for 3. In the series of photographs illus- WJ-3 L and D WJ-3 L.
the appropriate initial condition. trating Condition G, select the illustra-

www.paintsquare.com JPCL • February 2003 • PCE 57


G1 Initial Condition G3 SP 14, cleaned to Industrial Blast

G2 Initial Condition G3 SP 6, cleaned to Commercial Blast

G3 Initial Condition G3 SP 10, cleaned to Near-White

G3 SP 7, cleaned to Brush-off Blast G3 SP 5, cleaned to White Metal

Fig. 2: VIS 1, Condition G for previously painted steel


58 JPCL • February 2003 • PCE www.paintsquare.com
Initial Condition Needle gun cleaning to SP 3

Hand tool cleaning to SP 2 Power wire brush cleaning to SP 3

Rotary flaps and non-woven discs were used to achieve SP 11 Sanding disc cleaning to SP 3

Fig. 3: VIS 3 shows surfaces before and after hand and power tool cleaning with a variety of tools.
Note that VIS 3 will be revised in 2003. Some illustrations may change.

trate two additional conditions of previously painted varies with the type of tool used, VIS 3 illustrates each of
surfaces: Initial Condition E, previously painted surface the seven initial surface conditions described above pre-
with light-colored paint applied over blast-cleaned steel; pared to SSPC-SP 3 using hand tools, power wire brush, a
and Initial Condition F, previously painted surface with sanding disc, and a needle gun. The SSPC-SP 11 condition
zinc-rich paint applied over blast-cleaned steel. In Initial was achieved using rotary flaps and non-woven discs.
Conditions E and F, the paint is mostly intact. During 2003, SSPC will be revising VIS 3 to include
Because the appearance of a power tool-cleaned surface photographs of surfaces cleaned to the new SSPC-SP 15,

www.paintsquare.com JPCL • February 2003 • PCE 59


VIS 4 G3 Initial Condition VIS 4 G3 WJ-3, Thorough Cleaning

VIS 4 G3 WJ-4, Light Cleaning VIS 4 G3 WJ-2, Very Thorough Cleaning

Fig. 4: Samples from VIS 4 G3

Commercial Grade Power Tool Clean-


ing, issued in 2002. Commercial
Grade Power Tool Cleaning requires
all visible contaminants to be re-
Table 2: Hand and Power Tool Cleaning Specification Summary* moved. To differentiate it from SP 11,
SP 15 allows random staining on up
SSPC Designation Title Description to 33% of each unit area (9 in.2) of
SP 2 Hand Tool Cleaning All loose material removed using the surface. The text guide accompa-
hand tools without power assistance nying the photographs will also be
SP 3 Power Tool Cleaning All loose materials removed using revised and updated to include the
hand-held power tools new SP 15 description.
SP 11 Power Tool Cleaning to Bare Metal All visible contamination removed,
with exception of stains in deep pits; SSPC-VIS 4/NACE VIS 7:
surface has 1 mil (25 µm) profile. Surfaces Prepared by Waterjetting
SP 15 Commercial Grade Power All visible contamination removed; This visual standard, jointly developed
Tool Cleaning** random staining permitted by SSPC and NACE International, illus-
on no more than 33% of each 9 in.2 trates the four cleanliness conditions
of surface. described in SSPC-SP 12/NACE No. 5,
* For a complete description of each degree of cleanliness, consult the written standards. Surface Preparation and Cleaning of
** Note that this specification is not illustrated in the 1993 version of SSPC-VIS 3. Illustrations of SP 15 will be added
to the 2003-2004 revision. Steel and Other Hard Materials by

60 JPCL • February 2003 • PCE www.paintsquare.com


VIS 4 D WJ, Initial Condition before cleaning VIS 4 D WJ-3, Thorough Cleaning

VIS 4 D WJ-3, Thorough Cleaning before flash rusting VIS 4 D WJ-3L, Thorough Cleaning and light flash rusting

VIS 4 D WJ-3M, Thorough Cleaning and medium flash rusting VIS 4 D WJ-3H, Thorough Cleaning and heavy flash rusting

Fig. 5: Samples from VIS 4


Note: Different panels were used for each of the four lower photographs.

www.paintsquare.com JPCL • February 2003 • PCE 61


VIS 5, Initial Condition C VIS 5 C WAB 6, Condition C, cleaned to SP 6 VIS 5 C WAB 10, Condition C, cleaned to SP 10

VIS 5, C WAB 10L, with light flash rusting VIS 5 C WAB 10H, with heavy flash rusting

