Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Coimbatore City
Mrs. G. Poornima,
Asst. Professor, Department of Management Studies
Coimbatore
Abstract
Mahindra & Mahindra Financial Services Limited (M&MFSL) is a subsidiary of Mahindra
and Mahindra Limited, one of India’s leading tractor and utility vehicle manufacturers.
M&MFSL is one of India’s leading non-banking finance companies focused in the rural and
semi-urban sector. It is primarily in the business of financing purchase of new and pre-owned
auto and utility vehicles, tractors, cars and commercial vehicles. The company has 559 offices
covering 24 states and 4 union territories in India, with over 1.6 million vehicle finance customer
contracts since inception, as of June 30, 2011. M&M Financial Services Ltd has two
subsidiaries Mahindra & Mahindra Rural Housing Finance (MRHFL) and Mahindra Insurance
Brokers Ltd (MIBL).
INTRODUCTION
A business with high service quality will meet or exceed customer expectations whilst
remaining economically competitive. Evidence from empirical studies suggests that improved
service quality increases profitability and long term economic competitiveness. Improvements to
service quality may achieved by improving operational processes; identifying problems quickly
and systematically; establishing valid and reliable service performance measures and measuring
customer satisfaction and other performance outcomes.
From the viewpoint of business administration, service quality is an achievement in
customer service. It reflects at each service encounter. Customers form service expectations from
past experiences, word of mouth and marketing communications. In general, customers compare
perceived service with expected service, and which if the former falls short of the latter the
customers are disappointed.
The parentage of the awe-inspiring Mahindra & Mahindra Group and the close
association with dealers through out the country gives company an additional and exclusive
advantage. The company’s financial solutions include Vehicle Financing, Refinancing, Housing
Finance, Personal Loans, Fixed Deposits, Insurance Broking and Mutual Fund Distribution.
CRISIL has assigned AA+/Stable, FITCH has assigned AA (ind) / Positive and Brickwork has
assigned AA+/ Positive rating to the Company’s long term and subordinated debt.
REVIEW OF LITERATURE
Review of literature is essential for every researcher to carry on investigation successfully. Review
of literature will expose the researcher to previous researches conducted. This would help him to
decide upon the area not studied upon and that which his study should concentrate on.
The literature of previous studies will inform the researcher of the study and thereby the
researcher can take adequate measures to overcome them. It is a text of a scholarly paper. Which
includes the current knowledge including substantive findings as well as theoretical and
methodological contribution to a particular topic? It use secondary sources and do not report new
or experimental work.
A number of researchers have been covered the topic of service quality. All the
researchers find different result from their study.
Preethi (2000): Conducted an exploratory study to develop a service quality model. The
overall discussions of service quality revealed that it is more difficult for the customer to evaluate
service quality, service quality perceptions result from a comparison of consumer expectations
with actual service performance and evaluation of quality is made on the outcome of a service as
well as the process of service.
Minjoon Jun nadShaohanCai (2001): In their research identified 17 dimensions of
internet banking service quality which are classified into three categories namely customer service
quality, banking service product quality and online systems quality. The results revealed that
reliability, responsiveness, access and accuracy were found to have impact on customer
satisfaction.
Gani A and Mushtaq A. Bhat (2003): Carried out a study to analyze the service quality
in Indian and foreign banks. The results of the study revealed that quality of service in foreign
banks are comparatively better than that of Indian banks and pointed out that Indian banks are
lagging behind on the front of physical facilities, up-to-date equipments, communication material,
neatness of employees, employees providing prompt service to customers,willingness of
employees to help customers, convenient operating hours, banks having customers’ interests at
heart and employees who give personal attention.
The study is confined to Coimbatore city and therefore findings may not be related to
other areas.
Time constraint was a major limitation.
The sample size is restricted to 100 respondents only.
All the findings and suggestion is given totally based on the information collected
through questionnaire.
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
Male 68 68
Female 32 32
20-30 34 34
30-40 26 26
40-50 29 29
50 & above 11 11
The above table reveals that maximum 34% of the respondents are falling in the age group
between 20-30 years , 29% of the respondents are between 40-50 years and the least of 11% of
them are 50 & above years.
