DESIGN OF SLIPWAY AT KANDLA PORT A Design Project Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements (for the award of the Degree of MASTER OF TECHNOLOGY in OCEAN ENGINEERING J By ASHOK PITAMBER TRIVEDI 7 OCEAN ENGINEERING CENTRE | INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY MADRAS CHENNAI 600 036 THE.114 MAY 1999CERTIFICATE This is to certify that this Design Project on ‘Design of slipway at kandla port’ submitted by Mr. Ashok Pitamber Trivedi to the Ocean Engineering Centre, IIT Madras, Chennai 600 0036 in partial fulfilment of requirements for the award of the degree of Master of Technology in Ocean Engineering is a record of bonafide work carried out by him under my guidance. Cf WOrdbar Ce Prof.C.P.Vendhan Dr.R.Sundaravadivelu Head of Centre Associate Professor Ocean Engineering Centre Guide IIT Madras, Chennai 600 036 Ocean Engineering Centre IIT Madras, Chennai 600 0036ACKNOWLEDGEMENT 1 feel immensely happy to express my deep sense of gratitude and thanks to Dr. R. SUNDARAVADIVELU for his valuable guidance during the entire period of this project. I wish to express my special thanks to Prof. C.P. VENDHAN, Head of the centre, Ocean Engineering Centre, for the facilities provided to complete this project successfully. 1 deeply express my special thanks to All Project Associate for his kind help at every minute. I express my sincere thanks to other project staff for their help and co- operation. AMeeletp (A. P. TRIVEDI)ABSTRACT 1. Port of Kandla, located on the northern bank of Kandla creek, is the only major port in the State of Gujarat. 2. The cargo traffic handled by the port has shown a consistent increase. Between 1989-90 and 1994-95, the total cargo traffic handled by the port has increased from 18.9 million tonnes to 38.0 million tonnes, registering an average annual rate of growth of 8.5%. 3, With the growth in the volume of cargo traffic, the number of vessels calling at the port has gone up from 980 in 1989-90 to around 1215 in 1993-94. Based on the trafic projections and the average parcel load of vessels, the vessels traffic at the port is expected to go upto 1660 by the tum of the century. 4. Presently, the port has a total fleet of 32 port craft (28 nos. at Kandla and 4 nos. at Vadinar), According to the indications given by KPT, the total requirement of port craft is expected to go up to 40 (33 at Kandla and 7 at Vadinar) by the end of the Eighth Plan and 49 (38 at Kandla and 11 at Vadinar) by the end of the Ninth Plan period, to meet the anticipated increase in the ship traffic at the port 5, The maintenance and repair facilities presently available in Kandla Port include one floating steel drydock for underwater repairs and one maintenance jetty for aflat repair of craft. ‘The existing drydock can accommodate two bigger size craft at atime and its annual capacity is estimated at 730 repair days (365 days x 2 craft), which is grossly inadequate for proper maintenance of the existing fleet. Presently, only the bigger size craft are being taken on the drydock for ‘underwater repairs while the smaller craft are being taken on the hard for repairs during low tides. Because of constaint in the drydock facility, the schedule repairs of the craft are not being catried out at regular intervals. This has resulted in frequent breakdowns and in some longer downtime for repairs. ‘The waiting period of craft for drydock facility has gone up significantly during the last 2 years compared to the preceding 2 years. iiiTherefore the stepway facility has been proposed. The proposed slipway will work in tandem with the existing floating drydock. It is proposed to carry out all underwater repairs of the bigger craft (having displacement of above 140 tonnes) at the floating drydock and that of the smaller craft on the slipway proposed. ‘The slipway generally used for repairing purpose of small crafts. Slipway at Kandla Port is in the north of the maintenance jetty. Proposed slipway size is 102 m length and 11.0 m wide and size of repair bay is 36 m in length and width respectively. ‘The slipway consists of 900 mm diameter RCC bored pile at 6.0 m spacing along with longitudinal direction and 5.5 m along the transverse direction supporting t0 the 500 mm thick slab with rails for cradle movement, Both side of slipway a RCC wall of 300 mm thick and a walk way has been provided for case to seating of craft and hauling operation. ‘A typical pile bent is analysed as a two dimensional frame using STAAD Mm package. and the design of structural elements are carried out by using IS 456 1998 and SP16 and IS 1893.CONTENTS CERTIFICATE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ABSTRACT NOMENCLATURE Chapter! INTRODUCTION 1.2 Soil profile 13 Hydrographic data 1.4 Scope of project Chapter? LAYOUT AND PARAMETERS OF SLIPWAY 2.1 Layout of slipway 