Fig. 6: Samples from VIS 5, Wet Abrasive Blast Cleaning

High- and Ultrahigh-Pressure Water Jetting Prior to Re- of photographs, water at high pressures, without addition
coating, over each of the five initial surface conditions (A of any abrasive media, is used as the cleaning agent.
through G). In SSPC-SP 12/NACE No. 5 and in this series Table 3 summarizes the requirements of the specifications
included in SSPC-VIS 4.
Because wet methods of surface
Table 3: Waterjetting Specification Summary* preparation often result in flash rust-
ing of the surface, and because coat-
Designation Title Description ings vary in the amount of flash rust-
WJ-4 Light Cleaning Surface free of visible oil, grease, and all loosely adher- ing over which they may be applied,
ent material; tightly adherent material is permitted. SSPC-SP 12/NACE No. 5 also defines
WJ-3 Thorough Cleaning Randomly dispersed rust stains and thin deposits three levels of flash rusting (light,
of tightly adherent material permitted on 33% of each moderate, and heavy) that can devel-
9 in.2 of surface op on surfaces after waterjetting.
WJ-2 Very Thorough Cleaning Same as WJ-3, but limited to 5% of each 9 in.2 These levels are illustrated in SSPC-
of surface VIS 4/NACE VIS 7 on surfaces with
WJ-1 Bare Substrate Surface free of all material; discoloration of surface Initial Conditions C and D after clean-
may be present. ing to WJ-3 and WJ-2.
* For a complete description of each degree of cleanliness, consult the written standards. In the near future, each of the
62 JPCL • February 2003 • PCE www.paintsquare.com
WJ definitions in the current SSPC-SP 12/NACE No. 5 the number of initial conditions and levels of cleanliness
specification will be issued as a separate document (paral- illustrated were based on the pre-existing photographs.
leling the SSPC/NACE dry abrasive blast cleaning specifi-
cations). A joint task group of SSPC and NACE members Conclusion
is currently working on this division process. Proper surface preparation is crucial to coating perfor-
mance. The coating supplier, the owner/specifier, and the
SSPC-VIS 5/NACE VIS 9: coating contractor must work together to ensure the opti-
Surfaces Prepared mum performance of any coating. Over the years, the
by Wet Abrasive Blast Cleaning SSPC surface preparation specifications have been recog-
These photographs illustrate steel surfaces cleaned by nized as the U.S. coating industry standards for defining
wet abrasive blast cleaning to correspond to the written levels of surface cleanliness. By illustrating surface condi-
standards SSPC-SP 6/NACE No. 3 and SSPC-SP 10/NACE tions that are frequently hard to describe verbally, SSPC
No. 2 for Commercial and Near-White Blast Cleaning, re- hopes to assist all parties in a coating project when they
spectively. Two initial conditions (Condition C and Con- encounter situations in which a picture is worth a thou-
dition D) are shown, each cleaned to Commercial and sand words.
Near-White levels. In addition, the three levels of flash
rusting are shown over each cleanliness level.
The photographs used in SSPC-VIS 5/NACE VIS 9 are
reproduced with permission of International/Akzo Nobel.
Because SSPC did not take photographs for this standard,

SSPC-VIS 2: How Rusty IS It?

S SPC-VIS 2 was created in


1968 as a supplement to
ASTM D610, Standard
Method of Evaluating Degree of
Rusting on Painted Steel Surfaces,
al percentage of rust on a surface.
Three rust distributions are illustrat-
ed, showing each of nine rust grades
(based on percentage of area rusted),
for a total of 27 color illustrations. A
SSPC-VIS 2 is used in much the
same way as the surface prepara-
tion visual standards. The user first
selects the rust dispersion most
closely matching the surface being
to assist end users in evaluating the black-and-white schematic opposite examined (spot, general, or pin-
percentage of rust on a specified each color illustration shows the ac- point rusting) and then compares
surface area in order to decide on tual percentage of rust (determined the illustrations of that rust disper-
an appropriate maintenance strate- by computer analysis) on the surface sion in VIS 2 with the surface to de-
gy. Nine black-and-white schemat- area. In addition, the text of the ac- termine the approximate percentage
ics were printed, along with four companying guide has been com- of rust in the test area. This infor-
color photographs and the written pletely revised. mation can be used to help deter-
standard (which in 1968 was identi- SSPC furnished the text and mine an appropriate maintenance
cal to the ASTM standard). schematics of VIS 2 to ASTM to use strategy for a specific area of a
In 2000, SSPC revised both the in its 2001 revision of the D610 stan- structure, for example, the bottom
text and illustrations in VIS 2. The dard. Although the text of the revised flange of a bridge beam. It is also
number of rust grades illustrated D610 specification has been format- useful for evaluating the amount of
has been expanded to illustrate the ted to ASTM specifications, the tech- rust on a painted test panel after
effect of variations in rust distribu- nical content is identical to that in exposure testing.
tion on the appearance of the actu- the guide text of SSPC-VIS 2.

www.paintsquare.com JPCL • February 2003 • PCE 63

You might also like