Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Ketamine A Review of Use and Harm 001 PDF
Ketamine A Review of Use and Harm 001 PDF
Ketamine: a review of
use and harm
10th December 2013
ACMD
Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs
Chair: Professor Les Iversen
Secretary: Rachel Fowler
3rd Floor Seacole Building
2 Marsham Street
London
SW1P 4DF
0207 035 0555
Email: ACMD@homeoffice.gsi.gov.uk
th
10 December 2013
Dear Home Secretary and Secretary of State for Health,
On behalf of the Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs (ACMD), I am pleased to write and provide you with
advice on ketamine. The ACMD last provided advice on ketamine in 2004. The ACMD‘s present review builds on
the evidence base of the 2004 report, particularly new evidence of chronic toxicity to the bladder. The advice
covers public health issues and to this extent I am addressing it to the Secretary of State for Health.
Ketamine is widely used in veterinary medicine and in some areas of human medicine as an anaesthetic and
analgesic. Ketamine is also a drug of misuse and to give an indication of current levels of misuse, in 2012/13 it
was estimated that around 120,000 individuals had misused ketamine. The Crime Survey for England and
Wales shows that ketamine misuse is most common in males, in the 20-24 year age group and also that
ketamine is often taken in the context of polydrug use; other studies have shown that ketamine use is more
common in those who attend nightclubs.
In summary, ketamine misuse can cause a range of physical and psychological harms. There has been an
increase in acute ketamine toxicity presentations to hospitals in recent years, effects seen in these
presentations are generally short-lived but can include impaired consciousness, agitation, hallucinations and
dissociative effects. In addition, there is now good evidence that frequent and heavy ketamine misuse can
cause significant toxicity to the bladder, urinary tract and kidneys. This can be associated with severe and
disabling symptoms that typically include pain on passing urine, frequency and urgency of urination, blood in
the urine and incontinence. Whilst these changes can be reversible with ketamine cessation, there are
numerous reports of individuals having to have surgery to remove their bladders because of severe ketamine
related bladder damage. At large doses, ketamine can cause acute psychological effects that include severe
dissociation (the ‘k-hole’) and in frequent, high dose users chronic effects such as impairment in short and long
term memory, although it is not yet known whether these effects on the memory are reversible with ketamine
cessation. There is some evidence via case reports of ketamine dependence and UK drug treatment services
have seen a modest increase in numbers presenting for treatment. The ACMD makes a series of
recommendations relating to public health and treatment provision and to this extent I am addressing this
letter to the Secretary of State for Health.
There is limited evidence of ketamine causing social harm, especially in comparison to other drugs such as
heroin and cocaine, and, for example, evidence from police services of crime associated with ketamine. Case
studies presented to the ACMD by ex-users of ketamine and their families and friends, suggest that ketamine
misuse can impact negatively on families, social skills and participation in social activities. As described above,
large doses of ketamine can lead to dissociative effects which, combined with ketamine’s anaesthetic and
analgesic effects, can potentially place the user in a position where they are vulnerable to robbery and/or
assault.
On the basis of this evidence the ACMD makes two recommendations on ketamine control under the Misuse of
Drugs Act and Regulations. First, the ACMD recommends that ketamine be controlled under the Misuse of
Drugs Act (1971) as a Class B substance. This was not a unanimous decision but it is a majority recommendation
from both the Council and its Ketamine Working Group. Although there is limited evidence of ketamine misuse
causing social harm, evidence of physical harm (mainly chronic bladder toxicity but also an increase in acute
toxicity) has increased since the ACMD recommended ketamine as a Class C substance in 2004.
Second, the ACMD recommends that ketamine is placed in Schedule II of the Misuse of Drugs Regulations
(2001). Although there is limited evidence of organised diversion of ketamine, ketamine is a mainstream drug
of misuse with strong evidence of serious harm to regular, high dose misusers. The potential risk of harm if
diverted is therefore high. Ketamine is currently a Schedule IV Part 1 drug but many hospitals treat ketamine as
a higher schedule drug, in particular instituting safe custody and register requirements, and the Royal College
of Veterinary Surgeons Best Practice guidelines state that ketamine should be treated as a Schedule II drug.
In light of the established use of ketamine in human and veterinary medicine, the ACMD does, however,
recommended that the higher schedule is decided on only after consultation with practitioners on the impact
of this change on patient and veterinary care.
I would welcome the opportunity to discuss the report and recommendations with you both, and the Minister
of State for Crime Prevention and Parliamentary Under Secretary of State for Public Health to whom this letter
is copied.
Yours sincerely,
Cc:
Minister of State for Crime Prevention, Norman Baker MP
Parliamentary Under Secretary of State for Public Health, Jane Ellison MP
CONTENTS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................................................................................... 5
Background................................................................................................................................................... 5
Ketamine chemistry and pharmacology ....................................................................................................... 5
Clinical and veterinary ketamine use ........................................................................................................... 5
Ketamine misuse: prevalence and patterns of use ...................................................................................... 6
Medical harms .............................................................................................................................................. 6
Social harms ................................................................................................................................................. 8
Education and prevention ............................................................................................................................ 8
RECOMMENDATIONS ....................................................................................................................................... 9
Public health ................................................................................................................................................. 9
Treatment provision ..................................................................................................................................... 9
Forensic identification .................................................................................................................................. 9
Research ....................................................................................................................................................... 9
Control and scheduling................................................................................................................................. 9
MAIN REPORT ................................................................................................................................................ 11
Ketamine chemistry and pharmacology ......................................................................................................... 11
Chemistry ................................................................................................................................................... 11
Pharmacology ............................................................................................................................................. 11
Current control of ketamine and its analogues .......................................................................................... 13
Clinical and veterinary use of ketamine .......................................................................................................... 13
Ketamine use as an analgesic and in palliative care ................................................................................... 14
Anaesthetic use of ketamine ...................................................................................................................... 16
Ketamine and depression ........................................................................................................................... 17
Ketamine and addiction ............................................................................................................................. 17
Ketamine as a pharmacological agent for modelling psychosis ................................................................. 17
Ketamine use in veterinary medicine ......................................................................................................... 18
Ketamine misuse – Prevalence, patterns and features of use ......................................................................... 19
Data sources ............................................................................................................................................... 19
General population surveys ....................................................................................................................... 19
School surveys ............................................................................................................................................ 21
Data from studies using convenience samples .......................................................................................... 22
Diversion..................................................................................................................................................... 23
Illegal supply ............................................................................................................................................... 24
Medical harms ................................................................................................................................................ 24
Acute physical harms and treatment ......................................................................................................... 24
Chronic physical effects, harms and treatment ......................................................................................... 27
Fatalities ..................................................................................................................................................... 29
Acute psychological effects, harms and treatment .................................................................................... 30
Chronic psychological effects, harms and treatment ................................................................................. 31
Dependence and treatment ....................................................................................................................... 32
Social harms ................................................................................................................................................... 34
Information from the police and border authorities ................................................................................. 34
Case studies ................................................................................................................................................ 34
Interventions .................................................................................................................................................. 35
Education and prevention .......................................................................................................................... 35
References...................................................................................................................................................... 36
Annex A The role of the ACMD and its members ............................................................................................ 46
Role of the ACMD ....................................................................................................................................... 46
ACMD members ......................................................................................................................................... 46
Annex B The role of the ketamine Working Group and its members .............................................................. 47
ACMD Ketamine Working Group members ............................................................................................... 47
AnnEx C List of contributors ........................................................................................................................... 48
Background
1. The ACMD reviewed the harms associated with ketamine use in 2004 and recommended that ketamine should
be controlled under the Misuse of Drugs Act 1971 as a Class C substance and placed in Schedule IV Part 1 of the
Misuse of Drugs Regulations, 2001 (ACMD, 2004). The ACMD also made recommendations on routine screening
for ketamine in unexpected deaths and road traffic accidents and that ketamine be included in the British Crime
Survey in order to obtain more robust epidemiological data.
2. The ACMD’s recommendation to control ketamine was implemented on the 1 January 2006 and ketamine use
has been included in the British Crime Survey (now the ‘Crime Survey for England and Wales’) since the
reporting year 2006/7. The Department for Transport includes ketamine in its drug-driving offence proposals
consulted on earlier this year [Department for Transport, 2013].
3. Since the ACMD’s advice in 2004, the evidence of ketamine misuse and harms has grown and there is particular
concern associated with ketamine misuse and chronic toxicity including bladder and other renal tract damage.
Reflecting on this, the ACMD was requested in March 2012 by the Home Secretary to review the evidence of the
misuse and harms of ketamine and its analogues and provide advice to inform the government’s public health
response, as well as classification of ketamine.
4. The ACMD established a Ketamine Working Group (21 Mar – 17 Sep 2013) formed of ACMD members and co-
opted members (a list of members is included in Annex A) with relevant expertise to carry out the review
covering the following areas of evidence:
pharmacology;
medical and veterinary use;
epidemiology of ketamine misuse;
physical harm; and
social harm.
5. This report summarises the evidence reviewed and the ACMD’s consequent conclusions and recommendations
to the Government.
7. These substances produce a wide range of effects mediated by a variety of pharmacological mechanisms but
primarily they all act as non-competitive antagonists at glutamate receptors of the N-methyl-D-aspartate
(NMDA) sub-type.
Human medicine
9. Ketamine is used in a variety of settings, from analgesia in acute and chronic pain to anaesthesia in pre-hospital
and in-hospital emergency care in both civilian and military practice.
10. Systematic reviews suggest that there is a need for further research into the role of ketamine as an analgesic in
chronic cancer pain (palliative care) and non-cancer pain (Recommendation).
11. Use of ketamine as an analgesic is generally well tolerated but when it is used at high doses it can cause adverse
effects including dysphoria, hallucinations, vivid dreams and nightmares. There is emerging evidence that
chronic, high dose, therapeutic use of ketamine can cause urological symptoms and bladder damage. It should
12. Ketamine is used as an anaesthetic in both civilian and military practice, particularly but not exclusively in the
pre-hospital environment. It is used for procedural sedation of children in the Emergency Department.
Anaesthetic doses of ketamine are generally well tolerated, although some patients experience emergence
phenomena including hallucinations and disorientation; there is no potential for bladder toxicity with the single
doses of ketamine used in anaesthesia. Ketamine has limited impact on respiratory function and can cause an
increase in blood pressure which can be beneficial if it is used as an anaesthetic in patients with major trauma.
Veterinary medicine
13. In veterinary medicine ketamine is widely used in many species; it is the most common anaesthetic used in
horses.