2.2. Craft parameters 2.3 Cradle dimensions 2.4 — Slipway parameters Chapter3 ESTIMATION OF FORCES, 3.1 Preliminary design of structural member 3.2. F 3.3. Calculation of pile length 3.4 Dead load calculation of side wall ity depth calculation 3.5 Dead load calculation of beam and column 3.6 Dead load calculation of piles 3.7 Dead load calculation of slab 3.8 Load for design purposes 3.9 Seismic force Chapter 4 ANALYSIS OF STRUCTURE 4.1 Analysis 4.2 Dead load itt a PP wp pe Noo fo 4 42 43 4 4 16 8 16Chapter5 DESIGN OF STRUCTURAL MEMBER 30 5.1 Designof pile 30 5.2 Design of side wall Oe 5.3. Design of slab 35 5.4 Design of walk way beam 34 Chapter 6 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS Ao LIST OF FIGURES Fig no 1 General arrangement of slip way AL Fig no 2 Key-plan 42 Fig no 3 Soil profile of bore log 4s Fig no 4 Plan of slipway 4h Fig no 6 Cross section of slipway 46 Fig no 7 Level details 47 Fig no 8 Reinforcement details of piles 48,43 viCHAPTER 1 1.1 INTRODUCTION Port of Kandla, the only major port in the State of Gujarat on the West Coast of India, is located on the northem bank of Kandla Creek, about 10 km. Off the Gulf of Kutch, at Latitude 23° North and Longitude 70° East. It was commissioned as a major port in 1957. ‘The port has excellent natural and well-protected harbour. Being tidal creek, the rise of the water level varies between 4 mts, and 8 mts. Existence of a number of shoals in the approach to the port and frequent geomorphological changes at the mouth of creek, limit the draft and overall length of the vessels calling at the port. LOA of vessels entering the port is limited to 225.55 mtrs. A draft of 8.14 mtrs. Is available all- round-the-year. Inftastructural facilities include A floating steel drydock, which caters to repairs and maintenance of port craft. ‘The drydock can accommodate vessels having displacement upto 2,700 tonnes and a maximum length of 100 mits., beam of 15 mitrs. and draft of 4.5 mts. The drydock is linked to a repair jetty, equipped with a 10 ton capacity crane. MARINE CRAFT ‘At present, KPT has a total fleet of 32 propelled and non-propelled craft. The repair and maintenance of these craft are being carried out in the existing steel floating drydock and the maintenance jetty located adjacent to the drydock. The capacity of the existing facilities is grossly inadequate to cater to all the scheduled maintenance and break-down repairs of the present fleet. As a result, the craft have either to lie idle waiting for the drydock or their scheduled maintenance repairs are being delayed/postploned. Besides, KPT is carrying out the repairs of the small craft on thehard, as a temporary measure, which is not only time consuming but also uneconomic/inefficient, This has adversely affected the effective availability of craft and consequently the port operations. The situation is likely to get further aggrevated in future with acquisition of more number of craft being planned by the port to handle the projected volume of vessel's traffic. In view of the above, Kandla Port Trust (KPT) entrusted to find out the extent and type of augmentation of repair facilities required in the port for undertaking efficient and economic repair of the port craft keeping in view the likely increase in the fleet strength in future. So that construction of slipway has been reported. 1.2 SOIL PROFILE A typical soil data form of borehole log at the location is obtained from the Kandla Port Trust. The bore log is shown in Fig. No.3. The soil strata consists of the following: First 10 m portion of the soil below ground level at slipway site is gray silty clay. Below this, there is a 10 m thick layer of silty sand. Below this, a layer of stiff brown silty clay of 6 m thick and a layer of hard silty clay with gypsum of 7 m thick is found and then from 34.0 m to 45.0 m i.e. -11 m layer of the very hard silty clay or clay sand. 1.3 HYDROGRAPHIC DATA Mean sea level 439 Mean high water spring +6.7 Mean high water neap 45.7 Mean low water neap +1.08‘Mean low water spring 08 1.4 SCOPE OF PROJECT ‘The scope of the project is to design slipway for handling crafts having displacement upto 140 tonnes. It is proposed to build the slipway so that the crafts can be brought in or taken out above +5.60 m tide level. The slipway consists of the following: Bottom slab supported on piles Rail supported on the bottom slab Side walls with columns on top of end piles. ‘Walkway beam supported on columns ‘The design of the above construction of slipway are given in this report.CHAPTER 2 LAYOUT AND PARAMETERS OF SLIPWAY 2.1 LAYOUT OF SLIPWAY Proposed slipway is shown in fig. 1.Length of the slipway is 102 m and width of the slipway is 12.20 m and having a slope of 1:12 and it is supported by the R.C.C bored cast in situ piles. Level of the forward end is 0.2 m and