TEAM

9TH INSTITUTE OF LAW NATIONAL MOOT COURT COMPETITION CODE-IL-05

2019
MEMO ON BEHALF OF INFORMANT

9TH INSTITUTE OF LAW NIRMA UNIVERSITY NATIONAL MOOT

COURT COMPETITION, 2019

BEFORE

Kantian Competition Commission (KCC)

UNDER SECTION 26 (5) OF THE COMPETITION ACT, 2002

COMPETITION CASE NO. 17/2018

BEAUTY WATCH ……………………………………………………..INFORMANT

versus
BEAUTRIXLESTRANGE..............................................................OPPOSITE PARTY

Clubbed with

COMPETITION CASE NO. 5/2018

BEAUTRIX LESTRANGE…………………………………INFORMANT

Versus

GOLDEN SPAS……………………………………………OPPOSITE PARTY

-WRITTEN SUBMISSIONS ON BEHALF OF THE INFORMANT-

Page | i
 9TH INSTITUTE OF LAW NATIONAL MOOT COURT COMPETITION 2019
MEMO ON BEHALF OF INFORMANT

PRAYER

Wherefore in the light of Issues raised, arguments advanced and authorities cited, the
counsel on behalf of the Informant, most humbly pray before this Hon’ble Commission
to be pleased to adjudge and declare that:

• The change of terms by BL amounts to abuse of dominant position under Section

4(2)(a).

• There are structural or strategic barriers created by BL in the relevant market.

• BL has leveraged his dominant position in one relevant market to enter into
another relevant market.

• The Agreement Entered Into by Golden Pass with Foreign Brands is Anti-
Competitive and violative of Section 3 of The Act.

• “Gold Pass” as an Agreement Between Golden Spas Violates Section 3 of The

Act.

And to pass any order or relief in favor of the Informant which this Commission
may deem fit in the interest of Justice, Equity and Good Conscience.

All of which is most humbly and respectfully submitted.

Counsel on behalf of Informant

Sd/-

Page | 17