Diversion
14. Data on the diversion of ketamine from human or veterinary practice are not collected nationally. However,
there have been reports from Controlled Drug Local Intelligence Networks that have reported evidence of
diversion of ketamine from health and veterinary settings in some localities. Although ketamine is in Schedule IV
Part I, many hospitals treat it as a higher schedule drug with safe custody requirements. The Royal College of
Veterinary Surgeons Best Practice guidelines state that ketamine should be treated as a Schedule II drug,
although these guidelines are not currently enforceable.
16. Along with ecstasy and amphetamines, ketamine is amongst the drugs most likely to be taken simultaneously
with other drugs, with nearly half of ketamine users reporting simultaneous polydrug use the last time that they
took ketamine.
17. Ketamine use is more common in those who attend nightclubs and there is an association between ketamine
use and frequency of attendance at nightclubs and pubs. However, the social acceptability of ketamine
consumption varies considerably between and within music cultures and social ‘scenes’.
Medical harms
Acute toxicity
18. Available data sources suggest an increase in acute ketamine toxicity in recent years in the UK. There was an
increase in access to the National Poisons Information Service concerning ketamine toxicity from 2004 (TOXBASE
accesses peaking in 2009 and telephone enquiries peaking in 2010/11). Data from a London Emergency
Department showed increasing presentations associated with acute ketamine use from 2006 to 2010 (although
many of these presentations involved ketamine in the context of polydrug use).
19. Common effects associated with acute ketamine toxicity include impaired consciousness, agitation,
hallucinations, delirium, confusion, dissociative effects, nausea, tachycardia and mild hypertension. These
features are generally short-lived and settle within 4-–12 hours; individuals presenting with acute ketamine
toxicity usually do not need pharmacological therapy.
Chronic toxicity
20. Ketamine has more recently been recognised as a cause of significant adverse effects within the bladder, urinary
tract and kidneys. The severity of urological symptoms and the degree of bladder damage appear to be in direct
proportion to the amount of ketamine used, the frequency of usage and the length of use. Some users may take
21. The symptoms associated with ketamine-related bladder damage typically include pain on passing urine,
frequency and urgency of urination, blood and matter (e.g. bladder tissue) in the urine and incontinence. These
symptoms can be severe and disabling. There is no data collected and available on how common ketamine-
related bladder effects are in the UK.
22. Cessation of ketamine gives the best chance of symptomatic relief and improvement in bladder pathological
changes. It is vital that symptoms are picked up early by healthcare practitioners in order that support can be
provided for ketamine cessation (particularly for those with ketamine dependence) and appropriate analgesia
provided for the pain associated with ketamine-related bladder damage (recommendation). The bladder in
many cases will heal following ketamine cessation and although some symptoms may persist, these generally
become more manageable. However, in some cases severe bladder damage may require surgery including
removal of all or part of the bladder. More research is required into the incidence, mechanisms and
management of bladder damage caused by ketamine use (Recommendation).
23. Up to one-third of long-term ketamine users experience chronic, severe abdominal (‘tummy’) pain; this is often
referred to by users as ‘K cramps’. There are emerging reports of liver toxicity associated with chronic ketamine
use.
Deaths
24. Data from the National Programme on Substance Abuse Deaths suggest that the first death in which ketamine
was implicated occurred in 1997. From then until 2005 there were less than five deaths per year where
ketamine was either found in post-mortem toxicology samples and/or implicated in death. The number of these
cases increased until 2009 peaking at 26 and 21 respectively; there was then a decline with the number of cases
falling to nine and six in 2012.
25. Data from the Office for National Statistics has shown an increase in deaths in which ketamine was detected in
post-mortem samples since 2006 (0–3 per year in 2001–2006 to 7–22 per year in 2007–2012). It is not possible
from these data to determine whether ketamine was responsible for the death(s); it is also important to note
that there is variation between coroners regarding drug testing in deaths. The new Chief Coroner should
promote awareness of the importance of accurately documenting substance-related deaths (Recommendation).
Social harms
Police and border authorities
30. Reports from UK police services suggest increasing ketamine use in many UK regions, but there is limited
evidence of crime associated with ketamine and the scale of ketamine supply in the UK by criminal groups is
difficult to quantify.
31. There is limited forensic testing of ketamine seizures; results that are available suggest that illicit ketamine is
generally of moderate to high purity but may contain other psychoactive substances including cathinones,
cocaine and piperazines.
32. The scale of ketamine supply to the UK is unknown due to challenges with identifying border seizures of the
drug. Testing at the border should be made more effective by providing the technology to accurately field test at
the earliest opportunity (Recommendation).
Social harms
33. There are fewer data available on the social harms associated with ketamine than for other drugs such as heroin
or cocaine. Case studies presented by ex-users of ketamine and families/friends affected by ketamine use
suggest that frequent ketamine use can impact negatively on families, social skills and participation in social
activities.
34. At large doses, ketamine can induce dissociation (the ‘K-hole’). The user experiences intense detachment that
can be an unpleasant and frightening experience. The company of others (e.g. friends, staff in
nightclubs/festivals) can help the user deal with this experience. The dissociative effect of ketamine can
potentially place the user in a position where they are vulnerable to robbery, assault and/or rape.
Public health
Healthcare practitioners, particularly, but not just, GPs, should ask patients presenting with unexplained urinary
tract symptoms about ketamine use.
Users should be made aware of the long-term physical risks of frequent ketamine misuse. Bladder damage and
the symptoms associated with it (urinary frequency, haematuria and incontinence) can be significant and
disabling and so a strong public health message should be constructed.
Users and staff in nightclubs and at festivals should be informed that the analgesic, anaesthetic and dissociative
effects of ketamine can potentially make users vulnerable to robbery, assault and/or rape. Users should ensure
that they have friends with them and staff in nightclubs and at festivals should be aware of these risks
associated with ketamine use.
Treatment provision
Ketamine should be considered as dependence forming for some users and treatment services need to be able
to respond to this need with NICE-recommended psychosocial interventions.
There is a need for joined-up treatment of those who have developed ketamine-induced ulcerative cystitis.
Urological interventions should be co-ordinated with psychosocial interventions that promote future abstinence
from the drug and provision of appropriate analgesia for the pain associated with ketamine-related bladder
damage.
Forensic identification
The scale of ketamine supply to the UK is unknown due to challenges with identifying border seizures of the
drug. Testing at the border should be made more effective by providing the technology to accurately field test.
The new Chief Coroner should promote awareness of the importance of accurately documenting ketamine and
other substance-related deaths.
Research
It is recommended that research is carried out in the following three areas.
- The incidence, mechanisms and management of bladder damage caused by ketamine use.
- The long-term neurological, neurocognitive and psychiatric effects of ketamine use, including follow-up on
those who subsequently stop using ketamine. Such studies could ideally be interdisciplinary and allow
further investigation of ketamine’s physical effects including urological and liver toxicity.
- The therapeutic role of ketamine in chronic cancer and non-cancer pain in comparison to other analgesic
options.
Scheduling
There is limited evidence of organised diversion of ketamine; however, ketamine is a mainstream drug of misuse
with strong evidence of serious harm to regular, high-dose misusers, therefore, the potential risk of harm if
diverted is relatively high. Many hospitals treat ketamine as a higher schedule drug, in particular instituting safe
custody and register requirements; Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons Best Practice guidelines state that
ketamine should be treated as a Schedule II drug.
Chemistry
1. Ketamine is a member of a group of compounds known as arylcyclohexylamines. Arylcyclohexylamines have
structures based on cyclohexylamine with an aryl group (an aromatic ring of some type) attached to the atom of
the cyclohexyl ring to which the amine group is also linked. The arylcyclohexylamines include a number of
substances which have psychoactive effects, some of which are used as pharmaceuticals while others have
appeared as drugs of abuse. These were reviewed as part of the ACMD’s report on methoxetamine and related
materials (2012).
3. Pharmaceutical ketamine products usually contain the hydrochloride salt of ketamine. There is very little
information on the composition of illicit ketamine as detailed analysis is not routinely commissioned from
forensic laboratories but it is probable that seizures consist of racemic mixtures of the hydrochloride salt.
Pharmacology
Ketamine pharmacokinetics
4. Ketamine has high lipid and water solubility and low protein binding and is extensively distributed throughout
the body (volume of distribution 3–5 L/kg) (Radonavanovic, 2003).
5. When given orally it undergoes first pass metabolism in the liver where it is transformed into norketamine and
then dehydronorketamine (Sinner, 2008). Peak plasma concentrations are reached within a minute
intravenously, 5–15 minutes intramuscularly and 30 minutes orally. The duration of action of ketamine is 30
minutes to two hours intramuscularly and 4–6 hours orally (Quibell, 2011).
Ketamine pharmacodynamics
7. Ketamine and related arylcyclohexylamines produce a wide range of effects mediated by a variety of
pharmacological mechanisms. Primarily, they all act as non-competitive antagonists at N-methyl-D-aspartate
(NMDA) receptors where they bind at the so-called PCP site on the NMDA receptor (Anis, 1983; Roth, 2013).
These receptors, which play a critical role in glutaminergically mediated excitatory neurotransmission, are
believed to be the principal molecular targets for the anaesthetic action of ketamine and for its
psychotomimetic properties. Its reported antidepressant activity has also been attributed to this mechanism in
the brain (Zarate, 2006) and its analgesic properties, in part, to the same mechanism in dorsal horn neurons
(Quibell, 2011).
8. Systemic administration of NMDA receptor antagonists such as ketamine is known to increase the release of
dopamine in the nucleus accumbens region of brain (Matulewicz, 2010), an activity which is typically associated
with addiction liability (Cadoni, 2007). In addition to its action on NMDA receptors, ketamine also acts at
dopamine D2 and 5-HT2A receptors (Kapur, 2002; Waelbers, 2013). Activation of 5-HT2A receptors is thought to
be related to perceptual disorders and hallucinations (Dursun, 1992). At the concentrations employed in human
models, ketamine also shows both a stereospecific high-affinity for mu; delta; and for sigma opioid receptors
(for a review see Kapur, 2002) and it also affects monoamine transporters (Nishimura, 1999). The complex
neurochemical profile of ketamine reflect its actions as a dissociative anaesthetic, psychostimulant and
analgesic.
9. Overall, recent studies suggest that ketamine leads to a state of increased glutamatergic transmission, which is
linked to psychotic disturbances (Kraguljac, 2013; Sos, 2013). Ketamine also enhances the descending inhibiting
serotoninergic pathway and may exert antidepressant effects (Mion, 2013), possibly because of the significance
of glutamatergic pathways in depression. Treatment with NMDA receptor antagonists has shown the ability to
encourage the formation of new synaptic connections and reverse stress-induced neural changes (Zarate, 2013).
However, it has been suggested that there may be a substantial relationship between ketamine antidepressant
and psychotomimetic effects. This relationship could be mediated by the initial steps of ketamine action through
NMDA receptors (Sos, 2013).