levels of the lastward enc ios +8.7 m. This slipway is protected by side walls to avoid the siltation of clay on the slipway and vessel can be protected during its sealing over slipway from the wave. After taking over the vessel on slipway, vessel will transfer through the cradles to the transfer bay / Repair bay. And the size of the transfer bay is 30 x 30. Ata time ‘two vessel can be repaired in the transfer bay / repair bay. Slipway consists of the following facilities: 1, Pump room 2. Workshop 3. Office room 4, Electrical Substation 5. Lunch room 6. Toilet 7. Main winch room 8. Watchman cabin2.2 CRAFT PARAMETERS ‘As per Kandla Port fixibility report, alternative has been examined under three option. This includes: 1. Slipway capable of catering to craft having maximum displacement of 450 tonnes 2. Slipway capable of catering to craft having maximum displacement upto 305 tonnes. 3. Slipway capable of catering to craft having displacement upto 140 tonnes. Kandla Port at present a total of 32 port crafts are as follows: Shipping tug - 5 Harbour tug 2 Pilot Launch - 7 ‘Mooring Launch 7s General purpose Launch = 4 Fire float - 1 Survey launch - 1 Heav barge s | Water barge a | Steel dump barge - 1 Motor yatch - 1 Moving boat e 1 32So as the client utility Kandla Port wants to proposed a slipway for 140 t capacity vessel. Details of craft / vessel : Maximum displacement Maximum Length of vessel ‘Maximum beam Maximum draft DIMENSIONS 1. Sloping Cradle Length of sloping cradle 140 24m 72m 2.25 m 18m (As per IS-10020 for slipway, the length of cradle can be shortened by 1/8th m each side). Width = 9m Height = Height = 0.65m+ = 0.65 +18/2 = 215m 0.65 m (at forward end of slipway track) Length of vessel Slope of the slipway2. ‘Transfer Cradle (Similarly to the sloping cradle) Length = 18m Width = 9m Height = 065m 24 SLIPWAY PARAMETER Tidal level at which slipway is designed for taking in craft = +5.60 m Under keel clearange = 05m Floor level at forward end of sloping cradle (B) = +5.6- (Draft + keel clearance + vessel cradle height + sloping cradle height) 5.6 - (2.25 +0.5 + 0.5 + 0.65) +1.7m Floor level at aft. End (A) = +H.7-18/12 = +0.2m Level at after end of slipway track = +02 Level at slipway track = 487m Slope of slipway track = 1ini2 Therefore Length of slipway track = 12x (8.7-0.2) 102M. Width of slipway track 1m 2. Transfer cum Repair bay Length 2 30m Width = 30mCHAPTER 3 ESTIMATION OF FORCES Estimation of forces can be determined by preliminary assumptions of the structural member. For proposed slipway the thickness of slab is consider is 500 mm, pile dia - 900 mm, spacing of the pile in longitudinal direction is 6.0 m e/e and 5.5 cle in transverse direction minimum spacing of the pile is normally. 2.5 times of the pile dia. It can vary with the soil condition but it should not more than 6.0 m. 3.1 PRELIMINARY DESIGN Slab Thickness = 500mm thick Size of Pile cap = 1200x 1200x350 mm Pile dia = 900 mm Spacing of pile - 60mele (Longitudinally) Spacing of pile - 55mele (Transversely) Size ofcolumnabove- = 900x900 mm Thickness ofside wall- - = -300mm Top Beam = 1350x750 mm Total no. of piles - 3.2. FIXITY DEPTH CALCULATION (As per the IS Code 2911 (Part I/see 2) - 1979 Clause - 5.5.2) Fixity depth is depend upon the value of the constant of modulus of horizontal subgrade reaction my or the modulus of subgrade reaction k of the soil from the Table 1 and Table 2 of IS 2911 (Part I/Sec 2) - 1979. As per bore hole details +0 m to -6 m - silty clay, -6 m to -21 m there is silty sand and - 21 mts to -28 m there is silty clay again.Za HERO == Ho ‘S10 2080100200500 : KUka/em) Jength of cantilever giving the same delecticn at ground level as the d= Diameter of the pile ‘Therefore from the Table 2 probable value of k = 7.73 kg/cm? for unconfined compression strength 0.2 to 0.4 kg/em?. From above Fig. From above Fig. As per IS 2911 LD = 8 He | ty) L = 8x900 = 7200mm = 72m After end of the slipway is in water and may affect by scouring. Therefore fixity depth has been consider after 1 m below the souring depth. Fixity depth = Level at pile cap bottom + scouring depth + fixity depth = 0.65 +1.0+72) = 8.85 m33 CALCULATION OF PILE LENGTHS Length of each pile has been carried out for Dead load calculation and for analysis purpose as follows : (Fig. ) Mid ‘Actuallength | Length of Pile| Horiz Slab top level | Pile cut | Of pile from cut} Pile for Row| Distance Level Of slab | Off level |Off level to the f.l| Analysis 7 0 0.25 0.00 -0.60 24.40 8.75 2 6 0.75 | 050_| 0.10 24.50 925 3 12 125} 1.00_| 040 25.40 9.75 4 | _18 175 150 | 0.90 25.90 10.25 3) 24 225 | 2.00 | 1.30 26.40 10.75 6 | 30 275-2350 | 1.70 26.90 11.25 7a to 3.25] 3.00_| 2.10 2740 11.75 Slee) 3.75] 3.50 | 2.50 2790 12.25 9 48 4.25 4.00 2.90 28.40 12.75 0] 54 4.75_| 4350 | 3.30 28.90) 13.25, i] 60 325_| 5.00_| 4.10 