Professional Documents
Culture Documents
From: CPA
RE: Sweet Temptations Ltd (STL)
Accounting Issues
- Issue: STL purchased 100% of the outstanding shares of Grabba Java for $750,000. The issue is
how the acquisition needs to be reported and how the balance sheets need to be consolidated.
- Analysis: As per IFRS 3, STL should recognize goodwill as of the acquisition date measured as the
excess of (a) over (b) below:
a) The aggregate of:
a. Consideration transferred
i. $750,000 paid for the outstanding shares
b. Amount of any NCI interest in Gaba Java
i. $0 = NCI – 100% ownership by STL
b) Net of the acquisition-date amounts of the identifiable assets acquires and liabilities
assumed
a. $0 – fair value of Grabba Java’s fixed assets equal to book value
- Recommendation:
o Goodwill should be measured at $622,750
- Risk : Risk of understating Goodwill
o Assertion: Accuracy & Valuation
o Procedure:
Examine and review documentation related to share purchase
Recalculate the A.D and Goodwill based on the financial statements of Graba
Java and information in the share purchase documentation
OFSL Risk
Approach
Given that the bookkeeper does all of the accounting work there is no segregation of duties. A
Substantive approach should likely be taken and consideration also needs to be given to the audit
approach related to the newly acquired company, Grabba Java. Component materiality will need to be
set with specific audit procedures related to the new subsidiary. A substantive approach involves no
reliance on existent controls.
Materiality
The users of RRI’s financial statements are Meghan and the bank,
Given that STL is a for profit company both users are concerned with it’s profitability meaning
normalized net income which will be used as the base.
The recommended rate for materiality of normalized net income is usually between 3%-7%. Given that
STL has had steady earnings over the past year this indicates that the sensitivity to material
misstatement is not large. As such, 5% of normalized net income is used for the calculation of overall
materiality.
Performance materiality is set at 60% of overall materiality. The percentage has been set based on the
fact that the overall financial statement level risk is assessed to be on the higher end.