10. Experimentally, ketamine may promote neuronal apoptotic lesions but, in usual clinical practice, it does not
induce neurotoxicity. The consequences of high doses, repeatedly administered, are not known. Cognitive
disturbances are frequent in chronic users of ketamine, as well as frontal white matter abnormalities (Mion,
2013).
11. Contributing to ketamine’s analgesic action is the inhibition of nitric oxide synthase resulting in a decrease in
nitric oxide production (Aroni, 2009). Ketamine also binds to opioid receptors but the binding affinity is too low
to contribute to analgesic effects (Rowland, 2005) although there are suggestions that the binding to sigma
opioid receptors may also play a role in its antidepressant activity (Robson, 2012).
12. Other actions, probably contributing to analgesic activity include blockade of voltage-sensitive calcium channels,
sodium channel depression and inhibition of monoamine reuptake (Quibell, 2011; Meller, 1996). Ketamine also
possesses anticholinergic activity (antagonist activity at muscarinic acetylcholine receptors) which may also
contribute to its psychotomimetic properties (Dunieu, 1995).
Related substances
13. Phencyclidine (PCP) was the first in this series of arylcycloalkylamines to be synthesised. It was marketed in the
1950s and was used as an analgesic/anaesthetic in various surgical procedures but soon fell into disfavour
because of its tendency to produce marked and unpleasant behavioural side effects including agitation,
delusions and hallucinations. At the time these effects were attributed to its anticholinergic activity and to its
structural resemblance to psychotomimetic glycollates and benzilates (Brimblecombe 1975; Neubauer, 1996).
There were also suggestions that the effects produced were very similar to symptoms of chronic schizophrenia
14. Illicit use of phencyclidine began to be reported in the mid-1960s in the USA and has persisted there and in
other parts of the world peaking in the late 1970s. During this time many analogues of phencyclidine were
synthesised (Roth, 2013) and some appeared as street drugs. The limited information available would indicate
that overall their pharmacological profiles are similar to those described for ketamine and phencyclidine. This is
certainly the case for methoxetamine and for the 3- and 4-methoxy analogues of phencyclidine which have been
shown to bind with high affinity to the PCP-site on the NMDA receptor (Roth, 2013).
Toxicology
15. There have been numerous animal studies that have further elucidated the mechanisms of toxicity of ketamine;
these are beyond the scope of this report. An overview of these studies can be found in this book chapter: Li Q,
Chan WM, Rudd JA, Wang CM, Lam PYH, Mun Wai MS, Wood DM, Dargan PI, Yew DT. Ketamine. In: Novel
Psychoactive Substances: Classification, Pharmacology and Toxicology. Ed: Dargan PI, Wood DM. Academic
Press 2013, ISBN: 978-0124158160.
17. In 1984 three other psychoactive arylcyclohexylamines related to PCP (eticyclidine, rolicyclidine and
tenocyclidine) were added to Class A of the Misuse of Drugs Act 1971 as named compounds following reports of
misuse, again primarily in the USA. All three were added to Schedule I of the Misuse of Drugs Regulations.
18. In January 2006 ketamine was added to Class C of the Misuse of Drugs Act as a named compound following
increased evidence of abuse in the UK. It was placed in Schedule IV (part 1) of the Misuse of Drugs Regulations.
19. In February 2013 a clause containing two generic definitions was added to both the Misuse of Drugs Act and the
Misuse of Drugs Regulations to control two groups of arylcyclohexylamines. These generic controls covered a
further range of materials related to PCP as well as methoxetamine and a range of methoxetamine-related
materials. Methoxetamine and other psychoactive derivatives of ketamine and PCP were beginning to be
offered for sale on ‘legal high’ websites. The generic controls were constructed so as to limit their scope to
materials which were known, or expected, to produce psychoactive effects. All materials covered by these
controls were added to Class B of the Misuse of Drugs Act 1971 and to Schedule I of the Misuse of Dugs
Regulations.
20. These 2013 generic controls excluded a number of materials through the wording ‘…any compound (not being
ketamine, tiletamine or a compound for the time being specified in paragraph 1(a) of Part 1 of the Schedule)’;
the wording of the exclusion clause within the Regulations is slightly different, but the effect is the same. This
meant that ketamine remained in Class C, Schedule IV (Part 1), while tiletamine, a pharmaceutical with very little
evidence of abuse, was specifically excluded from control and those materials falling within the scope of the new
generics, but already listed by name, remained within Class A (eticyclidine, PCP, rolicyclidine and tenocyclidine)
and Schedule I or II. There are no known new structural analogues of ketamine that are available in the UK that
are not covered by this 2013 Generic.
21. Thus, different arylcyclohexylamines are currently controlled within Classes A, B and C and in Schedules I, II and
IV (Part I).
22. Ketamine has been used therapeutically as a pharmaceutical agent in a number of areas of both human and
veterinary medicine for over 50 years, in particular as an analgesic and anaesthetic. Studies are underway
exploring the use of ketamine for treatment-resistant depression, for the treatment of addiction and it is also
being explored experimentally as a pharmacological model of psychosis.
24. Ketamine is available in the UK as a racemic mixture in vials for parenteral use containing 200 mg, 500 mg or 1 g
of ketamine solution. As noted below, initial doses of ketamine are generally much lower than this and so there
can be substantial wastage of unused ketamine from these preparations. An oral solution can be obtained as a
special order from Martindale or prepared by a local pharmacy from the parenteral preparation.
25. Ketamine is generally administered orally (PO), by intravenous injection (IV) or by subcutaneous injection
(SC)/continuous subcutaneous infusion (CSCI); it can also be administered by intramuscular injection (IM),
sublingually (SL), intranasally (IN) and per-rectum (PR) (Visser, 2006, Palliative Care Guideline).
26. Ketamine is used in a wide range of doses, depending on the indication (Visser, 2006, Palliative Care Guideline).
For analgesia initial oral doses are generally 2-25 mg three to four times a day, increased to 40-60 mg four times
a day. Intravenous doses for analgesia are typically 2.5-5 mg as required and 0.5-1 mg/kg to cover procedures
associated with severe pain, or where conscious sedation is required. Subcutaneous doses are typically 2.5-25
mg, with continuous subcutaneous injection (CSCI) generally given at a dose of 50-100 mg/24hours, increased
gradually if required to 600 mg/24 hours. The upper limits of these doses are similar to the doses reported to be
used in a typical session by those who misuse ketamine (in one study 31% of users report using less than 0.125
g; 35% between 0.25 g and 0.5 g; 34% more than 1 g; and 5% more than 3 g per typical session (Winstock, 2012).
28. Amongst the 32 case reports/series in the Cochrane Review of ketamine use in cancer pain, the majority (28/32,
88%) described improved pain control with ketamine (Bell, 2012). In general, adverse effects were not reported
as severe and in only two reports ketamine was withdrawn because of significant ‘adverse cognitive effects’.
Commonly reported adverse effects were sedation and hallucinations.
29. A randomised controlled trial of subcutaneous ketamine for cancer pain published more recently showed that
there was no difference in pain control with ketamine use; however, adverse effects were significantly more
common in the ketamine group (Hardy, 2012).
33. Ketamine is particularly used in paediatric burns patients in combination with midazolam for ‘conscious
sedation’; a recent observational study has shown that it is generally effective and well-tolerated in paediatric
burns patients (O’Hara, 2013). Ketamine (1 mg/kg intravenously) is recommended by the College of Emergency
Medicine for analgesic sedation for children who need a painful or frightening procedure as part of their
emergency care (CEM).
35. There are five reports of significant bladder effects related to therapeutic use of ketamine as an analgesic for
individuals with chronic pain at doses of 240 mg-1 g/day in adults and 8 mg/kg/day in a child (Storr, 2009;
Gregoire, 2008; Shahzad, K., 2012). In the most recent report, a 52-year-old male who had been using oral
ketamine at a dose of 240 mg/day for three years for chronic back pain developed severe bladder damage that
did not settle when the ketamine was stopped; the patient required a cystectomy for management of his severe
bladder damage (Shahzad, 2012).
36. In a 2013 survey of UK palliative care specialist doctors and nurses, 16% (54/340) reported seeing unexplained
urinary tract symptoms (not related to urinary tract infection) in patients receiving ketamine and 9% (29/312)
reported seeing unexplained liver function tests and/or abdominal pain in patients receiving ketamine. In a
previous survey conducted in 2011 by the same group, 16 of 164 (9%) reported seeing unexplained urinary tract
symptoms in patients receiving ketamine and these occurred at total daily doses of ketamine 500 mg in 13
cases and > 500 mg in three cases. (Personal communication Dr Andrew Wilcock, Nottingham University
Hospital NHS Trust)
37. There are also reports of abnormal liver function tests associated with therapeutic use of ketamine (Dundee,
1980; Noppers, 2011). In one series, 14/34 patients anaesthetised with ketamine had abnormal liver function
tests (Dundee, 1980); the other report described three patients receiving ketamine by intermitted intravenous
infusion who developed abnormal liver function related to ketamine which settled within two months of
stopping ketamine (Noppers, 2011).
Clinical issues
40. Ketamine is an intravenous anaesthetic agent that has significant analgesic properties in sub-anaesthetic doses.
It produces a ‘dissociative anaesthesia’ – profound analgesia with a light sleep. The typical anaesthetic dose is 1-
2 mg/kg intravenously (duration of action ~ 5-10 minutes) or 10 mg/kg intramuscularly (duration of action ~ 20-
30 minutes) (Electronic Medicines Compendium).
41. Ketamine is a stable preparation requiring no special storage conditions and with a shelf life of up to five years.
It is available in various concentrations from 10 mg/ml to 100 mg/ml.
42. In military practice, ketamine is currently used throughout the entire military chain of evacuation, from the point
of wounding, through the field hospital and on to the receiving hospital in the UK. In addition to its use as an
anaesthetic for emergencies such as field amputation, it has been very useful for treating pain that responds
poorly to opiates, such as pain associated with nerve injury. All doctors joining the Army are given a full day of
training that focuses on the treatment of pain (Davey, 2012) and on anaesthesia; ketamine use is one of the
sections covered on this course.
43. In civilian practice ketamine is most commonly used as an anaesthetic in the pre-hospital setting. In the
Emergency Department ketamine is particularly used for paediatric sedation for children requiring sedation for
painful or frightening procedures (CEM); less commonly it is used in adult patients in the Emergency Department
for ‘dissociative sedation’ (RCA/CEM). In addition to its use as an anaesthetic in the pre-hospital environment,
ketamine may also be used as an analgesic, for example in major trauma (Jennings, 2011).