29.40 13.75 ze |aaOs 3.75_| 3.50_| 450 29.90 1425 35 | 72 625_| 600 | 4.90 30.40 1475 | 78 675_| 630 | 5.30 30.90, 15.25 is | 84 725_| 7.00 | 5.70 31.40 15.75 16 | 90 7.75_|_730_| 6.10 31.90 16.25 17 | 96 25_| 8.00_| 6.50 32.40 16.75 is] 43 8.65 | 840 | 6.90 32.80 1715 233.90 Total length of piles in one row 233.90 m 4034 DEAD LOAD AND CALCULATION FOR SIDE WALL Thickness of side wall as per preliminary design consideration is 300 mm and weight has been calculated on each pile for analysis purpose and tabulated as below Pile | Bottom [Top Level] Height | Width | Thickness] Weight | Weight of Row | level of | of Wall | of of of of the Wall Wall | Wall | Wall |Conerete| Wallon Each pile T 0 795_| 770 | 255 _| 030 | 25.00 | 147.26 2 [075 | 7.95 | 7.20 | 510 | 030 | 25.00 | 275.40 3 | 125_| 795_| 6.70 | 5.10 | 030 | 25.00 | 256.28 4 [175 _|_795_| 620 | 510 | 030 | 25.00 | 237.15 3_[ 225 | 795 | 5.70 | 510 | 030 | 25.00 | 218.03 6 | 275 | 795 | 520 | 510 | 030 | 25.00 | 198.90 7 [325 |_795_| 470 | 510 | 030 | 25.00 | 179.78 8 | 375 | 795 | 420 | 510 | 030 | 25.00 | 160.65 io | E425) 795 3.70_| 5.10 0:30__| 25.00 | 141.53 10 | 475 7.95 3.20 _| 5.10 0:30__| 25.00 | 122.40 T_| 5.25 735 2.70 _| 5.10 0.30__| 25.00 | 103.28 12 [5.75 735 2.20 | 5.10 030__| 25.00 | 95.62 13_| 625 795 1.70_|_ 5.10 030__| 25.00 | 65.03 14 [675 795 120 | 5.10 0:30__| 25.00 | 45.90 SE | 25) 795 070_| 3.10 0:30__| 25.00 | 26.78 Lor (775) 7.95 020 [5.10 030__[ 25.00 7.65 2281.61 ‘Total load of wall 2281.61 KN From both side of wall 2.x 2281.61 KN = 4563.22 KN it3.5 DEAD LOAD CALCULATION (For Column and Beam) ‘Weight of column and beam (walkway beam) has been calculated and tabulated for analysis purpose. Pile | Sizeof |Height of| Weight of| Size of Beams Weight of Row | Column | Column | Colamn | (Walkway Beam) TP OseOS [TTD | 15553 | 07S x5.0xIIS_| SL ZT OFx0T 720 | 14580 |0.75x6.00x135_| 151.88 3 OIxOT [670 | 135.68 | 0.75 x600x135_| 151.88 FP OFKOT [620] 19555 | 0.75 x 600x135 | 151.88 ST O9KOT [510] 115.a3_| 0.75 x6.00x135_| 151.88 S[09xOT] 320 | 105.30 | 0.75 x 600x135 151.88 FT O9KOT | 4I0 | 95.18 | 0.75 x6.00x135 | 151.88 FP OIKOT [420] 85.05 [0.75 x 600x135 | 151.88 I OIxOT | 310 | 7493 | 0.75 x 600x135 | 151.88 10 [09x09 [320 | 64.80 [0.75 x 600x135 | 151.88 Tr 09x09 [270 | 54.68 | 0.75 x6.00x135_| 151.88 TL OFx0T [220 | 44.55 | 0.75 x 600x135 | 151.88 13 09x09 170 | 34.43 [0.75 x 6.00135 | 151.88 1} 09x09 [120 | 2430 | 0.75 x 600x135 | 151.88 15 0.9x0.9 0.70 14.18 0.75 x 6.00 x 1.35 151.88 TS [09xOT [020] 4.05 [0.75 x 600x135 | 151.88 17 151.88 18 ‘91.13 1299.28 2612.25 Column Weight Total weight of our side column is = 1299.28 KN Therefore weight of both side column is = 2x 1299.28 KN = 2598.56KN Say = 2598KN Walkway Beam Total weight of one side beam is = 261525KN ‘Therefore weight of both side is = 2x2612.25KN Ls 5224.68 KN Say = 5224KN y3.6 DEAD LOAD CALCULATION OF PILES Dia of piles = 900mm, Total height of pile = 233.90 (length as per clause 3.3) up to fixity level. No of piles in each row = 3 Total weight of piles = wld * 0,9" 233,90*3#25 = 11,160 KN 3.7 DEAD LOAD CALCULATION OF PILE CAP Dimension of pile cap is as per preliminary design Size of pile cap = 1200.x 1200x 350 mm Similar A" ABC & DCE (by similarity of Triangles) (Fig. 7) 0.6/24x = — 0.95/x 0.60 Volume of frustum portion = 13 1.2x(0.240.6) - 1/3 x 0.45 x 0.6 = 034m* Total volume of one pile cape = (1.2.x 1.2x0.15) +034 = 0.56 m* No of piles = 3x 180 = 54.00 Total weight of the pile caps = 54x056x25 = 756.0KN 4338 39 3.9.1 DEAD LOAD CALCULATION OF SLAB Dimensions are as per preliminary designs Slab = 500mm thick Length 102m Width 12.20 m Weight = 102x12.2x0.5x25 = 15,555 KN LOADS FOR DESIGN PURPOSE Dead Load a) Pile load length up to fixity depth) = 11,160 KN (as per Clause 3.6) b) Pile caps (as per Clause 3.7) - 756 KN ©) Slab (as per Clause 3.8) = 15,555KN 4 Column weight = 2,598KN (as per Clause 3.5) ©) Top beam = 5,225KN (as per Clause 3.5) £) Side wall (as per Clause 3.4) = 4563KN 2) Cradle weight +Rail ete (1400 KN @ 40%) = 560 KN 443.9.2 Live Load Only vessel load has been consider on the slipway as a live load and 10 KN/m? load on the walkway is considered as per IS-4651. Vessel load = 1400KN Live load of 10 KN/m? on top walkway beam (as per IS 4651) = 2754KN 3.9.3 Wheel load As the whole load of the vessel will be transfer to slab through wheels of cradle so that. Total load of vessel and cradle load (i.e. 40% of cradle load) has been calculated as follows : Vessel load - 1400.00KN- cradle load - (40% of vessel load) - 560. 