Married 64 64
Unmarried 36 36
The above table shows that 64 % respondents are married and 36 % of respondents are
unmarried.
No formal education 18 18
School level 30 30
Ug 34 34
Pg & above 19 19
The above table explicit that, Out of 100 respondents 34% are completed under graduate,
30% are under school level, 19% of the respondents are under pg and above and the remaining
18% are under no formal education.
TABLE 4.5
Private employment 27 27
Govt employment 24 24
Business men 28 28
Profession 21 21
From the above table it is clear that maximum 28% of the respondents are business men ,
27% of the respondents are private employees,24% respondents are govt employees and the
remaining 21% of the respondents are professionals.
OCCUPATION OF THE RESPONDENTS
No. of Respondents
120
100
80
60
40
No. of Respondents
20
0
Private Govt Business men Profession Total
employment employment
OCCUPATION
Below 6000 17 17
6001-8000 25 25
8001-10000 31 31
10001-above 27 27
The above table indicate that, majority 31% of the respondents are getting monthly salary
between 8001-10000, 27% of the respondents are getting 10001-above and 17% of them are
getting below 6000
No. of Respondents
100
0
No. of Respondents
INCOME
2-4 39 39
4-6 40 40
6-8 13 13
8 & above 8 8
The above table indicates that majority 40% of the respondents have 4-6 members and 39%
of the respondents comes under between 2 and 4, 13% respondents comes under between 6 and 8,
and the remaining 8% of the respondents are 8 & above.
PRODUCT PREFERENCE
Bolero 21 21
Scorpio 24 24
Kuv 100 31 31
Thar 24 24
From the above table 31% of the respondents prefer kuv100,24% of the respondents prefer
scorpio and thar ,and the remaining 21% 0f the respondents prefer bolero.
PRODUCT PREFERENCE
No. of Respondents
120
100
80
60
40 No. of Respondents
20
0
Bolero Scorpio Kuv 100 Thar Total
PRODUCT PREFERENCE
MODE OF PAYMENT
Loan 19 19
Credit 32 32
Cash 36 36
Hypothecation 13 13
MODE OF PAYMENT
No. of Respondents
Loan
Credit
Cash
Hypothecation
Total
30-40 20 20
40-50 35 35
50-60 28 28
60 & above 17 17
Above the table majority 35% of the respondents covered between 40 and 50 km.28% of
the respondents covered between 50 and 60 km,20% respondents covered between 30 and 40 km
and the rest 17% respondents covered 60 & above km.
No. of Respondents
40
35
30
25
20
15
10 No. of Respondents
5
0
30-40 40-50 50-60 60 & above
MILEAGE
Family vehicles 49 49
Design 14 14
All the above 22 22
The above table indicates that 49% of the respondents were chosen family vehicles,22%
respondents were chosen all the above,19% respondents were chosen low cost and efficiency and
the rest 14% respondent were design.
MAINTENANCE COST
1500 16 16
3000 29 29
5000 34 34
From the above table it is clear that 34% of the respondents spent maintenance cost uptors
5000,29% respondents spent rs 3000,16% respondents are spent rs 1500 and the rest 13% of the
respondents spent rs 5000 and above for their maintenance cost.
PURPOSE OF OWNING
Personal 24 24
Official 23 23
For rent 40 40
Other purposes 13 13
The above table shows that the purpose of owning the car.out of 100 respondents ,40% are
used their vehicle for rent,24% respondents are for personal purpose,23% of them are used for
their official purposes and remaining 13% are other purposes.
ERIOD OF USAGE
2–3 32 32
3-4 21 21
4-above 19 19
The above table says that, maximum 32% of the respondents are using the vehicle between
2-3 years, another 28% of the respondents are using below 2 years, 21% of the respondents are
using 3-4 years and the remaining 19% of the respondents are using more than 4 years.
PERIOD OF USAGE
REASON TO BUY
Comfort 21 21
Style 38 38
Mileage 22 22
Advertisement 19 19
The above table indicate that maximum 38% of the respondents are buy the vehicle for
style, 22% of the respondents are buy the vehicle for mileage, 21% of the respondents are buy the
vehicle for their comfort and 19% of the respondents are buy the vehicle based on the
advertisement.