44. Ketamine increases blood pressure (Tweed, 1972) and is therefore often considered the anaesthetic of choice in
trauma patients with haemodynamic compromise (Morris, C., 2009; Jensen, 2010). Previously ketamine was
contraindicated in traumatic brain injury because of concerns that it increased intracranial pressure (Prabu,
2004); however, more recent studies have shown no evidence to suggest that ketamine use is associated with
harm in patients with traumatic brain injury (Hughes, 2011). Ketamine use is associated with a lower risk of
respiratory depression and relatively preserved airway reflexes compared to other anaesthetic agents; however,
it is still important that facilities for airway support are available when ketamine is used at anaesthetic doses
(RCA/CEM; Jensen, 2010).
45. In the UK, ketamine use can only be initiated by authorised prescribers. Whist it may be administered by
paramedics, a prescriber must authorise its use. In an emergency situation a doctor can request ketamine to
take with them for use in the pre-hospital situation as they are allowed to possess controlled drugs. Specific
disaster procedures are in place to allow supply of ketamine for major trauma incidents. Within the military
ketamine is only handled by registered physicians; it is not carried by nurses or combat medical technicians.
47. Urological problems are not a problem with single-dose use of ketamine for anaesthesia.
49. Several studies have now shown that a single, sub-anaesthetic dose of ketamine can produce clinical
improvement within hours in treatment-resistant unipolar depressed patients (Berman, 2000; Zarate, 2006)
including those with electroconvulsive-therapy-(ECT)-resistant depression (Ibrahim, 2011; Aan het Rot, 2012).
Furthermore, three studies with individuals with treatment-resistant bipolar depression have also shown some
effectiveness (Diazgranados, 2010; Ibrahim, 2011; Zarate, 2013). However, it is notable that all of these studies
have been in patients with severe, treatment-resistant depression and describe the use of ketamine by the
intravenous route.
50. Not all treatment-resistant depressed patients respond to ketamine and in those that do, the length of the
antidepressant effect following one or two doses is variable and only lasts hours to days (Krystal, 2013). There
are limited data on the longer-term antidepressant effect of ketamine.
51. Studies to date have administered one or two doses of ketamine over time. Some (e.g. Oxford group
presentation to the ACMD by Rupert McShane) are exploring whether ‘top-up’ dosing might prolong the
antidepressant effect. The effects of multiple dosing should be monitored if repeated dosing is to be a strategy
in the treatment of depression. Further research is clearly needed to determine the optimum treatment strategy
and ketamine is currently only used within research studies for patients with severe treatment-resistant
depression and not as a ‘mainstream’ antidepressant.
52. At present most research has used intermittent or single-dose intravenous dosing of ketamine making it less
likely to be applicable to the management of most patients with depression. However, there is an on-going
clinical trial of intranasal ketamine (Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT01304147). It is important to note that some studies
have suggested that ketamine misuse may be associated with an increased risk of depression and so it is
important that this is addressed in any future studies investigating longer-term ketamine use for the
management of depression.
53. Ketamine has recently been shown to be associated with a decrease in suicidal ideation (Machado-Vieira, 2012).
Because ketamine has analgesic properties, it has been used to treat depression in the context of chronic pain in
patients with cancer (Thangathurai, 2010; Zanicotti, 2012).
55. More research is needed in this area. The studies of treatment-resistant depressed patients noted above
suggest added efficacy for those with comorbid alcohol dependence or a family history of alcoholism. Ketamine
appears more effective in individuals with a family history of alcoholism (Phelps, 2009; Luckenbaugh, 2012). A
study of depressed patients who had comorbid alcohol dependence showed that another NMDA receptor
antagonist (memantine) had efficacy (Muhonen, 2008).
59. These products can either be used as a sole agent in cats and non-human primates for restraint/minor surgical
procedures, or they may be used in combination with other VMPs for induction of anaesthesia in cats, dogs,
horses, donkeys, cattle, pigs and non-human primates.
60. Ketamine is the VMP most commonly used for induction of anaesthesia in horses both in the field and in
hospital/clinic-based veterinary practice. It is administered by intravenous (IV) injection only, at a dose rate of
2.2 mg/kg bodyweight following IV detomidine, romifidine or xylazine (VMD, 2013; Mason, 2004). It is estimated
that 90% or more equine anaesthetics rely on ketamine.
61. A benefit of ketamine use in horses is that cardiovascular parameters are well maintained; however, this may be
somewhat blunted by administration of other VMPs. The recovery from ketamine-based anaesthesia is
considered to be good and superior to recovery from inhalational anaesthetics (Hall, 2003; Mason, 2004; Taylor,
1982).
62. In farm animal practice (food-producing species), ketamine is authorised for administration to cattle, at an IV
dose of 2-5 mg/kg bodyweight following IV/intramuscular (IM) xylazine. In pigs, an IM dose of 15-20 mg/kg
bodyweight is administered, in combination with IM azaperone (VMD product information database 2013). Use
of ketamine in cattle and pigs as would be expected is significantly less common than in horses.
63. A benefit of ketamine use with farm animals is that procedures are often being conducted ‘in the field’ with
limited monitoring equipment available. The properties of ketamine make it advantageous to other VMPs in
these circumstances.
64. In dogs, ketamine is authorised for use at an IM dose of 5-7.5 mg/kg bodyweight following IM medetomidine ±
IM butorphanol or 10-15 mg/kg bodyweight following IM xylazine (VMD product information database 2013).
65. In cats, ketamine is authorised for administration IM as a sole agent at a dose of 11 mg/kg bodyweight for minor
restraint, or 22-33 mg/kg bodyweight for minor surgery (pre-medication with acepromazine may be used) or
when more restraint is required. When used in combination with other VMPs in cats, the recommended IM
dose reduces to 2.5-7.5 mg/kg bodyweight administered following IM medetomidine ± IM butorphanol, and
reduces further with IV administration to 1.25-2.5 mg/kg bodyweight. Alternatively, an IM/subcutaneous (SC)
dose of 10-22 mg/kg bodyweight may be administered following IM/SC xylazine (VMD, 2013). Use of ketamine
in cats is more common than in dogs, cattle and pigs but much less than in horses.
66. Other injectable anaesthetic agents (e.g. propofol, alfaxan) are authorised as VMPs and commonly used in dogs
and cats. While these agents may offer advantages over ketamine in some situations, there are cases where
ketamine cannot easily be substituted, e.g. cats in respiratory distress that require imaging procedures and
cannot remain still or animals that are too small for endotracheal intubation. In these cases ketamine is
beneficial because even though it may produce mild, dose-dependent respiratory depression, laryngeal and
pharyngeal reflexes are reasonably well maintained.
67. In addition to the above, the Veterinary Medicines Regulations make provision for veterinary surgeons to use
their clinical judgement to use authorised medicines in a manner beyond the scope of the authorisation, when
there is no suitable VMP. This is termed ‘cascade use’ and allows other legitimate uses of ketamine, outside the
scope of what is specified with the authorised product (VMD veterinary medicines guidance note 13 2013) – for
example, use in another target species such as in rabbits, hamsters, goats or wildlife where almost all cases are
anaesthetised using ketamine.
69. Increased sensitivity, especially to acoustic stimuli in the recovery period after ketamine use, is noted in
veterinary practice. The dissociative nature of the agent does mean that when used for a shorter duration (as
seen with smaller animals requiring minor procedures), recovery must be in a non-stimulatory environment for
the animal and veterinary staff’s safety, to avoid injury to either the animal or veterinary staff.
Data sources
70. This section describes available data on ketamine misuse prevalence from the UK. The Crime Survey for England
and Wales (CSEW, formerly British Crime Survey (BCS)) includes ketamine and is the most reliable general
population estimate of drug use because of its high quality methodology and sampling procedure (ketamine is
included in the Scottish Crime and Justice Survey but not in the Northern Irish Drug Use Prevalence). However,
one notable criticism of the CSEW (along with other household surveys) is that it is likely to underestimate use in
sub-populations such as young people, students, and those in the criminal justice estate. Hence general
population figures should be considered alongside data from specific target groups. However, targeted surveys
that have been conducted in the UK have typically used convenience sampling (i.e. non-probabilistic or non-
random designs), meaning that data obtained from these types of survey cannot be generalised to the wider
population, do not allow insight into time trends, and are only valid for the population studied (i.e. the data
cannot be generalised to the general population). The Smoking, drinking and drug use among young people
survey reports robust generalisable estimates for 11- to 15-year-olds in England.
72. Analysis of simultaneous polysubstance use patterns indicates that, along with ecstasy and amphetamines,
ketamine is amongst the drugs most likely to be taken simultaneously with other drugs, with nearly half of
ketamine users reporting simultaneous polydrug use the last time that they took ketamine. Although base
numbers were small (n=50), for 48% of ketamine users their most recent ketamine-use episode included use of
another drug (40% drugs other than cannabis, 8% cannabis only). Seventy-four per cent of the most recent
episodes mentioned alcohol, and 77% of episodes included alcohol and other substances (Home Office, 2012).
73. In terms of past year polysubstance use (not necessarily simultaneous), the BCS for 2009/10 (Hoare, 2010)
provides data on past year ketamine users’ use of other illicit drugs in the past year. Past year ketamine users
are more likely than users of any other illicit drugs to have used other illicit drugs in the past year. Only 3% of
past year ketamine users report that they did not take any other illicit drugs in the past year. For the other 97%
of past year ketamine users, the drugs they were most likely to have taken in the past year were cannabis (86%),
followed by ecstasy (85%), and powder cocaine (77%). Therefore, when looking at past year use, as well as when
looking at most recent use, national surveys suggest that ketamine use is more likely than many other illicit
drugs to be associated with the use of other drugs.
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
2006/07 2007/08 2008/09 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 2012/13
16-59 1.3 1.4 1.8 2.0 2.2 2.5 2.3
16-24 2.3 2.2 3.6 4.0 4.4 4.0 3.3
Figure 2 Lifetime prevalence of ketamine use in England and Wales (Crime Survey for England and Wales 2012/13)
1.5
%
0.5
0
2006/07 2007/08 2008/09 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 2012/13
16-59 0.3 0.4 0.6 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.4
16-24 0.8 0.9 1.9 1.7 2.1 1.8 0.8
Figure 3 Last year prevalence of ketamine use in England and Wales (Crime Survey for England and Wales 2012/13)
0.4
0.2
0.0
2006/07 2007/08 2008/09 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12
16-59 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.2
16-24 0.3 0.3 0.8 0.9 0.9 0.5
Figure 4 Last month prevalence of ketamine use in England and Wales (Crime Survey for England and Wales 2011/12)
Table 1 Estimates of the absolute numbers of people using ketamine in lifetime and last year (2012/13) and last month
(2010/11) (Crime Survey for England and Wales)
School surveys
England
75. The Smoking, drinking and drug use among young people survey, conducted with English school children aged
11–15, included ketamine in its most recent sweep (2011)). Thirty-five per cent of children reported having
heard of ketamine (31% in 2005) and 0.5% reported using it in the previous year. Use has remained relatively
stable since 2005 (Figure 5). Use increased with age; 0.3% in 13-year-olds to 1.1% in 15-year-olds. The median
age of initiation was 15 (3% of all 11- to 15-year-olds).