1960.00 KN No of wheel ina cradle = 20x4 = 80 Wheels Joad on each wheel = 1960/80 = 24.50KN 153.10 SEISMIC FORCE The horizontal force caused by earthquakes called seismic force can be calculated using the seismic coefficient method given in IS-1893 - 1984. The horizontal seismic force F is given by Freon Wm oy = Design horizontal seismic coefficient Wn = Weight of mass under consideration is equal to the dead load plus one half of the line load. Total dead load = 49417-KN Total live load 4,154 KN As per IS 1893 - 1984 Load Wn = DL+1/2LL Seismic Force Fe = dy (DL+1/2LL) The design value of horizontal seismic coefficient, in the seismic coefficient ‘method shall be computer as given by the following express. op, = BXIX Coefficient depends upon the soil foundation system B = _—_1.0 (from table - 3) (x5- 1893) ‘A factor depending upon the importance of the structure. I = 1.5 (from table - 4) (43-1892) 16Basic horizontal coefficient based on the zone a = 0.08 (for zone V) om = 012 = 0,12 (40,4174 4154/2) = 5099.28 KN Force on each pile = 5099.28/54 = 94.43 KN 94.50 KN ‘Total horizontal force SayCHAPTER 4 ANALYSIS OF STRUCTURE 41 ANAL’ meek the structure is carried out using STADD Ill. The structure is idealized as a 2-D frame, The slab in piles are idealized by beam elements. The discrilization of the from is shown in Fig - Load has been transfer by the wheel so that post toad has been consider, And the load of walls also transferred as a post loaded onthe pile. 42 DEADLOAD Details of loads on frame. 42.1 Gradel load = 0,560KN Load on each need = 560/80=7KN ‘No. of wheels on ne day = 6 ‘Total load of 6 wheels = 6x7 = 42KN 4.1.2. Joint Load (Dead load) = add of wall + load of column + load of Bean = 256.28 + 135.68 + 15.88 = 543.84KN Say 544 KN on Joint. 43 Live load (Vessel load) : Maximum displacement = 1400KN No. of wheels inacradle = 80 Nos. Load on each cradle = 1400/80 = 175KN No. of wheels in abay = 6 Nos Total load of 6wheels = 6x 17.5 KN = 105 KNwarnneene 10. STAAD PLANE OF SLIP WAY AT KANDLA PORT INPUT WIDTH 72 OUTPUT WIDTH 72 UNITS METER KNS JOINT COORDINATES 0 0 5.5 0 11 o 0 9.75 5.5 9.75 il 9.75 EMBER INCIDENCE 7 4 anus ER PROPERTIES 5 PRI YD 0.9 4 PRI ZD 3.0 YD 0.5 CONSTANTS E 3.122787 ALL DENSITY 25 ALL 2 5 3 BI 3 RH ZOBUNE ZOU RENE SUPPORT 1.2 3 FIXED LOAD 1 DEAD LOAD SELF ¥ -1 MEMBER LOAD 2 CON GY -42 2.75 2 CON Gy -42 5.00 4 CON GY -42 0.5 4 CON Gy -42 2.75 JOINT LOAD 4 FY -544 6 FY -544 LOAD 2 LIVE LOAD MEMBER LOAD 2 CON GY -105 2.75 2 CON GY -105 5.00 4 CON GY -105 0.50 4 CON GY -105 2.75 19 PAGE NO. 142. LOAD 3 SEISMIC FORCE 43. JOINT LOAD 44.4 EX 94.50 45.5 FX 94.50 46. 6 FX 94.50 47. LOAD COMB 4 (1.0*DL+1. OF SLIP WAY AT KANDLA PORT eee ae 49. LOAD COMB 5 (1.5*DL+1. 508 edo en do LOAD COMB 6 (1.2*DL+1. 52.1 1.2 2 1.2.3 1.5 53. LOAD COMB 7 (0.9*DL+0. 54.1 0.9 2 0.9 3 1.5 55. PERFORM ANALYSIS + ++ 51 56 ( TRANSVERSE ) O*LL) 5*LL) 2*LL+1.5*SF) 9*LL+1.5*SF) TATISTIcs NUMBER OF JOINTS/MEMBER+ELEMENTS/SUPPORTS = ORIGINAL/FINAL BAND-WIDTH TOTAL PRIMARY LOAD CASES = SIZE OF STIFFNESS MATRIX REQRD/AVAIL. DISK SPACE af 2 -- PAGE NO. c/o 3, TOTAL DEGREES OF FREEDOM = 9 54 DOUBLE PREC. WORDS 12.01/ 2006.9 MB, processing Element stiffness Matrix. processing Global Stiffness Matrix. processing Triangular Factorization calculating Joint Displacements. Calculating Member PRINT ANALYSIS RESULT Forces. 20 EXMEM = 1964.0 MB 14:3) 14:OF SLIP WAY AT KANDLA PORT -- PAGE NO. JOINT DISPLACEMENT (CM RADIANS) STRUCTURE TYPE = PLANE OINT LOAD X-TRANS Y-TRANS Z-TRANS X-ROTAN Y-ROTAN —Z-ROTAN 1 1 -0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 =0000 2 +0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 =0000 3 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 4 0000 +0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 5 =0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 6 0000 -0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 7 0000 0000 0000 +0000 0000 0000 2 1 0000 0000 0000 +0000 0000 +0000 2 9000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 3 0000 0000 0000 +0000 0000 0000 4 -0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 5 +0000 +0000 0000 0000 0000 +0000 6 0000 =0000 +0000 ooo 0000 +0000 7 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 20000 3 1 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 +0000 2 0000 0000 0000 =0000 +0000 0000 3 0000 0000 =0000 0000 0000 0000 4 +0000 0000 =0000 =0000 0000 0000 5 +0000 0000 0000 :0000 0000 0000 6 +0000 +0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 7 0000 0000 0000 0000 =0000 0000 4 1 10001 =~ .0354 0000 0000 20000 ~. 0001. 2 0001 0023 0000 0000 20000 = -. 0002. 3 +9150 0057 0000 0000 10000 © = .0005 4 -0001 0377 0000 0000 20000 = = .0002 5 0002 0565 =0000 0000 20000 = .0003 6 1.3727 0367 =0000 0000 70000 -.0009 7 1.3726 0254 0000 0000 10000 ~.0009 5 1 10000 = -.0226 0000 0000 +0000 0000 2 10000 © -.0160 0000 =0000 0000 0000 3 9149 0000 0000 0000 50000-0001. 