Professional Documents
Culture Documents
_______________
* FIRST DIVISION.
95
www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000016d1b2a0e3432d60b21003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False 1/16
9/10/2019 SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 644
ng Legenda (KML-Independent)
96
www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000016d1b2a0e3432d60b21003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False 2/16
9/10/2019 SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 644
_______________
97
ceed because the required number of the total rank and file
employees necessary for certification purposes is still
sustained. KML also claimed that its legitimacy as a labor
www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000016d1b2a0e3432d60b21003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False 3/16
9/10/2019 SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 644
_______________
98
_______________
99
ing unit for the last three (3) months prior to the issuance of this
decision.
SO DECIDED.”8
www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000016d1b2a0e3432d60b21003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False 5/16
9/10/2019 SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 644
_______________
100
www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000016d1b2a0e3432d60b21003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False 6/16
9/10/2019 SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 644
_______________
101
www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000016d1b2a0e3432d60b21003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False 7/16
9/10/2019 SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 644
Petitioner’s Arguments
LEGEND submits that the Court of Appeals grievously
erred in ruling that the March 26, 2002 Decision denying
its Petition for Cancellation of KML’s registration has
already become final and executory. It asserts that it has
seasonably
_______________
18 Id., at p. 502.
19 Id., at pp. 505-525.
20 Rollo of G.R. No. 169754, p. 826.
102
www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000016d1b2a0e3432d60b21003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False 8/16
9/10/2019 SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 644
Our Ruling
_______________
103
_______________
104
_______________
www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000016d1b2a0e3432d60b21003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False 10/16
9/10/2019 SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 644
31 Rollo of G.R. No. 169972, pp. 35-45; penned by Associate Justice
Rebecca De Guia-Salvador and concurred in by Associate Justices
Conrado M. Vasquez, Jr. and Aurora Santiago-Lagman.
32 The dispositive portion of the Decision reads:
WHEREFORE, public respondent’s impugned March 26, 2002 decision
is REVERSED and SET ASIDE. In lieu thereof, another is entered
ordering the REINSTATEMENT of the November 7, 2001 Decision in
Case No. RO300-0108-P-001.
SO ORDERED. (Id., at p. 45.)
33 Id., at p. 47.
34 Id., at pp. 10-33.
35 Id., at p. 316.
36 Id. (unpaged).
37 Id. (unpaged).
105
_______________
106
_______________
107
_______________
108
www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000016d1b2a0e3432d60b21003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False 14/16
9/10/2019 SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 644
_______________
109
www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000016d1b2a0e3432d60b21003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False 15/16
9/10/2019 SUPREME COURT REPORTS ANNOTATED VOLUME 644
_______________
110
SO ORDERED.
——o0o——
www.central.com.ph/sfsreader/session/0000016d1b2a0e3432d60b21003600fb002c009e/t/?o=False 16/16