76. Two per cent of all children aged 11–15 reported being offered ketamine in 2010; this has remained stable since
2005. Six per cent of male 15-year-olds and 5% of females reported having been offered ketamine in 2010.
0.6
0.4
%
0.2
0
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
All 0.4 0.5 0.4 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.5
Figure 5 Last year prevalence of ketamine use in 11- to 15-year-olds in England (The Smoking, drinking and drug use
among young people survey)
Scotland
77. The Scottish Schools Adolescent Lifestyle and Substance Use Survey (SALSUS) reported on ketamine use in 13-
and 15-year-olds for the first time in 2010 (Scottish Government, 2011). Two per cent of 15-year-old and 1% of
13-year-old boys, and 1% of 15-year-old and 0% of 13-year-old girls reported use of ketamine in their lifetime.
One per cent of both 13- and 15-year-old boys, and 0% of 13- and 15-year-old girls reported use of ketamine in
the previous year. One per cent of both 13- and 15-year-old boys, and 0% of both 13- and 15-year-old girls
reported use of ketamine in the previous month. Three per cent of 15-year-old boys and 1% of girls reported
being offered ketamine. In 13-year-olds the respective proportions were 1%.
ESPAD
78. The 2011 pan-EU substance use survey ESPAD (www.espad.org) conducted every four years (including the UK) in
15/16-year-olds does not include ketamine.
81. Data from 2012 indicated that 47.8% of UK respondents self-reported lifetime use, 24.5% in the previous 12
months, and 19.8% in the previous month. Forty per cent of respondents who self-identified as regular clubbers
reported use in the previous month. However, as samples are independent and not drawn from a sampling
frame, it is important not to infer trends in prevalence.
83. Ketamine use varies considerably between and within different dance clubs, dance ‘scenes’ and regions,
however. A series of convenience sample surveys of drinking and drug use by over 650 bar and club customers
conducted in the Manchester night-time economy in the 2000s found that self-reported ketamine use was
higher in the ‘gay friendly’ night-time economy and in dance clubs playing hard dance, funky house and trance
music, and lowest in ‘straight’ bars and in dance clubs playing drum and bass (Measham, 2009).
84. An ongoing study of South London gay clubbers (2010 to date) has collected data from the same gay dance clubs
in July of each year. Surveys were conducted in July 2010 (Measham, 2011a), July 2011 (Wood, 2012) and July
2012 (Wood, 2013) with convenience samples of 308, 315 and 330 attendees respectively. Self-reported
ketamine use was very high amongst gay clubbers compared to the general young adult population and very
similar between the 2010, 2011 and 2012 data collection periods: 57%, 60% and 67.1% reported lifetime use in
2010, 2011 and 2012 respectively; 46%, 49% and 43.6% reported past year use in 2010, 2011 and 2012
respectively; 30%, 35% and 24.4% reported past month use in 2010, 2011 and 2012. Fourteen per cent and 13%
reported having taken and/or intending to take ketamine on the fieldwork night in 2010 and 2011 respectively.
85. A further distinction exists regarding at what point and where in the clubbing ‘night out’ ketamine consumption
occurs. A qualitative study of ketamine users in Manchester concluded that ketamine use was more popular
both at nightclub ‘after parties’ and at ‘chill out’ house parties that were seen as subject to less scrutiny and
allowed users to have a greater control over the context to their consumption (Moore, 2008). Furthermore,
some users actively sought out the more introspective or ‘semi-social’ rather than sociable aspects of the
ketamine experience after an evening out socialising.
86. Despite the much higher prevalence of ketamine use amongst clubbers than non-clubbers, the social
acceptability of ketamine consumption varies considerably between and within music cultures and social
‘scenes’. For example, a qualitative study of ketamine users in south west England noted that its use was more
popular amongst groups following ‘alternative’ lifestyles, such as ‘free party’ ravers, travellers and squatters
(Riley., 2008). Furthermore, for both users and non-users that they interviewed, ketamine use was seen as
potentially socially divisive even within a cultural or social group because of the dissociative and anaesthetic
87. The type of nightlife patron also seems important in determining ketamine prevalence (Measham, 2009). When
Measham and colleagues (Measham, 2011b) investigated ketamine use in more ‘mainstream’ UK nightlife –
participants were surveyed on main thoroughfares in Lancashire town/city centres in the UK in autumn 2010 –
they found self-reported ketamine lifetime use of 16%, 9% in past year, 5% in past month and 1% taken and/or
planning to take on the fieldwork night. A similar study conducted in mainstream nightclubs in the same
Lancashire towns/city centres just over a year later in spring 2012 found similar levels of ketamine use, with self-
reported lifetime ketamine use of 18%, past year use of 11%, past month use of 3%, and 0% reporting use
(already taken and/or planned) on the fieldwork night (Measham, 2012).
Diversion
Human medicine
89. In December 2005 a change to the Misuse of Drugs Act 1971 made Ketamine a Class C controlled substance and
placed it in Schedule IV part 1 of the Misuse of Drugs Regulations 2001. Specific controlled drug prescription
requirements and safe custody requirements do not apply to this schedule. However, many hospital pharmacy
services treat ketamine as a higher schedule drug, in particular instituting safe custody and register
requirements. It is reported that this works well, is not too onerous and does not impact negatively on ketamine
use in hospitals.
90. There is no recording at a national level of diversion of ketamine from legitimate use in human medicine.
However, there are well-documented cases during the last five years from a number of hospitals and veterinary
practices of diversion of ketamine; these are currently only collected at a local level and not collated nationally.
91. The Health Act 2006 and The Controlled Drugs (Supervision of Management and Use) Regulations 2006 that
were introduced following the Shipman Enquiry brought in additional governance arrangements and sharing of
information between health and social care professionals in local intelligence networks. Information about
diversion of ketamine could, and has been, shared through these networks. The concerns reported in the early
days were mainly from veterinary practice. Through improved governance, greater awareness and sharing of
information there are now fewer reported concerns.
92. Ketamine is currently supplied in multi-dose vials but usually only a single dose is used, this results in a
significant amount of waste of ketamine and the potential for diversion of this unused drug portion.
93. There are anecdotal reports from clinicians working in drug dependence clinics of patients reporting that they
have sourced ketamine from the human and veterinary medicine supply chain.
Veterinary medicine
94. The veterinary medicines supply chain involves three parties: from manufacturers to registered wholesale
dealers and finally veterinary practices, which are mainly clinical practices but may also be academic and
commercial research laboratories. Medicines would not be imported directly by veterinary practices. Inspections
of each party are carried out every 3–4 years by the MHRA or VMD and the Home Office in the case of research
establishments.
95. Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons Best Practice guidelines state that ketamine should be treated as a
Schedule II drug under the Misuse of Drugs Regulations 2001, although these guidelines are not currently
enforceable because ketamine is in Schedule IV part 1 of the Misuse of Drugs Regulations 2001.
97. A report run by the Inspection and Investigation Team at the VMD for the period January 2013 to May 2013,
identified that 316 veterinary practices have been inspected and at 85 of those premises, a minor ‘deficiency’
was cited against ‘Ketamine register’. This has been interpreted to mean that either an informal register was
not being kept or that the register was not clearly auditable or that the locked cabinet was not secure.
However, not all inspectors report a lack of an informal register as a deficiency as this is currently not required
for Schedule IV drugs. The VMD inspectors also report that a greater proportion of deficiencies are found within
equine veterinary practice (either exclusive equine practice or mixed practice), or when the medicine is stored in
multiple locations (e.g. may be kept in a veterinary surgeon’s car with ambulatory practice, as well as being
stored in the practice). Although it is necessary for the medicine to be transported to various sites in these
practices, this can affect the audit trail without a register being kept.
98. When veterinary ketamine medicines are used in food-producing species, there is a legal requirement to
maintain records and traceability from manufacturer to the animal receiving the medication. Legal action can be
taken in cases of non-compliance.
Illegal supply
99. There is relatively little information available on the routes of supply of illegal ketamine. On the basis of the
available data, the primary source country for ketamine importations to the UK is India, with most importations
being made by fast parcel post and airfreight. Seizures mostly range between 1–5 kg and are commonly
discovered in food stuffs and beauty preparations (SOCA ketamine report). It is not clear based on currently
available data what the source of these ketamine importations are within India.
100. In February 2011, India added ketamine to the list of psychotropic substances controlled under its Narcotic
Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act 1985. This had the effect of significantly increasing the penalties
associated with attempts to illegally transport ketamine out of India.
101. There are challenges in identifying ketamine seized at the UK border and estimating the scale of its supply to the
UK. Until the diversification of the UK drug market with the emergence of new psychoactive substances (NPS),
established drugs such as cocaine, heroin and ketamine could be reliably identified using immunoassays and
colormetric tests. Now that the UK drug market is more diverse, including new variations of established drugs,
these testing methods are a less reliable way of identifying ketamine. Providing alternative technology to
accurately field test for ketamine at the UK border would improve intelligence on the scale of ketamine supply
to the UK.
MEDICAL HARMS
103. Most of the data on the acute toxicity of ketamine has been published since the ACMD 2004 review of ketamine.
105. Overall, 35% identified that ‘health risks’ were an issue related to the use of ketamine. Using pre-defined
physical and psychological effects, individuals were asked whether they had experienced these effects and
whether they were positive or negative effects. Increased heart rate (17% individuals), temporary paralysis
(16%), lack of co-ordination (14%), blurred vision (21%) and feeling no pain (7%) were generally considered to be
positive effects. ‘Increased breathing’ (11% individuals), difficulty breathing (2%), nausea (9%), vomiting (3%)
and convulsions (<1%) were always considered to be ‘negative effects’.
106. Psychological effects that users associated with the desired effects of ketamine (separation from the
environment, separation from the body, auditory and visual hallucinations, ‘unusual thought content’, euphoria,
enhanced colour vision, absence of time and novel body sensations) were generally classified as ‘positive
effects’; only 20% reported that these effects were unwanted and severe. Although 38% reported that they had
had to “deal with someone else who had suffered badly after ketamine use”. The risk of developing a ‘K-hole’
was reported to be greater with increased use of ketamine, particularly in those who had used ketamine more
than 20 times.