4 10000 =~ .0386 0000 +0000 0000 0000 5 10000 © ~.0579 0000 0000 0000 0000 6 1.3724 = .0463 +0000 0000 50000 © - 0002 7 1.3724 0 -.0347 +0000 0000 10000 - .0002 6 1 ~.0001 = .0354 0000 0000 0000 0001 2 -.0001 = .0023 0000 0000 0000 0001 3 9150 -.0057 0000 0000 10000 = -.0005 4 -10001 = -.0377 0000 0000 0000 +0002 5 -.0002 = - 0565 0000 :0000 +0000 0003 6 1.3723 ~.0537 20000 +0000 0000 = -.0005 7 1.3724 «0424 0000 0000 10000 =. 0006 2OF SLIP WAY AT KANDLA PORT SUPPORT REACTIONS -UNIT KNS METE “ JOINT LOAD Ft 1 2 3 4 5 6 A 2 1 2 5 4 5 6 7 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 FORCE-X 5.69 5.79 “87.47 11.48 17.22 -117.42 -120.87 200 +00 -108.57 00 -00 162.85 -162.85 -5.69 5.79 -87.47 11.48 -17.22 -144.97 -141.53 FORCE-Y 798.02 46.82 115.26 844.84 1267.26 840.92 587.47 537.66 326.35 200 864.01 1296.02 1036.82 TIT. 61 798.02 46.82 115.26 844.84 1267.26 1186.70 933.25 STRUCTURE TYPE FORCE-Z 22 00 200 +00 +00 +00 200 200 +00 200 :00 +00 00 00 00 00 00 200 200 200 200 +00 MOM-X 00 200 200 00 00 +00 -00 00 200 90 200 200 00 +00 +00 00 00 :00 -00 00 +00 = PLANE MOM-Y 00 200 00 00 +00 200 200 200 +00 200 200 00 -00 00 00 00 200 200 200 200 +00 -- PAGE NO MOM Z 18.35 18.69 476.05 -37.04 -55.56 669.63 680.74 00 200 544.18 +00 +00 816.27 816.27 18.35 18.69 476.05 37.04 55.56 758.52 747.41OF SLIP WAY AT KANDLA PORT -- PAGE NO. 5 MEMBER END FORCES = STRUCTURE TYPE = PLANE _ ALL UNITS ARE -- KNS METE MEMBER LOAD JT AXIAL SHEAR-Y SHEAR-% TORSION MOM-Y MOM-Z ta 1 798.02 -5.69 00 00 00 18.35 4 © -642.95 5.69 00 200 +00 -37.10 2 a 46.82 -5.79 = 00 =00 :00 -18.69 4 46.82 5.79 00 +00 200 -37.78 3 1 -115.26 87.47 00 +00 200 476.05 4 115.26 -87.47 00 200 +00 376.74 4 1 844.847 -11.48 00 00 :00 -37.04- 4 -689.78 11.48 200 200 +00 74.88 5 1 1267.26 17.22 +00 200 00 55.56 4 -1034.66 17.22 200 00 100 -212.32 6 1 840.92 117.42 +00 00 00 669.63 4 -654.84 © -117.42 +00 -00 00 475.25 7 1 «587.47 120.87 00 00 00 680.74 4 447.91 -120.87 +00 00 00 497.72 2 2 4 5.69 98.95 00 -00 00 37.10 5 -5.69 191.30 200 200 100 -196.55 2 4 5.79 46.82 =00 200 -00 37.78 5 -5.79 163.18 00 200 Too -122.49 3 4 7.03 -115.26 00 200 00 «= -376.74 5 -7.03 115.26 200 +00 1090 -257-19 4 4 11.48 145.78 +00 00 200 74.88 5 -11.48 354.47 00 +00 100 -318.04 5 4 17.22 218.66 +00 -00 200 112.31 5-17.22 531.72 00 +00 100 -477.07 6 4 24.33 2.04 +00 +00 1000 -475.25 5 24.33 598.26 00 £00 100 -767.43 7 4 20.88 = -41.69 00 +00 1000 -497.72 5 -20.88 491.91 00 200 100 -672.02 3002 2 537.66 -00 -00 00 00 -00 5 -382.60 00 100 00 00 +00 2 326-35 00 +00 00 00 00 5 326.35 00 200 200 00 200 3 2 100 108.57 +00 +00 00 544.18 5 00 © -108.57 :00 =00 00 514.37 4 2 864.01 200 +00 00 -00 00 5 -708.95 , +00 00 =00 200 +00 5 2 1296.02 00 00 00 200 200 5 -1063.42 / .00 -00 00 00 200 6 2 1036.82% 162.85 -00 00 =00 816.27 5 -850.74 -162.85 200 200 00 * (771-56 7 2 777.61 162.85 200 00 00 816.27 5 -638.05 -162.85 +00 +00 00 771.56 23OF SLIP WAY AT KANDLA PORT - MEMBER END FORCES = STRUCTURE TYPE ALL UNITS ARE -- KNS METE MEMBER LOAD JT AXIAL SHEAR-Y 4 21 5 5.69 191.30 6 -5.69 98.95 2 5 5.79 163.18 6 “5.79 46.82 3 5 -7.04 ° -115.26 6 7.04 115.26 4 5 11.48 © 354.47 6 -11.48 145.78 5 5 17.22, 531.71 6 -17.22 218.66 6 5 3.22 252.48 6 -3.22 347.82 7 5 1220 «146.14 6 222 304.09 ct 3 798.02 5.69 6 -642.95 “5.69 2 3 46.82 5.79 . 6 46.82 -5.79 3 3 (115.26 87.47 6 -115.26 = -87.47 4 3 844.84 11.48 6 -689.78 -11.48 5 3 1267.26 17.22 6 -1034.66 = -17.22 6 3 1186.70 144.97 6 -1000.62 -144.97 7 Be oas¢2s) aie?) 6 -793.69 -141.53 PLANE SHEAR-Z 00 200 200 +00 +00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 200 200 :00 +00 +00 +00 +00 00 00 00 00 00 TORSION 00 00 00 -00 00 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 +00 00 +00 200 200 +00 200 +00 =00 +00 200 200 00 00 00 -- PAGE NO. 6 MOM-¥ 00 +00 +00 200 00 200 200 200 200 200 200 +00 00 -00 00 00 200 200 200 00 00 00 00 +00 +00 200 200 200 AweweeeeeeEE#e END OF LATEST ANALYSIS RESULT **#ke i xe RRHHR 7. FINISH Joooceeesetieete END OF STAAD-IIT stidniersssssci a4 MoM-2Z, 196.55 37.10 121.49 37.78 -257.19 376.74 318.04 74.88 477.07 112.31 4.13 -654.96 99.54 632.49 18.35 37.10 18.69 37.78 476.05 376.74 37.04 74.88 55.56 112.31 758.52 654.96 747.41 632.49sect ‘yi Ava raiva Tubs yigwyy iv ava give do #aquTL (gerzz taaH) LOAd-LS06 GQvV¥is Sw Ta TENT vst orks A iuatananas wana/Na enn zr tv- ay- uv SEW" Ser aNVIe = BEAL viva aunionuis. 