LEVEL OF SATISFACTION IN AFTER SALES AND SERVICE
Highly satisfied 21 21
Satisfied 55 55
Dissatisfied 14 14
Highly dissatisfied 10 10
The above table inform that the level of satisfaction in sales and service. Majority 55% of
the respondents are satisfied with the after sales and service, 21% are highly satisfied, 14% are
dissatisfied and 10% of them are highly dissatisfied.
Yes 49 49
No 51 51
Total 100 100
The above table shows that the quality problem in the vehicle. Out of 100 respondents 49%
of them are facing quality problem and 51% of the respondents are do not face any quality problem.
No.of. Respondents
120
100
80
60
40 No.of. Respondents
20
0
Yes No Total
PROBLEM FACED
KIND OF PROBLEM
Starting trouble 18 18
Mileage problem 47 47
Pic up 19 19
Battery problem 16 13
The above table shows that the problem comes across while using the vehicle. From the
100 respondents, 47% of the respondents are facing mileage problem, 19% of the respondents are
facing pic up problem,18% are facing starting trouble and 13% of them facing battery problem.
KIND OF PROBLEM
No. of Respondents
100
50
No. of Respondents
0
Starting Mileage Pic up Battery Total
trouble problem problem
KIND OF PROBLEM
Excellent 18 18
Good 47 47
Satisfaction 24 24
Poor 11 11
The above table says that the service quality of mahindra vehicle. Out of 100 respondents,
47% of the respondents rate the quality of service as good, 24% are satisfied with the service
quality, 18% says it is excellent and 11% rate it as poor.
SERVICE DURATION
Duration of service No. of Respondents Percentage
Short 44 44
Long 56 56
The above table shows that the duration of the service process .out of 100 respondent’s
majority 56% of them are feel that the service process long and remaining 44% are feel that the
service process is short.
Very high 19 19
High 44 44
Reasonable 25 25
Poor 12 12
RECOMMENTATION
Yes 54 54
No 46 46
From the above table we conclude that 54% says that the respondents would like to suggest
to others and 46% would not like to suggest to
Accessibility 31 31
Company center 28 28
Genuine parts 25 25
Others 16 16
Total 100 100
The table shows that 31% of the respondents chosen mahindra crevice center due to their
accessability,28% of the respondents chosen due to the company center,25% chosen due to the
genuine parts and the remaining 16% chosen others.
Null hypothesis
Alternative hypothesis
Degree of freedom :9
Significance level : 5%
At 5% level of significant, the critical chi square value for 9 degree of freedom is 16.919,
the calculated chi square value 16.741 is less than critical value 16.919. So, alternative
hypothesis is rejected and null hypothesis is accepted.
Interpretation
Hence, it may be concluded that there is no relationship between occupation and monthly
income of respondents.
TABLE 1
Ranking between age group and mode of payment
X Y Rank x Rank y d d2
34 19 2 3 -2 4
26 32 3 2 1 1
29 36 1 1 1 1
11 13 4 4 0 0
Interpretation
From the above table show that, for the maximum value of x the amount 34 ranking is 1,for
the next lower value of x the amount 29 ranking is 2. Similarly for the 36 of y rank is 1 and next
value of y the amount 32 rank is
TABLE 2
X Y Rank x Rank y d d2
17 39 4 2 2 4
25 40 3 1 2 4
31 13 1 3 -2 4
27 8 2 4 -2 4
16
Interpretation
From the above table show that ,for the maximum value of x amount 31 ranking is 1,for
the next lower value of x the amount 27 ranking is 2. Similarly for the 40 of rank y is 1 and the
next lower value of y amount 39 is 2.
CONCLUSION:
This study was conducts in Coimbatore with a broad objective of service quality of
Mahindra vehicles.100 customers were selected and obtained the various responses based on the
questionnaire method. The data was collected and consolidated using simple percentage method,
chi-square test and ranking analysis. Tables were used for representation to achieve the objective
of the study.
While undergoing the project mainly findings that most of the customers are satisfied
with Mahindra vehicles. The small problem those indicate that lack of selection so the main
suggestion that need to concentrate on this area.The study helps to understand that the customers
are highly happy with Mahindra service center.