108. The UK National Poisons Information Service (NPIS) reported that ketamine was the sixth and tenth most
common recreational drug in terms of TOXBASE accesses and telephone calls to NPIS in the 2011/12 financial
year (see Figure 6). For both TOXBASE accesses and telephone calls to NPIS, there was an increase in the
percentage of overall activity related to ketamine from 2004, peaking in 2010/11 for TOXBASE accesses and
2009/10 for telephone calls to NPIS. No data were available on the clinical effects of acute ketamine toxicity
reported to NPIS (NPIS, 2011/12).
110. In a case series of 116 presentations associated with ketamine use to the same South London Emergency
Department in 2006 (n=58) and 2007 (n=58), only 13 (11.2%) related to lone ketamine use. Other co-used
substances included ethanol (38.8%), GHB/GBL (47.3%), cocaine (19.0%) and MDMA (52.6%). Thirty-eight point
eight per cent had hypertension (systolic BP >140 mmHg) and 29.3% had tachycardia (heart rate ≥100 bpm);
these may in part be due to co-used drugs. There was no difference in the frequency of agitation/aggression
between all patients (25.0%) and those with lone ketamine use (23.1%). Overall length of hospital stay was short
(mean length of stay of 11.2 hours (range 0.3 -– 61.5 hours). No lone ketamine patients were admitted to critical
care (Wood, 2008).
111. Data from the US Drug Abuse Warning Network (DAWN) in 2010 showed that although the number of
Emergency Department presentations relating to the use of ketamine were much lower than other drugs such
as cocaine, between 2005 to 2010 there was a three-fold increase in ketamine presentations (2005 ketamine
303 -vs- cocaine 483,865; 2010 ketamine 915 -vs- cocaine 488,101) (DAWN).
112. The largest ED case series with acute ketamine toxicity is a series of 233 presentations between July 2005 and
June 2008 from Hong Kong. Unlike the data in the UK series, most reported using lone ketamine (co-used
substances included alcohol (24, 10%), MDMA (15, 6%), methamphetamine (14, 6%), benzodiazepines (10, 4%),
113. Symptoms reported included impaired consciousness (106, 45%), dizziness (28, 12%), agitation/irritability (10,
4%), hallucinations (10, 4%), muscle cramp (4, 2%), seizures (2, 1%), chest pain/discomfort (13, 6%), palpitations
(12, 5%), abdominal pain (49, 21%), nausea and/or vomiting (23, 10%), dysuria (20, 9%), urinary
frequency/urgency (8, 3%), dyspnoea (17, 7%). Six (3%) individuals presented with physical injury following the
use of ketamine. Clinical features on examination included tachycardia (HR >100 bpm) in 91 (39%), hypertension
(not defined) in 93 (40%), hyperthermia (not defined) in 32 (14%) and abdominal tenderness in 41 (18%).
114. Similar to other reports, the majority (72%) were managed and discharged directly from the ED. There were no
deaths related to the use of ketamine; five patients were admitted to the intensive care unit, but from the
information provided it is likely that the reason for admission related to co-used substances.
115. There are several reports of pulmonary oedema related to both medical and recreational use of ketamine,
although this has not been reported in the large ED case series; it is unclear what the mechanism is for this, but
animal models suggest ketamine increases alveolar fluid uptake (Tarnow, 1978; Pandey, 2000).
119. There have been no studies investigating the incidence of ketamine-related bladder damage in the UK. However,
a number of studies have investigated how common bladder symptoms are amongst recreational and/or
dependent ketamine users.
In a follow-up interview study to the 2010 Mixmag survey, 1,285 individuals who had self-reported use of
ketamine in the last year were asked about lower urinary tract symptoms (Winstock, 2012). In this group
26.5% (340) reported at least one urinary tract symptom (pain in lower abdomen 11.3% (145), burning or
stinging when passing urine 8.1% (104), needing to pass urine more frequently 17.4% (224), incontinence
3.3% (43) or blood in the urine 1.5% (19)).
Another study looked at urinary tract symptoms in 30 frequent (> four times per week), 30 infrequent (two
times per month to four times per week) and 30 ex-ketamine users (Muetzelfeldt, 2008). Twenty per cent of
frequent users, 6.7% of infrequent users and 13.3% of ex-users reported ‘cystitis or bladder problems’.
Finally, in a questionnaire study of 48 ketamine users in Bristol, 26 (54%) of whom were daily users, 36 (75%)
reported urological symptoms (Weinstock, 2013).
120. The severity of urological symptoms and the degree of bladder damage appear to be in direct proportion to the
amount of ketamine used, the frequency of usage and the length of use. In the Mixmag 2010 follow up study,
higher doses (1 g ketamine or more during a typical session) were associated with higher rates of all urological
symptoms (Winstock, 2012). In the Bristol study, all eight (100%) individuals using more than 5 g of ketamine
daily reported urological symptoms, whereas urological symptoms were only present in ten (50%) of those
reporting use of 0-2 g of ketamine daily (Weinstock, 2013).
122. The changes that occur in the bladder are a direct result of ketamine and its metabolites being excreted via the
kidneys into the urine and coming into direct and prolonged contact with the bladder lining (Cottrell, 2008). This
initially results in inflammation and ulceration of the bladder lining, which can result in bleeding into the
bladder. Prolonged exposure can result in damage to nerve endings, resulting in persistent bladder pain and
fibrosis (scarring) of the bladder. Ultimately, the bladder becomes severely scarred and will shrink; at this stage
the damage may be irreversible (Tsai, 2009; Cottrell, 2008). Individuals with this severe bladder damage need to
pass urine frequently, often having to void every 15-30 minutes, and experience severe bladder pain and blood
in the urine (Tsai, 2009; Cottrell, 2008).
123. Cystoscopy findings in those with ketamine-related bladder problems include inflammation and ulceration of the
bladder wall, haemorrhage and infiltration of the bladder wall with inflammatory cells. In more advanced cases,
significant scarring and shrinkage of the bladder wall will be seen (Tsai, 2009; Cottrell, 2008; Chu, 2008).
124. Removing the insult to the bladder by cessation of ketamine gives the best chance of symptomatic relief and
improvement in bladder pathological changes. The bladder in many cases will heal and although some
symptoms may persist, these generally become more manageable (Tsai, 2009). In the 2010 Mixmag survey, 108
(51%) of 251 individuals who stopped ketamine reported that their urological symptoms improved. However, a
proportion of users, despite stopping the drug, will have persistent symptoms (Personal Communication Prof
David Gillatt).
125. One major problem is control of the bladder pain whilst healing occurs; some users may take higher doses of
ketamine in an attempt to control this pain further increasing the risk of ketamine-related bladder damage. An
appropriate analgesic regime, generally including opiates, is often necessary to treat bladder pain in these
individuals (Wood, 2011; Weinstock, 2013).
126. If cessation of ketamine is not possible, and in those with severe symptoms, a variety of methods of symptom
control may be used including anticholinergic drugs to reduce frequency/urgency, amitriptyline as an
anticholinergic, and sedatives and analgesics (Weinstock, 2013). Bladder protective agents such as hyaluronic
acid may help in some cases, although the data to confirm this are limited (Kalsi, 2011). Bladder distension
under anaesthetic may play a role although this generally only gives a temporary relief of symptoms.
127. Severe frequency/urgency, persistent bladder pain and incontinence may all be indications for surgical
intervention in association with reduced bladder capacity. This usually involves major surgery including removal
of all or part of the bladder and replacement with an intestinal segment (Chung, 2013). As those affected may
be in their twenties this is a drastic step with potential long-term sequelae including renal problems, continence
issues and cancer.
129. Transit of urine through the upper tracts is, however, more rapid than the bladder which acts as a storage
vessel. Therefore damage in the upper tract is less frequently seen. However, scarring and narrowing of the
ureters is well documented in frequent, high-dose ketamine users and can be seen at its early stages
radiologically in a large percentage of those with ketamine-related bladder damage (Mason, 2010). In one series
of 59 individuals with ketamine-related bladder problems, 51% had hydronephrosis (abnormal swelling of the
kidneys); this was bilateral in 44% and unilateral in 7%; 13% also had papillary necrosis (Chu, 2008).
Hydronephrosis can also occur as the result of smooth muscle relaxation (Lo, 2011).
132. It is not clear what the cause of this abdominal pain is. In one series of 37 ketamine users, abdominal pain was
associated with Helicobacter pylori negative gastritis (Poon, 2010). However, as discussed below, there is the
potential that in some individuals this pain may relate to ketamine effects on the liver and/or gallbladder.
133. There have been a number of reports of abnormal liver function associated with ketamine use. In an Emergency
Department series of 233 acute ketamine toxicity presentations in Hong Kong, 35 (15%) had abnormal liver
function (Poon, 2010). In some of the reports of ketamine-related liver effects, dilatation of the common bile
duct (similar in appearance to choledochal cysts) was found on ultrasound and/or CT imaging of the liver (Poon,
2010; Ng, 2009; Wong, 2009). There are no data to be able to determine whether, like the urological effects of
ketamine, these effects may be dose-related. It appears that generally the common bile duct dilatation and liver
function tests improve with ketamine cessation (Poon, 2010; Ng, 2009; Wong, 2009).
134. There are also reports of abnormal liver function tests associated with therapeutic use of ketamine (Dundee,
1980; Noppers ,2011). In one series, 14/34 patients anaesthetised with ketamine had abnormal liver function
tests (Dundee, 1980); the other report described three patients receiving ketamine by intermitted intravenous
infusion who developed abnormal liver function related to ketamine which settled within two months of
stopping ketamine (Noppers, 2011).
135. The cause of these ketamine-related liver effects is poorly understood. Data from an in vitro study in human
hepatoma G2 cells have suggested that S(+) ketamine is directly hepatotoxic (Lee, 2009). However, the finding of
common bile duct dilatation suggests a mixed aetiology with an obstructive component.
Fatalities
Office for National Statistics (ONS) Drug-Related Deaths Data
136. The number of deaths in which ketamine has been mentioned on the death certificate in England and Wales,
split by year of death registration, is shown in Figure 7. It is not possible from these data to determine whether
ketamine was responsible for the death(s). It is also important to note that there is variation between coroners
regarding drug testing in deaths.
16
14 Any mention of
12 ketamine on the death
certificate
10
8
6 Only ketamine
4 mentioned on the death
2 certificate (alcohol may
have also been involved
0
in these deaths)
2004
2011
2001
2002
2003
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2012
Figure 7 Number of deaths per year in England and Wales in which ketamine has been mentioned on the death
certificate (Office for National Statistics)
Table 2 Number of deaths where ketamine was mentioned on the death certificate (England and Wales), by age
group (Office for National Statistics)
139. The first death in which ketamine was implicated was in 1997. From then until 2005 there were fewer than five
deaths per year where ketamine was either found in post-mortem toxicology samples and/or implicated in
death. The number of these cases increased until 2009, peaking at 26 and 21 respectively; there was then a
decline with the number of cases falling to nine and six in 2012.