25= dude vagNvs IV AVR dI7S 40 PS0LTE S61 ‘ri AVN t3ivO (oe*zz NOTSUBN) LOTd- Fue OYVYIS wy-Se TNT e5 | KYHA Bi xv. | i sof mN anya = 3dAL | viyo sunionuss ssai- +s04-"spi- *soi- wana/ni z saver 265.1 CHAPTER 5 DESIGN OF STRUCTURAL MEMBER PILE ‘Maximum moment and shear force results are obtain through STAAD III analysis, and design of structural member are carried out as per SP-16 design aid to IS 456. Maximum Moment & Shear Force Moment Factored | factored a an Case Description axial force | moment Load case Pu (kN) KN.m For maximum axial foree 1 1296.0 0.0 365) corresponding moment ‘Maximum moment and 2 1036.82 816 36) corresponding axial force Design of pile (Case 2) Grade of concrete M30 Grade of steel Fe als Dia of pile D 900 mm Length of pile 17.15 m (upto fixity level) Leg/D =1 Therefore design as slender member From SP 16 Table I Moment due to slenderness Le/D =19 Puxe 30 .15/.9 =19 > 12 eD 0.181 0.16 Factored axial Force x eccentricity 1036.82 x 0.16 165.89Total moment MyFactored Moment + Moment due to slendemess bal 816 + 165.89 = 981.89 Say = 982KN Providing a clear cover of 75 mm and using Y32 bars (15+32/2) 900 #103 - Soon 2 = 98210 _po4 30* 9008 From SP 16 chart 56 Pf = 0.03 P = 0.03430 = 09) Area of Steel- Ast = 2.9% *9007 100*4 = 5725.56 mm? Provide 8Y 32 mm (6434mm’) Rings Y 10 mm @ 300 mm cle 3h5.1.1 LOAD CARRYING CAPACITY OF PILE: Ultimate bearing capacity of pile has been carried out as per IS - 2911 (Part I/Sec 2) - 1979, Clause - 5.3.1.1 PILES IN GRANULAR SOILS: The ultimate bearing capacity (Qa) of piles in granular soil is given by the following formula : a Qu=Ap (1/2 DyNr+PaNg)+ © K Pa tand Asi where sross - sectional area of pile toe in cm’; m diameter in cm; effective unit weight of soil at pile toe in kgffem’; Pp= effective overburden pressure at pile toe in keffem”; ‘Neand Ng = bearing capacity factors depending upon the angle of internal friction 6 at toe SL, = summation for n layers in which pile is installed; K~ smeficient of eats presroe; = effective overburden pressure in kg/em? for the i layer where I varies from 1 tom; 8 = angle of wall friction between pile and soil, in degrees (may be taken equal to 6 ); and ‘Agi = surface area of pile stem in cm? in the i layer where I varies from lton PILES IN COHESIVE SOIL : The ultimate bearing capacity (Q,) of piles in cohesive soil is given by the following formula : Qu=ApNeCp+ a As where ‘Ay = cross sectional area of pile toe in em’, N= bearing capacity factor usually taken as 9, wverage cohesion at pile tip in kg/em’, a. = reduction factor, Chane cohesion throughout the length of pile in kg/em?, and = surface area of pile shaft in cm? Soil Profile as per bore log 0.0mto-6.0m Grey silly clay -6.0mto-21.0m — Sillysand M=! C=25 KN/m -21.0 mto-28.0m Stiff Brown clay C=100 KN/m? Founding level of pile -25.0m Cut-off level of pile -0.65 m Total length of the pile 24.35 m Skin Friction Resistance (Qs) 3hIst layer From -0.6 m to -6.0 m - Cohesive soil NPT=2 C=25 KNim” a= 0.7 Qa =a As =0.7x25x0x0.9x5.35 = 264.77 KN. 1 layer From -6.0 m to 21.0 m Granular soil) Tsay = 19 KN/tm? - 10 kN/m? =9KN/mn™ 9= 28° K=2 Qe =K Ppp tan 8 Asi =2x 9x (5.35 + 15/2) x tan 28°x x 0.9 x 15 = 5215.95 kN rd layer From -21 to -25 m (Cohesive soil) N=9 a=05 C= 100 KN/im? Qs = OC As =05x100xx09x4 = 565.50 KN Total skin friction = Qr3 + Qra + Qrs 164 + 5215.95 + 565.50 045.45 Say = 6045 KN END BEARING CAPACITY N=9 C=100kN/m* Q = ApNeCp = wl4x 0.9 x 9x 100 = $72.55 Say = S72KN Total ultimate capacity = 6045 +572 = 6617 kN 1617/25 1646.8 KN > 1246 kN (Axial Forces) Safe Bearing capacity Hence - Safe 335.2 DESIGN OF SIDE WALL Consider a height of earth pressure outside of the wall is 2.5 m because of siltation. Height of panel = = 2.50 angle of repose =30° Co-efficient of earth pressure (K,) = 1-sing / 1+sing = 0.333 Pressure =KyyH + yoHl where K, = Co-efficient of earth pressure y = submerged weight of soil ‘Yu = unit weight of water Earth pressure = 0.333 x9 x 2.5+10x2.5 =7.49 +25 = 32.49 Um? <. BM at Bottom of wall - (consider a meter strip) 32.49 x 6.07/12 7.47 KNem, ‘Support moment w9?/I uo Effective depth calculations (Moment of Resistance) MR = 0,138 x fok x bx d 1.5x97.47x 10 = 0.138x 30x 1000xd* 4 = 187.79 Overall depth 87.92 +6 +40 33.92 mm Provided depth 50 mm Mba? = 1.5 x 97.47 x 108 / 1000 x 204 =3.51 n/m? From SP - 16 PR = 1.156% As 156/100 x 1000 x 204 358.24 mm? 3.58 cm? Provide 7 16mm @ 90 mm c/c upto 2.5 m From bottom. In remaining portion = 0.2% of cross - section area of side wall 0.2/100 x 1000 x 204 408 mm Provide y 12 mm @ 200 c/e (5.65 cm?) 345.3 DESIGN OF SLAB Slab is designed by 1. By influence line method 2. By considering sue load 1. By influence line method Position of loads over a span for maximum bending moment, Each wheelload = = 24.5 KN due to impact = 112x245 = 29.40 KN ‘Absolute max. B.M. position x=29.5x 1.2-429.5 x2.4-+29.5 x 3.6 + 29.5 x48 +29.5 x 6 / (29.5 x6) x=3mFromend-A CG of load and slab is same as panel CG Now considering the 5 wheels on the panel. So that centre load act @ distance of =5 3-1/2. G-2.4) = 2.7 m from A and it gives maximum moment 36Max. B.M. due to point load (ordinate x load) = (29.5 x 0.165) + (29.5 x 0,825) + (29.5 x 1.485) + (29.5 x 0.945) + (29.5 x 0.405) = 112.8375 kN/m. Max. BM. due to UDL load (self wt.) (area of diagram x UDL) = 1/2 (040.165) x 1.2 x 12.5 + 1/2 (0.165+0.325) x 1.2.x 12.5 + 1/2 (0.825+1.485) x 12x 12.5 + 1/2 (1.485 + 0.945) x 1.2 x 12.5 + 1/2 (0.945 + 0.405) x 1.2.x 