140. Of the 93 deaths in the np-SAD database, 86% are male and mean age at death was 30.9 (range 15.8 – 60.6)
years. The majority were employed (60%), had a history of previous drug use (75%) and lived with others (54%).
Drowning occurred in nine instances and there were three road traffic accidents where use of ketamine may
have impaired judgement.
141. Although in most cases ketamine was detected together with alcohol and/or other drugs (70/93), there are 23
cases where ketamine was the sole substance implicated in the cause of death.
142. The principal (n=70, 75%) underlying cause of death was accidental poisoning not solely relating to ketamine. In
the remaining 23 cases it is not possible to be certain whether ketamine was the cause of death.
144. At low doses ketamine induces distortion of time and space, hallucinations and mild dissociative effects.
According to users, the most appealing aspects of ketamine use are ‘melting into the surroundings’, ‘visual
hallucinations’, ‘out-of-body experiences’ and ‘giggliness’ (Muetzelfeldt, 2008).
145. At large doses, ketamine induces a more severe dissociation commonly referred to as a ‘K-hole’, wherein the
user experiences intense detachment to the point that their perceptions appear completely divorced from their
previous reality. This is a desired effect for some users, but for others it can be an unpleasant and frightening
experience.
146. Acute pleasure associated with taking the drug may underpin the reinforcing properties of many recreational
drugs (e.g. Robinson, 1993). Acutely, ketamine increases extracellular dopamine (DA) concentrations in the rat
147. Ketamine also interacts with μ-opioid receptors and non-opioid σ-receptor sites (Kapur, 2002), which may also
relate to its rewarding properties, although affinity of the drug for these receptors is relatively low. There has
been a suggestion that different isoforms of ketamine may have different neurochemical, and possibly
reinforcing properties (Jansen, 2001). S+ ketamine has a much greater affinity for the NMDA-receptor, and R-
ketamine has a greater opioid action.
148. Acute reinforcing effects in animals and humans: Preclinical findings suggest clear similarities between ketamine
and other addictive drugs in a wide range of behavioural paradigms. Rats will self-administer ketamine (Marquis,
1989; Winger, 2002), show conditioned place preference (Suzuki, 2000) and locomotor sensitisation following
repeated doses has been observed (Meyer, 2007; Trujillo, 2008; Wiley 2008). Furthermore, ketamine substitutes
for ethanol in drug discrimination paradigms in rats (Harrison, 1998; Shelton, 2004). Humans dependent on
alcohol show enhanced NMDA receptor function (Krystal, 2010) and in recently detoxified alcoholics, ketamine
produces ethanol-like subjective effects including a ‘high’ (Krystal, 1998).
149. Studies with healthy volunteers have found that intravenous (IV) ketamine increases subjective ratings of ‘high’
(Krystal, 1999) and this relates to its abuse potential. In one study, sub-anaesthetic doses (0.4 mg/kg and 0.8
mg/kg] or placebo were given IV to healthy, ketamine-naive volunteers (Morgan, 2004a). They rated how much
they ‘liked’ the drug and ‘wanted more’ of it. An inverted U-shaped dose response curve was found. Shortly
after the infusion started, they both liked and wanted more of both doses. Towards the end of the 80-minute
infusion, these ratings had markedly reduced in the high-dose group whereas the low-dose group still liked and
wanted more of the drug.
150. Despite anecdotal reports of a high risk of accidental injury whilst acutely intoxicated with ketamine, largely due
to the dissociation and analgesia (e.g. Lilly, 1978; Moore, 1978), there are sparse scientific data on this risk.
Because ketamine is a powerful analgesic, the intoxicated user is more vulnerable to injury. One case study
reported a hospital worker who had injected ketamine collapsing with their face on an electric fire and suffering
third-degree burns (Jansen, 2001). In a study of 90 ketamine users, 13% reported being involved in an accident
as a direct result of taking ketamine and 83% knew someone who had (Muetzelfeldt, 2008).
151. An important public health and safety message is therefore that those acutely intoxicated with ketamine should
not be left alone because of the risk of accidents. It is also important for staff working in settings where
ketamine may be used (e.g. night-time economy and festivals) to be aware of the risks and vulnerability
associated with the dissociative and analgesic effects of ketamine.
154. Morgan et al. (Morgan 2012) found that daily ketamine users showed a similar pattern of ‘basic symptoms’ to
individuals prodromal for schizophrenia. However, there is no evidence of clinical psychotic symptoms in
infrequent ketamine users (Narendran, 2005) and despite anecdotes (e.g. Jansen, 2001; Lilly, 1978) there is little
evidence of any link between chronic, heavy ketamine use and diagnosis of a psychotic disorder. Nevertheless,
John Krystal at Yale has reported that he feels that there are numerous cases of ketamine-induced psychosis in
psychiatric hospitals in Hong Kong (personal communication).
156. Several studies have examined cognitive function in infrequent and frequent ketamine users (e.g. Curran, 2000;
Curran, 2001; Morgan, 2009; 2004b; 2006a; 2006b; Narendran, 2005). Overall, recreational ketamine use does
not appear to be associated with long-term cognitive impairment. However, the most robust findings are that
frequent, dependent ketamine users exhibit profound impairments in both short- and long-term memory (for
review see Morgan and Curran 2006). It is not known currently whether these changes are reversible if users
cease ketamine use.
157. Many studies have been cross-sectional and cannot address causation. However, in a longitudinal study,
frequent ketamine use caused impairment in visual recognition and spatial working memory that correlated
with changes in level of ketamine use over 12 months (Morgan, 2010). Other impairments in planning and
frontal function have been observed but appear to be unrelated to measures of ketamine use (Morgan, 2009).
Neurological changes
158. Increased D1 receptor binding in the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex of ketamine users has been reported,
indicating upregulation of dopaminergic receptors (Narendran, 2005).
159. White matter abnormalities have been observed in dependent ketamine users compared to controls (Liao,
2010). Reduced fractional anisotropy correlated with the degree of ketamine use in the bilateral frontal and left
temporoparietal regions. There were also small changes in the temporal region that may relate to the drug’s
impairment of episodic memory. Similar changes have been observed in other drug-dependent populations
(Nestler, 2005) suggesting that these may not be specific effects of ketamine. However, more recent studies
comparing 16 ketamine users with16 poly-drug-using controls found white matter abnormalities in the right
hemisphere in ketamine users compared with controls (Edward Roberts, 2013).
161. An interview study of 100 recreational users found that 20% perceived employment-related problems to result
from their ketamine use (Dillon, 2003). Morgan et al. (2010) found that frequent/daily users had spent
significantly fewer years in education than infrequent or non-users.
163. An interview study of 90 ketamine users found that 57% of frequent users, 43% of infrequent users and 60% of
ex-users expressed concerns about ketamine dependence (Muetzelfeldt, 2008). The majority of frequent users
in that study reported using the drug without stopping until supplies ran out, so compulsive patterns of
behaviour are also a concern. Other reported features of dependence include salience of use and continued use
despite harmful consequences (Muetzelfeldt, 2008).
164. In a follow-up survey to the 2009 Mixmag survey, 1,285 individuals with ketamine use in the previous year were
assessed for dependence using DSM-IV criteria that were operationalised to give a proxy measure for
dependence (Winstock, 2012). Based on these criteria, 17% (218) were considered as dependent on ketamine.
166. Tolerance is associated with frequent use with significant and rapid increases in dose reported in some studies.
Frequent ketamine users report escalating doses over time, with one study finding a 600% increase from first
use to current use (Morgan, 2008). Objective data from hair analyses showed a doubling of ketamine
concentrations in hair over a year in infrequent ketamine users (Morgan, 2010). Frequent ketamine users’ hair
did not change, but they were probably already using maximal amounts.
167. Craving seems to be a key problem in frequent users: 28 of the 30 daily users in a study by Morgan et al. (2008)
reported having tried to stop taking the drug but failed; all reported ketamine cravings as the reason for failure.
The same study found 12 of the 30 daily users reported withdrawal symptoms characterised by anxiety, shaking,
sweating and palpitations when they stopped using.
168. A few published case studies also show craving and somatic and psychological aspects of anxiety as withdrawal
symptoms (Blatchut, 2009; Critchlow, 2006; Lim, 2003).
169. There is currently little evidence about physiological withdrawal from ketamine users (Morgan, 2011). However,
a psychological withdrawal syndrome including anxiety, drug craving, tremulousness and palpitations have been
described (Critchlow, 2006; Morgan, 2008; Blachut, 2009).
170. Critchlow (2006) provided a detailed description of ketamine discontinuation in a single patient as follows:
1–4 hours after cessation: craving and drug hunting;
4–8 hours after cessation: anxiety, shaking, sweating, palpitations, low mood, great effort required to resist
craving; these symptoms were decreased by alcohol consumption;
24–48 hours after cessation: tiredness, low appetite and low mood; at this point the patient would ‘take to
bed for 24 hours and wake feeling recovered’.
171. A small number of cases report more severe symptoms on ketamine cessation including nightmares and
psychosis which were relieved by further ketamine use (Lim, 2003).
Treatment of dependence
172. UK drug services are describing modest increases in requests for treatment of ketamine-related problems.
Ketamine presentations rose year on year between 2005-6 and 2010-11, from 114 to 845 but fell slightly in
2011-12 to 751 (National Treatment Agency for Substance Misuse ‘Club drugs: emerging trends and risks’,
2012).
173. A small number of specialist drug services offering specific treatment pathways for ketamine users, in areas of
anticipated higher need, are reporting significant demand from a cohort of patients who are generally using
most or every day in amounts of up to several grams of illicit ketamine (Personal Communication, Dr Owen
Bowden Jones and Dr Luke Mitcheson).
174. There is little evidence relating to the treatment of ketamine dependence other than case reports (Critchlow,
2006).
175. In the absence of a clear evidence base, it has been suggested that accepted evidence-based psychological
interventions such as relapse prevention be used as for other illicit drugs (Maxwell, 2003; Winstock, 2012) and
symptomatic prescribing for discontinuation symptoms (Critchlow, 2006,; Krystal, 1998) be considered.
176. The Department of Health published UK guidelines on drug treatment (DH, 2007) which provide a
comprehensive basis for the delivery of drug treatment including the delivery of psychosocial interventions in
community, in-patient and residential settings. The UK guidance does incorporate summaries of, and refers to,
the current relevant NICE guidance on drug misuse treatments (NICE, 2007). Of particular relevance for
ketamine treatment, the current established guidance recommends the availability of a range of evidence-based
psychosocial interventions.
SOCIAL HARMS
179. During the second quarter of 2012, the number of UK police seizures of ketamine was twice that for the
preceding quarter at 162.
180. The scale of ketamine supply in the UK by criminal groups is difficult to quantify. The low number of groups
identified by Organised Crime Group Mapping compared to the increasing identification of ketamine use around
the UK does not currently correlate. Groups supplying Class A drugs are more likely to attract a higher threat
score on the data than those supplying Class C drugs such as ketamine.
181. According to the OCGM tracker, criminal groups involved in the supply of ketamine represent less than 1% of all
crime groups identified.
182. The wholesale price for ketamine has increased from GBP 4,500 per kg in 2012 to GBP 5,250 in March 2013. This
is a rise of GBP 750 per kg. The street price of ketamine at £10–£20 per gram is broadly similar to the street
prices of amphetamine and mephedrone. Ketamine is cheaper than cocaine, which for normal street purity
ranges sells for between £30 and £50 per gram. A dealer purchasing one kilogram of ketamine for approximately
£5,000 should be able to double their money by selling it on for at least £10,000 (at £10 per gram). The profit
margins for mephedrone are broadly similar. Profits for amphetamine are normally greater, as unlike ketamine
and mephedrone, amphetamine is normally bulked with adulterants to increase the amount of powder (which
lowers the purity).
184. In the Netherlands, there have been reports of ketamine being mixed with methoxetamine. Similar findings have
been noted in Spain with ketamine mixed with both mephedrone and methoxetamine. Reports from users have
pointed out that the effects of taking these substances are more unpleasant than those of ketamine.
185. A small number of samples taken from seizures of ketamine during the first quarter of 2012 had been mixed
with other substances including cocaine, mephedrone, 4-methylethcathinone and a mixture of piperazines
(SOCA ketamine report).
Case studies
Published literature
186. An interview study of 100 recreational users found that 20% perceived employment-related problems to result
from their ketamine use (Dillon, 2003). In another study, frequent/daily users of ketamine had spent
significantly fewer years in education than infrequent or non-users (Morgan, 2010).
188. Families of ketamine users report negative impact on the family related to ketamine use. Examples include the
breakdown of family relations because of stealing, mood swings and aggression. In some cases this has led to
family break up and users seeking a home with foster care.
189. Other reports include ketamine use leading to social exclusion, with long-lasting impact on social skills and
decreased participation in social activities. Others report negative financial impacts of a regular ketamine habit,
for example failing to pay mortgage or rent and falling behind with or having to take time off work.
190. Some personal reports explained that the ease of purchasing ketamine was a significant factor when a user was
trying to reduce ketamine use and recover.
Evidence presented by Matt Southwell to the ACMD Ketamine Working Group (05-10-2013)
191. An individual using ketamine can often look strange or ‘odd’ to others around them who have not taken
ketamine because of the dissociative effects. When ketamine first came onto the UK market, users tended to
take ketamine in groups. Since then, younger users have started taking ketamine in groups where a variety of
drugs are being used and their odd appearance is more noticeable and can be viewed as sociably unacceptable.
192. The effects of ketamine can be perceived as letting the user opt out or not deal with life and often the reality is
that regular ketamine users will become socially excluded.
The ‘K-hole’ and vulnerability in some social settings
193. At large doses, ketamine can induce dissociation (the ‘K-hole’). The user experiences intense detachment that
can be an unpleasant and frightening experience. The company of others (e.g. friends, staff in
nightclubs/festivals) can help the user deal with this experience.
194. The dissociative effect of ketamine can also place the user in a position where they are vulnerable to robbery,
assault and/or rape. Users may also be less conscious of the number of sexual partners they have, which may in
turn have consequences for their sexual health.
INTERVENTIONS
196. There are a number of websites (international, national and local) dedicated to providing information about
ketamine. Some of these are moderated and reviewed (e.g. FRANK, Know the Score, DAN); others are not, and
contain information from users which may not present an accurate and comprehensive picture.
197. The evidence base in drug prevention suggests that provision of drug-related information, whilst it clearly has
value in sharing knowledge, does not in itself deliver significant levels of early behaviour change and might in
some cases produce some negative effects (Chowdry, 2013).
198. The ACMD is not aware of any evidence-based ketamine education or prevention interventions that are
currently being delivered in the UK. A number of organisations and individuals provide training to professionals
on ketamine, some of which do include elements on education and prevention. There are also a number of
sources of general evidence-based guidance on drug education and prevention programmes; these include: the
Department for Education (DfE) funded Centre for Analysis for Youth Transitions repository of impact studies
(http://www.ifs.org.uk/centres/caytRepPublications); howdrythe DfE funded Alcohol and Drug Education and
Prevention Information Service (ADEPIS) http://mentor-adepis.org/; the European Commission funded Drug
Prevention Quality Standards (http://www.emcdda.europa.eu/publications/manuals/prevention-standards) and
in the resources offered by Dartington Social Research Unit (http://dartington.org.uk/).
Web references
CEM: College of Emergency Medicine. Guideline for ketamine sedation for children in Emergency Departments.
Available at: http://secure.collemergencymed.ac.uk/asp/document.asp?ID=4880 [Last Accessed October 2013]
Concateno Global Drug Testing Services. Available at: http://www.concateno.com/products-services/laboratory-
testing/urine-drug-testing/ [Last Accessed September 2013]
DAWN. Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality (2012). Guide to DAWN Trend Tables, 2010 Update.
Rockville, MD: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Available at:
http://www.samhsa.gov/data/2k12/DAWN2k10/DAWN2k10-Trend-Tables.htm [Last Accessed June 2013]
Department for Transport, 2013 Consultation “Regulations to Specify the Drugs and Corresponding Limits for the
New Offence of Driving with a Specified Controlled Drug in the Body Above the Specified Limit” available at
https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/drug-driving-proposed-regulations [Last accessed October 2013]
Erowid: Ketamine. http://www.erowid.org/chemicals/ketamine/ketamine.shtml [Last accessed June 2013]
Home Office [2012] Drug misuse declared: findings from the 2011 to 2012 Crime Survey for England and Wales
(CSEW) (second edition). London, Home Office. Available from https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/drug-
misuse-declared-findings-from-the-2011-to-2012-crime-survey-for-england-and-wales-csew-second-edition/drug-
misuse-declared-findings-from-the-2011-to-2012-crime-survey-for-england-and-wales-csew-second-edition [Last
accessed October 13]
Home Office [2013] Drug misuse: findings from the 2012 to 2013 CSEW. London, Home Office. Available from
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/drug-misuse-findings-from-the-2012-to-2013-csew [Last accessed
December 2013]
Ketalar Injection - electronic Medicines Compendium (eMC) - print friendly, 2010
http://www.medicines.org.uk/emc/medicine/12939/SPC
ACMD members
Ms Gillian Arr-Jones Pharmacist
Mr Martin Barnes Chief Executive, DrugScope
Mr Simon Bray Commander, Metropolitan Police, and training and development lead
Dr Roger Brimblecombe Pharmacologist
Ms Annette Dale-Perera Strategic director, addiction and offender care, Central North West Thames
NHS Foundation Trust
Dr Paul Dargan Consultant Physician and Clinical Toxicologist, Guys and St Thomas’ NHS
Foundation Trust and Reader in Toxicology, King’s College London
Professor Simon Gibbons Professor of Medicinal Phytochemistry, UCL School of Pharmacy; Professor of
Medicinal Phytochemistry and Head of the Department of Pharmaceutical and
Biological Chemistry at the UCL School of Pharmacy
Ms Sarah Graham Director, Sarah Graham Solutions – addictions therapist
Professor Raymond Hill Neuropharmacologist
ACMD members
Dr Paul Dargan Consultant Physician and Clinical Toxicologist, Guys and St Thomas’ NHS
Foundation Trust and Reader in Toxicology, King’s College London
Mr Nigel Kirby Deputy Director, Planning and Risk, National Crime Agency
Professor Fiona Measham Professor of Criminology in the School of Applied Social Sciences at Durham
University
Professor Harry Sumnall Professor in Substance Misuse, Liverpool John Moores University
Ms Gillian Arr-Jones Pharmacist
Commander Simon Bray Metropolitan Police, and training and development lead
Dr Roger Brimblecombe Pharmacologist
Ms Annette Dale-Perera Strategic director, addiction and offender care, Central North West Thames
NHS Foundation Trust
Co-opted members
Dr Dominic Aldington Consultant in Pain Medicine, Royal Hampshire County Hospital
Dr Owen Bowden Jones Consultant Psychiatrist and Lead Clinician for Club Drug Clinic Addictions
Directorate, Central and North West London NHS Foundation Trust
Professor Valerie Curran Professor of Psychopharmacology, University College London
Baroness Ilora Finlay Baroness Finlay of Llandaff, Professor of Palliative Medicine, Cardiff University
School of Medicine
Professor David Gillatt Professor of Urology, University of Bristol
Dr Rutendo Manyarara Veterinary Assessor (Pharmaceuticals), Veterinary Medicines Directorate
Dr Luke Mitcheson Consultant Clinical Psychologist, Head of Addictions Psychology and Lead
Psychologist for Lambeth Addictions, South London and Maudsley NHS
Foundation Trust
Mr Ric Treble Scientific Advisor, LGC
Dr Mike White Former Forensic Intelligence Adviser
Dr David Wood Consultant Physician and Clinical Toxicologist, Guys and St Thomas’ NHS
Foundation Trust and Senior Lecturer, King’s College London
Individual sections of the report were drafted by Working Group members. All Working Group members had the
opportunity to comment on early and final drafts of the report.
The following individuals and organisations gave oral evidence, research papers and written representations and
shared information with the ACMD.
Dr Ian Back, Consultant in Palliative Medicine, Y Bwthyn and Royal Glamorgan Hospital Cwm Taf Health Board,
Wales
Dr Rupert McShane, Consultant psychiatrist, Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust and Honorary Senior Clinical
Lecturer
Dr Celia Morgan, Senior Lecturer at Exeter University and honorary Reader in Psychopharmacology at University
College London
Mat Southwell, Partner Coact
Shielmor Twomey – founder, Ketamine Awareness-Caleb's Campaign 2010
Vicky Unwin, mother of Louise Cattell, who drowned in her bath after taking ketamine; Ambassador for the
Angelus Foundation and campaigner for drug education to be made part of the National Curriculum
Dr Andrew Wilcock, Macmillan Reader in Palliative Medicine and Medical Oncology, Nottingham University
Hospital NHS Trust, Nottingham
Professor David Yew, Dr med (habil), DSc, PhD. Emeritus Professor of Anatomy and Research Professor of the
Institute of Chinese Medicine, Chinese University of Hong Kong