12.5 + 1/2 x (0.405 +0) x 1.2.x 12.5 =5737KNam Total BM 112.8375 + $7.37 = 170.20 kN-m Effective depth 0.138 x fx x bd MR = 15%170.20x10° = (0.138 x 30x 1000 x d* d = 248.32 mm Overall depth = 248.32 +10 +40 = 298.32 Provided = 300mm Mu/bd? = 170.20x 10°/ 1000 x 454? = 0.82 N/mm2 ‘As per SP 16 Py = 0.83% An 0,244/100 x 1000 x 454 1107.76 mm or = 11.07¢m? Provide y 16 mm @ 180 c/e (11.17 em?) 2; DESIGN OF SLAB WITH SUE LOAD ‘A concentrated load called sue load is induced on the cradle and the tracks at inboard and outboard ends of the cradle while hauling only. 36‘As the cradle along with the vessel is hauled, the magnitude of the load increased from the point of the first contact of the vessel with the cradle and becomes ‘maximum just before the ‘vessel is about to loose all its buoyancy and sue load normally varies from 1/3 to 1/8 of the tight displacement of the vessel depending on the shape and size, CALCULATION OF SUE LOAD gue load = 1/3 x total weight of vessel (including cradle weight) ‘Vessel weight + cradle weigh = 1400 + 560 = 1960 KN. Max. Sue load = 1/3 x 1960 = 653.33 KN This load will act at front wheel only. = Load acts on each wheel = 653.33/4 = 163.33 KN a7TT Rax5.5 = 12.5 x 5.57/2 + 163.33 x 2.75 + 163.33 x 0.5 Rax5.5 19.88 Ra = 130.88 KN Re = 264.53 Max. B.M. at centre = 130,88 x 2.75 - 12.5 x 2.75772 = 359.92 - 47.26 = 312.66 kN-m Say = 312.70 KN-m MR. = 0.138 x fx bx 1.5 x 312.70 x 108 138 x 30 x 1000 x a 36 Overall depth =336+8 +40 = 384mm. Say = 400mm Mu/bd? = 1.5 x 312.70 x 10° / 1000 x 384” = 3.18 N/imm? As per SP 16 036 ‘Area ofthe steel = 1.036/100 x 1000 x 384 = 3978 mm? Provide y 25 mm bars @ 150 cle5.4 DESIGN OF TOP (WALKWAY) BEAM: Concrete = M30, Fe=415 Grade Span = 60mee Dead Load ee ee = 25.31 KN/m Live Load 1OKN/m?x135= 1350KN/m 3881KN/m 2 BM = SRE 11643KN/m (at support) BM 2 (at centre) 3881x6" _5821KN/m 24 MR = 0.138 x 30x 1350.x d From maximum moment d = 144mm “Mu _ 15x58.21x1000x1000 _ 9.97 mm? <0.3 Nimm? bd? 900x692? Minimum Reinforcement As = 0.85 bd/fy 0.85 x 7350 x 692/415 1913.42 mm? 5 Y 16 mmat Top 5 Y 16 mm at Bottom Provide Shear Reinforcement Rings - 4 legged Y 10mm @ 250 mm c/e 29CHAPTER 6 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS The design of a slipway to facilitate the small craft repairing in the port. The slipway is designed for the 140 t maximum displacement and live load of 10 KN/m” on the walkway. ‘The length of the slipway is 102 m and width is 12.20 m. The slipway facilitating provided with transfer bay/repair bay of 30m x 30m including. The analysis of a typical pile bent is carried out using STAAD Il and design is carried out using Limit State Design. ‘The size of the slab is 400mm thick, Pile dia is 900mm, side wall thickness is found 300mm and walkway beam size is 750mm x 1350mm. ‘The main reinforcement in pile 8 Y 32mm dia bars. For slab Y 25mm dia bars @150mm in both the directions. For beam 5 Y 16mm dia and stirrups of 4 legged - Y10mm @200 e/c. In wall main reinforcement - Y16mm @90mm c/c from bottom & remaining portion — ¥ 12mm @ 200 c/e 4oae pantuday)6 207 2 (005:1-81225 a OT ONV¥/S307i11 ‘on 94a ; AWMdTIS JO INAWSONVEEV TVESN3S F313 | re ooaeel ——oo%er — ; 3 iP aw ¢ adors 8 L a eee | | | | | il 20 sl e 8 | ee syErAwaatig— Vi wove AWMdI: i | sone > SygvwS THES WORT NOT ae rout- havo wasnvat| NOLWASTS WHOSE ONt= 310¥u) ONIdOTS weve) wB2snvaL, ~T3SS3A 7(@ BORE HOLE FIG No.2 KEY PLAN LEGEND oe WAY SLIP1 DEPTH DESCRIPTION N csKN/nt 0.0m | SILTY GREY cLay a ae | SILTY SAND 8 2 | a SILTY GREY 8 100 cuay i i 228 L Fig.No.3. SOIL PROFILE OF BORE HOLE taAVAdITS 40 NVId-wes . INGGAON ee aTdvad wor sive = ANd PIG 006 a4SWiall1S AO INTRON TWYINID [a YW) MUFENTONE_NYGVO eee _| Se TIRE ggg ne nn ive Basal) NOUWAR'a WROWOaS asCROSS SECTION FIGNo 6 BOLLARD — RAIL | | 2 900x900 FEND VESSEL CRADLE SLOPING CRADLE 5500 i PILEMUFF tte 1200x‘200x35 ae 1 ne ¢ 22k Lh T | | | 1 i 300 OF SLIPWAYF-12024, 500 Thick sta FIXITY ~ 6.85 9006 PLE =——+| |75mm CLEAR COVER — ¥10 a 300 cic 8.32 PLAN ] te Ff} v10 «300 ere tte je ee Se Eee | :_ \-4+-— [300 Fig. No.8. SECTIONAL ELEVATION _REINFORCEMENT PILE 4BBe, sone Rta) Caev0@ 200cre 700 [FY 16 @ s0cre | UP TO 2500 FROM 307 TOM | {i | AND REMAINING PORTION- 00, —— ¥25 @150e/c _7250 ¥12 @200 cic ALL DIMENSIONS ARE IN mm. Fig.No.9. TYPICAL SECTIONS REINFORCEMENT DETAILS OFREFERENCES 1. 18 10020 (part - IV) 1981 - Code of practice for Design and construction of Port and Harbour components - Part IV Slip way 2, 18.456 - 1978 - Code of practice for plain and reinforced concrete | 18 4651 - Code of practice for planning and design of ports and design of ports and harbours SP - 16 - 1980 - design aid to IS - 456 - 1978 4, 18-2911 - (Part 1/See 4) - 1984 Code of practice for Design and Construction of pile foundation 5, IS - 1893 - 1980 - Code of practice for Earthquake so